President Trump walks ahead of King Charles, breaking royal protocol. - LOL
(twitter.com)
— 𝓦𝓦𝓖1𝓦𝓖𝓐 —
Comments (87)
sorted by:
Symbolism. He's showing the world who is in charge.
Once the dust settles, Trump is going to be King of the World.
Yes, because America loves world government and kings. Totally not what we fought against to become a country.
Probably never will be publicly revealed. If we (anons) can't even figure out the mechanism, then normies would never believe it even if publicly explained in intricate detail.
As close as I can get is Supreme Allied Commander (military C-I-C) of Sovereign Alliance (similar to Eisenhower in WW2 minus attached POTUS role). But I think there is more given the possible attempt to make Obama 'King Regent' of UK on 22APR2016 (via MI-6 coup?): https://greatawakening.win/p/19Bt7AFiOn/something-happened-in-uk-22apr20/c/
Sometimes I wonder if it’s something as wild as “he has the Ark of the Covenant at Mar-a-Lago, and that’s not a replica.”
Highly dubious, I know. Way to verify would be checking possession against biblical procedure, which I highly doubt that one is in accordance with, but haven’t confirmed yet.
Way to verify would be to touch it and see if you survive. If you don't survive, it's the real deal.
I’ll let anybody else go first.
And I suspect only Jesus could survive that. Not even the High Priest was allowed to directly touch the Ark of the Covenant - the High Priest simply sprinkled blood on the four corners with a hyssop branch.
I like your line of thinking AmateurExpert lol.
However, according to countless hours of reading I've done on this topic, the arc itself is not always deadly upon touch.
It needs to have a certain substance placed inside it which then activates it making it deadly to touch.
Sort of like a "reactor" with the "special fuel" placed inside. It has also been called "the subtle essence of the Holy Spirit."
There are two types of "Heavenly Manna."
One is white. Anyone know what the color of the second, more powerful "Heavenly Manna" is?
Oh boy if the right people read my comment I could get in trouble lol.
"And behold; a bolt like unto an arrow, flew across the sky, charged with the power of the Sun..."
"The following 1895 article discusses the possibility that the Ark of the Covenant was actually a battery or an early form of the leyden jar."
https://strangeago.com/2019/11/08/ark-of-the-covenant-was-a-battery-leyden-jar/
"Any coroner’s jury of today, if it were to sit on an inquest over the body of Aaron’s sons, would at once bring a verdict or death by a discharge of electricity.
Aaron knew this power, and to make it effective all he had to do to deal death from his apparatus was to remove the costly camel’s hair carpets, which are almost perfect nonconductors of electricity, and make the culprit stand on terra firma. Death would result instantly by fire breaking out and leave no wounds or burns to account for his death. That several members of revolting tribes of Israelites were thus electrocuted is also a matter of record in the Bible."
Maybe that was what they were after during the raid. Not documents.
Oh come on. Nazi raiders would never try to take control of the Ark of the Covenant. That’s just silly talk.
Is that good?
Even better, it's Biblical.
Revelation chapter 12:
"And she gave birth to a male child, who would come to rule the nations with a rod of iron."
With revelations its the only future chapter in the Bible. The elites could follow revelations like a script if they wanted to. Use the secret society's to pass on the plan through generations to get to where we are right now.
Is she, "America"?
Antichrist?
Ah No. See my comment, below.
This is certainly a reference to Jesus, but there is a pattern in Revelation where a flashback to the past occurs to get a snapshot of the history, then it moves forward again. The second half of the verse, and the verse immediately following are:
and her child was caught up unto God, and to his throne.
And the woman fled into the wilderness, where she hath a place prepared of God, that they should feed her there a thousand two hundred and threescore days.
Because of the symbolism reflected from the OT, the woman has been interpreted by both Protestants and Catholics as Israel. The twelve stars ( See Revelation 12:1) are interpreted by Scripture to be a reference to Joseph's dream in Genesis 37:9
Jacob (Israel) picks up the reference, and responds:
Joseph is a foreshadowing of Jesus in some very real ways, though Jesus is born from the tribe of Judah, whose tribal flag included a lion.
"Current position" it appears. And we're good with what he's doing. 😎
+1 ULB 😎
But here's where I'll probably lose most of you…
Bear in mind I'm just repeating what White Hat time traveler 2036 John Titor said coyly in 2001 when he was asked:
"...when (Christ) does return, do you think He will be a Lamb or a Lion?"
Think on it a little…
Like many anons, I'm wondering what happened to the wars of 2005 and 2015 that John Titor predicted (or rather, spoke of in the past tense). If he was wrong about two things as massive as a civil war and WW3, then what is the basis for further reliance on his writings
I'll take a wild guess that this has come up before - what do you think of it
According to him, that was his timeline, not ours.
I can't make sense of that but it's OK - bet I'm not the only one :)
Given what's coming out on what's been done to the children, I'll take the "Chronicles of Narnia" theme for $200, JT.
I'm just "unthawing" as many frozen troops as possible by simply whispering into their ear.
Good analogy. I like it.
Could he be, the Messiah? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-gHVHQeYSi0
Or the Anti -Christ? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H041AJDrsFI
Personally, I don't think Trump is either / or. I neither think Trump is the Messiah nor the Anti-Christ. But the Anti -Christ will come first....
The antichrist has been here since the founding of the Roman Catholic Church. Dig deeper and you'll see it if only if you go by Jesus' words: "for MANY will come in my name saying 'I am the Christ' and will deceive many, even my elect."
According to Catholic doctrine, "the pope is Christ on earth until Christ returns."
if you disagree with the above statement then all that means is that you have not looked into the Catholic church's own doctrine.
As someone who leans toward the Reformed view, I agree. The pope has been called an/or the Anti-Christ since the beginning of the Reformation. Who is the Anti - Christ finally? I don't know. I may be wrong, but I see the papal role as being more indicative of the False Prophet - and a world leader he supports as the Anti -Christ.
Hey PRP I always love it when you stop by and comment.
Could you please site the verse where there is a distinction between false prophet and antichrist? I can't find anything
The Second Coming of Christ:
11 Now I saw heaven opened, and behold, a white horse. And He who sat on him was called Faithful and True, and in righteousness He judges and makes war. 12 His eyes were like a flame of fire, and on His head were many crowns. He [a]had a name written that no one knew except Himself. 13 He was clothed with a robe dipped in blood, and His name is called The Word of God. 14 And the armies in heaven, clothed in [b]fine linen, white and clean, followed Him on white horses. 15 Now out of His mouth goes a [c]sharp sword, that with it He should strike the nations. And He Himself will rule them with a rod of iron. He Himself treads the winepress of the fierceness and wrath of Almighty God. 16 And He has on His robe and on His thigh a name written:
KING OF KINGS AND LORD OF LORDS.
Upvoted, despite many anons not realizing you were speaking metaphorically since, you know, the entire planet isn't ruled by a king
AI reply to question about protocol being broken.
Yes, the statement is true in the context of traditional royal protocol, and protocol was indeed broken during this event.
During state visits to the United Kingdom, it is customary for the host monarch, in this case King Charles, to lead the procession, especially during formal ceremonies such as the inspection of troops or walking through a guard of honor. The video shows Donald Trump walking ahead of King Charles, which deviates from this protocol. This action has been noted in previous instances involving Trump, such as during his 2019 visit when he walked in front of Queen Elizabeth II, leading to similar criticisms.
The breach of protocol during this 2025 state visit at Windsor Castle is consistent with reports and observations from royal correspondents and media outlets, which have highlighted such deviations as significant departures from established customs. This incident underscores the ongoing tension between traditional royal etiquette and the informal style often associated with Trump's public appearances.
First thought is "Oh, that is NOT a deviation in protocol. Protocol was followed exactly." Who is in charge is not who you expected. Did you notice the conversation with the Guardsman in charge? And the fact that he saluted Trump in front of Charles.
All Saudi generals saluted Trump directly a few months back. He appears to be C-I-C of US Republic (emphasized 14JUN25), Saudi, UAE, Qatar, and UK (witnessed so far). Points to "Supreme Allied Commander" of a Sovereign Alliance, imo.
Not "informal style". It is intentional exertion of dominance with reciprocal submissive response. Yes, even lizards can be submissive. /s
Rather than a tension between the traditional and the modern, it is wholly traditional, formal and sends a clear signal.
Trump is in charge here.
Biden and Macron walked in front of Charles too! Cuz Trump changed their status in his first term, just before he left, with the football.
In actual fact, the correct Royal protocol on a state visit like this, is for the visiting dignitary to walk in front of the King or Queen. This was the same as what Macron did a few weeks a go when he walked in front of King Charles. No symbolism. It's the correct protocol.
I do not think this is correct. Do you have any evidence for this? In the UK no one, ever, walks in front of the monarch. That's why it was such a big deal... and to salute a different head of state and ignore your countries monarch? No, this is not how it is done. Sources, please.
Evidence is "They do it every single time a visiting head of state is present."
That's the evidence.
People on here constantly want to believe in their king Trump. Im a Trump supporter, but this fantasy they are living in on here is getting out of control.
Just because Trump with his large family of successors would be, inarguably, fucking IDEAL king material, that doesn't mean it's ideal for the US. We don't do kings. Everyone here knows that, whether you think we do or not.
People just appreciate Trump and honor him for his superhuman sacrifice and effectiveness. He's the most consequential president in history, but he neither wants to nor can be nor should be nor is viewed as king.
Anons are not living in a "fantasy" FFS. Let their praise of Trump roll off your back; most of them love Jesus more and regard him as actual king of the world.
They did this for Biden too. https://x.com/chatnewshub/status/1968287231367676044?s=46&t=xm_WTjP7jiCIAfJFvtNIbQ
Macron did it too
Just like the Queen. He walked in front of her too. Trump owns them.
Didn’t Macron do the same thing.
YES because the visiting head of state is invited to walk ahead to inspect the troops.
It's normal.
People here are not understanding what they are seeing.
Do you have this written anywhere?
Why did no one bring this up back in 2019?
Our great POTUS is at it again!!!
I wonder how the "No Kings" liberals feel about b this and the fact that he did the same to the queen...
whos yo daddy
Looks to me like that Royal Guard is reporting to the guy who can get things done.
Kek
I love it-HE is the boss😁✝️
Is this like with the Demon Queen mother who waved him ahead?
That was not the "queen mother." That was Queen Elizabeth II who waved Trump ahead because he was a visiting head of state and she was inviting him to inspect the troops.
Charles did the same thing today.
It's normal.
Not at all normal. Yes the Queen did wave him ahead and made it clear he was in the lead with her "go ahead". It was not normal. It caused a big to do here and in the UK at the time for being wildly against protocol. It was covered in the media, and is easy to find.
Thank you! Can you provide sauce?
he did it to the queen too...is it due to ending the corporation and Britain no longer in control of US???
He's having the time of his life
President Trump told Chuck before the review of the troops that Chuck WILL be taking a secondary position for the review. I don't think Chuck was too happy, but what's he gonna do? He cannot say no and have America pull every single ounce of support from the island and have the Africans and Hindus walk over his country with no consequences. Chuck is stuck between a rock and a hard place with PDJT.He plays President Trump's tune or "the City of London's" tune. Who does he NEED more? Trump of course. All the City of London can do is cause pain and misery for him because they don't want capitalism to succeed. They are destroyers while Trump is a builder.
No confirmed sauce on this yet, but suspected is "coup on the coup". Obama/MI-6 ran coup on Windsors on 22APR2016. Trump/military took DC and all attached CORPs (parts of Commonwealth like Canada CORP) on 20JAN2017, then proceeded to coup Obama/MI-6 (probably via capture of George HW Bush Sr. position 2017-2018, key date 30NOV2018), and place Trump as 'King Regent' of Windsors. Obama claim was UK citizenship (royal colony of Kenya). Trump claim is via Scottish mother? or possibly via marriage to Melania as 'royal cousin'? Or both.
Fingerprints of a coup 22APR16? https://greatawakening.win/p/19Bt7AFiOn/something-happened-in-uk-22apr20/c/
Didnt they claim he did this with the queen back in the day? And it was because she asked him to go ahead of her? Either this is the same thing orrrrrrr, hes doing a similar setup but sending a message we are back in front reguardless of where we are at right now we have leadership with is helping restore our nation for the first time in decades IMHO
Hey Grok, "What is the royal protocol for visiting heads of state? Do visitors walk in front of the king of England?"
Royal Protocol and Walking in Front of the King During Ceremonial Inspections To address your question directly: Yes, both Donald Trump and Joe Biden have walked in front of King Charles III during formal ceremonial events, such as inspections of the Guard of Honour. This is not a breach of protocol but rather standard practice for visiting heads of state, as confirmed by Buckingham Palace sources and royal experts. The tradition allows the guest (in this case, the U.S. President as head of state) to lead during these specific moments to symbolize equality and honor the visitor, while the King, as host, follows or walks alongside. Below, I'll break it down with details from their respective meetings.
Complete Sauce Here
Uhhhgain
Still.
No No No
Watch the entire video. Charles clearly waves Trump ahead of him.
That's because Trump is the visiting head of state and is being invited to inspect the troops.
Exactly the same thing happened back when Trump visited Queen Elizabeth and she also waved him ahead of her to inspect the troops.
He did not barge ahead or break protocol in any way.
This is simply how it's done.
“Houses are actually made of polyester and lima beans.”
“They just are, they’re made of polyester and lima beans.”
“No really, houses are really only made of polyester and lima beans.”
Without receipts, the claim can be repeated all day, and not accepted, nor should it be. This isn’t intended as mockery, just demonstrating the ineffectiveness of simply repeating onesself.
To your benefit, I haven’t seen sauce for the claim that this ISN’T protocol, either, so neither claim is verified. Nice work pointing that out! Also, and you’ll see me do this a good bit, as notifications only alert the immediate reply, it’s easier to respond to multiple people by tagging them to a single response with u/[username]. o7
Does anyone have actual sauce on the protocol? I found this page, but it’s only available back to 2023. https://web.archive.org/web/20231001000000*/https://www.royal.uk/what-is-a-state-visit
No idea what it might be for the Sauds. Do they even publicly document their codes? In English? Do the Windsors do it either? u/MemeToDeath2021
Follow along like a good puppy and Daddy might not piss on your back.
Because he's the boss!
u/#kek
Biden walked in front too.
u/#trumptank
He did the same with Queen Elizabeth.
I was wondering if this would happen yesterday when they announced AF1 landed in the UK.
Could POTUS actually be showing that Charles is illegitimate?
Biden walked in front, macron walked in front….
President Trump is significantly more powerful than the useless royal family that allowed the takeover of their country by muslims. Of course President Trump should walk in front of him.
Just like he did on the Queen. NCSWIC