This is not a research post. It's an 'opinion piece'.
I'm noticing a few posts that rag on Pompeo, with an assortment of anons (most who I do not recognize, but some who I do) jumping on the bandwagon and ragging on Pompeo, with all sorts of what seems to me to be narrative deployments against Pompeo that have an ambiguous or dodgy basis in actual fact.
In other words, (it seems to me, even though I might be wrong, of course) these are lots of conclusions drawn from narratives and headlines, without any serious research into the specific matters.
It appears to me that the DS intel apparatus (via media, etc) has made a very concerted attempt to smear Pompeo and destroy his reputation with MAGA, much in the same way that people like Michael Flynn have been attacked by obvious disinfo operatives and fake maga.
Pompeo's vulnerability to such is perhaps greater than Flynn's, because he actually served Donald J. Trump in his administration for four years, in some very key areas. So there is a lot of fodder for the DS propaganda and intel machine to spin narratives around him and seed these to MAGA and those either in or adjacent to the Great Awakening.
Given the right push, some of these narratives take on a life of their own.
Somehow, even though the breakthrough Abraham Accords were accomplished through and with Pompeo by Trump (incl. Kushner), Pompeo is a warmonger.
Somehow, even though DS anti-Trump Marxist journalists created the story (based on anonymous sources) that Pompeo orchestrated a plot to kidnap or even murder Assange, the story is seen as true.
Somehow, even though Trump saw fit to work with and rely on Pompeo for the entire four years of his administration, Pompeo is evil.
He also said things that hurt people's feelings in the same way that Trump hurt leftist's feelings. e.g. "If Trump is guilty of improperly holding classified documents, then he should be charged". (Bastard, right?)
It makes sense for different people to have different opinions re: Pompeo. But we are in the midst of a 5G war. Narrative war. Psychological war. There are serious forces attempting to manipulate us. Both sides do this, even if it is for completely different reasons.
It might be my own personal bias, but in these posts, I see people not thinking with critical reasoning, people reacting from charged emotions based on narratives that have been sown out there, which trigger reactive emotional responses that make the task of sorting fact from fiction harder than it should be. Or could be.
These frens hate and despise Pompeo, but do they ever ask "Have I been manipulated to hate Pompeo"? Some people think that they trust Donald Trump, but somehow, when it comes to Pompeo, Trump must be an idiot. Or ignorant.
One thing worth thinking about. If DJT 'caught them all' and still put Pompeo in to the CIA, well, that's like putting someone into the most dangerous, most cesspoolish environment possible. The C_A don't f*ck around. They are far worse than the Mafia. As an organization, the evil elements in the C_A kill people and are responsible for what are probably the very worst crimes perpetrated by USA actors over the past century.
To survive in that environment, you'd have to be as hard as nails. Harder. much, much harder. So regardless of what people think of Pompeo, they shoudl recognize that good or bad, he's NOT going to be just some run-of-the-mill schmuck dude. He's not going to behave like a politician, and he's not going to behave like an influencer. I think that's worth thinking about or examining whenever examining what Pompeo has said.
Note: I do not mean to be disparaging of other frogs who have different opinion re: Pompeo. I am simply attempting to make a case for why I think their conclusions or beliefs are different to mine. But its also true that sometimes those different opinions are based on facts or information I do not know.
Anyway, we'll see if Pompeo is brought in to DJT administration #2. If he is, then some people (frogs), I think, are going to have to confront some serious cognitive dissonance.
I mean, cognitive dissonance isn't something that only afflicts the leftists or those with TDS. It happens whenever someone has been manipulated (without their awareness, by actors or events, or by ones own self) into believing something that simply isn't based in reality or truth, and when they are then confronted with the reality or truth that contradicts a deeply held but erroneous belief.
If you are human, then you are potentially subject to that. We all are.
I have my own view and opinion about Pompeo. I think that DJT trusts him, that DJT trusted him enough to put him in some very difficult positions, including to lay the groundwork for the neutralization of the CIA to the extent necessary for the first phase of the Trump Plan (i.e. 3 stage plan). I also think that there has been a set of concerted efforts to undermine Pompeo in the minds of Trump supporters. I also think that like a number of collaborators with Trump, Pompeo engaged is some form of kayfebe or role play during the second phase of the Trump Plan (aka the "joe Biden" administration period of 4 years).
That view is significantly influenced (informed?) by how I understand the Q operation and also by Trump's actions, but I also try to inform those views with facts, via research, digging, and reflective analysis. I might be wrong in my conclusions, but I try to include data and research to backup my opinions or views, and to inform them as much as feels necessary.
Normally, in this sort of situation, I would write a research post enumerating the various claims against Pompeo, posting what facts and information I could dig on them, to offer some airing of the narratives and how well they gel with facts, and them discuss my (or possible) interpretations based on that data and factual information.
I might do that in coming days. I'm hesitant, because when I write such posts, many hours of research and digging and writing go in to them, and that takes a lot of energy. Anyway, for now, I'll just share my opinion piece.
Perhaps it will provide an opportunity for some interesting discussion!
Note: I made a start on one such post, that deals with the origins of the "Pompeo tried to kidnap and assassinate Assange" narrative here. I still think its worth reading as a starting point to getting to some of the facts around this particular anti-Pompeo narrative.
Now, let the flamming and the downvoting begin!
God bless America.
I’m gonna say no to Pompeo. I used to have some hope for the guy but in all honesty, if your former C 👁️ A, I’d just rather that person sit this one out.
There’s no such thing as a “former CIA”.
Good point
President Trump appointed him to that position.
Pompeo served ONE + year as Director of the CIA. January 2017 to April 2018. He then went on to serve as SOS, again nominated by Trump.
Pompeo served as a member of the House of Representatives (Representing the state of Kansas) from 2011 to 2017.
Trust Kansas. - Q
Maybe it is as simple as that. "Sometimes a cigar is just a cigar"
You know, your right. Hmm. And then there’s that “trust Kansas”. As I said, I’m not mad at the guy. I used to cheer him on. It’s just that I don’t know. It’s my ignorance. I’ll put it this way, if Trump picks up, I’ll support the idea. I mean I wasn’t assured about Vance when he was chosen. I’ve come to really appreciate that guy. I’m pretty sure Trump knows what he’s doing.
I noticed Trump had Pompeo speak at some of his final rallies before the recent election. If they were on the outs I don't think Pompeo would have been there.
If Trump appoints kash Patel or another warrior to lead the CIA, then will that mean Kash is forever a bad guy because at some point he would become former CIA?
Maybe Trump does what many suggest and he just wipes out a bunch of these IC divisions and starts anew.
Umm no. Has Kash ever worked for the CIA? I mean I realize your being a Mr smartie pants saying it that way. Anything new, isn’t old. I mean Trump is the President, is he bad because bad guys have been president as well? Shall we go on that stupid ride? You’re better than that. And as I’ve already said, I was unaware that Mike was only ever in the CIA because Trump placed him there. That’s my ignorance of that history. But…I’d still rather have someone else. And once again…if Trump chooses Pompeo, I’ll be fine with it. Just as I’ve already said..again I wasn’t hyped about Vance, but have come to really appreciate that fella.
I should have stated first, not directed at you. I was just adding to the conversation in a brainstorming, idea generating way and chose to jump in where I did.
Personally, I think we move on from Pompeo. I would prefer all new people, and better yet, starting new departments that allow us to remove the CIA and FBI.
It's my personal opinion that the IC has been running our country for decades.
As an example, I think they wiped obama's history, pre-Illinois Senator, and installed him as a blank slate.
Again, not directed at you fren.
Agree 100% on the dismantling of those two 3 letter agencies. Basically continue what JKF was attempting. And again, totally agree about Obama. That guy is an asset born and bred. I’m blanking out on what IC means? What is that?
Intelligence community?
IC = Intelligence Community
I use IC for shorthand when I don't want to type out DOJ, AG, FBI, CIA, DHS, DIA, CISA, TSA, and all the rest of the so-called "intelligence" agencies that appear to be wholly corrupted and compromised.
Agree, I'm not for sure about anything. I really like Vance as well after listening to what he is all about.
I'm just pointing out that we really don't know what the hell is going on, but these are VERY interesting times!!
Trump appointed a bunch of shitbags. Scarrammuci, Amarosa, Wray…He shouldn’t appoint anyone from the last crew. Maybe Rich Grennell.
Trust him to do what? Be bad or be good
u/#q4486
** What advantages might exist to Sec of State re: former Dir of CIA?**
I think Pompeo plays a very, very important role.
I’d trust Pompeo before I’d trust Vance.
More than Vance? That’s very interesting. I once felt that way about Pompeo. I was like, this is the freaking guy, esp after the stolen election of 2020. I just got so flustered with alot of people I felt should’ve had Trumps back and the people of this country, I’m sure I have some inner sore spot against Mike. Not his fault. I was ignorant of Q and the plan at the time. But as we’ve seen this play out, esp with the plan. Pompeo was just his part. Like I feel Sessions is/was. If Trump chooses him, I’ll support him with no doubts.
Vance is poised for an Et tu, brute. And his wife is likely an Indian intelligence asset.
Just because I said more doesn’t mean Vance’s starting point wasn’t abysmal
It's a no from me too. I just don't trust him.
https://revolver.news/2024/11/deep-state-mike-is-hacking-his-way-back-into-the-trump-administration/
According to 3 deep state leftist journalists who used anonymous sources.
Thank you for being up front about that. Noted.
Pompeo rounded up Chinese spies, exposed ops like the Thousand Talents. Add that to the list of things a DS agent would not do.
He also attended one of the recent rallies where Trump gave him a shout out. I watched most of the October rallies, to my knowledge Trump has only ever hosted true patriots who are loyal to him.
Yep.
As I stated in the post, I think a lot of folks are swayed by narrative deployments rather than actual facts. The facts speak very strongly, if people are prepared to listen.
A good example, imo, of how successful enemy black propaganda can work, even on so-called 'awake' people.
The story was created by 3 anti-trump leftist DS journalists.
One of those journos published a book on the Russia hoax, asserting the hoax and pushing the Putin got Trump elected narrative.
They used only anonymous sources (they do not identify any of their sources except that they are "former officials". Impossible to verify.
Everything else out there stems from their story.
Interview with Megyn Kelly, Pompeo offers his rebuttal. BUT, because he is/was working in intel and at the very core of some intel operations, he (obviously) cannot simply say what the situation was. However, the denial is rather clear. Moreover, I could see no signs of deception, fwiw. (body language, behavior, words)
^^^ THIS ^^^
Somewhere in the q posts it says 'trust Kansas'. That is or was Pompeo's nickname. Now all who have followed q from day 1 know that many q references have double meanings and some are mirrors. So I'm stuck here with waiting to see what happens, just like everyone else. You don't always know at the beginning of a movie who the bad guy is. Sometimes you have to wait till the last scene. I'll wait for the credits. See if there are any spoilers at the end. Either way, wwg1...wga.
Q wrote "Trust Kansas" twice, and in multiple posts, makes it explicitly clear that they mean Pompeo.
https://qanon.pub/?q=KANSAS
Also Q2979
Q said Trust Wray also. Jus sayin!
The jury is still out on Wray as well. Nothing is for sure in this information war. We are not privy to all the subterfuge and shouldn't be.
The Art of War.
Yep.
You said Subterfuge
Grassley is ALSO from Kansas. 🤷♀️
Remember - Q, was sometimes cryptic and not always talking to Anons. Just because SOMEONE decoded “Kansas = Pompeo” doesn’t automatically make it true. I’m not arguing for or against Pompeo…I think we still need to maintain a 10000 ft view.
All major movements eventually become infiltrated. Red stringers can be dangerous.
If you REALLY dislike Pompeo being part of the new administration, go to 45office.com and tell Trump! He listens!
Grassley was born in Iowa and is still there to this day.
Q says "trust Grassley" twice though. Unlikely that Kansas and Grassley both refer to the same person.
There is enough evidence in the Q drops to be quite certain that "Kansas" = Pompeo.
Of course, there is a lot that we don't know about what Q was doing or saying. However, the real point of the Q drops is for people to train themselves to think outside of groupthink. That means taking in data, facts, information, applying critical thinking, prayer, and becoming informational processing units.
Some folks think the point of the Q drops was just to make some predictions.... Sigh.
No, Grassley is from Iowa. Born & raised. Attended college in Iowa.
Aye that be it ;)
could be disinfo to fool the DS lurkers, as Q says disinfo is necessary so who knows.
You can always bring up this argument. So its actually useless. With that argument or premise, you also have to add data, facts, information, analysis and reasoning.
You can also trust someone to do what you expect on the chessboard without trusting them to do what is right…
I see Pompeo as a fair weather guy. Work for the administration thats sitting. Bad thing is he has made it evident if that is being part of the corruption to keep his job he will do it. Why anyone trusts him at all is a mystery so I assume no one does. So the question then becomes how is he still standing. My guess. He is holding onto a lot of secrets
In general, I would agree with that assessment. I see him as another plant in Trump's admin who was told to play ball and used as the front man. It's quite possible one of his entourage was the real go-between during sensitive negotiations, while Pompeo and other "leaders" were in their big meetings.
Perhaps Pompeo is a psyop against the DS. I’m not worried about him. Sometimes Trump has to put people in certain positions to expose themselves as DS players. Who knows? God. Frogs just need to sit back a see how this all plays out. The movie is not over. 🍿
If he did that, then Pompeo was already exposed as such.
This shouldn't be another 4 years of putting bad people in positions to "expose" them.
That would end up betraying the mandate. These 4 years, things need to get done.
The People gave him a mandate, and it is undeniable this time. If we repeat what happened before losing the advantage of both House and Senate in addition to the Presidency like what happened in 2018, then that's bad.
That is true but I trust Trump and the plan. They’re not going to make any mistakes now. I personally think he shouldn’t pick Pompeo but if he does I’m not worried about it. Q+ has got this.
Pompeo was possibly placed as a mole into CIA
i know 2 things: pompeo helped alot during the 45 administration. regardless of if hes white black or grey. he accomplished things that trump wanted him to accomplish.
Pompeo dissapeared after 2020 was stolen and appeared at most times incredibly opportunistic at best and downright hostile at worst.
maybe be design? idk, there is a metric fuckton of ambiguity here.
I think Pompeo is playing a part. Q always said that some people weren't whom they seem. Some good guys playing bad guys and some bad guys playing good guys. Although I don't like him by sight I can over look the trips and what seemed to be comms he posted just before power was turned over to Sleepy.
I trust Trump with these decisions completely now. His whole presidency was a sting. He knows who is really on team america and who isn’t now.
Don't forget Pompeo showed up with a boot
I have never looked into the guy but he lost me the second he posted that he stood with Ukraine. I also believe tucker carlson when turcker stated pompeo wanted Julian Assange assinated.
I always liked that Pompeo calls out China as enemy.
Why take a chance?
It's possible Trump knows things we dont,but i don't see it.
Kek.
It's 100% certain that Trump knows things we don't. That should be 100% obvious.
I do like to be polite....
aaaah.....
you got me!
Seb Gorka just went scorched earth over Pompeo on the radio. He said "fatass can sit in a tub full of molasses for the next four years" . He has no business being in next administration.
I don't hold Seb Gorka's opinion in particularly high esteem, myself... But I do not know a lot about him, either.
I think Gorka is either a toadie or only out to enrich himself. That dude was vehemently anti Q and shit on truthers big time in the past.
He's just a voice fag imo. No talent, just an accent and an ego.
Gorka just shit on Q the other night. Gorka can eat a bag of dicks
I don't trust gorka
It’s a movie
I recall he was a good shit poster. only a few if none of the people Trump had last time should be involved this time. Unless they were MAGA and support Trump from the start. That is a small pool of people like General Flynn. General Flynn was removed by the deep state the first. General Flynn gets a chance again.
We may be surprised one which side people are on. You do need Stealth Bombers at times. No better way to get good intel. Some may never be disclosed for security reasons. I trust DJT knows whats going on and who he can trust at this point.
For the informed plebs, it boils down to one main thing. Pompeo floated assassinating Assange while he was interned.
To folks like Rogan, Dore, Smith, Bet-David, et al... he is no different than HRC (as she is also a war hawk & got caught suggesting the very same thing).
Not hard to imagine a WH floating that idea to see who's interested in pursuing.
Free cheese in every mousetrap indeed fren.
Kek I can't get past Pompeo looking like the shrunken head guy from Beetleguise these days! Anyone who undergoes that kind of dramatic physical transformation deserves scrutiny, all skullduggery aside!
kek, he does look like that guy. Wonder what the story is behind that transformation...
Pompeo lost weight really fast, he was a little big and heavy. A nutritionist I learned a little bit from said that weight loss needs to be slow, a little bit at a time, because fats around the waist can store up a lot of toxins. ____. So a theory is when the body gets all those fats and toxins all at once being affected, and some going around the bloodstream, it will age the person 10 years really fast.
Don’t lose weight the Pompeo way!
My theory; statins can do some good work (Dr. Ford channel on “flufftube” as David Nino R. calls it), but they can also lead to rapid weight loss and do a lot of harm. Cite Dr. Graveline (former astronaut), Dr. Malcolm Kendrick of Scotland https://drmalcolmkendrick.org/, and Dr, Hannah Yoseph (USA) whose M.D. husband was injured from the sttatins. — I think Pompeo was prescribed them and in months he was changed.
I could go on and on, after statins I could barely walk, they mimic mycotoxins ( https://bookscouter.com/publisher/hannah-yoseph).
I noticed flair exists for MAHA, maybe in 2025 after there is a precipice I’ll make a post on statins and cancer and memory loss (brains need cholesterol to function!). ____ Edit : frens here already alerted us to statins : thanks Vapourface with the pdf https://greatawakening.win/p/17tegTlSTh/statins-bad-cholesterol-good--a-/c/ and others here, GAW search “statins”
In the meantime, to the doctors who prescribed them to my mother who ended up dying at least 10 years too young: “My name is not Inigo Montoya, but you killed my mother, prepare to die.”. (from their own fake medicine vaxxes and statins)
If he is a double or triple agent or undercover WH he would do this. Q says Trust Kansas so who knows...
Q knows.
If people are motivated, they can try to figure out the puzzle.
i see a lot of people simply looking at the puzzle and going, it's THIS. Without actually working the puzzle.
I find this quite disappointing... (tbh)
Good post. We should always be vigilant. Pompeo is a Grey Hat for me at the moment. The smooth transition was NOT smooth at all!.
But a part of me thinks he has been playing a role, perhaps to fool the deep state. After all, despite the "plot", Julian Assange was not killed and now is free.
Around that time, Pamela Anderson paid a visit to Julian at the London Ecuador embassy, and the next thing there were stories of Heathrow (or Gatwick) being shut down, due to somebody flying a drone about.
I had this niggle in my head, that Assange would make a pretty good Pamela if you put a big blonde wig on him....hmmm I thought the White Hats might have been moving Julian. There were Shenanigans at the time for sure!
This is the thing about Pompeo. I thought a lot of his tweets were confirming Q posts much like Trump and Savinos were. I thought his had a lot of proofs as well.
I prefer the White, Grey, and Black hat buckets.
OP is right in that we simply don’t know for sure (thanks for the well thought out post OP).
So for me I will classify Pompeo as Grey for now. (Which to me means I don’t know, but there is good reason to watch because Grey is a crappy color).
Thank you Robots. That's right. We do not know.
I'm finding something REALLY curious. There is almost a mutiny on X with people like catturd and Bongino leading the charge, that Pompeo must NOT be given a role by Trump.
So all these people ELECT Trump, but then think "We know better than Trump! You must not do this!!!!"
It's amazing. You do not get to dictate to the President his decisions. You get to either elect him, or not. You choose whether to trust him, or not. After you elect him, you do NOT then get to dictate to him what he can or cannot do.
Bongino thanks all the Controlled oppo figures like Hannity, etc, for Trumps win. Thanks Bannon almost as an afterthought.
Seems to me like the controlled opposition has now been activated for THIS time. Right after Trumps election, run a massive campaign telling Donald J Trump what he can and cannot do. backed by all their emotion and narrative etc.
It's astonishing.
The decks have been cleared, DJT hs flushed out ALL the fake and false RINOs and others. That's what the whole 4 years were for.
The only real way that the DS can now attack is to mobilize a mob mentality creating a mutinous furor against DJT to cripple him.
It's truly astonishing. People are not acting based on facts, reasoning, rationality, but all on rabid emotions, with people like bongino leading the charge. Watch is emotion-filled rant AGAINST Donald Trump, telling Trump what he CANNOT do.
Astonishing. The very opposite of what Q trained us all to do.
Pompeo is a huge no.
He is not to be trusted .
Pompeo was over the CIA----need I say more?
Trump appointed him to that position for ONE year then nominated him for SOS.
For what purpose?
Things are not all black and white.
Yes. If you want to find the truth.
More! Pompeo came out to run for President AGAINST Trump. I do not trust him in the least. He is a swamp creature until proven otherwise!
PPS. I will say that I have had a good impression of the Revolver in the past. So I'm considering this article seriously.
https://revolver.news/2023/03/yes-mike-pompeo-sucks/
I find it curious,however, that the article quotes left-wing globalist rags like the Guardian and WaPo to make its case. I'd not trust them with a ten foot pole, myself.
More than anything, I'm interested on coming to an opinion based in facts, not on narrative.
The revolver article is worth reading, but also worth reading with a critical eye.
Time will tell. If Trump puts him back in the Admin., it would mean he trusts him.
Ps. "He is a swamp creature until proven otherwise!"
Hey, that's your prerogative. Given what I know about what he did with DJT, and other actions, I prefer to believe his a Trump ally "until proven otherwise".
I do not trust him since he was over the CIA and did nothing to clean it out. My opinion does not have to be your opinion. We can agree to disagree until he proves himself one way or the other.
Er, he did NOT run against DJT. Fact.
Don't have to trust him. But find the facts, instead of just believing everything you hear, right?
The Epoch Times https://www.theepochtimes.com/ Mike Pompeo Tells Chicago Crowd He’s Prepping for 2024 Run Individual protected by double jeopardy clause. Supreme Court Addresses Jury Verdict Conflict. Don't miss. Learn more. Highlights: Newsletter Available, Help Center Available, Donation Option Available.
He announced and then backed down.
Right. He was preparing. Considering. He decided not to. Your stating that "he backed down" carries a negative connotation. Is ti a fact?: Did Pompeo come out and say "I'm backing down" Do YOU know his reasons for his decisions? No. We only can know certain facts. And the fact is, he did not run against Trump.
What does that prove? Not much. It only proves that... he did not run against Trump. Facts matter.
Btw, Pompeo announced his intention 'preparing to run' in September of 22. DJT announced his candidacy in November of 2022.
Perhaps you consider running against Trump an evil thing, or even considering that early on. That's a lot of projection there. Even DJT ran in the primaries again this time around.
I wonder if you have simply reached a belief that Pompeo is evil and then from that point on, view every bit of information through a lens that confirms your pre-selected belief? Because preparing to run and then deciding not to is not the same as running against and then 'backing down'.
Don't you think its important to distinguish between opinion, belief and fact? I do.
“We are trying to figure out if that is the next place for us to serve,” he also said during the event. “If we conclude it is, we’ll go make the case to the American people of why that is. And in the end, the American people, I pray, will make a good decision about who’s going to be their next leader.”
Well, as ex CIA chief and knowing the CIA is bad to the core I suppose that is where I am coming from. We will see if Trump selects him for anything, that will tell the tale.
Trump made him CIA cheif. He did not come up threw the ranks nor was he appointed by Obama, or Bush, or anyone like that. But, by Trump. That's an important fact.
Flynn hasn't been destroyed by fake Maga. Flynn has been criticized reasonably so for the words that have come out of his mouth, his brother, his actions etc.
Some examples off the top of the head.
There are a lot of valid criticisms against Flynn. Does this disqualify him from being a useful asset to the white hat movement. Not necessarily. But it also is absurd of you to say that people "attacking" him are fake Maga.
Have any idea where I can see this occult prayer thing?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A1_NJSswEZw
Here you go. Also from what I remember the prayer's roots can also be traced back to Madam Lavosky? You'll have to forgive me if that's off though because it's been a really long time since I last looked it up.
Edit: What makes it even worse is he is leading a group of Christians in this prayer too having them recite it back. Which imo is incredibly deceptive.
Nope. Not Madame Blavatsky.
I did not state that all attacking or criticizing Flynn are fake maga. I simply stated "people like Michael Flynn have been attacked by obvious disinfo operatives and fake maga."
This does not mean that anyone criticizing flynn = fake maga.
Do you doubt that there are DS and Cabal dinsinfo operatives out there posing as maga, working to infiltrate the Maga and Q movements? If so, you should really read the whole set of Q drops again.
Do you doubt that there are DS supporters, (il.e. DS Establishment sympathizers and supporters) posing in the Maga movement with the facade of being sincere?
The DeSantis candidacy outed a LOT of them, as did the results of the 2022 election.
Some folks have genuine concerns and criticisms of Flynn. If they are based in facts, data, reasoning, and expressed with clear differentiation between facts and opinions, then I think that's a good thing. However, I also believe that there was a concerted effort to destroy or undermine Flynn's reputation in the Trump supporter and Q movement arena.
fwiw, we could debate each of those points you put out there, but that's a different topic. My point here is that you've mistinterpreted what I wrote as meaning "anyone who criticizes Flynn = fake maga", which is quite incorrect.
This is why its important to actually use logic when discussing differing views.
I've heard rumors that Pompeo was telling people he would be the VP pick even though no one was even speculating it would be him. It could be possible that the plan was for Trump to die right before the RNC convention and Nikki Haley would have been installed as the nominee and she may have picked him as her VP running mate.
that's a whole lot of rumor, speculation and talk.
I'm a very keen fan of facts, myself.
You have the cia. We need to look at them realistically. They are some of the highest trained exceptional people in the world. They hire only the best at what they do. It’s an elite organization. They are loyal to the cia not to the United States. Fracture that and what do you have. An elite force without resources with no direction.
The only way to deal with it is from the top down. Put someone in charge you trust. That is why Pompeo is there. The intelligence community has 6 ways from Sunday to get back at you. Their control comes from their loyalty to the agency and to each other. Pompeo was one of them: he is loyal to POTUS.
Pompeo was appointed by President Trump as Director of the CIA for a little over a year - Jan 2017 to Apr 2018. He then went on to serve as SOS.
He defiantly suspicious, Assange calling him out and the cia of trying to assassinate him stands out. But who knows I do know that cia has factions and they are fighting eaching other.
Who or what is the source for "Pompeo wanted to kill Assange" and is it true or not?
There are alot of hearsay and unless we hear him speak in interviews and such, how can we know this guy??
Too early and not enough info to judge him yet. I'll just rely on Trump's word for now. I'm sure his kids know what we know at GAW and everyone would be warning him like crazy unless it's part of the plan and Pompeo has to play both sides for tics and tacs but ultimately a white hat.
Thank you.
Notice how many frogs around do not even bother to ask this question?
The follow below (my link) should be a good starting point.
When I heard Tuckers statements, I decided (fool that I am, right?) to actually do some research. This is what I found.
Sadly, it seems that 90% of the Pompeo haters around here ignore the facts, and are persuaded because "I trust - [this guy]" (so I hate or distrust [that guy])
Pompeo, Assange and The Evil Pompeo Narrative - Where Did It Start? Are You Paying Attention?
Also, here's clip from a long interview he did with Megyn Kelly, addressing this particular issue.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tDYAb8DO83A
There are plenty of clips of interviews, press conferences etc that Pompeo has done.
IMO, based on the research I've done and inconsideration of the broad field of information, I think that Pompeo has been attacked via intel ops because the DS hates him and fears him.
But we'll see.
Commenting to be lost at the bottom of the thread but when sleeper accounts and new accounts come here and start shilling a topic one way or the other, you know something is up. Pompeo has been a popular topic on other boards today too. Someone is skeerd and activated their minions of division.
He is part of the deep state. Not good and needs to stay away from President Trump's administration.
Well, that settles it! Case closed!
/s
Here:
https://x.com/marlahohner/status/1854672928203260083
Does that help your honor?
/d
Kek.
"If the allegations are true, and there are lots of indications that they are.... "
This is called perfect neutrality and certainly plausible deniability. Pompeo knows 100% that DJT is not guilty of anything here. But did the lawfare attacks on Trump help him or hurt him, do you think?
From a 5G warfare standpoint, was the lawfare desirable, or otherwise.
From a 5G standpoint, its overwhelmingly clear that they were desirable.
One, they increased DJTs populatity.
Two, they gave him super-badass status with a LOT of the normie population, population who had no idea about Q or that DJT has been playing 5G chess.
Three, Trump himself announced the raid on Mar-a-Lago. He knew about it well before hand. Him and Scavino even pre-seeded it with teh phot of the door with "45" on it a few days before hand.
Four, the raid (and the subsequent lawfare, etc) not only generated a lot more sympathy with Trump with lots of different sectors of the American population, it also exposed the lawfare injustices and the corruption of the DoJ establishment system to the whole of the country.
Five, the lawfare, including Jack Smith, have set precedents where the DoJ can now go after 'former presidents' on all sorts of stuff.
Six, it highlighted the complete corruption of Joe Biden crime family in how THEY handled classified documents, further enhancing and fueling the broader awakening.
Maybe you are upset because "pompeo said mean things". But we are called not to be normies, but to be anons. That is, if you are a serious Q patriot or at any level a researcher.
Think with your mind, inthe context of the REAL war we are in (5G, psychological warfare against an enemy who is deeply entrenched and whose existence the vast majority of the population has been completely ignorant of.
Here we are in Nov 2024. Jack Smith just dropped all the charges and cases. So was any real damage done to DJT? Or has this whole saga massively benefited him.
Like certain other persons, Pompeo has taken a neutral, non-defensive position in relation to the four years of attacking Trump stage of the operation. And yet, DJT has had Mike Pompeo on the stage with him at a number of the final rallies in the last weeks of the campaign.
Don't you think that it makes sense to go "actually, Trump knows a LOT more than me, has ALL the information, so maybe I should rethink or at least reconsider MY views in light of his actions as CIC and POTUS?" and "the whole Q operation is about deception and building a ground force of digital warriors who are NOT driven by groupthink, by emotions, by MSM or media narratives, or anyone's narratives" so maybe things are not always "what they seem"?
Hope this helps.
Btw, appreciate the link. But between you and me, I've done a few dozen hours of research and digging in to Pompeo. I'm not saying I've covered all the bases, and there is still a lot I do not know. But I avoid listening to clips and concluding "hey, he sounds nasty! naughty man! Must be evil!" despite all the evidence to the contrary (Trumps relationship with Pompeo, their accomplishments together, the Q operation, the need for kayfabe and out-maneuvering the media, etc).
We're called to go deeper. But of course, "The choice is yours, and yours alone." Q
We don't have to. Not everyone feels the need to. But at a minimum, we should realize that we're in the midst of an intel war, and making judgments too quickly based on things that are paraded before our eyes, and promoted by 'the internet' is not very effective.
Hey, my $02, but I don't mind if we disagree. I'm simply attempting to make my case. No doubt, we can all make up our own minds....
wwg1wga
I have never known Assange to make a baseless claim. Ever. Could Assange get played? Maybe, but he is pretty good at what he does. Pompeo has had things, such as Hillary's emails at his fingertips, but somehow always shies away from follow through. I want him to be one of the good ones, but I'm going to have to see a lot more. It's hard to be overly cynical. The deep state is exactly that. Deep. I'm finally open to the possibility (probability) that Elon is what he appears to be. We have come this far. Trust has to be earned to the extreme.
Are you jewish?
In the prophecy, it seems he is on Trump's side.
"Pompeo: this name I say again will be in your news. Your enemy should be very afraid of what he knows, that I am with him, that he cannot be touched, and that the information he has will destroy more than they realize. My hand is moving to destroy your enemies and to protect the ones I am using."