...I am leaning toward the "more gold than realized" camp...
...I believe all of the talk about "no gold" is just a psyop to understate what is going to happen...
...I have some pretty deep roots down in Kentucky, I asked someone years ago about the gold situation at Ft Knox and was told, "you shouldn't worry too much about that"...
Whatever happened to her? She was all over the place for about 8 weeks then disappeared. Was she just a cameo 'messenger' in this whole play? I feel pretty confident that she knew exactly what she could reveal and where that line was.
I’m in this camp as well. I own some and YAY the price has gone way up but if it goes to 30 dollars an ounce and destroys all the deep state bankers who have been buying it up like crazy I’m ok with that,
For gold to go to $30, the money supply would have to be cut substantially. Like move the decimal left 5 spaces type of money destruction. If the dollar was directly linked, Au would likely be 144k/ozt. There has been historical precedence of this in the past where they issued new bills and kept the coins in circulation, but I think the more possible solution would be crypto and cashless. They're gearing us up for cashless so they can pull the big trick.
Just remember the FED (all caps) is different from the Fed; ForeignExchange Dept.-where all the money is made. Example: all the airports have exchange booths where the fliers can get screwed with all the fees. The banks may be around their levels of being voracious.
Moneychangers ALL!
I'm not certain where I read this (definitely was in a post on this board) but Trump said he dealt with Brics and it is no longer a threat to petrodollar. If he has most of the marbles, he can dictate the rules of the game.
BRICS was only a thing because there is no faith in the "dollar" situation with all the suspected fuckery "at the time".
But we now have all the "known fuckery" of today. Maybe the gold reveal, establishes the stability, as well, the coming clean of the DOGE experience and subsequent paying the price of evil doers puts the credibility back where it was and re-establishes the dollar reserve status.
After all we're leading the way out of the dark for what can hopefully be generations (at least) of humanity.
I recall in about 2005 there was a report out that there was over 200 Trillion dollars worth of gold in Fort Know. Not all of it was our gold. But the reson for the report if I recall corrcetly was ,"Where is all of Hitler's gold". As in he had train box loads of gold. It was hard to move all that gold by rail road because all the tracks were blown up. The theroy is the U.S. Army brought it all back to the United States.
Based on the context, I am in agreement. I have theorized that missing gold would lead to a HUGE awakening. Every American knows that our gold is in Fort Knox.
So, what did Q mean by "Yes" when asked if we had the gold?
Maybe gold was a metaphor? Or, maybe we have it in the sense that we own it, but we need to repossess it?
This is like Geraldo Rivera all over again.
Trump should totally use Geraldo to open the vault and show nothing there.
You are not thinking about Peter David Beter? He wasn't a reporter but became known as "the man who opened Fort Knox" in the 70s. I read transcripts of his audio letters many years ago and he did a deep-dive into all the shenanigans going on at Fort Knox.
The Rothschild gold that was confiscated isn't in Fort Knox. Probably being held somewhere else.
In order for Gold to destroy the FED, you first have to establish value through scarcity or lack of supply.
An empty or lower gold supply than reported creates that financial panic.
The loss of our gold is the snowball that becomes and avalanche for the great awakening.
The knee jerk panic will be the momentum that kills the US Petrodollar/Federal Reserve, US Corporation, the Vatican Bank, and the City of London (Independent Rothschild controlled financial district in London UK).
Both ways gold destroys the fed? Which way is up to them. Many USA Americans don’t know what gold is. This is also planting much seeds in those people. Look at men’s wedding rings for that past decade—not made from gold either. Heck what is marriage right?
In the USA if gold all of a sudden sky rockets to over 10,000 dollars (but what is a dollar anyways?) we will start seeing chaos all over the world at a large scale. Those who take things violently will have the courage to go mining for gold in peoples homes all over the USA and governments will have interest in taking from other countries.
Value has to return. The value of marriage and gold. Both are precious. So yeah, this audit of Fort Knox is to return value to the people. It is a Masterful move.
I think it’s not there. A mass awakening. But the patriots re-acquired the gold already or found it and have it. Perhaps hiding in Iron Mountain or other subterranean cache. 🍿
A very large excess of gold somewhere in the world could account for all the gold that King Solomon had that has never been accounted for, as far as I know.
I have read reports of "There is TOO much Gold in the Universe!" from noted astrophysicists and I say LEAVE IT ALONE! there is no solutioh with dilution!!
😁
Whether there is gold there or not, Gold destroys the Fed because they are so addicted to printing fiat currency that there simply isn't enough gold to go back on the gold standard using the Fed's monopoly money.
True. I guess I'm more thinking gold itself has a price that never changes since its measured against itself and everything else is measured by how much gold that other thing is worth, and until they broke the gold standard and actually made dollars exchanged for precious metal the link was directly calculated in dollars to weight you could actually measure on a scale.
Its so insane to me they printed so much up after that break, that there might not even be enough gold in the solar system. The dollar's done, which is why its interesting to me when we hear talk of replacement currencies going back to a gold backing.
Also a joke I heard on this topic: We used to say large numbers are "astronomical" because the number of stars in teh sky is so big... but even the sum of all stars visible in the night sky in every direction is nothing compared to the quantity of dollars the Fed has printed. We should start calling unbelievably huge numbers "financial" instead of "astronomical" to reflect how huge the numbers are.
Why would we want to return to a gold standard? If the government is corrupted, as it has been for at least 100 years, then they can do shady shit like not let the people audit our reserves. Gold hasn't been audited in 50+ years. Bitcoin is audited every 10 minutes and no on is in charge. I believe Bitcoin is the ultimate Trump card. Space Force Major Jason Lowrey wrote a book called SoftWar about this topic.
1.The contents of your post is correct.
2. The question is to why we would want a gold-standard is valid.
Hence, I see no reason for the down-voat.
To put some mileage on your idea, the first question has to be: what is a gold-standard in relation to paper-slips of I.O.U. called Federal Reserve Notes?
Would that be: 10 pieces of IOU's vs one troy-ounce? This has to do with valuation. At the current position, "gold" is valued at around 42 Federal Reserve Note Dollars.
Given the fact that the Dollar has lost value of 99% of it's gold-standard value we might assume, for the sake of argument, a revaluation at: 4200.
Gold right now is valued around 3000 FRN's.
Say the US would revalue it's holdings at that level, assuming that all gold-reserves that should be there, are there, and what is there is only attributable to one owner: i.e. the USA: it would follow that the demand for gold would skyrocket, since, anything below 4200 is a bargain.
And who is going to deliver? The papering over can no longer happen in full swing since deliverable through the backdoor is now possible. SO, given the demand, the price of 4200 would indeed be a bargain.
Enter: Bitcoin:
Since no gold is available for delivery, what else can a central bank do, to up it's reserves? You would want a reserve that has upside potential and low probability of crashing, is in high demand and able to be leveraged.
And there you go. That is why so many countries are considering a BTC reserve.
However, to fully embrace it's potential, every country who is serious about this needs: low energy costs. Otherwise: mining and sustaining the network is a net loss. Then only political motivation can overcome this, concentrating power in the hands of government, instead of what BTC was envisioned to be.
A basket:
Another approach might be to support a currency with a basket, not of other fiat currencies, but products and proven reserves, like oil, uranium, thorium, Silver, gold, Paladium, Copper, etcetera, in a certain stable mechanism. These items are either needed for the production of energy facilities or used in products that use energy. Because, without energy: you can kiss the whole shebang goodbye, and there no longer is a discussion to be had and will devolve in a simple scheme: is what is on offer useful and what items of usefulness are accepted as a fair value in exchange: i.e. barter.
So, yes, I think there is certainly reason to consider some type of standard in relation to fiat currency. And since we are in the time where anyone can create A currency on the blockchain, why would currency creation be a strictly governmental function?
Final thoughts:
On the other hand, States are constitutionally bound to only accept/use gold and silver in payment for debts.
By tying currency to gold and/or silver, it would create a better position/ claim of constitutional government.
...I am leaning toward the "more gold than realized" camp...
...I believe all of the talk about "no gold" is just a psyop to understate what is going to happen...
...I have some pretty deep roots down in Kentucky, I asked someone years ago about the gold situation at Ft Knox and was told, "you shouldn't worry too much about that"...
Remember this story about POTUS pulling 650 plane loads of our gold out of the Vatican?
https://greatawakening.win/p/16c2WFkolC/if-jan-halper-is-right-about-the/
If true, I’m wondering if there is a link? If that gold exists and was sent to Ft. Knox then there is a lot more gold than is believed.
Or, is it possible this is the gold that is supposed to be at Fort Knox and President Trump is playing mind games with the people who moved it?
And, of course, there is a possibility Jan Halper-Hayes is repeating stories that are true.
"If that gold exists and was sent to Ft. Knox then there is a lot more gold than is believed."
...I believe that is the direction the wind is blowing...
Whatever happened to her? She was all over the place for about 8 weeks then disappeared. Was she just a cameo 'messenger' in this whole play? I feel pretty confident that she knew exactly what she could reveal and where that line was.
I’m in this camp as well. I own some and YAY the price has gone way up but if it goes to 30 dollars an ounce and destroys all the deep state bankers who have been buying it up like crazy I’m ok with that,
" but if it goes to 30 dollars an ounce and destroys all the deep state bankers who have been buying it up like crazy I’m ok with that,"
...precious metals will always have a situational value...
...pigs get fat...
...hogs get slaughtered...
For gold to go to $30, the money supply would have to be cut substantially. Like move the decimal left 5 spaces type of money destruction. If the dollar was directly linked, Au would likely be 144k/ozt. There has been historical precedence of this in the past where they issued new bills and kept the coins in circulation, but I think the more possible solution would be crypto and cashless. They're gearing us up for cashless so they can pull the big trick.
Just remember the FED (all caps) is different from the Fed; ForeignExchange Dept.-where all the money is made. Example: all the airports have exchange booths where the fliers can get screwed with all the fees. The banks may be around their levels of being voracious. Moneychangers ALL!
So what is the consequence of him checking on the gold and then realizing it’s all there? That just means no theft.
"So what is the consequence of him checking on the gold and then realizing it’s all there?"th
...the point is not that the gold is still there...
...the speculation is that there is actually more gold there than anyone previously thought...
...which could have very large economic implications...
I'm not certain where I read this (definitely was in a post on this board) but Trump said he dealt with Brics and it is no longer a threat to petrodollar. If he has most of the marbles, he can dictate the rules of the game.
"If he has most of the marbles, he can dictate the rules of the game."
...valid statement...
BRICS was only a thing because there is no faith in the "dollar" situation with all the suspected fuckery "at the time".
But we now have all the "known fuckery" of today. Maybe the gold reveal, establishes the stability, as well, the coming clean of the DOGE experience and subsequent paying the price of evil doers puts the credibility back where it was and re-establishes the dollar reserve status.
After all we're leading the way out of the dark for what can hopefully be generations (at least) of humanity.
2 cents
Economic Confidence Model : "It's always been about what comes after"
It could very well be that he knows we have much more than anyone could imagine and it could be used against other countries to show their cards
"it could be used against other countries to show their cards"
...absolutely...
I recall in about 2005 there was a report out that there was over 200 Trillion dollars worth of gold in Fort Know. Not all of it was our gold. But the reson for the report if I recall corrcetly was ,"Where is all of Hitler's gold". As in he had train box loads of gold. It was hard to move all that gold by rail road because all the tracks were blown up. The theroy is the U.S. Army brought it all back to the United States.
Kellys Heros
"there was a report out that there was over 200 Trillion dollars worth of gold in Fort Knox"
...that is one large number...
...wags tail mathematically...
Based on the context, I am in agreement. I have theorized that missing gold would lead to a HUGE awakening. Every American knows that our gold is in Fort Knox.
So, what did Q mean by "Yes" when asked if we had the gold?
Maybe gold was a metaphor? Or, maybe we have it in the sense that we own it, but we need to repossess it?
This is like Geraldo Rivera all over again.
Trump should totally use Geraldo to open the vault and show nothing there.
Oh please, no. I get your point, though.
I picture the scene on Dumb and Dumber at the end when they open the briefcase 💼
i always said thats what Social Security looks like
LBJ was the first president to "borrow" money from the trust to fund the war in Vietnam.
They tried to do this decades ago. A reporter was trying to get in to see if the gold was still there. I dont remember how it ended.
I hope they do it Geraldo Riviera style, film the opening of a vault (like he did for Hoffa), then listen for the collective gasps when it is empty.
This theory fits like a glove
Fits like a glove. OMG You're funny. Reminded me of Norm's most damning line on Weekend Update:
Hey, hey! That's my lucky stabbin' hat.
I want to hire a guy to dress like Oddjob and come with.
Wasn't it Capone's Vault?
YT Link: 1986 AL CAPONE'S VAULTS - Geraldo Rivera's BIGGEST FAIL - Full Broadcast
kek What a video! It was Capone. I blame it on my age.
What a tool ! LItTerAly
"If it didnt fit, you must aquit."
I believe it was Capone’s vault.
You are not thinking about Peter David Beter? He wasn't a reporter but became known as "the man who opened Fort Knox" in the 70s. I read transcripts of his audio letters many years ago and he did a deep-dive into all the shenanigans going on at Fort Knox.
I think that maybe what I was thinking about. I remember "old fashioned" camera footage and late 70s or early 80s styles of hair and clothes.
Either way, it just goes to show that Ft. Knox needs to be audited more than once every 50 years.
The Rothschild gold that was confiscated isn't in Fort Knox. Probably being held somewhere else.
In order for Gold to destroy the FED, you first have to establish value through scarcity or lack of supply.
An empty or lower gold supply than reported creates that financial panic.
The loss of our gold is the snowball that becomes and avalanche for the great awakening.
The knee jerk panic will be the momentum that kills the US Petrodollar/Federal Reserve, US Corporation, the Vatican Bank, and the City of London (Independent Rothschild controlled financial district in London UK).
"The Rothschild gold that was confiscated isn't in Fort Knox. Probably being held somewhere else."
Pony up the Sauce or you are just peddling worthless speculations
The white hats have the gold per Q post #2619.
I can only speculate where the gold is. If we don't know, then the black hats don't know either.
MOASS
Both ways gold destroys the fed? Which way is up to them. Many USA Americans don’t know what gold is. This is also planting much seeds in those people. Look at men’s wedding rings for that past decade—not made from gold either. Heck what is marriage right?
In the USA if gold all of a sudden sky rockets to over 10,000 dollars (but what is a dollar anyways?) we will start seeing chaos all over the world at a large scale. Those who take things violently will have the courage to go mining for gold in peoples homes all over the USA and governments will have interest in taking from other countries.
Value has to return. The value of marriage and gold. Both are precious. So yeah, this audit of Fort Knox is to return value to the people. It is a Masterful move.
Very upset.lol. if no gold no debt right?
If all the gold in Fort Knox is gone,this is not going to end well for many who took the gold.
I think it’s not there. A mass awakening. But the patriots re-acquired the gold already or found it and have it. Perhaps hiding in Iron Mountain or other subterranean cache. 🍿
... things that make you go ... hmmm.
Get ahold of Geraldo….😬
Love this Timeline :p great work Yall!!! 💕
Distinct possibility.
I can lean towards that analogy.
Abundance of gold! Thanks Vatican!
A very large excess of gold somewhere in the world could account for all the gold that King Solomon had that has never been accounted for, as far as I know.
I have read reports of "There is TOO much Gold in the Universe!" from noted astrophysicists and I say LEAVE IT ALONE! there is no solutioh with dilution!! 😁
The Matrix is totally shut down. We all need to unplug.
Obongo got gold teef
Whether there is gold there or not, Gold destroys the Fed because they are so addicted to printing fiat currency that there simply isn't enough gold to go back on the gold standard using the Fed's monopoly money.
There isn't enough gold at the current price.
True. I guess I'm more thinking gold itself has a price that never changes since its measured against itself and everything else is measured by how much gold that other thing is worth, and until they broke the gold standard and actually made dollars exchanged for precious metal the link was directly calculated in dollars to weight you could actually measure on a scale.
Its so insane to me they printed so much up after that break, that there might not even be enough gold in the solar system. The dollar's done, which is why its interesting to me when we hear talk of replacement currencies going back to a gold backing.
Also a joke I heard on this topic: We used to say large numbers are "astronomical" because the number of stars in teh sky is so big... but even the sum of all stars visible in the night sky in every direction is nothing compared to the quantity of dollars the Fed has printed. We should start calling unbelievably huge numbers "financial" instead of "astronomical" to reflect how huge the numbers are.
Makes a lot of sense.
Why would we want to return to a gold standard? If the government is corrupted, as it has been for at least 100 years, then they can do shady shit like not let the people audit our reserves. Gold hasn't been audited in 50+ years. Bitcoin is audited every 10 minutes and no on is in charge. I believe Bitcoin is the ultimate Trump card. Space Force Major Jason Lowrey wrote a book called SoftWar about this topic.
IIRC the idea was to have gold BACKED currency, not to go on the gold standard, which can be manipulated
1.The contents of your post is correct. 2. The question is to why we would want a gold-standard is valid.
Hence, I see no reason for the down-voat.
To put some mileage on your idea, the first question has to be: what is a gold-standard in relation to paper-slips of I.O.U. called Federal Reserve Notes?
Would that be: 10 pieces of IOU's vs one troy-ounce? This has to do with valuation. At the current position, "gold" is valued at around 42 Federal Reserve Note Dollars.
Given the fact that the Dollar has lost value of 99% of it's gold-standard value we might assume, for the sake of argument, a revaluation at: 4200.
Gold right now is valued around 3000 FRN's.
Say the US would revalue it's holdings at that level, assuming that all gold-reserves that should be there, are there, and what is there is only attributable to one owner: i.e. the USA: it would follow that the demand for gold would skyrocket, since, anything below 4200 is a bargain.
And who is going to deliver? The papering over can no longer happen in full swing since deliverable through the backdoor is now possible. SO, given the demand, the price of 4200 would indeed be a bargain.
Enter: Bitcoin:
Since no gold is available for delivery, what else can a central bank do, to up it's reserves? You would want a reserve that has upside potential and low probability of crashing, is in high demand and able to be leveraged.
And there you go. That is why so many countries are considering a BTC reserve.
However, to fully embrace it's potential, every country who is serious about this needs: low energy costs. Otherwise: mining and sustaining the network is a net loss. Then only political motivation can overcome this, concentrating power in the hands of government, instead of what BTC was envisioned to be.
A basket:
Another approach might be to support a currency with a basket, not of other fiat currencies, but products and proven reserves, like oil, uranium, thorium, Silver, gold, Paladium, Copper, etcetera, in a certain stable mechanism. These items are either needed for the production of energy facilities or used in products that use energy. Because, without energy: you can kiss the whole shebang goodbye, and there no longer is a discussion to be had and will devolve in a simple scheme: is what is on offer useful and what items of usefulness are accepted as a fair value in exchange: i.e. barter.
So, yes, I think there is certainly reason to consider some type of standard in relation to fiat currency. And since we are in the time where anyone can create A currency on the blockchain, why would currency creation be a strictly governmental function?
Final thoughts:
On the other hand, States are constitutionally bound to only accept/use gold and silver in payment for debts.
By tying currency to gold and/or silver, it would create a better position/ claim of constitutional government.