BREAKING: Supreme Court rejects effort to remove Trump from the ballot
(twitter.com)
🏆 - WINNING - 🏆
Comments (82)
sorted by:
I am thrilled that the maniacs here in Colorado got slapped down... Now all we need is NO machines with Windows 11 in their guts..
I'm thrilled as well, but the safest is NO machines. Period.
After President Trump won in 2016, my cro-magnon lefty co-worker said we should all just vote online. I nearly dropped my lunch tray just as the words left his mostly empty skull.
I immediately told him we would never have a free and fair election again. I also quoted Joseph Stalin —
Indeed, paper, pen, booth, ballot box, id, and public counting, is a very easy and low tech solution to ensuring free and fair elections. There can always be some local cheating, but never at a larger scale.
Stalins quote is also why I included public counting.
In my country we have all of the above.
On a side note, I have one of the Broward cty punch machines from with some Bush vs Gore ballots.
The sad thing about it, looking back, is that we actually thought there was a difference between Bush and Gore, when now we know they both worked for the same evil maters.
I hear ya, back then I thought they were two completely different parties, center and right-wing. Little did we know...
And he probably rolled his eyes at you.
He probably didn't even know who Stalin was.
You mean Stalin, that benevolent communist hero who ruled over a fair, justice for the workers, and equal socialist republic, says he.
But once he found out, Satan (um.. I'm mean Stalin) was his new Hero! kek
They could install the most hardened OS on Earth on those machines and I wouldn't want them used for the election.
I would, if you let me bring a publicly accessible block chain to it, because that would mean I could audit that my own vote was recorded correctly and at least confirm the counts of every candidate are correct. And yes, I get depending upon implementation details ballots might not be secret anymore.
What about that Block Chain secure voting system the USPS has a 2020 patent on? https://patents.google.com/patent/US20200258338A1/en
Yes! Paper ballots only please!
There is NO excuse to explain why photo ID and 1 ballot one vote is so repellant to the left, just their MO narrative to disrupt the process.
Exactly fren!
Honestly, those election machines probably use MS-DOS, LOL!
The CPUs of most ARM and x86 systems have embedded micro-controllers which cant be disabled and have system wide memory access and ring -3 (real root) capabilities.
Which OS you are using is irrelevant.
God Bless President Donald Trump, his wife, family, legal team, friends, Q followers, the Voters that support Trump, the Military that supports the Constitution and Trump, Law Enforcement that too supports the Constitution and Trump, most of all Trumps security team and their families too, God Bless America, Bless the missing children and you the reader Too.🙏
And, YOU, too Moose! 💕
Get wrecked, TDS cultists.
The fact it was 9-0 means a LOT. It can't be stated how big of a deal this is for the country. This is the Supreme Court, with one voice, telling these communist fools to sit their asses down.
Now, the question must be asked. If Joe Biden actually got 81 million votes because Donald Trump is so unpopular, why do they want him off the ballot so badly?
Guaranteed that Action Jackson didn't want to be stuck writing a minority opinion for an 8-1 decision
Lawd have marcy, that would've been a fun read.
Did you listen to any of the questioning? Jackson surprised me. She actually engaged in a harder line of questioning than most of the others that pointed out how unconstitutional it would be for individual states to decide elections.
I mean, every single justice there knew they would be relinquishing power of the federal government which meant it would be difficult for them to install anyone they wanted down the line, for either side.
Turns out, when the guy they cheated against had like 98% of the counties won, that was not a game they wanted to play. Not really.
Right 9-0, and still the leftist shills will argue all day that the conservative lead court is in the pocket of Trump.
"Are". Are arguing all day that the court is corrupt and this proves it.
SCOTUS didn't address the fact that he was adjudicated an insurrectionist though. His defense specifically wanted him cleared of it. So I wouldn't call it a full victory.
Wasn't really the point of it, he was never actually convicted of any of that -- because he plainly didn't do it -- and so it would actually lend more legitimacy to those claims if they did.
Seems evident on its face since he has never been indicted for being an insurrectionist, much less tried and convicted.
If I remember correctly, some of the questioning did hit on the lines of "How can it be legitimate for a state to remove someone for a crime they were never charged with.
I wonder how that lunatic leftist Ecstasy is spinning this.
I suppose it makes the question moot as far as the question posed to SCOTUS on this occasion - Do the states have the authority to remove Donald (under any circumstances) = no.
I suppose that part of the defense could have just been for show.
That being said, the SCOTUS opinion did delve into how the 14th amendment could be used, which is what caused concurrences by ACB and the liberal judges who felt it was out of scope.
Thanks for the additional context, I haven't had time to read the ruling for myself yet.
Now THAT really made me smile. Straight and to the point!
Keep in mind, this should make Illinois and every other state trying to remove Trump from the ballot MOOT.
Tears will be falling, all through the night. Liberals will be screaming, to our delight. Christmas comes early, yeah, Christmas comes early to all who believe! (That might make a great song!) KEK I can hear Elvis singing now!
Don your earplugs anons.... The Rrreeeeeeeees". Might cause hearing damage...
The Colorado Secretary of State says she's "disappointed in the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision stripping states of the authority to enforce Section 3 of the 14th Amendment for federal candidates."
No, you never had that authority to begin with.
https://x.com/JenaGriswold/status/1764670650592186392
Uneducated whiney babies, they are.
Bravo.
That's all.
Okay - so SCOTUS is not saying "Trump should not have been kicked off the ballot."
They're just saying Congress should have kicked him off, not the State of Colorado.
So look for Congress to do this ASAP. Like, probably today since Super Tuesday is tomorrow.
If the "Republican" controlled house participated in that ruse, I can only imagine the ramifications for DC. None of them good.
Keep in mind, the entire J6 show trial was an effort to do just that and they did not even charge Trump with insurrection, let alone convict him of it.
They didn't rule on whether he should be kicked off, just that Colorado has no right to that. That doesn't mean they agree he should be kicked off unless they specifically say that. Just the paragraph shown above doesn't give me that information.
To tell you if they agree or not that Trump should be on the ballot is not the scope of what was before them. They would have no right to comment unless this was in the filing.
But but but, insurrection!
MAGA
u/#spidercry
Colorado: You know, we're something of election meddlers ourselves!
President Trump: ... I'm gonna put some dirt in your eye.
BOOM.. as if millions of voices suddenly cried out in terror and were suddenly silenced. 🤣🙌
Is it Mueller Time yet? Bahahaha
The walls are closing in...
I am looking forward to the TDS reeeee from Stephen Colbert’s monologue tonight. I will enjoy his tears.
And it’s crickets from the left on X🤣🤣🤣!
We'll probably have to wait until they've either stopped crying or recovered from their TDS induced seizures first.
Is this boom week? Tomorrow is super tuesday and im Predicting a sweep
Q#838 six year delta. "Boom. Q
Any idea how we can get them to reject having the election stolen like last time. My trust in them is badly shaken. This didn't restore it.
So, if a state goes against the Constitution and against SCOTUS, essentially usurping the federal government whats the penalty?
The military marches into the offending states, and removes the lawless democrats from office, just like they did in 1861, the last time the democrats tried an insurrection. And, this time we will outlaw the democrat party- like we should have done back in 1863.
Nothing because they are DEMONrats.
Ask the Southern States how it worked out for them.
We are getting closer and closer to something, Will the military have to enforce the United States Consitution?
Boom x3
Live feeds: https://citizenfreepress.com/breaking/citizen-open-thread-monday/
Que the echo's in the halls of propaganda.
Bring on the tears of the kingdom!
While the 3 liberal justices joined the per curiam opinion, they're mad that the other five justices went on to say only Congress can enforce Section 3 against federal candidates.
They wanted that question kept open which would have opened a Pandora's Box of litigation against Trump and other Administration officials arguing that they were insurrectionists and so their actions can be voided or criminal convictions Trump DOJ officials were seeking should be vacated.
Jeff Clark (former Trump DOJ) says this will be the narrative among the left saying the 3 liberals were right and the conservatives went too far to protect Trump. Of course some on the left deluded themselves into thinking the Supreme Court was going to rule on whether Trump was an insurrectionist and are claiming they punted.
Here's a thread by Jeff Clark discussing this.
https://x.com/JeffClarkUS/status/1764693883429282050
Finally some great news! But still I have a sneaking suspicion that the Dems won't care and will remove him anyway in some places, and not even get reprimanded for it. Look at everything Biden has done and is still doing, all against the law and yet he's allowed to get away with it.
So now Congress gets together and does exactly as they have just been directed to do?
Wow, IDK about you guys but I think it's been quiet in my town.... Have the communist riots started yet??
When a court acts in a blatantly unconstitutional way, there should be consequences. Tired of tyrants getting away with attempt break the law.
Colorado Judge - I rule Trump cannot appear on ballot. (I know this will be overturned by supreme court, but I'm going to take a shot at it)
Supreme Court - Your decision to keep Trump off ballot was unconstitutional by unanimous decision.
Colorado Judge - Woops! Well I tried.