lol its giving late comers a chance to buy some more dwac. I thank them for it even though im not buying anymore. I really cant buy more unless i can afford 1700 shares so my total would be 1776.
Really annoying. I am in UK and when we were part of the EU they made us adopt legislation that I can only buy US stocks if the issuer produces an EU-required document. Of course people in the US do not want the hassle to do that so I cannot buy.
Brexit was supposed to fix all this stuff but the legislation was never rolled back after we left EU. The promises of Brexit were never fulfilled and we were scammed it just made life even more difficult.
i dont know, im not a market exchange person. I'm sure as it grows their will be legal entities created in your country as well? Which may take awhile... I guess just use Truth social when it becomes available to you, support the cause. When commies lose power and we win, I'll sell my shares and take a trip around the world, buying everyone drinks so i can share the gains :D
Meanwhile WSJ front page includes a leader to an article pointing out the NBC's Beijing Olympic Kowtow games had the lowest ratings EVER!...elsewhere Crowder points out that Big-Tech social platform stocks continue o take a nosedive and drag the stock indexes down with them...
It’s true, but without having read the article, I’d bet it both maligns the real app and makes fun of the “Trump fans” who fall for the fake app.
Edit:
Found the article and skimmed it, and boy do I ever know these people!
An apparent rip-off of Donald Trump’s social media network Truth Social has racked up downloads in the six figures on Google’s Play Store, causing confusion by MAGA types who failed to realize the distinction.
The article then proceeds to make fun of reviewers praising or complaining about the fake app as though it were real.
Notice the phrasing. If this were any other subject in which users were duped into downloading a fake app, the writer wouldn’t have used negative words connoting blame and ascribing it to the user. Any blame would have centered entirely around the app publisher.
The writer also would not have used a knowingly divisive (and from the left’s perspective, derisive) label like “MAGA types” in close proximity to the connotations of blame.
Here we have: “MAGA types” (divisive label) who failed (blame) to realize the distinction.
TRUTH is an inclusive (in the actual sense, not the libtard sense) free speech platform spearheaded by Trump, that’s seeking to eventually overthrow its competitors.
The very notion that it is only for “MAGA types” is slander to them.
If this were, say, a marketplace app for disenfranchised minorities, I promise you this statement would be written more like:
“An apparently fraudulent version of {x} app, racking up {y} downloads in its attempt to intentionally confuse minorities looking to support their community”
That revised tone shifts the onus from the user to the app publisher, uses neutral or protective terminology to label the users, and conveys a tone of the writer trying to right an injustice rather than laughing at the situation from afar.
If you’re saying this is not one of those Buzzfeed “ha ha look at the uneducated anti vaccers” articles, then sure, but that’s not how most media portrayals work. Some are subtler than this, some are more brazen, but I promise you that you are unlikely to find even the subtle language ever skew in favor of the Trumpers.
Mkay I'm not going to use "What they would have done if xyz" as evidence of anything, since we're talking about what actually happened. I don't see anything that blames the user or says anything negative. They were duped by a phishing app. It happens all the time to everyone.
It's not blaming anyone. I think you're being a bit sensitive.
If you're that insulted by something so minor I think you need to toughen up a bit.
Lol, “evidence”. You asked how they should have phrased it and you gave a ridiculous example, and I was just answering your question with something more realistic that matches the tone of hundreds of leftist articles that we could all relate to.
Honestly I was just jokingly pointing out that the article was exactly as I expected it to be.
After years of being slandered by the media in all forms, working alongside people every day who form their hostile opinion of me from all of these negative cues (subtle and otherwise) in the media that they see all day, every day - I can assure you, this article is the least of the things insulting me right now. I just find it funny how consistently these things are written and how well I can predict them.
If you don’t see how this same tone would come across mockingly if written about something you identified with, then I’m glad. You’ve probably never met the consequences of people who hate you based on constant barrages of this kind of stuff, but I’m happy for you.
If this is your idea of fighting misinformation - telling people how they should feel after reading something - and this makes you feel like you’re fighting the good fight, then you do you.
But honestly it sounds like you’re just mad that we know the game. 😆
Well, they DID try and get him killed for being gay when he went to the Middle East, so yeah, I can see why he'd be willing to help out someone that's bending over the lot of them.
Struggled to get his message out on social media? What utter bullshit. I daily see his message on Save America which is rebraodcast on twitter by Liz Harrington and trumpeted from sites like GWP.
President Trump has had no problems getting his message out to those who dont refuse to see through their cabal programming.
I saw a post claiming that a user was banned for saying White Lives Matter. Seems probably fake/trolling but I'm interested to see how robust the free speech is on Truth Social once more people are allowed in.
If they want to apply "sensitive content" tags equally to both sides of something that is literally a sensitive issue I'm down with that.
Whole point is that I want an unbiased platform that applies its rules equally and fairly.
Reddit/Twitter/Facebook are obviously way too far left and here we're obviously too far right with our biases. For here, it's fine because it's literally marketed as such and we needed this space.
But for something like Truth Social, a true intentional competitor to leftist social media, clear rules with clearly and fairly enforced rules to both sides is exactly what the space needs. Especially if it's not banning legal content.
I agree and think that’s their intention. Under trumps tag, there’s all kinds of people calling him names and trolling. I also have a theory that Truth may wind up being the EBS, which is why they are taking their time on the launch. I believe it’s been in the works since the beginning. He coined “fake news” from the beginning which eventually led to truth social being launched. The fact that he now has an open platform to truth (tweet) and hasn’t posted anything lends to my theory. I also haven’t been able to find don jr but that could be a me error?
Havent we learned that fake news is just that? Why would you fall for a narrative by those who are desperately trying to diminish a threat to their tyranny?
Wow, the liars are out in force!! I've been a beta user on Truth now for about a week and more people are added every day. Also, I'm locked out of Telegram so you all are my go-to NEWS page. Keep up the good work!
Devin Nunes reports they are deleting bots that are basically pre-programmed algorithms at the sign-up stage. They have recognized the issue as Deep State tactics here and are addressing it.
The death penalty is certainly warranted for those people who have engineered these clot shots. Even Trump will need to stand trial during the Nuremberg 2.0 hearings for his role. I want to hear his reasoning for pushing these things, and if he is found guilty, he has to face punishment just like everyone else. Censoring Stew Peters for stating this simple fact shows very poor judgement by the Truth Social admins. It is time to stop censoring things that certain snowflakes may find offensive. Put it out there. We are adults. We can decide for ourselves what is real and who we want to block. I don't need an anonymous censor at Truth Social to make my decisions for me. That is what the left does. We are supposed to be better than them. Darkness can never drive out darkness.
It wasn't censored though. It was only flagged as "sensitive". Not a fan of that either, but I'm guessing it was a compromise to get onto the walled gardens of Apple and Google. One thing at a time. This is not that big of deal. We have Gab for wide open anything goes discussions.
Truth will be more about being mainstream and widely adopted. Its important so that sensitive information can be disseminated quickly world wide. "You are the news now." Almost no one would know what is going on in Canada if not for social media. You can be sure western nations and big tech are working to "fix" that.
We NEED Truth Social to move onto the next stages of the Great Awakening.
Didn't remove it, but put a "sensitive content" warning you have to click over. He did call for public executions right out the gate. But I think warnings and the like are lame and am not impressed.
what i had seen was that his post was about trying and executing people who really do deserve it. However, I do accept that there terms of service do not allow threats and calling for executions certainly falls under that.
Execution implies that there has been a some kind of wrong doing and being proved so in a court of law thus could be used justified. Murder would be a threat.
eh, stew's a bit of a grifter, and this battle is much bigger then this. I'm going to give it a pass for awhile and reassess. Ya'll rushing out to give the commies victory by self sabotage, its retarded. These idiots are arresting people and freezing their bank accounts and yall mad there was a "sesnsitive content" warning on a guy calling for execution at a time when they are literally investigating trump for "starting an insurrection." Its mind numbing.
They're so upset that Truth Social doesn't let you spread lies and slanderous material. They explain one of the plus of twitter is that you can spread slander, libel and lies. Those weren't the exact words in the article I read, but it was pretty much "Truth Social has more censorship than twitter. The site will not allow for slander, libel and posts that..."
So... apparently if you can back up your claims then you're fine, but if you are spreading lies to destroy someone's character then you will be banned. And the fake news is like "ISN'T THAT SO TERRIBLE?! IT'S CENSORSHIP WHEN YOU WON'T LET US SPREAD LIES!"
Evil and deception can't live in the light. Their anguished caterwauling at their imminent demise just brings a smile to my face. Truth spreading is the tide fully turning against them.
The people swayed by stories like these are the people that wouldn't have signed up anyhow. The people who have been waiting or want to sign up, will anyhow. This is just pandering to their asleep comrades, reassuring them they don't need to join.
Translation= What are we going to do Trump is going to have the best platform out there and we wont be able to control and manipulate anymore. kek
Its going to be glorious the libshits are going to be crying into their soy lattes every day knowing that they are nothing but a few loud voices now being drowned out by the majority who don't want to put up with their shit anymore.
Also how funny would it be if Trump ended up being even richer and was worth over a $100billion in the end.
How do you get the MSM to report to the masses that social media is blocking information about vaxxines? Brilliant!!!!!! First they start researching what is Trump hiding, then they find out what the MSM has been hiding for 2 years, then the lies, then the news about aids, then the denial, then the anger, then the PAIN.
After reading through this thread my question is how some people here at GAW can possibly fall for this fake news bullshit in the middle of an information war that we are all well aware is occurring?
Strange, it almost like nobody reads the MSM's bullshit anymore because why would millions of people be trying to get on it and when they see the wait list they just say "OK, I'm still down but I'll wait my turn to get in" and not saying FUCK THIS!! I'm going back to Twitter...They're terrified of this and should be.
lol its giving late comers a chance to buy some more dwac. I thank them for it even though im not buying anymore. I really cant buy more unless i can afford 1700 shares so my total would be 1776.
Nice!
I really want to invest but I am not based in US so it is not allowed. Any way around it that you know of?
Really annoying. I am in UK and when we were part of the EU they made us adopt legislation that I can only buy US stocks if the issuer produces an EU-required document. Of course people in the US do not want the hassle to do that so I cannot buy.
Brexit was supposed to fix all this stuff but the legislation was never rolled back after we left EU. The promises of Brexit were never fulfilled and we were scammed it just made life even more difficult.
I did not know that about the stock. This right here is some communist bs.
I am in the UK and have bought some via freetrade which is an app based broker. You have to sign a form to buy US stocks.
Great info!!! 😎
That's interesting, the document I spoke of is called a KIID (Key Investor Information Document) - no KIID, no can buy.
Maybe because freetrade is American and they don't know they are supposed to be restricting it ? Anyway thanks for the heads-up
You need to pay for a premium account to buy american stocks.
This is important: They won't let you DRS (direct register your shares, important for GME)
My account is a stocks and shares ISA if that helps.
i dont know, im not a market exchange person. I'm sure as it grows their will be legal entities created in your country as well? Which may take awhile... I guess just use Truth social when it becomes available to you, support the cause. When commies lose power and we win, I'll sell my shares and take a trip around the world, buying everyone drinks so i can share the gains :D
1776 shares? This is the way.
No clearance with my broker. C'mon MSM get me a good buy in price before you die!
lol
Meanwhile WSJ front page includes a leader to an article pointing out the NBC's Beijing Olympic Kowtow games had the lowest ratings EVER!...elsewhere Crowder points out that Big-Tech social platform stocks continue o take a nosedive and drag the stock indexes down with them...
Same-exact-here 👍🏽💕
no loss. all I know is that CCP athletes cheated, but no one could say anything about it... I guess Tanya Harding should have skated for China...
Yes. When the enemy expends their ammo you are over the target. Winning. u/MAGULQ
all press is good press
Um, isn't the jizmodo one true?
Better Than Amazon
Oohh!! Thanks!
It’s true, but without having read the article, I’d bet it both maligns the real app and makes fun of the “Trump fans” who fall for the fake app.
Edit: Found the article and skimmed it, and boy do I ever know these people!
The article then proceeds to make fun of reviewers praising or complaining about the fake app as though it were real.
They also mention QAnon, whatever that is. 🤷♂️
https://gizmodo.com/fake-android-app-truth-social-in-app-purchases-trump-1848578038
I don’t see them making fun of anyone in here. Reporting that people are using a fake app isn’t making fun of them
"causing confusion by MAGA types who failed to realize the distinction."
This is mediaspeak for Trumpers are retarded.
???
They failed to realize the distinction between a legitimate app and an illegitimate one. That's what happened. How else should they have phrased it?
"causing confusion by MAGA types who have a lot of other really great qualities they just made a mistake this one time"?
Notice the phrasing. If this were any other subject in which users were duped into downloading a fake app, the writer wouldn’t have used negative words connoting blame and ascribing it to the user. Any blame would have centered entirely around the app publisher.
The writer also would not have used a knowingly divisive (and from the left’s perspective, derisive) label like “MAGA types” in close proximity to the connotations of blame.
Here we have: “MAGA types” (divisive label) who failed (blame) to realize the distinction.
TRUTH is an inclusive (in the actual sense, not the libtard sense) free speech platform spearheaded by Trump, that’s seeking to eventually overthrow its competitors.
The very notion that it is only for “MAGA types” is slander to them.
If this were, say, a marketplace app for disenfranchised minorities, I promise you this statement would be written more like:
“An apparently fraudulent version of {x} app, racking up {y} downloads in its attempt to intentionally confuse minorities looking to support their community”
That revised tone shifts the onus from the user to the app publisher, uses neutral or protective terminology to label the users, and conveys a tone of the writer trying to right an injustice rather than laughing at the situation from afar.
If you’re saying this is not one of those Buzzfeed “ha ha look at the uneducated anti vaccers” articles, then sure, but that’s not how most media portrayals work. Some are subtler than this, some are more brazen, but I promise you that you are unlikely to find even the subtle language ever skew in favor of the Trumpers.
Mkay I'm not going to use "What they would have done if xyz" as evidence of anything, since we're talking about what actually happened. I don't see anything that blames the user or says anything negative. They were duped by a phishing app. It happens all the time to everyone.
It's not blaming anyone. I think you're being a bit sensitive.
If you're that insulted by something so minor I think you need to toughen up a bit.
Lol, “evidence”. You asked how they should have phrased it and you gave a ridiculous example, and I was just answering your question with something more realistic that matches the tone of hundreds of leftist articles that we could all relate to.
Honestly I was just jokingly pointing out that the article was exactly as I expected it to be.
After years of being slandered by the media in all forms, working alongside people every day who form their hostile opinion of me from all of these negative cues (subtle and otherwise) in the media that they see all day, every day - I can assure you, this article is the least of the things insulting me right now. I just find it funny how consistently these things are written and how well I can predict them.
If you don’t see how this same tone would come across mockingly if written about something you identified with, then I’m glad. You’ve probably never met the consequences of people who hate you based on constant barrages of this kind of stuff, but I’m happy for you.
If this is your idea of fighting misinformation - telling people how they should feel after reading something - and this makes you feel like you’re fighting the good fight, then you do you.
But honestly it sounds like you’re just mad that we know the game. 😆
Yes, but Gawker's a shithole that almost got sued out of existence by Hulk Hogan.
Funded by Peter Thiel.
Well, they DID try and get him killed for being gay when he went to the Middle East, so yeah, I can see why he'd be willing to help out someone that's bending over the lot of them.
I read about that app and it may be phishing app. Also I saw a couple buttons that looked exactly from tiktok
Vetted by Google.
Hahaha
😂☝🏼
I'm just surprised that they called the app shady instead of specifically laughing at "Trump supporters" in the headline.
Getting flak? Must be over target!
My favorite quote of the day is from this ignoramus:
https://www.investors.com/research/donald-trump-stock-buy-now-trump-media-technology-group-tmtg-stock-dwac-stock-spac/?src=A00220&yptr=yahoo
No duh. He hasn't been on ANY social media because you fools censored and banned him for speaking truth. 🤣
funny his audience has had no problems reaching out to him at his rallies. that speaks volumes over /reply
Yep! Their vile hatred for him is crazy.
Struggled to get his message out on social media? What utter bullshit. I daily see his message on Save America which is rebraodcast on twitter by Liz Harrington and trumpeted from sites like GWP.
President Trump has had no problems getting his message out to those who dont refuse to see through their cabal programming.
And targeted hundreds of thousands of patriots as "domestic terrorists". Hi Klaus and minions, and kys Nance, you damned demonic whore!
How would anyone working for any of these outlets actually know when the wait list is a couple of hundred thousand?
Likely because they sign themselves up
Wait, the news is telling me to avoid the Truth? Imagine that. Their careers are ended. SOON.
u/#careerended
Kek
u/#Clownworld
I saw a post claiming that a user was banned for saying White Lives Matter. Seems probably fake/trolling but I'm interested to see how robust the free speech is on Truth Social once more people are allowed in.
If Truth Social is gonna censor that and vax truth then fuck it I’ll delete my account.
I don’t think they are. They had a sensitive content warning but if you clicked on it, you could see it.
If they want to apply "sensitive content" tags equally to both sides of something that is literally a sensitive issue I'm down with that.
Whole point is that I want an unbiased platform that applies its rules equally and fairly.
Reddit/Twitter/Facebook are obviously way too far left and here we're obviously too far right with our biases. For here, it's fine because it's literally marketed as such and we needed this space.
But for something like Truth Social, a true intentional competitor to leftist social media, clear rules with clearly and fairly enforced rules to both sides is exactly what the space needs. Especially if it's not banning legal content.
I agree and think that’s their intention. Under trumps tag, there’s all kinds of people calling him names and trolling. I also have a theory that Truth may wind up being the EBS, which is why they are taking their time on the launch. I believe it’s been in the works since the beginning. He coined “fake news” from the beginning which eventually led to truth social being launched. The fact that he now has an open platform to truth (tweet) and hasn’t posted anything lends to my theory. I also haven’t been able to find don jr but that could be a me error?
Havent we learned that fake news is just that? Why would you fall for a narrative by those who are desperately trying to diminish a threat to their tyranny?
You aren't at the tippy top unless you got haters ;)
Wow, the liars are out in force!! I've been a beta user on Truth now for about a week and more people are added every day. Also, I'm locked out of Telegram so you all are my go-to NEWS page. Keep up the good work!
Stu Peters is in on this too. Saying he was censored for an anti-vax post. Trying to smear the platform as just as bad as Twitter
It appears he's more interested in clicks than the truth...
Someone above said he wants to start his own platform?! That explains EVERYTHING. F*ck him…if he does it will FAIL.
What do they care? Why should they be afraid of a new social media app?
They protest too much.
"He lives rent freeeeeee.... ....in their heeeeeeads... ...zaaaawwwwawmbie....zawwwwawwmbie..."
exactly^ and this is why I haven't even bothered with checking my 'place in line'.
just watching DJT mess with them for awhile before the real truth social is up & running.
I don't understand all the impatience, it will be ready when it's supposed to be🇺🇸
Devin Nunes reports they are deleting bots that are basically pre-programmed algorithms at the sign-up stage. They have recognized the issue as Deep State tactics here and are addressing it.
I'm still in queue
Name checks-out 😎
tbf truth social did remove stew peters’ post about the vaccine
Another thread was saying it was not deleted, only had a warning put on it because he called for the execution of those responsible.
it wasn't deleted, you just had to click a button to view it.
phew thank god
The death penalty is certainly warranted for those people who have engineered these clot shots. Even Trump will need to stand trial during the Nuremberg 2.0 hearings for his role. I want to hear his reasoning for pushing these things, and if he is found guilty, he has to face punishment just like everyone else. Censoring Stew Peters for stating this simple fact shows very poor judgement by the Truth Social admins. It is time to stop censoring things that certain snowflakes may find offensive. Put it out there. We are adults. We can decide for ourselves what is real and who we want to block. I don't need an anonymous censor at Truth Social to make my decisions for me. That is what the left does. We are supposed to be better than them. Darkness can never drive out darkness.
It wasn't censored though. It was only flagged as "sensitive". Not a fan of that either, but I'm guessing it was a compromise to get onto the walled gardens of Apple and Google. One thing at a time. This is not that big of deal. We have Gab for wide open anything goes discussions.
Truth will be more about being mainstream and widely adopted. Its important so that sensitive information can be disseminated quickly world wide. "You are the news now." Almost no one would know what is going on in Canada if not for social media. You can be sure western nations and big tech are working to "fix" that.
We NEED Truth Social to move onto the next stages of the Great Awakening.
Didn't remove it, but put a "sensitive content" warning you have to click over. He did call for public executions right out the gate. But I think warnings and the like are lame and am not impressed.
What was the post?
can't recall exactly but it was basically saying the vaccine kills people
I read that he was calling for the execution of those behind the vaccine and was censored. I don’t think ANY censoring is cool if true.
He wasn’t censored. There was a sensitive content that you clicked and could see. I think he was also part of the Beta Testing
if there's zero censoring it'll turn in to 4chan
I’ll just stick with GAW and Gab if that’s the way it’s going to be
Then die. Fake pede.
Stews going to have his own uncensored platform soon...he said that yesterday😁🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
what i had seen was that his post was about trying and executing people who really do deserve it. However, I do accept that there terms of service do not allow threats and calling for executions certainly falls under that.
Execution implies that there has been a some kind of wrong doing and being proved so in a court of law thus could be used justified. Murder would be a threat.
eh, im still going to give this a pass, this is a bigger cause then stew peters grift. I'll wait some time and reassess.
Those arent threats but Justice being served.
eh, stew's a bit of a grifter, and this battle is much bigger then this. I'm going to give it a pass for awhile and reassess. Ya'll rushing out to give the commies victory by self sabotage, its retarded. These idiots are arresting people and freezing their bank accounts and yall mad there was a "sesnsitive content" warning on a guy calling for execution at a time when they are literally investigating trump for "starting an insurrection." Its mind numbing.
They are petrified!
Results
https://files.catbox.moe/ni5fbn.PNG
They are panicking HUGELY
Wow, over the target much?
Trump to the MSM, and all their leftist "news" subsidiaries, and their leftist drones, is like water to the Wicked Witch of the West.
The sooner they all melt, the better.
Nice analogy. That would make a good meme, come to think of it.
They're so upset that Truth Social doesn't let you spread lies and slanderous material. They explain one of the plus of twitter is that you can spread slander, libel and lies. Those weren't the exact words in the article I read, but it was pretty much "Truth Social has more censorship than twitter. The site will not allow for slander, libel and posts that..."
So... apparently if you can back up your claims then you're fine, but if you are spreading lies to destroy someone's character then you will be banned. And the fake news is like "ISN'T THAT SO TERRIBLE?! IT'S CENSORSHIP WHEN YOU WON'T LET US SPREAD LIES!"
Evil and deception can't live in the light. Their anguished caterwauling at their imminent demise just brings a smile to my face. Truth spreading is the tide fully turning against them.
What's the article? What's the end of that sentence:
Someone has their knickers in a knot. Frothing won't help, msm end is nigh.
The people swayed by stories like these are the people that wouldn't have signed up anyhow. The people who have been waiting or want to sign up, will anyhow. This is just pandering to their asleep comrades, reassuring them they don't need to join.
Thank God the tryhards are obvious.
Translation= What are we going to do Trump is going to have the best platform out there and we wont be able to control and manipulate anymore. kek
Its going to be glorious the libshits are going to be crying into their soy lattes every day knowing that they are nothing but a few loud voices now being drowned out by the majority who don't want to put up with their shit anymore.
Also how funny would it be if Trump ended up being even richer and was worth over a $100billion in the end.
How do you get the MSM to report to the masses that social media is blocking information about vaxxines? Brilliant!!!!!! First they start researching what is Trump hiding, then they find out what the MSM has been hiding for 2 years, then the lies, then the news about aids, then the denial, then the anger, then the PAIN.
In other news it’s a day ending in [Y].
Good!
LMFAO. CANT WAIT TO GET IT. THIS WILL BE MY FirST SOCIAL MEDIA
Keep this name 👍🏽 That’s how we’ll spot each other of course. Capt Obvious here.
After reading through this thread my question is how some people here at GAW can possibly fall for this fake news bullshit in the middle of an information war that we are all well aware is occurring?
I don’t think anyone’s falling for their crap, just highlighting their narrative and venting. And making fun of their patheticness. 👍🏽
I'll just quote what I responded with 9 weeks ago on a thread here about the truth social launch
"I actually think they will be unable to do it that way.
They will use their propaganda arm to claim how it has the lowest initial engagement of any social media app ever launched.
Then they will say how unsafe the website is and that you should avoid it at all costs.
Here's the headline from the daily beast:
"No, it's not political. Truth social is just plain unsafe""
Unsafe for their brittle minds. Ha haahh they need more crayons in their cry-closets.
Bless their little hearts.
I like how [they] call a proper vetting process a "disastrous role out."
[they] scared BIIIIGLY
My favorite "app censored antivacine content" rofl. Sure it did
Lol for real, half the stuff I post is anti mRNA vax shit
Strange, it almost like nobody reads the MSM's bullshit anymore because why would millions of people be trying to get on it and when they see the wait list they just say "OK, I'm still down but I'll wait my turn to get in" and not saying FUCK THIS!! I'm going back to Twitter...They're terrified of this and should be.
Our local news last night, with ominous tones and scary headlines... Basically just reported a story that said Truth was really popular.