472
Comments (110)
sorted by:
94
larrythepatriot 94 points ago +95 / -1

Also had protesters ready and signs on standby. Definitely planned. Expelling ammo?

24
deleted 24 points ago +25 / -1
39
Bedminster 39 points ago +39 / -0

All professionally made.

28
judypatriot 28 points ago +28 / -0

Honestly, abortion signs are one of the integral part of their protests always. So, having pre-mades on hand doesn't stand out too much to me.

However, registering the event 2 weeks prior.........suspicious.

16
What-Me-Worry 16 points ago +16 / -0

You forgot the bricks.

Having pallets of bricks randomly delivered to street corners is explained in the Constitution. Something something ... protest.

7
dandy_wieners 7 points ago +7 / -0

Mason stonecutter yadda yadda yadda bricks etc

2
Gaterop 2 points ago +2 / -0

They probably have a warehouse full of the signs somewhere 🤣

0
NeuroticFisherman 0 points ago +2 / -2

Everyone knew the court was taking on this case, and is going to announce a decision soon. The oral arguments would have been like a couple months ago probably. It's the typical schedule of the supreme court. With the current makeup of the court being 6/3 with a conservative majority, it wasn't hard to predict that this supreme court decision would in fact go this way. There's nothing suspicious about registering this website two weeks ago. Abortion activists would be watching all this from before getting to the supreme court continuing on. They'd be preparing for a decision against their viewpoints because of the current court makeup, whether they're corrupted or not, due to the big conservative majority. This post is basically a nothingburger, and is obvious to anyone who's been paying attention to the issue the last few months.

22
anotherdream 22 points ago +22 / -0

This is shit that has been in plain view for years but the uninitiated couldn't see. - Astroturf. - Look back at so much of the "outrage" and you'll see the same pattern. Websites ready to go, professionally printed messaging, coordinated press releases, etc etc. -

14
VaccinesCauseSIDS 14 points ago +14 / -0

This is a threat to our democracy!

7
Dashmoomoo 7 points ago +7 / -0

This is a threat to our democracy!

3
VaccinesCauseSIDS 3 points ago +3 / -0

I AM A MAN

7
brxn 7 points ago +7 / -0

You should still get a pregnancy test tho

2
schiff_for_brains 2 points ago +2 / -0

You can have signs by tomorrow. There's even a company literally named Signs by Tomorrow.

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
3
VaccinesCauseSIDS 3 points ago +3 / -0

Its a smart move tbh. They can get twice the bang for the buck on this news story.

Im wondering if they are willing to pull a fast one, have a conservative justice get hit by a car, and new justice is already set to go, and while Breyer is still on the bench

2
SuckaFree 2 points ago +2 / -0

Time to inform the Normies and Sheeple and expose [them] all over social media.

2
Moose_Antlers 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'm less concerned with the signs. They're quick to make and frankly I think the kind of people who'd show up to scream at the SCOTUS 30 min after such a leak are the kind of professionals who'd show up on command to just about any activist effort the Left put out. They're the professional activists, the ones with all the signs, the ones who make extra signs to hand out to people who just showed up, the people who show up with gas masks, milk for tear gas, etc in backpacks for a "peaceful protest."

These are the professional agitators who set the nation on fire in the summer of 2020 for Antifa and BLM. They'd damn well do it again over abortion or gay people or trannies or really any excuse really.

21
BabylonNTing 21 points ago +29 / -8

Someone already posted this an hour ago... 🥱

https://greatawakening.win/p/15Hc8Ny0dt/interdasting/c/

Maybe delete this and sticky their post instead?

24
catsfive [M] [S] 24 points ago +33 / -9

Yes. Dude. Title. Be descriptive. I couldn't find it. I'd have stickied it otherwise. Sorry. Thanks for understanding.

12
BabylonNTing 12 points ago +13 / -1

There is a pic of it next to title post where the OP has 31 likes and put forth the effort to verify ICANN using a command line prompt.

7
Professor_Chaos 7 points ago +11 / -4

And? Its title isn't helpful whatsoever.

4
BabylonNTing 4 points ago +5 / -1

Titles are used to hook a reader into reading something, well that’s what I learned in school anyways.

8
Professor_Chaos 8 points ago +9 / -1

"Interdasting" isn't going to cut it lol

-1
BabylonNTing -1 points ago +2 / -3

I dont know how old your device is, but on mine I can open picture up just by simply clicking it before opening post and going into thread. There is a camera icon to let user know its a pic post.

The title was perfect, pic was interdasting, and went to comment section where OP posted a pic of the command line prompt demonstrating that this could be verified. The title was perfect because high effort was used to create a quality post.

6
Deadaim6 6 points ago +6 / -0

1 word titles with no substance usually get scrolled past. I click on the thumbnails, but a title that gives a rough idea of the contents or poses a question are what get me to click if the picture isn't enough (or won't load).

Obviously not trying to be hard on you, just want to let you know how I look at it.

0
Professor_Chaos 0 points ago +1 / -1

We'll disagree, if even just for our visually impaired users.

3
MAGAdeburger 3 points ago +3 / -0

The post picture however, is...

5
YellowEye 5 points ago +5 / -0

Interdasting..

1
BabylonNTing 1 point ago +1 / -0

I know right?

8
NOTWOKE 8 points ago +10 / -2

Keep doing what your doing. Can't please everyone.

4
PepeSee 4 points ago +4 / -0

No need to be sorry. I often skip clickbaity but meaningless stuff unless a) it looks potential somehow/has lots of likes/etc or b) I'm bored and say what the hell. It's right in teh sidebar....

21
CQVFEFE 21 points ago +21 / -0

our larger Q board

WTF???

7
gb1787 7 points ago +7 / -0

Exactly. They hate Q over there.

5
45-4KAG 5 points ago +5 / -0

It's funny! My husband hangs out over there. Used to dismiss Q and called me a qtard (affectionately...I think...hahaha!) for hanging out here.

Except he learned about Pizzagate, Disney groomers, and other stuff that is linked to Q over there. He didn't even know a lot of stuff he's learned came from Q.

He now comes and visits us over here every once in a while because he says PW is all doom and gloom and we're happier and give him hope. He's even started thinking Q might be real and been reevaluating a lot lately. If only others over there knew where their facts come from...

3
CQVFEFE 3 points ago +3 / -0

The other board is not a larger Q board, or any kind of Q board. It is a larger TRUMP board. (Hence the "WTF??" :) They still openly mock Q and us diehard American patriots who study his posts, relate them to the Law of War Manual, etc. Which is fine for now, they'll all flip later.

I mean....at some point denying the reality of Q is like being run over by a truck, and then insisting the tire tracks across your back are there merely by coincidence.

My favorite Q proof is still the trip code zero delta one

On the 4chan/8chan/8kun boards where Q posted, each user, to remain anonymous, is assigned a randomly generated code made up of TEN CHARACTERS (numbers, upper and lowercase letters, and punctuation) as their identifying username

Try to imagine how many random 10-character codes there could be, with over 70 characters to choose from

On the day Q changed his trip code and posted the new one, TEN SECONDS LATER President Trump also JUST HAPPENED to post on social media (Twitter)

Within the text of the tweet, he JUST HAPPENED to use ALL TEN EXACT CHARACTERS found in Q's trip code—including both exclamation points and all the upper- and lowercase letters and digits—with the exception of one (please be sitting down):

The letter q.

Every autist and anon who was tracking Q at the time can verify and vouch for this fact. You cannot make this up, and anyone claiming this is coincidence is either deliberately lying or an idiot

3
KAYDEE123 3 points ago +3 / -0

there's a thousand proofs like this. one "proof" I saw here was someone posted a pic of Scavino posting, and he had to delete and repost twice to get the timing right so it coordinated with a Qpost. if that isn't proof I don't know what is.

2
queue-anon 2 points ago +2 / -0

Would love a graphic of that!

1
45-4KAG 1 point ago +1 / -0

Forgot to mention...

The "WTF". They spread Q information and don't even realize it. In that sense, they're a Trump board and almost a Q board but in denial. 😂

1
45-4KAG 1 point ago +1 / -0

That's pretty awesome! I vaguely remember reading about it. The missile incident was a big one for me. Terrifying.

I haven't been following Q that long. I got on TDW around the stolen election because of my husband and everything with TW on Reddit, then came over here after the fake insurrection. I watched live streams that day of people in the capitol building from links posted on TDW. And it ended up being antifa... They were making fun of MAGA and how they baited a bunch of Trump supporters in the comments. I never looked back at TDW because it's compromised. I kick myself for not recording anything.

People like my husband only heard about QAnon from MSM and associate Q with that crazy guy who killed people and that horned guy, and aren't even willing to look into it themselves. Exactly what the MSM wants. I came in sceptical with an open mind, and the more and more I see...it can't be coincidence.

2
CQVFEFE 2 points ago +2 / -0

The horned guy was proven to be antifa.

1
45-4KAG 1 point ago +1 / -0

Wasn't someone claiming to be his sister also saying he was a glowie?

3
Dashmoomoo 3 points ago +3 / -0

Show him the tippy top proof !

2
AReckoningIsComing 2 points ago +2 / -0

Me too. Thought Q was nuts til Donald.win went doomer central and found Hopium in this place after Jan 6. Never looked back.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
16
Perrin 16 points ago +16 / -0

It wasn't exactly a secret that a majority conservative court would redress this issue

4
Voteordie 4 points ago +5 / -1

Yeah… its been pretty clear for months(?) that the law would be shot down in some way.

6
EstebanVargas69 6 points ago +6 / -0

It’s not the judiciary’s purview to create law. This unconstitutional order like so many others were and are illegal. The court knows this and the courts know the people are dumb enough not to know this. The dept of education is clearly the biggest impediment to having an informed citizenry, as history outright proves. It’s simply a means to keep the retards divided over things that have little to no bearing over our everyday lives.

3
catbertz 3 points ago +3 / -0

Agreed. Everyone knew the court was working on this case, and a decision was likely in the near future. The only thing new was the leak, which is probably many to pressure weak justices to change their opinions.

15
anonleo1579 15 points ago +15 / -0

Might be a white hat ploy imho. All boxes, except civil unrest, are ticked for the military to step in.

All branches of power are broken; if the election was a sting the trap will snap right about now. There are no more civic mechanics to repair the situation.

3
GodBlessTheUSA22 3 points ago +3 / -0

I agree!!! Especially if everything is already wrapped up and we are watching a movie.

3
SoMuchWinning45 3 points ago +3 / -0

We had civil unrest a few years ago, costing a couple lives and billions of dollars of damage.

3
anonleo1579 3 points ago +3 / -0

True except the SCOTUS thing didn’t happen yet.

9
CQVFEFE 9 points ago +9 / -0

You gotta love

How they always think no one will ever find out about this stuff

Or think no one will care, or that they'll get away with it anyway

WE ARE THE NEWS NOW

8
PeaceAndLovePatriot 8 points ago +9 / -1

It's always [them]

1
inquimous 1 point ago +4 / -3

If you read this link, https://blogs.timesofisrael.com/judaism-is-pro-life-and-all-jews-should-be-pro-life/, it isn't a Jewish value at all.

5
PeaceAndLovePatriot 5 points ago +6 / -1

I'm talking about Rev 2:9 and 3:9

3
inquimous 3 points ago +4 / -1

I'm well aware of those passages and how somehow they are used to say that we can arbitrarily hate Jews, even millions of them, based on a theory popularized by a person, probably descended from actual Khazars, who was an atheist, disavowed Judaism at every opportunity, and used the Khazar theory to prove he wasn't really a Jew. However, you can go back to days of Adam, in the Torah or Bible or apocrypha, and find that there was a constant crop of people falling away from God. If they had any genetic or ethnic claim to Judaism but didn't follow God's commandments on how they were supposed to behave, they were the ones who claimed to be Jews and weren't. And who knows the truth of their belief and practice but God? Not me.

0
NeuroticFisherman 0 points ago +2 / -2

Yes, Judaism was the religion in the area at the time and all the books in the Bible are written In a Jewish context. I always saw such passages to mean that the people who pretend to be religious and do proper religious things but live their lives and actions in a sinful way, these people are the Pharisees and synagogue of Satan. That this is the lesson meant for Christianity, and not that Jews specifically would be part of the synagogue of Satan. But rather any Jews or Christians who claim to be righteous while acting the opposite in their everyday lives.

1
inquimous 1 point ago +1 / -0

The whole story (history) of the seven churches is rich when considered in context. There's a YT series about them, it's a little long but gives you a picture of the many religions and their interactions. Was a pretty trying time for the early Christians when they were still considered a Jewish sect but the other Jewish groups rejected them, and "Satan" in the form of the Roman religions could squash all of them.

3
maninthehighcastle 3 points ago +3 / -0

The key that opens the mind from matrix. "deliver us from evil " takes on a whole new meaning when you know this.

4
PeaceAndLovePatriot 4 points ago +5 / -1

Jesus exposed them

They killed him. They kill all the 'prophets', or those who condemn them.

Those who you can't criticize...

7
knight3mplar 7 points ago +7 / -0

This was planned. Black hats needed to get out in front of why so few births (vaccine injury). Now they have their excuse.

3
Traveling_Thru_Time 3 points ago +3 / -0

Bingo. All roads point to depopulation.

6
TrappedInBlueState 6 points ago +6 / -0

"Abortion Justice"

6
biglyboi 6 points ago +6 / -0

I'm sure the leaker has been talking with people to tip them off and maximize outrage. Think about it. If you were potentially going to throw your career away to leak something, you'd want to make sure it made an impact. Probably has been talking with people before officially leaking to make sure pro-abort groups can have a head start on organizing.

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
2
biglyboi 2 points ago +2 / -0

Wouldn't doubt it. Either way it's an operation, which would involve coordination beforehand, like pre planned protests and buying domains

6
naahbruh 6 points ago +6 / -0

Asking the real questions. This has been my thought as well, no way this wasn't planned. They're trying to cover up so many things at this point that I feel like a leak of this nature was a carpet bomb to try and squash all the other scandals in one fell swoop.

6
ravonaf 6 points ago +6 / -0

No offense. But the fight against abortion has been non stop since Roe v Wade was first decided. This doesn't mean anything as there has always been something going on around this fight.

6
3
inquimous 3 points ago +3 / -0

The last link mentions this "Rabbi" and her beliefs, and shoots them down with Torah. Even a professor of Talmud is opposed. Now here is a Jew, Ruttenberg, who is not a Jew. Not because of her family history but because she is against several fundamental principles of Judaism.

2
PowderRoomPolitics 2 points ago +2 / -0

thank you. this confirms both my point and the writer of the op-ed for Times OF Israel said about Ruttenberg.

5
Bedminster 5 points ago +5 / -0

How did they have professionally made signs within hours of this "leak" as well?

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
5
russiah 5 points ago +5 / -0

Nancy & Schumer memo was quickly published.

4
Donny_Fiasco 4 points ago +4 / -0

Seems to me this "leak" was released earlier then expected.

Perhaps they were intending to save this for closer to the midterms.

As of now, I take this that the white hats released it because the anger will burn off by November, though understandably the rhetoric won't.

4
FlexPowerhouse 4 points ago +4 / -0

There will be many things for BongoLM and Auntifa to be paid to protest again, it's time to wear them out. Don't forget that Rittenhouse is in their heads and they will be more violent or apprehensive.

4
numina18 4 points ago +4 / -0

They are psychic. No, wait....They are psychos. Yes.

4
GA_Logic 4 points ago +4 / -0

It is said that black hats wanted a distraction from Russia dominating Ukrainian forces, injection injuries, and tanking economy which is officially in a recession for the US.

But I think the timing is too early so it is possible the white hats forced the black hats to accelerate their time line as it is only May.

Remember a lot of these mob riot trigger events tend to happen in the middle of summer where riots can be most effective.

This was leaked weeks before Memorial Day.

3
Tewdryg 3 points ago +3 / -0

According to attorney John Turley, the 'draft' opinion was voted on back in February. It has been kept under wraps until now.

They knew from an insider and they planned the leak accordingly.

3
Bullseyed 3 points ago +3 / -0

When something is leaked to the media it has been leaked to the elites long beforehand.

2
Traveling_Thru_Time 2 points ago +2 / -0

(((elites)))

3
WinsAnon 3 points ago +3 / -0

I think the liberal Justices and their staffs saw this writing on the wall for a couple months now. The draft opinion wasn't their first inkling, not by a long shot.

3
xkgb 3 points ago +3 / -0

The leaked document was dated February 10, 2022.

https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/21835435/scotus-initial-draft.pdf

This is all staged and scripted. It's the "next thing", which democrats hope will be politically useful for them in future elections, "vote for us to protect a woman's right to choose".

The more I look at this the more it upsets me. I remember back when I was in high school, the school actually brought I people from planned parenthood to teach us "sex ed". We weren't shown pictures of dead babies, or anything really to discourage unwanted pregnancy. We were basically informed of the availability of their services.

Now I understand that it's all a scam. Planned parenthood receives government funding, and spends some of it supporting democrat candidates.

If they haven't already done so, right to life groups should make school lesson plans available, planned parenthood has been doing this for decades.

3
TSearch 3 points ago +3 / -0

Got to borrow a post from Posobeic. It isn’t a leak, it’s an operation. They have been plotting since the day it was shared within the court.

3
3arL 3 points ago +3 / -0

Busted again!!

3
Gopgirl 3 points ago +3 / -0

Could have been planning the rally already befor the leak, possibly? There are rallies like this all the time.

2
mastaxn 2 points ago +2 / -0

Maybe I'm just going out on a limb here, but perhaps because it's exactly one month before the event being held?

2
Tramsec 2 points ago +2 / -0

They knew it was going to be leaked. Clearly. That's not even a weird thing to assume.

2
Quixotic 2 points ago +2 / -0

they’re always doing this shit

2
Qlue 2 points ago +2 / -0

Who could it be?! Removes mask Oh my goodness.. its.. its.. its the KHAZARS!

2
jackrotten 2 points ago +2 / -0

I had posted about this nonsense last night. Everything is a psyop.

2
JackieDaytona74 2 points ago +2 / -0

Great find catsfive and excellent work in verifying this before posting.

This certainly adds plenty of clarity to the situation.

2
dec3169 2 points ago +2 / -0

I don't have a link because I discounted this yesterday, but I read some site where they were speculating the leak didn't come from a staffer or justice, but rather a compromise of their internal email system. That would in theory expand the number of people able to access the information since all you would need is physical access to the email network, its jacks/cabling, or a console.

I mention it now because the leaked doc is dated in February. Maybe the doc was accessed before the website was registered. The left could've had this doc for 2 months, saving it as ammo for a much-needed distraction. I believe they certainly knew of its existence longer than a couple of days judging by the actions of their "elites".

2
SoMuchWinning45 2 points ago +2 / -0

(((them)))

1
kekistani_prince 1 point ago +1 / -0

This show is a lot more complicated than you think it is, and unfortunately you don't really get the opportunity to watch it a second time and pick up what you missed.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
KAYDEE123 1 point ago +1 / -0

I was wondering how they organized so quickly. Does the Antifa leader like get a call from Nancy saying "lishen (slurred voice).. we need a disthtacshion from this Mules thing, its a threat to our democrashy, so i need you guysh to get ur drums and ur vag hats and ur signs and meet at the capitol. be there or be shquare..."

1
TupacShakur42069 1 point ago +1 / -0

Domain registrations do giveaway info...I remember looking up some Q ones they were all the way back to the early 2000s Like Qalert

1
KAYDEE123 1 point ago +1 / -0

where do these people chat and stuff to organize?

1
Make_It_So 1 point ago +1 / -0

It wasn't too much of a stretch to know how the SCOTUS was going to rule on this one. Plans were made well in advance assuming the most likely ruling based on the courts make up.

There are probably "RvW is the LAW Bitch!" shirts being handed out in Africa right now.

1
vitalesan 1 point ago +1 / -0

What’s PW?… I’m missing the party.

1
BoomerNuc 1 point ago +1 / -0

All branches of government compromised. What is left? …Military?

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
0
ARandomOgre 0 points ago +2 / -2

This document could have leaked any month in the last fifty years and been suspiciously close to some abortion-related rally. It’s a big issue in this country and these things happen all the time.

There was a big pro-choice women’s march last year. The year before that, there was the March for Life.

Is there some evidence of causation here, or do we only have correlation?