Already been done... They're not getting translated and we here don't search in other languages. Look for OrwellCity who translates La Quinta Columna. They've been tracking graphene oxide in foods and in the environment since before the plandemic, its response in blood to external radiation (like 5g), and its increased damage to blood cells in acidic systems (like athletes who produce lactic acid in high amounts and then keel over). When they could obtain vials of vaccines, they observed them and found self-assembling structures that reacted to heat, light and radiation.
The MAC address phenomenon has been reposted, which was discovered early on in in Europe. Regular people found it and very scientifically isolated themselves and diligently eliminated all possible sources of the new signals. Then mainstream apps suddenly were changed to make it harder to open-search devices from phones. But you can wait for a white coat in a lab full of devices to confirm in a peer reviewed paper.
The last claim about graphene oxide that had anymore more than people claiming “graphene oxide!!!” in was complete misdirection/false flag. It used a description of a preparation technique for electron microscopy as evidence of graphene oxide in the jabs.
As for “tracking graphene oxide in foods” i would like to know how they track it, because the means of testing aren’t the most sensitive techniques and very costly. You need multiple approaches to differentiate from other sources of carbon.
Not saying it’s not possible, but you need more than a microscope.
Yeah i can’t get on board with this yet. These are some pretty out there claims with minimal supporting evidence. There are far better techniques than optical microscopes for finding out what she’s claiming.
I am 43 career year scientist (biochemist) speaking here:
The fact is the evidence shows that you don't need rocket science to detect these kinds of things.
The science doesn't have to be difficult to be right, or to be credible.
There are plenty of "experts" with egos who will try to make things more difficult than they really are, just to puff themselves - too many are on the publish or perish treadmill, and rather than studying science and publishing from a position of objectivity, their narrative copy and conclusions are bought as sponsored.
A more difficult explanation doen't translate to more thoughtful explantion, when thought contortion is at the heart of the mental exercise made under a pretense of accomplishment.
I have no doubt there was something nefarious in that vaxx...
But one lady who doesn't even speak like a real doctor, is seeing this at only 100x?
And if things were actually making their own light, every fucking person who was vaxxed would be pricking their fingers and putting their own blood under the microscope to see a light show...
I'm calling bullshit on this. Only 100x is not very strong, and other people would have seen fuckin light shows by now too
Hi tweety, you might already have this video. I thought it might be of interest to other people also. From around 38 minutes onwards there is mention of possible treatments like nicotine and EDTA.
If, and that is a very big and skeptical if, these findings are true, it shouldn't be very difficult to remove these toxins from a person's bloodstream. Immediate thoughts go to the use of electromagnetism or electromagnetic pulse waves or similar magnetic manipulation of these particles, assuming that they are metallic and energized somehow.
Reminds me of the 2008 remake of "The Day the Earth Stood Still." This is the film from which the famous "only at the precipice" quote comes from. Another aspect of this film was nanotechnology that could disassemble and reassemble, and infiltrate a person's body. Klaatu, the alien from the film, was able to extract the nanobots from the other film protagonists in the climax of the film.
Well that's where we are. You say we're on the brink of destruction and you're right. But it's only on the brink that people find the will to change. Only at the precipice do we evolve.
THIS is the thing that would put 99 pct in the hospital. Supposedly even those of us without the vax also have this in their bodies just through others' shedding.
I finally got around to watching the Magic Eyes Qnly's series 9 Law of War, and I'm literally only 3 minutes in and it's about nanobots and how 5G can be used to activate and cause a problem right before the election (and now all the "vote early" warnings make sense). Now I must watch "The Day the Earth Stood Still." Thanks for the info.
What i cannot reconcile in my mind is why would a pharmaceutical drug such as ivermectin, be effective against nano microchips or whatever the hell it is that she is saying is in the clot shots?
It isn't. The clot shots have multiple things in them. We have learned about different supplements that help fight or clear these different things.
Ivermectin fights off the lipid wall breaking parts of the manmade bioweapon which insert spike proteins and other junk into the cells. Zinc is important as a helper here, blocking the attack sites.
Nattokinase helps take out the spike proteins, while all the supplements that support immune system front line fighters help this and other parts as well. Natto also lowers blood pressure without all the big pharma side effects, so if course they tell you not to take it if you're taking cholesterol or blood pressure meds. I know now several people who were able to get off those meds by starting a regimen of natto.
N-Acetyl Cysteine (NAC) helps the body produce glutathione, which clears toxins from the bloodstream like graphene oxide.
I don't know why anti-parasite meds like ivermectin, fenbendazole, mebendazole do so much good against so many things like cancer and bioweapons, but they do, which means that collectively the medical industry either knows next to nothing or has been hiding a heck of a lot from everyone. Or both
Cancer is uncontrolled harmful growth of our own cells. It always happens in all of us, but normal healthy systems clean it out. If enough damage is sustained by our systems, such as from radiation, malnourishment, toxins and/or parasites, we are no longer able to maintain ourselves.
Thus there are many kinds of cancer, and unless the sources of the damage to our immune systems are resolved, it will absolutely return. Radiative and chemical attacks upon us, such as "chemotherapy" will cause lasting damage and make the body more susceptible to all sorts of problems, including harder cancer.
Im not trying to argue with anybody. I've read so much i can't keep it straight anymore. I just thought i remembered a protocol to get rid of vax included IVM. These evil bastards all need put to death. That's all i know.
Based on what advanced biochemists know, no. Lots of very geeky sci-fi explored that idea. But everything on this planet seems to be, and it's not yet fully apparent why that is. It's almost as if it were specially designed by a super genius or something... Which is probably why every serious scientist in the real world that I've ever encountered is a true believer in intelligent design and usually extremely religious.
I guess you'd have to define lifeforms. Would you consider a robot with AI a lifeform? I just wonder how ivermectin would do anything to nanochips. What mechanism would make Ivermctin effective against a computer chip? Rhetorical question because I doubt any one on here can come up with that answer.
Reminds me of the videos of people claiming there were worms in the covid shots, featuring people with acting abilities worse than seen in a junior high play.
Charles Lieber - nanotech scientist - working with the chinese - the influenza strain used for the mythical COVID implanted nano tech machines into people.......(transhumanism) and the mRNA gene therapy shots that were NOT vaccines - started attacking the immune systems - and it continues until the hose dies.
That, fundamentally, is what “science” actually is - publication of findings and methodologies so that independent researchers can recreate and validate claims for themselves.
I’m sorry it came off as lecturing, and maybe it was (didn’t re-read just now, but it’s one reason I will often edit a lot of my posts after writing them) but note that I didn’t intend it that way, and was stating that from not having seen it available.
You are correct, I didn’t know of or read those things, and was commenting from the information I have, which you are also correct didn’t go into any papers or know where they are at. I didn’t see them cited here, or know where they might be.
There are a lot of things presented in the way that I stated, though, and while it can result in this reaction, justifiably, I do try and go back to the “dumb underlying requirements”, as people often miss them, myself included. Not trying to imply that anyone didn’t know them, just to be sure it isn’t missed, out of my own having not seen it.
Autistic information review and such - also I tend toward broad associative research and reasoning, and not deep, specific research, though I’ll occasionally dive to mid-deep levels.
but I do know that JFK Jr.'s prophetic February 1997 George Magazine talked about nanotechnology...it's the edition with Bill Gates & a future lung attacking virus.
I would provide the link, but Archive.org isn't working👽🤖
Self-assembling little monsters in the vials have been, for years. I've been watching South Americans and Europeans (swiss, German, Spanish) examine them. They're freaky and react to heat, light and certain frequencies of radiation. I know Russians, indians and Japanese find things in vials as well, and I recall mention of comparisons to luciferase. Just because you haven't been spoonfed info didn't mean it's not out there. This is supposed to be a research board ffs. Take a seat.
Self assembly via light is not a new concept in the world of nanotech. Think of it like a kid playing with magnets. Light is the on switch and darkness if the off switch.
Eh i expected to be downvoted tbh. I believe in nanotech dont get me wrong but self assembling robots in our blood is wild! To what end? Lots of unanswered questions right when people are truly turning to us. Its bad timing if anything.
I am hoping to see independant researchers confirm these findings.
Already been done... They're not getting translated and we here don't search in other languages. Look for OrwellCity who translates La Quinta Columna. They've been tracking graphene oxide in foods and in the environment since before the plandemic, its response in blood to external radiation (like 5g), and its increased damage to blood cells in acidic systems (like athletes who produce lactic acid in high amounts and then keel over). When they could obtain vials of vaccines, they observed them and found self-assembling structures that reacted to heat, light and radiation.
The MAC address phenomenon has been reposted, which was discovered early on in in Europe. Regular people found it and very scientifically isolated themselves and diligently eliminated all possible sources of the new signals. Then mainstream apps suddenly were changed to make it harder to open-search devices from phones. But you can wait for a white coat in a lab full of devices to confirm in a peer reviewed paper.
I tested Mac address phenomenon myself multiple times in multiple locations. Didn't find anything.
might be something with different batches? i dunno this whole damn thing could just be a distraction.
The last claim about graphene oxide that had anymore more than people claiming “graphene oxide!!!” in was complete misdirection/false flag. It used a description of a preparation technique for electron microscopy as evidence of graphene oxide in the jabs.
As for “tracking graphene oxide in foods” i would like to know how they track it, because the means of testing aren’t the most sensitive techniques and very costly. You need multiple approaches to differentiate from other sources of carbon.
Not saying it’s not possible, but you need more than a microscope.
Agreed. To insane to believe without verification
Yeah i can’t get on board with this yet. These are some pretty out there claims with minimal supporting evidence. There are far better techniques than optical microscopes for finding out what she’s claiming.
I am 43 career year scientist (biochemist) speaking here:
The fact is the evidence shows that you don't need rocket science to detect these kinds of things.
The science doesn't have to be difficult to be right, or to be credible.
There are plenty of "experts" with egos who will try to make things more difficult than they really are, just to puff themselves - too many are on the publish or perish treadmill, and rather than studying science and publishing from a position of objectivity, their narrative copy and conclusions are bought as sponsored.
A more difficult explanation doen't translate to more thoughtful explantion, when thought contortion is at the heart of the mental exercise made under a pretense of accomplishment.
I have no doubt there was something nefarious in that vaxx...
But one lady who doesn't even speak like a real doctor, is seeing this at only 100x?
And if things were actually making their own light, every fucking person who was vaxxed would be pricking their fingers and putting their own blood under the microscope to see a light show...
I'm calling bullshit on this. Only 100x is not very strong, and other people would have seen fuckin light shows by now too
That's where I am. So many claims of finding this or that in vaxxed blood. If it's common, where are the whistleblower nurses, doctors, techs?
Hi tweety, you might already have this video. I thought it might be of interest to other people also. From around 38 minutes onwards there is mention of possible treatments like nicotine and EDTA.
Red Alert: It's in our blood. Dr Ana Mihalcea.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/wn2b6T0Gfm2q
She does a great service. Cheers fren!
If, and that is a very big and skeptical if, these findings are true, it shouldn't be very difficult to remove these toxins from a person's bloodstream. Immediate thoughts go to the use of electromagnetism or electromagnetic pulse waves or similar magnetic manipulation of these particles, assuming that they are metallic and energized somehow.
Reminds me of the 2008 remake of "The Day the Earth Stood Still." This is the film from which the famous "only at the precipice" quote comes from. Another aspect of this film was nanotechnology that could disassemble and reassemble, and infiltrate a person's body. Klaatu, the alien from the film, was able to extract the nanobots from the other film protagonists in the climax of the film.
Professor Barnhardt :
THIS is the thing that would put 99 pct in the hospital. Supposedly even those of us without the vax also have this in their bodies just through others' shedding. I finally got around to watching the Magic Eyes Qnly's series 9 Law of War, and I'm literally only 3 minutes in and it's about nanobots and how 5G can be used to activate and cause a problem right before the election (and now all the "vote early" warnings make sense). Now I must watch "The Day the Earth Stood Still." Thanks for the info.
We know they have Luciferase anyway.
This is so creepy. These people are guinea pigs.
Thank God I didn't fall for this.
That's why you limit your exposure to vaxxed people
Is there a particular brand of nicotine patch that’s better than another?
Just bumbled into this…
Remember Bill Gates’ patch-based vaccine delivery system?
I didn’t.
From what they’ve claimed, it’s a possibility.
They could be claiming that to keep us away from nicotine patches.
They could have compromised the patches and be bragging about it.
The story of Gideon seems very relevant, here.
I don't think that there's a nicotine plant; it's called a tobacco plant.
So they may or may not actually help what may or may not actually be a problem?
Similarly trying to figure out if taking Zeolyte is actually helpful as well, and which of those to look at…
Figuring things out in this war is just absurdly difficult…
What i cannot reconcile in my mind is why would a pharmaceutical drug such as ivermectin, be effective against nano microchips or whatever the hell it is that she is saying is in the clot shots?
It isn't. The clot shots have multiple things in them. We have learned about different supplements that help fight or clear these different things.
Ivermectin fights off the lipid wall breaking parts of the manmade bioweapon which insert spike proteins and other junk into the cells. Zinc is important as a helper here, blocking the attack sites.
Nattokinase helps take out the spike proteins, while all the supplements that support immune system front line fighters help this and other parts as well. Natto also lowers blood pressure without all the big pharma side effects, so if course they tell you not to take it if you're taking cholesterol or blood pressure meds. I know now several people who were able to get off those meds by starting a regimen of natto.
N-Acetyl Cysteine (NAC) helps the body produce glutathione, which clears toxins from the bloodstream like graphene oxide.
I don't know why anti-parasite meds like ivermectin, fenbendazole, mebendazole do so much good against so many things like cancer and bioweapons, but they do, which means that collectively the medical industry either knows next to nothing or has been hiding a heck of a lot from everyone. Or both
Cancer is a parasite infection.
Parasite Pill 2.0
Stages of Parasite infection:
Parasites infect local tissues [Stage 1}
Rapid Parasite growth >>> Parasites burrow deeply into local tissues [Stage 2]
Parasites protect themselves by infecting/damaging lymph nodes [Stage 3]
Parasites get into blood stream and spread to other parts of body – metastaic [Stage 4]
No active parasites but inactive parasite larva which may activate years later [Remission]
What other common disease has 4 stages and a remission state? [Cancer]
Cancer is uncontrolled harmful growth of our own cells. It always happens in all of us, but normal healthy systems clean it out. If enough damage is sustained by our systems, such as from radiation, malnourishment, toxins and/or parasites, we are no longer able to maintain ourselves.
Thus there are many kinds of cancer, and unless the sources of the damage to our immune systems are resolved, it will absolutely return. Radiative and chemical attacks upon us, such as "chemotherapy" will cause lasting damage and make the body more susceptible to all sorts of problems, including harder cancer.
Im not trying to argue with anybody. I've read so much i can't keep it straight anymore. I just thought i remembered a protocol to get rid of vax included IVM. These evil bastards all need put to death. That's all i know.
Can lifeforms only be carbon based?
Based on what advanced biochemists know, no. Lots of very geeky sci-fi explored that idea. But everything on this planet seems to be, and it's not yet fully apparent why that is. It's almost as if it were specially designed by a super genius or something... Which is probably why every serious scientist in the real world that I've ever encountered is a true believer in intelligent design and usually extremely religious.
I guess you'd have to define lifeforms. Would you consider a robot with AI a lifeform? I just wonder how ivermectin would do anything to nanochips. What mechanism would make Ivermctin effective against a computer chip? Rhetorical question because I doubt any one on here can come up with that answer.
Reminds me of the videos of people claiming there were worms in the covid shots, featuring people with acting abilities worse than seen in a junior high play.
It is possible because the protocols for transport, storage and mass manufacture of "covid19" vax was very lax and inconsistent.
But your point stands that too many people came out talking about worms and parasites and not enough on the graphene and nano tech.
Charles Lieber - nanotech scientist - working with the chinese - the influenza strain used for the mythical COVID implanted nano tech machines into people.......(transhumanism) and the mRNA gene therapy shots that were NOT vaccines - started attacking the immune systems - and it continues until the hose dies.
Video is too short, lots of quick clips - needs to be covered more extensively if they want people to accept these findings.
More than covered, she needs to provide a replicable method for independently validating her findings.
Equipment, procedure, chemicals, target object identification, etc. A 2500x microscope can be had for under $300, for example. What next?
u/tweety51a
That, fundamentally, is what “science” actually is - publication of findings and methodologies so that independent researchers can recreate and validate claims for themselves.
I’m sorry it came off as lecturing, and maybe it was (didn’t re-read just now, but it’s one reason I will often edit a lot of my posts after writing them) but note that I didn’t intend it that way, and was stating that from not having seen it available.
You are correct, I didn’t know of or read those things, and was commenting from the information I have, which you are also correct didn’t go into any papers or know where they are at. I didn’t see them cited here, or know where they might be.
There are a lot of things presented in the way that I stated, though, and while it can result in this reaction, justifiably, I do try and go back to the “dumb underlying requirements”, as people often miss them, myself included. Not trying to imply that anyone didn’t know them, just to be sure it isn’t missed, out of my own having not seen it.
Autistic information review and such - also I tend toward broad associative research and reasoning, and not deep, specific research, though I’ll occasionally dive to mid-deep levels.
I'm not sure what I think of this^
but I do know that JFK Jr.'s prophetic February 1997 George Magazine talked about nanotechnology...it's the edition with Bill Gates & a future lung attacking virus.
I would provide the link, but Archive.org isn't working👽🤖
They have always been there: Electro-lights, duh! /s
This should be ridiculously, RIDICULOUSLY, easy to verify.
I wonder why it's not independently corroborated. 🙄
Self-assembling little monsters in the vials have been, for years. I've been watching South Americans and Europeans (swiss, German, Spanish) examine them. They're freaky and react to heat, light and certain frequencies of radiation. I know Russians, indians and Japanese find things in vials as well, and I recall mention of comparisons to luciferase. Just because you haven't been spoonfed info didn't mean it's not out there. This is supposed to be a research board ffs. Take a seat.
Not everyone has microscopes at that magnification.
Nor is it ready to just walk in and grab a vial. I tried, lol
apricom, you have no idea whether or not it has been independently corroborated.
Honestly this is way to fantastical to even be on this board imo
Nanotech is very real.
Self assembly via light is not a new concept in the world of nanotech. Think of it like a kid playing with magnets. Light is the on switch and darkness if the off switch.
You're way too Luddite to be on this board imo
Eh i expected to be downvoted tbh. I believe in nanotech dont get me wrong but self assembling robots in our blood is wild! To what end? Lots of unanswered questions right when people are truly turning to us. Its bad timing if anything.