Yep, and he's been on team evil for a long time. He just realizes the house of cards is coming down and he's looking to win favors with the good guys. Bandwagoner. We should expect to see a lot of members of team evil doing this soon, just to save their a$$e$
Don't kid yourself, he made a deal with Trump. He's in the red shoe club & knows but maybe not quite as evil as some of the others (Trump would know) and because of his reach, he is worth if for the optics for the normies
Why are you continuing to say how he's flipped? Even if he is cooperating it's not because he suddenly became a good guy, it's just to save himself from a fate like No name, he still won't escape justice.
IDK but that's what I meant by "flipped" just what you wrote: "he is cooperating it's not because he suddenly became a good guy, it's just to save himself from a fate"
Isn't that what flipped means? Of course he'll have to face justice but if Trump made him a deal for the optics work he is now doing that deal will be honored, whatever it may be
Well, you know, he wasn't wrong. There is/was a lot of crazy there. In what they affectionately refer to as "Qanon". They refer to their image of the large movement and collective that connected themselves to Q. They do not think in terms of "Q". They only think in terms of the collective connected to the posts that were signed by Q. This is "Qanon".
And, yeah, there was a lot of nonsense that emerged within that a community. Think Charlie Ward, for example. That's the very reason why Q had to emphasize, at the end, there is Q and there are anons. Different entities.
I don't fault him for not going there, although I suspect that privately, he probably does.
Whats' really significant is that his comment gives social permission to his audience, lefties all, to consider that the Q movement, aka "Qanon" actually had some value. That's a big step in terms of public narrative and the Overton Window.
Maher was outted by Q as a pedo
A gave him a choice
Maher has been cooperating for several years now
He’s working to bridge the divide between Left and Right
He was walking in red shoes = He is Hugh Hefners's child?
Critical thinking this ain't.
(PS, As for Red Shoes, my dad actually owned and wore a pair. So, is he Hugh Hefner's child, or a member of the Red Shoe club?)
You cannot reach a sane and realistic conclusion by jumping to conclusions and pushing confirmation bias based on one or two data point. Like someone wearing red shoes.
But put together a collection of data points, and work through them with critical thinking, this can lead you to informed and reasonable conclusions.
One reason there are not more people awake in the world is that too large a percentage of people who consider themselves awake [not normies] simply do not do that.
Too many leave one mentally controlled silo for another. The way to break out is to [critical thinking] + [reason] + [research] + [avoidance of confirmation bias] + [self reflection: thinking processes, emotional processes, action steps], etc.
Red shoes aside, I'm just wondering how you construe being part of the Red Shoes club as meaning he's Hefner's child. (But, seriously, actually, i think you just gave a misplaced answer on a different topic. That was my point.)
Now kindly FO
Chirpy Fellow!
Hey, I hope you have a great day, and your contributions here continue to be as plentiful and profound as they have been up to this point!
I keep seeing the pizza/red-shoes “comms” thing come up, and honestly it’s never really added up for me.
It looks like people are actively hunting for pizza or red shoe references tied to liberals, and once they spot one it’s an automatic guilty verdict.
But that same mindset magically disappears when it’s someone they agree with.
The First Lady has worn red heels plenty of times and nobody reads anything into it. Trump’s been publicly seen eating and handing out pizza with police in D.C., and suddenly pizza is just… pizza.
Which makes sense, because pizza is one of the most common foods in the country. Also, let’s be real, I’m pretty sure most people here still eat pizza themselves. Nobody’s swearing it off because of “comms.” If it means nothing when we eat it, why is it an automatic guilty verdict when we see liberals enjoying a slice?
And red shoes aren’t exactly rare either. Louboutin built an entire brand around red soles.
If pizza or red shoes are supposed to mean something, then they have to mean the same thing every time. If they don’t count in one case, they can’t magically become proof in another just because it’s a different person.
At that point it stops being analysis and turns into pattern hunting to support a belief. That’s how things get stretched so far they start hurting credibility.
And just to head this off: Saying “Trump was sending a message” after the fact doesn’t prove intent. If any pizza or red shoes reference can be called a “signal” no matter what, then it’s not evidence, it’s just a story people fit around whatever happens.
That's a non apology for something you literally can't gaslight people into thinking isn't real anymore. It's funny how the anons still get shit on as crazy, when 90% of what we said was truth backed up with the sauce.
he knows the correct name
Yep, and he's been on team evil for a long time. He just realizes the house of cards is coming down and he's looking to win favors with the good guys. Bandwagoner. We should expect to see a lot of members of team evil doing this soon, just to save their a$$e$
It will wake up the normies quicker. But sorry Bill, no deals.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but is anyone else curious/surprised Bill Maher wasn't in the Epstein file release?
Yes. I thought he was one of the red shoes people.
He is
He definitely is.
He is, I don't understand why all these people are shilling for him, it doesn't make him any less evil.
Bill Maher is on my bingo card as Deep Cover.
Been pointing at it for a while now. Could be wrong, but he’s too logical.
“Logic” and “Leftist” just don’t mix. I’m not buying him being anything but an actor until shown otherwise.
🤔 He did kinda start to flip on a dime ...
Really, the only question is if he was always deep cover, or if it was part of a deal.
Don't kid yourself, he made a deal with Trump. He's in the red shoe club & knows but maybe not quite as evil as some of the others (Trump would know) and because of his reach, he is worth if for the optics for the normies
Damned Skippy he does!
"Playing dumb is his favorite role"
I mean, aside from eating kids all the red shoe club...
u/#catdance
He's an ass hat.
Hefner's offspring
!
for sure but he must have flipped & is now doing important optics work
Why are you continuing to say how he's flipped? Even if he is cooperating it's not because he suddenly became a good guy, it's just to save himself from a fate like No name, he still won't escape justice.
IDK but that's what I meant by "flipped" just what you wrote: "he is cooperating it's not because he suddenly became a good guy, it's just to save himself from a fate"
Isn't that what flipped means? Of course he'll have to face justice but if Trump made him a deal for the optics work he is now doing that deal will be honored, whatever it may be
He’s a pedovore
...and he's eaten babies, too...
A reasonable person would ask the question: "If Q was right about this, then what else were they right about?"
But he doesn't go there...
Well, you know, he wasn't wrong. There is/was a lot of crazy there. In what they affectionately refer to as "Qanon". They refer to their image of the large movement and collective that connected themselves to Q. They do not think in terms of "Q". They only think in terms of the collective connected to the posts that were signed by Q. This is "Qanon".
And, yeah, there was a lot of nonsense that emerged within that a community. Think Charlie Ward, for example. That's the very reason why Q had to emphasize, at the end, there is Q and there are anons. Different entities.
I don't fault him for not going there, although I suspect that privately, he probably does.
Whats' really significant is that his comment gives social permission to his audience, lefties all, to consider that the Q movement, aka "Qanon" actually had some value. That's a big step in terms of public narrative and the Overton Window.
You're correct, but how many reasonable people do you know day-to-day?
Good point. Most of them are here.
Bwahahahahahhha!
Not his role.
His job is to wake up the reachable brainwashed people who are drowning in smug ego.
Wait till he finds out about the red shoe club. I believe he owns a pair.
He does. The degenerate.
Mr. Red Shoes club member? Nice try, sumbag
Kid Love Productions..... 🤮
yep, that too...
I wonder if he's been replaced
Idk. He doesn’t seem important enough to be replaced…. But he could be.
He's Hefner's son, hefner had all those underground tunnels and video tapes he was also a honey pot operation just like Epstein.
Oh wow I knew he was a monster, I didn’t know he was hefners son….
Maher was outted by Q as a pedo A gave him a choice Maher has been cooperating for several years now He’s working to bridge the divide between Left and Right
Plausible.
u/#q4912
THIS is what I came to post. ThankQ
Welcome, fren.
Guess the question will be asked everywhere soon - who is Q......
Cant wait!
Wait!
Someone needs to ask him about his red shoes and the group of men he was photographed with all wearing the same.
https://i.redd.it/l7t16fsh2f931.jpg
Is Bill married? Girlfriends?
Idk but he's Hugh Hefners son
According to..... ?
Pics of him walking in them , just like the pope
He was walking in red shoes = He is Hugh Hefners's child?
Critical thinking this ain't.
(PS, As for Red Shoes, my dad actually owned and wore a pair. So, is he Hugh Hefner's child, or a member of the Red Shoe club?)
You cannot reach a sane and realistic conclusion by jumping to conclusions and pushing confirmation bias based on one or two data point. Like someone wearing red shoes.
But put together a collection of data points, and work through them with critical thinking, this can lead you to informed and reasonable conclusions.
One reason there are not more people awake in the world is that too large a percentage of people who consider themselves awake [not normies] simply do not do that.
Too many leave one mentally controlled silo for another. The way to break out is to [critical thinking] + [reason] + [research] + [avoidance of confirmation bias] + [self reflection: thinking processes, emotional processes, action steps], etc.
Don't you think?
I do think that style of shoe and exact shade of red matches all the other photos I've witnessed in the Q drops. Now kindly FO
thank you for the comment.
Red shoes aside, I'm just wondering how you construe being part of the Red Shoes club as meaning he's Hefner's child. (But, seriously, actually, i think you just gave a misplaced answer on a different topic. That was my point.)
Chirpy Fellow!
Hey, I hope you have a great day, and your contributions here continue to be as plentiful and profound as they have been up to this point!
Try you do, fail you will
Doesn't matter, he's a member of the red shoe club too. He thinks playing nice will give him a pass, it won't.
flipped
No, doesn't matter. the red shoes are made with leather from the skins of their victims.
How is this scumbag not on that list? Kid Love Productions??? Either he is not important enough or has already been pushing daisies for a while.
They do eat babies, Bill.
As you know full well. We've all seen your red shoes.
Maher is one of them. Anyone do a search on his name yet?
flipped. More will flip too
Lol. Oh, how the mighty have fallen.
Your apology is acknowledged but not accepted.
NEW RULE: No deals.
Interesting how he talks about a coded language and himself “codifying” when he is trying to prove how these people were stupid not doing it.
Tell me about pizzagate without saying pizza and gate …
He is trying to save public face
Or flipped & slowly breaking it to his audience is the price he agreed to pay
I had not considered that. Thanks for the reminder.
Bill maher’s production company is called kid love
Quick let's backtrack and give a tiny bit of credit to the group that will, eventually, be proven right about all the things.
look at the titles on the cover🤔...
https://www.ebay.com/itm/315307019374
Feb 1997, wow.
yep, and so many clues inside, even in the crossword puzzle.
Still calls them crazy but they’re right. Cute.
Yeah. The guy who literally wears red shoes is "questioning" the possibility. 👌
Pepperidge Farm remembers the red shoes photo.
There's a picture of him in the pizzagate days wearing the red leather shoes. He's pandering. He's guilty af!
His company was called Kid Love Productions. I don't trust him at all.
Finally bill is realizing he is as stupid as he isnt funny.
Apology not accepted Bill. So, what is coming next from your company, Kid Love productions?
He sure seems to be spitting out truth bombs lately. I wonder if this is part of "put in submission"?
Edit: regardless of my opinion of him, lots of people watch him.
Ask Maher about his red shoes... and the Red Shoe club.
and His Production Company called "Kid Love Productions"
https://qalerts.app/?n=4912
https://x.com/scunha11X/status/1662842741955469312
Kid Love productions...
He’s the member of the red shoe club. Arrogant arse. Don’t trust him as far as I could throw him. That ain’t dat.
I keep seeing the pizza/red-shoes “comms” thing come up, and honestly it’s never really added up for me.
It looks like people are actively hunting for pizza or red shoe references tied to liberals, and once they spot one it’s an automatic guilty verdict.
But that same mindset magically disappears when it’s someone they agree with.
The First Lady has worn red heels plenty of times and nobody reads anything into it. Trump’s been publicly seen eating and handing out pizza with police in D.C., and suddenly pizza is just… pizza.
Which makes sense, because pizza is one of the most common foods in the country. Also, let’s be real, I’m pretty sure most people here still eat pizza themselves. Nobody’s swearing it off because of “comms.” If it means nothing when we eat it, why is it an automatic guilty verdict when we see liberals enjoying a slice?
And red shoes aren’t exactly rare either. Louboutin built an entire brand around red soles.
If pizza or red shoes are supposed to mean something, then they have to mean the same thing every time. If they don’t count in one case, they can’t magically become proof in another just because it’s a different person.
At that point it stops being analysis and turns into pattern hunting to support a belief. That’s how things get stretched so far they start hurting credibility.
And just to head this off: Saying “Trump was sending a message” after the fact doesn’t prove intent. If any pizza or red shoes reference can be called a “signal” no matter what, then it’s not evidence, it’s just a story people fit around whatever happens.
Mr. Red Shoes himself? Forced to play dumb now that word is getting around?
So he wants to make a deal…
Pretty sure he already did. The terms are simply stuff he has been saying. He is going to appear to becoming more & more on our side....
That's a non apology for something you literally can't gaslight people into thinking isn't real anymore. It's funny how the anons still get shit on as crazy, when 90% of what we said was truth backed up with the sauce.