Higher Quality Posts Wanted
Garbage IN, Garbage OUT!
- I have seen several posts which end up being false stories or disinformation, many of which end up being shared with others (such as family members) only to have to walk back their posts once they realize the posts were based on fake stories. This makes it harder to wake normies up.
- To help reduce the proliferation of disinformation, if you are creating a post please verify that what you are posting is accurate in its entirety.
- For example, if you want to post an image of a Twitter message instead of the Twitter link, verify that the post actually exists. It may be worth adding the link into a comment or an archived link in case people would like to also verify.
- Here is an actual example: https://greatawakening.win/p/15JUCeprCJ/got-your-coffee-walk-up-to-the-l/ While the image is real, the example thumbnails are not real. Either mark it a shitpost or perhaps we could post this with a new flair of "Disinformation Alert" or something.
- Let's work to make this community better, by being more accurate with what is and what is not for entertainment, and what is actually accurate enough to share with normies.
And no more of this flat earth crap. That has no place here and I suspect it's done to discredit the movement.
There are several movements on here that I suspect is meant to do this.
Call them what they are: bowel movements.
Indeed
Several?
You mean MOST.
Less than 25% of posts on here can be 100% vetted to be true.
And that's the stuff that isn't even CT.
Just flat out WRONG.
I complained to Mods, I get banned all the time now.
They said, "hit report if it's Disinfo".
I just reported this one:
https://greatawakening.win/p/15JUCh8ZRn/breaking-newsgermany-halts-all-c/c/
Let's see how long it stays up.
Its already deleted I think.
Can we also add lizard people into that mix, or are we not yet ready to relegate that in with flat earth shinannigans?
I think that is fair, but the question is, wouldn't that fit better in conspiracies.win?
Be that as it may, conspiraicies.win is not tied to any specific movment. Ours is, and if the coprorate media can tie Trump supporters to Flat Earthers or dinosaur deniers or whatever, they will have their people on here to spread that crap to damage the reputation of the Q movement and GEOTUS. I recently had a run-in with a flat earther on here, wanting to bicker with me via DMs and unleashing textwalls on me, as well as how Q got so many things wrong.
Q specifically said that the earth is not flat and that the moon landings were real. Whether or not the video recorded of the landings were real is another story. But the very idea of a flat earth when anyone with a decent telescope can see that the other planets in the solar system are obviously round is not only insanely stupid, but the idea that the earth is somehow flat is so completely boring. I'm far more interested in this "hollow earth" theory, but that doesn't belong here either.
Lizard people is pretty much tongue-in-cheek by 100% of those who use it.
I can't imagine anyone actually believes it.
Just like there were no giants living among the people due to contaminated DNA when angels had children with human women resulting in Nephilim? Just because we can't always prove things to someone else's satisfaction doesn't mean they aren't true but maybe only lacking some of the pieces of the puzzle.
Well, it depends if you mean literal shape-shifting lizard aliens, I could accept because they are evil enough, self-recognize, and act like they are above the law, but the figurative short hand for "high functioning psychopaths" is plenty good and something I wouldn't be embarrassed trying to back up.
It could be a coping mechanism. If Hillary is only guilty of HALF of what she's accused of doing, it feels more comfortable for me to think of her as somehow not a human being. That adrenochrome-addled, cannibal witch is a human? Impossible. Oh, she's actually a subterranean reptilian from Dimension 13B wearing a holographic human skinsuit? Yeah, I can see that.
I would 100% add them into that bunch
What?? You don’t believe in flat earth????
When I was in Navy back in the 80s I recall a couple of times when headed to a certain country like Madagascar where we reached the edge of the earth instead of reaching that country, we had to turnaround and head the opposite direction in order to reach that country from the other side. Naturally, this messed up our schedule by many, many weeks seeing that we traveled at 18 knots an hour.😆😂😅
LMAO 🐸
Lol. That's funny.
Lay off the weed dude :'D
The laughing emojis give a clue in how serious I was being.
As did mine!
Gotcha
That's not how that works because you see, you're still traveling in a circle, just not a globe
!/
No, we traveled straight to we reached the edge and had to turn around. After that the Navy ordered new flat earth maps and sent their Quartermasters back to school to learn how to properly navigate a flat earth.😎
Just use the United Nations map
I hear it works in a pinch
I think the Navy used a couple of copies of those U.N. maps. Back when I was in the Navy the biggest secret fears every sailor had, and marines who were on ships too, was the fear of falling off of the edge of the world and having the ship swallowed up by huge octopuses, came extremely close to that happening a couple of times.😓😄
Seamonsters will be our undoing. Not nuclear war. :D
I wouldn’t doubt it. They’re definitely a threat.
Silly shills, don't they realize nothing can stop what is coming?
This
"this" classic reddit circle jerk
Whats a reddit ?
Theres a lot more to flat Earth than you think.
Theres a reason you were taught about Christopher Columbus and Ferdinand Magellan, and its not to increase your knowledge of worthless trivia, but to shape a model in your mind about your place in the universe.
On a side note, it looks like a lot of scientists are turning away from Big Bang Theory, so should we be allowed to discuss that, and their true motivations behind teaching us such rubbish?
And the moon landing is obviously a hoax, even if Q said it was real, because Q also said disinfo is necessary. Not sure why he wouldn’t just come out and say its a hoax, unless he didn’t want to distract us and take our eye off the ball.
the cabal have told me since birth that vaccines are healthy and the earth is round. I dont know much about FE, but if the cabal assure me its not flat I'ma go ahead and lean towards it being so.
You made a great deduction. I personally don't believe in a spinning ball but then we don't have an accurate rendering of a photo of earth from far away because NASA is total lying CGI bullshit. I have a feeling if only we knew, the extra terrain would blow our minds.
The earth is round but the bottom of our crater is not. Our world is flat.
Q said "moon landings are real. Programs exist that are outside of public domain." He didn't say NASA moon landings are real. He didn't say moon landings with people on board are real.
oh wow good point!
Moon landings are real.
The videos we saw may or may not have been faked.
I disagree.
The same dark occultists that own the MSM also own the space agencies around the world. The own our history holder like the Smithsonian too, who also plays a huge role in space narrative.
I don't know what the truth about our realm is, but it isn't what THEY are telling us. There are a ton of holes in the globe / moon narrative if you are honest and look into it.
The ratios in this thread show that there are way less people red pilled than they think they are.
You are correct.
If you can tell me ANY OTHER PLAUSIBLE REASON I can "ping" the mirror on the moon and get a reflection in the amount of time that Einstein says it would take, I am happy to consider it.
[The fact that you don't know what any of this means, means you are OBVIOUSLY qualified to talk about this subject]
Until then, there's at a minimum 2 globes, one's the Earth, the other is the Moon. We landed there, and placed a mirror there.
https://i.redd.it/vj64m1oq60211.jpg
No. I agree with this 1950's scientist that was quoted that the moon was plasma and I tend to agree with him.
Well, before you go far away, look closely at what is at hand. 1. Voluminous evidence of Giants all over the world. Smithsonian took each set of bones in the US and never showed them again. 2. Voluminous evidence of young earth, meaning Grand Canyon eroded over a short time due to great cataclysm (flood and upheaval) rather than some slow thin river. Compare to landscape around Mt St Helen's. 3. Actual flight paths across the oceans (while I don't buy into flat earth, there is something decidedly odd about every plane going way north but not way south to 'shorten' the distance?
Indeed. I have a post coming about this FE stuff. What it's distracting is from us legion.
I'm the guilty poster in the post, above. Agree with OP, I'll try to vet these posts and flair them properly in the future. That said, however, the post in question is worth passing around, as is. We are influencers, and we have all seen genuine news articles where jurisdictions go after people for selling whole, unpasteurized milk, living disconnected from the grid, or other ways that we choose to exercise our freedoms. Before passing things like this along to our social networks, ALL of us could be doing a better job of verifying all the information that's flying around. BUT. Y'all know we try to keep the content flowing. But, no excuses, we'll try to do better!
LET'S GOOOooOoo
Lol hello catsfive, I meant no disrespect to you, it was just a great example, which shows anyone could make the mistake and we shouldn't accuse each other of anything, but instead lift each other up and make this place even better.
I was actually about to send your posted image to a friend but decided it would be best to double-check the accuracy. I do agree, that the thumbnails are likely accurate, but I likely would have been called out by my friends once they found the real post.
Do you think it would be possible to get a new flair in? Like "Known Disinformation" or "Fake" could even be one
I don't mind at all. I post 20+ times a day so one or two is bound to slip thru the cracks. If me taking the 'L' helps the board, let's do this. Thanks for your hard work, frog!
I too post and some do get through(I make 30+ every day and night)...however not as many(slip through) anymore...We are all human and ALL of us make mistakes...Some people take the 'criticism' too far and make it personal which I don't agree with...Just be civil to each other...As for duplicate posts, just scroll past them! There's no need to stop and 'insult'....🙏🏻
Edit: Go Ahead and downvote...Water off a duck's back, just so you know...😏
I will say this, if you're spending so much time generating content that you're posting 30+ posts here every night, you should be acutely aware of misinformation/disinformation. That is a large part of what the GAW.win was created for: to identify the lies being put forward by the other side. You have the time to post 30+ times, so maybe reduce the number a bit and spend appropriate amounts of time to do basic due diligence on stuff from our own side.
If I post anything factual here, it'll be cited and I'll have at least made some effort to vet the content I'm linking, verify it's legit, and identify biases. Since most of what I post is medical/pharmaceutical in nature, that's the standard we have to have. If it's not cited, I'll typically make it clear that what I said is opinion, and even that should be supported by logic. As you said, no one's perfect, but we can take affirmative steps to increase quality, even if that means sacrificing quantity.
Upvote Perky for Village Press Director , polls close soon!!!!
Keep up the good work pal.
That's lazy bro, you just basically admitted to posting whatever.
However, I enjoy the irony of all you bemoaing the current state of media, but you can't do any better.
If you say so...bro🙄
I don't know about censoring, as many writers of OP's including those here I find very very good. Let us discern the information coming at us. I know if I post something that's false I have people here ready to jump on me and correct me. Iron sharpens iron as we say with bible studies. It makes us better and more informed. Just my 2 cents.
I too have passed around bullshit, but it was never my intention to deceive. But I didn't get wrong shamed or made to feel insecure, rather anons were patient in correcting my understanding of the information and that establishes how much further along we are as a community than most others.
Truth Social handle.
Right. I don't share what's posted here, just do some quick checks to see if its an obvious waste of time, or simmer on it a couple of days and see if it has legs.
LUXURY!
😂😂...
If I recall & understood it correctly, Q was teaching "bakers" how to find full truth & if they were unable to finish the work, hand it off to another anon.
Saw a fascinating thread on it once.
I don't mean offence to anyone here, and I know this isn't what you're claiming, but nobody on GAW should really consider themselves bakers. The bread that is meticulously prepped and processed on 8kun is an operational procedure that is exponentially beyond 99% of the content that passes through here. However, that bread is not primarily meant for end-user consumption. That is not, and has never been its purpose. So places like this (and voat before it) serve a much needed function in absorbing that content downstream of its original source.
But lets be honest, this place is 70% meme reposts from t_d. Another 20% of the "content" is somehow more worthless than memes, leaving us with a good 10% of info worth digesting, discussing, and sharing. I understand why the mods have left things wide open for participation here, but this is the downside of that approach. Especially when its basically been years since any Q drops of note.
I think the easiest fix to instantly clean this place up would be to drop a minimum character requirement for all new posts. I'm sure the mods have considered similar routes, but they have decided to keep things open and have this place remain more of a "rah rah" pep rally for Q than primarily a research and intel board. And I'm not knocking them or that decision, they're dealing with a much different crowd than the original group of us that migrated from the OG q sub on reddit on over to voat after the purge.
And to some degree I think the Q team themselves had reason to instruct the Watkins to nuke voat upon the steal and stopping of active Q drops. I think its been some benefit to scatter that original crowd to the wind the moment shit got real with bidan's inauguration. Cause if that group had been able to stay organized and remain in contact they likely would have been tempted to go into business for themselves and caused some major disruptions on a national scale. Instead we now have a platform in GAW that serves as a soft landing for normies new to Q, and I'm sure that's what's needed most at this time. I can stomach the memes and low effort content, but I really wish these fuckers would actually read the drops. Cause I can guarantee a large part of the userbase here couldn't be bothered to go back to the start and read them all. The content here is proof enough of that!
I agree. I want to see more substance rather than fluff memes. I want to see information on the Great Awakening, not some picture of Jesus standing behind Trump or more "har har, shitlibs are stupid" stuff. I go on 8kun from time to time, but I'm just not in the right time zone or something and I cannot get past the captcha for some reason.
Yeah just getting on 8kun can be a total crapshoot half the time now.
This is why I ALWAYS state "theory" or "research wanted". If YOU take a piece of unverified information and present it as fact, that is on YOU for trusting the information. We absolutely can agree to be better source providers, however the choice to present information and consequence thereof rests on each of us individually.
And of course remember to heed the rules. This isn't anyone's personal pulpit or conspiracy hub. It's Q shit first and foremost.
....and for the sake of Forums everywhere:
Before you post, SEARCH the forum for similar posts!
Also…. What if the prolific posters had their own aggregate column to the side so those so inclined could follow THEM. this would free up hundreds of slots in the open forum, as well as get a lot of duplicate posts out of the way.
agree
As much as I generally despise megathreads, they do have a lot of advantages:
One point of caution is that I strongly recommend the first post of megathreads be somewhat curated with direct links to key data that gets presented. It has to be selective of course, but no one wants to read through 1,200 posts worth of stuff looking for that one nugget of value that happens to be a link and which, without knowing it was there up front, you'd have no idea to search for it. I've seen Reddit megathread blow up well over 10,000 posts in days, and they're totally useless because of the noise, derailing, tangential discussion, etc.
No easy solutions.
That sounds like Telegram.
The problem there is that many people use the most inane, meaningless titles!
YES. Please, everyone, put a title on your post that contains Searchable Keywords.
If I'm trying to find posts on the Ukraine Power Failure and Blackout, and you posted about it but the title of your post is "HA HA HA HA HA" - I'm never going to find your post. Even if I do, I'm not going to look at it because why would I?'
This is very important because search already sucks enough as is lol. That's why I don't mind a limited number of reposts from time to time - hoping that the titles are different and show up in a search better.
Yeah, true, true.
I think we need a how to make a good title thread.
I'm wondering if the pursuit of updoots to gain a pepe might be contributing?
Honestly, I don't mind an off post once in awhile, as it is rewarding to see people catch it and downdoot and/or call it out in comments.
Good reminders to stay aware and research for yourself.
It’s a noble sentiment.
Implementation will be difficult at best.
u/catsfive, I’m really impressed with your response. Happy to be amongst a group of people who forthrightly acknowledge their mistakes and commit to doing better. Humans are mistake making machines… the need for grace is high!
Right back at you, frog.
When I am replaced with an AI, you'll all know it, because hell no can I be that perfect!
Agree. We all fuck up though. Usually if it isnt a fresh post a good read of the comments will have it sussed out for you quickly. We are a team here. A family if you must.
Also, please check to see if your article/story/news/etc has already been posted, PLEASE. Can’t say how many times a day I see the same EXACT post, almost word for word.
The back to back ones, I'm more forgiving as they were probably making the posts within minutes of each other and hadn't seen the other yet. Has happened to me. 😋
The way the board is setup makes it to simple to miss.
Maybe new posts should be vetted by,I don't know, mods?
It is DEFINITELY worth adding the link to the source.
u/#unacceptable
Less of this shitty mod sticky shit. Quality naturally rises to the top. And they often get waterfall out from brain dead hi info lo Quality info dumps. Speculation and theory has Z E R O value without solid content
Quality doesn't necessary rise--I see so many memes updooted while great posts with sauce get hidden at the bottom of the barrel. I think that the time/hour when a post is submitted contributes to this; posts definitely get more visibility during the hours that the bulk of the GAW community is awake and have more eyes-on to updoot the post.
My personal opinion: I hate to see the flow of information reduced here (even if for a good reason) but it does make sense that we want to be far more selective what we share outside of our trusted circle of frogs.
So instead of labeling and singling out shit posts, my preference is that all posts be assumed to be disinformation unless and until the author tags it in some way as verified.
So maybe, post something, do some vetting and even ask for our help if needed, but once verified, edit the post with some “[Normie Safe]” tag at the end and any notes regarding your verification process before.
And we agree not to share info with normies unless we see the “[Normie Safe]” tag at the end.
We shouldn’t become Twitter where everything needs a fact check to be shared. Just doing a better job of communicating WHAT level of fact checking we’ve done or haven’t done should be enough.
Edit: and yes my post history is tiny, I’m mostly a lurker / commentator who benefits from everyone else’s work. This is inspiration for me to step my game up here too.
Lol
Thank you for a constructive and much needed reminder. Post sauce or it's fake. Also, check the catalog before posting. I know sometimes .win gets latency issues and double posts happen, but we shouldn't be posting for karma, that's reddit shit. Keeping one post allows us to stay on the same one for discussion rather than being scattered. This has improved a bit recently so it's not as bad as it was. Also, I still think we should disable voting system in the comments but leave it for the original posts, because it creates a false impression of the content of a person's response. As soon as you see the ratio, it makes people believe it's not worth reading. It's a soft censor to be blunt. We have the reporting system and rules, that's plenty enough. The downvote is what gives the shills power. If you disagree or want to challenge a statement, just do it. Don't lurk and jerk. It may not be possible to remove it but it would greatly help.
It used to be that the bump order was judged by the amount of discussion within the post on forums like these. While not a perfect system (its really flawed on the chan's with GPT bot posting), it did make for a more dynamic discussion. But that's why I say the upvote system for posts isn't necessarily bad
The moderators should put a limit on how many posts any individual can make in a single day - we have people who do NOT take the time to determine if a topic is already posted here. multiple posts on same topic.
Some people post 20 - 40 posts a day with no sauce from super obscure websites . . . C'mon man, get a life
The anon that posted that is the lead mod, lol.
I do agree a limit on the posts you can create in a day would be a good thing.
I think, if they had access to HTML/javascript/PHP then it would be a cool feature, for there to be a pre-post check to see if the same link/image has been posted and to at the very least warn the poster that this has already been a post within the past 12 hours.
Good point. There's a reason people want the sauce.
I pass on about 70 percent of the post. Rather than censoring, let people learn to discern. From the sound of it many are still sleepy and closed minded about the truth.
The kids that sit all day and night to stay up late on the weekends if they’re not grounded and post random things to make people uninterested while watering it down. Those are tha REAL kewel kids. Just 💥🔥 cool
Thank you very much for your post and I'm glad it's stickied. I've been saying this exact same thing on many such posts: Verify before you post! Do your due diligence as a truth seeker! We are here for the truth and nothing but the truth (maybe also memes), so let's not let our guard down or get lazy, we must always assume something could be faked and not verifying is destroying our credibility as a whole.
Is there a lot of real FE followers? Perhaps create a communities/FlatEarth board? That way a community can for to discuss that.
And one more small request. Would you please read a few of the new posts before you post your breaking news. I don't need to read 50 posts telling me the queen is dead.
Maybe? but mods don't have HTML or javascript access they only have CSS access which would make that hard to do. But I agree, unless its a shitpost, maybe there needs to be some sort of source.
FBI RAIDS CDC
That was a fake news headline put out by “Sorcha Faal”, a notorious, well-known propagandist.
Every pro-vaccine blog picked up this “fake news” story and ran with it, and framed it like
LOOK AT WHAT THESE STUPID ANTI-VAXXERS BELIEVE!
And of course, “anti-vaxxers” didn’t even know what to think, because it was the first we had even heard of the story.
So i did some digging, to get to the root source, which is how i found Sorcha Faal,
But every blog had the same basic template, like
“According to (blog B) the anti-vaxxers believe (bullshit)”
Click on link to (blog B)
Blog B says, “According to blog C…”
And blog C links to blog D,
D links to E…
Literally dozens of articles, all citing one another in a massive circle-jerk.
Obviously not organic, obviously coordinated, and obviously the intent was to smear-job the anti-vaccine side,
Presumably because the actual vaccine debate wasnt going their way.
Check it out
http://google.com/search?q=FBI+raids+CDC+Sorcha+Faal
Isnt it weird how google pretends like they would never deliberately link you to misinformation or disinformation,
And yet, you can find Sorcha Faal’s propaganda no problem?
http://google.com/search?q=Sorcha+Faal
Blogs are a horrible source for that exact reason, they all use other blogs as a source and if you can find the source material whatsoever it is usually heavily exaggerated upon. Of course there are blogs where people post well sourced material and include citations where needed, sadly these are far and few between all the low-effort ones. Before linking to a blog post it would be best if people looked into it A LOT more than most people seem to.
How about history posts that have some kind of scholarly reference. I realize much of historical literature is 90% opinion on 10% facts, but giving a source or three and the background of the authors doing the reporting would do a lot to keep myths to a minimum. For instance, if you knew a certain assertion originated from the Spanish Inquisition, you would know a lot about the authors biases.
As a history buff, I would love this. I was at one point creating a history website. Maybe I can instead start posting history. Maybe I should make a separate username for it. If i did what should my username be?
Here I am
I made Robert_E_Reeeee and tried to post but i think it will take time for my handshake to actually be able to post
hehe thank you for the suggestion
Robert E Reeeee Is amazing.
Sherlock History? Time Revisitor? There's a historical theorist, Anatoly Tomenko, who maintains that the only history we can rely on is astronomical observations. Pretty stringent, but safe. However, we have over 4000 years of literacy here and there through the world, I think we could triangulate toward the truth a lot better than some of the things that get posted here.
Unfortunately, my deeper understanding of history only really pertains to American history. I think I am a good stepping stone for Normies though as all of my histories, contradict the left's perverse version of history yet is backed by the library of congress archives.
Well, I like ancient history, which is so fragmentary, but it doesn't matter, every story has an origin and people posting about it could say whether they read it in a book or saw it on TV or heard about it from their grandmother's best friend instead of presenting something as fiat truth, then readers can dig as they do on anything else. :) and may I add, here you go, with "the left's perverse version" as I said, opinion rules. They think your version is perverse. Why does this happen? Some of these debates are open to logic and some just aren't. Perhaps the problem is that people can't empathize with the past enough to value systems based on different premises. Example, Isis and the Taliban blowing up the last remnants of vanished cultures because they weren't Islamic, or all the wokeness cancelling the Civil War relics. Yet history definitely has repetitive patterns and lessons for the ages.
I understand your sentiment and I think that the method plays into the two-party paradigm. I do feel that there is an underlying evil that infiltrates all parties and systems, and I will back each data point up with some sort of quality evidence.
I think if there is anything archetypical in human thinking, it's a tendency toward casting everything in polar opposites. Introvert vs. Extrovert, Libertarian vs. Authoritarian, good and evil, day and night. The twilight zones don't persist. Evil is corrupting and harder to reverse, it does seem like everything slides in that direction.
I agree
https://greatawakening.win/p/15JUCepqrh/psaki-circles-back-one-more-time/c/ I will direct you to authority first.
So Biden isn't actually a clone?!
100%. We are being lied to about many things, but the BRT doesn't pass Occam's razor imo.
I've seen videos on BRT and interviews with professionals who do photo forensic on the different Xidens... I'll try to post it for you, but not sure if I have the time to search for sauce. The sauce for BRT does exist.
Okay, I will take a look at it, when I come across it.
Why don't we make our own group of 8 to go over posts to discredit/prove them?
Kind of a "citizen mods" team?
Let's call it the "Gang of Eight,"
No, better, let's call it the "Mod Squad!"
Nah...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fz1K9UCpLRo&t=6s (timestamp)
You have an opinion, you don't really have any verifiable objective proof that can withstand scrutiny, so calm down and don't be so butthurt that the narrative in your head although convincing to you, isn't so convincing to others.
Can we PLEASE get the foul language out of the thread titles?!!? If I try to recommend this forum to some conservative normal people, they're gonna get turned off real quick from the language.
That's fine. I'm just trying to get people onto the main index page. If they can bring it to themselves to click on a thread, they can deal with it from there. I'm not opposed to a little bit of language once in awhile, but c'mon, at least be Rated-G in the THREAD TITLE! 😠
I agree that it's unnecessary to use and unpleasant. But it's doubtful that its something enforceable without causing a pretty big split in the community. I guess we as a community should just comment within posts to repost without the poor title? That may be a start.
Just the thread titles. Cuss as much as you want in the comments.
I wish that was the case. I agree with your sentiment.
Good comment, I think that it's a double-sided blade. We should assume we have been lied to since childhood and be open to controversial ideas, We should also be careful not to then assume wild ideas without very good evidence that is objective, verifiable, and stands up to scrutiny.
Open to controversial ideas? Certainly. But it comes with the caveat that those alternative theories have to be supported by evidence. Claims without evidence should get rejected. Claims based on poor quality evidence should be viewed with extreme skepticism. We see a lot of inference, hearsay, and other circumstantial or completely unverifiable "evidence" being put forward and treated as dogma.
Examples: "The moon landing was fake" posted with a link to a shady blog that doesn't offer anything other than links, ads, and a wall of text under a 4hr YouTube video by some Paytriot who spends half his time hawking product and reminding me to "smash that like button, share, subscribe, and donate to my Patreon" vs "The moon landing was fake" posted with the famous Neil Armstrong video footage and a detailed physics-based discussion about how what we see (like the flag waving in zero gravity with zero atmosphere) is not possible.
"[Insert home remedy here] cures [disease] with link to known BS sites like naturalnews.com that tells us about how some guy tried it and got better or this is what his great grandmother in the old country did vs. "Ivermectin cures COVID" with a link to a 70-study strong meticulously sourced and documented meta-analysis showing the evidence for the claim along with the quality of those studies, with each one cited to publication or pre-publication link.
And the last example is a rabbit-hole one because it's so much harder to verify:
"Adam Schiff is a pedo" posted with a "See Standard Hotel. Do your own research" vs "Adam Schiff is a pedo posted with links to images of the guy dressed as a female doll or as a baby with his arm around a little black boy and a reasonably detailed description of the allegation that he was seen at the Standard Hotel with 2 black boys, abused them, killed them, and disposed of the bodies. Here, we can't verify all of either claim. But the second has some evidence that can be put into a larger context, and instead of trying to create mystery and send people on a wild goose chase, actually points people to the answers to the question rather than wasting people's time. With some of this Q stuff, you don't have to provide everything, but you do need to provide enough to convince me that there's something there other than an FBI entrapment scheme.
I completely agree. Quality comment.
There are a lot of pure speculation and assumption that somehow becomes gospel on here and elsewhere.
"China will shut down biolabs in Taiwan." OK maybe, but they didn't even shut down their own in Wuhan. All I know is that China is assho'.
"That dance Trump did in Saudi Arabia with King Salman signified that the King relinquished his sovereignty to Trump." This is complete BULLSHIT. I have a good friend in KSA and he said it's a traditional Saudi folk dance for welcoming guests, dignitaries, etc.
"Suicide weekend means that butthundred godzillion people will all commit suicide at once on a weekend." BULLSHIT. Can't it mean just the suicide of one significant person? Maybe Hunter?
People just run with stuff without thinking, and people get caught up in this crap.
I Could Not agree more...Spot on...I talk from experience...🙏🏻