No different from USA at the end of the day. Our governments are being interfered with by persons not yet identified. If they don't like the plan they crash the economy! Boris & Rishi was doing a good job of that before. MPs said enough!
Message 'if we don't like the people in authority we will get rid of them!'
Is that true though? A problem with "The Plan" (per Q), at least with regards to an outside view of it, is that it looks exactly the same as the Globalist Plan. The only difference is (presumably) how easy it is to see, and hopefully the end result (because of how easy it is to see). Thus project Warp Speed. If it goes faster (like it is), massive amounts of people see the fraud.
There are always a percent of people who see the fraud. In the Soviet takeover for example, quite a few fought back. It just wasn't enough. It is the percent of the population who see the fraud that is the key to which side wins.
The only path out of the slavery we have been living in for millennia is for We The People to stand up for ourselves. We need to eliminate the control structures that have been built by the aristocracy. It isn't about "getting the right people in leadership," it's about understanding that the entire concept of a Centralization of Authority is the fraud. It doesn't matter who is leading the UK (or the US, etc.). It is coming to a deep seated realization that our whole concept of a National Government is a fraud. This fraud is based on the frauds of Rulership and Jurisdiction.
Rulership, i.e. Central Authority inevitably infringes on our Inalienable Rights. It can't do otherwise. This fraud AKA what it means "to Rule." is ultimately a fraud of Jurisdiction. Each of us is the King or Queen of our own lives (and in any reasonable society, our property). We are all Sovereign, and that is our jurisdiction. When a Sovereign Government, AKA a Central Authority declares jurisdiction over our lives, our property, "for the greater good" (or National Security, or whatever reason they give) that is where the fraud happens. When the Central Authority builds "infrastructure," (physical, economic, etc.) that requires us to rely on it, it allows that Central Authority to claim jurisdiction over our lives. It is through creating need that this jurisdictional fraud by a Central Authority is implemented.
In order for We The People to get rid of that Central Authority and gain full Jurisdiction of our own lives we must feel the need to get rid of our Centralized Authority Governmental System entirely.
That's going to take a lot of pain. I think we have to see the "End of the World" plan (AKA The Utopia Plan) in it's entirety. We have to see where such a system inevitably leads (through their jurisdictional fraud), in this case at Warp Speed so the fraud is revealed to a large enough percentage of the population.
I don't know how long it will take, but I think we still have a ways to go.
As I understand it the Q plan is to return power to the people, whilst at the same time exposing the DS (add your preferred descriptor) and have them removed by legal means.
I am uncertain what your point is, it seems you want to live in some sort of non-governmental commune. Not sure hoe you economic situation would work, how are amenities provided and how are decisions taken.
What I have presented was what my research suggests is the real problem. It wasn't intended to provide a solution.
Not to say I can't make arguments for solutions, I can and have many times. The first step in any solution however, is in everyone seeing the REAL PROBLEM. The problem is not the Cabal (per se), but what they have done. What they have done is create the belief in the need for a Centralized Authority. We believe we must be Ruled. By this belief they can put in whatever they want. They can put in a "good Ruler" when they need to dial it back a bit, but the Centralized Authority is still in charge, committing the same fraud.
You assume I suggested a solution ("some sort of non-governmental commune") when I have offered nothing in that regard. I certainly didn't suggest anything (that I am aware of) that would promote what I quoted from you.
how are amenities provided and how are decisions taken
What "amenities" do you suggest we need (presumably you mean from some Central Authority)? Why do amenities need to be "provided" (given to us) by anyone? Who is providing them? Who is paying for them? Who is making them? How are they taken from those who are paying for them and/or making them and being provided to you?
Who is making decisions? What decisions need to be made?
If I live in a town, do I need a National Government to decide what the towns school teaches? Do I need a National Government (or any group of people) to force my children to learn what they deign important? Do I need a National Government to decide what are the best laws for the local community? Do I need a State Government for that? What decisions could a National and/or State Government possibly need to make to help me live in harmony with my neighbors?
Things like National Security are only necessary because the Cabal makes all wars. Things like International Relations are only necessary because the Cabal runs all countries. We The People never make war. A group of people will never attack another group of people unless they need food, or some other necessity, or because there is a propaganda campaign to make people believe there is a need (that almost certainly doesn't actually exist).
It is the Cabal that takes over countries for more resources. They do it all the time because they want it all. And they convince us to kill each other so they can achieve their goals. "National Security" is a fraud. It is a Con. The Cabal is always both sides.
I think just like you. It's amazing how people will imagine that you have proposed a fully fledged solution, when all you did was point out some obvious problems with the current system. I too also have some potential solutions, or at least starting points, up my sleeves.
The USA is unique as to how it is set up and run and our constitution that backs all of us up. If you want to have a nation, you need a "government" or a leader. USA is set up so that there are many checks and balances between the elected Federal Government, elected State government and we the people. Our government has specific jobs and duties they are supposed to be doing beyond anything else they come up with to do. THE current government is undermining everything it is elected to do. Keep our nation's Sovereignty protected is a big one and it is failing that big time atm. Nations need a head because, Nations need to interact with other Nations and Need a national military to keep other nations from overrunning the place and taking over. Trade with other Nations is another reason to have a government. Government's that are too large (who bi pass the checks n balances to get what they want) or too small (dictator) end up screwing everyone in that nation over. IMO.
The purpose of Govt is to protect the rights and property of the people. It should do that and no more. The idea that this protection isn’t needed or that everyone should protect themselves would ignore human nature since the beginning of history.
The idea that this protection isn’t needed or that everyone should protect themselves would ignore human nature since the beginning of history.
Two things.
First, my research suggests that (almost) all governments "since the beginning of history" (what we call the beginning of history) has been controlled by the same Cabal the entire time. This fraud of "Ruler" has been perpetrated by the same people for all of our history.
Second. No one said anything about not having any groupings. No one is talking about throwing "strength in numbers" out the window. This is about Jurisdiction. Any laws, that in any way whatsoever infringe on the Inalienable Rights of the individual are perpetrating the same fraud. The idea that "the group" (no matter what group that is) should have Rights above the individual is the Jurisdictional Fraud I am talking about.
Take for example the end of the fifth amendment:
nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.
This is the concept of "eminent domain." It says "the desires of the many" (where really they mean the Rulers of the many) outweigh the "Rights of the Individual."
That is exactly the same fraud. This is nothing but Thugery. Any government that claims that the individuals Inalienable Rights are less important than the government in any way is committing this fraud that has been passed on, from Generation to Generation of Cabal Leadership from the "beginning of history."
The only thing that a government or leader should be for is enforcing an agreed upon document/constitution of the terms of individual sovereignty.
Sounds paradoxical, but then again Gods decree of free will sounds paradoxical too, but it isnt.
I don't necessary agree with "common descent." Also, the definition of "territory" is very important and not well understood in the legal sense. It is "territory" (AKA Jurisdiction AKA the area over which a Sovereign's Word (diction) is Law (Juris)) where all the fuckery happens. That doesn't mean territory has to be defined that way, but it is how it is defined. It is that definition that is fundamental to the fraud.
Nevertheless, without getting too strict with some of the words, I agree with your definition. Notice that no where in there is there a requirement for a Ruler as demanded through abuse of the legal conceptualization of Territory.
Because he's not permanent. It's a means to an end. He's a central figure that's shined a light on the corrupt establishment where the power is centralized.
Anarchy doesn't mean "no government" or "no leader" or "chaos," or "no laws," it means No Ruler. That is the definition. It literally means "without ruler." A Ruler, by definition, is someone (a King e.g.) or group of someones (an aristocracy e.g.) who has more Rights than the individual. They have the power to take away from the individual if they so choose. They have that Right, and the individual has no Right to stop them. A government "of, by, and for" the people can't have more Rights than the individuals that make up that society. Because the society is the government.
The word "anarchy" has been promoted with negative connotations because if people ever realize what it really means on a fundamental level they will revolt immediately. I don't just mean what I have exposed here, but I mean deep down inside, to grok what it means to live without a ruler.
The Cabal Trains us to think the way you have just suggested through school (made by them) and propaganda (they have always owned all the media). The "more basic instincts" that need to be kept in check have always been manipulated by their propaganda. I suggest you have no idea what our "more basic instincts" really are without the Cabal leading us around by the nose for thousands of years. I know I certainly don't.
I agree with most of the stuff you put on GAW but this isnt something I could ever get behind no matter what you want to call it or how you want to justify it. Men require government to contain their baser instincts.
The problem isnt government, it is that the People failed in our duty to remain vigilant in our inspection and control of the government. We got fat and lazy and allowed material gain to rule our worlds. We allowed the government to keep secrets from us. We allowed tyrannical creep through the decades. We gave up Liberty for temporary safety and material goods.
How this happened is debatable but I believe we fell victims to a flawless marketing campaign from things like the Saturday Evening Posts pics of idyllic American life, to images from Hollywood and TV and even the concept of "The American Dream" and "two cars in every garage". Comfort became our God and political intrigue and sexual indiscretion became our national joke. "You cant fight city hall". The casting couch. Keeping up with the Jones'. Our culture is filled with these "truisms".
What we face now isnt the governments fault. It is our fault for allowing it. Governments will always trend towards tyranny. Our Founding Fathers knew this and made a document that should have protected us through time. But we forgot what the words meant. It is a Republic, if you can keep it.
My opinion is that the foundation is sound. The rest of the building is full of rot. And that is our fault.
The problem isnt government, it is that the People failed in our duty to remain vigilant in our inspection and control of the government.
The problem with this concept is one of scope. We The People never "failed in our duty." My research suggests the same people have been running this show for between 3000 and 12,000 years.
Think about that.
3000 years ago is when all "history" began. I mean we have some stuff from before that, but it's so much guess work it's ludicrous. Most of those "guesses" come from agents of the Cabal. The number of lies in our history is absolutely mind blowing once you start really digging in. Almost nothing we think is true, turns out to have any truth in it with further digging into the surrounding context.
My research suggests that everything you think you have learned from history is the lesson they want you to believe. We never lost our vigilance. We never had control of the government. We have been RULED by the same people for ALL OF HUMAN HISTORY. (What we think of as human history. There were, according to the evidence, previous global civilizations before ours. The idea that "human civilization" began 10,000ish years ago is a lie that dissolves trivially as soon as you start digging into the evidence in earnest.) Further, they have lied about everything, to hide their rule and ensure we remain unwitting slaves. We The People have been the slaves of the same Aristocracy for all that time. Even where we believe we are "free" we never were. Not on the scale of countries (or States, etc.).
I will be substantially supporting some of those statements in upcoming work. The far back in history stuff is stuff I may make a formal case for, but it won't be part of my present body of work because the cognitive dissonance is too great. Plus I have to talk about religion, and notably the Jews, and those are both forbidden topics to show fuckery within.
Hmm, I wonder why that is.
Could it be Social Engineering? I'm just talking about showing the evidence. It is socially illegal to show evidence in certain areas. My investigation has shown intentional fuckery to make certain topics verbotten. It keeps people from seeing the obvious.
We have been fucked with on levels that are unimaginable. Part of that is the deeply ingrained belief of what government is.
Government means "helmsmen." It doesn't mean "Captain", it means the person who steers the ship. We use Government as Captain exclusively, i.e. government Rules. It's a fraud, 100%. I suggest the reason you don't agree with me is because it is a concept that you are not taking the time to understand. You are placing within my words, ideas in your own mind that I am not saying nor do I mean.
I mean, I don't know if that's why you disagree with me, but that has been my experience so far. When people disagree with me on this, it has always been that they don't understand. I don't mean no one has disagreed with me on specifics for other reasons, but on the basic concept itself, it has always been one of not understanding.
I further suggest the reason you don't understand is that you have been trained to not understand. We The People, for at least 3000 years have all been trained to not understand the concepts I am trying to convey.
There is only one corporation in the world, and always has been. The idea that "big business" likes things one way or another has nothing to do with reality. They own everything. They make the rules for, and the rules that appear to be against them. They are always both sides in every conflict, including the making of laws.
For example, all laws that promote "regulations" designed to "limit" big business were written by them. For a couple rather important examples of this, see the Clayton Anti-Trust Act, which is America's "most important anti-big business legislation." It was written by John W. Davis, who was the personal lawyer of Rockefeller, Morgan, and Rothschild (among about a thousand other things, like Woodrow Wilson's Solicitor General, founding President of the CFR, etc., etc.). The Federal Reserve Act, the greatest piece of economic fuckery ever, was written for Woodrow Wilson and crew by Carter Glass, who, 20 years later, also happened to write the act that created the Securities and Exchange Commission, which was designed to ensure that the Stock Market wouldn't be manipulated because of what happened when it was manipulated all to hell to kick off The Great Depression. The SEC, rather than perform this function, insures fuckery in the Stock Market because of how it actually works, through Centralization of Authority using almost the exact same set up as the Federal Reserve does to achieve similar goals with the money supply.
I doubt Boris will be back, he's been non-existent since he went. That all went very weird in 2020 when he was going to do herd immunity, then suddenly 'got Covid' and came out of hospital acting completely different. I think at some point he got insulated.
Exactly. I've thought the same thing. Ever since he left the hospital so they say, he never acted the same again. Something got to him and can no longer be trusted.
King Charles holding open the door for the globalist is exactly like our Southern Border. I think King Charles is in a race to see how fast he looses the Kingdom. Can Disney please pick him up and give him a spot ruling one of their Kingdoms, perhaps one he cannot lose.
We haven't had monarchy rule for a long time. We did though get rid of the first King Charles - chopped his head off - and replaced him with a government of the people, with Cromwell.
Also a bit like the US the Prime Minister remains in post, along with government until a new PM has been chosen be it in this case a resignation or a general election.
Cromwell was a Masonic puppet. It wasn’t really a government of the people. Not trying to sound like an asshole. He was payed off to allow Jews back into England. Along with the Jewish crowd came the Rothschilds!
Such is the fable of the Cromwellian origin of Freemasonry, which we owe entirely to the inventive genius of the Abbe Larudan. And, yet, it is not wholly a story of the imagination, but is really founded on an extraordinary distortion of the facts of history. https://www.universalfreemasonry.org/en/history-freemasonry/oliver-cromwell
Please provide your evidence that Cromwell was paid off to allow the Jews back in late 17th Century.
Mayer Rothschild - founder of the Rothschild bank 1744-1812 certainly didn't arrive with the mid 17th Century return, indeed was not born until 100 years after Cromwell's death, indeed he didn't even emerge onto the scene until mid 18th century in Frankfurt. Rothschild bank was not founded until 1812.
In pre-fashion show speech a few weeks ago, Kanye decided to throw in a line that the situation was unmanageable, and I don't think he was talking about the show.
From Kanye West recent "Last Week" upload. "This is a different level of nuclear activity that no one will recover from," Kanye adds. "The guy from [redacted] couldn't sell enough companies to cure this level of global warming that you're going to experience."
Truss is a placeholder in the UK's unfolding tyranny. There are 5 stages of a Tyranny and its psychological effects on the general public. I'll mention the first 3 stages because this is what the UK is dealing with right now. In an unfolding tyranny the population always finds itself initially in a state of Disbelief. As the tyranny unfolds, Anger is the next reaction the public experiences. As it quickly grows, this is the point to which the regime is most vulnerable and it needs to act to quell the growing anger. This is also the point to which the population has the best chance of overthrowing the regime and thereby ending it. The preferred method of the regime is to trick the populace in believing things have changed and the tyranny is coming to an end. This is favored over using force because doing so may ignite and only fan the flames of anger and protest/rebellion. It is the Bargain/offer stage most prevalently used by the tyrannical regime. It is older than time immemorial itself and has been used again and again throughout history. The Bargain/offer is made between the public and the ruling regime. Sometimes a deal is made with the betrayal of an opposing leader or/and others.
The 'change for the better' is a preferred method for accomplishing this. Look at NY Governor Andrew Cuomo and how he was decapitated. At first he was venerated, then he became over-exposed and tarnished by scandal. The MSM then suddenly turned on him. The regime promised him an easy out if he agreed to fall on his sword. His resignation came with dismissal of all charges. Who replaced him? Another tyrant in Kathy Hochul. She is even more hated than Cuomo was. Look at the UK, they did the same thing with Boris Johnson as they did with Cuomo. Who replaced Johnson? Johnson's hand picked Liz Trust. In Australia the same thing happened. I believe Liz Trust is a place holder for someone else, who will not only follow the democidal policies of Johnson, but will be far more ruthless in doing so.
She gets a 20% severance payout (£19k), returns to her £84k MP job (plus expenses) AND gets an allowance of £115k a year for life
Not bad for 44 days in a job.
Perhaps the real dismantling of the deep state starts with the UK. We know that City of London is a Power House. Now with the Queen Mum gone and Parliament is shaken to the ground...
Anyone would think that the people have to be shown ...
It is really really interesting. In my experience of all this, I am finding people are more aware. To have a Prime Minister in for 6 weeks is really shocking. To see the Conservative Party turn on each other like this is so obvious to anyone. A pit of snakes serving their own interests, very clear to see.
Liz Truss has been in politics for a long time, they know she is crap at engaging people and being a PM but they still let her run??? Why??? There is no better unifying candidate??? Steve Baker or Iain Duncan Smith would have been way better.
It is making people be more reflective around me, asking themselves do we matter? Who is in charge? Dare I say it they are seeing string pullers being in charge?
It is being reported that there is the Klaus /IMF candidate or Boris in the running. It is showing there is no one representing the average person.
In a time of extreme distress to people with cost of living, heat or eat type thing, I would say that the vast majority in people in the UK view that they have been disenfranchised with no one representing them.
How will the DS spin this I wonder??? Its a complete shite show, lots of people saying its a globalist coup. I have never heard the word GLOBALIST used so much as I have in the last two weeks.
There is so much going on that I have trouble keeping track, which is what many want, I am sure. Boris went to Ukraine to insist that there be no peace talks, and that Ukraine should push valiantly ahead. As he stepped down, he seemed to already want everyone to know he would be back.
So he goes there, on some "there can be no peace here" attitude and now wants to step back into the role he left? How does that happen? Stupid question, I know, since these people threw rules out long ago..
There is gonna be a lot of this sort of thing, because things will be so screwed up and they won’t have money to do anything about it, or pay government people to do their jobs. The pressures will be great.
Boris, having f'kd off, can stay f'kd off. He's a globalist; he's a son of another globalist who is on record advocating a max UK population of 15 million - 20 million tops (currently ~68 million).
If all the Johnsons would like to go first that would be fine.
Maybe the WHs would like to interview BoJo for his alleged participation in the extension of surveillance of DJT's campaign, etc.
In other news ... the biosphere is on a starvation diet because of historically low levels of atmospheric CO2. New York was once under a mile of ice, yet, that retreated northwards despite there being no people, industry, planes/trains/automobiles/ships, BBQs or effing patio heaters. How queer.
This will now be, what, the fifth new prime minister without the people of the UK getting to vote on it? Maybe only letting one party vote for the leader is a bad idea?
Globalist 1:0 People of UK
No different from USA at the end of the day. Our governments are being interfered with by persons not yet identified. If they don't like the plan they crash the economy! Boris & Rishi was doing a good job of that before. MPs said enough!
Message 'if we don't like the people in authority we will get rid of them!'
Is that true though? A problem with "The Plan" (per Q), at least with regards to an outside view of it, is that it looks exactly the same as the Globalist Plan. The only difference is (presumably) how easy it is to see, and hopefully the end result (because of how easy it is to see). Thus project Warp Speed. If it goes faster (like it is), massive amounts of people see the fraud.
There are always a percent of people who see the fraud. In the Soviet takeover for example, quite a few fought back. It just wasn't enough. It is the percent of the population who see the fraud that is the key to which side wins.
The only path out of the slavery we have been living in for millennia is for We The People to stand up for ourselves. We need to eliminate the control structures that have been built by the aristocracy. It isn't about "getting the right people in leadership," it's about understanding that the entire concept of a Centralization of Authority is the fraud. It doesn't matter who is leading the UK (or the US, etc.). It is coming to a deep seated realization that our whole concept of a National Government is a fraud. This fraud is based on the frauds of Rulership and Jurisdiction.
Rulership, i.e. Central Authority inevitably infringes on our Inalienable Rights. It can't do otherwise. This fraud AKA what it means "to Rule." is ultimately a fraud of Jurisdiction. Each of us is the King or Queen of our own lives (and in any reasonable society, our property). We are all Sovereign, and that is our jurisdiction. When a Sovereign Government, AKA a Central Authority declares jurisdiction over our lives, our property, "for the greater good" (or National Security, or whatever reason they give) that is where the fraud happens. When the Central Authority builds "infrastructure," (physical, economic, etc.) that requires us to rely on it, it allows that Central Authority to claim jurisdiction over our lives. It is through creating need that this jurisdictional fraud by a Central Authority is implemented.
In order for We The People to get rid of that Central Authority and gain full Jurisdiction of our own lives we must feel the need to get rid of our Centralized Authority Governmental System entirely.
That's going to take a lot of pain. I think we have to see the "End of the World" plan (AKA The Utopia Plan) in it's entirety. We have to see where such a system inevitably leads (through their jurisdictional fraud), in this case at Warp Speed so the fraud is revealed to a large enough percentage of the population.
I don't know how long it will take, but I think we still have a ways to go.
As I understand it the Q plan is to return power to the people, whilst at the same time exposing the DS (add your preferred descriptor) and have them removed by legal means.
I am uncertain what your point is, it seems you want to live in some sort of non-governmental commune. Not sure hoe you economic situation would work, how are amenities provided and how are decisions taken.
What I have presented was what my research suggests is the real problem. It wasn't intended to provide a solution.
Not to say I can't make arguments for solutions, I can and have many times. The first step in any solution however, is in everyone seeing the REAL PROBLEM. The problem is not the Cabal (per se), but what they have done. What they have done is create the belief in the need for a Centralized Authority. We believe we must be Ruled. By this belief they can put in whatever they want. They can put in a "good Ruler" when they need to dial it back a bit, but the Centralized Authority is still in charge, committing the same fraud.
You assume I suggested a solution ("some sort of non-governmental commune") when I have offered nothing in that regard. I certainly didn't suggest anything (that I am aware of) that would promote what I quoted from you.
What "amenities" do you suggest we need (presumably you mean from some Central Authority)? Why do amenities need to be "provided" (given to us) by anyone? Who is providing them? Who is paying for them? Who is making them? How are they taken from those who are paying for them and/or making them and being provided to you?
Who is making decisions? What decisions need to be made?
If I live in a town, do I need a National Government to decide what the towns school teaches? Do I need a National Government (or any group of people) to force my children to learn what they deign important? Do I need a National Government to decide what are the best laws for the local community? Do I need a State Government for that? What decisions could a National and/or State Government possibly need to make to help me live in harmony with my neighbors?
Things like National Security are only necessary because the Cabal makes all wars. Things like International Relations are only necessary because the Cabal runs all countries. We The People never make war. A group of people will never attack another group of people unless they need food, or some other necessity, or because there is a propaganda campaign to make people believe there is a need (that almost certainly doesn't actually exist).
It is the Cabal that takes over countries for more resources. They do it all the time because they want it all. And they convince us to kill each other so they can achieve their goals. "National Security" is a fraud. It is a Con. The Cabal is always both sides.
I think just like you. It's amazing how people will imagine that you have proposed a fully fledged solution, when all you did was point out some obvious problems with the current system. I too also have some potential solutions, or at least starting points, up my sleeves.
The USA is unique as to how it is set up and run and our constitution that backs all of us up. If you want to have a nation, you need a "government" or a leader. USA is set up so that there are many checks and balances between the elected Federal Government, elected State government and we the people. Our government has specific jobs and duties they are supposed to be doing beyond anything else they come up with to do. THE current government is undermining everything it is elected to do. Keep our nation's Sovereignty protected is a big one and it is failing that big time atm. Nations need a head because, Nations need to interact with other Nations and Need a national military to keep other nations from overrunning the place and taking over. Trade with other Nations is another reason to have a government. Government's that are too large (who bi pass the checks n balances to get what they want) or too small (dictator) end up screwing everyone in that nation over. IMO.
What is a "nation" and why would you want one?
The purpose of Govt is to protect the rights and property of the people. It should do that and no more. The idea that this protection isn’t needed or that everyone should protect themselves would ignore human nature since the beginning of history.
Two things.
First, my research suggests that (almost) all governments "since the beginning of history" (what we call the beginning of history) has been controlled by the same Cabal the entire time. This fraud of "Ruler" has been perpetrated by the same people for all of our history.
Second. No one said anything about not having any groupings. No one is talking about throwing "strength in numbers" out the window. This is about Jurisdiction. Any laws, that in any way whatsoever infringe on the Inalienable Rights of the individual are perpetrating the same fraud. The idea that "the group" (no matter what group that is) should have Rights above the individual is the Jurisdictional Fraud I am talking about.
Take for example the end of the fifth amendment:
This is the concept of "eminent domain." It says "the desires of the many" (where really they mean the Rulers of the many) outweigh the "Rights of the Individual."
That is exactly the same fraud. This is nothing but Thugery. Any government that claims that the individuals Inalienable Rights are less important than the government in any way is committing this fraud that has been passed on, from Generation to Generation of Cabal Leadership from the "beginning of history."
The only thing that a government or leader should be for is enforcing an agreed upon document/constitution of the terms of individual sovereignty. Sounds paradoxical, but then again Gods decree of free will sounds paradoxical too, but it isnt.
a large body of people united by common descent, history, culture, or language, inhabiting a particular country or territory??
Excellent reply.
I don't necessary agree with "common descent." Also, the definition of "territory" is very important and not well understood in the legal sense. It is "territory" (AKA Jurisdiction AKA the area over which a Sovereign's Word (diction) is Law (Juris)) where all the fuckery happens. That doesn't mean territory has to be defined that way, but it is how it is defined. It is that definition that is fundamental to the fraud.
Nevertheless, without getting too strict with some of the words, I agree with your definition. Notice that no where in there is there a requirement for a Ruler as demanded through abuse of the legal conceptualization of Territory.
GEOTUS stands for God emperor correct? Where does that figure into entirely abolished centralized authority Governmental system?
Because he's not permanent. It's a means to an end. He's a central figure that's shined a light on the corrupt establishment where the power is centralized.
That is the right question to ask.
Great comment. Thanks for taking the time to write it.
So basically you espouse anarchy.
Ill pass. Men need government to keep their more base instincts in check.
Anarchy doesn't mean "no government" or "no leader" or "chaos," or "no laws," it means No Ruler. That is the definition. It literally means "without ruler." A Ruler, by definition, is someone (a King e.g.) or group of someones (an aristocracy e.g.) who has more Rights than the individual. They have the power to take away from the individual if they so choose. They have that Right, and the individual has no Right to stop them. A government "of, by, and for" the people can't have more Rights than the individuals that make up that society. Because the society is the government.
The word "anarchy" has been promoted with negative connotations because if people ever realize what it really means on a fundamental level they will revolt immediately. I don't just mean what I have exposed here, but I mean deep down inside, to grok what it means to live without a ruler.
The Cabal Trains us to think the way you have just suggested through school (made by them) and propaganda (they have always owned all the media). The "more basic instincts" that need to be kept in check have always been manipulated by their propaganda. I suggest you have no idea what our "more basic instincts" really are without the Cabal leading us around by the nose for thousands of years. I know I certainly don't.
I agree with most of the stuff you put on GAW but this isnt something I could ever get behind no matter what you want to call it or how you want to justify it. Men require government to contain their baser instincts.
The problem isnt government, it is that the People failed in our duty to remain vigilant in our inspection and control of the government. We got fat and lazy and allowed material gain to rule our worlds. We allowed the government to keep secrets from us. We allowed tyrannical creep through the decades. We gave up Liberty for temporary safety and material goods.
How this happened is debatable but I believe we fell victims to a flawless marketing campaign from things like the Saturday Evening Posts pics of idyllic American life, to images from Hollywood and TV and even the concept of "The American Dream" and "two cars in every garage". Comfort became our God and political intrigue and sexual indiscretion became our national joke. "You cant fight city hall". The casting couch. Keeping up with the Jones'. Our culture is filled with these "truisms".
What we face now isnt the governments fault. It is our fault for allowing it. Governments will always trend towards tyranny. Our Founding Fathers knew this and made a document that should have protected us through time. But we forgot what the words meant. It is a Republic, if you can keep it.
My opinion is that the foundation is sound. The rest of the building is full of rot. And that is our fault.
The problem with this concept is one of scope. We The People never "failed in our duty." My research suggests the same people have been running this show for between 3000 and 12,000 years.
Think about that.
3000 years ago is when all "history" began. I mean we have some stuff from before that, but it's so much guess work it's ludicrous. Most of those "guesses" come from agents of the Cabal. The number of lies in our history is absolutely mind blowing once you start really digging in. Almost nothing we think is true, turns out to have any truth in it with further digging into the surrounding context.
My research suggests that everything you think you have learned from history is the lesson they want you to believe. We never lost our vigilance. We never had control of the government. We have been RULED by the same people for ALL OF HUMAN HISTORY. (What we think of as human history. There were, according to the evidence, previous global civilizations before ours. The idea that "human civilization" began 10,000ish years ago is a lie that dissolves trivially as soon as you start digging into the evidence in earnest.) Further, they have lied about everything, to hide their rule and ensure we remain unwitting slaves. We The People have been the slaves of the same Aristocracy for all that time. Even where we believe we are "free" we never were. Not on the scale of countries (or States, etc.).
I will be substantially supporting some of those statements in upcoming work. The far back in history stuff is stuff I may make a formal case for, but it won't be part of my present body of work because the cognitive dissonance is too great. Plus I have to talk about religion, and notably the Jews, and those are both forbidden topics to show fuckery within.
Hmm, I wonder why that is.
Could it be Social Engineering? I'm just talking about showing the evidence. It is socially illegal to show evidence in certain areas. My investigation has shown intentional fuckery to make certain topics verbotten. It keeps people from seeing the obvious.
We have been fucked with on levels that are unimaginable. Part of that is the deeply ingrained belief of what government is.
Government means "helmsmen." It doesn't mean "Captain", it means the person who steers the ship. We use Government as Captain exclusively, i.e. government Rules. It's a fraud, 100%. I suggest the reason you don't agree with me is because it is a concept that you are not taking the time to understand. You are placing within my words, ideas in your own mind that I am not saying nor do I mean.
I mean, I don't know if that's why you disagree with me, but that has been my experience so far. When people disagree with me on this, it has always been that they don't understand. I don't mean no one has disagreed with me on specifics for other reasons, but on the basic concept itself, it has always been one of not understanding.
I further suggest the reason you don't understand is that you have been trained to not understand. We The People, for at least 3000 years have all been trained to not understand the concepts I am trying to convey.
How about this for a good and proper way to start? http://reclaimingtherepublic.org/
What if that was the intended plan by the WHs?
High Tax High Spend Big Government provides many opportunities for certain big business's. Just like all the money pouring into Ukraine.
The Crashing of the economy was mostly fearmongering - just like covid jabs etc.
The conservative party didn't elect the right person so try again, try try try again until to elect the person we want you to.
There is only one corporation in the world, and always has been. The idea that "big business" likes things one way or another has nothing to do with reality. They own everything. They make the rules for, and the rules that appear to be against them. They are always both sides in every conflict, including the making of laws.
For example, all laws that promote "regulations" designed to "limit" big business were written by them. For a couple rather important examples of this, see the Clayton Anti-Trust Act, which is America's "most important anti-big business legislation." It was written by John W. Davis, who was the personal lawyer of Rockefeller, Morgan, and Rothschild (among about a thousand other things, like Woodrow Wilson's Solicitor General, founding President of the CFR, etc., etc.). The Federal Reserve Act, the greatest piece of economic fuckery ever, was written for Woodrow Wilson and crew by Carter Glass, who, 20 years later, also happened to write the act that created the Securities and Exchange Commission, which was designed to ensure that the Stock Market wouldn't be manipulated because of what happened when it was manipulated all to hell to kick off The Great Depression. The SEC, rather than perform this function, insures fuckery in the Stock Market because of how it actually works, through Centralization of Authority using almost the exact same set up as the Federal Reserve does to achieve similar goals with the money supply.
Zerohedge comment:
"4 Chancellors, 3 Home Secretaries, 2 Monarchs, and now 3 PMs in four f**king months"
My comment:
The globalists have lost the plot....
Derailment in warp speed.
I doubt Boris will be back, he's been non-existent since he went. That all went very weird in 2020 when he was going to do herd immunity, then suddenly 'got Covid' and came out of hospital acting completely different. I think at some point he got insulated.
Exactly. I've thought the same thing. Ever since he left the hospital so they say, he never acted the same again. Something got to him and can no longer be trusted.
Can't help but reference this line of thinking by Q, regarding 'temp hires' (Truss's 44 days).
u/#q2957
WEF great reset is what is going on.
Track resignations.
u/#q44
It says 45 days in the clip. I was thinking 45 an interesting no. of days as equal to Trumps presidency.
King Charles holding open the door for the globalist is exactly like our Southern Border. I think King Charles is in a race to see how fast he looses the Kingdom. Can Disney please pick him up and give him a spot ruling one of their Kingdoms, perhaps one he cannot lose.
Truss did a quick in and out.
Naughty girl.
Yeah Baby! Yeah!
Was Truss ever in office?
Well if England’s Parliament collapses, they still have their Monarchy.
We haven't had monarchy rule for a long time. We did though get rid of the first King Charles - chopped his head off - and replaced him with a government of the people, with Cromwell.
Also a bit like the US the Prime Minister remains in post, along with government until a new PM has been chosen be it in this case a resignation or a general election.
Cromwell was a Masonic puppet. It wasn’t really a government of the people. Not trying to sound like an asshole. He was payed off to allow Jews back into England. Along with the Jewish crowd came the Rothschilds!
Sorry to burst you bubble but
Masonic connection is a fable
Such is the fable of the Cromwellian origin of Freemasonry, which we owe entirely to the inventive genius of the Abbe Larudan. And, yet, it is not wholly a story of the imagination, but is really founded on an extraordinary distortion of the facts of history. https://www.universalfreemasonry.org/en/history-freemasonry/oliver-cromwell
Please provide your evidence that Cromwell was paid off to allow the Jews back in late 17th Century.
Mayer Rothschild - founder of the Rothschild bank 1744-1812 certainly didn't arrive with the mid 17th Century return, indeed was not born until 100 years after Cromwell's death, indeed he didn't even emerge onto the scene until mid 18th century in Frankfurt. Rothschild bank was not founded until 1812.
I’m not going to believe what the freemasons say. They aren’t a trustworthy source
http://www.whale.to/b/sp/blood.html#Oliver%20Cromwell
http://www.whale.to/b/sp/blood.html#ALLIES_
Fritz springmeier talks about it in his research on the bloodlines of the Illuminati
http://www.whale.to/b/sp/blood.html
The British monarchy reigns. It does not rule. Big difference.
These are not ordinary times, especially if governments collapse.
If she's out it's because (((they))) want her out. Nothing happens unless it comes from the higher ups.
That sounded like Muslim calls to prayer being played over a loudspeaker in the background!?! Oh how far England has fallen.
Happens all the time, protesters of one sort of another in Whitehall with a bull horn.
45 days...
Yesterday in the UK 'She can't recover from this': Cabinet ally of Liz Truss says her situation 'is terminal' with 1922 Committee set to meet TODAY after day of Westminster chaos that saw Home Secretary quit and No10 forced to deny Chief Whip and her Deputy had resigned https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11334463/Cabinet-ally-Liz-Truss-says-situation-terminal-1922-Committee-meet-TODAY.html
In pre-fashion show speech a few weeks ago, Kanye decided to throw in a line that the situation was unmanageable, and I don't think he was talking about the show.
From Kanye West recent "Last Week" upload. "This is a different level of nuclear activity that no one will recover from," Kanye adds. "The guy from [redacted] couldn't sell enough companies to cure this level of global warming that you're going to experience."
I wrote earlier this was a possibility. I wrote the following:
Truss is a placeholder in the UK's unfolding tyranny. There are 5 stages of a Tyranny and its psychological effects on the general public. I'll mention the first 3 stages because this is what the UK is dealing with right now. In an unfolding tyranny the population always finds itself initially in a state of Disbelief. As the tyranny unfolds, Anger is the next reaction the public experiences. As it quickly grows, this is the point to which the regime is most vulnerable and it needs to act to quell the growing anger. This is also the point to which the population has the best chance of overthrowing the regime and thereby ending it. The preferred method of the regime is to trick the populace in believing things have changed and the tyranny is coming to an end. This is favored over using force because doing so may ignite and only fan the flames of anger and protest/rebellion. It is the Bargain/offer stage most prevalently used by the tyrannical regime. It is older than time immemorial itself and has been used again and again throughout history. The Bargain/offer is made between the public and the ruling regime. Sometimes a deal is made with the betrayal of an opposing leader or/and others.
The 'change for the better' is a preferred method for accomplishing this. Look at NY Governor Andrew Cuomo and how he was decapitated. At first he was venerated, then he became over-exposed and tarnished by scandal. The MSM then suddenly turned on him. The regime promised him an easy out if he agreed to fall on his sword. His resignation came with dismissal of all charges. Who replaced him? Another tyrant in Kathy Hochul. She is even more hated than Cuomo was. Look at the UK, they did the same thing with Boris Johnson as they did with Cuomo. Who replaced Johnson? Johnson's hand picked Liz Trust. In Australia the same thing happened. I believe Liz Trust is a place holder for someone else, who will not only follow the democidal policies of Johnson, but will be far more ruthless in doing so.
She gets a 20% severance payout (£19k), returns to her £84k MP job (plus expenses) AND gets an allowance of £115k a year for life Not bad for 44 days in a job.
Perhaps the real dismantling of the deep state starts with the UK. We know that City of London is a Power House. Now with the Queen Mum gone and Parliament is shaken to the ground...
... when the obelisk in the [ city of london ] is destroyed and permently removed, you will then know
Anyone would think that the people have to be shown ...
It is really really interesting. In my experience of all this, I am finding people are more aware. To have a Prime Minister in for 6 weeks is really shocking. To see the Conservative Party turn on each other like this is so obvious to anyone. A pit of snakes serving their own interests, very clear to see.
Liz Truss has been in politics for a long time, they know she is crap at engaging people and being a PM but they still let her run??? Why??? There is no better unifying candidate??? Steve Baker or Iain Duncan Smith would have been way better.
It is making people be more reflective around me, asking themselves do we matter? Who is in charge? Dare I say it they are seeing string pullers being in charge?
It is being reported that there is the Klaus /IMF candidate or Boris in the running. It is showing there is no one representing the average person.
In a time of extreme distress to people with cost of living, heat or eat type thing, I would say that the vast majority in people in the UK view that they have been disenfranchised with no one representing them.
How will the DS spin this I wonder??? Its a complete shite show, lots of people saying its a globalist coup. I have never heard the word GLOBALIST used so much as I have in the last two weeks.
Lovely!!!!
https://twitter.com/Steven_Swinford/status/1583091554574831617
There is so much going on that I have trouble keeping track, which is what many want, I am sure. Boris went to Ukraine to insist that there be no peace talks, and that Ukraine should push valiantly ahead. As he stepped down, he seemed to already want everyone to know he would be back. So he goes there, on some "there can be no peace here" attitude and now wants to step back into the role he left? How does that happen? Stupid question, I know, since these people threw rules out long ago..
There is gonna be a lot of this sort of thing, because things will be so screwed up and they won’t have money to do anything about it, or pay government people to do their jobs. The pressures will be great.
The greatest reset. MAGA on a global scale
Globohomo , meet globohomo
Boris, having f'kd off, can stay f'kd off. He's a globalist; he's a son of another globalist who is on record advocating a max UK population of 15 million - 20 million tops (currently ~68 million).
If all the Johnsons would like to go first that would be fine.
Maybe the WHs would like to interview BoJo for his alleged participation in the extension of surveillance of DJT's campaign, etc.
In other news ... the biosphere is on a starvation diet because of historically low levels of atmospheric CO2. New York was once under a mile of ice, yet, that retreated northwards despite there being no people, industry, planes/trains/automobiles/ships, BBQs or effing patio heaters. How queer.
This will now be, what, the fifth new prime minister without the people of the UK getting to vote on it? Maybe only letting one party vote for the leader is a bad idea?
Not exactly sure how he just "steps back in" with out some sort of election?