Did Trump Pick Richard Grenell as VP
Trumpin For VP Pick?
A buddy of mine sent me a text. He thinks it might be Richard Grenell based on what Sebastian Gorka said.
Gorka mentioned... "This is not identity politics.. and no one is even talking about the pick".
What do you guys think?
I like Richard.
But if this is true. I am not sure it will help with the culture war.
What is your thoughts?
Grenell was president for a day, according to Google. On Mar 20 2021.
Came here to remind y’all of this.
How? Explain. This is not clear to me after looking for an answer briefly.
I will link an old thread - after potatus was inaugurated, If you googled "who is the president of the United states" the answer was grenell and linked to his wiki page.
Screenshot linked in top comment here https://greatawakening.win/p/12jvuF6lGK/anyone-remember-potus-grenell/
I remember that. What a crazy time that was!!
What do you think of him as a VP pick?
I think there are much better options, but I wouldn't be opposed!
Edit: I wouldn't be opposed if that is who trump picks. Unlikely though.
I agree. I can't wait to see who his press secretary is. If it's not Kayleigh McEnany, I want Ted Nugent just because he has no f*%$s to give and he might make the MSM cry.
I would love for his press secretary to be Tucker Carlson! I think that would be something to watch!
Ooh, I didn't think of him. That would be awesome.
Talking with my fam, someone was talking about Tucker as VP, I said “No, Tucker would be a damn good Press Secretary for Trump’s administration”. I think he would rock that position like a boss. :-)
Tucker would be a good VP ---- interviews Putin
He would be a great choice.
The salt would flow
Yes, but couldn't we just roll out AJ for a day? Just for lulz? i mean, if we're going scorched earth anyway.....
I wonder if he will wear his red Kabbalah bracelet?
I would like to see a Press secretary that will shake it up--James Woods
Nice idea. I know that he's smart enough but he might be too thoughtful to be able to shoot from the the hip. But I could be wrong.
James Woods seems like he'd be able to shoot from the hip like a sharpshooter. I don't think he'd want the position though as it isn't his forte. Plus he's more of an attack dog overall (not all of the time mind you, but many of his "classics" are attacks).
Trump's first 100 days of his 2nd/3rd term are gonna be biblical ... He's gonna need a great communicator. Tucker Carlson could do that, but I think he'd be a hell of a lot more effective on the outside. I suspect it'll be someone we don't expect personally, but that's just me.
I agree
From Gorka. Full Stop. KEK ! !
Yeah, I'm old so I don't remember the reason, but he's not on the list people I lean towards trusting.
He’s very anti-Q.
That wouldn't sway me.... He was very against the mandates and says a lot of good things. And he definitely believes there is/was election fraud.
I'm not sure why I feel the way I do, could've been I was already pissed off when he said something lol.
It was not Jan 20th 2021, it was March 20th 2021.
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Richard_Grenell&oldid=1013181415
The page was edited by user 'Qwashere2021'
If you check the post from 2 years ago some of the top comments suggest it was a troll, https://greatawakening.win/p/12jvuF6lSl/
👍
A queer? No thanks. I’ve seen enough.
This would hurt him with his minority pick up as well.
Let’s not play into the DEI bullshit. Trump needs to pick the most qualified Patriot he knows regardless.
Yet, if Richard Grenell were the most qualified patriot you would turn him down.
That would be hypocrisy.
And yet...that isn't meritocracy.
Absolutely I would turn him down. I wouldn’t extend the invitation in the first place. Queers are destroying our country, our children and our culture. Would you pick marginally or even highly qualified satanist for your VP?
That isn't meritocracy then.
First: VP is not the role that dictates any of that.
Second: Tactically, a VP like Richard Grenell (or Carson, etc.) would create chaos in the left's camp as they would immediately do backflips in order to attack them for being gay or black or female, which would create massive implications.
Are you telling me you wouldn't vote for Trump if he chose Grenell?
What does it matter if we win, if we destroy the country in the process? Not being subservient to the Lord leads to the downfall of society.
And the ends don't justify the means. It's not worth it to "own the libs" if it means doing that which is wrong.
Satanism is ideology.
Sexuality is not inherently due to ideology.
Oh, but it is.
To have a propensity for a certain sin is not inherently due to ideology, but to accept a behavior as good, ok, and correct, especially when he claims to be a practicing Christian, is 100% an ideology.
If he can't read the Bible clear-mindedly enough to realize that homosexuality is sin, how can he be trusted to read any laws and come to a sound conclusion? Or to read the constitution and understand it?
When the New Testament speaks of sexual sin, it’s referring to sexual violence — like rape, slavery/human trafficking, sex with boys/children. Thats what the temple prostitution was all about.
The OT is a different religion based on legalism.
Pretty sure that it's satanic, communist pedophiles that are ruining the country.
Really not worried about a gay man who has stood by DJT since day 1 and continues to defend him on a daily basis.
You do realize that there are many, many gay people who detest the Leftist agenda, right?
Homosexuality goes against God, and therefore is for Satan.
When the New Testament speaks of sexual sin, it’s referring to sexual violence — like rape, slavery/human trafficking, sex with boys/children. Thats what the temple prostitution was all about.
The OT is a different religion based on legalism.
No hypocrisy here: Trump should pick a sufficiently qualified heterosexual, white, Christian man.
You cannot espouse meritocracy if you hold specific opinions like that.
Also, you may get away with the heterosexual and Christian bit, but you have zero religious standing for the racial bit.
Ben Carson is a better human than 99% of this country. As is Clarence Thomas.
I never espoused a total meritocracy, hence "sufficiently" qualified. Though also, and I made this same argument back when I was defending Amy Coney Barrett from people saying Trump was playing identity politics, but you can usually find a perfectly qualified candidate even if you decide they have to meet some qualification that's unrelated to merit.
The same applies here. Where it stops applying is when ludicrous lefties want to find some unicorn who's a black, gay, trans woman, since there aren't very many of them to begin with. When that is your criteria, you end up with someone unqualified. When your criteria is "straight white man" or "woman" your selection pool is like half of the available candidates because plenty of those kinds of people exist in our country.
Now, you're not totally wrong on race. If there was no good white candidate I'd agree, as my position is not "don't pick a non-white dude" but instead "pick a white dude", however there are absolutely plenty of equally good candidates that are white and so it should be no issue to pick one of them.
And I never said I had any religious standing for the white part (though I'm sure I could conjure something logical up. God did separate the nations, and gave different nations to different peoples), and because of that it's the qualifier I care the least about. However, until the demonization of the white race ceases, I'm perfectly fine holding to the position that white people should be preferred for these roles. That's an active preference for something, as opposed to a specific aversion to something.
Edit: Also, to be clear after rereading your initial comment, and since this comment mainly focuses on scenarios where there's no most qualified: I would absolutely turn down a gay dude even if he was objectively the most qualified.
Frankly, I'd argue that being gay precludes one from being qualified to run a country in the first place. Society can not stand on rejection of God. At that point we are already doomed to destruction and failure.
That of course doesn't apply to race, though I'd likely apply it to gender as well.
Everyone replying to this comment is acting like he is the cross dressing luggage thief and some pink haired soy boy. How about you accept people for the content of their character and not who they share their private life with. Grinnell has been a loyal Trump supporter and trusted advisor. Trump doesn't get caught up in the gay bullshit and neither should you. Trump is the furthest thing from DEI. It is possible that a gay man could be the most qualified patriot he knows. Grinnell isn't the one destroying our country, and if you have a picture of him dressed up like a furry, please present it. There are a lot of gay patriots, so stop lumping them all into the same group. It is gay DEMOCRATS that are destroying the country, not gay MAGA.
Ignoring God is destroying our country. No political bullshit is going to fix this. Trump is not the savior. The Lord Jesus Christ is.
The Bible is clear. Abomination.
🎯
Homosexuality is abomination.
Not every homosexual is a child predator.
Both of these are true, and it's not fucking hard to not be a tool and accept this.
Otherwise, mostly accurate and based.
He picks the homo, he loses the black vote he gained. None of the other homos or homo lovers will ever vote for Trump anyway.
All my homo friends would like to go back to a time when it wasn't mainstream to be homo. It's like making it mainstream took some of the freaky fun out of it. And for the record, these are olde queens that went through the bad ole days.
Also a homo, and I hate everything the rainbow flag brigade has done to “other” us and attach us to a political agenda that leads to:
And that’s without even mentioning the very real Satanic child trafficking, grooming, abuse, and harvesting that I think everyone here is aware of thanks to this whole movement.
And there’s way more of us than you realize or know. We’re fighting for your right to tell us that we’re wrong, just as much as we’re fighting against the groomers and tyrants.
Thank you for your words, FLUSMC. Gratified and mildly surprised to see that there are far more upvotes for your comment than downvotes.
Bothers me greatly that we have people on this board that don't recognize that there are many, many patriotic gay men who are against the Leftist social agenda and who are good, upstanding citizens who utterly detest pedophiles.
An upstanding citizen of what? An upright, just, and virtuous society? Impossible, as no such society would tolerate or accept such a thing.
The thing is, to be an abomination to God precludes one from the description "upstanding". An acceptance of such a thing leads to the wholesale destruction of any and every society that tries or has ever tried it.
He picks a homo, he loses way more than the black vote. He loses the entire Christian vote too.
If you refuse to vote Trump because of who his VP pick is, gotta be honest that's pretty gay.
Here's the difference between you and I, I guess: I understand the power and lackthereof that a VP has. I don't personally care who Trump picks as VP because Trump himself is the show runner.
It can be Grenell. It can be Carson, Noem, Lake. It could be Joe Biden himself.
I'm still voting Trump without complaint.
Now this I 100% agree with.
I don't know how a single person with a functioning brain could justify the idea that Trump + gay dude is worse than Biden + Kameltoe or any other shit tier Democrat ticket.
Politically, Trump is our best shot. To refuse to vote for him because of his VP is akin to just giving up altogether.
Am a gay Christian. You think the entire Christian population would turn their back on Trump if he picks a perfectly normal MAGA Partiot who just happens to be gay?
How does anyone just "happen to be gay?"
It’s not uncommon for people with same gender attraction to have felt differences going back to as young as they can remember.
The same way straight people have at least some indication of flirting or having crushes on opposite gender going back to as young as they can remember.
So in terms of internal feelings and attraction, yes, it does just happen to be.
How those feelings are dealt with is an entirely separate matter, which does involve some degree of personal choice and responsibility, but the actual, deep seated feelings of attraction do not necessarily require this.
When taking into account all the ways in which kids can be groomed to be gay, the portion left that is "born gay" might as well be zero.
Even if no direct grooming takes place, what are the kids exposed to? Our modern culture is a sexually depraved wasteland, and there's likely plenty of shit being used by the cabal to achieve their goals in very subtle ways.
Even just unintentional environmental cues could lead to such a behavior or outlook, particularly in our society, which would affirm this before suggesting that it is inherently wrong.
I also find it extremely uncompelling to think that a man could simply not be attracted to the opposite sex. Something is more than likely physically or psychologically wrong at that point.
And in the same way someone with a propensity for angry outbursts is not valid in their disordered urges, someone with a propensity for homosexuality is not valid in their disordered urges.
The first guy shouldn't yell at people and should work to control his anger, and the second guy shouldn't have gay butt sex and should work to control his sexual desires.
Demons, probably.
Only the ones that have already turned away because of “mean tweets”, and those are probably too far under the media’s spell to worry about.
MAGA isn’t about one individual viewpoint of the ideal, perfect Christian person. The people for whom that is the goal, will always be disappointed.
Grenell is more openly Christian, and talks about Christ, more than Trump and most other figures on either side. That’s likely to be the strongest Christian representation we’ve had in a lifetime.
Grenell can not be unrepentantly gay and Christian, in the same way a Mormon can't deny the divinity of Christ and be a Christian. To deny that homosexuality is bad is to deny Christ.
Contradiction in terms.
But no, I'd still vote for the Donald because he's the best we've got, whether or not he picks a gay dude.
Trump + gay is far superior to Biden + Kameltoe (or any other configuration of Satanic deepstate cabal members).
He already lost the Christian vote multiple times with his “mean tweets”.
Like, more than half of the evangelical crowd around me still wants Mike Pence to be President instead.
No one is talking about Lake or Noem either. Grenell would be an interesting choice for the lefties. Gay, defeats the identity politics BS.
I would love Ric to be VP. Very intelligent.
Really hoping that this will not be his pick.
I agree. But I can't shake the feeling that it's it. Trump would do this for sure!
If it’s any of the people that have been floated the last several months or even this last day it’ll be a flop.
Personally my criteria is that it needs to be someone that absolutely terrifies the left so that they don’t get any retarded ideas. Like a super maga candidate. One that will not play nice with leftists.
The most balanced, but best comment in the thread getting downvoted....for absolute shame. Shows you exactly the state of what real conservatism looks like in the US of A. Conservatism in the year of our Lord Two thousand and twenty four.....is simply leftism but moving at the speed limit.
People on GAW should know better by now. Controlled opposition continually promotes the leftist/communist/marxist/socialist values no matter which "choice" is presented. That's why we have RINOs, folks.
We need to travel back in time about 120 years in order to actually get what true American conservatism looks like.
I think most Gospel based comments get upvoted on GAW. However, as a newish Christian myself, I've come to understand that much of the Christianity today being preached is a form of cultural Christianity....rather than being counter-culture as we're called to do. The synagogue of satan tiny hat brigade has done quite a number on us, absolutely.
Fully agreed here. However, I will say that there are many Trump supporting conservatives in his base, who are not believers in Christ, that really should be. And the reverse is true of that - there are believers in Christ who should be supporting Trump and they still believe "Orange man bad" fake news lies (I go to a church filled to the brim with them). And that would go back to the way Christianity is preached today, sadly.
I pray he gets delivered from the bond of iniquity. No man is perfect. But I'm not on board because I don't think he can keep MAGA going v
If you are an alcoholic you need deliverance and sin is sin. We all have it. There is therefore now no condemnation to them that are in Christ Jesus.
However if a man thinks God made him that way he isn't sound minded.
You certainly aren't wrong. I think many people that are publicly on Team Trump are not MAGA, with a few exceptions and they are playing the role given in this movie.
I will acknowledge Trump has a knack for uniting people, regardless of what they believe, which is obviously why God called him for our time.
Either way, hard vote no for Grenell as VP.
I'd say there's plenty of people who are truly MAGA, but they simply don't know what it takes to make a country great. Poor theological foundation leads to decent people doing their best to do the right thing, but veering off the path due to lack of knowledge of what that means.
Trump likely picks them since he knows that with him steering the ship, he can still use what they do know to improve things for our country.
I don't know that I'd call the comment balanced...
100% unequivocally and unashamedly accurate, maybe, but not balanced.
Well, to be fair, it's certainly balanced for 120 years ago. But for today it's a hard stance against the perverted ways of the modern world, which is exactly what we need.
It was balanced compared to OGpat's comment lol - I should have tagged him in my post to clarify. But agree with your comment otherwise.
Fair point, he definitely took an even harder, maybe uncharitable stance compared to Vengeance's.
The Bible calls us from a lifestyle of sin, knowing we cannot stop sinning in general. But a lifestyle of sin is strictly forbidden. I’m not saying forgiveness is off the table or anything like that. Romans 8 is a good example, as is Jesus telling people to stop sinning and repent for their sins. They go on to do that if they are followers of Christ and don’t do it when they have no loyalty to Jesus.
You can’t be heartily sorry for the sin of homosexuality while being in an active gay relationship, the same is true for adulterers or thieves… … put in the effort to show your sorrow to your God.
Amen
Gays are not "born", they're MADE.
By older, pedophile gay men molesting young boys.
It blows my mind there are still normies in 2024 that don't realise this (not you).
I have a feeling that Trump will do this. We are in an intel war.
Richard will be is pick because of that in my view.
you made no sense.
Richard was temp DNI right?
Pence.
I would laugh so hard if this happened, ngl.
I like him, apparently he has presidential experience 😂
It's too bad he's gay tho...
Doing a search on this brings up bunch of outlets making their own deductions but Trump hasn't confirmed anything, just dropping hints to whip up the media into frenzy.
For us Anons, as always, its best to wait until the deal is done and not jump at every hint.
Trump knows what he is doing. If he says he knows who it is, then he knows who it is. We can speculate all we want, but there will be a good reason he chooses who he chooses. Whomever that may be, IMHO I think it will shock the world.
There comes a time in the evolution of the progressive agenda when true MAGAs should stop using the "slippery slope" argument because the place we've degenerated to should be condemned as is.
That's our situation today where the hero we're rallying behind to fight the progressive agenda has embraced one of its most insidious and destructive tenets. I'm talking about the Deep States appointment of open and unrepentant homosexual Richard Grenell to the position of acting director of national intelligence.
The insidious and destructive tenet of progressivism I'm referencing is "Sexual Orientation Theory" – a fake science invented by progressive political strategists for the purpose of normalizing LGBT lifestyles and de-normalizing the natural family. It has even less legitimacy than "climate change science."
Even if Richard Grenell kept his sexual proclivities to himself and told people to mind their own business about his private life, he would still be a pedophile enabler. Anyway, his resume falls far short of qualifying him for this position.
But the minute he went public about his homosexual domestic partnership, he became a Marxist change agent, his very presence in public life an argument that a homosexual "orientation" is equivalent to normal sexuality. (Who in American history has ever wanted that goal? It wasn't the conservatives!)
When Grenell did that, he crossed the line from expecting reasonable tolerance from our genuinely magnanimous live-and-let-life society to demanding public acceptance. And in taking that step he also implicitly endorsed the progressive strategy of celebrating his "out" lifestyle as social progress, forcibly integrating it into society, and punishing those who object.
Those are the “Five Stages of Gay Supremacy” I’ve been warning about for thirty years.
Tolerance, Acceptance, Celebration, Forced Participation in “LGBT” Culture, and Punishment of Dissenters.
When Trump Rules, Grenell will be rightly driven to hell
Great comment!!!
Fixed it.
Shitpedia link but the info is there: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Money
PDJT plays a strategic level game against all his tactical opponents. One thing he will look for is the ability to entrench and extend his policies. He will look for the best possible future president within 'real politik" - the realistic ability to be electedand to both lead and govern.
I don't think Grenell is that guy.
Homosexuality is not a Christian or traditional American value!!! If he picks a GAY then I am selling my DWAC immediately and withdrawing from political discourse. We are already on the edge with this ESG-DEI garbage. Praying it is NOT Grenell!!! Praying against Sodom&Gomorah 2.0
Sarah Sanders I’d wager bigly
Nope. My money is on Tim Scott. He is gearing up for the optics... he just got engaged. KEK
I don't think it'll be Grenell and I don't put any stock into anything Gorka says.
Grenell will be great in a similar role to what he had last time.
Whoever Trump picks will need to be hardcore MAGA and someone who can go on the attack, although that does describe Grenell. Once happenings start taking place and Trump takes office there's going to be absolute chaos. Trump will need an effective communicator who is firmly on board with "the plan".
Conventional thinking means Trump picks somebody from a swing state he needs to win or a demographic he needs to improve with (why you hear so many female candidates), but this isn't going to be the time for that.
i was just telling my wife last night that Trump needs to make Grenell ,AG, I never cared that he's gay cause he's a badass IMO,and if you remember he did the voice over on a video back in 21 cant find it now,it was called ,'THE PRESIDENT DONALD J TRUMP THAT YOU DONT KNOW,it was the one showing him going on his world tour and all the shit he had on all of them
Grenell doesn’t push it or flaunt it. Smart and quick on his feet. Loyal. I would not oppose the pick.
Would be very pleased if Grenell was the VP pick.
Has defended DJT daily for 8 years. Highly intelligent, articulate and it would drive the Left insane if President Trump had an openly gay man as his VP.
Remember after 2020 election google had Ric Grenell listed as POTUS for a day or two?
Yes I do.
Nice, time to close the loop, and finish the op.
General Flynn for VP. Who's talking about him?
Kennedy, and not the ones known to be alive.....(in reality he already is VP)
VP pick wasn’t announced until July in 2016.
While I really like Rick Grenell, he would not bring anything to the ticket besides his intelligence. He is not "gay enough" for the lgbtqdkjdofbdsxyz people. I still think POTUS will choose Ben Carson.
Nothing chosen.. Richard isn’t even on the gambling site and they have guys like Kanye, they even have ivanka.. favorite is kristi noem +430, Vivek +640, Ben Carlson +750, Nikki Hayley +1200, Tucker Carlson +2200.. list goes on..
Elise
It will be General Mike Flynn. Military drafted Trump, Military will expose the Swamp with Trump. We will need to re-establish trust with the American people when the true depth of the corruption is exposed. I trust military over any politician to lead us after Trump’s 4 years. We were close to losing the game. There is a reason why we will be seeing his Bio-Documentary shortly.
0 chance.. he fired him from his cabinet.. would be a bad look..
He PARDONED him. Flynn has been persecuted just Like Trump has. Trump has always told Flynn to get ready to serve. If one reads the Q posts, it is obvious.
Ok I’ll come back when trump announces vp and I’ll ask you what went wrong
Fair enough. I’ll show you my concerned face.
WWG1WGA
Why would Girls know?