U.S Government Admits 5G Causes COVID-19 (Peer Reviewed Doc)
(www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov)
Comments (76)
sorted by:
Causes? Probably IS it.
I always found it strange how there was this massive build up by media, corporations and government around the 'revolution' of 5G in the run up to 2020, then after the Plandemic hit, the hype promptly stopped.
I found the rush to 5G to be very odd. It doesn't provide much of an upgrade to 4G while requiring a whack ton of infrastructure upgrades and more expensive phone hardware for a small decrease in latency and slightly higher bandwidth in the real world. 4G's latency was already on par with cable modem internet speeds. The upgrade to 4G from 3G made sense. 4G is dramatically better than 3G but this insane push for 5G on all the things is highly suspicious. Especially since 5G is a microwave weapon.
https://www.rfsafe.com/5g-network-uses-nearly-same-frequency-as-weaponized-crowd-control-systems/
At the time I just assumed it was Corporatism. The "TIC", "Telecom Industrial Complex" (just made that up).
Now I wonder if there was a much more sinister aspect to this.
Also, Trump banned the Huawei 5G stuff. I wonder if that stuff is worse than the stuff from others.
Also-also, it appears that there are two forms of 5G, and that the one transmitting at higher frequency is not widely deployed. Perhaps the higher frequency one is more dangerous.
Life has become quite complicated. Everyone needs to be a Doctor-Lawyer-Engineer-Diplomat. It's hard to keep up with all of this, and our institutions have failed us because they are Captured and Corrupt.
EDIT: I realize I glossed over this because perhaps I am too close to it. For those who do not know, Huawei is the CCP's Red Army pretending to be a capitalist corporation. Letting Huawei into your nation or your life means you are having the Red Army over for dinner.
They were created Corrupt, they were never "captured." This has been going on for a very long time.
Fair point. But at this point they don't even care about hiding it.
There may be some of that. It may even be intentional, and some of the information is being purposefully put out to cause distrust in the system. You can't have systemic collapse without the creation of distrust, and systemic collapse appears to be The Plan (for both sides, assuming there are in fact two sides to this war).
Having said that, my investigation has led me to exactly these same types of disclosures on all sorts of crazy things in the past. By my estimation it hasn't really changed all that much. What has changed is how many people see the reports. It may be that the only change that has occurred is a lack of trust in MSM, coupled with a larger freedom of the communication channels (less censorship). This has created a change in the ways we communicate, thus more people see things and more people remember (less memory hole if you aren't relying on MSM to remind you).
Yes. And in the back of my mind I always remember that it was a common tactic of the KGB to back both sides in any argument, because the fundamental goal was destruction of the system, not that any one side would win. Because the goal was total chaos, where they could then use their Leninist tactics to take over and create their tyranny.
But I'm sure nobody it doing that to us now. He said sarcastically.
Damn good point about life’s increasing complexity and pressure/need to keep up
I also forgot Farmer, Mathematician, Software Expert.... I am sure I can think of others. Heck, in order to do your taxes you need to be a CPA at this point, and also part wizard/seer.
My 5G connection (one of the actual true 5G connections) brings me ~200 Mbps, whereas my 4G can go from either the shitter to ~80 Mbps.
At around 100% greater speeds, that's not anything less than substantial.
Gigabit has been floating in the consumer market for years and is fairly cheap now. Neither 4G nor 5G come anywhere close to that, and consumers can get up to around 5 gigabits per second over their FTTN connection.
What number is greater, to you?
180 Mbps, which is what my speed tests just averaged, or ~4800 Mbps?
It's not even in the realm of modern speed, and if you are lucky enough to have a FTTP connection I'm pretty sure the latency itself can't come close, relatively speaking.
You could argue that sure, maybe you don't need speeds like that on your phone, but any gain in latency makes audio calls slightly better as calls are essentially all VoIP anyway now.
Then you could argue that it doesn't require that much infrastructure, but I would argue that the modernization of infrastructure is not only important for safety reasons but also so that the world doesn't look like 7 mile in Detroit.
Personally, when my phone is hitting 5G towers it's a much better experience. Since most towers are still 4G, that good experience can disappear.
I'd prefer they focus on greater coverage though as that is much more important.
I will be curious to see how studies on this go, however, because setting speeds and latencies aside I would be interested to see if they did a Pfizer after all and skip good testing / purposefully is in the market of killing us and proving the tinfoil hats correctly.
The fact remains that we are surrounded by EMF and those frequencies effect biological systems. We are beings of frequency at a very core level. Disruption to our natural frequencies and those of the biological systems around us, including the earth, can and do have deleterious effects. There has been NO safety testing on a meaningful scale for any of this technology. Always, the tech outpaces the ethics and the safety concerns. Their excuse is always, if we're not first, someone else will be and we must be first - damn the torpedoes. The head of all this on the Federal level basically stated, damn the safety, we need this. They don't care because it is about the money. Always, follow the money.
To answer your last statement, yes, they know there is evidence that all this causes harm. But like what Pfizer is doing, they demonize anyone that tries to do research in this area, they attempt to bury the studies, they do not fund research, they provide their own industry backed bogus studies to cancel out real science (the devil is always in the details of the studies when viewed with a critical eye), and they have carefully lobbied to craft parameters for acceptable safety levels that are ridiculous. I really don't think that the 2.4ghz itself is a problem - it more a question of quantity and intensity. We are awash in these frequencies on a daily basis - and that is not healthy for biological systems in the long term.
The rollout of all this EMF tech has drastically affected me as I am one of those unfortunate few that may be the canary in the coal mine. I have had to make changes in my life to mitigate the insult - and it has not been cheap. When I first bought my home there were hardly any router signals - now on any given moment I can detect at least 40, and of those, at least 10-15 are strong signals. That doesn't even include all the other frequencies that have been ratcheted up. There are business establishments I cannot even enter without becoming very ill. What and where it is coming from, I don't know. Is it Wi-Fi or the LED lighting? I am not sure. This bombardment has gotten to the point that I can hear it - and it is not tinnitus. At times it is deafening. I have to travel out to the middle of nowhere to get away from it and have a break - and I have done this just as a test. It is difficult because, just like those that have been vaxxine injured, people like myself are dismissed and told its all in our heads. Take a pill and chill. Sounds to me like they continue to use the same playbook when they cause harm to the people.
As in each of the "g" conversions, 5g is 4g almost everywhere but downtown cores. The 'real' 5g is short distance and not that useful outside of urban areas because of the extra hardware. The 'long distance' 5g is just 4g with tricks like aggregating multiple channels and other things allowing better speeds.
Peoples phones got a software update that made the little icon say "5g" when using their old 4g phones and then people started going "Oh, im so sick. It must be tha beamz"
The "insane push" for 5g was a government sponsored media blitz. The new thing (covid) hit and thats what got the money for media. Now its electric cars and global warming.
As for the frequency parity with crowd control systems - why is that scary? The 2.4ghz used in wifi is the frquency that boils water - and yet no one has yet cooked noodles by wifi transmitter.
Its like saying the earth is ice and rock, like asteroids, therefore we should eliminate earth because an asteroid killed the dinosaurs.
WiFi routers (transmitter) transmit at 1 watt or less max power. Microwave ovens typically output 1,000 or more Watts. No wonder one can boil water and the other doesn’t. I also am concerned with WiFi as well though. European thresholds for max power are less than North American. There are European countries/cities that have outlawed WiFi use in schools, while we gleefully implement/expose our children in North America. The concerns for lower transmit powers (or elimination) are valid.
Evidence is suggesting the shorter wave length (mm) transmissions maybe more detrimental to health than typical cell phone pre 5G frequencies (800/900 MHz, 1.8/1.9 GHz). Even though the signal strength exposure of satellite transmissions received on earth is low (mW/cm2), I am concerned with the 18GHz Starlink 5G transmissions that are pretty much pervasive everywhere we go outside the house. It has been suggested the 18GHz frequency may be used to trigger activation of disease that has been latently placed into the Covid vaccines. Maybe a crazy thought, but there are things I thought were crazy 20 years ago, that are now possible. (VoIP was one).
While most people seem more concerned about base station transmitters, we should not forget about the mobile device (phone). It is only .6 Watt max power, but we wear these on our bodies for hours and hours every day. RF exposure concern is very much a function of time (hours exposed), not purely a function of frequency or signal strength. The mobile while not in call, transmits information for mobility management, location updates, and idle mode handovers to the network. Most everyone has a 5G transmitter on their person that is continually trying to find and register on a 5G network.
Europe uses the precautionary principle. If you walk up and present terrible science that says xyz may harm someone, something, somehow - the EU will ban or at least heavily regulate it.
Going "zomg, Europe doesnt let it in schools!" Is like not drinking water because your friend heard that one chick two towns over totally died by drinking too much water.
And mobile devices transmissions are easily testable yourself by just having a second phone sitting around - even a $40 one from Amazon. Or heck, test it with your wifi base station. Put a mouse directly on top of the cell phone/ base station and put another mouse in a faraday cage.
100% correct on what you said.
From what I’ve seen these pandemics are usually around updated emf rollout. Aka. Radio and tv antennas and so on. I think there was expanded radio antennas being placed during 1918. They use the pandemic as an excuse for the sickness. RFK Jr recently talked about how cell technology is not safe and the satay studies were fraudulently done. It’s on his Twitter.
I clicked on this thread title thinking this was a babylon bee story. 5G gives us CV now??? What's next, rocks?
Is “peer reviewed” a qualifier that means anything? Is peer reviewing corrupted or using a common practice of scratch my back and I’ll scratch yours?
I want facts and science not the thumbs up or down of someone reviewer. Tag lines we should see are “science and study based document” as a qualifier not “my pal approves”. As much as we see yes and money men in the medical and science fields, how could we lend legitimacy to peer reviewed? Let’s see the work and data and not rest on just the rubber stamp of peer reviewed.
Peer reviewing is an important part of the scientific process and that's why trust is instilled into it.
The problem is that it has become very incestuous and narrow in their findings instead of welcoming criticism to their methods or conclusions.
At this point it's almost like, you pay two different people sums of money to agree with each other and then they'll agree that the finding is sound, and then it's considered "peer reviewed" while other objections are suppressed.
Good point about buddy system.
I’ve come to the conclusion that the average human being doesn’t even care about any of this because they’re too busy with trying to get the new BMW series. Humans get what they deserve.
I don't disagree with you completely, but you are a bit callous. The idea that the "average" human is pursuing a BMW is laughable. The vast, vast, vast majority are consumed trying to keep their head above water, make rent/mortgage payments and keep food on the table. It really isn't their fault they aren't paying attention to this, and that is by design. Nobody deserves this. We are all victims, and we need to start showing more compassion to those less fortunate, that haven't the advantages, head start or just plain luck that we are fortunate enough to enjoy. There may be a few BMW worshipers out there, but they are a tiny minority.
Exactly. Nobody's trying to get a BMW. Da fuck lol
^^^
Not where I live.
Lucky you
You have no idea.
you are 100 percent correct. I almost envy those people for now. If everything is gong to be set right there has to be much more pain. when those that only think about their starbucks feel the pain then we will be on our way.
It is by design. The masses are either chasing the comforts they feel they've earned or are too busy trying to survive. Leaving us trying to convince the rest it's time to pay attention.
I am getting tired of trying to show the morons what is really going on.
Still quite a few sleepers out there
Some of us care, and no, even if I can get a BMW, not doing it. The dogs will make it dirty.
Ookla has a map of 5G deployments. I don't know how accurate it is. But it would be interesting to correlate this to the severity of outbreaks in geographic areas:
https://www.speedtest.net/ookla-5g-map
That would be a good one for a journalist to dig.
Ookla should be accurate on this front and it is surprising how many I have near me and yet I still have shit coverage sometimes.
Extremely inaccurate. I work in telecom and I can assure you there a far more than 2 in Manhattan. More like 2k.
Cellmapper is probably better, but I know a carrier like T-Mobile has more fanboys that map than a carrier like AT&T.
I wonder how many people realize most 5G is in the band TV used to occupy?
614 to 890 MHz? Can 5G data throughput speed be achieved in these frequencies or is calling this frequency 5G implementation more marketing speak? I thought the throughput desired for 5G would require using the higher frequencies (US 28GHz and up)? Maybe they are using alot of bandwidth by combining channels at 800 MHz, but this seems inefficient?
No clue. I am just a brain dead.
GAW has been all over 5G since as far back as we can search...2 years+.
https://greatawakening.win/search?sort=new¶ms=5G&page=11&community=GreatAwakening
Oh wow. Thanks for the info.
searchoat.co......
I feel like most 5G is basically just upgraded 4g, especially low and mid-band 5g, at the same bandwidths and frequency 5G is only about 20% faster, but the 5g standard allows for higher bandwidths so that's why the speeds can be significantly faster on the same frequency. In my opinion, if this 5G is unsafe then 4G LTE is dangerous as well since it's similar to 5G, but I don't think there has been sufficient long-term studies to really know whether these are safe or dangerous.
With even less evidence for safety is mmWave. About 20-30 times the frequency of regular 5G, this stuff can't even make it through windows because the stuff has such a high frequency. There is literally no benefits to it other than maybe at a stadium that faces heavy congestion. I honestly don't know how mmWave is legal.
I wouldn't know. Thanks for the info though.
Ploy to dismiss lab created Covid and blame 5G?
I believe there is a virus, but it's a mild flu. Then hit it with 5G and it becomes deadly.
I wonder if having a 5G tower literally across the street from my home has any correlation to me getting Rona 4 times now. I have had every fucking variant; so sick of it.
I have not been sick and I am in relatively close proximity to the visible towers. Reminder that a lot of infrastructure is also hidden in plain sight, inside trees, buildings, etc.
I think there's got to be more to the picture; some people must be more genetically "vulnerable" than others; blood type, genetic markers, etc...
Also density
Oh.
I know in the NW, when they were ready to put in those high tension tower into neighborhood, great resistance even with free electricity offered.
This theory was floated everywhere at the beginning of the "pandemic" and one of the most censored topics online and all over social media... that alone speaks to its veracity. There's a video of a professor? talking about how every time a new RF technology rolls out we have another virus scare (think spanish flu). If I can find the link, I'll post it here.
EDIT: Found the video! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ovIwgeKUoag&ab_channel=EducatedTraveler
Pretty sure David Icke had a video about this. According to his video, all the pictures of the round, spiky, so-called "virus" actually depict something different- allegedly produced by your own body, and called "lysosomes", an element of your own immune system fighting disease.
Please do. So the technology causes the virus. How interesting.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ovIwgeKUoag&ab_channel=EducatedTraveler
wow. Thanks for the info.
Interesting Thank you for sharing
I wish it is untrue. Sad.
I feel ya. The mix of information that that has been coming out lately has been really dark.. Let's hope its the darkness coming to light
The darkness is deeper than I can believe, but I think we will soon come out of the dark tunnel.
Stay Cozy
Amen. Thanks.
This paper says 5g causes same effects as covid... and insists the virus and 5g are two different things. The truth is there has never been a virus.
There is a virus, but it is not Covid. It's probably the flu.
In other words
The zany tinfoil-hat conspiracy theorists were RIGHT YET AGAIN WITH ANOTHER ACCURATE THEORY ABOUT A REAL, GENUINE CONSPIRACY
I didn't want to believe it either; just like I didn't want to believe the alien matter in the blood after the vaccine.
Truly the conspiracy theorists are the smart ones.
WEF already talking about 6G too.
WEF needs to all go *f themselves and die.
Well...that's natural. Even from a standpoint of just technological progress, you are always looking forward to the next steps.
Q: So what new improvements have we made on this new upgrade?
A: We put a 6 on the box.
if you actually go and listen to the WEF, they talk a lot about connecting people to the internet and how eventually we won't have phones because it will all just be inside you.
When I worked at Google I came across some internal documents that talked about exactly this. It was called something along the lines of "intrabody neural network". While 3 of the documents were above my access privileges 2 of them that I did have access privileges talked about successful development of a intrabody neural network that Google did in partnership with the Japanese government. Talked about satellite connection capabilities as well.
Where is that amateur radio fucktard now?
Definitely not me. I don't know anything. Just think it is INTERESTING.