Full of bacony cheesy goodness burger. Dec 18 report showed how infiltrated the intel agencies like dhs and cisa are and how they work with msm to obstruct communication of truth. They are a law unto themselves, prepared to ignore executive orders. The report also gave the patriots the opportunity to put on record that CISA and DHS were supporting foreign interference in the election.
It isn't about us. It isn't about you or me really. I have been awake for a long time. Seems to me this is about waking up as many as possible. That means I have to wait the longest. That sux and it is tiring. But as long as I see things moving in the right direction I am good waiting.
Perfectly stated, stunning in its simplicity and completeness.
Waiting only exists to the extent we focus on it. If we ignore it and fill the time with other things we want or need to do, we're no longer waiting. The wait is over!
Then the realization that the wait is always over, if we choose. The wait has always been over. Hence NCSWIC. If nothing can stop it, why bother waiting for it?
I think that 4-6% are the "ruling" government "leaders". They're deep in their delusions of world domination, they have have fooled many many under them.
Maybe, but not because of those EOs. Those EOs are entirely related to 1) making a report of election issues caused by foreign parties and including recommendations as appropriate, and 2) imposing financial sanctions on any persons who caused those problems.
It is also important to note the dates of the EOs. Colonel Waldron said they were from 2015, which means they were written by Hussein. Maybe EOs that were intended to be used by Hildebeast against conservatives, but are now backfiring on them since the witch lost?
Wrong, EO 13848 and 13849 are sequential, from September 12 and 20, 2018. Whatever Waldron said about Obama would relate to something done or drafted earlier. These are the same EO's that we've been saying since December were known to have been triggered because the DNI made his public response. The apparent weakness of the public response does not mean its private attachments were legally insufficient to proceed with devolution.
You are right that Trump signed both in 2018. I believe each of Trumps EOs make references to previous EOs that may have been signed by previous presidents. They may be daisy chained a bit.
Regardless, if there was foreign interference by China or other foreign countries, and they colluded with Big Tech, the MSM, Dems, Rinos, CEOs and Fortune 500 companies, I want ALL of them held accountable and treated as the traitors they all are.
Yeah... I just saw something about Nick Fuentes (don't know who he is, but it was posted here) having 500K seized. Would that be part of it? I'm assuming a lot of celebrity home sales are part of that, but haven't been tracking...
I have a feeling someone is going to screen record that segment so look for it on the board. The key take away is that Waldron said that both EO 13848 and EO 13849 were triggered due to the FBI and DHS alerts warning of foreign election interference.
In a nutshell, if China was involved, we can say bye bye CCP!
Me too because Col. Waldron doesn’t speak off the cuff. I noticed throughout this symposium his responses/statements were always measured and carefully chosen.
You may want to try Firefox if you are using Brave. I've noticed that with some video content, I try to rewind or go back a bit while in Brave, it won't let me. Tried the same thing in Firefox and it worked.
It depends how you want to interpret it. First sentence in Key Judgment 4: We assess that China did not deploy interference efforts... Last sentence: ... China did take some steps to try and undermine former President Trump's reelection.
Because the Intelligence Community wanted Trump to lose they don't see anything that China did as interference. But they also know that when the TRUTH comes out they need something in there to say, yah, we told you they were conducting a Cyber Attack.
When they say "did take some steps" what they are really saying is China coordinated with Dominion to steal the election for Joe.
The DNI Memo is cited to on page 5 of the report. "Please see" January 7 2021 DNI Memorandum. AS IF it was a supporting document. The more appropriate citation would have been "But see, contra, DNI Memorandum." Indeed Ratcliffe's view of the situation was a wee bit different. As Patel Patriot noted, I bet he discussed those views when he and Trump took Air Force One to the Army/Navy game on December 12. Would explain the flurry of election fraud Tweets POTUS sent out the next day.
I think the initial report was in conflict with DIA and Space Force reports, which will further implicate the three letter agencies. Another set up by Trump.
Thanks for sharing. Had this come out while Ratcliffe was still in charge of DNI, I think it would have more value. Clearly this was written by the same people that hounded Trump for 5 years.
For a fantastic laugh please review Key Judgment 4 (They slip in the truth with the very last sentence):
We assess that China did not deploy interference efforts and considered but did not deploy influence efforts intended to change the outcome of the US Presidential Election. We have high confidence in this judgment. China sought stability in its relationship with the United States, did not view either election outcome as being advantageous enough for China to risk getting caught meddling, and assessed its traditional influence tools - primarily targeted economic measures and lobbying - would be sufficient to meet its goal of shaping US China policy regardless of the winner. The NIO for Cyber assesses, however, that China did take some steps to try to undermine former President Trump's reelection.
Do you know what the "NIO for Cyber" is? I did some searching and couldn't find much. I did come across this article which perfectly sums up what I was thinking when I read the DNI report.
See my note above. On page 5 they cite Ratcliffe's January 7 memo almost like it's a supporting document. "Please see" DNI Memorandum. Very misleading, should have said "but see DNI Memorandum." Lying liars who lie.
The flag is located approximately 9 miles to the southwest of the small municipal airfield just south of Gastonia, N.C. where President Trump held a rally on 21 October 2020.
The flag is just a couple of miles north of the location of The Battle of Kings Mountain.
The Battle of Kings Mountain was a military engagement between Patriot and Loyalist militias in South Carolina during the Southern Campaign of the American Revolutionary War, resulting in a decisive victory for the Patriots. The battle took place on October 7, 1780, 9 miles (14 km) south of the present-day town of Kings Mountain, North Carolina. In what is now rural Cherokee County, South Carolina, the Patriot militia defeated the Loyalist militia commanded by British Major Patrick Ferguson of the 71st Foot. The battle has been described as "the war's largest all-American fight"
I have the updated manual in hardback... blue cover. I use it more often than the online. When I retrieved the PDF last evening and that crimson red background hit my eyes I did a double take, thought I must have pulled something else up by mistake. After confirming I had the right file is when it hit me that there might be a correlation to the Rig For Red Q messaging.
When the EO numbers were mentioned, they flew past me before I could write them down. I knew this was something important and would tie back to stuff we already knew. I'm glad someone was faster than me. Thanks, fren!
Talking about this video? This is an excerpt from the symposium, with focus on the cyber attacks and social engineering (hopefully I understood the social engineering part correctly as I used Google's live transcription service to watch the video).
I'm tapped out, channeling is exhausting. Didn't see it, I'm done for awhile.
But I believe you. It's coming. Devolution is real. We are at war. We're going to win.
We have already won. We just cleaning up the leftovers!
Nobody will believe this until they see it in their sphere of reality.
Because the reality we’re all living in is the reality where nobody has been held accountable for shit. All I’m hearing is barking and no bite.
I heard him say it, but then he followed with the report in December that was issued by CISA or DHS or whomever that was a nothingburger.
Full of bacony cheesy goodness burger. Dec 18 report showed how infiltrated the intel agencies like dhs and cisa are and how they work with msm to obstruct communication of truth. They are a law unto themselves, prepared to ignore executive orders. The report also gave the patriots the opportunity to put on record that CISA and DHS were supporting foreign interference in the election.
We collectively may have won, but many good people have been lost the further this clownshow goes on.
It isn't about us. It isn't about you or me really. I have been awake for a long time. Seems to me this is about waking up as many as possible. That means I have to wait the longest. That sux and it is tiring. But as long as I see things moving in the right direction I am good waiting.
Perfectly stated, stunning in its simplicity and completeness.
Waiting only exists to the extent we focus on it. If we ignore it and fill the time with other things we want or need to do, we're no longer waiting. The wait is over!
Then the realization that the wait is always over, if we choose. The wait has always been over. Hence NCSWIC. If nothing can stop it, why bother waiting for it?
Could this be the end of datefagging? :) jk
Every day is a gift, if you sit around 'waiting' you're wasting this precious gift of time.
Yesterday is history, tomorrow is a mystery, and today is a gift, that’s why they call it the present
Still waiting on that "footage" you claim exists...
"Waiting is"...
Amen
Believe it when I see traitors swinging and Trump is back in the WH.
I think so too
If this is the top comment,......You really have got tired of winning...16 year plan ring a bell?
But I thought qtards were complacent layperson?/s
I swear it's usually the complacent ones saying that.
Amen, BoatingAccident!
Same. And I point people to here and have helped bring redditors from NoNewNormal to the .win version and then they will find their way around.
I think that 4-6% are the "ruling" government "leaders". They're deep in their delusions of world domination, they have have fooled many many under them.
I heard him say the FBI and DHS found enough evidence to activate an EO.
The FBI found that there were Chinese agents in the US who had turned their shoelaces into what looked like nooses!!!
Lol! I was just repeating what I heard. Just saying.
Lmfao!
A lot of those Chinese spies look like us.
Ahhhh-soooo
That is what I heard too
So, “The Military is in Control.” ?
Maybe, but not because of those EOs. Those EOs are entirely related to 1) making a report of election issues caused by foreign parties and including recommendations as appropriate, and 2) imposing financial sanctions on any persons who caused those problems.
It is also important to note the dates of the EOs. Colonel Waldron said they were from 2015, which means they were written by Hussein. Maybe EOs that were intended to be used by Hildebeast against conservatives, but are now backfiring on them since the witch lost?
Incorrect, these were signed by Trump
One by Hussein and one by Trump
Wrong, EO 13848 and 13849 are sequential, from September 12 and 20, 2018. Whatever Waldron said about Obama would relate to something done or drafted earlier. These are the same EO's that we've been saying since December were known to have been triggered because the DNI made his public response. The apparent weakness of the public response does not mean its private attachments were legally insufficient to proceed with devolution.
You are right that Trump signed both in 2018. I believe each of Trumps EOs make references to previous EOs that may have been signed by previous presidents. They may be daisy chained a bit.
Regardless, if there was foreign interference by China or other foreign countries, and they colluded with Big Tech, the MSM, Dems, Rinos, CEOs and Fortune 500 companies, I want ALL of them held accountable and treated as the traitors they all are.
Trump added to existing EOs thereby eliminating the scrutiny new ones would cause. So Trump flew under the radar so to speak. Brilliant.
How? Both were issued in Sept on 2018. Both by 45
The EOs in question refer in the text to other, earlier EOs that may have been signed by Sotero.
I believe they were drafted by obama and then edited and signed by trump. I know there were a few EOs like that
Oh the irony lol
If Hillary won do you think they wouldve dropped the russian collusion case? No. Thats what they were for and trump used it against them. Genius.
They intended to seize every from Trump, his family and everyone he knew or that voted for him.
The financial sanctions are ambiguous... seizing assets as a whole I would assume.
Yeah... I just saw something about Nick Fuentes (don't know who he is, but it was posted here) having 500K seized. Would that be part of it? I'm assuming a lot of celebrity home sales are part of that, but haven't been tracking...
Plus the Rothchikds selling their land (hunting camp 🤮). Tons of holleyweirdo's selling their homes....,
Buckingham palace being emptied, under the guise of "renovations"
Was wondering same 😎
Does this fit in? https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2017/12/26/2017-27925/blocking-the-property-of-persons-involved-in-serious-human-rights-abuse-or-corruption
Yes. All the farmland owned by Bill Gates, the Vatican archives & treasures... :)
Interesting that the "pope" cut the salaries of cardinals and was begging for donations... 🤔
And auctioning the leftovers I imagine.
Thanks for posting, I didn't catch the EO numbers.
Pull up the live feed and rewind a few minutes.
https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2018/09/14/2018-20203/imposing-certain-sanctions-in-the-event-of-foreign-interference-in-a-united-states-election
https://www.state.gov/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/Executive-Order-13849-.pdf
I have a feeling someone is going to screen record that segment so look for it on the board. The key take away is that Waldron said that both EO 13848 and EO 13849 were triggered due to the FBI and DHS alerts warning of foreign election interference.
In a nutshell, if China was involved, we can say bye bye CCP!
u/#Byebye u/#Trumptank
Yes! I heard it! I saw it!
I heard it too caught me by surprise.
Me too because Col. Waldron doesn’t speak off the cuff. I noticed throughout this symposium his responses/statements were always measured and carefully chosen.
Can't say goodbye to the CCP soon enough for my liking.
This......
You may want to try Firefox if you are using Brave. I've noticed that with some video content, I try to rewind or go back a bit while in Brave, it won't let me. Tried the same thing in Firefox and it worked.
13849 https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2018/09/21/2018-20816/authorizing-the-implementation-of-certain-sanctions-set-forth-in-the-countering-americas-adversaries
Dam just posted same above before reading this.
Here's the subsequent report:
https://www.dni.gov/files/ODNI/documents/assessments/ICA-declass-16MAR21.pdf
spoiler alert... it's disappointing and clearly shows favor to China.
Ahh so this is a nothing burger?
It depends how you want to interpret it. First sentence in Key Judgment 4: We assess that China did not deploy interference efforts... Last sentence: ... China did take some steps to try and undermine former President Trump's reelection.
Because the Intelligence Community wanted Trump to lose they don't see anything that China did as interference. But they also know that when the TRUTH comes out they need something in there to say, yah, we told you they were conducting a Cyber Attack.
When they say "did take some steps" what they are really saying is China coordinated with Dominion to steal the election for Joe.
I believe the DNI issued a follow up that basically said the IC report was full of crap and didn’t meet industry standard.
The DNI Memo is cited to on page 5 of the report. "Please see" January 7 2021 DNI Memorandum. AS IF it was a supporting document. The more appropriate citation would have been "But see, contra, DNI Memorandum." Indeed Ratcliffe's view of the situation was a wee bit different. As Patel Patriot noted, I bet he discussed those views when he and Trump took Air Force One to the Army/Navy game on December 12. Would explain the flurry of election fraud Tweets POTUS sent out the next day.
I think the initial report was in conflict with DIA and Space Force reports, which will further implicate the three letter agencies. Another set up by Trump.
Appears so… Unless you need further confirmation that US intel agencies are compromised because that report is an obvious obfuscation
yep...
Outstanding link @ThetruthSpreadsinNY!
I am placing the cat here to alert readers to read DNI Ratcliffe's report you are linking to.
u/#catdance
Thanks for sharing. Had this come out while Ratcliffe was still in charge of DNI, I think it would have more value. Clearly this was written by the same people that hounded Trump for 5 years.
For a fantastic laugh please review Key Judgment 4 (They slip in the truth with the very last sentence):
That’s how I saw it. The EOs had teeth, but the report that was produced isn’t worth shit.
Do you know what the "NIO for Cyber" is? I did some searching and couldn't find much. I did come across this article which perfectly sums up what I was thinking when I read the DNI report.
https://dailytorch.com/2021/03/intelligence-agencies-simply-will-not-stop-interfering-in-u-s-presidential-politics/
National Intelligence Officer
Thanks 45-4KAG!
See my note above. On page 5 they cite Ratcliffe's January 7 memo almost like it's a supporting document. "Please see" DNI Memorandum. Very misleading, should have said "but see DNI Memorandum." Lying liars who lie.
Oooohhhh!!! Nice!!!
So is that how they got the packet things? from the skiff room!
SCIF - sensitive compartmented information facility
They didn't get PACS
u/#q4949
Still photo taken from this you tube clip:
https://youtu.be/v9UFwOwIBcQ
Here is the "final scene" from "3 Days of the Cyber Symposium":
https://youtu.be/m9Ghu8r7A3U?t=20602 (watch the flag on big screen)
Watch this clip at 0.25 speed / compare blue of sky in background
https://youtu.be/N6wJfKtiiGg?t=569
The flag is located approximately 9 miles to the southwest of the small municipal airfield just south of Gastonia, N.C. where President Trump held a rally on 21 October 2020.
The flag is just a couple of miles north of the location of The Battle of Kings Mountain.
The Battle of Kings Mountain was a military engagement between Patriot and Loyalist militias in South Carolina during the Southern Campaign of the American Revolutionary War, resulting in a decisive victory for the Patriots. The battle took place on October 7, 1780, 9 miles (14 km) south of the present-day town of Kings Mountain, North Carolina. In what is now rural Cherokee County, South Carolina, the Patriot militia defeated the Loyalist militia commanded by British Major Patrick Ferguson of the 71st Foot. The battle has been described as "the war's largest all-American fight"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Kings_Mountain
MANUAL FOR COURTS MARTIAL
.................UNITED STATES
............................. 2016
The cover of this manual use to be BLUE.
It is now RED
https://jsc.defense.gov/Portals/99/Documents/MCM2016.pdf?ver=2016-12-08-181411-957
Anticipating the question, I cannot recall exactly the last time when I accessed the manual on line... more than a month less than three.
Regardless, we know what it signifies:
u/#q4736
Act III
https://youtu.be/9tjdswqGGVg (embed link from #4949 above / Promontory / 6 min)
From the film Last of the Mohicans / Promontory
https://youtu.be/q8ZisDHg6v0 (7 min, 34 sec)
I have the updated manual in hardback... blue cover. I use it more often than the online. When I retrieved the PDF last evening and that crimson red background hit my eyes I did a double take, thought I must have pulled something else up by mistake. After confirming I had the right file is when it hit me that there might be a correlation to the Rig For Red Q messaging.
When the EO numbers were mentioned, they flew past me before I could write them down. I knew this was something important and would tie back to stuff we already knew. I'm glad someone was faster than me. Thanks, fren!
Sure thing LoneWulf!
13848 https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2018/09/14/2018-20203/imposing-certain-sanctions-in-the-event-of-foreign-interference-in-a-united-states-election
If I recall that was due to those fake Proud Boys threats
I heard that!!! My heart perked up.
Talking about this video? This is an excerpt from the symposium, with focus on the cyber attacks and social engineering (hopefully I understood the social engineering part correctly as I used Google's live transcription service to watch the video).
https://cdn.frankspeech.com/mikelindellandsynposiumattackedmp4144686/mp4/mikelindellandsynposiumattackedmp4144686.mp4
Yeah, we're gonna need a fair bit more than just one retired Colonel's words.
Retired from the 305th. That's enough for me.