Dan Scavino. Marker 9 comms!
(media.greatawakening.win)
Comments (115)
sorted by:
Just seen a NYPost article that Hunter Biden had his bank records subpoenaed by a grand jury today for his dealings with China.
First arrested being Hunter would be pretty shocking.
would raise questions like, why doesn't daddy president just pardon him?
Can you pardon international crimes?
It appears the democrats can do whatever they want. . ... Key word...appears
Yeah, like just "not enforce the law" when it suits them.
I remember reading about 4 years ago that presidential pardon powers for federal crimes are astonishingly broad and comprehensive. Too bad for the Biden crime family:
TREASON IS NOT INCLUDED
Hunter becomes the Hunted! u/#Correct
sure, just don't extradite.
Daddy President can make this entire thing go away, if that was really his daddy and not a man in a mask. Daddy President can fire Durham any time he wants, but he doesn't. It's not because there would be a backlash. Firing Durham would be nothing compared to the outrageous things he has already done in the last year. The fact that Durham still has a job is proof positive to me, at least, that this entire administration is fake.
He can't fire durham
Sure he can. Durham works for the Executive branch. Biden is head of the Executive branch. He can fire him any time he wants, but he does not.
Durham may be working under the military umbrella which would shield him... a la devolution.
Right, but we aren't supposed to know that. The public is supposed to think it's a normal administration. Under normal operations Biden would be able to fire Durham. If he can't, or won't, it's all the same. Biden, as he is presented to the general public, is NOT in charge.
Only the atty gen who appointed him can fire him Nixon fired his atty gen who wouldn't fire his
And the AG works for Biden. Biden can order him to fire Durham. Biden can 100% have Durham fired.
Didn't work for nixon imagine the optics
Bro that's not how that works. A special counsel can literally not be fired by the commander in chief. Otherwise Trump could've fired Mueller and avoided the whole first impeachment.
Durham is Special Counsel, so no.
This. Barr appointed him Special Counsel right before he retired. Special Counsels can't be fired.
Durham is not a King. He answers to someone. That someone is the Attorney General of the United States of America. Who in turn, works for the President of the United States of America. Who, according to the fake news, is Joe Biden. So yes, he can fire him.
Stop.
Learn first, then post.
How dense are you? What do you think makes a special council "special"?
There’s an extreme amount of useful information here. https://osc.gov/
You can’t fire Special Counsel.
Ha, good point. All I know for sure, is I've seen the man pretending to be Biden have his mask slip half off his face on video. I've seen enough CGI glitches of Biden to know what we are looking at is fake. Almost nothing we are shown is real.
If you can find it, look at the very first pic of the new Resident in the oval office by the fireplace with others. Then compare the bricks inside that fireplace with ANY picture of any president before him by the fireplace. Way different bricks in size and color.
It was this plus little things like before election day, he never campaigned, -just like Hillary and her green screens.
On election day: No one was happy, no energy.
Swearing in was early and wonky to say the least.
He was told what to do by the military during the first review.
He got a three gun salute for foreign dignitaries, not Presidents.
He was locked out of the building right after.
Then same day over in Congress, Nancy was told by her guard to "not say a thing" very sternly as they walked and the camera was a surprise to them.
Mueller had no idea what Fusion GPS is, so this is a really valid question.
He’s not the President.
It’s not even Joe Biden. What is it?
because daddy went bye bye a long time ago
That would be shocking; however, since:
https://qagg.news/?q=sentence+formation
831 -
"Sentence formation matters"
Thus,
https://qagg.news/?q=will+shock
928, 3728 and 3915 -
"Truth" and "the enormity of what is coming" "will shock the world"
whereas
https://qagg.news/?q=first+arrest
3716, 3717 -
"First indictment [unseal] will trigger mass pop awakening. First arrest will verify action and confirm future direction"
Massive amounts of 12 packs of pop will fall out of semi truck on interstate causing them to awake [explode]
Flood incoming.
found the midwesterner
Soda pop!
What if I said that where would I be from?
The 1940s
I think Epstein was the first arrest but could be wrong
Nothing says the indictment and arrest are the same person and if that is the case (that it is two different people), nothing says the arrest didn't come first.
Not shocking at all
Oh and I just read it was issued "17 months before the 2020 election". Interesting...
Also: https://qagg.news/?q=%23%23621
Nobody is sleeping tonight. Let that sink in. Q
Nobody is sleeping in Ottawa!
Soly Hhit!
Interesting timing with Scavino's subsequent Enter Sandman post... Nessun Dorma
I totally missed that one, wow.
And there was a [10] yesterday... Look out for 8's tomorrow.
https://greatawakening.win/p/141Y4cAvRt/wtf-is-going-on-with-pompeo/c/
This would line up close to a large sporting event that might look like a puppy show.
Ooohhh you’re on to something! We all know it’s actually time!
That guy just led the Bengals to the Super Bowl.
...Joe taking the Bengal to the big show....
...who dat?
It's gonna make the superbowl look like a puppy show... or something 🐶
Could white hats sneak in a commercial? Biggest watched show. Great time to wake more up!
🐅 and 🐏 should be interesting
Who Dey, not the Saints knock-off brand Who Dat
Stafford is also 9.
Think mirror !! mass pop awakening will trigger First indictment [unseal] ?
Trucker movement leading to mass pop awakening ?
Taking your statement one step further, I think the Truckers are confirming for all that “The people are awake and will not stand for governments dictating how we live our lives”. It’s a signal to the DS that they’ve lost control of us AND to the white hats that we are ready for the next stage.
Yes !!
https://qalerts.app/?q=%23%23556
Holy crap
Q556, Jan. 19 2018, two years before the plandemic. WTF!
Yep they knew
Truckers might trigger awakening but probably not the first unsealed indictment since:
https://qagg.news/?q=sentence+formation
831 -
"Sentence formation matters"
and
https://qagg.news/?q=will+trigger
3716, 3717 -
"First indictment [unseal] will trigger mass pop awakening. First arrest will verify action and confirm future direction."
Yes that is correct !! But could it be the other way around ? Mass pop awakening will trigger unsealing of First indictment ?
From a political perspective this makes a lot more sense. You want to limit the resistance and ensure that most people believe the first indictment, so you wait until you feel the population can do this and stand on their own. It’s a fool proof strategy, numbers support then go for the kill shot.
The oldest power play in the book, strength in numbers!
No. Clearly "First indictment" is the subject and "will trigger" is the verb and "mass pop awakening" is the object. Even a comma doesn't change that. "First, indictment will trigger mass awakening." or "First indictment, will, trigger etc."
if misspellings and sentence formation matter, then going strictly by the book on grammar rules doesnt really apply anymore
it could very well be that its just missing a word "First indictment [unseal] will trigger {upon} mass pop awakening"
That's thinking like a NWO communist who's using 1984 as though it were his bible.
That is a meaningful statement, but if you are going to start inserting guesses, you could create many meanings.
Very true
Well put, anon. And we know you meant to place no commas after the subject and auxiliary verb in the second example, but only before "etc." :)
"First indictment will trigger, etc."
Things That Make You Go Hmmmm:
Since etc. simply means "and so forth", why is there a rule that it always needs a comma before it?
I love cats and dogs and so forth. (No comma required)
I love cats and dogs, etc. (Suddenly comma required? Why? What if it weren't there? Would readers be thrown into a state of mental confusion? :) Keq
Wouldn't "I love cats and dogs etc." restrict the meaning of etc. to the dog? Which doesn't make much sense either.
Why would the addition of the words "etc." or "and so on" at the end of a list restrict the meaning of those words to the final item? I'm not familiar with that idea.
/wordnerd
I wondered just how "etcetera" is defined as a part of speech. Apparently few others have thought of that, because I got plenty of examples of usage and only Merriam Webster says it is a noun. However, it isn't just a noun, it is a placeholder in a list of similar nouns, to be used like an ellipsis (....) for something missing. The list needs to have items that go together, conceptually. If you say "dogs, cats, etc.," the implication is domestic animals, or pets. If you say "the cat and dog etc.," then the "etc." is implying a missing list of--what? More dogs? Dog toys? Now if "etc." can be called a modifier, then it refers to "dog" which is the nearest prior noun, i.e. the "antecedent." Getting antecedents wrong (lost antecedent) can totally change the meaning in a sentence and paragraph, and is probably my pet grammar gripe. (Insert picture of lost and confused Auntie Sedent doing Mr. Magoo-like things) Anyway, in the paucity of information about this universal shortcut, I did find that it must always be preceded with a comma.
Why does this have +9 / -0
In English, word order within sentences is critical.
"The dog bit the squirrel" is the opposite of "The squirrel bit the dog."
Maybe it is for when [9] wins the SB???
Matt Stafford is also a [9].
Ergo when the SB is over ??
How is this marker 9?
His jersey looks like an 8 to me?
He was definitely number 9 as the quarterback at LSU, and that picture was taken after he won the national championship. He’s also number 9 on the Bengal’s team.
It’s a 9.
i thought the same, look at the corner of the number on the bottom left and bottom right
The post a still from a video. It's a 9.
I know, hence me pointing towards the bottom corners. As they are different
Exactly
The bottom 2 corners arent the same. I'm saying its clearly a 9
That seems to be the consensus.
Just looked like a 8 to me with my tired, precoffee morning eyes.
Anyone else note the high count of stories involving Louisiana today (yesterday)?
There is a telegram post with a 4-year delta about the Supreme Court pick, HRC and Loretta Lynch on Feb 6 2018, wouldn't that be wild if Joehoe chose LL for his nominee.
I was thinking that as well. !
We are in year of the Tiger (Bengals) and are at war with Satan/Goat (Rams). No coincidences. Also, the NFL is scripted.
EDIT: My money is on the Bengals winning.
https://chinesenewyear.net/zodiac/tiger/#tiger-years
Ooh, I hadn’t considered this.
Yeah, I saw all the blatant hijinks in the NFL this year. It helps to be female and not overly familiar with football. My uncle who is a big NFL fan and really understands football thinks I’m full of it when I tell him that these games have been rigged.
Dan Scavino is a Jr.
Is odd that this picture is like 2-4 years old. It’s his LSU uniform. Not the Bengals one.
And it was a gif.
Hey, who knows, it might even be Biden himself that gets arrested. The law is that you cannot indict a sitting president. Well, he's an illegitimate president and a criminal. Will Biden be the first arrested to 'confirm future direction?'
I think the 2020 might be more important than the #9. Why? Because if he's wearing the same number with the Bengals, why not use a picture of him in a Bengals uniform? Not saying the 9 isn't important, but I think the 2020 is as well. Gee, what happened in 2020? The entire world flipped upside down with the election, and COVID. Maybe it's all about to flip back? Maybe the Super Bowl will have some fireworks? I've been thinking a while that the Super Bowl is the world's biggest live event. Something is coming....
Superbowl is also the largest human trafficking event of the year.
Like the Super Bowl in 2018, 2019, and 2020?
Maybe datefagging is still datefagging :p
I would say Super Bowl Sunday could be the least likely day of the year for anything significant to "happen" that is made known to the public
The 17th of each month is a close 2nd
I'm hoping this happens. I'm praying this happens. this First Indictment marker has been posted before. hope its this time
It may just be a countdown this time (as opposed to the indictment marker), given the Pompeo “10” comms yesterday. But at least with the trucker convoys and other comms, we see everything moving in the right direction.
When the filth , scum and traitorous acts of clan burden hit the wires daddy fake president can’t make it go away.
For real, how many times do we have to go over this.. Q confirmed the first arrest was Ghislaine Maxwell. There is not more "first arrests" coming.
Burrow has replaced Brady as the new Satanic QB. He sold his soul for fame. Cin will win the superbowl #9 MVP.
Brady is MAGA supporter and Trump fan!
And Olsteen, T D Jakes and Rick Warren were Godly man too. All is for cover!!!
had to be a fkn handshake
Always is....
had to be a fkn handshake
Sooooo, DuPoint, Rothschild, Windsor, Gates, Fauci, Schwaub? Any of the above will do.
soros also
I didn’t do a great job with the screenshot. It is his jersey number, which is partially covered by his hand.
Look on the front of the player's jersey