Think about it: a lot of the judges who shot them down were even Trump-appointed judges. Were the lawyers involved in these suits too stupid to know what would and wouldn't get them standing?
I've thought about this a lot. Thought about how much harder fraud is to prove than simply proving that an election shouldn't stand based on what factually occurred at the time, whether it was intentional or not. It's like putting the thumb on your opponent's scale. Any good lawyer knows that when a higher charge is too iffy, you settle for the lesser charge. I keep looking at all these suits and they keep trying to prove in court that there was fraud, which is intentional, which would not only require the actions observed and recorded, but proof that what was happening was coordinated and intentional, which, of course, they're not going to have all of that. Or maybe they do (I think they do), but the plan called for Donald to play shadow president for 4 years while fake Biden takes the country seemingly to the edge of oblivion.
But when you think in terms of the Q plan, how it had to be this way, despite all of Trump's grandstanding and huffing and puffing about the election, to see all these highly capable lawyers just get swatted away left and right by judges all over the country...something doesn't smell right to me. Something tells me all the lawyers fighting for Trump (perhaps with the exception of the Mormon trumpet players from Utah) were part of the show. They brought intentionally weak cases that wouldn't qualify for standing so they could appear to be trying to fight this in court, when they really had no intention of doing so, because it would be almost too easy to prove, and putting Trump right back into the White House wasn't part of the plan right now.
So here we are, huffing and puffing about this painfully obvious fact that the election was stolen and no judge will even taken the case and suddenly I'm thinking..."Oh shit. Maybe the patriots have more control than I thought."
I don’t have the sauce handy, but there was an interview recently where President Trump said we will be able to do things now that we couldn’t have if he had been successful challenging the 2020 election. I think that lends credence to your theory.
To me that just points back to the military being the only way. Trump reinstated by legal manipulation is Trump still shackled by the left's law fare and the RINOs in Congress.
I think the main reason Trump cannot be reinstated is because there are necessary things about to happen that you would NOT want him to be president for. This is going to be hung around Biden's neck
Old School Birther here. I could never understand how the left defused Sheriff Joe Arpaio and his lead investigator Mike Zullo. The evidence of forgery (on several documents) was slap-in-your-face obvious, but somehow it all fizzled out. The nail in the coffin was when they made up some lame charges and the Sheriff "lost" his re-election bid to the Soros backed Paul Penzone.
But now seeing the WHOLE plan come together, letting the Sheriff expose Bathhouse Barry too early would've limited the distance this enormous sting operation had to go. Maybe the white hats told the sheriff to back off and "Watch the show".
Never gave birthers any attention, but the presentation by Zullo was impossible to ignore. Just learning that the certificate was a build up of layers (These people are stupid) makes it open and shut.
Glad you took the time to see his presentation. Back in the day I was crazy enough to download the PDF and show the layers to my coworkers. They all thought it was a glitch.
Now I wonder if the White Hats snuck that in there knowing that autists like us would find it. 👀
He didn't say it quite like that, he said we're going to be able to do things you never thought possible because of how crazy they've been, much more than if we had done this the normal way (meaning consecutive terms). He has actually been saying this a lot lately, he said it in two recent speeches and also the Bannon interview.
^^^
Thank you! I was going off the top of my head.
Yes. He said this during the Brannon interview. It stood out to me too.
Remember when it seemed like state legislatures were going to take back their power but they got calls from Trump and then did nothing?
I believe a wise source once told us 2020 was not another 4 year election
I will go a step further. I think that all of the arguments that Trump's lawyers made in those cases were tailor made to mirror the accusations that the swamp's lawyers are going to make when they try to overturn Trump's victory in 2024. It was never about getting the election thrown out, it was all about setting precedent. TX v PA is probably the biggest example of this imo.
Great thought. Also, military court supercedes civilian court during Continuity of Government.
Wouldn’t it have been easier just to prove election fraud in 2020, fix the issue, and be done with it?
No. That would have been one battle won, but we’re trying to win the overall war, not just a battle along the way.
Q told us "This is not simply another four-year election” and there are a lot of things that needed to happen (Afghanistan, Ukraine, Taiwan, Federal Reserve, etc) and things that needed to be exposed (all our corrupted institutions) while Trump is out of office. The ‘20 election was allowed to be stolen, that much is obvious because Trump made Executive Orders to deal with the election fraud long in advance.
Then you wouldn't have Biden in office to absorb the blame for Afghanistan withdrawal, Putin's operation in Ukraine, the impending death of the dollar etc. All things that need to be done to drain the swamp, but would have ruined Trump politically and probably resulted in a successful impeachment.
I’ve thought the same thing. Everything that happened with the court cases was intentional. Think how many sealed indictments there were even in late 2020. Many of those judges were blackmailed/compromised by the deep state. So the white hats either threw the cases or talked to the judges.
Nov 2020 - Dec 2021 was the longest year. Losing court case after court case. Being here helped because we could at least “see” that things were happening but amidst all the darkness, it was hard to keep the faith, while everyone stayed asleep and many of us had to fight our companies’ mandates and had our families ripped apart over the vaccines.
I still wonder if the white hats used the AZ audit data in military tribunals.
https://qalerts.app/?n=3387
3387
Jul 09, 2019 12:46:46 PM EDT
Q !!mG7VJxZNCI
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G2qIXXafxCQ
Listen very carefully (again).
Note past (2) years.
Note next (6) years.
You were told what was going to happen.
You were told what battles we face.
Strategic.
Pre_planned.
Patriots in control.
Q
I think about this drop and a part of me thinks "crap we've got two more years ro go", but if I step back and look around at what is happening all over the place, that seems about right. It does seem that we are on a path of convergence. I just hope we make it.
The timing of the Q plan/devolution etc had to coincide with moment of the Financial demolition. Things like election fraud are cornerstone for the devolution and from that view point you are spot on.
All the lawfare (No standing, civil liability, classified docs, etc) is there to display the corruption in the legal system just as COVID was to display the corruption in the medical system, the lack of action of both the above is there to display the corruption of the legislatures, and the gaslighting (and censoring of dissenting points of view) by the media is to display their complicity in it all.
Left out exposure of the incompetent education system, which engaged parents will never be able to forget.
Nice post. The fact is that almost no one was aware of wide-spread voter fraud until 2020. I've been pretty red-pilled and I didn't really know. Just vague suspicions.
Evidence that letting voter fraud happen is a White Hat plan: The voter fraud didn't work in 2016. "They never thought she would lose." If the Trump team could stop voter fraud in 2016, they are capable of doing so, and did not do it in 2020 for a reason.
I love it when a plan comes together.
If so, it's nice that "the plan" remains the top priority, but too bad that the president had to be dragged through the mud for it.
Right. Like he says, he doesn’t need this, he has a good life already, he could just retire and live easy but he does it for us. He wouldn’t even take pay.
Truly a man who has found a higher calling.
"I take all these slings and arrows for you."
-Trump's "Washington Establishment" speech
I’ve been saying this for awhile, I believe the judges may have been asked to stand down, just like all the congressmen and senators on Jan 6 who were gonna object to the electors, this has to look organic to the normies. I also think Pence was instructed by Trump to not send back the electors.
You basically nailed it. Everything is a White Hat OP right now. It's the drip to get it into the minds of the populace. That's why huge BOOMS are released then "yanked away" for a bit like the Laptop from Hell, Election Fraud, etc. Giving too much would spoil the full plan out the gate when the time is not ready.
This is a great point. There were a whole litany of cases punted for "no standing" including the SCOTUS PA vs TX case. Ted Cruz was involved in that. Cruz is a Rhodes Scholar who clerked for like Scalia or one of the justices. Cruz is no dummy and wouldn't put his name on something that wasn't airtight. And yet it got punted. On the other cases, are we to believe that the dems/left were able to intimidate, buy off, or threaten 50+ judges without a peep?
We are so focused on an election as we should. But I think Trump has a truly bigger vision. Trump isn't just trying to win an election but rather to destroy Fraud Inc or "the swamp".
Let's say several of those cases did go through, like PA vs TX. Biden was removed from office or at minimum the election was nullified. Trump assumes office. Then what? 1/3 of the US population would believe Trump was "installed" as president by SCOTUS. If we can overturn an election, couldn't the Dems do the same under the pretext of "fraud"? I think we could have seen a "hot" civil war in some cases with states like NY or CA wanting to secede.
The courts were never the way. The infrastructure of Fraud Inc - financing, key players, allies, etc - needs to be destroyed. The rot is too deep. We could have easily won in 2020 only to lose the larger war.
I like it
I can see that and have kinda been thinking along these same lines a bit though at first I didn’t get it.
The plan has always required the economic collapse of the US and the currency reset. There are several events that needed to occur to make this happen, but a big one was the switch from LIBOR to SOFR. This was originally scheduled to happen on 31 Dec. 2021, but it was pushed back to 30 June 2023. This time, it looks like it is going to stick.
There was never ANY possibility Trump wanted to be holding the reins when this occurs. Nobody wants to be responsible for this. That is why we have Biden the puppet in place to take the fall. And that is why we got all these weird extensions of Trump's executive orders that made no sense.
This continuous kicking of the economic can down the road because the banks weren't ready is the source of all these maddening extensions and "hurry up and wait" fraud investigations. Things needed to be delayed until the economy was ready for the disaster everyone knows is coming.
Again, until the curtain comes down on the US economy, the plan can't start. Hopefully, the LIBOR->SOFR transition on June 30 is the last piece. If you thought the economic pain has been bad so far, you haven't seen anything yet. But once we're through it, declas can begin.
Great post, you get it.
What's the best financial move in anticipation of this you think? Gold?
I think so. Physical gold with no counter party risk. That and prayer.
I expect it to be rough. I'm sure there are optimal strategies and a select few will become very rich by buying up distressed assets at the right time, but I wouldn't presume to know how to do that. I'm anticipating an intense battle to win over the public to competing monetary systems, and a whole lot of confusion and gaslighting in the process.
Me like
Just wait until Trump loses 2024 on purpose so patriots can spend 4 more years collecting evidence?
Exactly, the real money is in lost elections.
A twisted, but somehow comforting conclusion.
I think you are correct. "It had to be this way." I do think Trump will be back before 2025. A lot of things worldwide have to happen for that, but I think it is better than a 50/50 probability. Option 2 is that 2020 election is turned over after Trump is in office and all of the judges, laws, budgets, EOs, etc. during Bidan's time will be rendered null and void. I think something similar will happen to Obama's time in office.
Soooo.... are we going to see mass, ridiculous level-cheating by the white hats (like they did in 2016 - remember how mad Hilary was, she had been TOLD that she had it in the bag - but something happened to flip the election in Trump's favour.
Have judges just spent 3 years setting precedents that mean that no matter what, they cannot overturn white hats cheating?
I think that's so ass backwards if that's what "the plan" is, how does anyone in the world ever get fair elections back if that's the game plan.
I think you have this all wrong..."ridiculous level-cheating by the white hats".
From what I (and most everyone else on here) have read by reading the Q drops, it was the cheating done by the D party and Hillary's team that was stopped by the White Hats in 2016 to allow for the real numbers to show up, instead of their manipulated ones (as what happened in 2020).
You may have to rethink you're understanding of the Plan and what it's all about.
Ok maybe I didn't write that very clearly. What happened in 2016 with Trump's victory enraged the cabal. Hilary was more than certain that she was going to win. The only reason you can more than certain you are going to win a democratic election, is if it is rigged. If it was rigged, how could Trump have won?
Surely, it's not a massive leap of logic to understand that to win at a rigged game, you have to be better at cheating than the other guy? I don't doubt for one second that Trump got more votes that Hilary got, but we saw with 2022 that you can't outvote an enemy who will do as much cheating as necessary to win. Ergo the white hats cheated better than the cabal.
I don't see any benefit in getting precedents in the law books that the judiciary cannot intervene in elections where there is massive and obvious cheating - unless you intend to expose the ridiculouslessness of the current (and surely everyone agrees) completely broken voting systems around ClownWorld nations? What use are those legal precedents unless you (or they - the White Hats) want to first exploit, and then use that exploitation to demonstrate to the sheeple how deeply, manifestly broken elections are in the US. Hence my comment about the white hats intending to deploy (81 million votes from my basement) level of cheating in 2024.
SImilarly, I don't see how trying to make sense out of what are otherwise useless legal precedents, is being a shill or a troll. But I guess it takes all sorts.
Although, I am completely open to anyone explaining another rationale for why it's good to have precedents established that establish you can cheat to your heart's content because the there is no amount of proof that is sufficient to encourage the judiciary to rule that cheating is bad
I still will state that the White Hats didn’t “cheat”, but they stopped the cheat of the D party to show the vote to win 2016.
We can agree to disagree on this point, but I appreciate your time in the lengthy response.
I’ve been traveling and am tired, but didn’t want to not answer you.
Thank you. That was thoughtful of you. I am continually impressed at the wonderful people on this site. I come here and I so often leave with more hope than when I arrived. This reply topped up my reserves. o7
We both can agree on the fact that there are wonderful people on this site!
I'm still lost. Did someone talk about precedent?
I'm not sure what you're saying.
see my comment above
Um, I think you are confused. White hats are the good guys Standing for Truth and JUSTICE and unless you can clarify yourself a bit better, you strike me as a shill and a troll.
see my comment above
This isnt even hopium. This is copium.
You might be on the wrong site.
Yeah deport time.