And Pornhub will be excluded from social media restrictions... Why, exactly?
(twitter.com)
- N C S W I C -
Comments (52)
sorted by:
Ethical Capital Partners is a Canadian private equity firm best known for its acquisition of Aylo, the owner of Pornhub.
Get it? "Ethical Capital Partners"! "Ethical"? Talk about newspeak.....
The owner is a Rabbi living in Ottawa.
I believe you are correct!
HIDING BEHIND THAT RELIGION...and WHY IS THAT???
Can't but NOTICE that anything that concerns Israel and such always comes back to bite us in the a$$...they are NOT forth-coming of their intentions and ARE ALWAYS SUBVERTING the United States in someway!!!!!!!!!
Me thinks, that when PDJT gets into office, there needs to be a HEART-TO-HEART WITH THE ISRAELI PM...Just a thought!!!
Yep! Research AIPAC! Research dual US/Israeli citizenship held by our Senators/Reps. Yes there's a lot of "hiding behind that religion"! They have convinced Christians that the modern state of Israel is the Israel of our Bible. Research Scofield Reference Bible and John Nelson Darby. Which group funded that Christian Reference Bible that put "Israel" as the fulfillment of Bible prophecy?
Exactly what I thought, “the religion” maybe a demon cult?
As I see it there are only 2 types of people in the world: Those who embrace Jesus Christ and those who reject Christ. All who reject Christ are by definition (according to the Apostle John in 1st & 2nd John) "Antichrist". That is, they are opposed to Christ. When the religious leaders of Jesus day claimed that Abraham was their father how did Jesus answer them? Jesus said: "You belong to your father the devil" - John 8:44!
Every Single Time
These demons are sick.
According to this X post the purpose of the legislation is to supposedly protect children! Yet a website like Pornhub WON'T fall under the restrictions provided by (63C) of the Social Media Minimum Age Bill!
Is it "authoritarian" for parents NOT to want their children exposed to porn? You bet it is! Parents should be "authoritarian" when it comes to protecting their children.
Get the government off the internet. Parents being the authority in their home is one thing. But said parents don’t want to patrol their children’s internet. They want the government to do it and it sounds like you support it. Are you an idiot?
Name calling are we? At what age should parents let their children on the internet? So you are the type of parent that won't "patrol" what their children access on line? So you acknowledge that parents are "the authority in their home" yet they shouldn't patrol their children's internet usage?
That's up to the parents to decide for their own families, not the nanny state's. Parents absolutely should parent.
The Supreme Court has ruled that, “transmitting obscenity and child pornography, whether via the Internet or other means, is... illegal under federal law for both adults and juveniles.” -Reno v. ACLU, 521 U.S. 844 (1998).....keep reading more on this subject at: https://www.justice.gov/criminal/criminal-ceos/obscenity.
"Parents to decide for their own families"? Seems like the Supreme Court has already decided! As a parent & grandparent I want the law enforced.
I was exposed to pornography as a child, left alone to the internet, in the early 2000s. While it had some pull when I was younger and curious, thank God I’m not an addict. However, I know MANY PEOPLE exposed to pornography as a child and it brought some very serious consequences. Erectile dysfunction IS A SIDE EFFECT OF PORNOGRAPHY ABUSE. But “oh no! Don’t take muh pron” 😑
I've been wondering about all the erectile dysfunction ads on TV. I couldn't believe there could be that many people with that problem, but now, it all makes sense!
Porn, plus processed foods, plus fluoride in our drinking water plus.....childhood vaccines, plus.....
Not to mention the "grooming" aspect. The seeds of perversion get planted deep in a child's soul making them targets for some very evil people.
AND that is what leads to --->DEGRADATION OF OUR SOCIETY!!!!!!!!...
Great post Rootcause!!!!
(((who))) owns PornHub now?
Joooos
Who owns Pornhub? Follow the $$!
https://www.newsweek.com/who-owns-pornhub-netflix-money-shot-documentary-1787861
A simple solution would be to have websites end in .xxx instead of .com. Then any .xxx site can be blocked with ease.
Any media sites that end with anything else would be subject to the same rules as everyone
If .xxx domain registrations were as cheap as .com, there would be more of them. It comes down to cost. It's about 10 times more just in wholesale cost.
Sticky...
Australia it shames me to say. Got some real retards running things down here at the moment. I do wonder how long its going to take to fix Australia.
MAGA - Make Australia Great Again!
Does anyone get the joke that I did with the flair.... Anyone? 😂👌
Is it because PH is NOT a social media site? Maybe I don't know how PH works (not a fan), but it seems most social media are places where people go to exchange ideas, to chat, and to interact with other people. I always thought PH was just a place to peruse porn. Am I wrong about that?
Sorry, no, it's a bit more stupid of a joke
There is a comment section on each video in which people can interact. I don't think it's any different than YouTube in that regard. I wouldn't want to interact in that community but I'd definitely consider it to be "social media"
Everyone defends porn because it is fun but yeah, they never want to acknowledge any downsides of it.
I meant my original deleted comment for a different thread but you’re right! Almost every video is of a woman being sex trafficked but the evil in people makes them turn a blind eye.
Most MSM news sites have comment sections too. But Idk if I'd consider it social media
Oh... well, OK then. So I'm almost loathe to ask, but do people "hook up" there on PH? Or is it that kind of chat?
God, I hope not. mostly people getting off on talking nasty and sharing the names of actors, but who tf knows what transpires in private messaging
So the answer is "yes"! It's a conduit for social interaction - private messaging.
It appears that the flair is no longer there.
I don't see it, was it removed?
Unless that is the joke...!?!? But that seems too galaxy brain.
Fixed, added it, thank you for letting me know
Because its a website, not a social media platform. Besides, its the parents' jobs to police what their children are doing. All these bootlickers claiming to be conservative but want Uncle Sam to do their most important job for them....seems a lil inconsistent.
The Supreme Court has ruled that, “transmitting obscenity and child pornography, whether via the Internet or other means, is... illegal under federal law for both adults and juveniles.” -Reno v. ACLU, 521 U.S. 844 (1998).....keep reading more on this subject at: https://www.justice.gov/criminal/criminal-ceos/obscenity.
Seems like the "bootlickers" at the Supreme Court has already decided! As a parent & grandparent I want the law enforced.
It's been said that "you can't legislate morality". In reality that's the only thing you can legislate. Don't we have laws against murder, lying, stealing, etc? Isn't that morality? Don't those laws reflect the 10 commandants? At least in part? So the question really is whose morality will you legislate?
Totally weird.
Cuz da Joos
Wth is 63C and why don't they link it?
Will it require Communities.Win to validate users identities when signing up for an account?
You people really ought not to support such bills under the guise of wont somebody think of the children. Those are some of the worse bills to be passed.
piss offf with your authoritarian bullshit. Keep that up and Trump will lose 2028 and cabal will regain power.
Sincerely, -A libertarian that's lent you and Trump support since 2015 and that will retract that support as soon as you all go the wrong direction.
so kids should have unlimited access to porn, but not unlimited access on non porn sites? just wondering, don't shoot me...
Here’s the real problem: giving the government any authority to block any access to the internet. This whole program needs to be shut down.
Whoops. This user has been sent outside for 3 days to touch grass. Let's hope it helps.
How does what you just said make any sense in the context presented?