Someone on GAW introduced me to the "Ford Play" yesterday. Nixon's VP was originally Spiro Agnew. Agnew resigned in 1973 over an income tax scandal and was replaced by Gerald Ford. Less than a year later, Nixon resigned and Ford became POTUS without ever receiving a vote. This is something to keep in mind.
edit: There is potentially a Constitutional loophole that could even allow for Obama himself to become POTUS for a third term. The 22nd amendment prohibits anyone from being "ELECTED" to POTUS more than twice, but as you can see from the Ford Play above, Ford was never elected to POTUS at all. Something else to keep in mind.
edit 2: since I got stickied (Thanks), I want to add that I'm not making a prediction here at all. Even if research on this idea checks out, I would still say that it's only one of many possible DS plans. Not all plans get used. Not all plans work out. Just something to keep in mind.
That is a loophole the size of a volcano. Fuck!
They could just as easily have written:
"No person shall hold the office of the President more than twice, and no person who has held the office of President, or acted as President, for more than two years of a term in which some other person served as President shall hold the office of President more than once."
Make no mistake, there is and WILL BE fuckery afoot.
/wordnerd
One of the qualifications to serve as vice president is the eligibility to be elected president. It can't happen.
That would mean they still follow rules and are not willing to cover up things...
So if the “president” appointed obama to VP himself tomorrow, and the media said it was so, would anyone in the govt do anything to stop it?
Answer: no
I think this is the more important point anyway. I would think IF they tried to appoint Obama to VP it would certainly wind up getting argued in the SCOTUS. The same SCOTUS that helped Biden win a fake election.
How can anyone on this board STILL not understand that allowing Biden to steal the election WAS the Q plan?
They tossed doing this around in the media before Biden/Biden’s handlers picked Kamala. The idea wasn’t a home run, so I assume they ditched it.
Camela would shit a brick. Her greedy soul just might save us just the way Gollum did in the Lord of the Rings. Sorry to insult poor Gollum. She's of course, way more hideous.
I can't see them try to replace Cabal-a with Barrack... but more likely Big Mike Obama.
but they will fund raise $$$ like crazy as if they will do something.
Appointing a new VP requires a majority vote in both the house and the Senate. The president can't appoint someone and they just automatically become VP.
You might be right but there is at least some debate here. All the language I can find regarding "eligibility" to hold the office of the President is in the 12th Amendment. That's where it says you have to be 35 years old, you have to be a natural born citizen, etc. But it doesn't say anything in the 12th regarding how many terms you can have. Only in the 22nd Amendment does it say you can only be "elected" to POTUS twice. But it doesn't say anything about eligibility there. Obama still meets the eligibility requirements listed in the 12th (at least as much as he ever did) but he is now restricted from being "elected" again by the 25th.
edit: put another way, Obama is still eligible to be President but he is no longer eligible to be elected President.
edit 2: I think I left something out that more directly addresses your point: this from the 12th amendment is what you are referring to regarding restrictions on the VP: "no person constitutionally ineligible to the office of President shall be eligible to that of Vice-President of the United States." Obama is not restricted in the Constitution from the office of President. He is only restricted from being elected to it.
The “president” who was never legitimate in the first place and the woman who verified his fake birth certificate was the only one who died in a controlled plane crash.
Compelling video made the rounds back then showing a diver pulling the woman under water. Looked pretty legit.
I remember that too. I tried to find it again but I think the vid that shows her being pulled under water by 2 men in wetsuits was scrubbed from internet.
I've tried to understand this and it's confusing. To my understanding she was born here, but the fact that both of her parents were here on work visas means that she doesn't qualify?
Yeah can't happen! Like being elected and you are not a citizen! Like being elected with 20 million fake ballots! I could go on and on but the word can't needs to be taken out of the English vocabulary!
Understood. Shouldn't happen then.
We're not talking about being elected. The process described above is one of succession via appointment and approval by Congress.
Yet, this loophole could also allow Trump to hold a second and third term
No loop hole is required for a second term.
Dang it
Oh well
That's life :)
Would be easier to just get Big Mike selected, to get Barry back in the WH. They could also use this for the whole "first woman president" "first dude" thing.
Dave at x22 would be vindicated if they went that way. He was pretty convinced a year ago that they were going to swap "Michelle" in for Biden.
And collagen.
Mike speaks very adamantly about his predictions, which is great. But...
He never goes back and says "I was wrong about Michelle Obama, I now believe we are seeing Devolution Theory play out". He just starts talking about the new prediction and never mentions the previous one again.
Did you just mix up Dave and Michelle Obama? Shame! You're not wrong but Dave is still a national treasure.
Let’s talk about collagen......
I'm sixty and have just this year learned about collagen (not from Dave) from my healthy daughters. It's good for your teeth and makes your skin soft. :D
The talking heads were throwing out Buttiplug's name all day yesterday. Another disaster.
Isn't he still on maternity leave busy breast feeding his adopted kid with his fake tit? SMFH, I can't believe I just typed that. We've effectively reached peak clown world status.
Yup. Salty Cracker was covering the weekend infighting at the pretend White House. Xiden is clearly not going to last past next year, and heels up Harris will destroy even more dem support, so they must have plans for phase 2. Which seems likely to either be Rice or Hussain herself.
Don't forget Hillary.
Despite "Because you'd be in jail", we never "locked her up". Not. Even. Close.
She's free as a bird, chirping gleefully, and ready to "serve" as the first female (whatever that means these days) president.
Maybe. But there was team Killary and Team Hussain fighting for dominance. Eveyone around Xiden now seems to be Hussain people.
But that is a very muddy situation so who knows. Entirety possible.
She implied it in her birthday tweet.
Hillary would be great. She would get nothing done because she has no popularity, and Durham would be dangling over her head.
It’s not really a possibility from what I see.
i dont know. thats what we said in Jan and he's almost made it through a full fucking year!
Ford was a principle on the Warren Committee investigating the JFK assassination.
Committee Members
Earl Warren, Chief Justice of the United States (chairman) (1891–1974)
Richard Russell Jr. (D-Georgia), U.S. Senator, (1897–1971)
John Sherman Cooper (R-Kentucky), U.S. Senator (1901–1991)
Hale Boggs (D-Louisiana), U.S. Rep, House Majority Whip (1914–1972)
Gerald Ford (R-Michigan), U.S. Rep (later 38th President of the United States), House Minority Leader (1913-2006)
Allen Dulles, former Dir Central Intelligence and Dir C I A (1893–1969)
John J. McCloy, former President of the World Bank (1895–1989)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warren_Commission#Members
Ford and Warren were the only two members of the committee to interview Jack Ruby (in his jail / prison cell)
Only other person with significant access to Jack Ruby outside the legal system was Dorthy Kilgallan
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dorothy_Kilgallen
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dorothy_Kilgallen#/media/File:Put_Dorothy_Kilgallen's_scoop_in_perspective.jpg
And her interest in the JFK assassination had predictable results...
https://www.dorothykilgallen.com/2013/10/the-death-of-dorothy-kilgallen.html
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DUOcxyDIYuI
cc: u/MAGAdeburger u/v8power
Nixon was ringside for the JFK shooting ( / in Dallas TX 11/22/1963).
Only learned that recently.
And possibly GHWB
The guy who, to his "dying day", could not remember where he was the day JFK was shot.
Perhaps they flashed but forgot to give a replacement memory?
Possibly???? LOL. Didn't he own the Texas School Book Depository from where Oswald allegedly shot that shot? Some say it was him of course & his reward for that was that he would become president. When Reagan with amazing luck avoided that fate, they knew they had to wait 8 more years for his payoff.
Thinking back, it might have been angels that protected Reagan back then.......
"If the American people know what we did they would chase us down the street & lynch us" -GHWB
https://youtu.be/sqxq03izxrQ
This is an amazing video if you're interested in the JFK assassination.
Freudian slip? Hmmmm
Ford ironically, coincidentally survive 2 assassination attempts.
I remember one of the attempts on Ford was Squeaky Fromme (I think that how her name was spelled ... that happened when I was very young). She was a member of the Manson family.
Who was the other? Weren't they also Manson related?
Manson also wanted to start a big race war ... seems to be in line with what the Dems want today.
Sarah Jane Moore, a former FBI informant
Theory checks out. Text of the Constitution is clear. We're not even really talking theory, given that Ford was indeed the only unelected president in our history. He was appointed VP to replace Agnew and succeeded Nixon after his resignation. If there was a plot to put somebody into the presidency and bypass an election, this is the way. Keep in mind the most important part of this: VP appointment requires a MAJORITY approval vote of both Houses of Congress. Relevant to the current makeup, without a VP, there can't be a tiebreaking vote in the Senate. So say Kamala resigned, in theory it could be a deadlock 50-50 for anyone Biden nominated. Important to note that an approval vote by Congress is NOT an "election" as described by the Constitution. The presidential electoral process is spelled out quite clearly. The term limit implemented by the 22nd Amendment clearly states "elected" and thus a person who "becomes" president through appointment and succession is NOT elected. As ready stated, the wordage could have been much simpler: "no person may hold the office of President for more than 2 full terms or a maximum of 10 years" etc. But that's not what the text says. From a textual interpretation, this reading holds water. Even from an originalist interpretation, this ready holds because the original meaning of the word "elected" meant the same as it does now. Perhaps it was not the intent of the Congress to allow for this loop hole, but the 22nd was passed and ratified BEFORE the presidential order of succession was more firmly established in the 25th Amendment. The assumption of the earlier Congress was likely that the original intent of the Framers was to be preserved as far as what was to happen in a presidential vacancy: the VP would become acting president until a new election would be held. Problem is that the text of the Constitution is ambiguous as to whether that meant until the next "scheduled" election or immediate. In all of my study of the Constitutional convention, and history since it, the more correct understanding would be that a new election should be held IMMEDIATELY. The Constitution doesn't say "all presidential elections must occur on this date." It allows for special elections should vacanies occur. Granted, it eventually would be amended to specific term starts and finishes. But that only happened because of the long-standing inconclusive understanding of the text. When John Tyler assumed office, there was debate about whether he became president or was, according to Article II, to "ACT" as President. His party controlled Congress and thus, his move wasn't seriously challenged. Same thing when Johnson succeeded Lincoln. Same with McKinley etc. Sure there was federal statutory law to deal with line of succession past the VP, but that wasn't until 1947 and it still didn't address the issue over "becomes" president or "acts" as president, pending a new election or when such election should occur.
The 25th did remedy much of the issues with presidential succession, but the loophole of the 22nd is still very much legitimate. Granted, I've never been in favor of any kind of term limits as such they violate a person's equal protection right to serve. The Framers had that debate and the prevailing view was no limits. If Washington or Lincoln (or Trump) wanted to serve for life and the people and Electors wanted them to do so, then why not? Why punish the nation to bar a qualified, desired candidate from holding any office? Term limits were built in... they are called ELECTIONS. Of course, this assumes that elections are fair and reliable, which is our actual problem, not the lack of limits. And as for the appointment process, I don't even object to that as it'd still require a vote of Congress to approve. Frankly, direct election of the president, which we basically now have because of the state winner-take-all general ticket method, and illegal constraints denying Electors their constitutional right to vote as independent agents, is stupid and dangerous. At least with a vote of Congress, it'd be in keeping more with the original intent of the Constitution and the Framers. If more people realized the importance of Congress in these processes, maybe they'd give more shits about voting in their local elections as opposed to only caring about the presidential election... but such is the consequence of the expansion of the office and national party politics.
All very interesting! I thought the most interesting part was the potential for a dead locked Senate in the nomination of a VP. Couple of random questions: Can the 25th be enacted if the Office of VP is vacant? Can an acting VP be appointed if there is a delay in confirming a new VP? Would the Speaker move up to POTUS only if both offices of VP and POTUS were vacant?
edit: we're in a funny spot right now where there are rumors of POTUS, VP and Speaker all ready to leave. Plus #3 in succession (Leahy) is ready to check out too.
Per the 25th, if presidency is vacant, VP becomes POTUS, thus ending the ambiguity over "acts" or "becomes." And this is only in cases of actual vacancy, such as death, removal or resignation. Temporary inability to discharge powers, VP is just acting president.
For a simultaneous POTUS and VP vacancy, we must turn to statutory law. The Speaker, Pro Temp, Sec of State etc down the list shall ACT as (but really, become) president "until the expiration of the then current Presidential term," except in cases of qualification (disputed election) or inability to discharge powers (25th Amendment). In said cases, they'd be acting president until the president/VP-elect qualifies or disability removed.
But interestingly, as to your questions, delays and confusion could cause chaos. Let's use December of 2020 as a hypothetical example...
POTUS (Trump) and VP (Pence) both resign. Speaker (Pelosi) becomes POTUS. But before a VP replacement can be appointed and approved by Congress, the [Trump] cabinet, before they can be replaced, uses the 25th on the former Speaker turned POTUS (Pelosi), on account of disability. House hasn't been able to vote on a new Speaker yet. So now we have POTUS, VP and Speaker all vacant. Next in line to be acting POTUS is President Pro Tempore (trust Grassley). Say this individual is then 25th'd by the Cabinet on account of disability, or resigns, then Sec of State (trust Kanasas) is up, assuming Senate has no time to vote in a new pro tempore. Keep in mind that in this hypothetical, if Pelosi is a case of inability to discharge duties, then Grassley and/or Pompeo is only acting president until disability is removed, which could theoretically be never.
Lots of fun games could be played if there was a highly coordinated effort.
That would be fun. They really should do things like that more often. Thanks!
edit: That would be a creative way to kick someone out of their office, wouldn't it? In your hypothetical Nancy could lose Speaker, become POTUS and then become unemployed in a matter of minutes and never know until after the fact. Could that be done without being disclosed to public?
Exactly. I suppose some of these hypothetical chess moves could be kept secret from the public under the claim of impact on national security.
Court precedent has allowed very broad definitions for what's covered by "national security" matters. I've not review all the masses of statutory law, but there's nothing in the Constitution that requires any of the aforementioned processes to be publicly announced.
The removal of powers due to disability under the 25th amendment can be ended by the president simply submitting a written statement to Congress saying they aren't unable to be president. So it wouldn't ever stick, as Pelosi would just have to simply submit a short written letter to Congress and she'd be back in power. That is built really for comas or if the president had surgery but had a bad recovery or something, where they literally couldn't just write and submit a simple letter to Congress.
Not exactly.
Section 3 discusses the president willingly initiating the temporary "stepping away" (my paraphrase) by submitting a written statement to the Speaker and President Pro Tempore (PPT), not Congress, just to these 2 individuals. Under this process, POTUS resumes powers and duties after he writes back to these 2 individuals. Think of it as voluntary check-in to rehab, but in verse, instead of going in and coming out as you please, it's leaving and returning as you please.
But in a Section 4 situation, if the VP+ (majority of cabinet etc) submit the note to the Speaker&PPT, POTUS can resume powers by writing to the Speaker&PPT to declare absence of inability UNLESS within 4 days VP+ tells Speaker&PPT that no, POTUS is not fit, in which case then Congress gets looped into the process. Congress, if not in session, is supposed to be assembled within 48 hours to vote on the matter. They have 21 days to act on the matter and if 2/3 (ambiguity as to 2/3 in each, 290 House AND 66 Senate, OR 356 of the total... "both" implies the latter, and it would be a joint session, which usually means a total vote of Congress) side with VP+, then POTUS remains "unfit." Note that during this period, VP is acting POTUS. Also to note, this isn't talking about permanent removal from office, which can only be as the result of death, resignation or impeachment. Theoretically, the VP+ and Congress could essentially confine the sitting POTUS to the "bench/IR" so to speak, indefinitely, while the VP (or Speaker, or PPT etc.) acts as POTUS with all powers and duties.
While the original intent of this amendment (1963-65) is innocent on its face, to deal with the recent specific issue of JFK being assassinated, the reality is that the issue had been ambiguous and unresolved for a long time... His Ascendency, John Tyler... Fillmore, Johnson, Arthur, TR, Cal, FDR... the issue of "disability" was more dealing with cases like Wilson and FDR. Yes, the intent was to deal with innocuous circumstances like illnesses etc. but the law still covers vacancy situations in general, regardless of how those circumstances come bout. Given everything that we've learned over the years, it's quite possible that through a coordinated effort, power could be utilized to manipulate situations into making everything fit "according to the law."
Have you watched "House of Cards"? ;)
That ruins everything.
If Congress is not in session, there's a 21 day window. Lot of things can happen over 21 days.
Well, when the text was written, I'm sure (or am I?) that the concern was innocuous and a reasonable attempt to deal with potentially difficult extenuating circumstances... perhaps the powers that be never envisioned losing control to the point that the law and mechanics of the legal processes might be utilized by others against them? Humans are ridiculous and do ridiculous things, often...
Nice post and I think the Nixon to Ford transition from is highly significant and part of what we are seeing occur today. I’m not yet sure how and all the details, but I have seen comms that align as well.
ABBA (the music group) released an album called “Ring Ring” is ‘73 and “Waterloo” in ‘74. You may recall the Waterloo was about Napoleon’s defeat and surrender.
Beyond that, in 1999, the movie “Dick” was released, about Richard Nixon. It featured a different ABBA hit - Dancing Queen.
From prior posts on this site, some of you may know Dancing Queen was said to be No Name’s favorite song, and it was also played at Colin Powell’s funeral recently. Powell was apparently a big ABBA fan.
Finally, ABBA is launching a reunion tour right now and launched their final album - Voyage. Voyage just topped the charts in the UK.
Their old Waterloo song states that “history repeats,” and we see that it surely does. The details are yet to be uncovered, in terms of how.
That would explain such a poor choice of VP (unpopular and incompetent). This would make the swap of VP easier, but would require a triggering event to precipitate it. The VP swap has to happen before the Resident can resign.
I agree. It looks like they're setting a narrative for removal. Last week a story of a rumor that Jill Biden was asking if the VP can be removed by the 25th. This week a story that Kamala isn't getting along with Joe. Hey, now that I think of it, wasn't she mixed up in the Jussie Smollett scandal? There was at least a rumor that she financed it (along with Corey Booker). That would tie up a couple narratives at once.
The incident with Smollett happened around the same time as her announcement to run for President. Then, her and Booker came up with a bill that makes, "lynching," a Federal crime. So lame.
Resign? I think else
There is enough skeletons in Kamala the ho's background that she can easily be kicked out. She was selected despite being unpopular even with a lot of dems.
If she was kompromat it would explain a lot.
Weekend at Obama's? Having to revive the man might prove entertaining.
This has been the plan all along. Its why Harris us VP. She is literally a nobody. Unpopular, from nowhere in the primaries with no support. She called Joe a rapist! He didn't select her, she was chosen as his disposable replacement.
When Joe was to be outed for pants shitting incompetence, Harris' only real job was to appoint Hillary. Then Hartis was supposed to disappear - I don't know if medical, false flag is their style, scandal, Arkancide, or what, but Harris being a nobody is key to Harris being removed. She has no political backing to defend her. She has no help and no allies. She is disposable to them.
Hillary couldn't even win a rigged election she's so intolerable, so she rigged a series of unfortunate events to avoid being elected.
& Ford appointed Rockefeller to be VP. lol. I'm tending to think that not only JFK but maybe Nixon removals were both cabal moves. Taking over the country from both sides. Knowing that Stone has Nixon tattooed to his back & Trump spent a good 3 hours alone with Nixon once tells me he wasn't really a cabal player
the Bushs were cabal men playing right & the Clintons Obama cabal playing left
I was surprised OP didn't mention this. That + the assassination attempts on Ford. The end game was to get a Rockefeller POTUS, clearly.
Wow some good points here fren but why would they take out Roosevelt and not Prescot Bush (father of GHWB) who tried to subvert the nation back then?
So Truman was a patriot?? Julian Assange wants us to know that it was Truman that started all that blame the Russian crap. T
George Jr as a child met LBJ when he was Senate Majority Leader through his grandfather Prescott. No he wasn't executed. They made him a Senator instead. Smedley never made it past the 1940's though for some reason. Here is one take on that coop:
https://www.arcadiapublishing.com/Navigation/Community/Arcadia-and-THP-Blog/September-2018/Smedley-Butler-and-the-1930s-Plot-to-Overthrow-the
There might be better write ups of this around, idk. This is the 1st one I found. Interesting how capitalist / communist & gold standard all have the opposite meaning as what we think today. I think there are crooks who will use any excuse to wreak their fortunes and their are true patriots like Smedley Butler.
When Julian Assange was last arrested he was holding a book in plain sight. Obviously it was a message for those who wanted to dig. The book was about a person who knew the inner circles of Truman
They don’t follow rules and only want mob rule so who knows if it could happen. He’s not a citizen and was President. The scary part is they will definitely use this for their next puppet and I don’t think it will be Camel. She seems so disliked
Your first point is the biggie in my opinion. If (IF) they tried to put Obama in as VP it would certainly go to SCOTUS. The same SCOTUS that helped Biden steal in 2020. So who knows what could happen.
If the Durham investigation fingers Obama, or anyone close to him...they are fucked....did anyone see Tom Fittons Twitter recently, or was that fake?? Do you think for a minute that anyone in that cabinet would take a bullet for Barry? And who haven't we heard about in ages?? Loretta, Brennan, Comey, Clapper....Strzok reared his head recently...and McCabe may just be in the crosshairs as per Kash, and that She/He Fiona Hill was labeled too
This is all the more curious being there are stories floating around on Kamala vs Biden being in an entrenched feud and both attempting to leverage the 25th Amendment concerning ousting the other.
I agree. Last week a story about Jill Biden asking around if the 25th can be used on the VP. This week a story that Kamala and Joe aren't getting along. Whatever the real truth, I see an advancing narrative.
I have a feeling Kamala is going to Dox Ukraine vs Biden stuff. This Ukraine bit is going ratchet and I am always weary when they start drumming up Russia conflict
Is that a gut feeling that Kamala will betray? Or have you seen something to suggest it?
Gut feeling and pure guess
Is this “how you sneak on in”
Thank you for this post. It's an angle that could come into play given Biden's mental state and the universal dislike of Harris.
For some reason this reminds me of Castling in chess.
The Spiro resignation scandal has always stood out to me as odd. Criminals are never punished by the [DS] system unless they went against it. Looking at it from this perspective, its possible that once they decided that Nixon needs to be removed, they got rid of Spiro and replaced him with their friendly guy.
I agree. It could have been a PR campaign for the lncome Tax. People had really only been paying it regular for about 25 years at that time so maybe they were trying to make the IRS look more scary.
Thats a great angle. The Cabal never does anything unless they can kill more than a few birds with every stone they throw.
Very interesting, fren. I confess, I know next to nothing about Agnew and the fact that Ford installed Fuckefeller as his VP made me think anyone else would have been a better choice.
Do you believe anything positive came out of Ford taking over the presidency? Do you believe Patriots were also behind Nixon's resignation (I always assumed it was the Cabal) ? Would love to learn more about this particular aspect of history.
Good stuff, thanks for this.
Makes me teary thinking 1976 could have been the freedom year. I guess the White Hat realised just how badly the system is rigged when Carter won.
And makes me even more sad to see that when Reagan actually won next time, and all it took was an attempted assassination to shut him down completely.
Crucially though, the experience with Nixon and Reagan definitely helped set it up perfectly for Trump. Trump had mentioned many times how Nixon taught him how evil media is and how powerful they are. Reagan taught him the dangers that would be posed to his person and his family.
I am still amazed how he pulled this off. The best I can think is he made multiple deals with multiple Cabal factions, started throwing each one under the bus. Mossad is the last faction, that still believes they are getting everyone vaccinated and handed to them on a platter. Hence they are protecting him. Hence also why he is apparently pushing vaccines.
The way he worked BlackRock and Larry Fink is just genius though.
I read that as Ford theater play.
Same thing I guess.
I didn't think of that. It can't be a coincidence!
I'm sure it will come into play.
Probably camaltoe
Or, as I read in this hilarious Newsweek article (https://www.newsweek.com/donald-trump-reinstated-president-poll-1649669):
"Volokh did suggest one outlandish and highly improbable way in which Trump could return as president.
"In theory, one can imagine Vice President Harris being impeached or resigning, President Biden nominating Trump to replace her, Trump being confirmed by both Houses under section 2 of the 25th Amendment, and then President Biden resigning or being impeached and new Vice President Trump becoming president.
"But for obvious reasons, I doubt that President Biden will go along with that," Volokh said."
Ahaha. They are scared, that's for sure.
Somebody else on another thread just suggested that same thing. It's so crazy it just might work.
this for sure is being processed by AI for its feasibility.
You think I maybe gave them an idea? Just my luck.
Lol. Reminds me of this channel casually dropping Q rhetoric and roasting the libtards in between normie movie reviews, kek
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCQjUbgsbFPnZPB1Lq2ghDvQ/videos
When the Kamala and 25A talk heats to a boil by early next year, expect fireworks
I believe the replacement must be confirmed by the senate
The demonrats are aware and want to do this.
They want to put in buttgag... or maybe big mike.
This is the second time I’ve read/heard this in the last hour. I have no doubt they’re starting a predictive programming campaign to send out the trial balloon. They’re losing the narrative…
Great, you just gave them the plan they were looking for. 😬
Them to do it. At this point only old liberals like Obama. It would be one hell of a red pill.
There were a lot of accusations that the Ford appointment came with a quid pro quo of immunity for Nixon. I mean, it probably did, but I’m not an expert on what happened.
the alternate theory of immunity for Nixon is he had the free energy formula and he was the lawyer for the Navy who knew where all the operation paperclip german nazi's went.
Here comes Hillary (?) Hillary said last week that her political career isn't over. This week we hear Biden is getting rid of Kamala. If Hillary replaces her and Biden dies, she becomes President. Assuming she is alive , is this possible? Will patriots allow that?
BTW, On his death bed E Howard Hunt pointed to LBJ as the key figure in this (& named a number of others too) LBJ & GHWB were friends, GHWB was seen in the JFK white house and LBJ & GHWB joined forces to kill Marylyn Monroe the year previous. GHWB has a weird blank in his resume on that period, I think he was a c1a operative. I mean how does he go from nothing to head of the CIA???
You would think they might have a clue. His daddy Prescott tried a coup back in the 30's or 40's & Smedley Butler stopped him.
good info fren. do you think barry obama is going to placed into the potus role again?
if branson's popularity continues to dive, I could see the powers that be (e.g, the kabbalites) kick bandon out, exponse one of the many scandals that kamala the ho has been in, and try to install o'bummer
you are right we need to be vigiliant
The VP slot is filled by majority confirmation House and Senate. Really think they are going to put Obama back in ?
No, I don't really think they will. I said in my post it wasn't a prediction. Just that it was possible. Someone else pointed out that to fill the VP spot the Senate would not have Kamala as the tie breaker making it even less likely.
Well this is very interesting information. Yes, this is certainly the loophole from hell and is the size of the Grand Canyon. I really don’t think they would try to sneak Obama in this way. After all he is very content to be behind the scenes pulling puppet strings. This does open the way for some very strange shenanigans for sure. I can see them easily replacing cameltoes. They plan things out way in advance and put her there just because she is so incompetent and disliked even by her own party that she would be easy to replace. So they would have to replace her with another woman of color to get away with it. They would replace her with someone so hated that she could never win an election no matter how much money her PR team would spend on propaganda. Then they would easily declare pedojoe unfit and she would be president. I know who this would be but really have no clue how the Vice President slot would get filled or who that would be. You can be sure that they have laid this all out well in advance. This is specifically why they had to place the two most incompetent people in office. I don’t think the switcherroo is very long off. When MSM starts reporting negative on both of them there is a reason for that. It is always just part of the plan. They have been driving this car for a long time and they are not about to give it up. The internet is going to very soon be a place with only one voice. All opposing thoughts will be abolished. It won’t be long now. It is coming very soon. Mark my words.
Stacy Abraham’s
God forbid if the D's did something to get Killary in.