As some may know, the SCOTUS docketed the Brunson case on June 22nd. They began hearing the case and should have a decision by Saturday June 24th. The results would lead to annulment of the 2020 Election which would dissolve the Biden Administration and the majority of Congress for not investigating the fraud of the 2020 election.
SCOTUS could have denied it on Thursday but are continuing arguments. The case was accepted under a rule 11. A rule 11 has never been docketed in this manner by anyone outside of a federal government case that was brought in the 1970's. Rule 11 means the case is of imperative public importance (SCOTUS had to decide that and docket this in that manner).
Prayers up warriors - I know the Brunson case has received many critics but this would definitely qualify as a swamp flush.
If the SC were to affirm the case, and annul the election, the beaurocracy, the press, the Congress, and Biden would just refuse to act on it. We would be down to one solution.
Military is the only way.
The only other remote possibility is a mass population uprising, and there are still a shit load of dumb ass sheeple out here.
Well they are already illegitimate in my eyes... this would just confirm their illegitimacy and allow for the military to round them up in the manner they see fit.
Yep. If SCOTUS makes a ruling, but the MSM never reports on it (or worse, says the opposite happened,) who's to say otherwise?
Interesting timing that we just had Murdering Joe Scarborough talking about how SCOTUS has no credibility now because of the fAr RiGhT.
The election was basically a flex to see how far they could push exactly that, from my point of view. That they can say Biden won against all evidence to the contrary, against all evidence of burned Trump votes, shredded ballots in trucks, and "lost" and "mismanaged" ballots, the Bellwethers, the number of counties, etc.
They wanted to see how far they could jam through using the government and Mockingbird apparatus.
I'm so sorry. How is your husband doing?
I kinda blame covid for my current heart blockage because they closed down the gyms and most kinds of exercise really don't work well for me and actually cause more stress than less.
Exactly.
nattokinase, lumbrokinase and dreambody.clinic
(((Big Hugs))) I'm sorry. I hope he is recovering well.
If this does happen to go our way, guarantee that patriots will be taking the streets. Could very well become the precipice. (not that I am advocating violence)
Username checks out.
It makes sense why it would happen, you got Antifa and other retards owned by the DS who will send them out for scorched earth policies given they know their time has finally come.
Seeing what happened in 2020 with the constant insurrections and how many idiots went out to riot and whatnot, perhaps the US Military will too occupied or busy to handle them since their main objectives are to go after the real threats seated in power which exceeds everything else firsthand.
Yes, I think the current admin ignoring Scotus at that magnatude of a decision would be possible cause a military intervention.
Plus news recently that the dems are looking to stack more justices. I think its time for justice to swing its heavy hand on these commies.
well it SHOULD! I certainly hope so.
The Two Presidents prophecy.
Ohhhh!!!! I like it! When I think of that I think about how we kind of have two presidents but not in a way most people are aware of. If they ruled on this and Trump was put in office and Biden didn’t leave, THAT would be an obvious Two Presidents scenario. Good thing Trump has is own White House already!
In case anyone is wondering about the supreme court's rule 11 ...
https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-1999-title28a-node337-part3-rule11&num=0&edition=1999#:~:text=A
Rule # 11, Part III. Are you kidding me? Once "11.3" verifies as first marker....... Oh, shit.
I like it.
Trumps trumpets. (They all play them)
LET'S FUCKIN GO, BABY!
Cmon SCOTUS, don't shit the bed!
Multiple freaking meanings is taking to a whole new level with that Idea.
You have fulfilled my hopium quota for the day!
Thank you!
The best thing about this case is that GEOTUS has nothing to do with it. This is a grassroots effort. Optics are everything.
It would be the perfect trigger. No one can call Trump a dictator in this scenario. The left would cry that he used the military to force a coup.
This should be stickied... we need prayer and energy!!
Amen.
Durham just put a set of facts on the record in front of Congress,
Stated that he won’t discuss under things under seal
And now this?
Okay, you’ve got my attention.
I love it. I donated a ton of $$$ to Brunson bro's. Got the printed copy of their original SCOTUS complaint and a letter with it.
Pressure is pressure. Even if it is thrown out. We're pushing, their case is solid AF. Even if the SCOTUS "can't" fully hear it due to political pressure, it's a brilliant case and 100% legitimate/grounded in the law.
Fuck it, I'm in. Always have been.
I did hear from a 3rd party source in a video that... and im not sure if this is legal, SCOTUS was advising them / pressuring them to push this case a certain way.
Who knows if that is true or not, as it would either mean SCOTUS is defining their own cases... but the case does have my attention as it feeds all of our ideas that there is something big happening behind the scenes and we know 2024 election is NOT it.
The push was from a SCOTUS clerk… They con-fir with their justice all the time. It remains to be said the clerk was being fed.
https://static-assets-1.truthsocial.com/tmtg:prime-ts-assets/media_attachments/files/110/573/369/156/807/508/original/2b23b0b6dff1c07f.jpg
https://truthsocial.com/users/lastminutesewing/statuses/110591944916990038
There are videos posted that cover the Brunson case in detail.
It has made its rounds to SCOTUS 2 times before and has been rejected immediately.
Each time however the Brunsons have changed their approach.
This time is unique as its under Rule 11.
When a case is docketed the SCOTUS reviews the arguments and decides if they want to take it to trial for a verdict. In this scenario, the fact that they are holding multiple days of discussions on it is interesting.
Its in oral arguments and has been going on for a couple days - that is the sauce. Maybe we will know more next week on whether SCOTUS is going to take it to trial and decision.
https://truthsocial.com/users/Sapioplex/statuses/110575386184787756
There are two different cases, from two of the Brunson brothers. I'm not sure the difference between the two. I saw an interview with Loy a few days ago, and the person never asked him how this one was different.
IIRC, One of the Brunsons sued 3 SCOTUS justices in local court. This put it on the local judge to decide if the justices were following the Constitution or not. It looked like he built a nice trap.
If true, this would be amazing!
And a royal swamp flush at that!
One way of the many previously unimaginable ways to win. Thanks for the update.
America has got a major case of swamp butt! It’s time for the flush!
Swamps been circling the drain for 6 1/2 yrs now... only a few more swirls and then... pass the air freshener. And a courtesy flush wouldn't hurt.
Great that the court will be invalidated even further prior to the precipice. The military is the only way and the people have to be shown. Cheers to the Brunsons for being the trumpets
We're on our 3rd named storm Cindy, just saw that earlier. Next one will be Don!
Beautiful. Don the storm has arrived.
It’s very strange they keeping kicking it down the road, almost like they are waiting for the perfect time to act.
Guys,
I don't think anything will happen with this case.
But to think about this more. This would be the PERFECT white hat move.
Trump would not be the cause of overturning the 2020 election. The military wouldn't be either.
To have normal citizens doing it would be a good move.
I admire their tenacity and legitimacy of their claims, unfortunately they cannot and will not win due to the innumerable LEGAL (but not LAWFUL) ways to wrangle out of it on a "technicality". And there are literally dozens of "technicalities" they can invoke, because they created them for just such a purpose in the first place.
Nonetheless, I'd love to be wrong about this, but it's a massive longshot. I'll happily eat my humble pie if I'm wrong.
They weren't hearing the case, it was a conference to decide whether it should go to a full hearing. His brother's case was very similar or maybe the same (I haven't heard anyone tell us how they were different), and that one came up for consideration twice and they decided not to send the case forward twice already.
If I am not mistaken, this is the first time it made it to conference.
I believe it's the 1st time that Loy's case made it to conference. His brother's case, however, made it to conference twice and wasn't put forward for trail either time. The other brother's case was Raland J Brunson v Alma S Adams.
I gotta say it. The Brunson Burner
This is the way God would do it, He wants all the credit
Based on the numerous interviews I've watched with 2 of the Brunson brothers, this case being considered by SCOTUS is not about "annulling" the 2020 election. At all. It's about Biden/Harris/Cabinet members (and most members of the U.S. House & Senate) not having written, sworn oaths to the Constitution being on file (after no docs returned after FOIA requests were submitting asking for proof of their oaths of office).
All these UN-elected officials have to do to remedy this is to get ole Hussein's forger team (although the Hawaii lady died in a plane crash - the only one to die on that plane) and whip up some fake, certified "oaths of office" and retro-date them with a fake notary stamp. These criminals can fake a President's birth certificate and steal 50 states of elections - repeatedly - at will. We're supposed to believe that these frauds won't just whip up some fake documents to cover their tracks?
The "remedy" requested in the Brunson case could POTENTIALLY remove around 85% of Congress members (AS IF anyone would actually go along with that and execute the SCOTUS court order), but it would not "reverse" or "annul" the 2020 election.
Biden/Harris could possibly be removed from office - but for completely different reasons (not for stealing the election). And this case (IF it even gets moved forward to a hearing - IF 4 of the 9 SCOTUS Justices vote to move the case to a hearing - after denying it from a hearing twice before already) would in no way put Trump back into office as the President (where he rightfully belongs) as if he had won the election.
Again, I say all this based on numerous interviews with Brunson brothers that I've watched. I'm not an attorney and don't play one on TV either. I've read enough of the case legal-speak to have some sense of what the case is about.
Are you possibly talking about a different (the other) Brunson case perhaps?
It addresses both from what I gather from the conclusion. Remove them from congress and revisit the other Brunson case.
Conclusion:
This petition is set forth in the interest of justice in protecting Brunson’s right to petition for a redress of grievances that needs this Court’s supervisory power to be protected, and to cure the national security breach as stated above, and to ensure the right of due process against the encroachment of the doctrine of equitable maxim is protected, and charging the Respondents who failed to investigate the allegations of a breach in our election by having them removed from office without further delay for the violation of their oath of office.
https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/22/22-1028/264270/20230425133210857_20230425-132551-00002580-00000251.pdf
Oh Heavenly Father, Please let your Spirit guide the Supreme Court to fight the evil that is everywhere. Let them be brave and come to a unanimous decision that Brunson wins the case, all guilty parties are rounded up and President Trump is back in office.Through your son, Jesus Christ, Amen.
Maybe wishful thinking, but it would be just in time for an awesome independence day!🧨🧨
https://twitter.com/BrunsonSCOTUS/status/1666113732076765186/photo/1
Well things have been heating up and would make next week great if won. I do not expect it too but sure hoping so, and things have been getting stranger like we are at the final act or in it
I don't suppose there is any chance of undoing over 100 years of fraudulent elections and unconstitutional laws....
Unconstitutional Laws Started with 15 Statutes at Large, about half way through....
That is how far we have to go backwards in time to begin removing Bad Laws, bad regs, bad other, and if done correctly, might just kick the Southern States right back out of Congress and place them right back into the Southern Confederacy, but for sure it will reinstate the Original 13th Amendment, The Titles of Nobility Amendment that gives Teeth to the Titles of Nobility Clause within the body of the Constitution, and undo the Current 13th, 14th and 15th, Reconstruction Amendments, not to mention all the other stupid crap amendments....
https://www.loc.gov › item › llsl-v15 U.S. Statutes at Large, Volume 15 (1867-1869), 40th Congress. Created / Published United States, 1867 - 1869 Headings - Law - Law Library - United States - Congress - Statutes at large - Bills and legislation - Periodical Genre Periodical
If SCOTUS passes this that means they're gonna have to bump the black chick off, right?
A bunch of people here may be misunderstanding what happened on Jun 22nd. That is the conference date for the case, the first time that the justices and their clerks will even have looked at it. All that would have been decided at that conference is whether they will eventually take the case ("grant cert" in the lingo).
So eventually we'll see in the regular court orders (check the calendar to supremecourt.gov to see the release dates) either that cert was denied or that it was granted and the case has been scheduled to be heard sometime in the 2023 session which starts this fall and runs into early 2024. So no big excitement anytime soon, no ten-days and July 4th excitement possibilities here.
Rule 11 is a bit of a red herring here. It says that the court will not hear a case still active in a lower court (as this one is - it's 23-4042 in the Tenth Circuit) unless there is some pressing reason to deviate from the normal process where we wait until the lower court has ruled so that there's something to appeal. It's up to the Court to decide whether this is a rule 11 situation - they're under no obligation to take the take the case just because Brunson claimed rule 11 when they filed.
Sounds fake
While highly doubtful that SCOTUS has the testicular fortitude to do such a thing... the timing is very odd being that we're so close to the 4th of July.
I would expect them to vote against Brunson or kick the can down the road.
Help me. I'm trying not to get my hopes up.
Keep your faith in God… every failure or denies cases are just lessons from God to lead to the success case, if successful and win, only need one
Amen.
I posted this on twitter somebody commented it was dismissed yesterday. Any way to verify?
I think it would be hilarious if they overturn the steal.
Thank you for the update.
Cert denied - page 7 of the today's (Monday June 26) orders.
While reading the comments something came to mind. I know the brothers are/were suing some of the SCOTUS justices, but I don't know which ones. What if they are/were suing them so they could not be part of the "election" case? Wouldn't they have to recuse themselves from any case involving the brothers if they're being sued by them? If so, wouldn't that have been a strategic move by the brothers, again depending on which justices they are suing?
how long between tomorrow and independence day? oh, bout... 10 days
Makes me wonder, is Jimmy Carter is still on hosp(ice)???