She, once again, spoke the truth and they just can't seem to handle it. Maybe it is because some of them are ones she was referring to that need to be executed.
If anyone "censured" me for saying 'people who commit crimes against humanity should be executed '... I'd have it printed on a T-shirt and the wear it in front of them.
Then I'd take out an add in the newspaper and list all of their names.
I'm against the death penalty because all life is precious and I believe the state should not have the right to kill someone and deprive them off their life. So I don't like her, or other people in this board, constant talk about execution or the kind of torture or pain they are lusting to inflict on the deep state actors. The lust for pain and violence and revenge is gross.
You very much have the right to believe that all life is precious. You have the right to support the rights of violent psychopaths and sociopaths. You have the right to express these beliefs. The problem with your stance is that you expect that law enforcement has to hunt down and arrest these people using violence. Taking a violent criminal into custody is dangerous and often times violent. You can have peace and security because others are willing to do violence to protect you. If you cannot see that your beliefs are black and white, then you are fortunate enough to have lived a very privileged life. You cannot locate and separate them from society without violence. You cannot live peacefully in a society where these criminals are allowed to roam free. What do you suggest we do? Imprison them? We have lots and lots of prisons with more prisoners than any other country. It is ugly, brutal and inhumane for most of these prisoners. Is this a better option? I'm not so certain. Vast resources are spent on our prison system. The majority of these funds could be used for more humane purposes to try and prevent the creation of dysfunctional members of society. I'm just curious if you have a solution to anti-social violent behavior?
Death is a good deterrent, and it definitely keeps the criminal from committing more crimes!
Here’s my thought exercise, which if taken to the extreme would result in abortion doctors being executed and no one with morals paying taxes:
There is a guy pointing a loaded gun at an innocent kid. The guy is a known killer and you have no doubt he is about to kill the kid. You are the only other person there and you have a loaded gun too, and the killer doesn’t know you’re standing behind him. The police are on your side and guaranteed you won’t be prosecuted. Do you shoot the bad guy?
Make no mistake, I wouldn't even have to think about it. Even if I was going to be prosecuted, I would do it. Going to prison because i killed a murderer that was going to kill a helpless innocent would be unfortunate for me, but completely acceptable. The laws do not impact my morality.
So they're never going to vote to de-certify if this is how they split on a simple, obvious issue like this! I felt certain Arizona was going to be one of the first ones to do the right thing.
They can play these tiddlywinks games within their own house but that shit won’t work when all legitimate effort to redress is exhausted and the people come for them. The people don’t care about bullshit rules and protocol, just results. Can’t wait to leave this desert cesspool.
It made me happy to hear that someone like Liz Cheney had been censured; however, now I realize it doesn't mean shit, which is good in the case of someone like Wendy, but in reality it is all theatrics, like @FatReggie said.
"Hate Speech". A term the left coined to keep people from speaking a truth they find inconvenient. Now, there is little to distinguish those in the Uniparty, two sides of the same coin. Hate speech is a product of wrong think. Interesting that those in office think they get to define both terms. The labels D or R matter not because they are of one political mind in which they get to do what they want and if you bluntly call them out, they are entitled to label and muzzle you. Time to vote them out, all who either voted for the censure and those that didn't vote. Toss them out first chance we get.
Frequently we are reminded here that the original Nuremburg trials were a kangaroo court, that many defendants were tortured, etc. But they were convicted of crimes against humanity and hanged. Isn't this like "hate crimes"? If someone with an agenda can make any claim of extra hate, an internal characteristic, they can inflict more punishment for a crime. I think that the people who have really committed crimes against humanity could be executed for ordinary murder and be just as dead. So unpopular as it may be, and though I generally agree with Wendy, I'm not in favor of introducing a new way/name to punish people because it is a two edged sword.
We are with you Wendy. Those people who committed crimes against humanity didn’t give people another thought. Their need for power and money negated their concern for fellow man. No excuse for not voting. That is your job. If you can’t be there for your job (barring ill health and a real family emergency), step down.
She, once again, spoke the truth and they just can't seem to handle it. Maybe it is because some of them are ones she was referring to that need to be executed.
What does it even mean to be censured by these scumbags, besides being a badge of honor?
Does it matter?
It's a great way to see who and how many of the enemy we have in the AZ Senate.
When the Bolcheviks own a politician they tell them how to vote. It's really very simple. EXECUTE ALL TRAITORS.
If anyone "censured" me for saying 'people who commit crimes against humanity should be executed '... I'd have it printed on a T-shirt and the wear it in front of them.
Then I'd take out an add in the newspaper and list all of their names.
Being censured doesn't even really mean shit.
She's not beholden to any of them, she's beholden to her constituents.
Seems politicians need to relearn that.
She didn't threaten anyone. She only said what she thinks should happen to them. Fucking pussies.
Pretty bad that we are now in a country where you can't even say what you personally believe without some negative repercussion for it.
Only someone who ought to be executed for such crimes is offended by what Wendy said.
I'm against the death penalty because all life is precious and I believe the state should not have the right to kill someone and deprive them off their life. So I don't like her, or other people in this board, constant talk about execution or the kind of torture or pain they are lusting to inflict on the deep state actors. The lust for pain and violence and revenge is gross.
War is gross and never pretty...
You need to grow a pair or move on since Crimes Against Humanity seems to offend you too Bud.
Sorry but I think when you commit some of the crimes that certain people are guilty of, you forfeit any claim to your life being precious.
By default, life is precious sure, but the things they continue to do revokes that for themselves.
God said kill the murderer.
Are you against God?
You very much have the right to believe that all life is precious. You have the right to support the rights of violent psychopaths and sociopaths. You have the right to express these beliefs. The problem with your stance is that you expect that law enforcement has to hunt down and arrest these people using violence. Taking a violent criminal into custody is dangerous and often times violent. You can have peace and security because others are willing to do violence to protect you. If you cannot see that your beliefs are black and white, then you are fortunate enough to have lived a very privileged life. You cannot locate and separate them from society without violence. You cannot live peacefully in a society where these criminals are allowed to roam free. What do you suggest we do? Imprison them? We have lots and lots of prisons with more prisoners than any other country. It is ugly, brutal and inhumane for most of these prisoners. Is this a better option? I'm not so certain. Vast resources are spent on our prison system. The majority of these funds could be used for more humane purposes to try and prevent the creation of dysfunctional members of society. I'm just curious if you have a solution to anti-social violent behavior?
Death is a good deterrent, and it definitely keeps the criminal from committing more crimes!
Here’s my thought exercise, which if taken to the extreme would result in abortion doctors being executed and no one with morals paying taxes:
There is a guy pointing a loaded gun at an innocent kid. The guy is a known killer and you have no doubt he is about to kill the kid. You are the only other person there and you have a loaded gun too, and the killer doesn’t know you’re standing behind him. The police are on your side and guaranteed you won’t be prosecuted. Do you shoot the bad guy?
Make no mistake, I wouldn't even have to think about it. Even if I was going to be prosecuted, I would do it. Going to prison because i killed a murderer that was going to kill a helpless innocent would be unfortunate for me, but completely acceptable. The laws do not impact my morality.
Censured by the guilty.
The Rope doesn't care.
Who are the 3 who voted against, and how do we get their autographs?
This is cool because Warren Peterson is my State Senator, I am in his district and voted for him. Yay.
I love how the fake media calls the "high level criminals" > "political opponents" instead.
I believe 24 people have a conflict of interest in this matter.
So they're never going to vote to de-certify if this is how they split on a simple, obvious issue like this! I felt certain Arizona was going to be one of the first ones to do the right thing.
Bet she doesn’t care.
Intermountain healthcare in Utah fired me for the same thing. I never did anything clinically wrong.
Bunch of fucking morons
Gaggle of faggots.
They can play these tiddlywinks games within their own house but that shit won’t work when all legitimate effort to redress is exhausted and the people come for them. The people don’t care about bullshit rules and protocol, just results. Can’t wait to leave this desert cesspool.
a BADGE OF HONOR TO BE CENSURED BY THOSE PEOPLE.
Kelly Townsend is one of us.
She opted out of defending. How is that being one of us? Fuck 5D chess. That bitch can't even do anything other than tweet limp shit anyway.
Censure all you want you coward pussies your time is coming
Saying the same thing got me a Lifetime Ban on Twitter
I like my company
She should have just read the Nuremberg code to them, instead of stating it like it was her idea. I love her! What a hero!
Censured?
So basically she gets frowned upon by a bunch of pussies?
Thank you for this, good to know.
It made me happy to hear that someone like Liz Cheney had been censured; however, now I realize it doesn't mean shit, which is good in the case of someone like Wendy, but in reality it is all theatrics, like @FatReggie said.
"Hate Speech". A term the left coined to keep people from speaking a truth they find inconvenient. Now, there is little to distinguish those in the Uniparty, two sides of the same coin. Hate speech is a product of wrong think. Interesting that those in office think they get to define both terms. The labels D or R matter not because they are of one political mind in which they get to do what they want and if you bluntly call them out, they are entitled to label and muzzle you. Time to vote them out, all who either voted for the censure and those that didn't vote. Toss them out first chance we get.
Puppets owned by the cabal, or some entities who answer to the cabal. Traitors.
Looks like at least 24 of those people are guilty.
If we don't hang the cheaters shame.on us. They tried to kill us.
Kill us. Don't forget that. I've no mercy for them or anyone who lacks the stomach to destroy their evil.
Frequently we are reminded here that the original Nuremburg trials were a kangaroo court, that many defendants were tortured, etc. But they were convicted of crimes against humanity and hanged. Isn't this like "hate crimes"? If someone with an agenda can make any claim of extra hate, an internal characteristic, they can inflict more punishment for a crime. I think that the people who have really committed crimes against humanity could be executed for ordinary murder and be just as dead. So unpopular as it may be, and though I generally agree with Wendy, I'm not in favor of introducing a new way/name to punish people because it is a two edged sword.
They can censure and get big mad, but the consequences from crimes against humanity is not something they will be getting out of.
Wendy should have said Hoffa’d. :) :) :)
We are with you Wendy. Those people who committed crimes against humanity didn’t give people another thought. Their need for power and money negated their concern for fellow man. No excuse for not voting. That is your job. If you can’t be there for your job (barring ill health and a real family emergency), step down.
ZERO excuse for not voting.
Depends.
If present and didn't vote - Coward
If not present and didn't vote - Pointless because it's a waste of time.
It’s never ‘pointless’ to vote when you represent the people of your community. You are elected to do a job…and voting is a part of the job.
I agree in general... But there's not "zero" excuse.
See, Republican playbook is to abstain from voting or pretend to be absent when they already know the outcome to avoid stirring the pot.
Then they hide behind "it wouldn't have changed anything anyway".
3 not comprised. 4 possible threats to them concerning their families. 20 to be gitmoed .
um, more likely the 24 are paid off. Not the 4.
Warren Peterson is my State Senator, I am in his district and voted for him. Yay.