Trump's announcement of the Kash Patel nomination had some very strong and definite language.
I am proud to announce that Kashyap “Kash” Patel will serve as the next Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation.
Note, he did not say "I nominate him."
https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/113574572759738919
On the other hand:
The FBI director is appointed for a single 10-year term by the president of the United States and confirmed by the Senate.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Director_of_the_Federal_Bureau_of_Investigation
So, if this is correct, Patel would still require a senate conformation...
However, there is a plot-twist here, unlike other 'cabinet' positions. The Head of the FBI is appointed for a 10-year period.
That raises an interesting situation. As CBS news tells it:
For Patel to take the post, Wray would have to voluntarily vacate the position or be fired by Trump if he is to be replaced before his term ends in 2027. One source previously told CBS News the Trump team was aware of the complexities involved in ousting Wray.
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/trump-to-name-kash-patel-as-fbi-director/
How Would an FBI Director under Trump 1.0 have to Behave?
If the above info from CBS news is accurate, then Wray would have to resign or be fired by Trump, because his 10-year term began in 2017.
This situation brings up a certain issue, unlike say, any of the other positions like Sec of State, or Sec of Def. etc - these positions are not appointed for any specific period of time, as far as I know. (Someone correct me if I'm wrong!)
This unique circumstances might well be an important reason why Wray,l if in fact a patriot, has had to appear as such a dastardly fellow, even though Q stated quite clearly "Trust Wray".
*Trump 2.0 is Different from Trump 1.0 and Necessarily Requires Different People with Different Talents.
We know DJT has been saying "I didn't know who to appoint in 2017", but that could easily be a cover story. Because if Military Intelligence actually asked DJT to run, then they had a clear plan, and they KNEW most of what who was DS and unreliable, and who wasn't.
Either way, we've seen how the Trump 2.0 lineup is VERY different from Trump 1.0 lineup. All new players (with a few exceptions). That's logical if the first administration was:
SETUP STAGE, i.e. playing hard against the Deep State but providing an example of how good the US under Trump could be, before the
HIATUS STAGE, where Biden is "in power" and the reality of what the DS and Cabal controlled Democrat Party want to do to America drives home the need for Trump to the wider majority of the American people.
Let's face it. Biden has been the biggest Red Pill dropper since Q. Moreover, Q targeted anons, but Biden's Red Pills have hit the broad midsection of normie America.
So, it makes sense that EVEN if Wray was a good guy deployment, a switch out would be appropriate for the next stage of the Operation. The HAMMER stage.
HAMMER STAGE would be where a real shredder, like Kash Patel, would come in to get the Real Job done.
BUT, how to get Wray out or the way?
One Possible Scenario where Wray is Indeed a Patriot
Taking "Trust Wray" at face value, i.e. that Wray is in fact a patriot, consider this.
ONE
Putting Wray in there at the FBI to accomplish certain things, during the first administration (watch, get all the data, map the layout of the Swamp in the FBI, but also act to get it under a level of control, then) the redpill Biden administration (Continue to hold the fort, while ALLOWING the FBI itself to red pill the US population through all sorts of Biden-like red pilling narratives. I.e. that the FBI is corrupt, and part of the Swamp system.
TWO
If DJT had tried to put things in order at the FBI when there was NOT the public support or mandate, could it have been done properly? If not, then what do you do? You get control of it, while allowing the rotten elements to expose themselves, both in terms of committing business as usual crimes (and gathering all the evidence on them while they do it), but holding it in place so expose the apparent corruption to the public.
In terms of waking up America, has Wray's FBI been a negative or a positive? A BIG positive. Like Biden himself.
THREE
Having Wray LOOK bad but having him actually steering the ship UNTIL the time for the HAMMER is ready, this allows DJT the leverage to either fire him or have good MAGA support to call him to resign.
So, considering that Head of FBI is a 10-year position, I do not think its reasonable to think that DJT just appointed Wray when Wray is a DS goon. That would frankly be gross incompetence, considering what is at stake.
Instead, appointing a patriot who could get things under control behind the scenes, to minimize deep state effectiveness in that arena, but then also allowing him to act (kayfabe) in ways that to a normie, conservative MAGA public look bad.
We've seen the FBI play along with lots of red-pilling this last 4 years, and that might well be all deliberate. Yet, even so, other functions, like arresting human traffickers, etc, appear to have ALSO been advancing. IF you've been watching the information war, you've noticed a dual sort of reality being reported.
On one hand, the FBI is "totally corrupt", doing all sorts of rat bastard things, and on the other hand, some core, critical functions like what you would expect a good FBI to do have also been reported.
Hmmmm....
Benefits of the Kayfabe Wray Model
Personally, I think Wray has been playing a role, and is not DS. If indeed Wray is a patriot, then the role he has been playing has specific benefits for us:
a) it has allowed Biden to keep him in place with the DS and DC swamp NOT calling for Wray's resignation (so he can continue the place-holder/controller position, limiting DS damage and having a leash on the FBI apparatus),
b) staying in the FBI, Wray could then oversee but still allows a certain element of rogues to do what they do in order to allow the public mandate for someone like Kash to be created, to expose to the Public the very real corruption that existed in the FBI for decades, even if in fact Wray got it on a leash...
c) potentially allow DJT to either fire or ask for his resignation with the support of the MAGA base. Non anons are going to be thinking that Wray is certain swampy and that "the entire FBI is corrupt". Heck, even some anons here believe this, but if you listen to Kash Patel, that's not his publicly avowed view. He says that the top is the problem, and the system, and that there are good people in the FBI.
There would be VERY real benefits to running the Head of FBI operation in this way over the past 7 years. Anons who do not at least consider these benefits are being foolish, and should hand in their anon ID card. This sort of thing would be RIGHT IN LINE with 5G warfare. Although Q never stated it, "Infiltration goes both ways."
If Wray looks like DS on the surface, then there are going to be a lot in the DS at least guessing if he's their guy or not.
Q & "Trust Wray"
Wray is mentioned in the Q drops 12 times. Q writes "Trust Wray" three times. Disinformation? Or a hint to anons to learn to look beyond the surface and really ask ourselves, what is going on here?
What does "Learn Our Comms" actually mean? If you are not at least considering that kayfabe might be happening, and that the Patriots might WANT the DS to think Wray is or could be their guy, then you are NOT thinking in the level that Q wanted serious anons to think on.
Q exposed a lot of people around the world to how intel operations work. They educated us, inspired us, and helped to 'train us'. Such that even after Q stopped posting "You have more than you know". We have a handbook for training ourselves to think like intel operatives.
And, its worth asking, even if you consider yourself anon, are you still actually subjecting yourself to the manipulations of Psyops (good or bad) by thinking with or reacting with a normie brain? What does it take to make a good intel operative? "Secret info"? (rhetorical question. No.)
Real effort is required to put the pieces together.
Example
"Oh, the FBI raided Mar-a-lago! See! Wray is a corrupt deep stater! Scumbag! I don't trust him!"
That's real normie-level thinking. But a serious anon has to consider other things, other than just appearances. I.e. that Trump was the one who announced the raid to the public, that Scavino foreshadowed it a few days prior, that the raid has actually BENEFITED Trump and Trump's campaign and ALSO helped to build a very strong public mandate for Trump 2.0 to actually bring a hammer to the entire FBI operation.
Because NOW, a large enough number of Americans have finally got through their skulls that the DS is corrupt, and that the FBI has been real poison for decades.
"I take all these slings and arrows for you". The Lawfare against Trump has only done bad things for the Deep State.
Who Is The Real Wray?
We might never know if Wray is a real patriot or not. Or, it might take decades to find out. However, to figure things out, we simply cannot reply on appearances. So we have to consider the Benefits, the Impact of actors and actions.
But if Donald Trump approached you and said "Look, I want you to put you in the FBI, and you'll have to walk a tightrope, a delicate line, so that the real (and murderous) Deep State isn't sure of what you are doing, of how little or how much they can control you and the FBI, for the next 7 years, until we can really Drop the Hammer on it once the people are on board."
"It will mean that you'll have to appear to be playing ball with some of the worst people who hate our country. The average American's may well think you are a piece of shit. But I need someone who can do this. Can you do it?"
What would you say?
A real patriot would have to consider "am I willing to sacrifice my reputation and legacy in order to help secure the future of the country?" This isn't a game. It's deadly, deadly serious.
The history of the Deep State Cabal in American politics is the ugliest part of humanity. It has destroyed so many lives, murdered, raped, and committed the worst possible crimes. Would you be willing to sacrifice your reputation and legacy to help bring an end to that? Would you?
Undercover cops live that way, and even then, they can only ever be thinking to help get a few bad guys, or maybe even one cartel.
This psywar, information and narrative war is playing for keeps, for the whole country. The whole world, really.
What Does it Mean to Be "Anon"?
We CANNOT afford to ignore the requirement of looking and thinking deeper about things, and we CANNOT afford to simply let our emotional reactions run like mad horses driven by the whims of propaganda, media and the appearance of good or bad. The emotions do not help here. Not for good intel operatives. Your emotions, if not carefully controlled, will get you killed, mentally, physically or intellectually.
One of the most important aspects of the Q operation was NOT finding the oooh, secret information or pointing out who we think is good or bad. It was getting us to apply intel community level thinking but as citizens, as digital soldiers. As I like to call it, a Civilian Intelligence Militia.
So, I reiterate, we cannot simply rely on appearances. We HAVE to consider the benefits, the losses, the impacts of actors and actions, and whether they benefit our side or theirs, or what. The real benefits, not the 'apparent' benefits.
In light of the unique nature of the 10-year appointment of any head of FBI, and the needs of both Trump 1.0 and Biden (redpill) 1.0, we must consider whether Q's emphasis to "Trust Wray" was in fact what it seems. A heads up to thinking anons to think outside the box, escape groupthink and reactive emotionally responses to what we would soon observe, and to trust that there is indeed a deeper, well-constructed plan. One that will require different forms of sacrifice.
These are just thoughts on the topic. I might be close to the truth, someway near the truth, or far from the truth. In zeroing n on the truth we benefit from listening to others, weighing out our own limitations and learning to apply the lessons Q tried to teach us. I look forward to any discussions that this post inspires.
Great post man.
Don't mean to distract from the rest of the post, but getting rid of Wray is as easy as firing him. Except for Mueller, no director has served a full term since Hoover. And Trump fired Comey, proving its legality.
So Trump could easily appoint KP to the assistant director position, a position that does not require confirmation, and then fire Wray, leaving KP as acting director.
Very well thought out post. Thank you. It reminds me of when Q said,
“While difficult, it is important to understand this must be done BY THE BOOK”
I always had a hint that “by the book” meant more than just “do everything lawfully”
If there actually is a looking glass and was part of this, things must be done exactly as seen through the looking glass, otherwise they wouldn’t come to be.
interesting point that I have not fully considered before.
I think Wray is as deep state as you can get and Evil. I don’t care what Q said about him. He said the same thing about Pompeo.
Absoulutly. We have have trust Wray and fat ass who both should hang . I’ve said this for years . On the other hand you have Q throwing A Jones down the steps ,,I’m not hear to sing praises about AJ , but seriously let’s be honest . Wray and Pompeo have done way more damage then AJ has ! For Gods sake AJ has woke people up patriots and J6 families have suffered the unthinkable for years because of Wray . Both Wray and Pompeo are evil and should both hang !
Q drops actually never said Trust Pompeo, it said Trust Kansas, anons just assumed it meant Pompeo.
Per quod. If not Pompeii, then who? Doubt the drop was talking about trusting the state of Kansas.
IMHO, Wray is dirty. He will have his day at a GITMO tribunal to defend himself against some very serious charges. I see him hanging from a rope before all is said and done.
I tend to agree with you. I don't think that Trust Wray necessarily means he's a white hat. He could just be predictable. For example, he might not be DS but he could have zero balls and is a coward, thus he predictably will take the path of least resistance when confronted with an ultimatum ....as others have pointed out.
But.
I am willing to eat crow pie (so to speak) if Wray voluntarily steps down so Ka$h can swiftly step in AND if he doesn't plant landmines for him.
Maybe predictable, or perhaps even compromised and controllable by the WHs. Mebee... thoughts?
You're Fired. Trump has no problem firing someone.
"FracT" - Awesome Job!! I have read that it was over before it got started...IF that is so..then the stage was already set, and actors in place for 2020. IF the Cabal, at least in the USA was functioning...They would have put in a Sheriff Taylor...NOT a Bumbling Deputy Barney "Brandon" Fife.
Wray arrested. Military tribunal for treason that's how... simple
Excellent thought sum-up of Wray. The end point about being an anon... so many of us use some very in-depth critical thinking in such a wide array of fields. For so many it comes down to a point where they realized EVERYTHING from the mainstream media is propaganda. From there it doesn't take long for that sheep's wool to be lifted and to finally start applying normal critical thinking to politics, the deep state, etc. Its like a personal little "drip drip drip, flood" that happens. Regardless - good post.
"Trust Wray" Here is what I think it means. It says "Trust Wray" to screw up. In that same way, Q did say "Trust Kansas," "Trust Grassley," and "Trust Barr" and they screwed up. Chris Wray screwed up by allowing January 6th to occur. He could have stopped everything and even could have fired the agents that conspired to commit treason against the United States, an action that halted certification of the 2020 election. We all know Bill Barr's treason even to the point that Barr likely helped plan January 6th. Mike Pompeo is considered to be Kansas since he is from that state, but I think "Trust Kansas," meant that Kansas screwed up by electing a Democratic Governor and approving abortion. Finally Chuck Grassley screwed up by not voting for Rick Scott to be Majority Leader.
Sometimes I sit in my easy chair and ponder Q and how he could possibly spread his message to the masses. Now, think about this pedes, would Q talk to a normie and give that normie some inside information, without that normie knowing it was Q? I read articles by Joe Lange and wonder how he comes up with his ideas. Is he that bright or did Q give him some tidbits and say, "go look into this". The writer of this post comes along and pens a piece about how Wray is a good guy doing the heavy lifting for Patriotism yet he wraps himself in the trappings of the deep state to keep those evil POS from stabbing him in the back. Did FractionalisingIron get a post-it note from Q that said, "Wray is a good guy, write about how he could be doing Trump's work and hiding out from the deep state." Other great contributors on GAW strike me as Q's wordsmiths for spreading finer details of the Q plan to the normies. Q did say that there were only ten members, three civilian and seven military, so I don't think there are enough of them to effectively spread the word, yet they could leave clues and hints for normies to pick up and follow. OP, thanks for this post. It is a great exercise for us pedes to remember to use our brains to figure out the Q plan, and not rely upon missives from unknown sources as the only repository for Q information. We need to read everyone's point of view and figure out for ourselves if it passes the Q test. OP, your post does pass the smell test for me. Thanks.
Nah homie you are dead on it. Ever since Wray got appointed, I knew "Wray is a sleeper". And I'm so glad you brought up the biggest misconception of this entire intel op for the public..
It's not to play "Clue", and minimize it to an NCIS episode, which is most normies mentality (once question A gets answer B, they are "educated" now, and now any other opinion is now a debate or argument against the popular opinion), it's to intentionally break the stigma of people, lead them down the proverbial rabbit hole if they so dare, where they have to keep their own light, find their own path, get their own evidence, and actually consider multiple possibilities and consequences, while keeping their heads low and spirits high. Those who maintain sanity in the journey, receive peace of mind and go on to prepare others. Those who don't, try to light a fire in the tunnels and prevent others from progressing.. also known as "doomers and shills", who assist the false idols who probably were either already in those tunnels, or forced into them by their handlers. These people gatekeep information on the social media scale, while the MSM gatekeep as they always have on the traditional broader media scale.
In any circumstance, the mission is succeeding; the rabbit hole is lit up, and the rats are escaping. Those who have been playing "Clue" still are now shocked at all the rats escaping, and are now interested in breaking their stigma to learn what the hell is going on. This is where we are now in the plan timeline.
Thanks for your views.
It reminds me of the discussions we have had about Mueller and Rosenstein.
Q:
and
We have been going back and forth about it, since the onset, without a real resolution, as any view can be places next to the opposing view.
I feel that we have the same situation here. Is Wray a patriot? You bring up some very good points!
I also am conscious about a view expressed by a dutch comedian called Herman Finkers in his show: After the break: (he was diagnosed with cancer and had to take a break). He had written a song called: A Friend:
https://youtube.com/embed/PF1yG-ljoTk
At least you get the gist, certain idiom is typically language dependent. At any rate, it allows for the following consequence as a supposition, opposite to what you considered:
Q:
and
From what position? Can you trust an enemy to do what an enemy does?
This bring us to the question of likelihood of either supposition. Which, I think, currently is difficult to answer.
You can "Trust Wray" if in fact the Trump team has been controlling the demolition of the deep state cabal within our government for the last 4yrs...this will be TRUMPS 3rd term, we've been watching a scripted SHOW, someday we'll get the whole story...it would have scared too many people and the bad guys would have used that chaos.
This is a wonderful read. I'll have to bookmark and read this again from time to time. Thanks man..
I think we've always wondered about Bill Barr as well along with a few other names. And interestingly, one way to tell if an anon is a shill or still normie is how they react to news and how they judge people at face value. This is 5D chess and many patriots do need to play patsy or bad guys to infiltrate and break DS apart from within. Also, why would Q, DJT or anyone in his team reveal their plans out loud. This is a warfare - lots of head fakes and behind the scenes. I'm quite certain we're only reading or hearing about 10% of what's really going on.
“ We know DJT has been saying "I didn't know who to appoint in 2017", but that could easily be a cover story.”
“Trust Wray” could also be a cover story. I think Wray is a traitor to America. When I saw him testify at his conformation hearing I thought he was a slime ball, nothing since has changed my mind.
Wow, that's a lot of good food for thought. I don't think it's reasonable to rule out what you're saying. If this is true, then we would owe Wray a big debt of gratitude. Clay Higgins is a savage true red-blooded patriot. If Wray is playing this role, I don't think Higgins is playing a role. I think Higgins is genuinely righteously enraged at Wray and trying to put the fear of God in him for what is coming.
I've zoomed in on the picture of Wray in this X post by Rep. Higgins that was posted here by purkiss80:
https://greatawakening.win/p/199hzQLCh2/rep-clay-higgins--mr-wray---/c/
I could see the possibility of that being a face of someone with the weight of the world on their shoulders, not necessarily because of guilt, but because of the weight of the burden of an extremely difficult but noble cause.
Either way, taking down the cabal is not for the faint hearted.
The q drops deserve a university level degree course to analyse and assess them as a part of history. Hell, one could justify a PhD in history on a thesis involving Q and the meaning of the drops at this point.
I've been feeling almost prophetic with them over here as no one I met in Europe or the UK seemed to think trump was going to win until it already was practically over. To me it wasn't a surprise, or even a question to assess of if it was going to or not going to happen.now the questions are simply who is kayfabe, who is a traitor, and who is a patriot.
Wray is a big ❓ for me. On the one hand, he executed the raids and presided over the FBI during a horrible time in its own history. I mean the list isn't short: J6 & Ray epps, the weird counter right wing insurgency ops with those guys in masks (patriot front? Can't remember as keyboard warriors like us rendered their cover story into irrelevance about 2 days after they appeared on scene), Diddy investigation, epstein investigation, mar-a-lago, the nonsense investigating "right wing extremists", etc, etc, etc. All on his watch. To "trust Wray" is a hard sell.
That said... On the other hand, he could be the equivalent of biden's regime for the DNC, except he's done it to the fbi rather than a political party. It's hard to tell really. If he did play that double agent type of role, it has been a class act of epic proportions. He galvanised half the nation against the fbi, and now everyone is happy to see someone like Kash come in and do a mass DECLAS of its shenanigans.
Imagine if Trump tried this in his first term with the positive view most had on the right of the FBI. It would have gone down like a lead balloon for most people, and instead of desire it would have been chagrin when the details came out. Now? We're all actively chomping at the bit to have it now, and so are most of maga too. That isn't trivial.
Because of this, I do think Wray is kayfabe... mostly. 60/40. Which is probably by design, given so much is still hidden.
In 2018, shortly after Wray was appointed, an attorney whose office was near my secretarial desk had a visitor. Normally clients only go to the reception floor. But she was escorted down to his office and I had a chance to size her up. It was Wray’s wife. The attorney was a well known Democrat. They were very chummy. She was getting their estate work either done, or changed. At the time Wray was touted as being a strong Republican. I could not understand why, with all the estate attorneys in our city, she chose one that was such a fervent Democrat. It was deliberate. What floored me was how pally they were.
I have always read it as Trust Wray to be Wray....meaning that he could be a white hat in disguise OR that he is a predicatble bad guy.....
Whichever way, in the long run he will be used to create more good than bad.....
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f68wH7Dc_lU
I agree with all except for the part near the end where you write that we might never know if Wray is a real patriot or not. I actually think that part of the reason that he will decide to resign is so that he can give testimony of all the corrupt players. I makes him look good on the long term & Once Trumps next term officially begins, I don't see the reason why he needs to hide it anymore. In fact it could help optics if he resigns by publicly stating just that. He will need 24 hour security but it could speed up the prosecutions.
Great post. Especially the last part "What does it mean to be 'anon'"
excellent post!! TY
Good case made. We'll see.
Brilliant move by Trump
Excellent post, thank you so much for sharing your thoughts on this topic.
Agree. I think Ray will be in the garden of hero’s.
Great post u/FractalizingIron you have definitely set the stage very thoroughly and accurately posited the stakes at hand.
My personal feeling is that Wray is NOT to be trusted, and that all of those calls by Q to [trust "so-and-so"] amounted tothinly veiled disinfo placements by Q for us to consider and conduct later analysis on [just like we are doing now!]
I think in the context of the statement what Q means with that ever critical word Trust is really to trust [said person] to do be on his worst behavior, and do their best job at being a total piece of [DS] slime that will act with impunity and be beyond reproach with the support of the scumbag unelected administrative state [the DS as a government within a government]
That's a long winded way of saying Trust them to act out the part we have prescribed for them. I believe that they are following the breadcrumb trail accordingly and unaware [mostly, or at least they can't pivot in any reasonable sense from the path they are on] of what their effects on the citizenry have wrought.
Trust them to be what they are and in the process red pill the public of America in the most massive way possible.
Biden is of course takes primacy when it comes to this as you very astutely explained. That said, the other malign actors like Garland and Wray fulfilled an important role when it came to erasing trust at specific levels by following their orders with jolly exuberance and unflinchingly carrying the Administration's water for it.
The setup and execution of the entire "Trump operation" (or whatever term you like for it) essentially gave them all the rope they would need to hang themselves and ever so reliably they walked STRAIGHT into the trap beginning with stealing the election for Biden, Bill Barr and Wray refusing to put any effort into investigating the election questions, followed by the fraudulent psy op conducted at J6 and on and on.
Dependable to fulfill their obligations to our mission: i.e. commit to EVERY LAST FOOLISH AND UNLAWFUL ACTION requested by the Biden admin and expected by the Trump team, carving out an indelible record of illegal and unconstitutional behavior unique to anything in prior American history and with so doing creating a cascade of outrage and sympathy in the hearts of the American people, who have a track record since our founding of identifying and standing passionately against injustices by those who hold power.
Trust that they will step into their role and they did so, with merits! 🤣
If Wray is an asset, then I feel it stands to reason that it must be the ENTIRE Biden Admin is in on the game and I just can't bring myself to believe that some like Blinken and Majorkas have been working on our side all along.
Great conversation and post OP, happy to have the opportunity to share my thoughts. Godspeed all and NCSWIC 👍
tl;dr Wray’s mother Fay was the victim of a deep state ape and he is a WH.
Very well done post!!!
If (and it's a BIG if) Wray is to be trusted, his behavior during his tenure could be easily explained. He's simply there to behave like an agent of the Cabal while gathering intel on the entire operation. That operation is then handed to the demolitions expert (Patel) so that the building can be brought down as efficiently as possible.
But again, it's a big "if" and I won't pretend to know who/what Wray actually is.
That being said, it is a certainty that very good people have been in place for years and often decades and doing very bad things while they're there to maintain their cover for the right time.
The term we used back in the day was "sin eater". It takes a special human being to be a sin eater and not be damaged in the process. I hope Wray is one of those people.
Just fire Wray. He's served his purpose even if he is a secret WH...
What if Wray rides it out all the way until 2027 before KA$H gets in for the final end game phase? I hate the wait, but love the style on that take. If that pans out, hopefully trusting Wray pays off, then tees up a dunk for KA$H until 2037!!!
We'd all enjoy mainlining that hopium!!!
That isn't up to Wray, whether or not he "rides it out" until 2027. Trump would have to leave him there, or somehow be so hamstrung that he could not fire him and bring in Kash.
Does not compute
GREAT input Fract and scenarios out the Wazoo,wont have to wait much longer,i hope,"TO BE/fired OR NOT TO BE/fired THAT IZZZ THE QUESTION aint it. i'm taking door #1,remember misinformation is part of the plan also.
Or...we just wait and see. Much easier than tying my brain into a pretzel, and the only thing that counts is what actually comes to pass.