WOW this is BOMBSHELL Material! This must be what he was afraid of. This gives credence to the theory that Pompeo was at least aware of the assasination attempt on Trump on July 13th and that he was going to be Nikki Haley's VP!
Let's put the question of whether Pompeo is involved aside or not.
The reality is, neither Okeefe or Shellenberger make ANY accusation against Pompeo in the content provided here, nor in Shellenberger's substack article
So firstly, the claim that Pompeo was involved belongs to the X.com account (with ZERO source), and then the OP here multiplied that by directly saying that this is O'keefe's claim. Which it isn't.
I hate that. This is far, for worse than MSM propaganda. It's fake and false information disguising itself as 'truth' and anon work. As being pro-Awakening when the approach is completely antithetical to the Great Awakening and Q.
This is fake and not a bombshell. The assertion about Pompeo is ALL by the X account Real Robert. None of the content he delivers indicates or accuses Pompeo whatsoever.
This point can’t be overlooked. If there wasn’t disinformation the plan would be easily unwound as it was happening. Further it had to be GOOD disinformation to mislead the bad guys. We can’t get upset when it also misled us.
Fair point. However it might be good information. It could also be disinformation I see the need for 72 hours rule. Ugh sometimes it reminds me of the Abbot and Costello. lol
Don't discount the Marx brothers. I mean, Why a duck? hehe.
Good information vs bad information: the first way to begin vetting that is to actually read it through and see if it makes sense. There have been plenty of accusations about Pompeo, including some high profile ones by Tucker Carlson. But the accounts here are blatantly saying "According to James O'Keefe...' when there is zero basis for that statement offered.
That's a red flag, regardless of whether Pompeo was involved or not.
It's important to distinguish between the issues, and parse how and in what way different information is being offered, or pushed.
lol. I think about that sometimes too. What a sad job think they were the kid who dreamed of catching bad guys only to realize they were stuck making sure a bunch of frogs didn’t get out of line with the memes and accidentally expose the wrong rich dude hurting kids. OR is did the kid who always raised their hand to take names for the teacher grow up with being a glowie as his dream job?
I've said this before. "Trust Kansas" - or any of the others - could alternatively mean "trust that xxxxx will always do something bad". Kind of like you could trust 0bama was doing bad stuff, or Biden had dementia. If someone always does xyz you can pretty much that they will continue to do xyz.
Anons won't be, but the general public might be. Schiff is a rotten one, and he's fooled many on the left. Though that doesn't seem to take much nowadays...
That was my first thought as well. There’s probably more to the story, and I am interested in seeing what comes out. Unfortunately, with all of the exposure, not one arrest. If nobody is held a cannibal, we’ll just go back to the way things were before Trump got reelected
I didn't know Pompeo was involved with this. I knew there was talk he was involved in shady crap but not this. I guess that's why he looks so different not counting his gastric bypass.
Exactly… For somebody who’s on screen every day, you think you would’ve seen the path of weight loss evident over overtime. But for some reason, there is no record.
I couldn’t tell you because I don’t watch Alex Jones on the regular. I just remember one day seeing this new person. I can’t say there’s a double for everyone, but ever since the Sandy Hook settlement, I feel like he’s different now. A lot different.
James said there was two stories that sent him into hiding so if this is one of them and it does seem big enough to be, my guess would be the second one is even bigger. 🍿💥🍿
I agree. I’m not holding my breath for any actual justice. Bondy and Patel have everything they need, and I don’t see them making a move on the most prolific pedophile story where two people have already been sent to prison for. But magically there’s no actual clients. Cash talked a big game, but I don’t see him doing much at all in his position.
Yeah, he should give us constant status reports on everyone he’s going after, before he does it, and then let us know who he got so that everyone that’s next on the chain won’t see him coming, either.
Not visible to us <> Not happening
Put it another way, if there have been a bunch of body doubles walking around, justice may well have happened years ago for a lot of the people whose names we know.
No where in this article does Shellenberger mention or accuse Pompeo at all. Zero mention.
Yes, he directly references the CIA and USAID, so no problem there, but the assertion in the X.com post is the creation of Real Robert.
I haven't pinned down the timing of the O'Keefe statement clip here, but there is NOTHING on the O'Keefe Media Group's twitter feed referring to this assertion that Pompeo colluded with Schiff and others.
In the clip here, O'Keefe's does not mention Pompeo either. Zero Mention.
He DOES mention "Sources close to the House permanent committee led by Adam Schiff covertly continued working out of a (air quotes) small room in Langley and he had access to raw logs and agencies like the CIA and the National Security Council"
This is what Inflooencers do. They fabricate their own claims, slap together seemingly (on the surface) related content, and then push it. They use sensationalism to advance a narrative, but provide no substantial sources or references, to their <ferquently dodgy> claims.
Sadly, you OP have added the falseness that this is O'Keefe's claim when there is NO SOURCE for that assertion.
Bias confirmation much?
To me, this X post looks very much like a X.com Inflooencer trying real hard to cash in on Jame's Okeefe's recent "This one scares me..." and "I'm not suicidal..." post, by trying to tie an old clip from O'Keefe in to an old interview with Shellenberger.
We know that some people believe and strongly cling to the belief that Pompeo is / was dirty and worked against Trump. There is some evidence and claims around that, but it is by no means a proven fact or belief.
Let's stick to facts, verifiable content, and well-sources claims. It's a better way to proceed than to simply follow what we want to believe.
The name of the CIA whistleblower was Eric Ciaramella. When his name went public, we were warned we were not allowed to use his name. Schiff said he didn't know the name of the whistleblower at the impeachment hearing and later we learned Schiff and his staff were collaborating with Eric prior to the impeachment.
I am not defending Pompeo however:
I wonder if Ciaramella, conferred with Pompeo at the time, Pompeo being the Director of the CIA. If so, do you think Pompeo encouraged Eric, perhaps as a means to bait or lure Schiff into digging his own grave? Schiff was desperate and I have heard many times, these people are stupid.
Mike Pompeo was MAKING Q-DROPS back when it started so you have to overcome that. How did he get the Clock dialed in at EXACT TIMES making posts on-line in a rapid secession?
This is the turning point. We knew something like this was the case, but not the actual extent and all the players. Now we know, and so does the world.
Me too! Because he’s in hiding he could disappear and then we’d never see the truth. But isn’t that really the whole Q movement 🤷♀️ breadcrumbs… signs… figuring things out? They are very few actual facts, and a whole lot of faith. Trust the plan
Someone puts out a fake narrative, adds an Okeefe Clip, (with no foundation for the claim in question) and then multiple accounts and people multiply it.
The rest of us can put two and two together, bro. There's a reason why Pompeo isn't in Trump's new admin, even though he begged and pleaded to be part of it. Schiff wouldn't have been given access to anything at Langley without the approval of someone VERY HIGH UP or someone who retired and was very high up.
There's a reason why Pompeo isn't in Trump's new admin
Actually, I would think there are several reasons, but as to what they are, you and I are only speculating. Unless you are part of Trump's inner circle. Then, I take it all back.
Schiff wouldn't have been given access to anything at Langley without the approval of someone VERY HIGH UP
What you are asserting here is that you understand the inner workings of the intelligence community in general and the inner workings of the C_A expertly and well. Are you a former agent? have a parent or a brother etc who is or was an agent? At what level?
Otherwise, you're just projecting the idea: "Hey, I know how it works, because I'm smart."
Secret organizations, and intelligence.... that's a very cloudy world, as far as I know. O'Keefe says "covertly continued working out of a (air quotes) small room in Langley". Covertly means secretly. Secretly. You think that somehow, Schiff, as the CHAIR, of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence would NOT be able to have access to all sorts of things, places and facilities in Langley?
And, then putting aside the question of whether a sting operation was involved or not. ("I caught them all")...
All of this is besides the point. Different folks have different perspectives on Pompeo. I recognize that.
But the point here is that O'Keefe NEVER made the assertions or accusations towards Pompeo that certain X.com accounts and others are saying he did. It's pure baloney.
Rejecting baloney from the DS propaganda machine and embracing baloney from 'inflooencers' because they are on 'our side'.... Contradictory proposition, imo.
You don't have to be part of Trump's inner circle to see just how much of a backstabber Pompeo is. Q said double meanings, Trust Kansas likely never meant Pompeo to begin with.
No, Schiff would not have a personal SCIF anywhere other than within Congress; he would not have access to that room without someone giving him access.
Again, he may not have made it against Pompeo, but again, you can put two and two together. The fact that Pompeo also testified to the J6 committee doesn't sit well with anyone either.
The fact that you're kissing Pompeo's ass makes me question you, for real.
The minute he testified against Trump, he was the enemy.
You don't have to be part of Trump's inner circle to see just how much of a backstabber Pompeo is.
I never said that. I said, unless you are part of Trump's inner circle, you do not know the actual reasons why Trump did not include Pompeo in Trump Admin #2. (I think there are several likely reasons, but I'm not pretending that I actually know.)
Trust Kansas likely never meant Pompeo to begin with.
This is unequivocally wrong from several angles. Q confirmed in a picture of Pompeo that he was "Kansas". (It was a picture of hands holding a card with a checklist and an anon queried: "Is this potus? I thought Potus does not wear a wedding ring like this?" (paraphrased) and Q confirmed "Kansas". The picture is of Pompeo's hands.
If you check the Q drops, it's unequivocal.
The angle that "Oh, Q said Trust Kansas but Q never (or likely never) meant Pompeo" is just fanciful thinking attempting to avoid the issue of what Q meant. In my view, this approach is firmly grounded in a willingness to just run with what feels an emotionally satisfying "Oh, I can hate this guy because now he's an enemy" as opposed to actually applying some very serious critical thinking that includes working through the implications of the idea that we're in an information war, and that Trump team is waging narrative war against a very dark enemy.
It might be comforting to choose that path, but it's not constructive. In my opinion.
"Trust Kansas" ~ Q
Whether this is disinfo or not you're free to speculate, but it is exceedingly clear to serious anons that Kansas refers to Pompeo.
The fact that you're kissing Pompeo's ass makes me question you, for real.
Question away. My track record here speaks for itself. (Cannot say the same about you... but...)
What's telling to me is that you are willing to take your beliefs, theories and ideas and parade them as if they are facts. That's intellectually dishonest.
It appears that you don't seem to care that false information was presented here and spread, simply because it dovetails into your personal animus towards Pompeo.
The argument about Pompeo belongs in a separate post and conversation.
I accept your passion for Maga and for supporting Trump. We share that. But we make more progress against the matrix and the programming that the Cabal has been pursuing in our societies for decades now by applying rigorous standards to how we deal with information, highlighting truth, than by leaning in to groupthink and emotionally driven analysis.
To the people with TDS, this will mean nothing and will be dismissed as Trump trying to distract us from the fact that he's destroying the economy. Just read the x comments. It's took only minutes before the TDS sufferers put that spin on it.
This comes an no surprise to the people that have been paying attention and digging. This hopefully will wake up the masses.
True but we need him to release it,to wake up the new people.
Eggxactly "we" already knew this.
WOW this is BOMBSHELL Material! This must be what he was afraid of. This gives credence to the theory that Pompeo was at least aware of the assasination attempt on Trump on July 13th and that he was going to be Nikki Haley's VP!
I’ve never been a fan of Pompeo. But many here are.
Did you really examine or verify or vet the claim that u/ThisIsHowItStarts makes and which the X Account https://x.com/Real_RobN/ makes?
Because there is NO substance that he delivers. Neither O'Keefe nor Shellenberger make any accusation against Pompeo.
The narrative was pushed by a few accounts earlier.
https://x.com/TrueJJMurray/status/1914459385067397144
2 weeks ago.
https://x.com/JDunlap1974/status/1913989567603974251
But where is there ANY mention of Pompeo?
See also:
https://greatawakening.win/p/19AxUnLnT4/x/c/4eSkd2ByZUL
Thanks. Its close to 4am and I was a little worried I was missing something in thinking this is essentially a nothing burger X post.
If this is true, it’d definitely explain why he lost a ton of weight suddenly.
It would also mean that currently being a fan of “Mike Pompeo” may well be justifiable.
Let's put the question of whether Pompeo is involved aside or not.
The reality is, neither Okeefe or Shellenberger make ANY accusation against Pompeo in the content provided here, nor in Shellenberger's substack article
https://www.public.news/p/both-usaid-and-the-cia-were-behind
https://www.public.news/p/cia-had-foreign-allies-spy-on-trump
So firstly, the claim that Pompeo was involved belongs to the X.com account (with ZERO source), and then the OP here multiplied that by directly saying that this is O'keefe's claim. Which it isn't.
I hate that. This is far, for worse than MSM propaganda. It's fake and false information disguising itself as 'truth' and anon work. As being pro-Awakening when the approach is completely antithetical to the Great Awakening and Q.
Good call
This is fake and not a bombshell. The assertion about Pompeo is ALL by the X account Real Robert. None of the content he delivers indicates or accuses Pompeo whatsoever.
Something something trust Kansas
Disinformation is necessary
This point can’t be overlooked. If there wasn’t disinformation the plan would be easily unwound as it was happening. Further it had to be GOOD disinformation to mislead the bad guys. We can’t get upset when it also misled us.
And yet, who is asserting that Pompeo was involved? Not Shellenberger, and not Okeefe.
Its the X account who makes this claim.
Fair point. However it might be good information. It could also be disinformation I see the need for 72 hours rule. Ugh sometimes it reminds me of the Abbot and Costello. lol
Don't discount the Marx brothers. I mean, Why a duck? hehe.
Good information vs bad information: the first way to begin vetting that is to actually read it through and see if it makes sense. There have been plenty of accusations about Pompeo, including some high profile ones by Tucker Carlson. But the accounts here are blatantly saying "According to James O'Keefe...' when there is zero basis for that statement offered.
That's a red flag, regardless of whether Pompeo was involved or not.
It's important to distinguish between the issues, and parse how and in what way different information is being offered, or pushed.
I forgot about the Marx brothers I loved those guys as a kid good one 😃
Absolutely! 🎯
Trust Kansas... 🤔
Probably to make Pompeo feel comfortable to go forward with the plans. We know the CIA was analyzing the Q drops. They monitor these boards.
I just wanna take a moment and say hi to the glowie assigned to me:
Hi faggot. Enjoy gitmo!
lol. I think about that sometimes too. What a sad job think they were the kid who dreamed of catching bad guys only to realize they were stuck making sure a bunch of frogs didn’t get out of line with the memes and accidentally expose the wrong rich dude hurting kids. OR is did the kid who always raised their hand to take names for the teacher grow up with being a glowie as his dream job?
Hilarious that I'm labeled by the government for screenshotting the morons of reddit and their extremist views.
CIA are a bunch of gay clowns. I always heard don't ever to join the CIA.
Is there any other interpretation of Kansas other than being code for Pompeo?
“disinformation is necessary”. Hard to know what should be taken at face value, and what was necessary disinformation for whatever distraction.
Yep
🧐 hmmm indeed…
No.... tRuSt kAnSaS.
I've said this before. "Trust Kansas" - or any of the others - could alternatively mean "trust that xxxxx will always do something bad". Kind of like you could trust 0bama was doing bad stuff, or Biden had dementia. If someone always does xyz you can pretty much that they will continue to do xyz.
Psh, yeah like it was just pencil neck that conspired.
Keep it coming chief!
So....Is this "revelation" one of the two big things he's hiding from right now? (Gone dark or whatever)
Anons shouldn't be surprised at all, given what we know about all these characters.
Anons won't be, but the general public might be. Schiff is a rotten one, and he's fooled many on the left. Though that doesn't seem to take much nowadays...
The left also rotten and do not care
That was my first thought as well. There’s probably more to the story, and I am interested in seeing what comes out. Unfortunately, with all of the exposure, not one arrest. If nobody is held a cannibal, we’ll just go back to the way things were before Trump got reelected
"A cannibal" or accountable? With these demons it might just be cannibal.🤭
No wonder James and his team have gone into hiding for the moment.
I didn't know Pompeo was involved with this. I knew there was talk he was involved in shady crap but not this. I guess that's why he looks so different not counting his gastric bypass.
Just like Alex Jones… I don’t care what anybody says he looks completely different now.
Starting when?
Exactly… For somebody who’s on screen every day, you think you would’ve seen the path of weight loss evident over overtime. But for some reason, there is no record.
Oh he lost a lot of weight too?
Do you have two timeframes? I’m wanting to see this myself.
I couldn’t tell you because I don’t watch Alex Jones on the regular. I just remember one day seeing this new person. I can’t say there’s a double for everyone, but ever since the Sandy Hook settlement, I feel like he’s different now. A lot different.
I don’t see it, but maybe so.. maybe so..
https://files.catbox.moe/dfmsg9.jpeg
This is Gold thank you.
James said there was two stories that sent him into hiding so if this is one of them and it does seem big enough to be, my guess would be the second one is even bigger. 🍿💥🍿
I still think the second one involves Killary or Bathhouse Barry.
Heads will roll because of this. If not a lot of pitchfork carrying pedes will be visiting DC.
This isn’t going to go anywhere unless Trump and/or Elon hammer this message over and over again.
The mocking bird media has taught me one thing. A message has to be repeated by large platforms over and over again.
I agree. I’m not holding my breath for any actual justice. Bondy and Patel have everything they need, and I don’t see them making a move on the most prolific pedophile story where two people have already been sent to prison for. But magically there’s no actual clients. Cash talked a big game, but I don’t see him doing much at all in his position.
Yeah, he should give us constant status reports on everyone he’s going after, before he does it, and then let us know who he got so that everyone that’s next on the chain won’t see him coming, either.
Not visible to us <> Not happening
Put it another way, if there have been a bunch of body doubles walking around, justice may well have happened years ago for a lot of the people whose names we know.
The lack of arrests is very apparent. I’m sorry, but I’m tired of waiting two more weeks.
It doesn’t need to be visible arrests.
It needs to be stuff getting fixed.
How many of us have gotten involved locally? I’ve been watching local elections and voting in them, but so far that’s been all I’ve had time for.
Outside of what we can affect, we will just have to have faith and keep moving forward. There’s been plenty of signs.
u/#2937
John Brennan is evil. I can't see him plotting with "Ed Buck Schiff". Hillary, yes, Obama yes, Adam Schiff? I don't know.
Brennan is also stupid, so there's that.
False claim, OP. This is NOT according to James O'Keefe.
It is according to Real Robert, blah blah....
The Shellenberger interview is from 2 months ago:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MXbY_RTYDTQ
No where does Shellenberger mention Pompeo. Zero mention.
The interview came at the same time as Shellenberger published his substack on the topic:
https://www.public.news/p/both-usaid-and-the-cia-were-behind
No where in this article does Shellenberger mention or accuse Pompeo at all. Zero mention.
Yes, he directly references the CIA and USAID, so no problem there, but the assertion in the X.com post is the creation of Real Robert.
I haven't pinned down the timing of the O'Keefe statement clip here, but there is NOTHING on the O'Keefe Media Group's twitter feed referring to this assertion that Pompeo colluded with Schiff and others.
https://x.com/OKeefeMedia
In the clip here, O'Keefe's does not mention Pompeo either. Zero Mention.
He DOES mention "Sources close to the House permanent committee led by Adam Schiff covertly continued working out of a (air quotes) small room in Langley and he had access to raw logs and agencies like the CIA and the National Security Council"
This is what Inflooencers do. They fabricate their own claims, slap together seemingly (on the surface) related content, and then push it. They use sensationalism to advance a narrative, but provide no substantial sources or references, to their <ferquently dodgy> claims.
Sadly, you OP have added the falseness that this is O'Keefe's claim when there is NO SOURCE for that assertion.
Bias confirmation much?
To me, this X post looks very much like a X.com Inflooencer trying real hard to cash in on Jame's Okeefe's recent "This one scares me..." and "I'm not suicidal..." post, by trying to tie an old clip from O'Keefe in to an old interview with Shellenberger.
We know that some people believe and strongly cling to the belief that Pompeo is / was dirty and worked against Trump. There is some evidence and claims around that, but it is by no means a proven fact or belief.
Let's stick to facts, verifiable content, and well-sources claims. It's a better way to proceed than to simply follow what we want to believe.
Ditto. For the stage OMG was setting, this is entirely too soon.
The name of the CIA whistleblower was Eric Ciaramella. When his name went public, we were warned we were not allowed to use his name. Schiff said he didn't know the name of the whistleblower at the impeachment hearing and later we learned Schiff and his staff were collaborating with Eric prior to the impeachment.
I am not defending Pompeo however:
I wonder if Ciaramella, conferred with Pompeo at the time, Pompeo being the Director of the CIA. If so, do you think Pompeo encouraged Eric, perhaps as a means to bait or lure Schiff into digging his own grave? Schiff was desperate and I have heard many times, these people are stupid.
Mike Pompeo was MAKING Q-DROPS back when it started so you have to overcome that. How did he get the Clock dialed in at EXACT TIMES making posts on-line in a rapid secession?
Some of you have a VERY SHORT memory
Yup, they need a good neck stretching.
This is the turning point. We knew something like this was the case, but not the actual extent and all the players. Now we know, and so does the world.
I wish he would have linked to the receipts in his post instead of just a trust me bro Twitter post.
Me too! Because he’s in hiding he could disappear and then we’d never see the truth. But isn’t that really the whole Q movement 🤷♀️ breadcrumbs… signs… figuring things out? They are very few actual facts, and a whole lot of faith. Trust the plan
Note: the "Pompeo" claim has zero foundation in either Okeefe's work or Shellenbergers.
4 days ago he posted T minus 7 days Maybe he wanted the element of surprise
https://x.com/jamesokeefeiii/status/1917609763988463846?s=46&t=EOsj1YQq1bAADGxBbJPUdg
Trust Kansas huh.
I guess its either Trust Kansas (Trust Q) or Trust Josh Dunlap and other X.com Infloooencers who make assertions with ZERO source or substance?
Where does O'Keefe make any assertion about Pomepeo. He doesn't. Neither does Shellenberger.
But let's not fixate on facts, information data and just go with whatever emotionally driven bias of the day, shall we?
How does James OKeefe support this claim? I need some solid backup before I run to my group of TDS'ers with this.
He does NOT. OP here makes the claim that this is O'Keefe's claim. But it isn't.
It is Real Rberts Claim, supposedly supported by two clips but neither of these sources (Okeefe Shellenberger) Accuse Pompeo in ANY way.
It's fake news, of the worst kind. Supposedly 'Maga" influencers spinning false narratives....
Did it start here?
https://x.com/JDunlap1974/status/1913989567603974251
Two weeks ago?
Someone puts out a fake narrative, adds an Okeefe Clip, (with no foundation for the claim in question) and then multiple accounts and people multiply it.
Just like what OP did here.
The rest of us can put two and two together, bro. There's a reason why Pompeo isn't in Trump's new admin, even though he begged and pleaded to be part of it. Schiff wouldn't have been given access to anything at Langley without the approval of someone VERY HIGH UP or someone who retired and was very high up.
Actually, I would think there are several reasons, but as to what they are, you and I are only speculating. Unless you are part of Trump's inner circle. Then, I take it all back.
What you are asserting here is that you understand the inner workings of the intelligence community in general and the inner workings of the C_A expertly and well. Are you a former agent? have a parent or a brother etc who is or was an agent? At what level?
Otherwise, you're just projecting the idea: "Hey, I know how it works, because I'm smart."
Secret organizations, and intelligence.... that's a very cloudy world, as far as I know. O'Keefe says "covertly continued working out of a (air quotes) small room in Langley". Covertly means secretly. Secretly. You think that somehow, Schiff, as the CHAIR, of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence would NOT be able to have access to all sorts of things, places and facilities in Langley?
And, then putting aside the question of whether a sting operation was involved or not. ("I caught them all")...
All of this is besides the point. Different folks have different perspectives on Pompeo. I recognize that.
But the point here is that O'Keefe NEVER made the assertions or accusations towards Pompeo that certain X.com accounts and others are saying he did. It's pure baloney.
Rejecting baloney from the DS propaganda machine and embracing baloney from 'inflooencers' because they are on 'our side'.... Contradictory proposition, imo.
You don't have to be part of Trump's inner circle to see just how much of a backstabber Pompeo is. Q said double meanings, Trust Kansas likely never meant Pompeo to begin with.
No, Schiff would not have a personal SCIF anywhere other than within Congress; he would not have access to that room without someone giving him access.
Again, he may not have made it against Pompeo, but again, you can put two and two together. The fact that Pompeo also testified to the J6 committee doesn't sit well with anyone either.
The fact that you're kissing Pompeo's ass makes me question you, for real.
The minute he testified against Trump, he was the enemy.
I never said that. I said, unless you are part of Trump's inner circle, you do not know the actual reasons why Trump did not include Pompeo in Trump Admin #2. (I think there are several likely reasons, but I'm not pretending that I actually know.)
This is unequivocally wrong from several angles. Q confirmed in a picture of Pompeo that he was "Kansas". (It was a picture of hands holding a card with a checklist and an anon queried: "Is this potus? I thought Potus does not wear a wedding ring like this?" (paraphrased) and Q confirmed "Kansas". The picture is of Pompeo's hands.
If you check the Q drops, it's unequivocal.
The angle that "Oh, Q said Trust Kansas but Q never (or likely never) meant Pompeo" is just fanciful thinking attempting to avoid the issue of what Q meant. In my view, this approach is firmly grounded in a willingness to just run with what feels an emotionally satisfying "Oh, I can hate this guy because now he's an enemy" as opposed to actually applying some very serious critical thinking that includes working through the implications of the idea that we're in an information war, and that Trump team is waging narrative war against a very dark enemy.
It might be comforting to choose that path, but it's not constructive. In my opinion.
"Trust Kansas" ~ Q
Whether this is disinfo or not you're free to speculate, but it is exceedingly clear to serious anons that Kansas refers to Pompeo.
Question away. My track record here speaks for itself. (Cannot say the same about you... but...)
What's telling to me is that you are willing to take your beliefs, theories and ideas and parade them as if they are facts. That's intellectually dishonest.
It appears that you don't seem to care that false information was presented here and spread, simply because it dovetails into your personal animus towards Pompeo.
The argument about Pompeo belongs in a separate post and conversation.
I accept your passion for Maga and for supporting Trump. We share that. But we make more progress against the matrix and the programming that the Cabal has been pursuing in our societies for decades now by applying rigorous standards to how we deal with information, highlighting truth, than by leaning in to groupthink and emotionally driven analysis.
I mean, according to Q.
My question as well. Since he’s in hiding, I think it’s a bit click baity, but we’ll see what happens.
Don’t run to them with this yet. Stick with simpler things like “men aren’t women.”
Baby steps.
To the people with TDS, this will mean nothing and will be dismissed as Trump trying to distract us from the fact that he's destroying the economy. Just read the x comments. It's took only minutes before the TDS sufferers put that spin on it.
Yeh we know
2 questions.
Yeah, the age of question… What happened to Gina Haspel? She literally disappeared off the face of the Earth.
Is this one of the bombshell reasons Keef went into hiding??
https://x.com/JamesOKeefeIII/status/1919469191259652333