Proof Beyond A Reasonable Doubt
During and after the Q-posting part of the Q operation, the Q proofs were a critical tool for verifying and confirming the veracity of the Q operation and its connections with Q+ in particular. That was a clear and specific purpose. Moreover, the proofs were clear, concise and pretty obvious (imo). They served their purpose at that time by providing evidence for anyone asking: "hey, is this really legit?"
Part of the proofs were deltas - the time or period between point A and point B, such as the delta between a particular Q drop and some other event, such as POTUS making post on Twitter, etc. Especially, zero deltas or 1-minute deltas between A) when Q would post a drop and then B) POTUS would send out a particular tweet - these became important statistical evidence highlighting the legitimacy of Q and the cooperation with Potus.
These became "proofs" because they were evidence that statistically "proved" the validity of Q.
Other proofs became significant because they pointed to correlations that potentially shed light on to what the Q operation was talking about. In those cases, also, the purposes have been clear: to reveal some coherent theory or explanation of what the Plan is and or how it is unfolding. After all, some of the techniques that Q trained anons in were about taking various data points, digging deeper and then putting the pieces of the puzzle together to increase understanding or insight.
The original Q proofs had very clear and effective purposes. They were fact based, evidence based, and the context in which they arose lent confirmation to their validity.
However, today, three and a half years on from when Q halted posting (technically 1.6 years, but the main body of 3+ years of posting finished in Dec 2020), some anons, in developing their ideas about what is happening in the info war and psywar, have resorted to paying a lot of attention to "deltas" and to drawing correlations and even conclusions from those correlations, and then labelling them as proofs.
The question is, do (all) these correlations stack up as proofs? Are they evidence of something and if so, of what?
Does The Proof Go Poof?
Why are these questions important? Why is it important to examine HOW we deal with the information, and to check whether it is fact-based, evidence-based, logic-based, reason-based, emotion-based, belief-based, or bias-based, etc?
Because Q trained anons in a variety of techniques. Those techniques became powerful tools for making our way through the information war landscape, for discerning when narratives and propaganda were at work, for avoiding or mitigating the impacts of that propaganda on ourselves, and for verifying the reality behind the facade of propaganda.
But when we depart from those techniques, it is easy to slip into habits and perspectives that become vulnerable to more subtle attacks of disinformation, misinformation and mal-information. And, there is no question that the Cabal and their instruments would want to attack and undermine the truth movement, and the anons, and all the participants of the Great Awakening, and to hamper as much as possible the QUALITY of the ongoing awakening process.
We see plenty of examples of this in the snake oil (snake venom?) salesmen and clickbait merchants who have latched on to and taken great advantage of the burgeoning audience for new information and truth. People are hungry for truth, but also hungry for hope, for a sense of security, in a world that is increasingly chaotic and confusing, and in a war where even the most seasoned anons can be buffeted by black pills and exhausted by way of attrition.
The only real check we have against THAT form of attack, which seek to exploit potential vulnerabilities that anons, awakened people and searchers may have, is to apply the techniques of critical thinking, self-reflection, bias-checking and solid, hard-nosed evidence based research that Q inspired us to pursue.
"Question everything" is an important guideline in many, many cases, and THAT includes questioning our own attitudes, approaches, methods and thinking. We cannot afford to slip into patterns of believing things because they make us feel good, because they provide some false but comforting sensation ("hopium"), or because they alleviate some sense of anxiety or concern or need for a sense of security in our interpretation of things.
What's the old adage about sacrificing liberty for security? (Thank you Ben Franklin )
We can translate that adage into something about sacrificing tough, critical thinking for comfort (eke mental security).
So, we need to check ourselves.
And this leads to another question: as the movement has developed in the absence of Q posting, have we drifted from our original angle and methods? Are we on course in terms of HOW we practice our craft? Or if we have drifted off course, how?
Some might be inspired to immediately dismiss these questions. "Pooh, pooh!" They will declare. "We are anons! We don't make mistakes? We are invulnerable to the normal human foibles that drag ALL people into comfort zones unless they practice vigilance and harsh self-scrutiny!!! We are all about insight and seeing through the fog!!!! We have no blind spots at all!!!"
Hmmm….
The Proof Of The Pudding
The inspiration for this post is the now current (Sticky at time of drafting) posting that is titled:
6 YEAR Q PROOF. To the exact day. Do you believe in coincidences?
I could point out how the Subject Title is merely a COPY/PASTE of the tweet that the OP is inspired to share with the board, and that there is sadly no level of analysis, or even hint of WHO stated this. That last part if unfortunate, in my opinion, because I am FAR more likely to give some credence to a post by a GAW member who has drawn their own conclusions than to some anon on the X who is NOT on GAW. Essentially, the OP merely offers the X post as its own headline. But let's put that aside.
Here's the post: https://greatawakening.win/p/17siXJK6yd/6-year-q-proof-to-the-exact-day-/c/
And here is the Tweet that the post is reproducing: https://twitter.com/EDranir/status/1775591029766262886
For me, however, the first question that arises is:
if this is a "Q proof" what is the purpose of the proof? What does it reveal?
Is it simply a proof that "the Pan is still operational and things are going our way"? Is it a proof that "Q definitely has Operation Looking Glass and the Q drops are predictions and records of future events that Q knew WOULD happen 5 years, 6 years earlier?" Or what? What is it a proof of? "That there are no coincidences?"
What is the practical EFFECT of this so-called proof?
Anyway, let's turn the soil on the X post and see what comes up.
6 YEAR PROOF. To the exact day. With a date mirror. How? Do you believe in coincidences?
H/T @ELMAGAIN for finding this first.
The 'proof' draws these correlations:
-
7.4 magnitude earthquake <> Q Drop 1067 date of April 7, 2018 (7.4, 4.7)
-
Date of X post by Insider Paper April 2, 2024 <> A day of the week referenced in Q drop 1120 - Tuesday and Q drop 1067 Tuesday (April 2, 2024 = Tuesday, Q drops both reference "Tuesday")
-
Name of road on street sign "Chongqing Rd" with name in Q drop 1120 and in Q drop 1067 (chongqing, chongqing, chongqing)
-
Date of Q drop 995 April 3, 2018 that includes content "Future Proves Past. Several today" + [1 day] * [A]pril. MOAB
The stated conclusion = 6 Year Proof
The Proof Of the Pudding is In The Eating
Personally, I have a few issues with this so-called Proof, none the least being thge question I have: "What does it actually prove?"
Chongqing
Chongqing was a significant data point during the drops drops 1067, 1120, 2516. I recall there being photos of, and allusion to activities of, specific persons in that city at that time. But it is also in other drops: 2517, 2516, posted in November 2018.
Q 1118 references chongqing indirectly, as an anon references the article Q linked in Q 1117, about China embracing foreign cars.
Q 1117 references Q 1116, in which Q writes: "Thank you Xi. Good Start. China/CQ cancel."
In this series of Q drops, Q talks about Chongqing, about cars, about imports, about Xi, and China.
10767, "China Chongqing Tuesday" This post was on Saturday April 7, 2018. The next Tuesday was April 10, when X gave a significant speech
http://www.xinhuanet.com/english/2018-04/10/c_137099839.htm
One highlight was increasing imports and lowering tarrifs for vehicles.
Chinese President Xi Jinping said Tuesday China will significantly lower the import tariffs for vehicles and reduce import tariffs for some other products this year.
Does it make sense that the Q drops were about Xi, POTUS's ongoing successful engagements with China, re: changing the trade dynamic (a BIG feature of the Trump administration #1)? Yes. That Xi's speech on April 10 indicated a "start"? Yes.
So what kind of connection might it have with an earthquake in April this year?
The photo presented in the X tweet in the OP is Chongqing rd, in the district of Hualien City in Taiwan.
But the Chingqing referenced in the Q drops appears to be the Chongqing district (Chongqing City) in China (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chongqing).
We can see some correlation between the photo here (on X) and the Q drops 1067 and 1120. That's because it's the same name. But just like in cities and countries all over the world, places in two different nations can share the same name. (Compare "Birmingham" (city) in the UK with "Birmingham Rd" elsewhere).
So is there a real connection here? In both Q1067 and Q 2516, Q specifically references China and the city of Chongqing in China (mainland). Not Taiwan.
Dates
The 'proof' here cites a correlation between the X post by "Insider Paper" (aka date April 2, 2024) and post 1067, but the actual earthquake event happened in Taiwan on April 3. It only appears as April 2 because the person using the X account is on the other side of the date line from Taiwan. The earthquake in question happened on April 3.
https://apnews.com/article/taiwan-earthquake-explainer-hualien-8c3de7d63c964ae460424aa7e52581a2
TAIPEI, Taiwan (AP) — Taiwan was struck Wednesday by its most powerful earthquake in a quarter of a century. At least nine people were killed and hundreds injured, buildings and highways damaged and dozens of workers at quarries stranded.
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2024/apr/3/strongest-earthquake-25-years-kills-nine-injures-o/
Nine people are dead and more than 1,000 reported injured in Taiwan after the island nation was rocked by the strongest earthquake in a quarter-century Wednesday.
For someone using X in a different location, the date is April 3
So the connection between "Tuesday" and the chongqing rd photo aka Hualien City Earthquake, which happened on Wednesday, and posted by Insider Paper, is a false positive.
So, what is the proof?
There is no correlation between April 2 (Tuesday) and the Huelin city earthquake April 3 (Wednesday). (X shows date of viewer, not of actual incident)
There is no correlation between Chongqing in the Q drops and the road in Hualien Taiwan except that they share the same name. There is also a road of that name in Taipei, and possibly elsewhere.
"chongqing is a romanization of the Chinese word 重庆 (Simplified Chinese) aka 重慶 Traditional Chinese meaning literally "Double Celebration".
Is there a correlation between an earthquake of 7.4 on the Richter scale and a q drop posted on April 4, 2018? A numerical correlation, but is it meaningful?
Is there a correlation between Drop 995 with "future proves past, several today" "1 day" and "[A]pril MOAB." and the city and country of Hualien in Eastern Taiwan where the earthquake happened? Actually, both events (the drop and the earthquake) took place on the same day, BUT 995 does not reference Taiwan, Chongqing or China in any way. So is there are connection? If so, is it strong? Weak?
Also, the "proof" references "[1 day]" in Q995, I assume alluding to the 1 day difference between the earthquake in Eastern Taiwan and the drop itself Q995. But that's a false positive, because the earthquake did NOT take place on April 2, but April 3, Taiwan time.
To me, the correlations are tenuous at best. But the real kicker is this: What on earth does this 'proof' prove?
There is PLENTY of context in the Q drops themselves that give the actual drops significance : the relation between CCP China and the US, between POTUS and XI, between the trade imbalance that the globalists had been using to destroy America and which Trump reversed in cooperation with Xi. "Thank you Xi. Good Start".
If this is a Q proof, what does it prove? Does it prove that Q KNEW there would be an earthquake on April 3, 2024? How? The connection between drop 995 and the Hualien earthquake is tenuous at the very best. And the content of the Q drop could reasonably be stretched out to connect with dozens if not hundreds of other events over the years.
Does it prove that Q or Q operatives made the earthquake? In order to prove what? Only to prove the Q operation? Why would an earthquake be triggered in Taiwan? To disrupt the Semi-conductor industry? To spark a CCP Chinese invasion?
It's valid that anons try to draw connections, but those connections need to be tested and then critically reviewed, and pushed and pulled and tested again. They need to have some rational or reasonable purpose. Otherwise, we just become that guy. Drawing connections and getting excited, but less than careful about applying the very skills and techniques that Q trained and inspired us in.
And if we allow ourselves to be moved along by being less than self-critical, we do a disservice to our mission and increase the potential for bad actors to inject disinformation and misinformation into the truth sphere. To me, this is the real threat. We have learned to see through many of the enemy's lies, but have we learned to critique ourselves? For me, that a question.
Just Human talks about this danger in the recent episode of Defected. Worth a listen, for about 10, minutes. The link is time-stamped up, if you are interested.
https://rumble.com/v4ml6ok-defected-ep.-65-900-pm-et-.html?start=6686 (1:51:26)
Of especial note is what he says at 1:55:20.
Nailed it. This is they way frens. Question EVERYthing, ESPECIALLY your own biases and complacency. WE have to hold ourselves to a higher standard bc our enemies WILL hold us accountable and use it to hurt the movement as a whole. Stay vigilant out there!
I think the most overused, the least understood and one of the biggest vulnerabilities enabling the injection of psyop mis-, dis- and mal- information, is the phrase "double meanings exist".
Your critique of this proof is exposing exactly how they use it with the Chongqing reference and connection.
I dont get excited when I see these "proofs". I see them as curiosities only with loose connections and little gravitas.
Add to that "mirrors and disinformation is necessary" and it is all very open to interpretation...
100%.
Amen.
Yeah, current “proofs” seem like they might better be called a nice potential evidence of an action possibly being involved with the operation. May I suggest the term, “Possible Qction?”?
To me, the biggest current signatories of action are 13/17s in significant prominence of different comms, and the biggest proofs were tippytop and Trump tweets with subject matter at linked deltas after q-posts while active.
The point of “proofs” was to prove that Q was legit, not to prove that events are tied to operational execution. What are the thoughts on the suggested term?
As far as “double meanings exist” and “disinformation is necessary”, agreed. They are the “the kingdom of heaven is within” or “render unto Caesar what is Caesar’s” of Q.
I’m guilty of using, and probably misusing, most of them, but they’re definitely all misused more than properly used.
You are also more likely to find 13s and 17's because you're looking for them (frequency illusion).
And double digits starting with 1's are going to appear way more often than double digits starting with 9's (ballot analysis taught me that).
Those numbers can be interesting. Just know some of the reasons why they seem to appear a lot.
To me, zero delta posts and the chans asking Trump to say "tippy top" are way more powerful as a potential proof.
Yeah, understood, but it’s funny how many news stories run “13 people died during this very unusual fire. Investigators suspect arson, but as of this report, no suspects have been found.”
I only use them as potential markers for actions, the same way people in Illinois might suspect the Wet Bandits if their house floods while they’re away on vacation.
There is also something else at play here (in my opinion). Some folks express it like this: "The matrix is winking at us".
Things that happen which present themselves as significant, which are pointers, 'coincidences' that seem NOT like coincidences.
My own view is that a lot of this is actionized by the living spirit world (i.e. the Holy Spirit and good spirits working together to promote God's agenda on earth).
So, not something that the WH on Earth do necessarily, but evidence that God is alive, that Heaven is working. For example, I put the Matrix film in that category. The impact of the film is enormous, and yet, was it specifically designed to achieve that impact? Did the creators have that intent? Or were they simply an instrument for higher powers?
Another aspect to consider here is the symbolism and religious beliefs of the political Satanists. They infuse symbology with intent, in order to weave spells and cast energetic forces ('magic'), and use that symbology in lots of places, to 'cast spells'.
The point here is not whether the symbols are inherently good or bad (e.g. many of God's creations have a pentagram-like structure), but the fact that the Satanists infuse certain meanings with intent, and that THEY believe in it. So, the skull and crossbones (322), or the inverted pyramid, etc, these things pop up sometimes because the Satanists (and their non-Earthly spiritual forces (satanic spiritual forces) try to weave them in to events and daily consciousness in order to advance their occultist agendas.
The symbolism often include numerical elements (numbers), but not every instances of such symbols are satanically inspired. Thus, discernment needs to be applied when considering and analyzing them.
But it seems clear that Q wanted us to realize and become familiar with the fact that these occultists use these things because they believe they advance their evil agendas, which are ultimately the spiritual desecration of God's world.
Possible Qction
I love this term, and suggest it be made into a flair. it would cover such things as the proposed 'proof' here, but also anything that looks like it might be evidence of the plan unfolding and/or actions by the White Hats that interface with the Q operation and it's core themes.
u/catsfive
u/fatality
u/qanuat
Great post! Thank you for staying, and keeping us, grounded in reality.
TY. We keep each other grounded. And, the real point is, I don't mind being wrong as long as I am employing critical thinking in my method.
You are a freaking Beast my brother!! 😁 This is very well said!
Awesome post. Thank you for the defected clip too.
So many excellent nuggets in Defected. I listen to them religiously. (By which i mean, I never miss an episode, not that I'm adopting Defected as an idol!!!)
I so often listen and think, i should clip that and post it, but alas, so little time, so many things.
And, PoU, I have not forgotten my promise! Just FYI.
:-)
Simply keeping our terminology in check and refraining from using proof/delta so liberally would go a long way.
A slang term for nascent research would be helpful... I don't want people to stop posting the connections they're seeing, even if they're tenuous or oversold.
I love this comment. Both because your suggestion "keeping our terminology in check and refraining from using proof/delta so liberally" is excellent imo (moderate self-discipline in order to promote healthy practices), but also for the comment "I don't want people to stop posting the connections they're seeing, even if they're tenuous or oversold".
I love that because, I agree and I don't see anything inherently wrong with people posting the connections they are see, even if tenuous, as long as the engagement is done with critical thinking, self-analysis and good Q practices. It's when the latter is missing that we get into murky waters.
That is a stellar suggestion … nascent research. Like how we call references to provide evidence “sauce”. Lets do this merf. Great idea.
Boom.
Great work, u/FractalizingIron!
THIS needs either a permanent sticky, or a permanent reference link.
Do we have a top threads stickied post? That’d probably be the best spot for it. u/CatsFive
Edit: sorry if I shouldn’t tag mods. Will make a note if so.
I think the mods appreciate being tagged. I've never heard a complaint or objection from one. It aids communication.
Yeah, I agree.
Great post I’d like to say if you didn’t cover it I divide things in between Q proofs and Q proofs (+)*
As in one is a simple proof so simple even a normie pleb like me can follow it.
IE Q and Trump both post about a topic say covid, Q just posted a letter in brackets and says something about covid, Trump tweet is missing that exact letter and the topic is the same. DUH!
This is a classic delta Q proof. Or Q posts “watch the water!” at the exact moment Flynn would change a Twitter banner etc.
Then there’s Q proofs of today where Q isn’t exactly posting. IE Trump posts a missing letter, you go back to the date and Q posted that missing letter. DUH!
Or the time of the Q posts matches the tweet or the tweet time is the Q post. Etc.
The last variety that is most obvious to me is literally Trump posts a video where there’s a giant Q on his forehead and a screenshot of a dozen Q posts, and references to The Storm which is literally a phrase Trump and Q both coined…. DUH!
You think he is in on it or what!? Lmao
Does anyone else feel like we’re way past the time of requiring Q proofs? It’s more than obvious that Q and Trump are executing “The Plan”.
Today, I find more value in Q posts being used as a framework for what is coming around the corner.
^^^ THIS ^^^
Yes
High energy post. Well done.
Why, thank you Ed.
Well said, well thought out. Thank you for keeping this forum high quality!
I often find myself asking the same question: "What does this prove?"
The feedback I usually get is that "Q causes specific times to be reported or to happen as a way to tell anons that whitehats are still in control". For example having the Queen Elizabeth's casket lowered at a specific time. But of course with so many world events and mico world events, of course some timestamp is going to line up, right?
Good writeup.
Thank you for writing this up. Many of these proofs are really garbage. I'm pretty good picking stuff apart but often our mods are stickying crap that nobody understands.
Anywho...why has nobody been hitting up the Q clock? I remember that was all the rage for a while.
I tried fern. Only once found anything remotely compelling (from an RFK tweet).
The bottom line is if you take 100 or so random posts (which is what you end up doing when you click a clock minute), you inevitably find a few connections.
Perhaps the clock proofs require higher level understanding, but for my level of analysis they land in the "coincidence" territory rather than demonstrating intent.
I hate the Q-clock idea. I have picked it apart, and while it is interesting, the correlations are hopium. Every time I ask QClockers for assistance understanding they turn libtard with ‘reverse TDS’. Its pathetic and embarrassing and almost feels intentional to make us look stupid.
When i see some of these so called proofs ,well most really ,i say under my breath ."WELL THATS A FUCKIN STRETCH" ,and very well thought out FRACT,thanks for your two cents.but to be frank about it all,i'm waiting for PERP WALKS ,the EBS with 3 days of video's looping with the Cabal Deep State giving confessions of their Complicit Treasonous acts of wrongdoing,until then its all Conspiracy Conjecture with some sauce that covers the taste of some really bad meat.
I still firmly believe that that particular diagram indicates comms of some kind. The news is focused on this particular building on this particular street on this particular day and it's related to an Earthquake (Boom).
Something is kooky behind the scenes. You cannot deny that. The Storm is very near.
I agree, I should have not copied and pasted. I shouldn’t have put Q proof. I stand corrected and will be more careful in future. Since there are no new Q posts, we are trying to decipher current news with Q lenses, and there is a lot of speculation. Leave no stone unturned, I thought this might be a stone. I was wrong
You may be on to something. Never be down because of a failure. Q told you to research and study and verify. Isn't that what you are doing?
Well said.
u/lovecymru
Apologies if I came across as a bit harsh. That's said, I would next time encourage your to add to your title, so we know WHO is saying the assertion in the title. But also add your own thoughts and analysis.
It may have been a stone. We'd never know if we don't work the problem, aka apply our skills and mental techniques to the subject matter. For me, the really issue is not whether you or I are right or wrong, but whether we are applying critical thinking, sharing analysis, practicing discernment and self-critique, and making an effort to evaluate in reference to factual and empirical information.
Right or wrong, those skills are the real key. Because with consistent application, even when we are wrong, we learn and develop and eventually become a lot more right (accurate, correct) than we would otherwise.
Keep posting fren. At a minimum, your post became the inspiration for this one! I could not have written this post without you!!!
"leave not stone unturned" ~ A solid basis for moving forward. Updoogle.
We’re all hypothesizing and testing! + u/lovecymru
This is my take on what your referenced post is trying to do, do you think it’s accurate? (First 3 or so paragraphs)
If so, might a better term be, “Possible Qction?” I do like seeing posts like that, but also agree they should have a better slang word to describe them.
https://greatawakening.win/p/17siXKR8WH/x/c/4ZA1yHQZiAn
All your points were constructive criticism to help process and discern better. I appreciate all the effort you did. It helps me do better too.
Thanks! Glad to hear it. Gud postings, fren!
Sheesh. Get a room you two frogs.
But seriously, Keep on posting.
Thank you Storm for coming back with a contrasting perspective. The best discussions are where we bring different angles and different views and work through them to find the gold.
Not sure if this is something you consider, and if you have a view on this, I'm interested to hear it, but here goes:
"The news" - the diagram in question takes a post from "Insider Paper" which had a paper. Is the idea here that somehow Insider Paper is a WH instrument? Or that they are themselves engaged in comms, for themselves or on someone's behalf?
It's one picture and one tweet, and although I haven't run an analysis to see if this street and building are in any way significantly "news" anywhere else, I glanced through a lot of reports and articles regarding the earthquake and this particular building and street do not pop out.
But again I would ask (because I cannot see it myself): what would be the purpose of this "comms"? aka WHY?
We humans are meaning making creatures. We generate meaning by creating relationships and creating connections out of the vast pool of potential connections. (This meaning creation aspects is intimately tied to our ability to create and use language, for example).
Se we can and often do draw connections and generate meaning by investing meaning in them. We do this all the time. E.g "the girl at the back of the class gave me a note. This "means" she has a crush on me!!!"
But it might not mean that, or it might. Further evidence required.
We CREATE meaning by creating connections. But the question is, is that meaning accurate, correlative to reality? Or is it just something we ourselves subjectively created?
I'm glad we could discuss this, and appreciate you bringing your perspective despite or perhaps because it contradicts with my own (although i did not outright state it). But I do not see comms by Q team here. I don't see what the purpose would be, the means of doing that.
I see the signs of the storm all around us. In fact, in my view, the "storm" actually hit in November 2020, and we've been living in the midst of the storm since then. But I don't see comms like this as anything that makes me think about the storm in any way. The signs are everywhere, just not as comms.
(If DJT plays "WWG1WGA" at the end of his rally, is this "comms"? I guess so. Sort of. But is "Hey, you're awesome!" also comms? I guess so. I think "comms' as brought into focus by Q are different. They have a specific purpose, specific audience. The are about communicating something, not just about 'vibes'.)
Anyway, that's a bunch about what I think, but I'm quite interested to hear any elaboration of your own perspective.
This might legit be the single most important post to this forum ever. EVER.
I am going to comment on something that is going to draw fire, it always does, but I am baffled by the obsession some people have with the “Q-Clock”. I am what would be considered ‘highly educated’. In ops research, which is math and stats intensive. No one knows more than I that Q is real. It is impossible for it to not be. THAT BEING SAID … the non-sensical soft and squishy rules that QClockers use to draw CORRELATIONS and label them PROOFS in an effort to create a ‘clock’ that connects happenings and Q posts. Whats more, anytime I make a sincere effort to understand by asking questions the hard core Q-Clockers turn into libtard like toddlers, leveling insults and offering ZERO explaination other that “firgure it out yourself”, or “do your own research”.
Sorry for the long comment.
Seriously … amazing post.
kekekekekekeek
Thank you Farpoint, but I assure you, it is NOT the most important post to this forum. Nor will it ever be!
But maybe it's the most important for you, now. If that's the case, then praise the Father. Carry on, anon.
Great post. It is a dangerous situation where people believe something to be a Q proof only if presented in this format, circles and arrows connecting arbitrary numbers or figures to nearly unrelated Q drops, even if it is not a Q proof at all just like you broke this one down.
At this point, and I am sure you have all experienced this, you are reading an article or a newsbreak and it hits you, that is a future proves past or 17s show up where they shouldn't..it proves to you Q is real
But you can't share it per say, because there is no way to post it in a picture that looks like a football play drawn over a tweet and some Q drops.
The original Q proofs are there to convince the unconvinced...Q proofs going forward? You as an anon will experience those personally but there is often little ways to sensationalize it because it is something that just comes with being awake.
Important point. Sometimes the realizations are just for us, and sometimes, even, they are not something that can be articulated. It just comes with being awake.
We said, ax.
When one is on the bus at times we show our humanity and fall asleep during the ride. Maybe at times we listening to headphones and only see parts of stuff thru others in the bus smoking or just in the way. We know the bus is moving from the sense of gravity swaying and glimpses of the window.
At time we get motion sick and need a paper bag. We hear those around us with some ruckus in the back of the bus but we know the driver is in the front and is (hopefully) awake and knows where the Z end of the ride goes.
It is only when we get off of the bus and find ourselves in the desert with no water or direction.
I am thankful to be on the bus and patiently waiting until the inevitable time when we see what patience, hope, faith, love, and most importantly those who have been given the rewards of their gifts shown to us who endured.
Not everyone can be the leader nor can everyone not need a leader and a direction. While in the bus we may not know exactly the direction we are going we can tell we are moving forward and there is still gas in the engine.
QProofsBook.comQProofsBook.com
these are my favorite https://files.catbox.moe/rkuu6s.webp
Classic.
u/#silvia
Thank you so much for the write up. I know it took some time, but damn was it needed. Should become a rubric for before things get stickied!
Why, thank you litho.
I once wrote a suggestion to the mods that a rubric for stickying be developed and then put into to practice. Still think it would be a VERY good idea. Would not need to be something the mods have to do alone: the whole board could contribute in order to build a powerful rubric.
Maybe one day.
Glad it isnt just me then. I usually just accept these kind of posts with coloured lines as too autistic for my brain to process and think I must just be too dumb to understand lol
Well, me too mostly. I think a good solid description of what the creator is thinking would be helpful.