I don’t think any national guard troops will want to engage US Marines in defiance of federal law. This absolutely sounds like a trigger to invoke the Insurrection Act. They are making it an easy call.
If they think they will have endless riots like with George Floyd, they obvious do not understand this President.
You are correct! Let Walz order the NG against ICE. The NG turns back on Walz, Trump calls the Insurrection Act, Trump arrests thee entire Walz Admin, Trump then uses it to take down every blue-state idiot admin, call the Commie DemoLibs done for good!
This woman getting shot is probably going to the political left's Reichstag fire, or at least they hope it will be. They probably think they can have endless riots to distract from the little fraud problem they have.
All POTUS has to do is Nationalize the Minnesota NG and order them to stand down. And, Walz can’t do a thing about it.
If I remember correctly, the recent SCOTUS ruling confirmed he can Nationalize a State’s NG, he just can’t deploy them without concurrence from the Governor, or without invoking the Insurrection Act.
Dumb question here, but doesn't the National Guard "report" to the Nation's leader regardless of their state affiliation? So they get their orders from, say, a President, before they get their orders from a Governor?
Weirdly the National Guard is controlled by each state unless they are Nationalized. The Reserves, on the other hand, report up through the Federal chain of command.
Precedence:
Yes, the Alabama National Guard was federalized and deployed to enforce school integration in Alabama during the early 1960s, overriding protests and resistance from Governor George Wallace.
Key Events
The most famous incident was the “Stand in the Schoolhouse Door” on June 11, 1963, at the University of Alabama in Tuscaloosa. Governor Wallace physically stood in the doorway of Foster Auditorium to symbolically block two African American students, Vivian Malone and James Hood, from registering, fulfilling his campaign promise of “segregation now, segregation tomorrow, segregation forever.” In response, President John F. Kennedy issued Executive Order 11111, federalizing the Alabama National Guard. Guardsmen, under federal command, escorted the students and ordered Wallace to step aside (led by General Henry Graham, who saluted Wallace and said it was his “sad duty” to ask him to move under presidential orders). Wallace eventually stepped aside, and the students enrolled without violence.
This was not an isolated case:
• In September 1963, Wallace deployed state-controlled Alabama National Guard troops to prevent integration at several public schools, including Tuskegee High School and schools in Birmingham, Huntsville, and Mobile.
• President Kennedy again federalized the Guard (via Executive Order 11118 on September 10, 1963), removing it from Wallace’s control and deploying it to enforce federal court orders allowing Black students to attend previously all-white schools.
These actions followed the 1954 Supreme Court ruling in Brown v. Board of Education, which declared school segregation unconstitutional, and built on similar federal interventions (e.g., President Eisenhower federalizing the Arkansas National Guard in 1957 for Little Rock). The federalization ensured compliance with court orders over state resistance, marking a key victory for the Civil Rights Movement in Alabama, the last state to begin meaningful school desegregation.
Not going to happen. Governor retard fails to realize Trump has feredalized the national guard. They're under federal control not state. Eat a dick Governor retard.
So if they call in the national guard, who are they defending? Isn't it weird or concerning that Walz would call them in if they are on the right side?
Fort Sumter, if the South had not fired the first shot, but had several States simply seceded without firing a shot, they might have gone their ways, or could have won. Virginia did not secede until after Ft. Sumter was taken & Lincoln called for troops. Then Virginia, Tenn., Ark. & NC voted to leave.
Minnesota Walz seems to be making the mistakes of the South. When Minnesota is freed, it will be so nice.
thanks, I am concerned how my retired Minnesota cousin will be feeling, she is not woke socialist, but not MAGA either, will talk with her in a couple of weeks, but there might be an opening to talk with her that peace will be restored through this process
It's all bluff and bullshit. No one in the NG is going to be shooting at federal agents to protect illegals. The second Tampon Timmy issues that order it now becomes treason.
It's ridiculous to even repeat this claim, in my view. It will never, could never happen.
No, it would not be legal for a state governor to mobilize the National Guard (as opposed to a separate state defense force) to actively resist or obstruct the federal government in enforcing valid federal laws, such as immigration enforcement.
Key Legal Principles
Supremacy Clause (Article VI, Clause 2 of the U.S. Constitution): Federal law is the "supreme Law of the Land," and states cannot interfere with its execution. Immigration is an exclusively federal domain, so state actions obstructing federal agents (e.g., ICE) would violate this clause.
National Guard's Dual Role: The National Guard operates under state control in "State Active Duty" or "Title 32" status (governor commands, often federally funded for support roles). However, it is also a federal reserve force. The president can federalize it under statutes like 10 U.S.C. § 12406 (to execute laws, suppress rebellion, etc.) or the Insurrection Act (10 U.S.C. §§ 251–255), transferring command to the president, often without governor consent in cases of obstruction or rebellion.
Limits on State Authority: While governors control the Guard by default, they cannot use it to oppose federal authority. State officials cannot legally interfere with federal law enforcement. Deploying the Guard to block federal agents would constitute obstruction of federal law, potentially rising to rebellion or insurrection.
Practical Outcomes in the Hypothetical
If the governor mobilizes the Guard under state control to resist (e.g., to "protect" locals from federal raids), the president could federalize the units, placing them under federal command. Guard members, as military personnel, would follow lawful federal orders.
Active resistance (e.g., Guard troops confronting federal agents) would likely trigger the Insurrection Act, allowing deployment of federal troops or federalized Guard to suppress the obstruction.
Troops are unlikely to side against the federal government en masse; refusal could lead to court-martial under the Uniform Code of Military Justice.
Historical Precedents
No modern examples exist of a state successfully using the National Guard to oppose federal enforcement:
Desegregation Cases (1950s–1960s) — Governors (e.g., Orval Faubus in Arkansas, George Wallace in Alabama) initially deployed state Guard to block federal court orders. Presidents Eisenhower and Kennedy federalized the Guard, reversing its role to enforce federal law.
Other Cases — Attempts to withhold Guard for foreign deployments (e.g., 1980s Central America training) failed; courts upheld federal authority (e.g., Perpich v. Department of Defense, 1990, affirming congressional power over the militia).
Recent parallels (e.g., debates over border deployments) show governors can refuse cooperative Title 32 missions but cannot block federalization for law execution.
In summary, while a governor could mobilize the Guard for state purposes (e.g., maintaining local order), using it to resist federal law enforcement would be unconstitutional and ineffective, as federal authority prevails via the Supremacy Clause and federalization powers. This aligns with longstanding precedent protecting federal enforcement from state interference.
I don’t think any national guard troops will want to engage US Marines in defiance of federal law. This absolutely sounds like a trigger to invoke the Insurrection Act. They are making it an easy call.
If they think they will have endless riots like with George Floyd, they obvious do not understand this President.
You are correct! Let Walz order the NG against ICE. The NG turns back on Walz, Trump calls the Insurrection Act, Trump arrests thee entire Walz Admin, Trump then uses it to take down every blue-state idiot admin, call the Commie DemoLibs done for good!
This is pharmalogical grade hopium! Let's roll!
Let it be so!
Happy days! 🎉
This woman getting shot is probably going to the political left's Reichstag fire, or at least they hope it will be. They probably think they can have endless riots to distract from the little fraud problem they have.
Imagine they george ffoyd her and the truth comes out after they set their torches ablaze.
Agreed doug!
George Floyd occurred during Trump and he let the states handle it as he mocked them for not letting him send the troops in.
He's too dumb to realize he shouldn't be saying the things he is saying.
I won't get in his way.
Yep! Why stop an enemy when they’re busy destroying themselves.
All POTUS has to do is Nationalize the Minnesota NG and order them to stand down. And, Walz can’t do a thing about it.
If I remember correctly, the recent SCOTUS ruling confirmed he can Nationalize a State’s NG, he just can’t deploy them without concurrence from the Governor, or without invoking the Insurrection Act.
Dumb question here, but doesn't the National Guard "report" to the Nation's leader regardless of their state affiliation? So they get their orders from, say, a President, before they get their orders from a Governor?
Weirdly the National Guard is controlled by each state unless they are Nationalized. The Reserves, on the other hand, report up through the Federal chain of command.
Precedence: Yes, the Alabama National Guard was federalized and deployed to enforce school integration in Alabama during the early 1960s, overriding protests and resistance from Governor George Wallace. Key Events The most famous incident was the “Stand in the Schoolhouse Door” on June 11, 1963, at the University of Alabama in Tuscaloosa. Governor Wallace physically stood in the doorway of Foster Auditorium to symbolically block two African American students, Vivian Malone and James Hood, from registering, fulfilling his campaign promise of “segregation now, segregation tomorrow, segregation forever.” In response, President John F. Kennedy issued Executive Order 11111, federalizing the Alabama National Guard. Guardsmen, under federal command, escorted the students and ordered Wallace to step aside (led by General Henry Graham, who saluted Wallace and said it was his “sad duty” to ask him to move under presidential orders). Wallace eventually stepped aside, and the students enrolled without violence. This was not an isolated case: • In September 1963, Wallace deployed state-controlled Alabama National Guard troops to prevent integration at several public schools, including Tuskegee High School and schools in Birmingham, Huntsville, and Mobile. • President Kennedy again federalized the Guard (via Executive Order 11118 on September 10, 1963), removing it from Wallace’s control and deploying it to enforce federal court orders allowing Black students to attend previously all-white schools. These actions followed the 1954 Supreme Court ruling in Brown v. Board of Education, which declared school segregation unconstitutional, and built on similar federal interventions (e.g., President Eisenhower federalizing the Arkansas National Guard in 1957 for Little Rock). The federalization ensured compliance with court orders over state resistance, marking a key victory for the Civil Rights Movement in Alabama, the last state to begin meaningful school desegregation.
So, the NG has been federalized before.
The probability of Walz getting grabbed in the middle of the night by our boys, increasing by the hour!!!
u/#WaaahCat
PLEASE rug pull this piss ant!!!
u/#waaahcat
u/#WoahCat
Why are the GIFs blank?
Only some are...
Via the great community styling inconvenience of January 2026...
Yes it is a hit or miss.
Spicy thoughts...
u/#spicy
The Soldiers that he thinks he owns know better...
Liberal/communism must be crushed and the treasonous leaders like soros,obama,clinton,schumer,pelosi,etc.(MSM) must be put in GITMO Now.
Don’t forget Bush, McConnell and more
Yes but the criminal 'uni-party/deep state' is not the same as the obama liberal/communist COUP against Everything American.
MN NG is not going to listen to him
he's out. Trump is king now
Not going to happen. Governor retard fails to realize Trump has feredalized the national guard. They're under federal control not state. Eat a dick Governor retard.
Sauce? I'm not saying you're wrong. I'm just asking you to prove it for everyone's sake here. Thanks.
You federalize a Guard by state - not en masse , and I don't think MN's Guard has been yet.
Doesn't matter what the gov does. All Trump needs to do is Federalize the NG putting them under control of the CIC.
Q-post 572:
The shot heard around the world.
Possibly the one. 😉
THE SHOT HEARD AROUND THE WORLD. THE GREAT AWAKENING. A WEEK TO REMEMBER. Q ✨
u/#q572
Thanks! I see the Q post command is working again. Finally!
YES!! 🎉
It's my favorite feature & a mod taught me! 🫡
I check social media DAILY (multiple times daily) just on the off chance it'll be posted. I dont want to miss it lol
Clandestine isn't exaggerating when he compares this to Fort Sumter.
I don't know how Tiny Tim thinks he can get away with this nonsense without consequences. "Protect Minnesota," my ass!
https://nitter.poast.org/WarClandestine/status/2009019267191345220?s=20
They have their martyr now. Let the riots begin. They want a civil war to keep Trump administration from investigating them.
The nice they start rioting Trump will call it an insurrection and bring in the military. Clean and swift.
"Mostly peaceful"?
I think it all comes down to division. Trump knows the crimes already. Television and MSM has such a grasp on the left still
So if they call in the national guard, who are they defending? Isn't it weird or concerning that Walz would call them in if they are on the right side?
In retrospect, we should have seen this coming from the moment he took his official governor’s portrait.
https://files.catbox.moe/bkcyp6.png
u/libtards_r_stoopid is he your cousin by any chance?
Kek! 😹
Riot season came early this year
Lotta folx still have their Venezuela decorations up.
Retard.
How EXACTLY is that going to work? Trump is still CIC over entire military. Is Walz trying to pit US service members against the fed govt?
Walz is flat wrong for that
Democrats have been wanting the chaos of a civil war to deflect from their crimes for a long time.
Fort Sumter, if the South had not fired the first shot, but had several States simply seceded without firing a shot, they might have gone their ways, or could have won. Virginia did not secede until after Ft. Sumter was taken & Lincoln called for troops. Then Virginia, Tenn., Ark. & NC voted to leave.
Minnesota Walz seems to be making the mistakes of the South. When Minnesota is freed, it will be so nice.
Well said fren!
thanks, I am concerned how my retired Minnesota cousin will be feeling, she is not woke socialist, but not MAGA either, will talk with her in a couple of weeks, but there might be an opening to talk with her that peace will be restored through this process
Will pray that you can comfort her... that's why we're here..🙏🤍
thanks, she will feel good knowing Americans are praying
Yes, we are in Revival worldwide! 🙌
If he wants the second part of FAFO, the same units who took Maduro last week would be more then happy to show him.
I see this as an act of desperation...
Maybe Elmer Fudd is getting death threats from his handlers, and that's why he does what he does.
If this is war, I am more than willing to fight, like many more patriots. Lets hope not but we must do our duty, IF CALLED.
Correction:
walz - a satanic communist pedophile - is deploying national guard troops to defend illegally present criminal NON-citizens.
Waltz is playing his part in his movie.
It's all bluff and bullshit. No one in the NG is going to be shooting at federal agents to protect illegals. The second Tampon Timmy issues that order it now becomes treason.
The problem with his theory is that the ICE agents are not rogue. They are acting within the law and their chain of command. It is Walz who is rogue.
Of course...he's a lying evil POS
It’s a movie. Nothing will happen to him
Ya shure...he's doing that....
This is a tempest in a teapot.
It's ridiculous to even repeat this claim, in my view. It will never, could never happen.
No, it would not be legal for a state governor to mobilize the National Guard (as opposed to a separate state defense force) to actively resist or obstruct the federal government in enforcing valid federal laws, such as immigration enforcement.
Key Legal Principles
Practical Outcomes in the Hypothetical
Historical Precedents
No modern examples exist of a state successfully using the National Guard to oppose federal enforcement:
In summary, while a governor could mobilize the Guard for state purposes (e.g., maintaining local order), using it to resist federal law enforcement would be unconstitutional and ineffective, as federal authority prevails via the Supremacy Clause and federalization powers. This aligns with longstanding precedent protecting federal enforcement from state interference.
He's been put into submission, and is doing what he's told for the theatre. Optics to invoke the insurrection act.
That was my first thought fren...