Meanwhile, Canada continues trying to get Dr. Makis to shut up about how people can save their own lives with inexpensive, safe, off-label drugs.
https://makismd.substack.com/p/ivermectin-fenbendazole-and-mebendazole-585
STORY:
40s year old UK woman, International Athlete (runner) was diagnosed with a 11cm Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma, inoperable.
Was offered palliative chemo only.
In late October 2024, started the Makis Ivermectin Protocol:
Ivermectin 1mg/kg/day increasing to 2mg/kg/day
Fenbendazole 888mg/day, switching to Mebendazole 1500mg/day
Oncologist started Gemcitabine, Cisplatin, Durvalumab
-(See the Substack for the text-images of the correspondence with patient)-
My Take…
Mainstream Oncology has NO ANSWERS for Cholangiocarcinoma.
For most people, I don’t have to explain how amazing this result is.
I believe this is where my work is cracking the foundations of mainstream Oncology.
Cholangiocarcinoma. Pancreatic Cancer. Ovarian Cancer. “incurable”.
The results of Ivermectin, Fenbendazole and Mebendazole with these “incurable cancers” are so dramatic, they leave Oncologists with 30 years experience shaken up and speechless.
This is where the breakthrough will happen.
At some point, there will be an Oncologist at a big Cancer Centre who will want to make a name for himself or herself. They will embrace Ivermectin/Fenben/Meben for use in one of these “incurable cancers” and will treat their adoption of repurposed drugs as something they “just discovered”.
Big pharma is going to put up a big fight but I don’t think they can stop this.
Buddy of mine had stage 4 lung cancer from his time in the marines. Went through chemo and radiation. Was 3/4 through the second round and he felt like it was killing him. He quit. Doc gave him six months to live. He found a fenbendazole and ivermectin protocol and started on that a year and a half ago. Doc can no longer see any cancer.
Doc: I guess our treatment worked.
Yeah, right doc.
He never told the doc because he didn't want to jeopardize his coverage with the VA. Not that it would, he was just wary of running it past them.
Unfortunately, this creates a negative feedback loop and doctors remain uninformed and arrogant.
I think they take an oath to remain uniformed and arrogant/ignorant.
Right? No excuses for doctors no doing a bit of research on these things. The recent (conclusive) and even past studies on cholesterol show that we don’t need statins an we are actually better off without them.
Low fat eating was a scam. Now most are type two diabetic or pre diabetic.
Low fat is bad, 💯%
Low carbs is super bad, 💯 %
Low protein is awful 💯 %
Statins is just as bad as the clot shot. Have you read the side effects? DON'T TAKE STATINS!
Moderation in your diet, don't eat obvious bad things, listen to your body, don't eat crap-tons of food and not expect problems.
Statins accelerate the mechanisms that cause Alzheimers. It killed my mom last year. I wanted to know what did it and how to make sure it didnt happen to anyone else in my family. Cholesterol deficiency and statin acting as an accelerant in 'plaque' development.
Statins are obscene and you are right, fast killers. Floride chafes me too, slow killer that really hits people.
We switched to floride free paste, never looked back.
Well said.
Meh, they are bound to serve using the standard of care and will reject anything that exists outside that standard of care.
This also applies to RDNs and their nutrition interventions.
He had every right to be concerned about the VA. Hopefully that gets fixed sooner rather than later.
I wonder if it could be (successfully) argued that this cancer treatment would fall under President Trump’s ‘Right to Try’ bill from his first term. 🤔
Yep, don't wanna screw up his access to modern medicine, especially at the VA
Absolutely. The government could screw him so bad if he told.
Nice to hear.
I can understand his reluctance to tell the doctor, but leaving the doctor thinking his treatment worked, and not knowing the fenbendazole and ivermectin protocol was the actual cure, prevents the doctor from learning, questioning, and potentially saving lives.
If you haven't been treated by one of these oncology docs who think they know everything, you might not understand. I have been in such a situation, and they do not WANT to know and will ridicule you up and down once they find out. They will most certainly not start telling other patients to pursue iver/fenben etc, instead, they will dismiss you from care then you can't get your screenings prescribed.
Yes, the Dr's are very matter of fact knowledgeable.
Watched my niece suffer 10 of her 11 years with aggressive brain cancer treatments. Chemo, Focal radiation, puberty blockers, all in the name of "science".
The only thing she could hold down was Sprite (full of cancer feeding sugar). Rotted her teeth away, had several brain surgeries and had a couple strokes that limited her mobility, speech and ability to swallow.
My SIL and BIL did EVERYTHING possible with countless trips to Boston Children's trying to save their first born. She passed away peacefully at home 10+ years ago and our family was never the same.
It enrages me knowing what I now know; and pains me that my SIL & BIL will have to learn that her life could've been spared. They will certainly need counseling when they learn what was in the covid shots they and two other surviving daughters all lined up to get.
Agreed, but that is not the point. That doctor would be obligated to narc on the patient.
It's not movie simple where telling the truth makes it ok to break the rules, and people will then just overlook your error, or somehow it makes it ok.
Didn’t Trump get the right to try bill pushed thru Congress?
When there's profit to be made, Mountains can be moved. Where profits are endangered, Mountains are purposely built to bury it. ✌️ ✌️
Doctors probably know that if they expose an inexpensive cure for cancer, that it will likely lead to their own demise by some kind of accident, or "suicide". I have read of researchers who have met this fate.
I hate the medical industry more than any other. Can’t wait for this satanic industry to be wiped out by ivermectin and AI
I think big pharma (and Fauci) have been going after the researchers for a long time. I read a book in the early 90's written by an alternative medicine doctor who was questioning what he was seeing in a cancer research study in college a few years earlier, and he was told to drop it if he wanted to graduate with a degree.
Unfortunately, it was one of many library books my wife was bringing home to read, so I have no recollection of who the author was.
Many moves to Mexico. The alternative centers many in Mexico are run by Americans. I met one guy who moved from California to Baja so he can practice freely.
If you worked for big pharma, and you discovered a cure for cancer, you would die, your spouse would die (murder suicide sound familiar) and your children would probably die. And anyone they thought you told about it. Do you doubt me?
Right now it’s repurposed wormers vs mRNA.
The allopathic (MD) doctors that I know ----- wear the extra narrow set of vision blinders. It's like being a member of a cult.
They still think the mRNA bioweapon is good for you.
Told a friend with urinary bladder cancer about fenbendazole and sent him a link to an article. He later told us that he shared it with his doctor who said "No", so he'll proceed with standard treatments. Sad.
I test positive on my Cologuard test. Doing the parasite cleanse but not saying a word to my doctor.
We have 4 boxes of that stacked in my husband's office. I told my dr. last time not to send me another but she did. They're also known for false positives
That is my hope. False positives !
Not just sad . . . criminal, in my view.
Good news from a friend of mine, whose tumor is shrinking rapidly (Ivermectin)
The big pharma knows it’s unstoppable.
That’s why they want to create new diseases to “build the market” for their own future.
They will lose the R&D funds they take from every single country to “find a cure” for the “incurable” cancer.
They need another scary and “incurable” disease(s).
Seems to me the government could change the paradigm from creating drugs to treat disease to creating cures. They could say they would fund research for cures and award $Bil prizes for each cure. Make the prizes juicy enough that suddenly cures would start popping up that were “suddenly discovered”.
^ This.
Also:
Term limits in politics.
Funds limits in pharma R&D.
They either find the cure and start monetising it, or we assume it’s “incurable” so the funding stops after the limit, at what point the cures would miraculously pop up everywhere.
Stick and a carrot: funding limit as a stick and award prizes as a carrot.
If they don’t take it - their competition will do it for free, at their own cost to get the product to the market.
Treatments make billions per year, forever. One billion for a cure would interest no one. That's why we have treatments and not cures.
I bet if the U.S. government offered a $50Billion prize per cure, they'd gear up to race for cures, especially if the patent is about ready to expire on their "treatments".
It's illegal to say that cancer is curable, first came the UK's 1939 Cancer Act and the USA followed on after WW2 to make this statement illegal.
All to stop quack medicine.
Actually, it was to stop the real cures, and protect the quack pharma medicine.
Paywall? OP could you post the entire article here please
Can't (it's mostly in the form of text-images), but try this:
https://nitter.poast.org/makisMD
(that's the Nitter grab of Dr. Makis' X account)
You might be able to view the posted Substack article by clicking "continue anyway" (or whatever the text is) below the center-page question asking you to sign up -- I believe clicking "continue anyway" takes you to the article. I have an account so I never see that section anymore; I might have the details wrong.
In any case: If you have any reason at all to be interested in the subject of cancer, SIGN UP FOR AN ACCOUNT at Dr. Makis' Substack. His published work is world-changing and he is being severely persecuted by the Canadian government; they are trying their damndest to put him in prison; they are doing a good job of sequestering or stealing most sources of his income, and otherwise mistreating him. Spend the few bucks to sign up for his writings. You'll have access to things you won't find anywhere else.
Yep. I love the research this doctor is doing but it’s all behind a paywall.
It's on Dr. Makis' substack and I don't know if it's a paid article or not. I subscribe for a very low monthly fee ($5 I think?) because he gave me my cancer cure protocol. Here is what I can copy paste from the email I got this morning:
IVERMECTIN, FENBENDAZOLE and MEBENDAZOLE Testimonial - 40s year old woman, International Athlete, was diagnosed with 11cm Cholangiocarcinoma (inoperable). Had a dramatic response after 5 months!
STORY: 40s year old UK woman, International Athlete (runner) was diagnosed with a 11cm Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma, inoperable.
Was offered palliative chemo only.
In late October 2024, started the Makis Ivermectin Protocol:
Ivermectin 1mg/kg/day increasing to 2mg/kg/day
Fenbendazole 888mg/day, switching to Mebendazole 1500mg/day
Oncologist started Gemcitabine, Cisplatin, Durvalumab
(Next are several screenshot images of results of treatment showing massive improvement on the PET scan from April 3rd... she should have been DEAD at this point, but instead the cancer is just dying and disappearing)
MY TAKE (Dr. Makis):
Mainstream Oncology has NO ANSWERS for Cholangiocarcinoma.
For most people, I don’t have to explain how amazing this result is.
I believe this is where my work is cracking the foundations of mainstream Oncology.
Cholangiocarcinoma. Pancreatic Cancer. Ovarian Cancer. “incurable”.
The results of Ivermectin, Fenbendazole and Mebendazole with these “incurable cancers” are so dramatic, they leave Oncologists with 30 years experience shaken up and speechless.
This is where the breakthrough will happen.
At some point, there will be an Oncologist at a big Cancer Centre who will want to make a name for himself or herself. They will embrace Ivermectin/Fenben/Meben for use in one of these “incurable cancers” and will treat their adoption of repurposed drugs as something they “just discovered”.
Big pharma is going to put up a big fight but I don’t think they can stop this.
All of his stories I’ve read on X have all had chemo before starting the protocol. I like to see ones that only used the protocol and no chemo or radiation. Because if I share stories with chemo in it and people are still weird about ivermectin and Fenbendazole, then they will say it was most likely the chemo that got rid of the cancer.
https://www.facebook.com/groups/244815949755622
The Tippins Facebook page has success stories without chemo
Fenben is chemotherapy also
Chemo would have to be considered as working up until now….it has no track record to support this.
This industry should be called sickcare and not healthcare. Cures are bad news for profits.
So I understand people being hesitant to just go the Iver/Fem route. If it doesn’t work, you could die. Does anyone know if people can go with both protocols?
Personally I’d rather try and die than not try at all. Really a “nothing to lose” situation.
Also OPs post said the patient did both traditional chemo drugs and the protocol.
My family has a strong line of cancer deaths. Liver. Bone. Brain.I watched my father, then 51 (40 years ago) go from a big strong man, ran through kemo and radiation for lung cancer, turned into a picture of death and choke on his own blood six months later. I am not blaming it solely on the "cures", the cancer played its large part....but the regression happened immediately when the cures started. I know my time will come eventually. I will not go through kemo and radiation. I am so down on them I really think that when they do seem to work its not really their success, its the bodies kicking in so much to offset them they put the cancer in remission. Or kill it.They are poison. Iver/fem route for certain.
There have been a few studies demonstrating that chemo has a net negative effect, i.e., hurts more than it helps. It's awful to see the damage it does. Those studies are quickly buried and become hard to find.
Lost my mother 40 years ago to ovarian cancer, discovered at 41, died at 46. I now wonder if she had any vaccines in the years months leading to its discovery.
I'm giving fenbendazole to our lab for a large tumor. Our vet is aware of it being used for cancer treatments. He said the only drawback is the cost of medicine for animals is going up and hurting his bottom line. He told me to add vitamin E.
Not that I'm aware of, but I haven't researched the topic. Also, I take plenty of liver-healthy supplements (NAC, milk thistle, SAMe, and several more) and have really good blood test results for my liver, kidneys, etc so don't have much worry for the particular drugs I take (I don't take Tylenol, however, specifically because how hard it is on the liver).