Win / GreatAwakening
GreatAwakening
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
GreatAwakening Where We Go Qne, We Go All!
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

520
New judge assigned to Maricopa audit (www.thegatewaypundit.com)
posted 5 years ago by Precocious13 5 years ago by Precocious13 +520 / -0
121 comments share
121 comments share save hide report block hide replies
Comments (121)
sorted by:
▲ 159 ▼
– Retaining_H2O 159 points 5 years ago +159 / -0

The new judge is giving both sides 10-days to make their cases to determine what needs to happen next.

My suggestion: Rinse & Repeat. Create another conflict of interest for THIS judge in about 9 or 10 days... so he has to recuse himself. Then another judge will be selected... giving you an additional 10 days for the audit. :>)

By the time they've finally settled on a judge... the audit will be over and the results will be known nation wide.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 79 ▼
– FreedomFan1975 79 points 5 years ago +79 / -0

Damn good strategy - I hope they have the same idea. If they can prove he worked with Perkins Coie then that should be a no-brainer. But then so should the election have been a no-brainer, so no guarantees there.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 23 ▼
– halcyondream 23 points 5 years ago +23 / -0

Conflict of interest isn't a problem when it's favorable to their side.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– MurmaidMan 5 points 5 years ago +5 / -0

Agreed, they do not recuse when their is a conflict of interest.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 29 ▼
– OkieBowhunter 29 points 5 years ago +29 / -0

So the initial conflict came from the auditor side and not the corrupt AF Democrat election rigger side?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 12 ▼
– Qbeliever 12 points 5 years ago +12 / -0

Yes

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 9 ▼
– Infidel440 9 points 5 years ago +9 / -0

I don’t think that’s right. The initial conflict came from a new attorney on the Dems side that previously worked under that judge or something like that.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 21 ▼
– deleted 21 points 5 years ago +21 / -0
▲ 9 ▼
– deleted 9 points 5 years ago +9 / -0
▲ 2 ▼
– Red_Pill_Pusher_Man 2 points 5 years ago +2 / -0

I like your straight and to the point hopium distribution method.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 5 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 2 ▼
– FractalizingIron 2 points 5 years ago +2 / -0

Hmmm. According to ET, judge recuses himself because an attorney for one of the auditing groups has worked with him before, as an intern:

Viskovic now holds a position as a junior associate at Kolodin Law Group PLLC, which is representing the Florida-based cybersecurity firm Cyber Ninjas in court. Cyber Ninjas is one of four firms hired by the state Senate to conduct the audit.

sauce https://www.theepochtimes.com/mkt_breakingnews/maricopa-county-judge-recuses-himself-from-2020-election-audit-case_3790927.html

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 8 ▼
– Tookens 8 points 5 years ago +8 / -0

Yeah. And that was dumb. Really dumb.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 15 ▼
– Slyver 15 points 5 years ago +15 / -0

Never assume you know more about what is really going on than those in control of this operation.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– deleted 3 points 5 years ago +3 / -0
▲ 3 ▼
– Slyver 3 points 5 years ago +3 / -0

There is no such thing as guilty by association. Trump has all kinds of associations I could list that are very damning. Yet I'm fairly certain he is on our side.

If you have other evidence than him being part of a group decades ago, please present it.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 5 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 4 ▼
– Slyver 4 points 5 years ago +4 / -0

Do you have evidence of this judge being bad OTHER than his association from a couple decades ago with Perkins Coie?

More specifically:

In 1992 Judge Martin joined Brown & Bain (now Perkins Coie) as an associate. He left Brown & Bain in 1996 to join the firm of Bonn, Luscher, Padden & Wilkins

So 30ish years ago he was part of a group that is bad. He was with them for 4 years and moved on. Is that your only evidence?

permalink parent save report block reply
... continue reading thread?
▲ 14 ▼
– LBTrumplican2 14 points 5 years ago +14 / -0

https://qalerts.app/?n=1278

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– What-Me-Worry 7 points 5 years ago +7 / -0

WOW!

I gotta smarten up and check the delta's every morning.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 5 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 2 ▼
– What-Me-Worry 2 points 5 years ago +2 / -0

If you look at the date of Q post # 1278 it was posted exactly three years ago on Sunday.

The New Judge announcement may be indicating that the swamp is buying time in the AZ ballot audit. All the " <===== " below I added to highlight.

1278 Apr 26, 2018 9:48:19 PM EDT

Re_read. Precursor. They are buying time. <===== National crisis. <===== Some [top eyes on 1st] are calling for immediate arrests. <===== Cooperating. <===== Still have access. Controlled. Kept at top. Chair+ NAT SEC issue. POTUS. Reveal gmail draft comms. Who had access? Legal case(s) building. <===== You have a voice. <===== Be heard. <===== Patience isn’t always easy. But vital to get right.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 5 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– Alkaizer 1 point 5 years ago +1 / -0

?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– ProphetOfKek 6 points 5 years ago +6 / -0

Do we have enough patriot judges for that plan?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– jfunction 1 point 5 years ago +1 / -0

Probably what will happen.

permalink parent save report block reply
View 10 more comments
▲ 64 ▼
– Precocious13 [S] 64 points 5 years ago +64 / -0

Daniel G. Martin, preliminary sauce says ties to Perkins Coie. Edit taken from comments:

"From 1992 to 1996 Judge Martin worked for Brown & Bain which is now Perkins Coie who worked on behalf of the Clinton campaign and was the firm that paid for the fake Fusion GPS Russian dossier!"

permalink save report block reply
▲ 29 ▼
– deleted 29 points 5 years ago +29 / -0
▲ 12 ▼
– EarnYourVote 12 points 5 years ago +12 / -0

He should have to recuse having worked for the primary litigant for the Dems

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– deleted 7 points 5 years ago +7 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– SirCamembert 1 point 5 years ago +1 / -0

Appreciate your digs brother

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– TakeItBack 2 points 5 years ago +2 / -0

Bain.......any connection to Mittens? Or was that Bains.....

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 14 ▼
– deleted 14 points 5 years ago +14 / -0
▲ 13 ▼
– GreatFunana 13 points 5 years ago +13 / -0

Lets see what happens in 10 days. Code-money said something like this would probably happen though.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Red-in-CA 2 points 5 years ago +2 / -0

My read is he is giving them 10 days to restart any motions they had with the previous judge.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– deleted 2 points 5 years ago +2 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– GreatFunana 1 point 5 years ago +1 / -0

Sauce?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 5 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 8 ▼
– deleted 8 points 5 years ago +8 / -0
▲ 6 ▼
– GodWins_76 6 points 5 years ago +6 / -0

Dude has a pedo-stache

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– DesertBrat 3 points 5 years ago +3 / -0

Lol. I thought the same thing. As soon as I saw that thing...creep factor rolled in. ?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– deleted 4 points 5 years ago +4 / -0
▲ 49 ▼
– JDVETERAN 49 points 5 years ago +49 / -0

10 days to file a motion.... I have a theory that the audit might actually be a long way toward being completed by then. I know they said it would take 40 days..... but I think that there is a good possibility they put out this timeline purposely as disinformation. I remember Jovan Pulitzer back in Georgia saying he could forensically audit tons of ballots relatively quickly. Or maybe they will have enough evidence of fraud within the next 10 days that it won't matter if the judge rules to stop the audit or not.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 36 ▼
– Monomial 36 points 5 years ago +36 / -0

Or maybe having a corrupt judge try and step in and stop the audits is exactly what is necessary in order to create a constitutional crisis so the military can step in.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 17 ▼
– shortyg 17 points 5 years ago +17 / -0

Basically military will say fuck it and do the audit themselves? Sounds spicy.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 19 ▼
– deleted 19 points 5 years ago +19 / -0
▲ 10 ▼
– VetforTrump 10 points 5 years ago +10 / -0

Why wouldn't that have been created when the Supreme. Court caved?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 17 ▼
– Monomial 17 points 5 years ago +17 / -0

A couple of thoughts. 1) Because it simply wasn't time yet. The optics needed to be right. 2) Because at that point there was no actual legislative action that the court was blocking. It was simply a legal case that SCOTUS refused to accept.

This is different as any attempt to shut down the audit could be construed as directly usurping legislative authority and separation of powers.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 8 ▼
– deleted 8 points 5 years ago +8 / -0
▲ 4 ▼
– CokeOrPepe 4 points 5 years ago +4 / -0

FREEDOM BONER INTENSIFIES

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– deleted 3 points 5 years ago +3 / -0
▲ 2 ▼
– DaesDaemar 2 points 5 years ago +2 / -0

Downvoted for not realizing that people downvoted here, often. Then double-upvoted because why not.

edit: it could have been because crude / immature, or just a hater

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 5 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 5 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 9 ▼
– deleted 9 points 5 years ago +9 / -0
▲ 5 ▼
– Lupinate 5 points 5 years ago +5 / -0

Two weeks and we are 4 days in i ?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Qlueless 1 point 5 years ago +1 / -0

We should be able to measure progress by counting the pallets of ballots moved in a day.

So far I think I only see a couple of boxes in the nearly empty corral on camera 9.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 18 ▼
– deleted 18 points 5 years ago +18 / -0
▲ 10 ▼
– OkieBowhunter 10 points 5 years ago +10 / -0

Especially if the watermark appears like random defects in the paper but it's actually a watermark.

Holy shit this will be huge.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 14 ▼
– deleted 14 points 5 years ago +14 / -0
▲ 3 ▼
– negative_entropy 3 points 5 years ago +3 / -0

Can't you just add some randomness to make the geometric shapes not perfect?

Looking for unique fingerprints is interesting.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– deleted 5 points 5 years ago +5 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– negative_entropy 1 point 5 years ago +1 / -0

that makes sense. I've seen the spray up close from a inkjet but not a laser from a high res scanner. I thought the dots were much more fine with a laser.

permalink parent save report block reply
View 1 more comment
▲ 8 ▼
– blacksmith21 8 points 5 years ago +8 / -0

https://superiorcourt.maricopa.gov/civil/judicial-officer-hon-daniel-martin/

permalink save report block reply
▲ 10 ▼
– horseyPatriot 10 points 5 years ago +10 / -0

Ruh roh. Used to work for Perkins Coie firm (before it became Perkins Coie.) Remember AZ is McStain country. Anyone living there long term could be compromised!

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– blacksmith21 1 point 5 years ago +1 / -0

Very possibly???

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– skf93 5 points 5 years ago +5 / -0

Is this new judge trustworthy?

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– deleted 2 points 5 years ago +2 / -0
▲ 2 ▼
– deleted 2 points 5 years ago +2 / -0
▲ 5 ▼
– Helpus2021 5 points 5 years ago +5 / -0

What do we know about this judge?

permalink save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– deleted 4 points 5 years ago +4 / -0
▲ 2 ▼
– Helpus2021 2 points 5 years ago +2 / -0

Thxnks. I guess the question is white hat or black hat?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– deleted 4 points 5 years ago +4 / -0
▲ 3 ▼
– deleted 3 points 5 years ago +3 / -0
▲ 2 ▼
– Phishhed44 2 points 5 years ago +2 / -0

Or have they been...mistreated(?).

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– deleted 3 points 5 years ago +3 / -0
▲ 2 ▼
– deleted 2 points 5 years ago +2 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 5 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– Helpus2021 1 point 5 years ago +1 / -0

Thanking!

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– LordKekingtonEsquire 5 points 5 years ago +5 / -0

It sure would be a shame if someone were to recreate the Perkins Coie Offices in Minecraft and then accidentally leave their torch on the ground when exploring the interior for accuracy...

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– deleted 3 points 5 years ago +3 / -0
▲ 3 ▼
– HTTP_404 3 points 5 years ago +3 / -0

Works/ed with firm that became perkins coie? Slight conflict of interest anyone?

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– horseyPatriot 3 points 5 years ago +3 / -0

Many of us are aware of corruption via Flynn/Sullivan. But this is a REALLY good interview with a FL lawyer who has encountered judicial corruption in FL. You look at judge switches in a whole different light after watching it!

https://www.redvoicemedia.com/2021/04/constitutional-crisis-indisputable-evidence-of-widespread-deep-judicial-corruption-special-report-from-stew-peters/

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– saltlegger 3 points 5 years ago +3 / -0

So we know that no judge wants to take the case because for one it's outside of their jurisdiction and for two none of them want to die. I think we can easily take advantage of this.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– swimkin 2 points 5 years ago +2 / -0

Who cares? As long as the audit continues I’m happy

permalink save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– antigrima 4 points 5 years ago +4 / -0

That's why we care

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– DubzTail 2 points 5 years ago +2 / -0

Fudge monkey but we will prevail!!!

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 5 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 2 ▼
– deleted 2 points 5 years ago +2 / -0
▲ 2 ▼
– Out0fAmmo 2 points 5 years ago +2 / -0

Docket code 066? As in... Order 66?

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Ez6i-44UYAA6zuW?format=png&name=900x900

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– antigrima 2 points 5 years ago +2 / -0

Why did he previous judge recuse himself?

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– Feelsgoodman 3 points 5 years ago +3 / -0

He knew a lawyer who just joined the team of lawyers on the case...which is why they had him join the team

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– antigrima 1 point 5 years ago +1 / -0

Which team did the new lawyer join?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 5 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– Nowsthetime 1 point 5 years ago +1 / -0

The first one, Coury? Because our side got someone to work for them who had interned with the judge five years ago.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Dontdoxxxmeplease 1 point 5 years ago +1 / -0

Feels Batman about judge recusal

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– FROGSQUATCH 1 point 5 years ago +1 / -0

I'd love to know the blackmail details the DS has on these judges.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 5 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 5 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– CincyJoe 1 point 5 years ago +1 / -0

So wtf is this judge even ruling on?? I thought everything had already been litigated and the final ruling was to proceed with the audit!

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– ThePowerOfPrayer 2 points 5 years ago +2 / -0

Democrat challenges to the audit presumably.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– CincyJoe 1 point 5 years ago +1 / -0

Good call. Thanks...

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– JakeCAnon 1 point 5 years ago +1 / -0

Man he looks like a controlled pedo.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Fringe--dweller PRO 1 point 5 years ago +1 / -0

Maybe I need to get out more, but the guy in the GWP picture looks like a different guy in the linked profile, but the hairline and style is identical in both, even tho the beard is very different. Why would photo- fit judges be a thing ?

permalink save report block reply

Welcome


The Great Awakening


We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.


WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q


Welcome to the Digital Battlefield — Together We Win

Rules


Q Supporters

This is The Great Awakening. Our community is international, focused on helping ourselves and others walk away from the programming, and return our governments to "by the people, for the people!"



Follow the Law

No posts or comments that violate laws in your jurisdiction or the United States. The Feds are always watching!



No Bad Behavior!

No doxing, including revealing personal information of non-public figures, as well as addresses, phone numbers, etc. of public figures. All GAW users must adhere to the highest standards of conduct, whichever .WIN they are on. If we are notified by other moderators of incivil behavior on other .WINs, you WILL be banned here!



Civil Discussion ONLY**

They want you divided.

They want you labeled by race, religion, class, sex, etc.

Divided you are weak [no collective power].

Divided you attack each other and miss the true target [them].



No PAYtriots/No Self Promotion

Linking or promoting merchandise, fundraising, or spamming personal websites, blogs, or channels is not permitted. Do not attempt to profit from Q or advertise for those who do. Peace is the prize. We do it for free.



Questions and Concerns

All moderation questions and concerns should be submitted via modmail. DO NOT GRIEF the mods.



Expand your thinking

Remember, this .WIN is the public face of the Great Awakening, and, as a member here, you agree to represent the Great Awakening movement against Globalism, Communism and Progressive Insanity in the best, most positive way possible. NOTE: Your comments and posts may become news. Keep it classy!

This is not a 'fringe conspiracy' site: Visit https://conspiracies.win if that's your thing!



No doomers or shills

If you can't use common sense, you'll get banned without hesitation. If you're a shill, you fall under this rule. If you're a doomer, you fall under this rule as you just add garbage to the site like the other two. This includes forum sliding.



General Rules

  • Mods will issue NO warnings, followed by temporary bans and/or permanent bans. DO NOT GRIEF THE MODS.

  • Keep posts related to topics Q has raised or that are current.

  • Keep post duplication (especially from other .WINs) to a minimum.

  • HIGH EFFORT, HIGH-INFO posts only! Please respect other readers' time. Please use descriptive titles. No URLs in titles, pls. No clickbait.

  • No fame-fagging; no, "your" post did not get removed! Were you the original author?? Eyes on the prize, people!

  • Memes encouraged, but no low-quality, low-info posts.

  • Keep it honest and accurate.

  • GAW Supporters ONLY. (Sorry, the train had no brakes.)

  • Handshake noobs will be scrutinized by their Q knowledge, sincerity, and respect.

  • Remember, your conduct here represents the Q movement! OUR ENEMIES ARE WATCHING!

  • Please direct all complaints to modmail first!


Resources


WELCOME TO THE DIGITAL BATTLEFIELD


"River of Search" script:


GAW post formatting tips


Q Research (Q only posts at 8kun)


Q post archives (qagg.news) others 1 2 3 4


Browse Drops from the beginning


QProofs.com


Learn to read the Q map


Book of Q Proofs v1.3 (pdf)


Law of War & Majic Eyes Qnly Resources


Trumps twitter archive


POTUS: The Calm Before The Storm


Pedosta and DNC dumps


GIFs & QPosts


Poll Post Format


SPY ON US! See: mod Logs


The Greatest Show on Earth!


New to Q? "The Earth Chronicles Ep 12: Q & The White-Hat Op: What's Real, What's Not?"


Moderators

  • dropgun
  • catsfive
  • AutoMod
  • Filter
  • Fatality
  • Qanaut
  • bubble_bursts
  • Brent75
  • and 5 more...
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026.02.01 - whmbz (status)

Copyright © 2026.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy