U.S. CONFIRMS IRAN NOT BUILDING NUCLEAR WEAPONS
(twitter.com)
Comments (111)
sorted by:
Israel trying to drag the United States into a war, expecting the Goyim to send their sons into its curated middle-east meat grinder. Our politicians hug the flag of Israel as though it's a warm blanket from their childhood. Fuck all of that.
Seems I remember Gen. Colon Pile saying Iraq had WMDs. 🤔😖
It makes you question every other war we've ever been a part of, or at least the premise of the war being started in the first place. What are we truly fighting for?
War is a real money maker; I cringe thinking of the lives lost for the benefit of the elite.
Think of all the helicopter contracts that went to Texas firms after JFK was killed and LBJ got us into Viet Nam.
1000% this ☝️( aslan )
General Smedley Butler stated "War is a Racket"! "All wars are bankers wars"!
Maybe the love of $$ really is the root of all evil!
One such "banker war" that comes to mind is the infamous War of 1812.
https://www.bandyheritagecenter.org/Content/Uploads/bandy/files/1812/Financing%20the%20War%20of%201812.pdf
war! what is it good for? absolutely nothin'!
maybe some good ol fashioned hippie anti war music is what maga needs now.
Dancin' in the streets ya'll.
"Colon Pile" LOL!
YEP...he was a pile...NO ONE will respect the south end of a north bound mule!!!!!
Also, DON'T forget the BUSHIES!!!! They wanted a War to Get AHEAD ON THE WEAPONS PROGRAM(S)!!!!!!
Perhaps they were looking at selling enriched uranium to make up for lost oil revenue?
Satanyahoo is calling Tulsi Gabbard a liar.
If there is no nuclear weapons program in Iran, why did Israel attack them?
They hug the AIPAC $$!
The U.S. blob is not in this for the same reasons Israel is. They are involved to disrupt the China-Russia-Iran alliance that has formed. They want to weaken Iran just like they want to weaken Russia (via the Ukraine proxy war). The so-called "Iran is making a nuclear weapon" is an excuse.
Why is Trump posting about "Iran can't have a nuke" then?
Because he doesn't want them to have a nuke.
But you are missing the point of the OP.
If (and that is a BIG "IF") the IC report is true, then Iran is not trying to get a nuke.
Personally, I don't believe that.
But Tulsi says it is so, and the point is that if that is so, then Bibi has (a) lied, and (b) committed an act of offensive war for the purpose of getting the US involved. "Oops! We broke something. Can Uncle Sam please come here and fix what we can't fix?"
No, Bibi. Fuck you.
Shut down all funding to all foreign countries.
Let the jews and arabs figure it out on their own.
P.S. Bibi has been crying that Iran is "weeks away" from a nuke ... for at least a decade now.
Not missing the point at all. Trump gave them 60 days and then on day 61 Israel launched missiles. Look at what Trump is posting.
Well, somebody is lying. That's the point.
Either the intel community lied to Tulsi, and she is passing on what she THINKS is true, and they did it to push Trump in a certain direction, or Bibi is lying and he knows Iran is not close to a nuke, but he wants WAR!
I suspect that the IC is lying.
But I would never bet on Bibi to tell the truth about anything, especially when he provides no evidence to back up his claim, and just says, "Trust me, bro."
So, I'm 50/50.
And Trump hasn't really done much here. He allowed USAF to shoot down some incoming, but that's about it.
He is pushing for peace, and talking to Vlad to be a broker for peace (who saw THAT coming?).
Im starting to question Trump. Only so many things can labeled as necessary misdirection until I think "You know what...this is bullshit."
Well the president put his people in government positions. And truthfully he can not just know everything going on in the world. He is a very intelligent man but he still has to rely on information from his sources, if they lie to him and he finds out, they should and probably will be out of a job. Plus it makes him think he can't trust the people he put in place. Just like his first term. And we/he should be way beyond that now.
Let God sort em out... 😁
More than a decade, for sure.
Make that four decades.
Bibi has been crying about Iran nukes since 1992
So, we had intel that Iran was NOT building a nuke yet Israel went off and blasted a bunch of military leaders. Did America pass that intel on to Israel? If no, then Isreal is culpable of murder and America is implicated for not passing on the info. Bad day for America. Really bad week for Israel.
Yes, SOMEBODY is lying.
Either the American intel community, which we know have lied repeatedly...
OR ... Netanyahu, which we also know does nothing but lie constantly.
Take your pick ...
both, it's both
Iran has financed all kinds of groups to attack Israel. Their leadership deserves everything it is getting. I hope the people can depose what is left and have the freedom to live their lives in peace w/o Muslim extremists controlling them.
The Israeli government in Palestine has been genociding arabs and stealing their land, from its beginning 70+ years ago.
Iran is the only arab country that has the balls to fight back on behalf of their own people.
I don't like Iran, or any other Middle East country, but don't pretend that the Israeli government in Palestine is somehow virtuous.
They are not.
They are evil.
That goes triple for that disgusting criminal, Bibi.
Iran is not by any means "Arab." They are Persian.
But the traditional term for the people of Iran is Aryan.
Coincides with what we call Caucasian. The Nazis were much obsessed with Aryan origins. Not at all Arab.
Here is why it seems so confusing:
The original Israelites of the Bible were White. Adam was the first White man, and his descendants were all White, until some of them race mixed with non-Whites.
In Hebrew, "arab" means "mixed" -- as in, race-mixed.
Yes, your local church tells you stories that are not true. They want the MONEY, and so they don't want to offend non-Whites and pussy Whites.
Noah, who was also White, as was his wife, had 3 sons, all White (this is basic biology, or as God said in Genesis 1:1 -- "kind after kind.").
Noah's son Shem had sons. One of whom was Elam. His descendants became the Elamites, and they were the ORIGINAL Persians.
Later, they mixed with non-Whites and created the "Persians" we think of today, but I see them as just as arab ("mixed") as a Palestinian or any other arab.
Another of Shem's sons, Arphaxad, had a son named Shelah.
Shelah had a son named Eber. Eber was the father of the Hebrews.
Shem (aka Sem) was the father of the Semites.
But these are ALL BLOOD RELATIONS.
As long as they do not mix with other races, they are pure Semites or pure Hebrews, etc.
When you see "Hebrew" or "Semite" these were all WHITE people -- until some of them mixed with other races and were no longer pure Hebrew or Semite.
Yes, I know you have been deceived into believing these were the ancestors of modern day jews, but jews are deceivers. They LIE about this. In their own books on their history they admit all this.
Eber's descendants eventually included Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob/Israel.
Hence, the Israelites were (a) the true Semites, (b) the true Hebrews, and (c) White.
The Israelites were captured by the Assyrians around 700 BC and deported from the Kingdom of Israel, which was no more because it was defeated.
Likewise, some of the Israelite people, of the tribe of Judah, were later captured by the Babylonians, and deported.
By the time the Babylonians released the Judahites (and others who were living with them), some went back to what had been Judah. But it was now conquered by the Roman Empire. It had become the Roman province called "Judea."
The Edomites, who lived to the south, moved into the former Kingdom of Judah, and became the governing influence in Judea, subject to higher Roman authority.
These Edomites were the ancestors of modern day jews.
The word "jew" was not in the Bible. It first appeared many centuries later.
Thus, when you see "jew" in your modern Bible, the original OT meaning was a Judahite (of the tribe of Judah, and a true Israelite). When you see "jew" in the NT, the real meaning was a Judean, which was anyone living in Judea (just like a Chinaman, a Mexican, a black, and a White red neck can all be called "Texan" if they live in Texas). By the time of Jesus, Judea had become "diverse."
When the Israelites (Kingdom of Israel, captured by the Assyrians) were released from Assyrian captivity, they never returned to Israel. They instead went north into the Caucusus Mountain region.
Many years later, they migrated into the wilderness of Europe, settled it, and became known as "Caucasians."
They did not know they were the real Israelites of the Bible.
This is why Jesus said, "I have come NOT but for the LOST SHEEP of the House (family) of Israel (Israelites)."
His word was to His lost sheep, who no longer understood who they were.
This is also why ALL of Paul's letters were to his fellow European brothers (White men). He said he, too, was an Israelite, of the tribe of Benjamin. He wrote to his WHITE brothers in Europe, teaching them how to set up their churches and follow Christ.
Jesus had several encounters with what we would today call "jews." He ALWAYS rebuked them as the children of Satan.
In Hebrew, "Satan" means "Adversary." It is not a little red guy with a pitchfork. No, it is much more subtle than that -- they are the adversary of the WHITE RACE.
And all you have to do to confirm that is to look at the history of the White Race, and how the jews have constantly tried to destroy White societies -- and they still are doing it today by funding the invasaion of White countries (and White countries ONLY).
The jews of today are the Edomites of the Bible. Esau/Edom was originally a Semite/Hebrew. But he race mixed with other non-Whites, and the Edomites became a mix of Semite, Canannite, and Kenite, making them no longer Semites or Hebrews (and certainly not Israelites, as that was of Jacob's family line, not Esau's).
The jews admit this in the Jewish Encyclopedia.
The original people of the Middle East were White. Ever wonder how the Egyptians could build magnificent pyramids that nobody today can figure out, but then they accomplished nothing at all for the next 3,000 years?
That's because the Egyptians of that era were White. DNA samples of mummies prove White European genetics -- blond and red hair, and White DNA.
Yes, Cleopatra was White.
But then the non-Whites (arabs and blacks) moved in, and the Whites moved out.
Original "White Flight," just like Detroit or Baltimore.
Next up, we have the magnificent Greek culture with its philosophy, architecture, and art. Those original Greeks were also White Israelites.
But then the Turks moved in, race mixed, and the pure Whites mostly moved out, though some are still there today. The Greeks have done nothing of note in the past 2,500 years.
Next up was the Romans, also White, and built a great empire. But nothing in the past 2,000 years.
Later, the world power moved to Britain, also Whites (of Germanic heritage, via the Anglo-Saxons).
And eventually, America, built also by Whites.
I realize many people will be offended by this, but that is due to your brainwashing from the time you were born.
That was me, too, until I studied history at a deep level, and realized the real story of the Bible.
Your local pastor tells you lies, but he probably doesn't know it because that is what he was taught in seminary school.
We live in a society today where doctors do not learn about health in medical schools, attorneys do not learn about the real law (the stuff that can actually help you) in law schools, police do not learn about enforcing the law in a constitutional manner in police academies, and the clergy do not learn the truth about the Bible in seminary schools.
Hence, the blind are constantly leading the blind.
Exactly what the Adversary wants.
Here is a very good sermon on the true history of Israel and the Bible:
https://rumble.com/v6tv4jv-bertrand-l-comparet-israels-fingerprints-and-historical-proof-of-israels-mi.html
How did Noah's descendant 'mix' with other non-white races? Where were the other races?
Good question. In fact, it is one of the most important questions of all, if you want to understand the story of the Bible.
So, sit down and think this through, because you have probably never heard this reading of the Bible before.
The Bible is a story directed at and about a certain people -- the Israelites. It tells their story and it also tells about their adversary, who is constantly trying to cause problems for them.
Much of our modern Bibles have been changed and corrupted in important parts.
There were other races on planet Earth before Adam.
Notice, Genesis 1:1 says man is created. But it is not until Genesis 1:2 that Adam is created, and he is a special and unique creation, where God breaths the Spirit into him. That is not true for anyone else.
Adam was not the first man. That is a modern day interpretation, and is not true.
In Hebrew, "Adm" means (a) man, but also means (b) ruddy -- the ability to become red in the face. Only Whites can become red when angry or embarrassed.
We have archeological discoveries from the Assyrians. They were proud of their conquests. They created art on pottery depicting the people they conquered.
The Israelites were depicted with typical White European features. Canaanites they captured were depicted with typical jewish features (hook nose, extreme curly hair).
Moses was adopted by the Egyptian Pharaoh's daughter. It was said that Moses looked identical to the Pharaoh's own son, to the point that people could not tell them apart.
We now know that the people of that era -- the ones who built the pyramids, around Moses' time circa 1500BC, around the 17th or 18th Dynasty -- were White Europeans. DNA from the mummies of that era prove it. This is knowledge that is not promoted in the mainstream, but it is out there if you look for it.
So, the Pharaoh was White, his son was White, and Moses, an Israelite, was White.
Moses was not merely an Israelite, but one of the most important men in the story of the Bible.
We also have Cain. We have a lot of corruptions in the modern-day translations of the Bible from the original texts.
Remember, Cain was banished from the garden, and he went out, found a wife, and built a city. Where did he find those people, if it was only Adam, Eve, and Cain?
Answer: There were other, non-Whites, already on Earth.
This also explains Neanderthal Man, etc. They existed before Adam was created 6,000-7,000 years ago.
In fact, the very earliest White European DNA that has ever been discovered is from the time period around Adam and shortly after.
There are no White European remains that have ever been found that are any older.
In the NT, Jesus tells us that he came to reveal things kept secret from the foundation. This means the OT did not give us the full story.
In Revelation, he tells us that there was a war in Heaven, and Michael defeated Satan, casting him out onto the Earth.
Satan and his "people" were already on Earth when Adam was created.
This is why Satan or one of his ("Serpent") was already in the Garden of Eden. God did not put him there.
Also, the Serpent/Satan deceived and seduced Eve.
The "fruit" was an idiom used back then to be a more polite way of describing sex.
Eve had sex with the Serpent, which produced Cain (not Adam's biological son, but rather that of Satan).
Eve introduced Adam to sex, as well, which is why they were naked. Eating an apple doesn't do that to you, right?
So, Cain was a child of Satan, while Abel was a child of Adam. But he died, and Adam had Seth. "Seth" means "replacement" for Abel. It is Seth's biological line that would eventually produce the Israelites.
This is why Jesus would confront the jews in the NT, telling them they were the children of Satan, and their father was the murderer from the beginning.
Also notice, that when God cast Cain out of the Garden, Cain protested that "the others" will kill him.
What others?
Those other non-Adamic people. They were the Nephilim (which means "fallen ones"), which we later learn about.
And what did God do?
He "made a mark" on Cain so that others would know who he was.
My opinion (it does not spell it out in the Bible) is that the mark had to be something easily identifiable, something probably on the face that would be an instant tell of who this person was.
I suspect it was the hook nose.
Cain's decendants were the Kenites. That is not easily seen in the English language due to the difference in spelling.
But in Hebrew, Cain is QYN, and Kenite is QYNY.
The Kenites mixed with the Canaanites, which were a people who were cursed.
They later mixed with the Esau, creating the Edomites.
The modern day jews are the Edomites of the Bible.
So, they have some Semitic blood through Esau, but they are not true Semites. They also have Satanic blood, as they are of Cain.
This is what Jesus was saying about them.
In Hebrew, "Satan" means "Adversary." It is not a little red guy with horns and a pitchfork. It is the adversary of the Israelites, which are the White Europeans and their descendents.
This explains why the jews have been causing trouble in White societies for thousands of years, being kicked out of 109 countries (White countries and kingdoms) over the past 1,000 years.
And they continue causing trouble in White society to this very day.
The jews infiltrated Christianity early on, and convinced true Christians that the jews were the Chosen, when clearly they cannot be, since they do NOTHING at all that would support such an idea.
God gave Abraham the covenant, which included (a) his seed would create many nations, (b) they would have many kings, and (c) be a blessing to the world.
That describes the White race. Whites have dominated the world with many nations, many kings, and been an overall blessing to the world, creating nearly all the inventions that have ever made life better for everyone.
Jews have never created a single nation (even the jewish Israeli state was not created by them), have had no kings, and have been a thorn in everyone's side, never a blessing.
The word "jew" was not in the Bible until a few centuries ago.
They changed "Judahite" in the OT to "jew." Judahite was a blood descendant of Judah, who was a son of Jacob/Israel. They were true Israelites.
They also changed "Judean" in the NT to "jew." A Judean was anyone, of any blood line and any race, who lived in the Roman province of Judea. It was a "diverse" society by the time of Jesus, which is why he preached to the "multitudes" at times. The multitudes was everyone, and not only the Israelites who still lived there.
But he specifically stated in the NT that he came NOT but for the LOST SHEEP of the House of Israel. The true Israelites (Whites who had mostly left the Levant by then), forgot who they were.
That is why Paul wrote his letters to his Israelite brothers who were living in Europe -- trying to wake them up to who they were.
None of his letters were ever sent to blacks, asians, or jews. Only to Whites living in Europe and extreme western Asia at that time.
Oh, of course---everybody lies. Why should you be any different? The Caucasian race (if you want to call it a race) originated near the Caucasus mountains. I assume predating the writing of the Bible. I have no problem with this.
You seem to have a reading comprehension problem.
I did not say the Caucasian race came from the Caucasus Mountains.
I said the Israelites migrated into those mountains and later came into Europe.
They were called "Caucasian" because they knew they came from that region, but did know their previous history before that. It was a label, and used for the White race.
Caucasoid (Caucasian) = White race of Europe, originally from the Levant and parts of Mesopotamia
Negroid = Black race of sub-Saharan Africa
Mongoloid = Yellow/Red race of Asia
You ain't black
The original Persians were White.
Then, the arabs moved in.
I don't see any significant difference between today's Iranians and any of today's other arabs.
So, I see no reason to consider them different from arab.
The existing Persians are white. It comes from being Caucasians (notice where that is, relative to Iran). They are more kin to Pakistani, than to Arabs, and the Pakistani are not Arabs at all. But they are akin to Europeans, which is how they pass. They were not always Muslim.
The vast majority of today's Persians are NOT White.
Not even close.
Many of them look closer to Indian, and almost all of them look arab.
They are a mixed race, there is no doubt about it.
Stop gas-lighting me, bro.
It doesn't work on me.
The Indians are Caucasians, especially in the north of India. Not Arab at all.
India has a very strong caste society.
You are at a social level based on who your parents are/were.
My understanding is that the very top of the caste system -- the ones who rule -- are White, or perhaps WERE White and by now are only partially White. They were called Aryan because of this.
It is not difficult to understand that some Whites migrated eastward into what is now India -- back in the day.
But the VAST majority of today's 1 billion Indians are NOT Caucasian (which is the White race).
If you can't tell that a red Indian is not a Caucasian, then I don't know what to tell you.
Maybe you drank the "race is a social construct" Kool-aid bullshit.
I hope you don't think pigeons are eagles, too.
"Kind after kind."
Not "kind from a different kind."
No such people as Palestinians or country as Palestine. Tell a lie a thousand times and people will believe it is true.
The 1947 legislation to create the modern day state of Israel was stated as a new government within Palestine.
Look at maps before 1947.
They say "Palestine" in that geographic region.
So yes, Palestine was/is a thing.
Of course, the US always vetoes any UN vote to "recognize" Palestine as a country, but that is just political theatrics, not reality.
Palestine was a geographic region which was part of the Ottoman Empire until the British took control after the end of WWI. It was NEVER a country.
Islam demands Al-Taqiyya is practiced against the infidel (and other islamic sects). the west is an infidel. there is a long history of Islam strictly practicing this belief to the death and dismemberment of the infidel. moral of the story- if you're and infidel, you can't believe what a mullah says. their book says to murder and kill the infidel. Israel is correct in their assessment in this matter- the rest have more experiences to come to aid in their wisdom.
Yeah, but the Talmud says the exact same thing about all non-jews.
you prove my point. team-satan is consistent. the talmud is the synagogue of satan.
You mean the Bible of Satan?
Talmud is the document that Talmudic Scholars study. (pretty sufe)
They have entire schools devoted to the Talmud, called "yeshiva."
Fair to say there are some genuine Jews. Most are the imposters-Synagogue of Satan that Jesus mentions. All the european jews that usurped Palestinian land to create Israel are imposters.
Most of the Palestinians are actually semitic people (decended from Shem).
No, they are arabs.
Yes, Shem was in their line, but they are from Ishmail, not Isaac.
They are "mixed" blood. That is what "arab" means in Hebrew.
They are not "semites" anymore because they are not of pure blood, once they race-mixed.
It is confusing because the fraudulent modern-day historians claim that "semite" has nothing to do with the Bible, but is anyone who spoke a semitic language.
Yes, everybody in that part of the world did speak a semitic language in those days, but that ignores the Bible's ancestry that is clearly laid out.
Modern day "scientists" and "historians" always dismiss any biblical reference, which is why they make that claim.
Iran has also financed attacks on American soldiers.
The IAEA as well as the effin UN has said Iran was breaking all nuclear agreements.
Not that I really care if they bomb Israel, but when people say 'death to America' I take them seriously. I don't think they just wanted to make glow in the dark watches...
Iranians also say, "Death to traffic," during traffic jams.
It might just be an idiom for some, though it could also be a real desire by others.
Regardless ...
Fuck Iran.
But double fuck the Israeli government in Palestine that fraudulently pretends to be the same as biblical Israel.
I’m guessing you’re a GWB fan as well.
Eeewwww no Bush's for me 🤮
Wot? You don't like baked beans?
He was baked, alright.
Israel has been warning about Iran's potential to develop nuclear weapons for over three decades, with predictions of Iran being "months away" from acquiring a nuclear bomb made repeatedly since the early 1990s.
its tiresome
especially since israel allegedly has nukes
and israels entire existence has been nothing but aggressive land theft
I believe Israel has nukes and has had them for some time. How could Israel have a "Samson Option" without nuclear weapons?
Some say nukes are a hoax
Like even Hiroshima and Nagaski
Idk. another rabbit hole
Yes indeed - I've heard the same. So many rabbit holes to go down - so little time! I'm 73 - I'm at the point in my life where I've concluded that most of what we have been taught regarding history (and probably science) is not true. So I try to have an open mind, research and look at the evidence. I want to go where ever truth takes me. But that's a great challenge most of the time.
There are as many rabbit holes as you like. Just take literally anything, and declare it's opposite is it's actual nature. Red is actually blue, but it's a secret. Apples are bananas and theres people with a code and a date in history that proves it. It will keep ya busy, that is for sure. Focused. With purpose. Fuck shared reality. Get a different belief system going, name it, and head up the river as Colonel Kurtz. We're havin' a good time!
love your outlook and attitude!
Those people didn't go to school and so physics are totally lost on them.
Q: do astronauts have to go “UP” to get to the moon?
40,000 ft view. Trump is remaking the whole Middle East.
But there bomb is almost ready…. Just 2 moar weeks !!!!!
Trying and building are two different levels of accomplishment. The fact of the matter is that the only purpose for highly-enriched uranium is the construction of a nuclear device. Even a nuclear device is not the end state. In order to drop the bombs on Japan, we had THREE secret programs. The Manhattan Project was only one of them (nuclear device). The other two were weapon design and fuzing, and the delivery system. It is a very grey scale.
If they were not trying to build a weapon, then why was Trump concerned with all the meetings with Iran in Qatar? It doesn't make sense!
I just do not believe our intelligence communities. It's impossible.
Someone's lying. Both can't be true.
First thoughts:
This attack was incredibly stupid. Trump should have immediately and harshly condemned Israel for the attack on false premises. He's not because he's preserving the illusion that the US will always back Israel. He believes he is doing this to prevent another Holocaust and to preserve a homeland for the Jews. In reality, his silence is doing more to jeopardize that homeland than to protect it. The Muslim world is on a knife's edge to crush these people right now, and honestly, I understand their perspective. America First means getting tf out of this conflict. Diplomacy only. Peace only. No weapons. No troops. No money. No "support."
Stop the damn fighting and failing that, stop our involvement in it.
As the story goes, all nations eventually turn against Israel.
When Israel is brought to its knees, Christ comes down to Earth to save Israel and takes all the good people back with him.
Not before the anti christ reveals itself, my bet is that the AC is Netanyahoo.
As the story goes, the Anti-Christ is supposed to be someone very similar to Christ himself.
A lot of people flock to the Anti-Christ thinking he is Christ.
The jewish state in the Middle East today calling itself "Israel" is an imposter.
It is NOT the Israel of the Bible.
God hates those people.
For as long as I can remember, Iran has been trying to build Nukes. So are they trying, or did they actually build a Nuke? Or is it a ruse and trap to put American lives in danger for the progressive militant left? Israel better watch out, they are quickly losing the support of the American people. and when that happens, you will be left out to dry.
They seem to be absolutely clueless about how soon that day might come.
Hopefully we wouldn’t be using solely Israeli intel to make this determination for ourselves?? Stupid
Not able to anymore anyway... And they won't be for some time..
What does "Building" mean?
Does it include creating the raw materials? Preparing dual purpose components! Buying components!
But that isn't to say that they weren't preparing all of the parts so that they could've easily assembled by...... Palestinians, antics soy boys, or Malaysian jihadists...
[Angry smallhat noises]
So why would Iran pursue nuclear anything, since they have enough oil to meet their energy needs for 1000 years?
72-hour rule on this one.
Oppps my bad “Quote Isreal”😱
US has known Iran was not the least bit interested in building nuclear weapons for the last 30 years. This is not secret among nations leaders.
We have been lied to about Iran nukes for most of our lives.
When weak look strong like the chihuahuas they are
Wait, so you're saying Israel lied? No way? Let me ask the crew of the USS Liberty their thoughts on this.
Israel is being worked into doing the dirty work of taking out the regime in Iran and then will be worked into potaotimg themselves. Hence why they are last.
Israel says, "Oops! My bad. Sorry about the mayhem. We'll be leaving now."
Maybe Saddom’s weapons of mass destruction are there, Israel hasn’t used that justification yet.
Fuck, this shit again?
Sure wink 😜