Win / GreatAwakening
GreatAwakening
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
GreatAwakening Where We Go Qne, We Go All!
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

301
Trump and Elon both make a post on 1/16/23 @ at 2247 creating a zero delta. Now look at Q post 2247. No coincidences. No Q-incidences!
posted 3 years ago by jhartz39 3 years ago by jhartz39 +301 / -0

Trump post on 1/16/23 @ 2247

https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/109702495721978394

Elon post on 1/16/23 @ 2247

https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1615194151737520128

u/#q2247

73 comments share
73 comments share save hide report block hide replies
Comments (73)
sorted by:
▲ 45 ▼
– TheNickster 45 points 3 years ago +45 / -0

THE STORM IS COMING…

BE PREPARED.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 17 ▼
– Jcholl9 17 points 3 years ago +17 / -0

You’re right on that fren, I believe everything is falling into place… 🌨️

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– deleted 7 points 3 years ago +7 / -0
▲ 7 ▼
– TrustyTrumpenTrumpet 7 points 3 years ago +7 / -0

They make a zero delta with each other at 10:47 (22:47), and post 2247 talks about zero deltas. It's not that the Q post delta lines up, it's that the subject matter lines up with the zero delta.

My two cents anyway

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– deleted 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0
▲ 3 ▼
– Jcholl9 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0

Keeping an open mind yes, retarded no :)

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– AussieSpectator 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0

u/#happening

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– deleted 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0
▲ 2 ▼
– TheNickster 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

Wishing a certain someone would say, “My fellow Americans, the storm is upon us.”

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Jcholl9 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

Well until then here's a cookie for yea... 🍪

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 25 ▼
– MICHIGANisRED 25 points 3 years ago +25 / -0

Interdasting. I'm surprised nobody noticed this five days ago.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 15 ▼
– glompywompy 15 points 3 years ago +15 / -0

I've noticed the best proofs go silent and nobody sees.

The stuff that gets super hyped up the day before or the day of, nothing ever comes of it.

Just a anecdotal pattern Iv3 seen.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– Donny_Fiasco 4 points 3 years ago +4 / -0

One is to grab attention so that you may see the other

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 25 ▼
– Bedminster 25 points 3 years ago +25 / -0

DC has been captured by a foreign aggressor (China), we all know that. The storm is coming, and the military will be taking over for a period of time and then after the arrests and tribunals (200,000+ sealed indictments now) the US will be returned to the sovereign who is Donald J Trump. China stole it and installed the Biden regime. When will it happen? I have no idea, but it's 100% going to happen.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 16 ▼
– DextertheCat 16 points 3 years ago +16 / -0

I'm not certain that China is the enemy here. I think they are having their own struggle with Deep State operatives. I firmly believe that some of them are bought and paid for, but I highly doubt that they are the source. The CCP has its own designs and I'm certain that some or many of them are converts or pawns for the globalists, but I don't believe they are the shot callers. I definitely don't think they have been running with the globalists for long. I think they have only been interesting to the globalists for the last 20-30 years. Prior to that, they were limited in power and influence. Perhaps the globalists got them started on the industrialization path and made headwayinto bringing them to capitalist ideals with bribes and concessions.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 9 ▼
– Awakenednotwoke 9 points 3 years ago +9 / -0

Good analysis. Back in the early 1970s when Kissinger was supposedly sent by Nixon to "open up" China, it was most likely a plan by the Globalist cabal who decided it was time to "open up" one of their covert controlled boogyman territories. Mao was a Central Banker Butt Boy from the git go. China was to be the USA's (most importantly the Constitution's) downfall so the Elite could more easily move the NWO into place.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– deleted 4 points 3 years ago +4 / -0
▲ 9 ▼
– CQVFEFE 9 points 3 years ago +9 / -0

Upvoted for tone and hopium value, even though speculation

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– Slyver 6 points 3 years ago +6 / -0

the US will be returned to the sovereign who is Donald J Trump

I suggest anyone who thinks that getting a "good king" is somehow a good thing has missed the entire purpose of the GA.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– HebsFarm 5 points 3 years ago +5 / -0

"Are you a good king? Or a bad king?"-- " I'm not a king at all! I'm Dorothy Gale, from Kansas."

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Slyver 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

We are most certainly not in Kansas anymore.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– jfunction 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

sov·er·eign (sŏv′ər-ĭn, sŏv′rĭn) n.

  1. One that exercises supreme, permanent authority, especially in a nation or other governmental unit, as: a. A king, queen, or other noble person who serves as chief of state; a ruler or monarch.

This is not the role Trump fills - nor will he ever.

We need to purge the GEOTUS moniker from our MAGA movement. We do NOT want to destroy our constitutional republic with the notion that we want or need a sovereign.

I think it's highly likely that we will have a period of matrial law and many arrests and tribunals and that Trump will soon be found to be the legitimate president.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 17 ▼
– 2ndenthusiast 17 points 3 years ago +17 / -0

Very nice. Guess that closes the book on what side musk is on now.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 9 ▼
– Goldenhawk 9 points 3 years ago +9 / -0

whoa

permalink save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– tattletalestrangler 7 points 3 years ago +7 / -0

I'm a bit confused. I thought for the zero delta posts, q would post first and then Trump. Seems in post 2247 q's post is 0:17 after Trump's.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 10 ▼
– DesertBrat 10 points 3 years ago +10 / -0

I believe that anything under a minute is considered a 0 Delta. Interesting that it's "17" seconds 🐸

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 9 ▼
– CQVFEFE 9 points 3 years ago +9 / -0

But it still has to be Trump posting AFTER, not BEFORE. Anyone could wait for Trump to post, get an alert, and then quickly send a message

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– BumbleHill 7 points 3 years ago +7 / -0

And the posts should be related, this is just stupid.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– jhartz39 [S] 5 points 3 years ago +5 / -0

During the days of Q / Trump Zero Deltas, the zero deltas were used as a way to prove Trump was following or involved with the Q group, thus giving validity to the things Q was saying. Not every zero delta had corresponding or related topics. The deltas were only used to show cooperation between the President and Q.

The zero deltas showed that Trump was following Q and Q was not a larp sitting in his mother's basement gaslighting the public.

The topics of the zero deltas could be meaningless, the important part was the timestamp. Validating Q with Trump's cooperation was the sole purpose of the zero deltas in the initial stages. The corresponding topics with zero deltas came later.

As others here are saying, Q would post first and Trump would post after. This would show that Q was not waiting for Trump to post something and follow up with an immediate post himself. With Q posting first it showed that Trump was following Q.

In this instance with Elon and Trump we are not validating either. We know they both are real people and not larps. In this instance we are only showing they are working together, posting a zero delta with a timestamp that has a corresponding Q post talking about zero deltas. Both Elon and Trump are giving validity to Q in my opinion.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– BumbleHill 4 points 3 years ago +4 / -0

Lol. C'mon, that's retarded.

You could claim a 0 delta with any two people if you take Q drops out of it.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– tattletalestrangler 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0

I don't know. u/jhartz39 does make a good point. Yeah, any two, or more for that matter, people could post at the same time. But the fact that both Trump and Elon did and the timestamps can be linked to a Q post talking about zero deltas is interesting. While I believe that there can be coincidences, maybe this is not a coincidence.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– BumbleHill 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

So if you and I went to Twitter and posted around the same time about a Q post it's a zero delta? The two posts from Elon and Trump weren't even related.

People are ODing on hopium.

permalink parent save report block reply
... continue reading thread?
▲ 1 ▼
– FractalizingIron 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

Heheh. Your reasoning seems kinda foolish. This is NOT just any two people. This is DJT (Q+) and New DJT-like Super Troll Elon Musk. To propose that this could be any two people ignores the highly relevant context.

I'm not saying that the OP is 100% correct. I'm just saying that your argument against the assertion is lame.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– tattletalestrangler 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

Yeah, but in Q post 2247 the example Q uses has Q posting after Trump. Seems odd.

Edit:

Unless Q was just showing 0 delta in general between two posts. But for Trump confirming Q, it would seem the 0 delta would have to be a Q post followed by a Trump post.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– eyerighteye 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

Someone had to say it.

Good call fren. Big stupid.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– jhartz39 [S] 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0

Read my reply to BumbleHill.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– BumbleHill 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

What is going on at this board tonight, it's like everybody took stupid pills and decided to start posting all at once.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Cozette 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

"" Everybody took stupid pills and decided to start posting".

"Everybody" who posted "took stupid pills"? Interesting opinion.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– truthyDOTchurch 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

Check my math..

Q0 = Total number of Q posts talking about 0 deltas

Qt = Total number of Q posts

ET0 = Total number of Elon & Trump 0 deltas

Et = Total number of Elon's tweets

Tt = Total number of Trump's tweets

Probability = Q0/Qt * ET0/MIN(Et,Tt)

Probably pretty close to mathematically impossible.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– BumbleHill 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

That's not how math even works.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– truthyDOTchurch 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

Oh, how embarrassing for me then considering I've studied a ton of math, including probability & statistics.

Can you show me why this wouldn't give a ballpark estimate?

/s cuz I know you cannot. If you could, you would understand how extremely unlikely of a coincidence this is.

Btw calling people retarded is a bad idea because if you're wrong, then you're automatically retarded, instead of just mistaken.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– BasedCitizen 6 points 3 years ago +6 / -0

This is still solid. Even if Musk is trolling with an automated script, he couldn’t line it up with post 2247 without coordinating with Trump. Which brings us full circle back to, not a Q proof, but a proof that Trump and Musk are working together.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– ThinQ 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

But the example shown in Q-Post #2247 is exactly opposite of what you're saying is the definition of a 0D. Trump's timestamp in the Q-Post is 12:05:52am and the corresponding Q-Post has a timestamp of 12:06:09am. According to at least Q-Post #2247, Trump posted first then Q posted. This is shown as a literal definition example of a 0D.

Was there somewhere else that Q specified that Trump should be posting after a Q-Post to make it a 0D? I'm not an "old-timer" like you and several others here so I'm confused by what you're saying.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– tattletalestrangler 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

I'm no Q expert, but certainly Trump posting after Q seems to be a more secure indication of the link between Q and Trump because, as u/CQVFEFE points out, people could have an alert setup when Trump posts and then posts shortly afterwards. The reverse, ie Trump having an alert when Q posts which causes him to create a twitter post shortly afterwards, only confirms the link between Q and Trump.

I assume your question is why would Q show an example of the opposite in one of their posts. I don't have an answer for that.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– ThinQ 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

Agreed regarding the security of the order. That's why the example provided in an actual Q-Post seems odd. Also, I wasn't here when Q was posting so don't know if there was any discussion of this back then and/or if Q either stated or implied a particular order in the 0Ds. If he/they never specified then we can't say this recent occurrence of Trump-Musk "coincidentally timed/synchronized" messages does not count as comms. Anon CQVFEFE stated "it has to be" in a specific order and I'm just trying to determine if I've missed some rule, implied or stated, that would agree with this.

On the other hand, the old "no outside sources" comes into play. There are no coincidences. The one facet pushing this towards a signal of some sort is POTUS posting at 22:47 - and I'm assuming here that this is the time he actually posted and not some other time that someone else retrieved it or such. I've gotten caught up before with assuming a timestamp which was not correct, not sure I fully understand these mechanics of the timestamps.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– DesertBrat 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

Appreciate the info. I never noticed that. And, makes sense. Thanks 👍

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 5 ▼
– catsfive 5 points 3 years ago +5 / -0

I believe Q has specifically stated don't look at the seconds.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– ravonaf 6 points 3 years ago +6 / -0

I've suspected Musk has been part of this from the beginning. Is it at all possible that he didn't actually buy Twitter. That it was seized due to President Trump's executive orders regarding human trafficking? It just seemed like that sale went through way too easily considering the amount of criminality that Twitter was being used for. The globalists don't give up their toys so easily. The entire thing seems like it was part of the show.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– jfunction 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0

Yeah, thought so too.

Appeoval of the deal came through quick and easy with no lawsuits tying it up in court for several months - as might have been expected.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– ThomasMaker 4 points 3 years ago +4 / -0

Still get this:

https://imgur.com/a/RsbW1UD

So for those that also have this issue

https://qanon.pub/#2247

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– therobots 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

Any idea why this error occurs? I also cant see the # U comments.

Brave on android.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– ThomasMaker 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

Nope. Since I have tried turning of every adblocker and scrip manager I have and still its a no-go I have no idea what the issue is..

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– deleted 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0
▲ 2 ▼
– ThomasMaker 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

Tend to filter out all noise online so that explains it, I have 3 adblockers(sites that detect one won't detect the others) and NoScript, I also have literally zero advertising anywhere so for me online is about the information and the content and not the flashy.

my browsing experience is rather, serene....

(I don't understand how people remain themselves(or certain that they are......) with all that constant noise being hosed in through their eyes... I mean we already know that media is a deliberately use brainwashing and influencing tool....)

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– TeaPartySon 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0

Would have been totally cool if was same tweet/TRUTH about the docs

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– GDZeus 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

I use to be able to connect to qagg.news but for the last few weeks I've been unable to, anyone know why?

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– dec3169 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

I think it is either gone or their DNS is screwed.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– gloriatimbers 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

Also,

-Trumps video is 6:29min long and 6+2+9=17

-In Trump's video, Schiff is shown on the ABC TV Show This Week. Elon's post has the word "this" highlighted with star quotes * this *

-The show This Week is in it's 17th season

-Looking at other posts on same date as Qdelta post 9/21/18 shows Trump tweet talking about "Key allies'" - Elon tweet has word "keying" in it

-oh and as a fun bonus, in regards to Elon's tweet, not gonna lie, it is fun trashing Schiff 😂

Maybe there is more, but that's all I got for now

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– JackieDaytona74 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

It could be a coincidence. But given the events of the last two months, difficult to believe that it's a coincidence.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– JFQ17 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

Pretty amazing!

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– FlyingScotzman 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

Epic, and also look at the timestamp the Anon posted the image = 1:16 = 1/16.

permalink save report block reply

Welcome


The Great Awakening


We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.


WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q


Welcome to the Digital Battlefield — Together We Win

Rules


Q Supporters

This is The Great Awakening. Our community is international, focused on helping ourselves and others walk away from the programming, and return our governments to "by the people, for the people!"



Follow the Law

No posts or comments that violate laws in your jurisdiction or the United States. The Feds are always watching!



No Bad Behavior!

No doxing, including revealing personal information of non-public figures, as well as addresses, phone numbers, etc. of public figures. All GAW users must adhere to the highest standards of conduct, whichever .WIN they are on. If we are notified by other moderators of incivil behavior on other .WINs, you WILL be banned here!



Civil Discussion ONLY**

They want you divided.

They want you labeled by race, religion, class, sex, etc.

Divided you are weak [no collective power].

Divided you attack each other and miss the true target [them].



No PAYtriots/No Self Promotion

Linking or promoting merchandise, fundraising, or spamming personal websites, blogs, or channels is not permitted. Do not attempt to profit from Q or advertise for those who do. Peace is the prize. We do it for free.



Questions and Concerns

All moderation questions and concerns should be submitted via modmail. DO NOT GRIEF the mods.



Expand your thinking

Remember, this .WIN is the public face of the Great Awakening, and, as a member here, you agree to represent the Great Awakening movement against Globalism, Communism and Progressive Insanity in the best, most positive way possible. NOTE: Your comments and posts may become news. Keep it classy!

This is not a 'fringe conspiracy' site: Visit https://conspiracies.win if that's your thing!



No doomers or shills

If you can't use common sense, you'll get banned without hesitation. If you're a shill, you fall under this rule. If you're a doomer, you fall under this rule as you just add garbage to the site like the other two. This includes forum sliding.



General Rules

  • Mods will issue NO warnings, followed by temporary bans and/or permanent bans. DO NOT GRIEF THE MODS.

  • Keep posts related to topics Q has raised or that are current.

  • Keep post duplication (especially from other .WINs) to a minimum.

  • HIGH EFFORT, HIGH-INFO posts only! Please respect other readers' time. Please use descriptive titles. No URLs in titles, pls. No clickbait.

  • No fame-fagging; no, "your" post did not get removed! Were you the original author?? Eyes on the prize, people!

  • Memes encouraged, but no low-quality, low-info posts.

  • Keep it honest and accurate.

  • GAW Supporters ONLY. (Sorry, the train had no brakes.)

  • Handshake noobs will be scrutinized by their Q knowledge, sincerity, and respect.

  • Remember, your conduct here represents the Q movement! OUR ENEMIES ARE WATCHING!

  • Please direct all complaints to modmail first!


Resources


WELCOME TO THE DIGITAL BATTLEFIELD


"River of Search" script:


GAW post formatting tips


Q Research (Q only posts at 8kun)


Q post archives (qagg.news) others 1 2 3 4


Browse Drops from the beginning


QProofs.com


Learn to read the Q map


Book of Q Proofs v1.3 (pdf)


Law of War & Majic Eyes Qnly Resources


Trumps twitter archive


POTUS: The Calm Before The Storm


Pedosta and DNC dumps


GIFs & QPosts


Poll Post Format


SPY ON US! See: mod Logs


The Greatest Show on Earth!


New to Q? "The Earth Chronicles Ep 12: Q & The White-Hat Op: What's Real, What's Not?"


Moderators

  • dropgun
  • catsfive
  • AutoMod
  • Filter
  • Fatality
  • Qanaut
  • bubble_bursts
  • Brent75
  • and 5 more...
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026.02.01 - w2qgj (status)

Copyright © 2026.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy