And Pornhub will be excluded from social media restrictions... Why, exactly?
(twitter.com)
- N C S W I C -
Comments (98)
sorted by:
Ethical Capital Partners is a Canadian private equity firm best known for its acquisition of Aylo, the owner of Pornhub.
Get it? "Ethical Capital Partners"! "Ethical"? Talk about newspeak.....
The owner is a Rabbi living in Ottawa.
I believe you are correct!
HIDING BEHIND THAT RELIGION...and WHY IS THAT???
Can't but NOTICE that anything that concerns Israel and such always comes back to bite us in the a$$...they are NOT forth-coming of their intentions and ARE ALWAYS SUBVERTING the United States in someway!!!!!!!!!
Me thinks, that when PDJT gets into office, there needs to be a HEART-TO-HEART WITH THE ISRAELI PM...Just a thought!!!
Yep! Research AIPAC! Research dual US/Israeli citizenship held by our Senators/Reps. Yes there's a lot of "hiding behind that religion"! They have convinced Christians that the modern state of Israel is the Israel of our Bible. Research Scofield Reference Bible and John Nelson Darby. Which group funded that Christian Reference Bible that put "Israel" as the fulfillment of Bible prophecy?
We are Israel- The people of God. Not some made up khazarian political country with a title slapped on it to subvert the world.
I agree 110%! The Apostle Paul gives us the correct definition of what it means to be a "Jew" and part of the "Israel".
"For he is not a Jew who is one outwardly, nor is circumcision that which is outward in the flesh; 29but he is a Jew who is one inwardly; and circumcision is that of the heart, in the Spirit, not in the letter; whose [g]praise is not from men but from God." - Romans 2:28-29.
"For they are not all Israel, which are of Israel: 7Neither, because they are the seed of Abraham, are they all children: but, In Isaac shall thy seed be called. 8That is, They which are the children of the flesh, these are not the children of God: but the children of the promise are counted for the seed." Romans 9-6-9
Exactly what I thought, “the religion” maybe a demon cult?
As I see it there are only 2 types of people in the world: Those who embrace Jesus Christ and those who reject Christ. All who reject Christ are by definition (according to the Apostle John in 1st & 2nd John) "Antichrist". That is, they are opposed to Christ. When the religious leaders of Jesus day claimed that Abraham was their father how did Jesus answer them? Jesus said: "You belong to your father the devil" - John 8:44!
amen
Agreed.
Not a "heart to heart", more like a "Come to Jesus" type of discussion.
Need a Constitutional Amendment forbidding any member of government at ANY level, from dog catcher and trash man on up, from holding dual citizenship, period.
Every Single Time
These demons are sick.
According to this X post the purpose of the legislation is to supposedly protect children! Yet a website like Pornhub WON'T fall under the restrictions provided by (63C) of the Social Media Minimum Age Bill!
Is it "authoritarian" for parents NOT to want their children exposed to porn? You bet it is! Parents should be "authoritarian" when it comes to protecting their children.
Get the government off the internet. Parents being the authority in their home is one thing. But said parents don’t want to patrol their children’s internet. They want the government to do it and it sounds like you support it. Are you an idiot?
Name calling are we? At what age should parents let their children on the internet? So you are the type of parent that won't "patrol" what their children access on line? So you acknowledge that parents are "the authority in their home" yet they shouldn't patrol their children's internet usage?
That's up to the parents to decide for their own families, not the nanny state's. Parents absolutely should parent.
The context of this post is from Australia. I would suspect that most of us commenting on this post are not from Australia. And the question of this Australian law was whether it would apply to a site like Pornhub? For after all it applies to YouTube. What is the purpose of the law? Reportedly it's to protect children from harm on the internet. That being the case does it make sense to apply the law to YouTube but not a site like Pornhub? Now look - it might be a bad law from the censorship standpoint but that is not what is being asked by Senator Canavan. His question is a reasonable & valid one and should be answered.
But here in the US I believe this statement applies: The Supreme Court has ruled that, “transmitting obscenity and child pornography, whether via the Internet or other means, is... illegal under federal law for both adults and juveniles.” -Reno v. ACLU, 521 U.S. 844 (1998).....keep reading more on this subject at: https://www.justice.gov/criminal/criminal-ceos/obscenity.
"Parents to decide for their own families"? Seems like the Supreme Court has already decided! As a parent & grandparent I want the law enforced.
Australia Boom! Nice addition Anon!
Thanks - but I missed something very important so I've revised my original post. I don't believe most of us commenting are from Australia - we are in the US.
It’s all good! We are International here Anon! 😉
As an Aussie we see this as digital Id.
It's to force everyone no matter the age to prove who they are and track everything we do online.
Children is the cover up for the agenda
Good point!
I was exposed to pornography as a child, left alone to the internet, in the early 2000s. While it had some pull when I was younger and curious, thank God I’m not an addict. However, I know MANY PEOPLE exposed to pornography as a child and it brought some very serious consequences. Erectile dysfunction IS A SIDE EFFECT OF PORNOGRAPHY ABUSE. But “oh no! Don’t take muh pron” 😑
I've been wondering about all the erectile dysfunction ads on TV. I couldn't believe there could be that many people with that problem, but now, it all makes sense!
Porn, plus processed foods, plus fluoride in our drinking water plus.....childhood vaccines, plus.....
and older men being waaay overmedicated for high blood pressure, heart irregularities, diabetes, etc. That stuff will shut down men fast
Yeah, it's weird in the last couple years or so.... you cant even get on FB, Youtube, etc without seeing a "bluechew" ad and it's always young 20ish people. Like, yall should not need ED pills at that age.
"I couldn't believe there could be that many people with that problem,"
At your apparent age, you probably can't. But enlarged prostates are a common cause of "that problem."
Not to mention the "grooming" aspect. The seeds of perversion get planted deep in a child's soul making them targets for some very evil people.
ED, premature greying and balding, hair thinning, brittle/rigid nails
You know, here in KS for a couple months or something now - they're fighting something about ID verification. So, here? You cant access PH. I'll admit - i have my vices and I tried. I seen something about KS is cracking down on keeping that stuff away from kids and i was like "good"
Same thing in Idaho I heard about it & looked into it just cuzz and got blocked out. I actually work in Idaho & live in Oregon go accross the border into Oregon & boom works fine.
AND that is what leads to --->DEGRADATION OF OUR SOCIETY!!!!!!!!...
Great post Rootcause!!!!
Just card people on porn sites like they do for online alcohol purchases. Sheesh. It's not that complicated. Make it illegal to post porn on non-porn sites just like it's illegal to run around naked in public or sell porn in an unregulated environment irl.
Instead what they try to do is make you have to verify your identity on social media! But that's violating our rights. The only proper way to do it would be what I described above.
(((who))) owns PornHub now?
Joooos
God's chosen people own Pornhub
Who owns Pornhub? Follow the $$!
https://www.newsweek.com/who-owns-pornhub-netflix-money-shot-documentary-1787861
A simple solution would be to have websites end in .xxx instead of .com. Then any .xxx site can be blocked with ease.
Any media sites that end with anything else would be subject to the same rules as everyone
If .xxx domain registrations were as cheap as .com, there would be more of them. It comes down to cost. It's about 10 times more just in wholesale cost.
It dosen't have to be .xxx It could just be something else that is not being used. Allow any porn site that has a .com (or whatever) to which over to the new domain using whatever name they already have as a .com. The problem of minors and porn sites could be fixed in a few days if the people running things wanted them fixed.
Does anyone get the joke that I did with the flair.... Anyone? 😂👌
Is it because PH is NOT a social media site? Maybe I don't know how PH works (not a fan), but it seems most social media are places where people go to exchange ideas, to chat, and to interact with other people. I always thought PH was just a place to peruse porn. Am I wrong about that?
Sorry, no, it's a bit more stupid of a joke
ADL has entered the chat...
There is a comment section on each video in which people can interact. I don't think it's any different than YouTube in that regard. I wouldn't want to interact in that community but I'd definitely consider it to be "social media"
Everyone defends porn because it is fun but yeah, they never want to acknowledge any downsides of it.
I meant my original deleted comment for a different thread but you’re right! Almost every video is of a woman being sex trafficked but the evil in people makes them turn a blind eye.
Most MSM news sites have comment sections too. But Idk if I'd consider it social media
Oh... well, OK then. So I'm almost loathe to ask, but do people "hook up" there on PH? Or is it that kind of chat?
God, I hope not. mostly people getting off on talking nasty and sharing the names of actors, but who tf knows what transpires in private messaging
So the answer is "yes"! It's a conduit for social interaction - private messaging.
yuk man!
Yeah, I get it.
It appears that the flair is no longer there.
I don't see it, was it removed?
Unless that is the joke...!?!? But that seems too galaxy brain.
Fixed, added it, thank you for letting me know
I got ya homie hahaha!
Because [they] want to keep poisoning humanity at the well.
Sticky...
Australia it shames me to say. Got some real retards running things down here at the moment. I do wonder how long its going to take to fix Australia.
MAGA - Make Australia Great Again!
It's been said that "you can't legislate morality". In reality that's the only thing you can legislate. Don't we have laws against murder, lying, stealing, etc? Isn't that morality? Don't those laws reflect the 10 commandants? At least in part? So the question really is whose morality will you legislate?
So make all porn sites illegal then?
Follow whatever the law of the land dictates.
Excluded because it's nothing to do with "protecting the children".
This social media b.s is the cover up for digital I.d
All Aussies will need to prove who they are no matter their age and be tracked.
Because its a website, not a social media platform. Besides, its the parents' jobs to police what their children are doing. All these bootlickers claiming to be conservative but want Uncle Sam to do their most important job for them....seems a lil inconsistent.
Nah, it's a social media platform. Not only are you allowed to upload non-explicit content, IE there are gaming lets-plays of otherwise SFW games, the platform has a very active commenting section.
If those criteria are good enough for Youtube to be blocked for underaged viewers on the basis that social media harms them, Pornhub meets the exact same criteria.
Also, not America.
There are already laws that are supposed to make it harder for minors to access pornographic content are there not? Why does it need to be regulated twice?
To be clear, I am not of the opinion that the Australian bill is something that needs passed to protect muh kids or what have you. I am merely pointing out the hypocracy of Youtube being regulated as a social media platform, but not Pornhub, despite Pornhub having very similar features as Youtube, the only difference being the focus of content.
As an aside, if Australia's Pornhub is anything like the US's, a "Yes, I am 18" button shouldn't fly. If one can't just proclaim to be of legal age for alcohol, tobacco, etc and must prove their age, why should online pornography be any different?
It's to introduce digital Id into Australia and using the excuse to "protect the children" to do it. It has nothing to do with actually protecting children, hence IT IS inconsistent.
The Oz gov is using kids as an excuse to track us all. We all need to upload evidence of who we are to access the internet
So youtube is a social media platform, and yet pornhub isn't?
i don't really feel like yt is either.
Well, let's not go down the "feel" rabbit hole, because that's what liberals use in their arguments.
By definition, any platform that you can upload your media to: video, photo, text falls under the category. Even if you have a social profile of yourself, hence the term, social media.
Restrictions are dumb. People torrent porn. People put porn on facebook of all things.
Children are not an excuse for censorship. This crap just gives libtards ammo
I simply cannot agree with your premise when increasingly large groups of deviants and pedophiles are using "early porn introduction" or EPI, as a method of grooming children online.
If we lived in a world where those people did not exist, I would be inclined to side with you, but we do need a bar set to keep the trash out.
How exactly would you do this? Pornhub would be easy to block. But there are way more sites that have no way to tell what they are by just looking at the domain name. And more pop up every day. And many of them are outside the USA.
If you ever wanted to do something good for yourself, quit drinking soda and stop watching porn. Seriously.
Nope, on that site there is plenty Catsy. 😂😂
Crickie, auzzies can still rub one out.
Totally weird.
Yeah sorry, the PornJew isn't getting taken down that easily.
Of all the websites on the internet. PornHub should be on the top of the list for age restrictions.
Porn Hib got busted with underage content on its sites. "Pornhub removes a majority of its videos after investigation reveals child abuse." https://archive.ph/GB55K
Probably less CSAM than Facebook and Youtube.
Cuz da Joos
I have a reason why Pornhub isn't covered.
But it'll probably get me banned on GAW.
Wth is 63C and why don't they link it?
Will it require Communities.Win to validate users identities when signing up for an account?
You people really ought not to support such bills under the guise of wont somebody think of the children. Those are some of the worse bills to be passed.
What's wrong with people that they need stuff like that in the first place? They have to have the IQ of a doorknob. I vividly recall my first year of college when "Deep Throat" was being talked about among the guys on campus as if it was the greatest thing since hot spit. I had just turned 18 -- and fresh out of an all girl Catholic high school. I knew part A fit into part B but had no idea movement was involved. I subsequently discovered I wasn't the only one who didn't know that but I digress.
After I married my husband, we were discussing mutual college acquaintances and I mentioned to him how they always went on and on about "Deep Throat" and that I wondered what the fascination was about that movie. Back in those days, there were video rental stores so he rented the film for me (at my request) because I wanted to see what.the commotion was all about.
It was stupid! It was so stupid that I remember laughing and asking my husbamd how anyone could take the plot of that film seriously.
For those who haven't seen this idiocy, if I remember correctly (it's been decades) -- it's about a dentist who discovers his patient has a body part normally found elsewhere in the anatomy and hijinks ensue. It was so utterly brainless how anyone could find that sexually stimulating was beyond my comprehension. We (my husband and I) laughed and didn't bother finishing it.
It did, however, change our perception of our college acquaintances. We no longer viewed them as people of intelligence but rather as complete idiots.
That's the only "porn" I've ever seen. It's not at all "sexy" -- it's stupid.
piss offf with your authoritarian bullshit. Keep that up and Trump will lose 2028 and cabal will regain power.
Sincerely, -A libertarian that's lent you and Trump support since 2015 and that will retract that support as soon as you all go the wrong direction.
Whoops. This user has been sent outside for 3 days to touch grass. Let's hope it helps.
so kids should have unlimited access to porn, but not unlimited access on non porn sites? just wondering, don't shoot me...
Here’s the real problem: giving the government any authority to block any access to the internet. This whole program needs to be shut down.
Autists like myself had full access to everything in the 90s
No parental controls parents did not even know tech
And we were better for it. most of us were more worried about getting an online gf/bf than porn
Parental controls and safe websites made new generations stupid. Retard Gen Z tumblr fairies grew up on ABC mouse and a sterile internet..all it did was make them stupid
We saw goatse, that was enough to scare us off porn and get us learning HTML instead
How does what you just said make any sense in the context presented?