Eliminate cancer? Eliminate the pathogens, avoid intoxicants, DETOX, excercise, sunlight, live with INTEGRITY in service to others. Love as we were instructed.
Exactly what I stated above - make better choices.
I realize a lot of people are ignorant or naive about processed foods, and how badly things are tainted in the fields. Hopefully, RFK Jr can make some strides towards better education, and how to make good choices.
I've never trusted Elon as far as his opinions on the future of mankind and the human body. His work on transhumanism is a big turn off for me. If Trump can do a good job of keeping his people properly compartmentalized, we should be OK. Keep Elon out of HHS. Keep RFK Jr away from energy and the 2nd amendment.
I agree with everything you say, but I'm pretty sure one can live a perfect life, eat a perfect diet, follow all of the protocols and still get and die from cancer. Just the shit they dump on our heads every day is potentially enough to overwhelm all good efforts. And that is just a fraction of what we are exposed to.
Elon's sudden acceptance by those relatively in the know has troubled me always. RFK too. And others. Hope is getting worn out in this noggin.
He's a science guy. He thinks with a logical brain. Are ALL vaccines bad? No. Are ALL mRNA drugs bad? Probably not. They are likely getting a bad rap b/c they're the easiest to weaponize? Regardless, I have a lizard brain and my immediate fight or flight response to mRNA stuff is to flee. They'll have a long way to go to gain public support/adoptance again.
Q specifically said “not all” in regards to vaccines. If you put any weight behind any of what is talked about on this board you should consider that maybe they aren’t or weren’t all bad. As with most good things the cabal hijacks it and inverts it for evil.
Perhaps as an emergency measure, but making everyone give the rabies shot to their pets is just as much a con as any of them. All vaccines are harmful. On occasion, the harm of the vaccine is outweighed by the harm of the thing being vaccinated against. Not a chance I put anything in my dog that is not absolutely necessary. There is a reason that the lifespan of dogs is on the decline. It's not just the shttty food. The odds of my dog getting rabies is near zero while the odds of adverse reactions are exponentially increaed by me giving him unnecessary shots.
If you dig deep enough you will find that every plague that they claim to have eradicated via vaccine was either a plague because of a vaccine, or went away as it ran it's natural course. Natural foods in a complete diet and targeted food intake are the best vaccines/cures.
You are talking about 2 different issues.
I was speaking about one.
I was responding to "all vaccines are bad" - a vaccine is a method that is not inherently bad.
Can pharma companies do bad things via a vaccine, sure, but that would be an abuse of that method...just like pain killers can be abused by addicts doesn't mean pain killers are bad.
But, you are adding into my comment forced or compelled use. I spoke nothing about this.
I only addressed the false statement "all vaccines are bad."
And this is coming from someone who hasn't had a vaccine since I was a minor decades ago.
Because I don't trust pharma (seperate from the mechanism of a true vaccine).
The rabies “vaccine” is typically only given on an as-needed basis after an incident where rabies exposure might have happened.
It’s more of a medicative treatment flying under the name “vaccine” at that point.
The tetanus “vaccine” is.. for starters tetanus is a bacteria transmitted through feces. So essentially the tetanus vaccine could easily be a thing to help expulse deteriorating feces from the body.
Just for a couple examples. Most people, when they say “vaccines” are referring to the childhood schedule or regular annual vaccines such as flu or the new coof one.
Hmm. Interesting.
I guess I don't think "childhood vaccine schedule" or the "Chyna virus" when someone says all vaccines are a scam. To me, that is a comment about the technology's mechanics rather than specifically coof or child jabs.
It doesn't matter if one says "...but the rabies vaccine is more like a medicine..." That infact, proves my point... Vaccines are various formulas/distributions etc...
Further, the jibby jab isn't a vaccine.
Words matter.
For example, I couldn't say that vaccines made outside of America or rather, not made for Americans, are even the same.
For example... "Cucumber vaccine USA" maybe different than "Cucumber vaccine Sweden" ...
Vaccines aren't American. They are a technology with proprietary recipes.
Vaccines exist even if coof or the child schedule doesn't.
And, again dissemination is different than production.
So to say "all vaccines are bad" us overly generalized and not factual.
i think this vax injury event was intentional, to scare people away from using future mrna therapies, for life extension etc. The athletes dropping on the field, media talking heads keeling over live on air, I mean come ON.
I’m off topic here but mentioning firearms had me thinking..were firearm’s invented originally more for war or for hunting. Doing a bit of looking it’s clear firearms were for war. Killing humans. Then eventually trickling down to killing large game, etc. So these shots or mRNA affecting vaccines may have terrible consequences early, eventually could become helpful. It’s the in between that’s scary. But as you said, what was meant for evil, be used for good. And that’s right out of scripture. It’s what God can do. Make the enemies weapons work for good.
I think it depends on your definition of firearms.
I am assuming throwing rocks were first, then spears, then maybe slings, then bows and arrows, etc.
Firearms in my mind are something that involves projecting something, as opposed to holding on to, like a stick, club, or sword.
Now, with the advent of what we call gunpowder, one could make a case that this led to the first gun. But hunting and warring assuredly occurred before the gun.
In fact, the very first animal slain with a weapon may have led to warring over who got to eat it. With weapons in hand the hunters may have become warriors on the spot. I would imagine both were very hungry. They may have even been hangry.
Without looking it up I would think the word “fire” in firearms would refer to the lighting of something. Fire contact, ignite, explosion, projectile. In particular, yes gunpowder. Really all they did is say “this cannon works great, let’s make it smaller”. And of course as it became smaller the uses became more. Couldn’t kill game with a cannon, practically. Couldn’t assassinate with them.
The first firearms originated in 10th-century China, when bamboo tubes containing gunpowder and pellet projectiles were mounted on spears to make the portable fire lance,[4] operable by a single person, which was later used effectively as a shock weapon in the siege of De'an in 1132. In the 13th century, fire lance barrels were replaced with metal tubes and transformed into the metal-barreled hand cannon.[5] The technology gradually spread throughout Eurasia during the 14th century. Older firearms typically used black powder as a propellant, but modern firearms use smokeless powder or other explosive propellants. Most modern firearms (with the notable exception of smoothbore shotguns) have rifled barrels to impart spin to the projectile for improved flight stability.
I've never heard of a "fire lance" before, but that sounds pretty cool!
And, I have always loved the term Hand Cannon for a high-caliber pistol. I usually think of the .44 Magnum or the .50 Cal Desert Eagle for the Hand Cannon type of pistol. LOL.
LoL. “Shooting from the hip!” Excellent play on words for our conversation. Yea we’re digging on a subject cause it grabbed us, we were just sitting here! 😂. Yea we need to stop, we gonna derail the whole topic. But awesome info. I’m thinking that’s perhaps where the term hand cannon came from…..great, now I’m gonna be looking that up, lol. Stop it!
I believe that dicking around with RNA/DNA is a recipe for disaster. We weren't meant to live forever, and any medical advances that allow a person to not hold themselves responsible for their own actions is bad. You want to increase your chances of living a longer, healthier life? - Make better choices.
I don't think that experimenting with genetics would ever allow us to live forever
I believe that all of the lifestyle choices that have a relation to cancer are not causes, but rather triggers/accelerators, the problem is genetic, otherwise there would be no cases of cancer on people who take care of themselves, and such is not the case.
People would still have to face many consequences for bad lifestyle choices, but at least they wouldn't have to worry about getting cancer out of the blue just because they have the wrong genes.
I still believe that tampering at the genetic level is akin to playing God, and in my opinion, we are courting disaster if we continue to do so.
I know many cancers are due to outside factors (chemicals, radiation, drugs, etc.), many are viral, and now we're learning that some may be parasitic in origin. I'm not a scientist, and am certainly no theologian, so i can't speak as to why so many young children end up with horrible cancers and other diseases, but I do know that I do not trust modern day medicines, nor the pharmaceutical industries.
I'm not trying to belittle you, or your opinions, but just wanted to point out my take on things. It's OK if we disagree.
From my perspective I think it absolutely could be useful in the right hands, if the RNA coding is done by someone who is not a psychopathic dark occultist who worships satan and hates humanity, the results should be positive.
That textbook is out of date. Most of the "junk" DNA is actually immune response markers, parts of pathogen DNA stored in order to recognize them again later. It is genetic memory for the immune system.
To eliminate cancer, 1,stop the childhood vaccines, 2, eat real food (not the stuff from boxes, eliminate seed oils and most sugars), get rid of household toxins, get regular exercise, get some sunlight, and RELAX.
Not disagreeing those are great ideas but remember that cancer is not a modern thing and it was around long before we started polluting our planet and our bodies. First human cancer diagnosis was in ancient Egypt 3000 years ago and even earlier evidence from dinosaur fossils.
The idea is to give yourself the best health so as to not get cancer, or to survive it if you do get it.
What has caused the explosion of cancers in our time?
The mRNA will always be bad in any form whatsoever because it fundamentally changes ones DNA makeup! This is against God's creation and I believe the very reason God had to destroy mankind and animal kind with the Great Flood! Elon, Trump, and the entirety of Trump's cabinet are made up of flawed men. It's that plain and simple and they all need to be held to account by We The People! I realize most on the board and the Mods in particular literally believe that Trump in infallible and has elevated him to godlike status...which if that keeps up is a sure fire way to sabotage Trump's success because God will not share His glory with ANYONE! That said, those of us who don't worship men...need to keep Elon, Trump, etc. in line and not allow the kind of crap to go on this time that went on last time...so far, so good, but we need to be vigilant!
Also, ALL modern vaccines are BAD simply because in this day and age, the manufactures are not telling us the truth about what's in them. Most, if not all are designed to damage to the human body! Why else would they lace them with mercury, thimerosal and other carcinogenic substances? Until there is some accountability with big pharma, we cannot trust ANY vaccines!
Apr 12, 2023 - that was like a lifetime ago... he's probably had enough discussions with RFK Jr to change his mind here. But if you look at the "credible" reports and peer-reviewed-scam-$ papers still being pumped out in 2022 pushing mRNA its not hard to see how he posted this. And, like guns, its the shooter or, in this case, the perpetrators of the scamdemic vax that twisted what very well may be a good medical treatment into something harmful.
Surest way to cure cancer is stop vaccines, put the entire population on several antiparasitic meds, clean up our food water and air. There. I fixed it.
EVERY technology that has ever existed has been misused and every technology yet to be created WILL be misused.
We have only seen mostly the bad uses of mRNA, doesn't mean that there aren't good uses for it as well.
But just like children(or adults for that matter) who's first encounter with a gun has been it being used against them tend to become gun-shy and hate guns, people having only seen the bad side of mRNA tech have caused them to fear and hate it.
We all know that this isn't the full picture when it comes to guns, and the same hold just as true with mRNA(or any other tech)....
(bearing in mind that there is also a narrative progression in play here so there are things he currently can't blurt out about what else was in those 'vaccines'...)
Not bad if it keeps on getting studied until we perhaps start to actually understand it.
If for no other reason than because somebody somewhere is probably going to keep doing that anyway, and there is always the risk that there might be some use for it as a terrorist weapon or to be used in war. So we'd better understand the whole thing as well as possible whether we use it or not.
But no rushing to use it on ourselves. Especially not for anything that can be dealt with in other ways, but it might be useful, one day, at least for dealing with something like those conditions that are due to defects in the DNA of the person. Marfan Syndrome, Osteogenesis Imperfecta, Haemophilia...
Listen, think about the damage the shots caused.
Now flip that. If the tech can go into trusted/audited hands then im sure there is a massive amount of good that tOULD come from it. Thats really all i could say. Very few people can actually be trusted. Unfortunately with mrna and after covid, for me, elon musk isnt even one of those people atm.
Eliminate cancer? Eliminate the pathogens, avoid intoxicants, DETOX, excercise, sunlight, live with INTEGRITY in service to others. Love as we were instructed.
Exactly what I stated above - make better choices.
I realize a lot of people are ignorant or naive about processed foods, and how badly things are tainted in the fields. Hopefully, RFK Jr can make some strides towards better education, and how to make good choices.
I've never trusted Elon as far as his opinions on the future of mankind and the human body. His work on transhumanism is a big turn off for me. If Trump can do a good job of keeping his people properly compartmentalized, we should be OK. Keep Elon out of HHS. Keep RFK Jr away from energy and the 2nd amendment.
I agree with everything you say, but I'm pretty sure one can live a perfect life, eat a perfect diet, follow all of the protocols and still get and die from cancer. Just the shit they dump on our heads every day is potentially enough to overwhelm all good efforts. And that is just a fraction of what we are exposed to.
Elon's sudden acceptance by those relatively in the know has troubled me always. RFK too. And others. Hope is getting worn out in this noggin.
Q told us to protect our DNA. mRNA seems contrary to protecting our DNA.
Wasn't a WEF Demon spouting about hijacking the human experience via DNA?
He's a science guy. He thinks with a logical brain. Are ALL vaccines bad? No. Are ALL mRNA drugs bad? Probably not. They are likely getting a bad rap b/c they're the easiest to weaponize? Regardless, I have a lizard brain and my immediate fight or flight response to mRNA stuff is to flee. They'll have a long way to go to gain public support/adoptance again.
All vaccines are bad. Yes.
A Con and Fraud from the start.
Q specifically said “not all” in regards to vaccines. If you put any weight behind any of what is talked about on this board you should consider that maybe they aren’t or weren’t all bad. As with most good things the cabal hijacks it and inverts it for evil.
Q post 1010:
No, not all vaccines are bad. Damn yall. Let's talk the rabies vaccine. Bad? Absolutely not.
Perhaps as an emergency measure, but making everyone give the rabies shot to their pets is just as much a con as any of them. All vaccines are harmful. On occasion, the harm of the vaccine is outweighed by the harm of the thing being vaccinated against. Not a chance I put anything in my dog that is not absolutely necessary. There is a reason that the lifespan of dogs is on the decline. It's not just the shttty food. The odds of my dog getting rabies is near zero while the odds of adverse reactions are exponentially increaed by me giving him unnecessary shots.
If you dig deep enough you will find that every plague that they claim to have eradicated via vaccine was either a plague because of a vaccine, or went away as it ran it's natural course. Natural foods in a complete diet and targeted food intake are the best vaccines/cures.
You are talking about 2 different issues. I was speaking about one. I was responding to "all vaccines are bad" - a vaccine is a method that is not inherently bad. Can pharma companies do bad things via a vaccine, sure, but that would be an abuse of that method...just like pain killers can be abused by addicts doesn't mean pain killers are bad.
But, you are adding into my comment forced or compelled use. I spoke nothing about this. I only addressed the false statement "all vaccines are bad."
And this is coming from someone who hasn't had a vaccine since I was a minor decades ago.
Because I don't trust pharma (seperate from the mechanism of a true vaccine).
True. The concept of vaccines is good.
The rabies “vaccine” is typically only given on an as-needed basis after an incident where rabies exposure might have happened.
It’s more of a medicative treatment flying under the name “vaccine” at that point.
The tetanus “vaccine” is.. for starters tetanus is a bacteria transmitted through feces. So essentially the tetanus vaccine could easily be a thing to help expulse deteriorating feces from the body.
Just for a couple examples. Most people, when they say “vaccines” are referring to the childhood schedule or regular annual vaccines such as flu or the new coof one.
Hmm. Interesting. I guess I don't think "childhood vaccine schedule" or the "Chyna virus" when someone says all vaccines are a scam. To me, that is a comment about the technology's mechanics rather than specifically coof or child jabs.
It doesn't matter if one says "...but the rabies vaccine is more like a medicine..." That infact, proves my point... Vaccines are various formulas/distributions etc... Further, the jibby jab isn't a vaccine. Words matter.
For example, I couldn't say that vaccines made outside of America or rather, not made for Americans, are even the same.
For example... "Cucumber vaccine USA" maybe different than "Cucumber vaccine Sweden" ...
Vaccines aren't American. They are a technology with proprietary recipes.
Vaccines exist even if coof or the child schedule doesn't.
And, again dissemination is different than production.
So to say "all vaccines are bad" us overly generalized and not factual.
Yes!
i think this vax injury event was intentional, to scare people away from using future mrna therapies, for life extension etc. The athletes dropping on the field, media talking heads keeling over live on air, I mean come ON.
The mrna platform has never successfully been proven safe, which is why it was never used prior to this plandemic..... All animals died during trials.
Just because vermin used a certain technology for evil, doesn't mean it couldn't be used for good.
A firearm can be used to slaughter innocents, or save them, depends on how and who uses it.
I’m off topic here but mentioning firearms had me thinking..were firearm’s invented originally more for war or for hunting. Doing a bit of looking it’s clear firearms were for war. Killing humans. Then eventually trickling down to killing large game, etc. So these shots or mRNA affecting vaccines may have terrible consequences early, eventually could become helpful. It’s the in between that’s scary. But as you said, what was meant for evil, be used for good. And that’s right out of scripture. It’s what God can do. Make the enemies weapons work for good.
I think it depends on your definition of firearms.
I am assuming throwing rocks were first, then spears, then maybe slings, then bows and arrows, etc.
Firearms in my mind are something that involves projecting something, as opposed to holding on to, like a stick, club, or sword.
Now, with the advent of what we call gunpowder, one could make a case that this led to the first gun. But hunting and warring assuredly occurred before the gun.
In fact, the very first animal slain with a weapon may have led to warring over who got to eat it. With weapons in hand the hunters may have become warriors on the spot. I would imagine both were very hungry. They may have even been hangry.
Without looking it up I would think the word “fire” in firearms would refer to the lighting of something. Fire contact, ignite, explosion, projectile. In particular, yes gunpowder. Really all they did is say “this cannon works great, let’s make it smaller”. And of course as it became smaller the uses became more. Couldn’t kill game with a cannon, practically. Couldn’t assassinate with them.
I think we've uncovered a fun little historical exploration here, fren!
I didn't look up anything before either. I was "shooting from the hip."
Check this out though,
I've never heard of a "fire lance" before, but that sounds pretty cool!
And, I have always loved the term Hand Cannon for a high-caliber pistol. I usually think of the .44 Magnum or the .50 Cal Desert Eagle for the Hand Cannon type of pistol. LOL.
LoL. “Shooting from the hip!” Excellent play on words for our conversation. Yea we’re digging on a subject cause it grabbed us, we were just sitting here! 😂. Yea we need to stop, we gonna derail the whole topic. But awesome info. I’m thinking that’s perhaps where the term hand cannon came from…..great, now I’m gonna be looking that up, lol. Stop it!
A long road to building trust
A very long road indeed
But the potential benefits can't be discarded out of hand, even if it takes 100 years for the technology to reach that point
I believe that dicking around with RNA/DNA is a recipe for disaster. We weren't meant to live forever, and any medical advances that allow a person to not hold themselves responsible for their own actions is bad. You want to increase your chances of living a longer, healthier life? - Make better choices.
This is my opinion. Your mileage may vary.
I don't think that experimenting with genetics would ever allow us to live forever
I believe that all of the lifestyle choices that have a relation to cancer are not causes, but rather triggers/accelerators, the problem is genetic, otherwise there would be no cases of cancer on people who take care of themselves, and such is not the case.
People would still have to face many consequences for bad lifestyle choices, but at least they wouldn't have to worry about getting cancer out of the blue just because they have the wrong genes.
I still believe that tampering at the genetic level is akin to playing God, and in my opinion, we are courting disaster if we continue to do so.
I know many cancers are due to outside factors (chemicals, radiation, drugs, etc.), many are viral, and now we're learning that some may be parasitic in origin. I'm not a scientist, and am certainly no theologian, so i can't speak as to why so many young children end up with horrible cancers and other diseases, but I do know that I do not trust modern day medicines, nor the pharmaceutical industries.
I'm not trying to belittle you, or your opinions, but just wanted to point out my take on things. It's OK if we disagree.
From my perspective I think it absolutely could be useful in the right hands, if the RNA coding is done by someone who is not a psychopathic dark occultist who worships satan and hates humanity, the results should be positive.
What if that 90% is unlocked by actually being faithful to God?
Like when the tongues of fire came upon everyone in the upper room, for instance…
Have you seen DNA used to store digital data?
https://wyss.harvard.edu/technology/dna-data-storage/
That textbook is out of date. Most of the "junk" DNA is actually immune response markers, parts of pathogen DNA stored in order to recognize them again later. It is genetic memory for the immune system.
To eliminate cancer, 1,stop the childhood vaccines, 2, eat real food (not the stuff from boxes, eliminate seed oils and most sugars), get rid of household toxins, get regular exercise, get some sunlight, and RELAX.
Not disagreeing those are great ideas but remember that cancer is not a modern thing and it was around long before we started polluting our planet and our bodies. First human cancer diagnosis was in ancient Egypt 3000 years ago and even earlier evidence from dinosaur fossils.
Parasite idea perhaps?
The idea is to give yourself the best health so as to not get cancer, or to survive it if you do get it. What has caused the explosion of cancers in our time?
Why did he post this nonsense? Have a look at the 1931 Nobel Prise for medicine Elon.....
To be fair, it IS a year and a half old post. People have learned a lot since then.
ivermectin/fenben already do this
Elon loves bio humanism. He wants us all connected to neural link. What did you expect?
No thanks lol
There's nothing synthetic that's any good for you. Remember that and you'll never have to worry about cancer in the first place.
I look forward to his battle with RFK Jr
Old post to bring discord in the ranks. Elon and Vivek are on DOGE, so I will keep my prayers focused on that for them.
Even if he does consider mRNA as a positive, he is not talking about forcing or sneaking it into my body.
This is counterintelligence, more will be inbound as the deep state resists dismantling.
So ALL of humanity can walk around with frankenclots?!
Umm... NOOOO STANK YOU!
Color me surprised. But over my dead body would I put any of that garbage in myself. And I'm a cancer survivor
The mRNA will always be bad in any form whatsoever because it fundamentally changes ones DNA makeup! This is against God's creation and I believe the very reason God had to destroy mankind and animal kind with the Great Flood! Elon, Trump, and the entirety of Trump's cabinet are made up of flawed men. It's that plain and simple and they all need to be held to account by We The People! I realize most on the board and the Mods in particular literally believe that Trump in infallible and has elevated him to godlike status...which if that keeps up is a sure fire way to sabotage Trump's success because God will not share His glory with ANYONE! That said, those of us who don't worship men...need to keep Elon, Trump, etc. in line and not allow the kind of crap to go on this time that went on last time...so far, so good, but we need to be vigilant!
Also, ALL modern vaccines are BAD simply because in this day and age, the manufactures are not telling us the truth about what's in them. Most, if not all are designed to damage to the human body! Why else would they lace them with mercury, thimerosal and other carcinogenic substances? Until there is some accountability with big pharma, we cannot trust ANY vaccines!
When some of the highest paid employees at a pharmaceutical company are its attorneys, you know something evil is lurking within.
Apr 12, 2023 - that was like a lifetime ago... he's probably had enough discussions with RFK Jr to change his mind here. But if you look at the "credible" reports and peer-reviewed-scam-$ papers still being pumped out in 2022 pushing mRNA its not hard to see how he posted this. And, like guns, its the shooter or, in this case, the perpetrators of the scamdemic vax that twisted what very well may be a good medical treatment into something harmful.
Good point, this was posted awhile ago.
No way in hell, EM!
Surest way to cure cancer is stop vaccines, put the entire population on several antiparasitic meds, clean up our food water and air. There. I fixed it.
There is one simple cure with one word for all diseases including cancer - ALKALIZE. Cancer cells won't survive in alkaline environment.
No thanks Elon, I'll pass. I don't want anything synthetic injected into my body.
I doubt RFK would allow this shit.
Fine, just don't ask us to line up for it.
Treating cancer is too big of a money maker to have a cure. That is why they never used Ivermectin. Too cheap of a drug and had a chance of helping.
I know this isn't popular around here, but i don't like elon. I think he's bad news.
I'm pretty much right there with you. I like a lot of the things that Elon has done, but I don't trust him any further than I can throw him.
Yep, on the surface he's doing all good. But i have a very bad feeling.
They're all bad news. Some news is just worse than other news.
What's his Mars plan? Oh that's right it only includes 1 million people. What about the rest of us?? Don't be fooled!
Well, he is not the Health Secretary!
Every technology have good uses, and bad uses.
EVERY technology that has ever existed has been misused and every technology yet to be created WILL be misused.
We have only seen mostly the bad uses of mRNA, doesn't mean that there aren't good uses for it as well.
But just like children(or adults for that matter) who's first encounter with a gun has been it being used against them tend to become gun-shy and hate guns, people having only seen the bad side of mRNA tech have caused them to fear and hate it.
We all know that this isn't the full picture when it comes to guns, and the same hold just as true with mRNA(or any other tech)....
(bearing in mind that there is also a narrative progression in play here so there are things he currently can't blurt out about what else was in those 'vaccines'...)
its shit like this that makes me thing Elon is either a really lucky or really part of their club. hes never struck me as a genius.
APRIL 12, 2023.
Has this changed?!
Not bad if it keeps on getting studied until we perhaps start to actually understand it.
If for no other reason than because somebody somewhere is probably going to keep doing that anyway, and there is always the risk that there might be some use for it as a terrorist weapon or to be used in war. So we'd better understand the whole thing as well as possible whether we use it or not.
But no rushing to use it on ourselves. Especially not for anything that can be dealt with in other ways, but it might be useful, one day, at least for dealing with something like those conditions that are due to defects in the DNA of the person. Marfan Syndrome, Osteogenesis Imperfecta, Haemophilia...
Listen, think about the damage the shots caused. Now flip that. If the tech can go into trusted/audited hands then im sure there is a massive amount of good that tOULD come from it. Thats really all i could say. Very few people can actually be trusted. Unfortunately with mrna and after covid, for me, elon musk isnt even one of those people atm.
See, fuck all that shit dude. Bro trying to bring on The Mark n' shit and doesn't even realize it. Or maybe he does.
The mRNA will eliminate humanity. It changes your DNA. I prefer to stay analog there Elon!
Is he aware of the turbo cancers connected to the mRNA death jab.
I did seen one person that was fighting cancer and took vaccines and it does cure cancer for him.
But another person did took vaccines and have lung cancer…
So I think not all vaccines the same, and there might be placebo and some has different levels of poisons and different type of virus and cures