The previous three posts have covered some considerations for where we are today. The Federal Government has failed and become corrupt at all levels and Trump intentionally went about establishing the States as superior to the Federal Government during the Covid "scandemic".
But a question was posed in the last post that will lead into this one: What do we do when ALL branches of our government have turned against the very people they serve?
Are we really to believe the Feds are responsible for making sure the Feds play by the rules? Think about that for a moment. The Federal Government has convinced many Americans they are responsible for making sure they behave and don't violate law. But we've seen how that has turned out. In fact, this has become the primary source of frustration for most Americans that has resulted in our two-tier justice system.
Most of us understand that the Founding Fathers gave us the Second Amendment for this purpose. But that was meant to be the very last resort. Sure, it is still an option available to Americans but I believe it will not come to that.
Let's start with these important questions:
- Where does the Federal Government derive it's powers from?
- What permits the Federal Government to hold it's power?
Let's address the first question. Which brings us to an important part of this post - the Constitutional Compact. Today, this is referred to as Compact Theory - because just like conspiracy theory, the powers that be want to divert from the real truth.
Within the first twenty years of our nation, this had already reached the level of the Supreme Court. The Constitution was said to be a compact (i.e., contract) between the Federal Government and the States. However, the Supreme Court ruled and upheld on a few other occasions, that this was a contract between the citizens of the US and the Federal Government because of the phrase "We The People". They opined that because the states were representatives of the people, then it was the people that gave those powers to the Feds. In 1798, this became the first stone in the Feds seizing control.
Thomas Jefferson, one of the men who helped form and ratify the Constitution, infamously opposed this ruling as he was well aware of the intent of the Constitution. One has only look to the Tenth Amendment to see it conflicts with the Supreme Court ruling. In addition, many involved in the process (38 state representative delegates) noted the US Constitution was an improved version of the Articles of Confederation - which to that point treated the states as separate, sovereign nations.
It was not the People who ratified the US Constitution by vote, it was the States. The States wrote and drafted the US Constitution so all citizens would have the same basic rights and freedoms. Note that the Constitution does not say the powers not given to the Feds are given to the People. The tenth Amendment says the powers not given to the Feds are the sole authority of the States.
What would happen if you or I entered into a contract with someone and they didn't uphold their contractual duty. Would you be expected to uphold yours? We know the answer is no. What if they didn't and still decided to take you to court to uphold yours? You would expect the court to find the contract null and void. But what if the court happened to be in the employ of the party that violated the contract?
Isn't that what we have with the Federal Government today. Just since the beginning of 2020, we could all list dozens of Constitutional Violations and far-overstepping their delegated powers. They do this only because the courts are in their corner and they are free to violate their side of the contract while telling others they are held to it. This is how insane it has become.
But that leads us to the second question - What permits the Federal Government to hold it's power?
The very simple answer to this question is the States. Yes, we all feel like the government has all the power and that is why they can do what they want. But do they?
The Government of course will point to the anti-secession pact that Lincoln forced on the States after the war. All states except Texas are bound by this clause. However, to the earlier point, what happens when one party has continually violated their contract? Why are the States being told they are bound when the Feds feel they are not?
What happens when the States wake up and realize they actually hold all the power and the Federal Government has none? What happens when they realize what that truly means?
Why this all is important is you may have noticed after the Supreme Court refused to hear the Texas case regarding the election, the States began to take control again. For too long, they lazily seceded authority to the Federal Government that it did not have. You see, not only did Trump instill Patriotism and hope for our country back into many of it's citizens - he also began teaching the states that they, not the Feds, are the superior government in our nation.
It may be a coincidence, but do you find it unusual that Trump now lives in Florida and the Governor most standing up to the Federal tyranny today is Gov. DeSantis of Florida?
States are now passing laws that directly forbid certain Federal Laws from being upheld in their states. You are hearing about Second Amendment sanctuaries. You are seeing them passing laws forbidding abortion - because this was NEVER a power given to the Federal Government.
In Part V, we'll discuss the end game and why understanding all this was so important for it to happen. Our Founding Fathers were smart men who realized what it could do to a nation should it's government became so corrupt, and against the basic rights provided by our Creator, that it had to be cast off.
And they structured the US for just this moment that will be coming.
I will leave you with one final thought before posting Part V tomorrow. Going back to the excerpt posted in part one from the Declaration of Independence - Do Americans even believe they NEED a Federal Government anymore? What would America look like if the Federal Government didn't even exist and instead there existed a compact between the States? Most Importantly, how would you go about dissolving the ENTIRE Federal Government?
Previous posts in the series for reference:
Part I: https://greatawakening.win/p/12ih0IsGiS/the-end-is-coming--part-i-the-pi/
Part II: https://greatawakening.win/p/12ih0NQ8JN/the-end-is-coming--part-ii-a-sto/
Part III: https://greatawakening.win/p/12ih0Rwc89/the-end-is-coming--part-iii-stor/
For the record, you are awesome! Thank you for these!
Yes they are. Clearly they are in the know.
OP is OK in my books
Q post 2789
Fellow Patriots: What you are about to LEARN (LEARNing) should not only scare you, but intensify your resolve to take back control [Freedom]. The information that will become public will further demonstrate the criminal & corrupt [pure evil] abuse of power that the Hussein administration undertook in joint efforts w/ domestic and foreign dignitaries. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G2qIXXafxCQ
WWG1WGA. Q
My dad would love this post. He has said for my entire life that the Federal Government spends 1 month conducting all it business and the other 11 months trampling the rights of its citizens.
Good stuff. This should be spread more widely.
What is more important to take away is this.
What would the US be like if the Federal Government didn't exist at all anymore?
I know people have wanted the real meat behind this series but you all need to understand what I did when the true end game possibility was posed to me.
So know this - there are always two sides in a war. Sometimes, you first need to make sure your allies are set up and prepared before that war happens.
These first posts of the series were about understanding that the first side is set up. The next post will make all of it come into focus.
What I have been trying to convey in the last posts is this - Trump helped to show which camp everyone was in - either those that supported this country and freedom or those that sold out their own country for their personal greed and ambition. Either way, it was important to expose BOTH sides in the coming conflict.
I have been following Q and conversing with Patriots for a long time. The ending that was revealed to me had not ONCE crossed my mind as a possibility yet it made so much sense I wondered how no one had ever caught on.
What you describe could be thought of as a return to the Articles of Confederation that preceded our current constitution. Each state was pretty close to being its own sovereign country, and the federal government was so weak that it was ... completely ineffective. That is why the states called for the constitutional congress, etc.
I have always hoped that martial law would include getting rid of the US corporation and returning to the original US constitution, but it sounds like you have something else in mind.
I am actually not trying to say either.
Remember when Trump said in his famous campaign speech:
Notice the key word in that sentence of REPLACING. Not fixing, not correcting, but replacing.
And who better to decide what will replace it, after we have seen the abuses that have sown on the country, than the American People ourselves.
The real question is - What will we choose to replace it?
Yeah, hearing this I immediately thought of all the sheep that would push for a Marxist, UBI "utopia"
As Q has said, they actually only represent about 4%-6% of our country. The MSM is what makes them seem like a much bigger group than they are.
Take Oregon, for example. More than half the counties have voted that the want to leave Oregon and join Idaho. In Michigan, for another example, there are 83 counties and Dems only get 6 to 8 of them in elections. But the big one, in Detroit, where all the election corruption is, overtakes the rest of the state.
Let me pose this question to you, How do you think Americans would act if they learned that almost 50% of the votes cast for Biden were fraudulent? How would they act if they realized Trump was actually closer to 90 million real votes? What would happen if the found out for every one vote Biden really did get, Trump got almost three votes.
The scale of the fraud is not massive, it is enormous. And fraud of that scale requires coordination of an unprecedented level. So the question is - who coordinated it? More on that tomorrow.
Assuming your inside baseball vote counts are credible, you're talking about a population base that is a conservative majority by A LOT, and that it only SEEMS like there's more of the lefties because of the msm. Do I have that right?
~90M people voted for DJT, ~40M for Biden... ? That is an incredible, astounding, mind-blowing, earth-shattering piece of information... Based on current US population estimates, this puts lefties at ~12% of the population... Wow.
So, what happens to the msm, since they seem to be the source of all the mischief?
Right. I say let the cities burn if that’s what they want.
If they wanna pass crazy socialist and unconstitutional laws on their citizens, those citizens are dumb for being there.
Move.
It’s already happening.
Now we just need to reinforce that with an emphasis on government by the people on a more local level. Like Wikipedia meets government tycoon. (if that was a game)
To be fair, we probably aren’t either. As much as we think we know, there’s probably still so much more we don’t. There was a time before 2020 where I thought arresting the Spygate characters was the answer to our problems - look how much has happened since then. I think when the time comes to make the decision, the facts presented will make the decision extremely apparent to the large majority of the country.
Bet Trump's got it dealt with already
Nothing to worry about
We shouldn't be paying Federal taxes. Taxation should only occur at the State level where folks are actually represented (once elections are repaired). Keep the money at home and only send a fraction to the feds, that would cut off the drunks in D.C.
This will be glaringly obvious which states are under dictatorship.
Exodus until people demand their rights
This is really a red state full of Conservatives, but things changed with cheating in the elections, We still have an illegally elected Dem Governor here in NC. (along with a Dem Sec of State, AG and State Auditor... they alone CONTROL our elections) I suspect they won through cheating this last election There was no way our Governor won more votes than Trump.
We lost our super majority here in the state after the last election but we still have more GOP in our state Congress.
We have taken back many seats in the State Supreme court and need to take one more back to regain control of our State Supreme Court. We are working on that.
I left NY to move here in NC and when I moved here it WAS a red state with a GOP governor. IT has changed since then.. Still hoping to be able to turn it back.
Same here. I hope we can turn it around.
This was true even a year ago. My husband helped move the oldest son back home (here in WA) from South Carolina. Every state along their week long U-Haul journey was FAR more relaxed than WA. They ate in restaurants and didn't need masks until they arrived back to western WA.
It's truly pathetic. I cannot understand why Washingtonians are so incredibly gullible, compliant and extraordinarily willing to give up freedom.
Not just willing, craving. I have a friend in Seattle who truly believes one world government is the way to Utopia. WA state university is what changed her mind. She said she grew up in a right-leaning household and retained those views until she got her Master's at that school.
You forgot California. We're almost as bad as Oregon.
Large areas of CA are red. Very red.
Keep these coming patriot. Seriously I’m starting to look forward to these almost as much as Wins of the Day. Almost :)
Oh I like that last bit. Mmmmmmhhhhmmmmm. Yes very much! Military of course but a state compact?! Yes please. Raze the ground on which dc inhabits and salt the fucking earth! Outdoor/indoor museums of the real history of our great nation and what it was put through by sick sick evil evil “humans.” High school field trips to learn what happens with, “Fuck around and find out with God!”
Another Awesome Post! As For your question - What would the US be like if the Federal Government didn't exist at all anymore? We would need some form of a Central Government, at least to negotiate, and be represented by, with other countries. To run a Military, and provide Laws over Land, Air, Sea, Rights I am Assuming. I think the system is fine, it is that the People, myself included, have forgotten how to USE IT. Example is the State Legislatures Not knowing that they had control over Voting standards, and NOT Secretaries of State/ Governors. That would have at least taken care of Georgia, and Arizona, at the Very Least. I know in a simpler time and at least for local area, your taxes went to provide Police, Fire, Road, and Infrastructure. Just my Opinions...I could be wrong?
We don't NEED a central government for any of that. What we need is a way for the states to work together and agree how to manage that.
For example, in Europe, while they are still all their own countries they have all agreed to use one form of currency (the EURO). They have agreed to a method of common defense (through NATO).
As for negotiation, do you need a whole Federal Government for that - or simply an elected representative for all the states? The same goes for the military.
What I am saying is the things the Federal Government exists for can easily be replaced and provided by the states working together for their own mutual benefit.
Imagine what the country would be like without 35% of our incomes being stole at gunpoint and threat of jail from a Federal Government.
Then again, if the Fed was ended as we know it today, wouldn't it then be up to the people to decide WHAT we want that will best deal with our needs and protect our rights - as the Declaration of Independence says.
Not sure we want to use the EU as an example as that appears to be a disaster. I think WinstonO1984's comment is a reasonable assumption. And it makes sense to have a centralized group running our international dealings, military, etc. I think originally that was what the federal government was supposed to do. Unfortunately, they've been overreaching for decades/centuries and that's why we're in the state we're in.
Don't miss the point because of the example being used.
EU could be a failure, sure. The idea of sovereign states working together for mutual benefit was the original model for us, as well as the EU.
Politics poisons all, as long as it is left in place. I'm hopeful that constitutional term limits will erase that kind of influence.
Not a good idea to give a terrible example. Like saying we should adopt Socialism, just look at Venezuela.
And plus I think the federal government has a role. Unfortunately they have overstepped tremendously and we have a lot of corrupt actors.
Thanks Wayshuba! I do Like it...ALSO the closer you are to the Power, the easier it is to affect it.
Agreed! The closer one is to it, the easier it is to affect it. Easier dealing with a Local Idiot, than an Idiot a Multitude of states away!
If the endgame is dissolving the entire federal government, I would be overjoyed. Fuck the feds. It is way too easy to corrupt such a detached and centralized power. No more bullshit in California affecting folks living in other states. No more problems of representation. We can hold our own state governments accountable.
I love these posts, but I think you have used the word 'seceded' when you meant 'ceded' - both in this post and in Part III.
(You 'cede' authority, and you 'secede' from the union.)
Another wonderful post! Thank you!
I note that for decades the federal government has controlled the states through cash flow, and I've been somewhat surprised, but thrilled, to discover that some states found the backbone to recognize that the fed needs the states more than the states need the fed, even though that position likely endangers future cash receipts. It causes one to wonder how much of their realization is a result of Trump not issuing federal mandates about the virus mess in favor of having the states make their own decisions.
It certainly clarified which governors are tyrants.
Classic!! Trudeau is soo stupid...he is acting and treating Canada...Like their "Great Global Reset" is still on Schedule!?!?! OR has just decided to have a Great White North Reset all of his own?
There We GO...The People rising up...and Doing it Lawfully :) Kinda hard for things to GO HOT, when one is just following the rules. Kinda Like OUR "OP" sounds like he is been alluding to. Easier for me to Grasp, with Canada's Provinces, then our 50 states. Why I do not know? They are the same concept. Maybe the 50 is clogging my brain up?!?
LOL...Wexit...ya Hoser...hahaha
This is the kind of thinking that brings what is happening now and what will happen into focus. Looking forward to your critically important conclusion.
Nice post
I would like to point out that Civics was taken out of many school curriculums!
This is sooo important. We have so many generations that never understand how our country was created and was intended to be, and what our recourse was should it fail.
Once again, thank you!
Thanks for this. The states lost their rights long ago. I suspect we will see that changing... except for the Democrat run ones.
I would love to see a reboot to our Fed Government. It is far too big and too corrupt.
Do you think we will see this in our lifetime? I sure hope it happens soon.
While this comment will be expanded on in tomorrow's post I will tell you the exact thing that was said to me as the end game was revealed.
"I've known you for 20 years. I know your a man who loves his country, a true Patriot, a good father and a Q follower. But Q followers seem to be stuck on that this is about saving our government. It never has been. It has been about saving our country. How many times does Q have to mention that this is about 'abolishing' our government before people understand?"
More on HOW and WHY that will happen in Post V tomorrow.
One thing we could change right away is getting rid of the commerce clause used to exponentially expand the Feds power. Followed by federal taxes.
Probably several
Answering for a friend
Looking forward to it. Your posts are very enlightening.
Eliminating the Federal government and breaking the structure and function of the Constitution is revolution and a bad idea. Federal Government and State Governments as designed by our Founders are both needed for checks and balances. And it works well for free people within a moral / ethical culture. You suggest that we do away with our Constitution because the people within our Federal Government are corrupt. Shouldn't you suggest to do away with the real problem- a corrupt people? Everyone knows that the people within the current State Governments are just as corrupt as the people within the current Federal Government.
The problem originates with people in an immoral unethical culture, and not with the Constitution.
A few things here:
First, if it didn't become apparent by the government actions last year and this one - the Constitution no longer exists in the eyes of the Feds. They can do whatever they want, whenever they want. The Compact has already been dissolved.
Case in point - Trump was legally elected TWICE by the American People. During his Administration the Government did everything in it's power to hinder him from doing the job he was elected for. On his re-election, the government decided it didn't want him and committed massive fraud for it to happen. So, the Constitution is already dead.
Second, you mention cleaning up the corrupt people. Who EXACTLY is going to do this when the people responsible for doing it (the DOJ) are just as corrupt as the rest of the government.
Third, you mention the "checks and balances" and, in my first post, I included an excerpt from the Declaration of Independence on not only one of our fundamental rights, but our DUTY, when the government has reached the point it has.
Fourth, what is revolution? Was this very country not founded on revolution? Revolution is when a government has become so criminal and abusive the people have had enough. The Constitution you enshrine in your first sentence would not exist without a revolution. That same Constitution will be little more than toilet paper to the Federal Government in a few more years without a similarly forceful reminder that THE PEOPLE, not the government, are master of this sovereign nation.
Lastly, no one is saying do away with the Constitution. But maybe the American People feel is needs to be shored up for the future. Things such as term limits, actual text in the Constitution to ensure secure and free elections, etc.
That is up to the American People. However, the structure and function of the Constitution has long since been trashed by the government. Remember. the Second Amendment was also given to us as a check and balance for when we reached this very point as well. Our Founders even commented that to preserve liberty a little revolution now and again was a good thing.
Agreed OP! Old saying...A war is when the Government tells you who the Enemy is. A revolution is when the people figure it out for themselves! - Hopefully the Topic of DEVOLUTION comes up in your next Post!?!?!?!
Awesome last sentence in the first response. ??
All true.
First, the Constitution though trampled, still exists. Second, the Military is the only way; Military Intelligence, Marines and Militias. Third, it is our moral duty to uphold the Constitution. Fourth, Revolution is a last resort violent act. It took our Founders 30 years to reach that point. We are just now awakening, and we are not there yet. It may take time, but We The People will persevere and win this peacefully, according to the Constitution. Much is happening such as voter integrity laws. All across our nation, people are waking up and pushing back, getting involved in local government and schools and all other areas of political life. This is the way. And finally, Yes, term limits, decreasing the size and scope of the Federal Government, and other improvements will be required as we work toward a more perfect Constitutional union.
I agree about revolution being the last act - as I mentioned in the post.
The military in not the only way, but it will be the way it ultimately happens.
The Constitution will remain.
But, I want to warn you before reading Post V of something I was bluntly told.
"The military is not engaged to arrest people. That is law enforcement. The military is used to DESTROY the enemy."
Please keep that in mind as to come into reading Post V tomorrow.
I know many have been asking for the tribunals. I was outright told those are NOT going to happen. Actually, the words said to me were, "There are no tribunals on the battlefield."
Some of these things people have understood, but I can promise you people do not really know what it will mean when the military gets involved. That is the part that threw me for a loop. If they get involved, it will NOT be to clean up the Federal Government. I can assure you of that much.
Also, there have been so many people with supposed 'military friends with intel' that I can maybe count as many of them as there are dead Biden supporters. You will recall that back in January many people's 'military sources' told them arrests would happen and EBS would be used and nothing happened. So stop stringing us along with one crumb of information every 24 hours and get to the point already. If you're karma farming or you just want to provide hopium that's fine, but don't act like you know how all of this 'ends' when you contradict your own statements. "the military is the only way", "the whole government had to be shown to be belligerent for the military to step in" but now you're suggesting the feds are going to arrest themselves instead of the military? LOL. Please, save us the 'intel'. We've heard that spiel a thousand times. You probably do have a friend in the military who's a colonel, I won't dispute that, but I highly doubt they'd know how all of this ends. The military is on a need-to-know basis, even the rank of colonels likely wouldn't know how this ends. I don't mean to start any drama, I thoroughly enjoyed the first 2-3 posts in this series, but now it's just starting to read like an opinion piece, i.e. "this is what I hope happens!" and it all seems to be contingent on something your military friend supposedly told you. None of my military sources know shit so why would yours?
I believe the most likely outcome is the audits will play out, fraud will be found at enormous levels, Durham's investigation will be complete with indictments brought forward (and DOJ will look the other way), martial law will be declared at some point ala Myanmar and the indicted traitors will be arrested by the military. They will all be exposed as manufacturing a pandemic to steal an election for China, and that will be enough to awaken the world. Military tribunals will be conducted, 187s will be handed out like free Krispy Kreme donuts, and a special election will be held sometime down the line. Voter ID instituted (already has in some states), along with term limits, a financial reset, social media takeover, media blackout and arrests, etc. etc. The pedos are also in trouble once the Maxwell case takes off. All of which would create a perfect storm. Is this wishful thinking as well? Yes, but it's also the most likeliest outcome and it's been hinted at before by Lin Wood, Powell, Flynn, Q, and even Trump. I trust them over your military source that says the cabal (I'm sorry, I meant law 'enforcement') will arrest the traitors instead of the military.
From the beginning (in my first post) I have said this is one way it could play out. I was never told this is definitely the plan but I said it was a plausible explanation. However, what I was told is, if it goes down militarily, it is not going to go the way most in the Q community have thought. We have been so focused on justice being served we have forgotten this is not what the military is used for and, most likely, will not be how they are used should it come to that.
The main point leading to tomorrow and emphasized in your response. The Q community has long discussed tribunals and arrests because, as my post points out, the Feds are NOT going to arrest themselves (I suggested the exact opposite of what you said). That was the whole point at the beginning. What I was pointing out is the military is NOT going to be engaged for arrests.
Be aware, once exposed and targeted, the cabal is not just going to sit back and let them all be rounded up for trials. They are going to fight with their dying breath to keep it from happening. This is NOT going to be a law enforcement exercise, it will be an outright war.
Q did tell us what needed to happen for 11.3 to be triggered and the military to get involved. What I was told fell exactly into line with this.
But here is where people need to start thinking differently. How would the US Military react if a foreign power had invaded our soil? Would they be arresting them? Would they be trying to keep many of them from harm to save them for trial?
Q has said the end is not going to be for everybody for good reason. This is not going to be a simple clean up operation conducted by the US military. We need to be prepared for that.
As for the DOJ, have we not lived through Sessions, Huber, Barr and now Durham? Have you considered that Q has been pointing them out so you pay attention to the abject failure of the law enforcement that is supposed to be arresting and locking up these traitors? Do you really think it takes FIVE solid years of investigations before you have enough to round these people up? We heard Huber, Huber, Huber, in the beginning only to have Huber show up one day and say, "I got nothing." We heard Trust Sessions, only to have Sessions forced out at the end of mid-terms and President Trump go against him when he ran for Senate again. We heard Barr is coming, only for Barr to do nothing, ignore the blatant violations of the 14th Amendment during the pandemic and even go so far as to say they had seen no evidence of voter fraud - despite the overwhelming number of sworn affidavits that were happening nationwide. So I ask you, after witnessing all that, what would lead anyone to believe Durham is suddenly going to come to the rescue?
This is why the earlier posts. Consider that Q pointing out the DOJ constantly may have been for two other purposes than most believe. It may have been to draw our attention to the complete failure and corruption of our law enforcement and judicial branches. Secondly, and more importantly, it may have also been used to keep the traitors scared that justice was coming so they would get desperate and expose themselves and go so far as to commit the biggest crime in history in the last election - which they did in spades.
If the military is being activated to hand out 187's to the cabal and destroy the cabal permanently, I'm all for that, but are they really just going to randomly mow down elderly politicians and other people unprovoked? Some of the deep state would put up a fight, but I don't see someone as old and frail as George Soros to go reaching for a gun. So if they're not going to put up a fight, surely they're not just going to be randomly executed on sight. And you're still not addressing the arrests, because Q has mentioned numerous times that there WILL be arrests, even people in the media will be arrested and many would be tried for treason and crimes against humanity. So that still contradicts your statement that there won't be trials. If people will be arrested and tried, I also 100% doubt they would be done through civilian trials as we can all very clearly see how corrupt the civilian courts are. What I glean from a statement like "the military is the only way" is that the military (and military tribunals) are the only way to bring forth true justice and save our country. What you're suggesting is... um, I'm still not entirely sure what you're suggesting. And why are you saying "if" and "should" the military be used? I thought the military stepping in was a guarantee. As no one else will.
No, they are not going to mow them down.
However, you may want to consider what lengths they will go through to NOT be arrested.
^^^THIS^^^
Not sure that I understand what the implication of that is.... Because if the military won't be arresting everyone and performing tribunals, then who will? The DOJ won't arrest anyone, the FBI won't arrest anyone, law enforcement won't arrest anyone, and the cabal owns and controls them all. The cabal won't be sent to GITMO/prison through the normal court system, and Trump/Q team are keeping GITMO open for a reason. What is the point of Kavanaugh being asked about tribunals then if they aren't ultimately the plan? You also forget that Trump mentioned back in 2015/2016 that if he was President he would try people in a military tribunal as that's faster than the normal court system. I feel like your posts are becoming more wishful thinking than an actual logical prediction of the endgame. You're just contradicting yourself. "The cabal won't arrest itself" and now it's "military won't arrest the cabal, the cabal will arrest itself" ? Trump and Q have also never hinted at abolishing the federal government. They want to replace all of the career politicians in D.C. with patriots and institute term limits and voter ID. Why do you think Trump traveled across the entire country so many times to rally for us to vote for specific senators and congressmen? You're simply not making sense anymore I'm afraid.
Think in this example....
A criminal is caught dead to rights in a crime that will most likely see them get the death penalty (let's say it was for murdering multiple people).
Law enforcement shows up on that person's doorstep to arrest him. He knows if he is arrested he will face the death penalty.
So he decides to fight with everything he has and take a few of them with him until he is finally killed by law enforcement.
Now apply it to this....
You've worked a plan for decades to bring down a country. You've bought off a ton of traitors in that county who are actively working to destroy their own country.
Now law enforcement shows up and you know, based on the crimes committed, you are going to be put to death. To you just sit back and let it happen or do you fight?
I am not contradicting myself at all. In fact, that was the point of this whole series. We, in the Q community, keep thinking this will end in arrests. They will finally get the justice coming to them. But we need to consider that these people are going to fight, and fight hard, when that moment arrives to keep this from happening.
What I am saying, is what we think is going to happen is most likely NOT what is going to happen should the military get involved.
I see. I've just finished reading both of your responses. But the thing is, Q and Trump DID mention arrests, numerous times, they've also mentioned trials and there are many many sealed indictments. So if the military won't be used to arrest anyone, then who will? Again, I do NOT see a scenario where law enforcement makes the arrests. Or are you trying to imply that they will finally wake up and do their jobs, and the military will be there to make sure they will? The police won't even arrest little blue-haired ANTIFA shitheads who physically assault old ladies, so I 100% doubt they would EVER have the guts or the will to arrest Obama or Biden or anyone else. And let's not forget how corrupt the police are and how they all answer to someone in their own chain of command.
And sure, I understand your point, the deep state will certainly not go down without a fight, and the military would surely destroy ANTIFA and anyone else who gets in their way. But do you expect people like Killary and Pelosi, or even Schumer to try and get physical? They would shit their pants if they knew someone was coming to arrest them. So what happens to them? The military isn't just going to walk into Congress and start mowing down politicians unprovoked. Many of the deep state soldiers will put up a fight, but I doubt any of the puppets who are mostly elderly (and these are mainly the people we want to bring to justice) would do anything. I don't expect George Soros to get off his wheelchair and try to fight a US Marine or sheriff. You still take prisoners, you still interrogate, you still 'imprison' them. So I'm still not entirely sure how this is meant to end.
There's no need to be cryptic if you 'know' how this ends. Dumb it down if you have to and explain like I'm five, because there's no scenario where you can convince me that the police would suddenly put down their Krispy Kreme donuts and start arresting the Soros and Rothschilds in the country. I also continue to fail to see how the military is the 'only' way if this is the case.
I am not being cryptic and I definitely don't know how this ends. In the last post, which I just made, I just explain a scenario that was discussed with me which is much more than arrests and trials.
While Trump did mention them, the earlier posts I made were also to take into consideration that some of this might have been said to scare the enemy into taking a course of action they wanted. It is not unheard of in letting people commit certain crimes, where a sting has been set up, to literally catch them red handed.
No, I do not expect everyone to simply be a shooting gallery. Yes, I expect a lot of them will be arrested. But know one knows, even Q, how they are going to react when that moment comes.
I don't care if the blood of traitors is shed, these people are evil and have spilled plenty of blood on their own.
Perhaps tribunals will be reserved for those willing to cut deals?
I pray for our military every single day...this is WAR, get on with it!!!
Then the only conclusion, the end game by the military, will be to seek and destroy the enemy, whether they are domestic or foreign.
I’m all for that. Kill them. Kill them all.
NCSWIC!
I don't care how they achieve it but the MIL needs to root out and kill/deport/destroy ALL commies, foreign terrorists and illegals. They've been spying on everyone for years so they know exactly who the bad actors are. Get on with it already.
PRONTO!!! You tell your source I said so.
THANK GOD SOMEONE IS PAYING ATTENTION!!!
LetErBuck, the problem is that it doesn't work for free people within a moral / ethical culture. We've seen it fail before our very eyes. What's required is a free people with morals & ethics that are actively involved in our government.
Our government has spent well over a century altering this country to make it as difficult as possible for moral, ethical patriots to be involved. Why do so few people ask why a man with a high school degree in the 1950's could work hard and provide for a family and that's nearly impossible now? Both parents working two jobs, longer hours, less personal net worth. I could write a series of posts on this subject along.
And 240 years has given us the time to see the flaws in the Constitution. As Wayshuba alluded to: The lack of term limits, the lack of election regulations along with a list I could make that stretches several pages. The Constitution is one of the greatest documents ever made by mankind, but it is a flawed document. Did you know that when the Constitution was ratified, many Americans viewed it as a betrayal of the principles enumerated in the Declaration of Independence?
Even in the most ethical culture, the un-ethical will gravitate towards positions of power. Any centralized form of government so removed from it's people (Like D.C.) will become a cancer. The only question is "how long", not "if".
The Constitution is a magnificent starting point, but it is flawed and we are seeing the results of those flaws. "Doing away with corrupt people" would likely require bloodshed at this point and would not resolve the problem for good. But incorporating the lessons we've learned into the existing Constitution could allow this great country to last another 240 years.
JackieDatona74, the Constitution is a brilliant masterpiece, and the very reason why people all over the world risk their lives to come to America. Can you see that just this one fact defeats your overall point that the Constitution itself is irreparibly flawed and must be eliminated. Your writing reveals a position of poverty and preference for destroying democratic government and not improving it. Why? Isn't it better to think about construction, making improvements to a brilliant masterpiece, rather than deconstruction and then what? After all, the flaws in people will not go away, even if the Federal government went away. This fact is another reason your proposition would not provide remedy. We should expect freedom and self governance to be messy, never a straight road, and muddy with human imperfection. And while some may see 240 years of 'failure', so many others have seen and still see Hope and Opportunity- this is what our great Constitution conveys to people all over the world. As inheritors of this "magnificent starting point", is our obligation to work hard to uphold our beloved Constitution. And we will. And btw, term limits can be addressed through law and or amendment so it is not a flaw that this was not entered into the Constitution. And did you consider that the Declaration was written for the benefit of the King and people of England while the Constitution was written for the benefit of We The People of America. And so not sure where you got your fact from but- it is illogical that anyone would think the Constitution and Declaration would cause a "betrayal". Apple and an orange.
I now wonder if it was flawed on purpose. The Crown never really set us free and they had plans long ago to get us back. War of 1812. Helping in our Civil War...
All those Freemasons and Secret Societies since the beginning of our country...
Very good question, HP. I've wondered the same.
As well read as I am on the origins of our country, there's still so much I haven't read. I can't give you a good answer to your question, but it's a question I've wondered about as well.
Dissolving the federal government and having a compact between states gave me goosebumps
First post here. Been following for a while. Love this post. But please bring more meat.
90M Trump voters & 40M Biden voters is a pretty good sized steak, imo...
I think the number is probably closer to 90 mil Trump, 30 mil Biden
Loving these posts! So logical and realistic!
I agree with your questions and answers. I also believe that the Constitution and Bill of Rights were specifically set up to establish the states having most authority and the "federal" government to deal with other countries (defense and trade) and matters of national interest only. Even the original senate was set up to contain appointees from the states' elected congress, not people directly elected.
I am cheering on those in states with we-the-people governors and congresses, and believe they will lead the way in the resurrection of our great union. (Sadly, I am stuck in blue-Michigan with one of corrupt governors.) Remembering the fallen today, and grateful for the vision of our founding fathers.
First, the changes in Senators being elected was a huge turning point for the Feds gaining control over the States. The Constitution set up the House of Representatives to represent the people and The Senate to represent the States. This was to prevent the Feds from acting against the direct interests of the States. Changing this to elect Senators basically removed the state representation from the equation and gave it all to the people.
Which brings up another point. Does anyone believe that two-thirds of the States, as required for a Constitutional Amendment, would have voted to give up their power in Congress?
I love these posts. Very good points and encouraging to think for oneself and connect the dots, all while giving a very thought through pointer at how this should unravel.
Can we dump the feds before the October tax filing deadline? Asking for a friend...hrrmph.
Do some research and you'll find out private citizens don't owe any income tax. The IRC is written with very limited definitions of what is taxed and who has to pay it. Of course, the feds have been lying since it's inception to make you believe you owe something you don't.
Well I'll pay to avoid the IRS taking my stuff ...for now. Just trying to figure how to stay alive since mike Adam's warns the govt ultimately Hope's to put a gun to all us anti vaxxers and I know it'll be over my dead body....hopefully I wont have to harm any american blindly trying to follow enforcement. I'm thinking I might have to hide in a red state if it happens.
I look forward to these. Thank you
Wowser!! As Q said, "the end is not for everyone!" What if they did get rid of the Federal Government? I can't imagine it, but what would it look like?
Think more in these terms....
Throughout the pandemic, some states stuck to the original Constitution (South Dakota), many got fooled by Fauci and the CDC and were pissed when they realized they had violated rights because of this traitor (Texas and Florida) and other used it to go full on tyrant and murderers (Michigan, California, New York, etc.)
So, if we only had state governments left and the government is full on tyrant, we can either work to change our state government (much more manageable and in our power), or move out and let the state go full on Venezula.
How would states have to behave if they didn't have Daddy Warbucks in DC bailing them out?
That is the thing isn't it? The states are not held accountable to the people in this current arrangement.
Amazing to think of how the states would behave if the people became their true masters.
Structurally/functionally, how does it change?
Thank you so much for taking the time to write this series up! I am now going back through your other posts and will keep an eye out for your future ones too.
Great writing style..you remind me of a Fren from CBTS.
Thank you again for these posts!
Thanks for sharing!
States getting stronger and the Fed getter weaker...I like it a lot
Here is the big question...which state or providence will be the first to adopt a new currency? When that happens, game over for the deep state.
Very helpful, easy to follow
We have more than we know, indeed...
Good stuff, this ^^^
Bravo u/wayshuba
"The tenth Amendment says the powers not given to the Feds are the sole authority of the States."
OP needs to get the wordiing and intent of the Tenth Amendment correct:
"The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people."
All powers of the federal and state governments derive from the will of the people.
Because I was pointing out the arguments Jefferson made about the Feds having limited power and that the Constitution was a compact with the States. However, you are correct I should have used different language other than solely to explain it.
The States are the people, you are correct, but it was the States that ratified the Constitution and it was the Supreme Court who basically, in their rulings, said the Constitution was a compact with only the People.
The first three posts were great. Why does this fourth post have this obvious and critical misquote of the Constitution?
Possibly to simplify the language, or translate from the legalese language into what is easier to understand without taking a bunch of (limited) space to do so.
Stylistically, u/Wayshuba doesn't seem to be OCD about exact wording, but is more focused on explaining concepts in a way that the dumbest dude in the room can understand.
Might not be "an exact quote" but conceptually, they're exactly right.