You may know the new Supreme Court justice Ketanji Brown Jackson as the judge who ruled against Trump asserting executive privilege in the January 6th case, or as the judge who put a stop to the rapid deportation plan, and that may have soured you immediately; but taking a closer look at her career; there is reason to think she may not be an entirely bad apple, despite being an avowed liberal justice.
Allow me to explain:
Depending on how closely you look, on matters of national security, you may very much enjoy her history of rulings. For instance: in the landmark case of "Muckrock, LLC v C.I.A." she ruled that the CIA unlawfully adopted a policy of denial for any FOIA request for email records that didnt contain sender, recipients, time stamps, or subjects. In this case she found that the CIAs failure to produce the requested documents amounted to injury-in-fact and standing to bring charges. She also found their overall policy was in violation of FOIA regulation, forcing the CIA to adhere to the language of the codified law.
In other cases, for various reasons, she has routinely sought an excess of information from the government when ruling in its favor, preferring to request evidence in camera to support assertions. In another landmark case, "Cause of Action Institute v. Internal Revenue Service" she ruled that the IRS could not claim exemptions from the FOIA act or that the courts did not have authority over the IRS to enforce the FOIA act itself.
These two decisions alone, were incredibly empowering for you as a people. One of them, ensured that the CIA had to comply with your requests for email records, regardless of whether you know a sender name etc. The other decision forced the IRS and other agencies to comply with your FOIA requests, even when the records are not specifically government records, but are accessible to them.
Why does this matter? Because in a game of constant, forced division we habitually boil people down to very minute facts we can judge them on. We try and simplify them. But when you are looking at a supreme court justice, it is important to study their entire career. Hers is a very mixed bag, but not a dead end.
If she’s a white hat plant I’m gonna laugh, and laugh and laugh
Oh, geez, I have to take back every bad thing I said about her!
I'll be doing the same IF she deserves it. A broken clock can occasionally show the correct time, but I'm not going to change my views that it's still broken.
A he will have to earn it if she ever actually gets installed.
To the degree of “let’s pack the courts right noooooowwww!!! REEEEEE!!!”
Suddenly, the would start telling you about how she was "illegally elected."
Right? I mean she would be the perfect camouflage. She ruled recently against Trump, that got the lefty juices flowing. She had shown concern for pedophiles multiple times. So that should have comforted the pedo-puppets that they didnt bother looking deeper.
My guess is, we are still not solid due to Roberts. If Roberts doesn't co-operate on some case, they need someone who will rule in our favour - like against CIA/FBI etc. As for the pedos, I dont really think her splitting hairs is going to make a difference for the kind of cases that would reach scotus.
All just theory.
We are still 5-4 even without Roberts. The right has won lots of cases without him. But yeah, it would be nice if they wheren't that close.
It they are in control she could be.
Were all her extremely light handed rulings on sexual crimes against minors part of the plan? Isn't this whole Q thing supposed to be about.. oh, I unno.. taking down an elite cabal of satanic pedophiles!? Gonna be a hard nope on me for this one
Agree, but maybe she flipped? Hard to tell what's going on with many things.
Has anyone really flipped yet? Serious question, I'm not mocking you. Well... maybe just a little. 😁
Elon Musk
Elon Musk was calling out pedophiles years ago.
Yi Long Ma
I lol'd
arrested? gag order? trial?
maybes hes on vacation
"Once a Clown, always a Clown!" - an anon too lazy to actively keep up with decoding Flips.
They’re addicted to hopium. It’s the only way these people can cope with knowing there’s no political solution and that there’s only 1 box left.
There is that question sir. Thanks for pointing it out.
Are you f'ing crazy? This is the kind of talk here that boils my brain.
It's what we've done that make us who we are. Go look at her judicial record and tell me if you see anything that says she a whitehat savior of mankind.
While she does not seem to be a knee jerk liberal, it looks to me like she was reversed on many of her most important rulings by higher courts.
I don't even care if she's a white hat.
Follow the fucking constitution and she'll be a godsend.
It would be funny, though, if she turned the election case on its head
Oh my, so many tears.
That would be popcorn worthy indeed.
Dont even get my hopes so high!!!
9-0 on Wv v EPA? lol
She won't be ruling on that. Breyer doesn't retire until after these rulings come down.
u/#q2356
I wouldnt go to that extent! That is clearly Kavanagh and no double meanings exist. Or does it?
Now, that is an interesting thing.
Kavanaugh?
Or Ketanji?
🧐
Ketanjinaugh
Kek!
We shall see.
Duuude.... this needs a stickied post all its own.
One thing to consider about any past rulings against government is that they used to be anti government too, or at least outwardly so.
These things don't speak to me the same way as they do for you, but it is certainly an entertaining theory.
I mean, regardless of all this, there is a reason why Bryer is leaving and Ketanji is coming in. There is absolutely no doubt in my mind that this is exactly what the WHs wanted. So, the only thing left is to figure out why.
Its not like they dont already have that with the ones they control. They freaking had a dead justice for more than a year and kept up the charade!
At that time I dug a bit into that. The stuff that was going around was her testimoney to some senate commission taken out of context. And if I remember correctly, it originated from Jack Posobiec, who is questionable.
Isn’t she the sister in law of Paul Ryan? I know she’s related to him in some capacity.
Ketanji Brown Jackson’s brother-in-law (William) is married to Paul Ryan’s sister-in-law (Dana).
It is one big club and we ain't MARRIED into it
Yes, and thank you for posting this because I couldn’t remember which d/s shill she’s connected to. It is Paul Ryan:
https://www.channel3000.com/wisconsins-tie-to-bidens-supreme-court-nominee/
Define ‘Plant. How do you insert a plant? Can emotions be used to insert a plant? Trust the plan.
A woman version of Clarence Thomas? I would LOVE that!
Nonsense, shes a swamp creature
And Paul Ryan approved
https://twitter.com/speakerryan/status/1497244143273144320?s=21
Exactly:
GULPER EEL:
https://i.ytimg.com/vi/tInHUbz3B_Y/maxresdefault.jpg
And: http://www.science-rumors.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/the-Gulper-Eel-Facts.jpg
KETANJI BROWN JACKSON:
https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQDxnAVAv3IOgScw23KpQw1LA0VmSFCUq8PRg&usqp=CAU
And: https://www.azmirror.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/ketanji-brown-jackson-smile-getty-300x200.jpg
What you're saying is that while she might not be MAGA's friend, she also is not the Deep State's friend either. We might be able to work with that.
So of all the child sex abuse or rape cases she judged, did she not give all of them as low as sentence as possible. You dont think she will judge for the supreme court to make pedophilia legal because I do. I correct that she did not give them the lowest sentence possible she gave them lower than the minimum sentence which was a slap in the face to children.
She's a pedo lover and can go jump off a cliff. Fuck her. You don't mess with our kids BITCH!!!
Dont worry, this story has not yet ended.
Because you think so? I haven't seen a single Q reference to her which might let me agree with you but that is too much cognitive dissonance for me to rationalize even in my current mindset.
I would add that the attacks on her during confirmation were very myopic and involved an emotional issue, namely being soft on pedos. And none of the accusations were that she managed to let a pedophile walk free, iirc, but merely that they (pedos) received sentences that were below the recommended federal sentencing guidelines. Not having been privy to the finer details of the cases in question, perhaps we don't know why the specific cases may or may not have warranted it. For the sake of being open to all possibilities, I'm willing to entertain OP's theory.
And I would suggest that this was very much calculated (by the White Hats). The wanted the Right worked up to a certain level that it would automatically give a sense of false security to the Left and overlook any other relevant history!
Exactly, how do we know those pedos did not roll over on bigger pedos which led to lighter sentancing?
One giant military operation. Timing is everything.
Yep. Unlikely that she would reply in the confirmation hearings- "oh I gave him a lighter sentence because he ratted out some big names." Not that I have an opinion, really, just staying open to all possibilities.
That would likely be sensitve/classified considering the operation, so it definitely seems as plausible as a pedo protector!
Delusional Friend, delusional. We’re going to lose this game completely if we keep fantasizing pure hopium dreams.
None of whats in that post is hopium. Just pure facts.
Well OK then.
It just goes to show you that someone who is a staunch ally in one department can be your worst enemy in the next.
She is going to be hip to hip with Thomas. Blacks stick to together, she may not come out on our side right away, but Thomas will be a mentor to her. It will take time, but she will end up being a judge we can trust down the road.
I pray that this is the truth!
Not so fast scooter:
IV. CONCLUSION
The CIA has established that it conducted an adequate search for responsive records with respect to Counts 2 and 5, and that it properly invoked FOIA Exemption 3 and the National Security Act with respect to its withholding of the three records that remain at issue in Counts 4 and 5. Therefore, the agency is entitled to summary judgment on Counts 2, 4, and 5. Liewise, MuckRock has shown that the CIA has enforced a processing policy with respect to requests for emails that contravenes the FOIA, and thus, MuckRock is entitled to summary judgment on Count 7. Accordingly, as set forth in the accompanying Order, both parties' motions for summary judgment are GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART .
You have to dig into each counts to fully understand the significance. But its pretty common for judgements to be granted in part and denied in part, and that by itself would not signify anything nefarious.
A middle of the road friend of mine, not a Q or conspiracy person in the slightest, offered an insight that struck me and gave me pause regarding Ketanji: saying she is not a biologist and cannot tell you what a woman is plays the other way too in that she refused to wade into such a debate implying that if a case was brought before her she would presumably go with the facts brought before her and not her predispositions. We shall see in time.
She's still a pedo enabler, --- despite a handful of cases out of many many that she did okay with. I'd much rather have someone that's not a pedo enabler, who can rule in favor of human life and government overreach. As far as I'm concerned her rulings on pedos will never qualify her for a white hat, and is more or less just the stars aligning on a few of her cases.
The ONLY way the WH theory works is if the lighter sentances were due to cooperation that led to bigger fish in conjunction with providing a superficial sense for the left/pedos that she was on their side enough that they would promote her. It could very well be a part of the biggest military operation the US has ever conducted, but easily could not be at all.
I really wish this movie had subtitles.
I dont think we are reaching our "last hope" not even by a mile!
Is somebody nominated by somebody else who was illegitimately illegally put into that position still legitimate in being nominated?
No, but it makes great Theatre
All they focused on was she was her gender and race. That could end up biting them in the ass! Haha!
Congrats to her for making it to the urgent court as a minority member
I wonder if there is a big upcoming SCOTUS case, even bigger than Roe, where she is a likely "rogue" vote. If that's the case the left will have an insane screaming meltdown over it.
Did I say someone say Election Integrity ?
With what I believe about the way this is all going down. I don't believe for one mimute Joe Bidens administration is picking a Supreme Court Justice.
Exactly, fren. It makes no sense.
What is a woman ?
“ I’m not a biologist “.
Lol
Trust me, SCJ Ketanji Brown Jackson is no WH or any friend to MAGA. To think otherwise is to be addicted to being letdown.
Care to restate that, but with some discussion points?
After her fam's been threatened everything changes.
be a thorn in their side until they grease your palm is how i see her.
Good observation. Consistent with black distrust of government so she may be a plus with some guidance from Thomas. Her rulings on pedos is consistent with blacks tendency to excuse and cover up sex with under age relatives. But it is unlikely any such cases get to the SC.
It's interesting to consider that not that long ago, FBI and CIA were despised by leftists like this judge, while those agencies were considered "patriotic" and law-abiding by most conservatives. Maybe the bigger picture is that most Americans will not have such high regard for either agency in the not-too-distant future.
Leftist Dems always hate any clubs, organizations or government agencies that they don’t fully control. Since they took full control over over the FBI and C_A they now support and like these agencies. This also goes for the military as well, they use to despise the military but now that they are running it and kicking out conservatives, Christians and all non-soyboy males they have come to support and like the military as well.
Hopefully with today's ruling, those corrupt agencies are on notice at worst and are on their way out at best.
That is where everything seems it could be headed
Didn't she also give the pizza actor a free pass for an AR-15 in DC?
She actually sentenced him for a few years.
Wasn't it a suspended sentence?
I dont think so. I remember he was released a year or so ago.
Just hope she didn’t make her Island trip AFTER those rulings.
Good point !
Nawwwwwwwwwwww..... Hard nawwwwwwwwww.....
The main problem I have with her is she is soft on pedophiles. I can't look past that no matter if she is a white hat or not.