Win / GreatAwakening
GreatAwakening
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
GreatAwakening Where We Go Qne, We Go All!
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

315
posted 4 years ago by NessInOnett 4 years ago by NessInOnett +317 / -2
220 comments share
220 comments share save hide report block hide replies
Comments (220)
sorted by:
▲ 79 ▼
– Based_from_Da_Future 79 points 4 years ago +79 / -0

They got busted and DS is freaking out. I can picture President Trump laughing while sipping his shamrock shake!

permalink save report block reply
▲ 15 ▼
– CubeAnon 15 points 4 years ago +16 / -1

A McMerkel.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– deleted 4 points 4 years ago +4 / -0
▲ -8 ▼
– deleted -8 points 4 years ago +1 / -9
▲ 1 ▼
– GA-Peach-Patriot 1 point 4 years ago +2 / -1

Here's a picture of the rightful president at basically the same spot.

Where's the pic?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ -5 ▼
– deleted -5 points 4 years ago +1 / -6
▲ 0 ▼
– GA-Peach-Patriot 0 points 4 years ago +1 / -1

There is something seriously wrong with you. Good-bye.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ -5 ▼
– deleted -5 points 4 years ago +1 / -6
▲ 0 ▼
– deleted 0 points 4 years ago +1 / -1
▲ 1 ▼
– ObjectiveReality 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

Mics are out of focus if they were as close to Biden as they would need to be for the shot to make even the most charitable amount of sense for your explanation. Particularly that supposedly two foot tall gray one oh my god.

Seriously, how is Biden in focus but not the mics unless yes, they are as close as your eye says they are.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 43 ▼
– r_engine 43 points 4 years ago +43 / -0

Media suggests it is an optical illusion, conditioning people to reject the possibility of manipulation: https://patriots.win/p/12hkvukV7M/media-green-screen-joe-is-optica/

permalink save report block reply
▲ 25 ▼
– sleepydude 25 points 4 years ago +25 / -0

Yeah, I'm starting to think this is an intentional psyop to dismiss future greenscreen shenanigans.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 15 ▼
– Oh_Well_ian 15 points 4 years ago +15 / -0

Also, it will make it very hard to suggest that REAL blackmail videos are deep fakes.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ -8 ▼
– deleted -8 points 4 years ago +1 / -9
▲ 1 ▼
– Litecola2 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

Just wait until they get here: (jump to 1:56 on the video, 20-year-old cgi layering goof) https://t.me/TRUTHREVEALEDCHANNEL/528

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 21 ▼
– Heckles 21 points 4 years ago +23 / -2

I like how they can't even explain it. "It's an optical illusion or technical glitch." Ok, lol. Those are two very different things and your "more considered analysis" has no clue which it is?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 13 ▼
– deleted 13 points 4 years ago +13 / -0
▲ 2 ▼
– 4Liberty 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

Because the original video is likely from several weeks ago while the media was standing around waiting for Trump to come out and it didn’t matter if they caught a shot of the mics.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– ZeroDeltaTango 5 points 4 years ago +5 / -0

The brain of any sentient human: "That mike in the foreground can't possibly be behind his hand; so this is obviously fake."

Media: "Nothing to see here! The mike is fine. Move along."

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– RichieAppel 4 points 4 years ago +4 / -0

“There may have been a person or persons named Mike, but they are okay. We asked if they are okay and they said they were okay.”

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ -5 ▼
– deleted -5 points 4 years ago +1 / -6
▲ 2 ▼
– pizza_lawyer 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

Good point. It can't be both....but they KNOW it wasn't a green screen. Ok.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– ObjectiveReality 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

"haha lol, see, you're used to seeing small mics so when you saw a big one you thought it was close when it was actually far"

So it was actually right next to and behind Biden rather than being a comped shot then?

"yes!"

Then why are the mics out of focus if they are right next to Biden, who is in perfect focus?

"...uh...because it's an optical illusion! geez!"

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 11 ▼
– bojackjohnson 11 points 4 years ago +11 / -0

That’s great, so when all of their confession tapes come out, people will accept them as real lol. These people are stupid.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– deleted 6 points 4 years ago +6 / -0
▲ 13 ▼
– Aegonthe1st 13 points 4 years ago +14 / -1

Got a buddy who sent me a snopes fact check this week. When I laughed at it and asked if next he was gonna send me an article by the man on the moon, he replied with "wait, I thought everyone agreed snopes is a reputable fact checking group respected by left and right." Nearly fell out of my chair laughing.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Snowgirl 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

Snopes is so far up the liberal agenda's ass! LOL

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– deleted 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– VulgarProphet 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

Wow, hes only years behind

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 0 ▼
– SophiatheCopt 0 points 4 years ago +1 / -1

It's sad because there was a day when Snopes was a reputable source, then one day it changed.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– ZerroDefex 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

Yep, Snopes has had credibility issues going back decades. SmokingGun was always the better site back in the day but Snopes must have paid for better publicity.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– SophiatheCopt 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

Never even heard about SmokingGun! So you are probably right!

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Phishhed44 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

No. It’s a husband & wife complete leftards never reputable. Only thing reputable is obvious non-bias stuff everyone can agree on is where they “fomented their rep” as “fact-checkers”.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Spongebob1808 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

Snopes was never a reliable source

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– SophiatheCopt 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

When I used it it was to check about chain emails, so this was a long long time ago.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 0 ▼
– LoobintheToobin 0 points 4 years ago +1 / -1

Hahahahaha That’s hilarious

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– Aegonthe1st 5 points 4 years ago +6 / -1

you should've seen his face when I showed him who actually runs snopes.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 0 ▼
– LoobintheToobin 0 points 4 years ago +1 / -1

I wish I could have seen that, yes.

Isn’t it some random liberal lady on her couch?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– Spongebob1808 5 points 4 years ago +5 / -0

It’s worse, it was a random liberal couple who got divorced because the husband was stealing money and had a gf on the side or something.

permalink parent save report block reply
... continue reading thread?
▲ 1 ▼
– Aegonthe1st 1 point 4 years ago +2 / -1

Run by a couple who look like they have soy injected straight into their veins. They're going through a bitter divorce cause the guy spent 90+ thousand $ on hookers. He's shacked up with a former porn star now.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– ZeroDeltaTango 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

when all of their confession tapes come out,

Will believe this when I see it

I see nothing right now that lends any credence whatsoever to anyone in the cabal committing suicide, having been arrested, videotaped confessing to crimes, tried, executed,...or even being the slightest, tiniest bit worried.

I can't WAIT for them to get what they have coming to them. DOITQ!

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Litecola2 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

Where is Gina Haspel

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– Lurking_Waiting 5 points 4 years ago +6 / -1

I would like to know the person that wrote that gaslight piece and punch him in the dick.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– Ogcarvattack 5 points 4 years ago +5 / -0

punch zir in zee front hole. KEK

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– deleted 4 points 4 years ago +4 / -0
▲ 2 ▼
– Ogcarvattack 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

kek

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– deleted 4 points 4 years ago +4 / -0
View 3 more comments
▲ 18 ▼
– SaveAmerica2021 18 points 4 years ago +18 / -0

So your idea is that EVERYTHING from start to finish was green screen?

permalink save report block reply
▲ 28 ▼
– AngelCole 28 points 4 years ago +29 / -1

Yes, the whole video is faked. Biden wasn't outside the WH walking to Marine 1 and there were no reporters.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 25 ▼
– deleted 25 points 4 years ago +25 / -0
▲ 3 ▼
– r_engine 3 points 4 years ago +4 / -1

Could it be the mics have been added, then Biden relayered over? I mean still a terrible job, but possible? I don't know enough to be sure it's green screen.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 10 ▼
– Bottle_of_Memes 10 points 4 years ago +10 / -0

That would mean they manually made a cutout around his hand in order to clip the microphones under it. That makes no sense unless they wanted it look fake on purpose.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– LoobintheToobin 1 point 4 years ago +2 / -1

I’m wondering if they did. Why do one hand and miss the other?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– ObjectiveReality 5 points 4 years ago +5 / -0

Think about it. "Biden relayered over."

You only mask things being PLACED ON TOP of something else. You don't mask the helicopter in the background because the mics aren't going behind that, for example, and you don't mask Biden either for the same reason. In order for anything, Biden included, to be layered on top of anything, he has to be masked. If he was at that location, why mask him out of the background? The only reason to do that is because you want something to go behind him, ie you want him to be on top of some other element.

What element was he intended to go on top of? The mics? Clearly not, that's the problem here right?

If it was just about getting mics in, you mask the mics, layer THEM on top, and you're done. In order for them to go under, and for Biden to be on top, BIDEN had to be masked. There's no reason to mask him in the innocent explanation. Zero reason. You don't mask him if mics are added, yet he IS masked!

If he is green screened and ADDED to the scene, he is by definition a masked layer. Green screening is the only production throughput explanation where Biden is ever masked in this scenario.

And if he was green screened that means he was never there, and the media know he was never there. Because either they never interviewed him and those are fake news media in that shot that was delivered already edited to the media for distribution -- or they interviewed the air knowing that Biden would be composited in after.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– SSConservativePride 5 points 4 years ago +5 / -0

I think the lighting is off on Biden looks like studio light not sunlight. I would say greenscreen.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– 4Liberty 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

The video was probably from several weeks ago while they were standing around waiting for Trump to come out, and the mics were in original footage, but they screwed up when inserting Biden.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Deleted_Redacted 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

bidan figure did walk across geass to heli, and gaggle with psaki did seem to walk across grass to heli. citi journal did catch em but you have to zooom in.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Litecola2 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

Was that not right after a giant dark jacket crossed completely in front of the camera?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Deleted_Redacted 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

I was zoomed in too far, a white truck passed by around time mark.

time stamp of 11:40-15:03 for bidan figure, and he comments on the gaggel.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– jc99ta 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

Seems like a lot of effort for little reward and high risk.

Just sayin

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– SaveAmerica2021 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

Okay but is it normal to make 2 different green screen angles...I never heard of that

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– yudsfpbc 6 points 4 years ago +6 / -0

It's done all the time in modern filmography.

It's really not hard to do. All you have to do is make sure the cameras are in the related positions.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– Stoned_Stiles 4 points 4 years ago +4 / -0

Movies do multiple angles of green screen edits do they not?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– deleted 4 points 4 years ago +4 / -0
▲ 2 ▼
– ObjectiveReality 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

In Pravda media, yes.

And it's the only explanation. If all they wanted to do was add the mics, you'd add them on top of the video and Biden couldn't possibly pass over them. In order for Biden to pass on top, BIDEN had to be masked. That's a purposeful act. You record a scene and the bushes don't come masked, the helicopter isn't masked, Biden isn't masked -- you have to do that purposefully and at cost if you want it.

Yet Biden is masked. Why is he masked? If all you wanted to do was add the mics on top, you'd never mask Biden, there's no point, he's always supposed to be behind the mics.

Yet Biden IS masked. Which means HE is the added element here. Which not only means a green screen, but camera tracking to seamlessly insert Biden in for the pan to Marine 1. Welcome to Hollywood. The moonlanding may not have been faked, but our president is, using semi-professional open source tools that even indie filmakers have access to. This shit has been around forever.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Litecola2 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

Even anti-Q TDW people are saying they're rethinking Q, lol

So public and mainstream that MSM had to quickly start with the lame technical glitch, optical illusion, anything just stop looking!!! Reeee!

Now let TDW start hypothesizing that someone suffering that level of dementia could not cover the speeches, why is he always so well-lit, do his gestures make sense with the audio (because masks hide the mouth), still no SOTU address required by law, could they have pre-recorded his appearances, how far ahead...?

BRB, gotta reload the popcorn maker.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– ObjectiveReality 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

still no SOTU address required by law

Aside from this you're 100% on.

You don't have to give a SOTU 8 days into your presidency, even the annual thing isn't required. All that is 'law' is that the president is to periodically address congress.

Plenty is suspect, and that is suspect because why wouldn't you UNLESS ... but it isn't a requirement.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Litecola2 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

Noted, will look back into that. EDIT: true, "from time to time" although the January one is a tradition since George Washington and skipping it is truly unprecedented.

Un-presidented? Un-residented?

permalink parent save report block reply
View 1 more comment
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 17 ▼
– debacle 17 points 4 years ago +17 / -0

If they were added in post, they would have had to go out of their way to put them behind his hand. It would have been easier to overlay them.

100% green screen.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– popoe 4 points 4 years ago +4 / -0

Very good point. I was on the boat that the mics were added later, but not after understanding this comment.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– ObjectiveReality 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

Exactly. If all you wanted to do is add the mics, you'd never have masked Biden. And a masked Biden is required to get the mics to go behind.

A greenscreen Biden is by definition going to be masked and amenable to this oopsie, but someone would have to purposefully and meaningfully go out of their way to create this fuckup if this was a legitimate shot with some mics added.

But also, why the fuck would anyone add mics in the first place??

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 14 ▼
– ZerroDefex 14 points 4 years ago +14 / -0

I already considered the optical illusion debunk myself and debunked it.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 9 ▼
– clemaneuverers 9 points 4 years ago +9 / -0

They call that "rebunking". Or "reboonked!"

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– deleted 4 points 4 years ago +4 / -0
▲ 2 ▼
– ObjectiveReality 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

It was pre re bunked

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– kish-kumen 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

1+1=3

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– AllMostThere 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

1+1=11

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– kish-kumen 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

Or 10 in binary. Lol

I guess it all depends on what 'base' you use eh?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 11 ▼
– deleted 11 points 4 years ago +11 / -0 stickied
▲ 1 ▼
– illiac-iv 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

Are they even still trying at this point? How can anyone call that a "deep" fake??? I'm not even spamming this crock of shit to normies, because they will think I made that.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 8 ▼
– Puncake150 8 points 4 years ago +8 / -0

People are now realizing that Biden is a fake president.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Monomial 1 point 4 years ago +2 / -1

Everyone already knows Biden is a fake president. Even the left. The question is, who is the real president? The left thinks it is Obama. And they are thrilled with that. They love Obama and want the Biden fiction to continue. In their minds, the green screen subterfuge is necessary because Biden has late stage dementia and the SS can't trust him not to put himself in danger if they let him out of his basement.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 8 ▼
– Oh_Well_ian 8 points 4 years ago +8 / -0

Everyone is talking about the nature of the video but I want to point out the audio transcript. Biden's statements are brief and 100% unspecific, leaving plenty of room to insert a wide range of content from the Reporters.

Q: 'Do you have any plans to travel to the Southern border sites?' Answer:

Not at the moment

Q: 'Have you decided when you're able to share shots with other countries, is it allies or neighbors first? Who will be the first countries to get the US's vaccine? Answer:

'I've been talking with other countries already. I'll let you know the answer to that very shortly.

Both replies have zero context. Any subject could have been inserted with the reporters audio portion, which already seems disconnected to Xiden's audio and the helicopter noise in the background.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– ObjectiveReality 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

Excellent point. And with a mask, you can't tell. A few prerecorded non answers could be used to field any number of future questions.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– LoobintheToobin 2 points 4 years ago +3 / -1

I was thinking how easy it would be to get a clip like that. Green screen room in front of craft service table. Hey Buydem you want a child sniff cookie?

Not at the moment.

Do you want a nappy?

Not at the moment.

Do you know where you are?

Not at the moment

Sooooo many possibilities.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– RichieAppel 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

“My mask!” - Joe Biden pursues his lost mask like a toddler pursuing candy.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– ZerroDefex 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

You're right, those could have been answers clipped from previous interviews.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– MahaYoshi 6 points 4 years ago +7 / -1

Seriously, of all the crazy stuff that’s been discussed lately, THIS is the one that has shills coming in and deboonking?

I went to bed last night thinking “maybe it is, maybe it isn’t”, but all the sudden shills are pushing me to “right over the target” real quick.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– _Donald-Trump_ 6 points 4 years ago +6 / -0

Obvious shills are obvious. You cannot fool us. NCSWIC!!!!!!!!

permalink save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– LightAnon 6 points 4 years ago +6 / -0

Don't ask for details, I don't know anything more than What I'm saying here

There is a lady I used to work with who has over a decade of green screen experience and video production. She was hired by the white house a few months ago.

She isn't allowed to say anything about her work.

Seems connected to me. Only other detail is that she has a license to conceal carry around the President, which is insanely difficult to acquire.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– ObjectiveReality 3 points 4 years ago +3 / -0

I don't have to believe you, the proof is in the video.

And the truth is that green screen and basic vfx trickery is extremely accessible these days. Idiot twitch streamers manage to all greenscreen themselves no problem, and software assisted 3d tracking and compositing into panned or shaky shots has been accessible to indie filmakers and rando you tubers for over five years.

A professional with over ten years experience, be it your hypothetical acquaintance or not, is neither a rare commodity or in any way incapable of what we saw.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– LightAnon 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

I highly doubt she is involved, but who knows.

She hasn't been at the job very long.

She is based, not a lib.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– ObjectiveReality 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

Based enough to fuck up a layering composition on TWO videos simultaneously released to two separate news agencies?

People ask about how this made it passed review, but if someone based wanted to throw a monkey wrench into the lie they'd have showed one correct version for review but accidentally sent out an earlier 'draft' version for the media to report.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Litecola2 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

So, it wasn't offshored? LOL

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– LightAnon 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

true KEKW

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– MagaMormon 5 points 4 years ago +6 / -1

I don't understand how ABC could be that sloppy though. It's like a single dude is producing the whole clip and nobody checked his work. This is the rare clip of Biden outside talking to the press and nobody is checking the clip? Very strange.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 8 ▼
– Lurking_Waiting 8 points 4 years ago +8 / -0

Do you see the Whitehouse YT view numbers? Those boys are struggling. Production value goes down with no revenue from ads.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 5 ▼
– SSConservativePride 5 points 4 years ago +5 / -0

So there are a couple posts on the board on how this could be just plain communism where the lies don't have to be good people just have to believe them or that it is meant to demoralize people on the resistance "hey look we are lying nothing you can do". Both sound plausible. I thought it may be a test to see how many shills will come out and defend them to see how much of the population are still going to bat for them.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Boozy_McFuckFace 2 points 4 years ago +3 / -1

How did a fly get digitally inserted onto Pence head? How did someone copping to a plea deal get inserted into a Biden press video? How did a BBC meme find it’s way into official FBI documents? Fuckery.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– ObjectiveReality 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

The illusion that many people are behind our enslavement is just that, an illusion. In truth, they are few, over worked when we are paying attention, and the moment you bring in outside help some either squeal (Bad ass temporary Dominion IT lady) or they 'accidentally' mess something up so the truth leaks out.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– ZerroDefex 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

Yeah it feels deliberately sloppy, that's been a trend with these like they're dissolving the illusion bit by bit.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 0 ▼
– LoobintheToobin 0 points 4 years ago +1 / -1

Hoe many new agencies used this clip?! I was it on Bloomberg Q. Figured it was a troll but they used it everywhere. sly grinch grin goooooood

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– deleted 5 points 4 years ago +5 / -0
▲ 3 ▼
– ObjectiveReality 3 points 4 years ago +3 / -0

No, you got the basics of it. They also did a pre planned pan towards Marine one and tracked Biden's layer into it using software that's been around since at least 2015 and is accessible to indie filmakers and then rando vfx youtubers.

I find it telling that they decided to add in a bunch of reporter heads for the pan to obscure Biden's feet walking on the grass except for two steps and less than a second at the very end. I bet they worked from the end back, ran out of time and said fuck it, let's just add some damn reporter heads in the way this is taking too long.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– deleted 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 4 ▼
– yudsfpbc 4 points 4 years ago +4 / -0

A green screen for St. Patty's Day!

permalink save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– deleted 4 points 4 years ago +5 / -1
▲ 3 ▼
– Whirlybot 3 points 4 years ago +3 / -0

Going even further out on the limb - there was the massage parlor shootings in Atlanta last night - think that is a planned distraction? Should take a look at the suspect - he definitely has the Dylan Roof stare -

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 0 ▼
– deleted 0 points 4 years ago +1 / -1
▲ 4 ▼
– k3k4p3d3 4 points 4 years ago +5 / -1

It is a terrible composited overlay. Look at the edges of the microphones. It doesn’t even make sense why they would fuck up this bad unless it was an intentional FUCK YOU to the ‘administration.’

permalink save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– Themessenger777 4 points 4 years ago +4 / -0

Theres an army of shills here alright....

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– DigitSoldier 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

More like a few shills and an army of their sock-puppets.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Themessenger777 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

You'll get no argument from me on that!

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 4 ▼
– deleted 4 points 4 years ago +4 / -0
▲ 3 ▼
– deleted 3 points 4 years ago +3 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– Vests123 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

It's obvious that old, creepy Joe can't handle the job of "POTUS", so when he's lucid and awake, they have to take advantage of it.

He's probably out of it the majority of the afternoon hours and is probably napping.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– deleted 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0
▲ 2 ▼
– Vests123 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

Yes very horrifying what is happening to our country.

I, also think that he's not lucid and coherent for much of the day, so they use the green screen to keep the fraud going.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– TrumpParty007 4 points 4 years ago +4 / -0

am i the only one that thinks... why would they have to add the picture of a boom or microphone to a video ?

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– Loquitur_Veritatem 3 points 4 years ago +3 / -0

My thinking is that if the WHs aren't in ultimate control and forced the flipped [DS] to publish this and other obvious mistakes, then there could be some WHs within the [DS] that let this slip on purpose and will continue to drip out reality like this more and more over time.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– Egg_sammich 3 points 4 years ago +3 / -0

I just left one of those threads. They're really trying hard to have a reasonable conversation about how "fake" the green screen theory is when anybody with 2 brain cells can look at it and tell that it looks like a bad photoshop

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– 45willwinagain 3 points 4 years ago +3 / -0

3109 17-Mar-2019 10:59:56 PM EDT Q !!mG7VJxZNCI 8ch/qresearch Thanks for playing, @Jack.

Showing your hand was the intended target.

The 'SRIKE' will be FAST.

Shall We Play A Game?

Q

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Nomoralcompass89 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

No T in strike. Strike happens without Trump, like after the phony inauguration?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– 45willwinagain 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

what blows my mind is i searched it on a whim...

and there it was... 2 year delta and all... talking about hands on the day everyone starts talking about bidens hands looking odd in a video.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– BatteryBaron 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

Q clarified strike was a typo

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– KineticMaid 3 points 4 years ago +3 / -0

Audio doesn't seem to match up either, further going in the direction of a green screen or being done on a "stage".

Everytime President Trump was doing an outside impromptu presser (on his way to board marine one) he had to yell and have the press yell back at him, as the nearby marine one was already spooled up and quite loud.

At the end of the video of the "2nd" angle you can hear marine one really loud when the camera pans towards it. Other than the two "fake mics" the others look to be using a cell phone to record the audio and not a directional mic, every ones audio would be poor and clipping if that is all they used.

Also it seemed everytime President Trump did one of these things there would be dozens of mics on poles (he called the sticks). Doesn't look like the media is even interested in biden and they had to photoshop in two haha.

It is really weird they would let something like these recent videos slip through the cracks, unless some one maybe is trying to send a message.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Vests123 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

It seems to me that someone is maybe trying to send a message...this is very sloppy.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– HamBanana 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

The helicopter is sitting there. Rotors are stationary. Does a helicopter generate that much noise without the rotors spinning?

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– KineticMaid 3 points 4 years ago +3 / -0

Yes. She has two engines up top that are running but sitting in an "idle" state. When they are ready to take off they engage the whirly blades.

What doesn't make sense is why no one is yelling. It would be really loud right there. Theres no way any one would be able to hear old mumbling biden through his five masks.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– ZerroDefex 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

Yep, a good answer but like often it just opens up a new question.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Ogcarvattack 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

and it was visible from more than one angle

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Heckles 2 points 4 years ago +3 / -1

Thanks for clarifying, I fell for them.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Dardar 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

Funny to have a GREEN screen issue on St. Patrick's Day...?

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Feelsgoodman 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

If probably wasn't a green screen at all. Surely, leprechauns are just fucking with us ?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Amadian 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

You know, I can understand people having issues wrapping their mind around deep fakes, in 2021. Though, more I think of it, even that is a stretch... people play with that shit in their bedrooms, so... But please, something as obvious as green screen...? C'mon man... Why is this even a matter of debate?!

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– LightAnon 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

castle rock crew prolly feeling pretty good right now lol

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– djmarcone 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

yeah they fucked up, damage control time.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Miztivin 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

I showed this to a couple of normies and it kinda broke their brain so I used the,

"its probably the microphones edited in to make it appear like there is more than 1 allowed reporter for poor demented Joe." Excuse.

I dont think they could handle the other option...

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Litecola2 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

OVER THE TARGET

Thank you OP

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– swimkin 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

I agree... the whole video was faked. Even the top of his head seemed to disappear along with hands floating through the mics. And if you look close enough the edge of Biden looks superimposed into the entire scene. Anyone who disagrees with this is a shill, blind and/or a denier of fact.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Deleted_Redacted 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

citizen journalist got angle of people walking to heli. one looked like bidan,

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Dis4ff3ct34_L1b3r4l 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

Really? The one I saw recently of a supposed Marine one helicopter landing on the White House lawn showed that he couldn't access a good enough angle to produce enough visibility to even see the lawn once the helicopter landed.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Deleted_Redacted 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

14:45 bidan figure walks out from trees, 15:03 steps onto chop 15:30 gaggel came out of bushes.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Deleted_Redacted 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

zooooom in on it.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– deleted 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0
View 22 more comments

Welcome

To The Great Awakening

We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.

This is a pro-Q community. Please read and respect our rules below before contributing.

WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q

Welcome to the Digital Battlefield - Together We Win

Rules

Q Supporters:
This is The Great Awakening. Our community is international, focused on helping ourselves and others walk away from the programming, and return our governments to "by the people, for the people!"

Follow the Law:
No posts or comments that violate laws in your jurisdiction or the United States. The Feds are always watching!

No Bad Behavior!
No doxing, including revealing personal information of non-public figures, as well as addresses, phone numbers, etc. of public figures. All GAW users must adhere to the highest standards of conduct, whichever .WIN they are on. If we are notified by other moderators of incivil behavior on other .WINs, you WILL be banned here!

Civil Discussion ONLY:
They want you divided.
They want you labeled by race, religion, class, sex, etc.
Divided you are weak [no collective power].
Divided you attack each other and miss the true target [them].

No PAYtriots/No Self Promotion:
Linking or promoting merchandise, fundraising, or spamming personal websites, blogs, or channels is not permitted. Do not attempt to profit from Q or advertise for those who do. Peace is the prize. We do it for free.

Questions and Concerns: All moderation questions and concerns should be submitted via modmail. DO NOT GRIEF the mods.

Expand your thinking:
Remember, this .WIN is the public face of the Great Awakening, and, as a member here, you agree to represent the Great Awakening movement against Globalism, Communism and Progressive Insanity in the best, most positive way possible. NOTE: Your comments and posts may become news. Keep it classy!

This is not a 'fringe conspiracy' site: Topics related to flat earth theory, faked moon landings, and chemtrails are explicitly prohibited on The Great Awakening. Visit https://conspiracies.win if that's your thing!

No doomers, shills, or tards: THIS IS AN ELITE RESEARCH BOARD. If you can't use common sense you'll get banned without hesitation. If you're a shill, you fall under this rule. If you're a doomer, you fall under this rule as you just add garbage to the site like the other two. This includes forum sliding. Q said "We are saving Israel for last," and so are we. And if you're a tard, oh, man.

General Rules:

-Mods used to issue warnings, followed by temporary bans and/or permanent bans. We don't, anymore. DO NOT GRIEF THE MODS.

-Keep posts related to topics Q has raised or that are current. We try to keep an open mind, but... c'mon.

-Keep post duplication (especially from other .WINs) to a minimum. No crap, off-topic memes

-HIGH EFFORT, HIGH-INFO participation only! Please respect other readers' time. Please use descriptive titles. No URLs in titles, pls. No clickbait. Keep your comments high effort. No BS.

-No fame-fagging; no, "your" post did not get removed! Were you the original author?? Eyes on the prize, frogs!

-Memes encouraged, but no low-quality, low-info trash, pls. Excessive, low-effort posting may earn users vacations!

-Keep it honest and accurate.

-Patriots.win / Q Supporters ONLY. (Sorry, this train still has no brakes.)

-Handshake noobs will be scrutinized by their command of Q, sincerity, and respect to others.

Remember, your conduct here represents the Q movement! OUR ENEMIES ARE WATCHING! (Hi, Mike! You LOSER!)

Resources

  • WELCOME TO THE DIGITAL BATTLEFIELD
  • "River of Search" script:
  • GAW post formatting tips
  • Q Research (Q only posts at 8kun)
  • Q post archives (qagg.news) others 1 2 3 4
  • Browse Drops from the beginning
  • QProofs.com
  • Learn to read the Q map
  • Book of Q Proofs v1.3 (pdf)
  • Law of War & Majic Eyes Qnly Resources
  • Trumps twitter archive
  • POTUS: The Calm Before The Storm
  • Pedosta and DNC dumps
  • GIFs & QPosts
  • Poll Post Format
  • SPY ON US! See: mod Logs
  • The Greatest Show on Earth!
  • New to Q? "The Earth Chronicles Ep 12: Q & The White-Hat Op: What's Real, What's Not?" DO NOT MISS THIS PODCAST!

Disclaimer

Posts and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the GreatAwakening.win or Patriots.win administration.

Moderators

  • dropgun
  • catsfive
  • AutoMod
  • Filter
  • parallax_crow
  • Fatality
  • BasedCitizen
  • Qanaut
  • and 6 more...
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2025.03.01 - 2hf5d (status)

Copyright © 2024.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy