Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
So, that law will be anulled quicksmart, just which part of shall make no law ... do they not understand?. IF anyone bothers.
And the same folks that don't understand illegal searches and seizures.
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
They should have included a provision that the judicial branch can tell the legislative branch RIGHT NOW that this is unconstitutional as fuck
Why wait for them to pass it for the review. Review it now, tell the legislature theyโre fucking retarded and this whole thing is repugnant to the constitution and completely void.
The Commies don't seem to care. They all belong in jail facing the most serious crimes that can be charged against them! Until they have some consequences for their horrible actions we will see this kind of "stunt" often.
That is why I love this country and its sacred constitution.
If this happened in the country I fled from, it would have been approved without delay, but of course it will never happen since religion is the most important thing for Latinos and Latin American countries, and the corrupt politicians of Latin America know it and that is why They will never make those types of laws because the people will rise up en masse.
In absolute numbers, the 2020 (USA) Jewish population estimate is approximately 7.5 million, including 5.8 million adults and 1.8 million children *******
To provide for the consideration of a definition of antisemitism set forth by the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance for the enforcement of Federal antidiscrimination laws concerning education programs or activities, and for other purposes.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the โAntisemitism Awareness Act of 2023โ.
SEC. 2. SENSE OF CONGRESS.
It is the sense of Congress thatโ
(1) title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. 2000d et seq.), prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, and national origin in programs and activities receiving Federal financial assistance;
(2) while such title does not cover discrimination based solely on religion, individuals who face discrimination based on actual or perceived shared ancestry or ethnic characteristics do not lose protection under such title for also being members of a group that share a common religion;
(3) discrimination against Jews may give rise to a violation of such title when the discrimination is based on race, color, or national origin, which can include discrimination based on actual or perceived shared ancestry or ethnic characteristics;
(4) it is the policy of the United States to enforce such title against prohibited forms of discrimination rooted in antisemitism as vigorously as against all other forms of discrimination prohibited by such title; and
(5) as noted in the U.S. National Strategy to Counter Antisemitism issued by the White House on May 25, 2023, it is critical toโ
(A) increase awareness and understanding of antisemitism, including its threat to America;
(B) improve safety and security for Jewish communities;
(C) reverse the normalization of antisemitism and counter antisemitic discrimination; and
(D) expand communication and collaboration between communities.
SEC. 3. FINDINGS.
Congress finds the following:
(1) Antisemitism is on the rise in the United States and is impacting Jewish students in Kโ12 schools, colleges, and universities.
(2) The International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (referred to in this Act as the โIHRAโ) Working Definition of Antisemitism is a vital tool which helps individuals understand and identify the various manifestations of antisemitism.
(3) On December 11, 2019, Executive Order 13899 extended protections against discrimination under the Civil Rights Act of 1964 to individuals subjected to antisemitism on college and university campuses and tasked Federal agencies to consider the IHRA Working Definition of Antisemitism when enforcing title VI of such Act.
(4) Since 2018, the Department of Education has used the IHRA Working Definition of Antisemitism when investigating violations of that title VI.
(5) The use of alternative definitions of antisemitism impairs enforcement efforts by adding multiple standards and may fail to identify many of the modern manifestations of antisemitism.
(6) The White House released the first-ever United States National Strategy to Counter Antisemitism on May 25, 2023, making clear that the fight against this hate is a national, bipartisan priority that must be successfully conducted through a whole-of-government-and-society approach.
SEC. 4. DEFINITIONS.
For purposes of this Act, the term โdefinition of antisemitismโโ
(1) means the definition of antisemitism adopted on May 26, 2016, by the IHRA, of which the United States is a member, which definition has been adopted by the Department of State; and
(2) includes the โ[c]ontemporary examples of antisemitismโ identified in the IHRA definition.
SEC. 5. RULE OF CONSTRUCTION FOR TITLE VI OF THE CIVIL RIGHTS ACT OF 1964.
In reviewing, investigating, or deciding whether there has been a violation of title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. 2000d et seq.) on the basis of race, color, or national origin, based on an individualโs actual or perceived shared Jewish ancestry or Jewish ethnic characteristics, the Department of Education shall take into consideration the definition of antisemitism as part of the Departmentโs assessment of whether the practice was motivated by antisemitic intent.
SEC. 6. OTHER RULES OF CONSTRUCTION.
(a) General Rule Of Construction.โNothing in this Act shall be construedโ
(1) to expand the authority of the Secretary of Education;
(2) to alter the standards pursuant to which the Department of Education makes a determination that harassing conduct amounts to actionable discrimination; or
(3) to diminish or infringe upon the rights protected under any other provision of law that is in effect as of the date of enactment of this Act.
(b) Constitutional Protections.โNothing in this Act shall be construed to diminish or infringe upon any right protected under the First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States.
discrimination based on actual or perceived shared ancestry or ethnic characteristics
LOL.
Tell us the jews have control of Congress without telling us the jews have Control of Congress.
it is the policy of the United States
That means the federal government, not the States. Any State who upholds this unconstitutional garbage should be sued, and the individual government employees should be sued in their own personal names, because this would be coersion to prevent the right of free speech, which is a crime, and no government employee can have immunity from personal lawsuits if they engage in a crime as part of their "official duties."
Congress finds the following:
They list various things that are all based on fraud and lies.
The use of alternative definitions of antisemitism impairs enforcement efforts
They lie about the definitions, and then claim that nobody has a right of free speech to argue against their fake definition.
Of course, they do. Because ...
In reviewing, investigating, or deciding whether there has been a violation ... on the basis of ... an individualโs actual or perceived shared Jewish ancestry or Jewish ethnic characteristics, the Department of Education shall take into consideration the definition of antisemitism ...
Department of Education should be abolished to begin with. They will ONLY use this government's false definition of "antisemitism," which is ALL ABOUT passing laws in the USA like they have already done in other countries, making it illegal to call out the fake Holocaust, etc.
Constitutional Protections.โNothing in this Act shall be construed to diminish or infringe upon any right protected under the First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States.
Here, they explicitly admit they KNOW this is a clear violation of the First Amendment. But at least this clause provides all the argument needed that this "law" is void on its face, since the ONLY thing it does is violate the First Amendment.
Pure violation of free speech and jewish push for censorship.
Tell me again, these are "God's chosen people."
LOL!!!
They are Satan (which means "Adversary" in the original Hebrew language of the Old Testament).
And they prove it yet AGAIN.
THIS is why the jews have been kicked out of more than 100 countries over the past 1,000 years. They ALWAYS work to corrupt their host nations.
So Congress farmed out itโs money coining authority back in 1913.
This bill very literally farms out its legislative authority to IHRA by allowing them to define what is and is not illegal, dynamically, with no citizen oversight or protection.
Congress once again just voted against the constitution and American sovereignty, but that should be a shock to precisely nobody at this point.
The same criminals in Congress brought these groups in the universities just to have an excuse to pass their laws, the same is with the guns. These laws are not American laws in my opinion, law for thee and not for me.
The Senate isnโt doing anything so far with this bill. If they do, then I would worry. There is a great deal of hate speech in the Jewish & Islamic texts. Will the House vote on that? What pukes these people are. Not voting for my lousy Republican Rino in 2024.
The jews killed Jesus. His trial and sentence was a religious one, ordered by the Sanhedrin, not a civil one.
This is Truth as written in the Book of my faith.
You cannot change my beliefs by threatening me with your laws, and if you want to kill me for saying it I will willingly die.
That has nothing to do with it. Modern day civilians whether in the land or elsewhere outside of Israel, are not the people who killed Jesusโฆ and the gospel is not accusing them as if it were antisemitic. You are obligated to first believe the gospel is antisemetic in order to believe the gospel has been banned. ๐ก
The Act is not related to that. Only to persecuting Jewish people here based on being Jewish. Whether Congress is aware of the Khazarian Mafia or not is irrelevant.
Nobody on the streets is persecuting and labeling them as Khazars and Congress is not protecting the Khazarโฆ Muslims and non-Muslims are persecuting Jewish people, students, etc. Everyday civilians (inside and outside of Israel) are not K Mafia.
I think we are connecting dots that are incapable of being connected, and for the purpose of perpetuating the claim of church persecution that exists in the Scriptures (yes 100%) but not yet in reality. Nobody is flogging Christians for โattacking the Khazarian mafiaโ and thatโs not where this is leading. That is outside logic and reason.
Congress does not have biblical Israel as relating to the end times in mind nor the nation/land/geographical location and citizens therein in mind with the act. We are just hitching our wagon to certain/select issues on this one.
Probably started writing it the same time they started organizing and paying the protestors. They have a lot of staff, so I am sure they can do both things in parallel.
Now it's getting serious anons. Start sharing how to get this fixed. Do we all write letters enmass. What address do we send it to. If we don't fix this, God will and it won''t be pretty. LET'S GET TO WORK
Congress is expressly not allowed to write laws about whichever religion is deemed to be the most amazingest. Neither are they allowed to curtail speech, or prevent people from gathering to yell their grievances at the top of their lungs.
Are you saying we should go after them and shoot them because that would be wrong on so many levels however, we are dealing with satan here and so we would be immediately forgiven of our sin because we are told in the Bible to "erradicate" evil wherever it might be.
I wish I knew but give it time and someone will help us out. But IMO EVERY SINGLE ANON WHO HAS EVER TAKEN BENEFIT FROM THIS BOARD IS ABSOLUTELY REQUIRED TO JOIN US IN DOING SOMETHING, DOING ANYTHING EVEN IF IS AS MUNDANAE AS A LETTER.
THIS IS THE TIME ANONS; WE ARE BEING CALLED TO BATTLE, LET'S FUCKING GO!!!!
The IHRA is the only intergovernmental organization with a mandate focused on addressing contemporary challenges related to the Holocaust and genocide of the Roma. We foster education, remembrance, and research about what happened in the past, to build a world without genocide in the future.
No mention of the Russians who were killed in camps by the NAzis.
So, what about the genocide that is going on RIGHT NOW?
Oh NOSE, beat up those people standing and yelling 'Stop the Genocide'... That's racist.
What do you think the real purposes of the protests were? To create an illusion of rampant antisemitism that must be stopped through legislation that is really just anti-free speech.
The Rothchilds are interdimensions HUMAN beings, not of the species with elongated skulls.
Would you believe us if we told you the ZIONIST STATE of ISRAEL is controlled by an ET "entity" reclaiming dominance over Earth in Jerusalem completely UNAFFILIATED with the JEWS. However the LEADER of ISRAEL is PERCEIVED to be the LEADER of the WORLD.
Is this ET entity a Reptilian?
Yes.
If the state of Israel is controlled by an "entity" does that mean THIS ENTITY CREATED ZIONISM?
Yes.
The Balfour Declaration was a public statement issued by the British Government in 1917 during the First World War announcing its support for the establishment of a "national home for the Jewish people" in Palestine, then an Ottoman region with a small minority Jewish population. The declaration was contained in a letter dated 2ย November 1917 from the United Kingdom's Foreign Secretary Arthur Balfour to Lord Rothschild, a leader of the British Jewish community, for transmission to the Zionist Federation of Great Britain and Ireland. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Balfour_Declaration
Do the Zionists have a hold on the Federal Reserve currency currently?
Yes.
The IRS has been a political weapon used by the Babylonian Priesthood in order to enforce compliance from all fronts financially essentially allowing the unchecked behavior of entities like the Clinton Foundation or the Gates?
Daily reminder than the Census, Red Cross reports, and schoolbooks well into the 50s, all point to only 400K deaths in concentration camps, and the cause of which was typhus and starvation caused by Allied bombing of the railroads. Also of note, wooden doors on "gas chambers" as well as reports of the fans not running till afterward, meaning the Zyklon could never have been activated. Also zero human remains have been found with a single trace of cyanide. Also the idea the Germans would waste that much coal when they needed every last gram of it to produce fuel is ridiculous. Also not even modern cremation ovens could keep up with the supposed pace of execution.
This doesn't seem to be matching what I'm reading concerning this bill.
From what I understand, this bill is adopting a standardized definition of antisemitism to be applied to actions that violate anti-discrimination laws. It doesn't involve the freedom of speech of ordinary citizens.
It's always been illegal to discriminate against someone because of their race, ethnicity, or religion.
It seems like the bill is making the definition of antisemitism a standard across the board because there has been so much disagreement over what exactly can be considered antisemitic.
I'm curious as to how many people took the time to look up what the Bill actually says instead of just automatically accepting what some stranger typed into a Twitter/X message and then getting outraged about it.
Reading through this thread indicates it's not very many.
Congress has not outlawed or made the Bible illegal. Nowhere in the text is that stated, otherwise it would state that and we would know it by now.
A) Regarding the current theological and eschatological issue of Israel vs. Khazar:
To claim the gospel is now illegal and antisemitic is to hinge the entire argument on a false theological and doctrinal premise, i.e., that Godโs promises in the OT and the NT to fulfill by returning His remnant to the land, have them repent, believe and be saved, to suggest that that covenant and promise does not existโฆ rather, that the people of Israel have been eternally cut off and are only the recipients of punishment.โ
If we are consistent with the belief that the Israel of โsaving Israel for lastโ are Khazarian mafia, then no crime has been committed. The reason:
The Bible and the gospel never command anyone to be antisemitic, nor do they command the church to conduct antisemitic behavior towards a Khazarian mafia or anyone else related to being Jewish and to any extent.
B) Regarding the Scripture texts and gospel texts:
And, at face value, none of the 3 statements made in the opening of the post (the banned statements) are the gospel. The gospel is faith in Christ alone for salvation. The collective gospels do, however, detail how Christ was arrested, tried, put to death etc., yes, butโฆ
The Act by Congress is not a ban on the Bible and it is not a ban on the gospel. Since the gospel is not antisemitic, the church and believers and civilians who are opposed to the Palestinian riots and acts of violence are not going to be persecuted. People with real antisemitism will be. This has no relationship to the gospel whether in the context of our theological differences on this board (and the outside -world implications) nor in the context of the church and free speech.
This is to protect students and civilians who are targeted by caliphate-loving and Islamic terrorist perpetuating psychopaths, whether in ignorance or personal intent.
Hamas commits horrible acts of evil and they recruit. The people who ordered the IDF out of the area on Oct 7th are worse. As are the ones who funded the recent protests.
Why do you think pointing out things that are factually wrong made in posts here, and then providing evidence to support those claims is the same as "defending the criminals in Congress"?
Yes you are proving things but to me it is like excusing those criminals for what they are doing. It is the truth. I really hate what they are doing to us the American people.
It's pretty concerning that you think that someone wanting people to know the facts concerning the issue is equivalent to excusing anyone of wrong doing.
I get the impression some people are more interested in just finding something to be outraged over and don't mind fudging the truth on a topic to be able to do that.
Hence why normies so often accuse us of spreading disinformation which leads to people dismissing us out of hand, no matter the topic.
I get the impression some people are more interested in just finding something to be outraged over and don't mind fudging the truth on a topic to be able to do that.
That is the unfortunate consequence of this board's comparatively large size: we are at the point where we have a sizeable population of emotional users who are more into farming karma and clicks and up votes than to do any serious research and analysis.
As of the late, I have been seeing more and more low effort posts whose purpose is to farm upvotes and points through emotional reaction. I fear for the future of this forum.
Did you know that in Germany, there are laws on the books saying citizens cannot question the โfactsโ of the holocaust. Why would there be a need for such a law? This law goes back to the 60s or maybe earlier.
Sixteen European countries, along with Canada and Israel, have laws against Holocaust denial. Holocaust denial is the denial of the systematic genocidal killing of approximately six million Jews in Europe by Nazi Germany in the 1930s and 1940s.
You can criticize foreign governments all you want to. This bill deals exclusively with anti-discrimination laws.
I'm curious, did you look into the accuracy of that Twitter/X post in any way, or did you automatically accept it as fact?
I'm not trying to call you out or embarrass you. I'm trying to understand why people seem to automatically believe these posts made by complete strangers. I find it particularly odd that people here do that, considering this is claimed to be an elite research forum.
โIronically, The Bookโ is not just one book. It is a library of books, put together in one volume. pg 21, How to read your Bible; St. Joseph edition The New American Bible. Copyright 1992, 1987, 1980,1970 by Catholic Book Publishing Corp., New York, N.Y. Printed in Korea
Who are the authors of the books of the Bible?
โTHE AUTHORS OF THESE BOOKS ARE MOSTLY UNKNOWN.โ pg 21, How to read your Bible; St. Joseph edition The New American Bible. Copyright 1992, 1987, 1980,1970 by Catholic Book Publishing Corp., New York, N.Y. Printed in Korea
The link provided below is from the Vaticanโs New American Bible. In this link https://www.vatican.va/archive/ENG0839/_INDEX.HTM every โbookโ has an INT, an introduction describing the contents, outline, authorship, dates of publication, etc. It also has a word glossary/index.
Example: Matthew
โThe unknown author, whom we shall continue to call Matthew for the sake of convenience,โ
My top two depressing reading materials are:
Medical textbooks and literatures.
Who really wants to read about sickness, diseases, illnesses that no one can cure with Rockefeller/Western/Allopathic medicine?
Thatโs my experience as a former licensed physician in 3 states (hereโs my rant from my former life).https://greatawakening.win/p/17sOxAiidn/diseases-created-by-families-in-/
Old Testament of the Christian Bible itself without even having any knowledge about the information/links below.
At one point I ask myself what kind of a God is this whoโs involved directly or indirectly with omnicide, genocide, murder, etc even directed for or against his โchosen peopleโ, and will I serve in fear of this God?
How many people did God kill in the Bible and how did he perform those killing?
As I do not believe in the Bible as godโs inspired word, it is easy to accept the myth of the Bible. I believe the Sumerian cuneiform tablets tell of our creation and many stories in the Bible were copied from these tablets.
I used to be a Bible believing Christian, in hindsight indoctrinated that the Bible was the true and infallible word of God aka โsola scripturaโ.
It turns out โsola scripturaโ was a โreligiousโ solution to a political issue with excerpts below:
What is sola scriptura?
โThe phrase sola scriptura is from the Latin: sola having the idea of โalone,โ โground,โ โbase,โ and the word scriptura meaning โwritingsโโreferring to the Scriptures. Sola scriptura means that Scripture alone is authoritative for the faith and practice of the Christian. The Bible is complete, authoritative, and true. โAll Scripture is God-breathed and is useful for teaching, rebuking, correcting and training in righteousnessโ (2 Timothy 3:16).
Sola scriptura was the rallying cry of the Protestant Reformation.โ
https://www.gotquestions.org/sola-scriptura.html
During the English Civil War, of which religion was a major issue, the Westminster Confession established that the Bible, both Old and New Testaments, was the written Word of God, infused with infallible truth containing all that is needed for manโs โsalvation, faith, and lifeโ. According to the Westminster Confession, the Bible in its original languages contained, โthe Holy Spirit speaking in Scriptureโ. https://historycollection.com/18-ways-the-bible-has-changed-throughout-history/
Your "God" was an illusion designed to install the New World Order. Mostly lies, even thought he actual text in the Bible does resonate many truths with the true nature of the universe. Those exist so that the humans who control the world can appease their "God", an interdimensional being who has a particular liking for child sacrifice.
The Bible was created by this group that have been trying to control humans on Earth. Like we have said before; this group was in power for thousands of years.
Illuminati took the original intention of the Bible, which was preplanned Disclosure.
In turn, they weaponized almost every faction within Christianity to hide the true reality of nature from mankind.
The Bible was constructed by the same bloodline families that founded the Illuminati.
Question.
Is the bible disinformation? You've stated that it has some metaphors that are relevant...wondering about the rest.
Answer.
The Bible is full of factually false statements when interpreted literally or figuratively. However many verses within the Bible are literal metaphors that can explain a lot about the nature of reality. Most of the Bible was created to DOMINATE mankind to allow Satanic Rituals.
Havenโt read that, must put it on my list. Was indoctrinated into evangelical Christian beliefs at 15. Followed for about 15 years, then, as the church would say, I backslided. But then decided to research myself. I belief religion was created by the cabal, NWO, bad guys, etc, as a way to control the people. As some rebelled, other religions were created, until we got up to about nine thousands different religions, each believing their own was the right one. I do not believe ina Satan, as the Bible tells, but I do believe there is evil in the world.
Definitely read the โNaked Bibleโ, Iโm on my third reading. Iโm planning to buy several copies to โredpillโ family members that may potentially be open minded or have a smidgen of a doubt about their current Bible based Christian beliefs.
I was born raised, educated within a relatively strict Christian system, so is my relatively large family clan who are very active and some have held relatively high position within the system - itโs been an uphill struggle so far trying to wake them up. Unfortunately most of them got the jabs too- double whammy. Majority are also employed within the medical industrial complex and are still in denial about the scamdemic.
They want to water down our rights under the guise of protecting children, stopping anti-semitism, preserving democracy..., depending on which right they're targeting. None of these will fly as our rights are absolute and come from God.
Believe me that I love this country my America and I am not trying to make you feel bad or trying to make a quarrel about it, I want people to understand that they can say things in certain way instead. I feel really betrayed by this government specially Congress because they are creating laws left and right without our consent and violating our rights. God have mercy on us. God bless
For the "Umpteeth" time since the beginning of the year, we are seeing another glaring problem with out current Constitution. How is it no one seems to consider the fact that our Constitution holds those, who willing and willfully abrogate in the most horrific ways their Oath of Office, to no account? This is the real discussion people should be having at this point...
If you abrogate your Oath of Office, it's no different than committing perjury in a court of law...in fact...it could be argued that its much worse and far more destructive! Yet...people are thrown into prison all the time for perjury. When was the last time you saw any one of the DC swamp creatures, or any sworn Public Official taken to task for abrogating his/her Oath of Office? I never have in the entire 59 years I have lived in this country.
The reason the Oath has absolutely no teeth is because the Constitution doesn't give it teeth. I have said this before and I will say it again, "We are in the situation we are in BECAUSE of the Constitution, not IN SPITE of it." Think about what I am saying here. Let it sink in.
On this forum are some of, if not the brightest researchers on the planet. I enjoy this site tremendously. I don't always agree with everything of course, but the HEART of this forum is unmatched! That said, I present to everyone a major issue we are going to have going forward should DJT drain the swamp and we Make America Great Again. We are going to have to deal with the glaring weaknesses with regard to Freedom and its security as maintained by our current Constitution as written.
Only one I will talk about here...and that is there needs to be an amendment wherein the Constitution, in the utmost severe manner, hold those who abrogate their Oath of Office accountable for their actions. I think the amendment should make it a crime of Treason to violate your Oath of Office. Should you be convicted in a criminal court of this crime you are dealt with the same as if you had sold nuclear secrets to Russia.
As most of us on this site consider ourselves Patriots, we have been force fed this idea that our Constitution is as perfect a document as any in history when it comes to securing our God given freedoms. I am here to dispel this false idea entirely! This needs to be researched thoroughly. How many here have read the Anti-Federalist Papers? How many have actually read The Articles of Confederation? The only thing I will say is that EVERYTHING the Anti-Federalist said would happen if we adopted our current Constitution has HAPPENED! Patrick Henry...a Patriot amongst Patriots said the new Constitution was "Masked Aristocracy!" Why would he say that? What did he know that 99% of Patriotic Americans don't know today? What was he concerned about and why was he a staunch supporter of the Articles of Confederation? In fact...2/3 of the Anti-Federalist Papers were written by Patrick Henry.
I personally am against another Constitutional Convention for the same reason the Birch Society is against this action. However, I am definitely for major changes in pursuit of Freedom and its Security being amended into our current Constitution. Term Limits (the Birch Society is against this...go figure?), stronger and a less wordy version of the 2nd Amendment, Amendment to take away Congressional benefits and pay raises unless voted on by We The People, Severe penalty for Oath Violation, Straight forward language making it illegal to tax anything but imports and exports, make the Central Bank and Fractional Banking illegal...etc. Just a few issues off the top of my head.
Lmao fuck congress
First amendment
So, that law will be anulled quicksmart, just which part of shall make no law ... do they not understand?. IF anyone bothers.
The same folks that don't understand "shall not be infringed".
Yep, the money-grubbers are systematically demolishing all the Amendments.
I mean, those old things, scribbled with a pen on paper, are so outdated, and incovenient, for the oligarchs.
And the same folks that don't understand illegal searches and seizures.
Marburg vs Madison
They should have included a provision that the judicial branch can tell the legislative branch RIGHT NOW that this is unconstitutional as fuck
Why wait for them to pass it for the review. Review it now, tell the legislature theyโre fucking retarded and this whole thing is repugnant to the constitution and completely void.
I think you meant Marbury.....๐๐
The Commies don't seem to care. They all belong in jail facing the most serious crimes that can be charged against them! Until they have some consequences for their horrible actions we will see this kind of "stunt" often.
I was listening The hanging tree few days ago and I really like the idea.
Absolutely!
So now there is a list of name of who wants to make such law to the advantage of the semites and the disatvantage of WE THE PEOPLE? Nice.
That is why I love this country and its sacred constitution.
If this happened in the country I fled from, it would have been approved without delay, but of course it will never happen since religion is the most important thing for Latinos and Latin American countries, and the corrupt politicians of Latin America know it and that is why They will never make those types of laws because the people will rise up en masse.
Now we know why Soros funds anti Israel protests
This right here
In absolute numbers, the 2020 (USA) Jewish population estimate is approximately 7.5 million, including 5.8 million adults and 1.8 million children ******* To provide for the consideration of a definition of antisemitism set forth by the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance for the enforcement of Federal antidiscrimination laws concerning education programs or activities, and for other purposes.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the โAntisemitism Awareness Act of 2023โ.
SEC. 2. SENSE OF CONGRESS.
It is the sense of Congress thatโ
(1) title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. 2000d et seq.), prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, and national origin in programs and activities receiving Federal financial assistance;
(2) while such title does not cover discrimination based solely on religion, individuals who face discrimination based on actual or perceived shared ancestry or ethnic characteristics do not lose protection under such title for also being members of a group that share a common religion;
(3) discrimination against Jews may give rise to a violation of such title when the discrimination is based on race, color, or national origin, which can include discrimination based on actual or perceived shared ancestry or ethnic characteristics;
(4) it is the policy of the United States to enforce such title against prohibited forms of discrimination rooted in antisemitism as vigorously as against all other forms of discrimination prohibited by such title; and
(5) as noted in the U.S. National Strategy to Counter Antisemitism issued by the White House on May 25, 2023, it is critical toโ
(A) increase awareness and understanding of antisemitism, including its threat to America;
(B) improve safety and security for Jewish communities;
(C) reverse the normalization of antisemitism and counter antisemitic discrimination; and
(D) expand communication and collaboration between communities.
SEC. 3. FINDINGS.
Congress finds the following:
(1) Antisemitism is on the rise in the United States and is impacting Jewish students in Kโ12 schools, colleges, and universities.
(2) The International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (referred to in this Act as the โIHRAโ) Working Definition of Antisemitism is a vital tool which helps individuals understand and identify the various manifestations of antisemitism.
(3) On December 11, 2019, Executive Order 13899 extended protections against discrimination under the Civil Rights Act of 1964 to individuals subjected to antisemitism on college and university campuses and tasked Federal agencies to consider the IHRA Working Definition of Antisemitism when enforcing title VI of such Act.
(4) Since 2018, the Department of Education has used the IHRA Working Definition of Antisemitism when investigating violations of that title VI.
(5) The use of alternative definitions of antisemitism impairs enforcement efforts by adding multiple standards and may fail to identify many of the modern manifestations of antisemitism.
(6) The White House released the first-ever United States National Strategy to Counter Antisemitism on May 25, 2023, making clear that the fight against this hate is a national, bipartisan priority that must be successfully conducted through a whole-of-government-and-society approach.
SEC. 4. DEFINITIONS.
For purposes of this Act, the term โdefinition of antisemitismโโ
(1) means the definition of antisemitism adopted on May 26, 2016, by the IHRA, of which the United States is a member, which definition has been adopted by the Department of State; and
(2) includes the โ[c]ontemporary examples of antisemitismโ identified in the IHRA definition.
SEC. 5. RULE OF CONSTRUCTION FOR TITLE VI OF THE CIVIL RIGHTS ACT OF 1964.
In reviewing, investigating, or deciding whether there has been a violation of title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. 2000d et seq.) on the basis of race, color, or national origin, based on an individualโs actual or perceived shared Jewish ancestry or Jewish ethnic characteristics, the Department of Education shall take into consideration the definition of antisemitism as part of the Departmentโs assessment of whether the practice was motivated by antisemitic intent.
SEC. 6. OTHER RULES OF CONSTRUCTION.
(a) General Rule Of Construction.โNothing in this Act shall be construedโ
(1) to expand the authority of the Secretary of Education;
(2) to alter the standards pursuant to which the Department of Education makes a determination that harassing conduct amounts to actionable discrimination; or
(3) to diminish or infringe upon the rights protected under any other provision of law that is in effect as of the date of enactment of this Act.
(b) Constitutional Protections.โNothing in this Act shall be construed to diminish or infringe upon any right protected under the First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States.
Passed the House of Representatives May 1, 2024.
LOL.
Tell us the jews have control of Congress without telling us the jews have Control of Congress.
That means the federal government, not the States. Any State who upholds this unconstitutional garbage should be sued, and the individual government employees should be sued in their own personal names, because this would be coersion to prevent the right of free speech, which is a crime, and no government employee can have immunity from personal lawsuits if they engage in a crime as part of their "official duties."
They list various things that are all based on fraud and lies.
They lie about the definitions, and then claim that nobody has a right of free speech to argue against their fake definition.
Of course, they do. Because ...
Department of Education should be abolished to begin with. They will ONLY use this government's false definition of "antisemitism," which is ALL ABOUT passing laws in the USA like they have already done in other countries, making it illegal to call out the fake Holocaust, etc.
Here, they explicitly admit they KNOW this is a clear violation of the First Amendment. But at least this clause provides all the argument needed that this "law" is void on its face, since the ONLY thing it does is violate the First Amendment.
Pure violation of free speech and jewish push for censorship.
Tell me again, these are "God's chosen people."
LOL!!!
They are Satan (which means "Adversary" in the original Hebrew language of the Old Testament).
And they prove it yet AGAIN.
THIS is why the jews have been kicked out of more than 100 countries over the past 1,000 years. They ALWAYS work to corrupt their host nations.
So Congress farmed out itโs money coining authority back in 1913.
This bill very literally farms out its legislative authority to IHRA by allowing them to define what is and is not illegal, dynamically, with no citizen oversight or protection.
Congress once again just voted against the constitution and American sovereignty, but that should be a shock to precisely nobody at this point.
The same criminals in Congress brought these groups in the universities just to have an excuse to pass their laws, the same is with the guns. These laws are not American laws in my opinion, law for thee and not for me.
Votes
https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/118-2024/h172
More Republicans than Democrats voted yes. Mike Johnson among them LOL
Im starting to think Mike was the guy having sex with that boy in the congress building.
Shouldnโt be surprising. Half (or whatever the mix is) of the democrats are Muslims.
The Senate isnโt doing anything so far with this bill. If they do, then I would worry. There is a great deal of hate speech in the Jewish & Islamic texts. Will the House vote on that? What pukes these people are. Not voting for my lousy Republican Rino in 2024.
The jews killed Jesus. His trial and sentence was a religious one, ordered by the Sanhedrin, not a civil one.
This is Truth as written in the Book of my faith. You cannot change my beliefs by threatening me with your laws, and if you want to kill me for saying it I will willingly die.
But, having said that, Luke 22:36, motherfuckers.
Send bachelors.
That has nothing to do with it. Modern day civilians whether in the land or elsewhere outside of Israel, are not the people who killed Jesusโฆ and the gospel is not accusing them as if it were antisemitic. You are obligated to first believe the gospel is antisemetic in order to believe the gospel has been banned. ๐ก
Or that the gospel could be construed as being antisemitic.
This comment, again?
You people surely are determined to push this narrative, aintcha?
I will speak out against Zionism as much as I like.
The Act is not related to that. Only to persecuting Jewish people here based on being Jewish. Whether Congress is aware of the Khazarian Mafia or not is irrelevant.
Nobody on the streets is persecuting and labeling them as Khazars and Congress is not protecting the Khazarโฆ Muslims and non-Muslims are persecuting Jewish people, students, etc. Everyday civilians (inside and outside of Israel) are not K Mafia.
I think we are connecting dots that are incapable of being connected, and for the purpose of perpetuating the claim of church persecution that exists in the Scriptures (yes 100%) but not yet in reality. Nobody is flogging Christians for โattacking the Khazarian mafiaโ and thatโs not where this is leading. That is outside logic and reason.
Congress does not have biblical Israel as relating to the end times in mind nor the nation/land/geographical location and citizens therein in mind with the act. We are just hitching our wagon to certain/select issues on this one.
Well said.
APPROPRIATE .. the demons passed it on National Prayer day !
Seriously?!?!?
Exactly, what a coincidence and they were trying to convince all Christians that they didnโt kill Jesus.
Aint never seen congress get anything done so fast /s
Seriously though, how long has a draft version been in existenceโฆ just waiting for the right timing??
Probably started writing it the same time they started organizing and paying the protestors. They have a lot of staff, so I am sure they can do both things in parallel.
About the same speed as the ACA aka Obamacare..
Now it's getting serious anons. Start sharing how to get this fixed. Do we all write letters enmass. What address do we send it to. If we don't fix this, God will and it won''t be pretty. LET'S GET TO WORK
It's a First Amendment breach.
Congress is expressly not allowed to write laws about whichever religion is deemed to be the most amazingest. Neither are they allowed to curtail speech, or prevent people from gathering to yell their grievances at the top of their lungs.
It deals exclusively with anti-discrimination laws. Freedom of Speech does not apply to anti-discrimination laws.
/s
Anti- and dis- are both negating prepositions.
Two negatives cancel each other out.
What is crimination?
Anyway the Pharisees handed Jesus to the Romans and orchestrated a mob to free Barabas.
How are they going to get away with it?
Thatโs right.
Are you saying we should go after them and shoot them because that would be wrong on so many levels however, we are dealing with satan here and so we would be immediately forgiven of our sin because we are told in the Bible to "erradicate" evil wherever it might be.
Smart anon that you are. You have grown quite a lot since being part of this board i suspect as have I.
Where do we find a list of those who voted for and against this bill?
I wish I knew but give it time and someone will help us out. But IMO EVERY SINGLE ANON WHO HAS EVER TAKEN BENEFIT FROM THIS BOARD IS ABSOLUTELY REQUIRED TO JOIN US IN DOING SOMETHING, DOING ANYTHING EVEN IF IS AS MUNDANAE AS A LETTER.
THIS IS THE TIME ANONS; WE ARE BEING CALLED TO BATTLE, LET'S FUCKING GO!!!!
ya'll go ahead set up ebay store selling Bibles, we'll all buy them up.
Wait..someone told me President Trump is selling Bibles? Does anyone have the link?
Nvm..I found it. https://godblesstheusabible.com/
H.R.6090 - Antisemitism Awareness Act of 2023
Passed the House of Representatives May 1, 2024.
https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/house-bill/6090/text#
IHRA is in the preamble of the Act: International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance.
The IHRA definition:
https://holocaustremembrance.com/resources/working-definition-antisemitism
https://holocaustremembrance.com/resources/working-definition-antisemitism
Edit: How come an external source is used to define the law?
International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance
are a bunch of Globalist hypocrites.
No mention of the Russians who were killed in camps by the NAzis.
So, what about the genocide that is going on RIGHT NOW?
Oh NOSE, beat up those people standing and yelling 'Stop the Genocide'... That's racist.
So now Christians like me canโt talk about it?
They wonโt apply it to you (yet), but they will use it this way (whoever becomes a target: https://greatawakening.win/p/17t1fXYVo0/for-those-who-think-we-wont-comp/c/
"- Accusing Jewish citizens of being more loyal to Israel than their own nation."
Is this the quite part ? But now out loud ?
What do you think the real purposes of the protests were? To create an illusion of rampant antisemitism that must be stopped through legislation that is really just anti-free speech.
Shulamit Aloni: 'Anti-semitic, It's a Trick, We Always Use it' [DemocracyNow!] https://www.dailymotion.com/video/x141n2s
Israeli minister called accusation of โanti-Semitismโ a โtrickโ to silence criticism of Israel [VIDEO] https://israelpalestinenews.org/israeli-minister-called-accusation-anti-semitism-trick-silence-criticism-israel-video/
u/#q998
Source unless otherwise specified:
https://www.docdroid.net/nT0Shkt/version-2-majestic-messages-of-disclosure-pdf
The Rothchilds are interdimensions HUMAN beings, not of the species with elongated skulls.
Would you believe us if we told you the ZIONIST STATE of ISRAEL is controlled by an ET "entity" reclaiming dominance over Earth in Jerusalem completely UNAFFILIATED with the JEWS. However the LEADER of ISRAEL is PERCEIVED to be the LEADER of the WORLD.
Is this ET entity a Reptilian? Yes.
If the state of Israel is controlled by an "entity" does that mean THIS ENTITY CREATED ZIONISM? Yes.
The Balfour Declaration was a public statement issued by the British Government in 1917 during the First World War announcing its support for the establishment of a "national home for the Jewish people" in Palestine, then an Ottoman region with a small minority Jewish population. The declaration was contained in a letter dated 2ย November 1917 from the United Kingdom's Foreign Secretary Arthur Balfour to Lord Rothschild, a leader of the British Jewish community, for transmission to the Zionist Federation of Great Britain and Ireland. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Balfour_Declaration
Do the Zionists have a hold on the Federal Reserve currency currently? Yes.
The IRS has been a political weapon used by the Babylonian Priesthood in order to enforce compliance from all fronts financially essentially allowing the unchecked behavior of entities like the Clinton Foundation or the Gates?
ROTHSCHILD OWNED & CONTROLLED BANKS; The FED and the IRS https://qalerts.app/?q=%23135 https://qalerts.app/?q=%23136 https://qalerts.app/?q=%23137 https://qalerts.app/?q=%23138
Daily reminder than the Census, Red Cross reports, and schoolbooks well into the 50s, all point to only 400K deaths in concentration camps, and the cause of which was typhus and starvation caused by Allied bombing of the railroads. Also of note, wooden doors on "gas chambers" as well as reports of the fans not running till afterward, meaning the Zyklon could never have been activated. Also zero human remains have been found with a single trace of cyanide. Also the idea the Germans would waste that much coal when they needed every last gram of it to produce fuel is ridiculous. Also not even modern cremation ovens could keep up with the supposed pace of execution.
Not to mention there weren't even 6 gorillion jews in Europe to begin with.
Red Cross 1944
https://twitter.com/DrEliDavid/status/172884380126200229
United States Execution Gas Chambers since 1920
https://www.ihr.org/books/leuchter/us_gas.html
Design Criteria for an Execution Gas Chamber
https://www.ihr.org/books/leuchter/execution.html
The 'Gas Chamber' of Auschwitz I
http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v18/v18n5p12_Faurisson.html
More attacks on freedom of speech. Giving the Government more power and the people less rights as they have been doing for decades.
This bill is exclusively about anti-discrimination laws. Freedom of Speech does not apply there.
Any crime complaint against Israel could be referred to as hate speech.
Where does it say that in this bill? Or in any sort of legislation?
This doesn't seem to be matching what I'm reading concerning this bill.
From what I understand, this bill is adopting a standardized definition of antisemitism to be applied to actions that violate anti-discrimination laws. It doesn't involve the freedom of speech of ordinary citizens.
It's always been illegal to discriminate against someone because of their race, ethnicity, or religion.
It seems like the bill is making the definition of antisemitism a standard across the board because there has been so much disagreement over what exactly can be considered antisemitic.
Here's the bill:
https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/118/hr6090/text
And here is what the adopted definition of antisemitism will be:
https://holocaustremembrance.com/resources/working-definition-antisemitism
Edited to add:
I'm curious as to how many people took the time to look up what the Bill actually says instead of just automatically accepting what some stranger typed into a Twitter/X message and then getting outraged about it.
Reading through this thread indicates it's not very many.
Congress has not outlawed or made the Bible illegal. Nowhere in the text is that stated, otherwise it would state that and we would know it by now.
A) Regarding the current theological and eschatological issue of Israel vs. Khazar:
To claim the gospel is now illegal and antisemitic is to hinge the entire argument on a false theological and doctrinal premise, i.e., that Godโs promises in the OT and the NT to fulfill by returning His remnant to the land, have them repent, believe and be saved, to suggest that that covenant and promise does not existโฆ rather, that the people of Israel have been eternally cut off and are only the recipients of punishment.โ
If we are consistent with the belief that the Israel of โsaving Israel for lastโ are Khazarian mafia, then no crime has been committed. The reason:
The Bible and the gospel never command anyone to be antisemitic, nor do they command the church to conduct antisemitic behavior towards a Khazarian mafia or anyone else related to being Jewish and to any extent.
B) Regarding the Scripture texts and gospel texts:
And, at face value, none of the 3 statements made in the opening of the post (the banned statements) are the gospel. The gospel is faith in Christ alone for salvation. The collective gospels do, however, detail how Christ was arrested, tried, put to death etc., yes, butโฆ
The Act by Congress is not a ban on the Bible and it is not a ban on the gospel. Since the gospel is not antisemitic, the church and believers and civilians who are opposed to the Palestinian riots and acts of violence are not going to be persecuted. People with real antisemitism will be. This has no relationship to the gospel whether in the context of our theological differences on this board (and the outside -world implications) nor in the context of the church and free speech.
This is to protect students and civilians who are targeted by caliphate-loving and Islamic terrorist perpetuating psychopaths, whether in ignorance or personal intent.
Hamas commits horrible acts of evil and they recruit. The people who ordered the IDF out of the area on Oct 7th are worse. As are the ones who funded the recent protests.
They are all one together, destroying themselves.
Correct. Q proved you are correct by sharing the post, saying Israel stand down.
Why are you defending the criminals in Congress?
Why are you falsely accusing me of defending Congress?
Why do you think pointing out things that are factually wrong made in posts here, and then providing evidence to support those claims is the same as "defending the criminals in Congress"?
Yes you are proving things but to me it is like excusing those criminals for what they are doing. It is the truth. I really hate what they are doing to us the American people.
It's pretty concerning that you think that someone wanting people to know the facts concerning the issue is equivalent to excusing anyone of wrong doing.
I get the impression some people are more interested in just finding something to be outraged over and don't mind fudging the truth on a topic to be able to do that.
Hence why normies so often accuse us of spreading disinformation which leads to people dismissing us out of hand, no matter the topic.
That is the unfortunate consequence of this board's comparatively large size: we are at the point where we have a sizeable population of emotional users who are more into farming karma and clicks and up votes than to do any serious research and analysis.
As of the late, I have been seeing more and more low effort posts whose purpose is to farm upvotes and points through emotional reaction. I fear for the future of this forum.
Anyone else starting to see the intersection with what is happening here...
With....
3624
Q !!mG7VJxZNCI 11/23/2019 15:53:37 ID: a1a87e
8kun/qresearch: 7362147 https://twitter.com/RudyGiuliani/status/1198309490069790720
It's going to be BIBLICAL!
THE GREAT AWAKENING. Q
Unconstitutional.
Fuck the jews who push this censorship bullshit.
They should all be arrested for violating the Constitution
Thanks for the free treasures in heaven, congress!
Did you know that in Germany, there are laws on the books saying citizens cannot question the โfactsโ of the holocaust. Why would there be a need for such a law? This law goes back to the 60s or maybe earlier.
Legality of Holocaust denial
Sixteen European countries, along with Canada and Israel, have laws against Holocaust denial. Holocaust denial is the denial of the systematic genocidal killing of approximately six million Jews in Europe by Nazi Germany in the 1930s and 1940s.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legality_of_Holocaust_denial
You can criticize foreign governments all you want to. This bill deals exclusively with anti-discrimination laws.
I'm curious, did you look into the accuracy of that Twitter/X post in any way, or did you automatically accept it as fact?
I'm not trying to call you out or embarrass you. I'm trying to understand why people seem to automatically believe these posts made by complete strangers. I find it particularly odd that people here do that, considering this is claimed to be an elite research forum.
You understand that this bill only applies to anti-discrimination laws, right?
Based on your comments here concerning this bill I have to politely disagree with your statement about understanding what it says.
2.5% of the USA is Jewish so letโs change the first amendment for them, I think not.
Jooz killed Jesus, they ARE more loyal to Jooland then America, eff you congress!!!
The Bible should not be considered hate speech, but a book about peopleโs opinion. Other than that, nothing special.
What is the Bible?
โIronically, The Bookโ is not just one book. It is a library of books, put together in one volume. pg 21, How to read your Bible; St. Joseph edition The New American Bible. Copyright 1992, 1987, 1980,1970 by Catholic Book Publishing Corp., New York, N.Y. Printed in Korea
Who are the authors of the books of the Bible?
โTHE AUTHORS OF THESE BOOKS ARE MOSTLY UNKNOWN.โ pg 21, How to read your Bible; St. Joseph edition The New American Bible. Copyright 1992, 1987, 1980,1970 by Catholic Book Publishing Corp., New York, N.Y. Printed in Korea
The link provided below is from the Vaticanโs New American Bible. In this link https://www.vatican.va/archive/ENG0839/_INDEX.HTM every โbookโ has an INT, an introduction describing the contents, outline, authorship, dates of publication, etc. It also has a word glossary/index.
Example: Matthew
โThe unknown author, whom we shall continue to call Matthew for the sake of convenience,โ
My top two depressing reading materials are:
Medical textbooks and literatures. Who really wants to read about sickness, diseases, illnesses that no one can cure with Rockefeller/Western/Allopathic medicine? Thatโs my experience as a former licensed physician in 3 states (hereโs my rant from my former life).https://greatawakening.win/p/17sOxAiidn/diseases-created-by-families-in-/
Old Testament of the Christian Bible itself without even having any knowledge about the information/links below.
At one point I ask myself what kind of a God is this whoโs involved directly or indirectly with omnicide, genocide, murder, etc even directed for or against his โchosen peopleโ, and will I serve in fear of this God?
How many people did God kill in the Bible and how did he perform those killing?
https://www.quora.com/How-many-people-did-God-kill-in-the-Bible-and-how-did-he-perform-those-killingl
Evil Bible
https://www.evilbible.com/
Brutal Jewish God of War
https://www.jesusneverexisted.com/brutal.htm
As I do not believe in the Bible as godโs inspired word, it is easy to accept the myth of the Bible. I believe the Sumerian cuneiform tablets tell of our creation and many stories in the Bible were copied from these tablets.
I used to be a Bible believing Christian, in hindsight indoctrinated that the Bible was the true and infallible word of God aka โsola scripturaโ.
It turns out โsola scripturaโ was a โreligiousโ solution to a political issue with excerpts below:
What is sola scriptura?
โThe phrase sola scriptura is from the Latin: sola having the idea of โalone,โ โground,โ โbase,โ and the word scriptura meaning โwritingsโโreferring to the Scriptures. Sola scriptura means that Scripture alone is authoritative for the faith and practice of the Christian. The Bible is complete, authoritative, and true. โAll Scripture is God-breathed and is useful for teaching, rebuking, correcting and training in righteousnessโ (2 Timothy 3:16). Sola scriptura was the rallying cry of the Protestant Reformation.โ https://www.gotquestions.org/sola-scriptura.html
Origin of โsola scripturaโ
Westminster Confession of Faith โThe Confession and Catechisms were produced in order to secure the help of the Scots against the king.โ https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Westminster_Confession_of_Faith
During the English Civil War, of which religion was a major issue, the Westminster Confession established that the Bible, both Old and New Testaments, was the written Word of God, infused with infallible truth containing all that is needed for manโs โsalvation, faith, and lifeโ. According to the Westminster Confession, the Bible in its original languages contained, โthe Holy Spirit speaking in Scriptureโ. https://historycollection.com/18-ways-the-bible-has-changed-throughout-history/
Then it gets worse as per below:
Source:
https://www.docdroid.net/nT0Shkt/version-2-majestic-messages-of-disclosure-pdf
Your "God" was an illusion designed to install the New World Order. Mostly lies, even thought he actual text in the Bible does resonate many truths with the true nature of the universe. Those exist so that the humans who control the world can appease their "God", an interdimensional being who has a particular liking for child sacrifice. The Bible was created by this group that have been trying to control humans on Earth. Like we have said before; this group was in power for thousands of years.
Illuminati took the original intention of the Bible, which was preplanned Disclosure. In turn, they weaponized almost every faction within Christianity to hide the true reality of nature from mankind.
The Bible was constructed by the same bloodline families that founded the Illuminati.
Question.
Is the bible disinformation? You've stated that it has some metaphors that are relevant...wondering about the rest.
Answer.
The Bible is full of factually false statements when interpreted literally or figuratively. However many verses within the Bible are literal metaphors that can explain a lot about the nature of reality. Most of the Bible was created to DOMINATE mankind to allow Satanic Rituals.
Have you read the:
Naked Bible by Mauro Biglino?
Havenโt read that, must put it on my list. Was indoctrinated into evangelical Christian beliefs at 15. Followed for about 15 years, then, as the church would say, I backslided. But then decided to research myself. I belief religion was created by the cabal, NWO, bad guys, etc, as a way to control the people. As some rebelled, other religions were created, until we got up to about nine thousands different religions, each believing their own was the right one. I do not believe ina Satan, as the Bible tells, but I do believe there is evil in the world.
Definitely read the โNaked Bibleโ, Iโm on my third reading. Iโm planning to buy several copies to โredpillโ family members that may potentially be open minded or have a smidgen of a doubt about their current Bible based Christian beliefs.
I was born raised, educated within a relatively strict Christian system, so is my relatively large family clan who are very active and some have held relatively high position within the system - itโs been an uphill struggle so far trying to wake them up. Unfortunately most of them got the jabs too- double whammy. Majority are also employed within the medical industrial complex and are still in denial about the scamdemic.
They want to water down our rights under the guise of protecting children, stopping anti-semitism, preserving democracy..., depending on which right they're targeting. None of these will fly as our rights are absolute and come from God.
I see a SCOTUS hearing in the near fututre.
It's all a distraction.
Not in this case - see how it works: https://greatawakening.win/p/17t1fXYVo0/for-those-who-think-we-wont-comp/c/
Believe me that I love this country my America and I am not trying to make you feel bad or trying to make a quarrel about it, I want people to understand that they can say things in certain way instead. I feel really betrayed by this government specially Congress because they are creating laws left and right without our consent and violating our rights. God have mercy on us. God bless
For the "Umpteeth" time since the beginning of the year, we are seeing another glaring problem with out current Constitution. How is it no one seems to consider the fact that our Constitution holds those, who willing and willfully abrogate in the most horrific ways their Oath of Office, to no account? This is the real discussion people should be having at this point...
If you abrogate your Oath of Office, it's no different than committing perjury in a court of law...in fact...it could be argued that its much worse and far more destructive! Yet...people are thrown into prison all the time for perjury. When was the last time you saw any one of the DC swamp creatures, or any sworn Public Official taken to task for abrogating his/her Oath of Office? I never have in the entire 59 years I have lived in this country.
The reason the Oath has absolutely no teeth is because the Constitution doesn't give it teeth. I have said this before and I will say it again, "We are in the situation we are in BECAUSE of the Constitution, not IN SPITE of it." Think about what I am saying here. Let it sink in.
On this forum are some of, if not the brightest researchers on the planet. I enjoy this site tremendously. I don't always agree with everything of course, but the HEART of this forum is unmatched! That said, I present to everyone a major issue we are going to have going forward should DJT drain the swamp and we Make America Great Again. We are going to have to deal with the glaring weaknesses with regard to Freedom and its security as maintained by our current Constitution as written.
Only one I will talk about here...and that is there needs to be an amendment wherein the Constitution, in the utmost severe manner, hold those who abrogate their Oath of Office accountable for their actions. I think the amendment should make it a crime of Treason to violate your Oath of Office. Should you be convicted in a criminal court of this crime you are dealt with the same as if you had sold nuclear secrets to Russia.
As most of us on this site consider ourselves Patriots, we have been force fed this idea that our Constitution is as perfect a document as any in history when it comes to securing our God given freedoms. I am here to dispel this false idea entirely! This needs to be researched thoroughly. How many here have read the Anti-Federalist Papers? How many have actually read The Articles of Confederation? The only thing I will say is that EVERYTHING the Anti-Federalist said would happen if we adopted our current Constitution has HAPPENED! Patrick Henry...a Patriot amongst Patriots said the new Constitution was "Masked Aristocracy!" Why would he say that? What did he know that 99% of Patriotic Americans don't know today? What was he concerned about and why was he a staunch supporter of the Articles of Confederation? In fact...2/3 of the Anti-Federalist Papers were written by Patrick Henry.
I personally am against another Constitutional Convention for the same reason the Birch Society is against this action. However, I am definitely for major changes in pursuit of Freedom and its Security being amended into our current Constitution. Term Limits (the Birch Society is against this...go figure?), stronger and a less wordy version of the 2nd Amendment, Amendment to take away Congressional benefits and pay raises unless voted on by We The People, Severe penalty for Oath Violation, Straight forward language making it illegal to tax anything but imports and exports, make the Central Bank and Fractional Banking illegal...etc. Just a few issues off the top of my head.
This 1000%, meanwhile we have people here falling for the bait.