Again, here is a copy of the Law of War manual for reference. https://dod.defense.gov/Portals/1/Documents/law_war_manual15.pdf
To start you off, I posted this a few months ago and it explains how the Geneva Convention rules apply when there is a foreign occupation and how the United Nations could get involved if international rules were not followed. https://greatawakening.win/p/13zg9ZWTFC/hello-patriots-i-took-some-time-/
That post led to a conversation about the start date of the occupation. If we have to wait a year, when did it begin? Did it begin when he won the election, when the election was ratified or did it start on inauguration day? I think I found the answer.
If you look at 11.2.4 (page 749) in the Law of War Manual, it says "there is no specific legal requirement that the Occupying Power issue a proclamation of military occupation."
However, it also states "A proclamation may help fix the date of the beginning of the occupation. The proclamation may also advise inhabitants of occupied territory of the rules with which they must comply. In particular, the proclamation may be used to advise inhabitants of changes to law, including penal law."
There it is! "The proclamation may also advise inhabitants of occupied territory of the rules with which they must comply" What did Biden do on his first day in office (Jan 20th)? He signed 17 executive orders telling us the rules with which we must comply. When he signed the EO's, he changed the rules and that was his proclamation of occupation.
If we go to page 1073 section 18.9.3.1 we find " Grave Breaches of the 1949 Geneva Conventions"
Grave breaches of the GC are those involving any of the following acts, if committed against persons or property protected by the GC:
• willful killing;
• torture or inhuman treatment, including biological experiments;
• willfully causing great suffering or serious injury to body or health;
• unlawful deportation or transfer or unlawful confinement of a protected person;
• compelling a protected person to serve in the forces of a hostile Power;
• willfully depriving a protected person of the rights of fair and regular trial prescribed in the GC;
• taking of hostages; and
• extensive destruction and appropriation of property, not justified by military necessity and carried out unlawfully and wantonly.
I think it is safe to say that Biden has broken most, if not ALL, of the rules established by the GC. The grave breaches will be used to prosecute him and anyone who participated in this belligerent occupation.
If we go to page 1126, section 18.23.5 "Conspiracy"
The term conspiracy is defined as the combination of minds in an unlawful purpose.
Page 1127, section 18.23.5.1 " Conspiracy to Commit Genocide"
The Genocide Convention provides that conspiracy to commit genocide shall be punishable. Thus, mere agreement by perpetrators to commit genocide may be punishable even if no preparatory act has taken place.
Page 1119, 18.22.3 Official Position Does Not Relieve a Person of Responsibility.
The fact that a person who committed an act which constitutes a crime under international law acted as Head of State or responsible Government official does not relieve him or her of responsibility under international law.
Page 1120, 18.22.4 Acting Pursuant to Orders Does Not Relieve a Person of Responsibility.
The fact that a person acted pursuant to orders of his or her Government or of a superior does not relieve that person from responsibility under international law, provided it was possible in fact for that person to make a moral choice.
To summarize, just following orders will not be a defense, being a head of state will not be a defense and if you conspired with this plandemic, at any level, you will be held responsible and charged with conspiracy to commit genocide. I think Fauci will be the first arrest. "First arrest will verify action and confirm future direction." Q Imagine what will go through the minds of all these liberals when he gets charged with conspiracy to commit genocide. "What did he inject me with?"
How many world leaders will be arrested along with him. It is a conspiracy, "combination of minds in an unlawful purpose".
I think it will happen soon and the cabal knows its coming.
They tried to pass HR-1 in a gutted NASA bill yesterday, They are desperate, they are panicking. Enoy the show.
I have more, I will post it later.
Stay safe my frens!!
WWG1WGA!!!
Great post!
I agree; Fauci would make an EXCELLENT first arrest.
Here's a stunning post about the medical field -- which has long been nothing but corruption and malice -- that expands on the Mt. Everest-sized red pill that a Fauci arrest could lead to. All by itself, this topic could mean the end of the Cabal.
https://greatawakening.win/p/141F5nWheh/i-spent-4-years-at-an-ivyleague-/
Brilliant..yes!
Before Trump brought him into the limelight…only a handful of people knew who he was.
Once again, Trump is brilliant.
I agree. Fauci is the thread that unravels everything.
100 percent. Fauci and Bill Gates arrests would be great.
Thank you for your research. Very few people doing that on this forum these days.
They both need to face a firing squad for what they've wrought.
i appreciate the time and scholarship devoted to this. Still reading and rereading ur prev post. ? who are considered protected persons?
The above definition would seem to apply to most of the US population. There are further definitions, however, such as:
Thank you.
Don't forget about "the arrival of a foreign dignitary" cannon salute. That was on 1/20/21
That was huge for me. As someone who is prior service, I can tell you that this was most certainly not a mistake. The military takes drill and ceremony surrounding the president extremely seriously.
I too believe in the seriousness of that event. Thank you for service, fren.
Also the fact that they weren’t all standing in some type of respectful formation for Biden’s motorcade procession. Some were saluting, some were slouched over and looked like they were just hangin around w/ friends, and some literally had their backs turned, which seemed the most disrespectful of all. It’s been so long since those posts w/ that video, I can’t remember if it was verified that the video was taken during Biden’s procession, but even if it wasn’t verified, it still looks like the soldiers with their backs turned were deliberately doing it as a sign of disrespect and who would they want to disrespect on that day other than Biden? 🤷🏼♀️ Not in the military so I’m definitely not an expert on this topic but I feel like most of us at least have a sense of or an idea of what kind of behavior is expected of soldiers during ceremonies involving the president. I’m always interested in what military people think of that video. Ps. thank you for your service!🇺🇸
Oh yes…huge reveal for those with eyes open.
Arrival of a Foreign Power.
Couldn’t be much clear than that 5:5
That's one of the biggest tells, especially for anybody that has been around not necessarily a swearing-in ceremony, but anything major.
In other words...
Datefagging is back in style Bois!!!
This is why it's called the Great Awakening... not the Great Global Arrest Extravaganza
I like this term better. Mods - can we change the site to TheGreatGlobalArrestExtravanza.win ?
LOL I am sure the people that have jumped ship would prefer that name as a way of satisfying their need for instant gratification.
Thank you, you beautiful autistic frog
We have some really great minds here on the board! I love how you tied this altogether! I thought you were leaning toward biden being the first arrest and then you went with a worldwide favorite in fauci. His words, his actions, his agencies have created worldwide MISERY!!! Removing him will halt the dangerous vaxxes, lockdowns and containment camps for the intelligent unvaxxed. In my mind, no one could have a greater impact then fauci. I look forward to seeing your next posts!
I have been reading sporadically through the manual, specifically Chapter 11 and 11.3.
The expression "one year" occurs 15 times in the document. None of these refer in any way to allowance of one year in order to be able to do "x", in in sections related to Occupation under Chapters 10 and 11, refer only to a period for the application of the Geneva Convention.
I'm really wondering where the idea that someone must wait 12 months (one year) in order to be able to do x started from, because I cannot see it in the actual manual.
Moreover, who must do the waiting? Who is the belligerent occupying force?
If the belligerent occupying force is the Cabal, and a state of war exists between the Cabal and the White Hats (legitimate US government), then why on earth would 12 months be required to do anything? In war, if your enemy takes your territory, you can fight to take it back. That's called war.
Seriously wondering where this (must wait 12 months) theory originated. Seems to me its derived from the concept that the US government has not been the legitimate US government for more than a century, because it was corporatized.
Any hints in finding my way through this maze appreciated.
There must needs be time to persuade the perps to cease their activity, and a reasonable time frame is one year. This has been established through 2 world wars and a handful of large skirmishes that were politicized into combat (Gulf of Tonkin "incident")...
AND there must be time to wake up the normies to what the "occupying force" is doing to them and their country. GENOCIDE is a big deal, and this latest attempt with the plandemic may end up being the worse genocide in world history.
That is worth waiting for. I know this doesn't answer the question of "why a year", but it does make sense that time is needed for the populace to EXPERIENCE tyranny vs. hearing about it from "conspiracy theorists".
Thanks. I fully agree that time is needed. For me, the key factor has always been (well, for the past 2 years) the People. This was really driven home thru 2021, right? It makes no sense for DJT to walk away.... unless it had to be this way. That the DS and Cabal had to be completely and utterly exposed to the People, and that this only really takes place at the precipice.
So, yeah. Time. What I have a lot of trouble with is a) the idea that "you have to wait one year in order to be able to....?" and b) that the 11.3 marker points to the Law of War manual. Neither of those assertions makes any sense to me, and I'm sort of bewildered how others can attach to the theory so strongly, without even offering any real or factual basis IN the Manual itself.
I can not understand your reluctance towards the one year requirement-international laws that the United States has signed on to are binding at this time. Should these be found to have been initiated illegally-as all cabal based treaties/agreements may be spurious. But this is well into the future when "The best is yet to come" happens..
thank you fren. I appreciate your efforts.
I think you misunderstand me. The question is not whether I have some reluctance towards such (I don't) but whether such a one-year requirement (to not engage or respond to a belligerent occupier) actually exists.
I'm listening to other sources now, and the key points have become clearer - the need for not acting against one's own population, doing 'by the book' etc. However, but the source for the "one-year" stipulation still eludes me and the reference to 11.3 I still find .... unenlightening.
thanks again.
I have shown you the door, YOU must open it and walk on in...
Hehe. a good admonition. one I like to share with friends when considering Christ:
"knock, and the door shall be opened."
I may have mentioned, I listened to Juan o'Savin podcast in which he expounds on his views re: LoW. It clarified many of the larger concepts, but I am still far from being convinced (due to absence of certain answers). I also have issues with o'savin himself, including his general presentation style, motives, etc.
I resonate much more with patel Patriot, for numerous reasons. I have not listened to these yet, but I would be interested to hear your opinion. (I'll be reviewing these tomorrow - its passed midnight here)
https://rumble.com/vsz5ev-patel-patriot-interviews-iet17-on-the-low-manual-and-more.html
https://rumble.com/vsyhvd-patel-patriot-devolution-power-hour-11922.html
Have a great day.
That seems exceedingly arbitrary.
In war, you fight. the Manual of War re: occupation deals with when the other guys (your opponent) controls your people and rules they must follow in order to preserve things properly, and not be open to war crimes. Didn't you ever watch Hogan's Heroes?
WW2 took 5+ years, WW1 four. Persuasion to cease activities is called surrender. The enemy doesn't do that just because you wait for a period of time.
We are dealing with CCP owned "Americans" in a territory separate from our own states, a totally different war is being waged now. What you seem to be asking for is Civil War, where battle lines are drawn and defended-which is not in the best interests of the sovereigns of this nation, US..
I I appreciate the response, but ... (screeches brakes) hang on, I'm asking for what???? (OK, gonna ignore that rather lamebrain remark)
If I read you right, you are talking about CCP occupying Washington DC. Is that correct?
Are you saying that 12 months is required to convince the CCP that what they are attempting to do will not work? To what effect? So that they pack up and go home? So that the Cabal says "oh well, we tried. Let's give up now"? ("cease their activity")
Or something else?
12 months, while 'reasonable' seems very arbitrary to me. And besides, the whole premise the OP is working on is that there is some legal reason why 12 months is required before the legitimate sovereign can ... what, act to reclaim its own territory.
Sorry, I cannot see how your assertion here interface with the Law of War manual, specifically Chapter 11.
There ARE Constitutional restraints that MUST be followed for a takedown of the occupiers to truly work: Law of War, the Geneva Convention and whatever other treaties The United States is a signatory of. The 'combat' aspect is the arrest of the traitors and the constitutional requirements of a fair trial that must be maintained-since the courts are hamstrung with corruption and the Maritime Law, the tribunals will be held to pursue justice in a timely manner.
BY THE BOOK, or risk being what we are prosecuting..
Not trying to be snarky, but do you believe our "judicial" system is operating under maritime law?
Very much so, the language the lawyers use obfuscates issues and as a result only lawyers can 'interpret' the law. Common law is Biblical and plain spoken..
' EXACTLY "
At this point, meng, I fail to see where the Law of War has any bearing on a 1 year period from "start of occupation" (aka Jan 20). Chapt 11 refers only to when application of GC ceases, which is one year after war is finished (hostilities) but continues otherwise during the period of occupation.
Also, how is LoW, or GC, etc, a 'constitutional' constraint?
If the Black Hats are the occupying force, how and why does the GC apply to the legitimate US sovereigns, who are not (in the scenario you describe) in occupation of the Enemy's territory? Or are they? then where?
Naturally, if the legitimate US sovereigns are holding arrested combatants, then the GC applies during the period of war (hostilities) towards treatment of those combatants.
I'm trying to put together what you are saying, but so far, it makes no sense as far as I can see.
I can't account for your mental block here.
"year is the period of time that the GC is in effect while the occupiers hold territory"
Um, no. Re-read Chapter 11. The GC applies during the entire period of occupation. The one year issue only kicks in after WAR is finished (end of hostilities/close of military operations (aka WAR)).
In other words, GC is ALWAYS in effect while the occupation is current. The occupier cannot merely annex the occupied territory. Claim to the territory has to take place thru a treaty or such.
"this is all being done "by the book" so that people can tell the difference"
I disagree. If it's all being "done by the book", its because the white hats ARE different from the Cabal.
Are we looking at it from the wrong perspective? Could the occupying power be the legitimate authority of the United States government in exile through devolution, with the occupying forces the States National Guard and the occupied area being the corporate entity UNITED STATES OF AMERICA?
We are the Sovereign power wronged by the occupying belligerent force and we have evacuated DC for the sake of Continuity of Government. We will exercise our reprisals according to the Book.
I think you may be missing my point about the corporate UNITED STATES OF AMERICA theories. If this were true then Washington DC is a foreign entity separate from the rest of the Nation.
I am no expert on the law. But I took the "year and a day" requirement to be aimed at the occupiers, not the conquered.
In other words: If what looks like an occupying force moves into a place and occupies that place for a year and a day, that proves their intent to go right on being an occupying force.
Now they've got no other excuse to be there. Now they have proven themselves to be nothing but belligerents.
Now it's showtime.
If the conquered people rise up against them before they've proven themselves to be belligerent occupiers, then UN and/or NATO troops have the right to come in to protect civilians and keep order.
So, we wait a year and a day to:
and
Somebody feel free to correct me if I'm wrong. u/mengderen
We are NOT conquered; we are beset with traitors and other pests in DC AKA The Swamp The belligerents are outnumbered and now exist on borrowed time.
can you point to where this idea stems from? I mean, in LoW or such. (Otherwise, is it mere speculation?)
LoW appears to disagree with this idea. Reading through LoW regarding definition of occupation, etc:
11.2.2
The belligerence factor isn't determined by an occupation.
In other words, it is the FACT of occupation that determines whether some action is an occupation or not, rather than some legal agreement or other conceptual definition.
Hogans Hero's??? Really??? That series made light of real POWs travails and made the guards look like buffoons which, be most assuredly, were not the case. Better if you watch The Great Escape instead..
You think strangely, Meng. I've watched GE many times, more than once.
(Am I right in guessing that English is not your native language?)
Point is, what the Geneva Convention applies to, and what it is related to.
I am amazed that my writing strikes you as my being ESL.. 🤣 I am an American, born in a Navy hospital midway between VE Day and VJ Day. I was born with a very patriotic last name by the Grace of God, served in the US Navy just before Viet Nam erupted. 😎
Hahah. OK. No offense intended. I'm a linguist, with extensive experience in several different languages, both spoken and written, and also have a strong background in teaching ESL.
I'm glad to know you. I'd try to guess you're last name, but maybe not!
Thank you for the many replies you have made and taken the time to share your understanding on the topic. They are appreciated.
Except for the one year issue, you have proven to not be obdurate and are actually trying to unbake your noodle... At some point you will understand that history is often remembered in treaties and agreements and it is up to us to understand and cherish them
At 76, there isn't much that generates fear, so getting doxxed would not be considered a bad thing by me-you won't find my "voice" on FB, after 10 years on that infomill, I nuked my account a year ago..
My two cents. And that may be all their worth. I not convinced that there necessarily needs to be 12 months. I think that we are in a holding pattern in waits for a larger number of normies to be mentally able to accept a large disclosure event. What the disclosure event is, who knows. It’s probably multi faceted.
That is far better than collateral damage from kneejerk responses. Once again the GC has final legal say over a situation what we face-an armed invasion requires nothing but the will of Congress to declare war immediately ("a day of infamy"), but this is a case of subversion and treason from within.
your $0.02 will surely gain interest.
I agree: the schedule of the unfolding process is very likely a combination of different factors, including red lines (markers, eg. Potus banned from Twitter), other developments, plus the awakening level of the population. I.e. a combination of holding patterns and continuing work.
The "12 months" thing makes zero sense to me other than some arbitrary conclusion some people have jumped to, as there is nothing in the LoW manual that even references the 12 months, (I searched) and any references to "one year" are related to obligation of an occupier (note: NOT to the legitimate sovereign) to adhere to Geneva Convention AFTER the war is finished.
I think you are on the right track with your supposition:
That a government is incorporated is by no means a problem. The problem is when what appears to be a US government, it not operates on the basis of the correct authorization but completely rogue due to the ending of the bankruptcy in 1999. The whole body politic should have been re-authorized by the then eligible voters, from county, state, federal, etc. Instead the FLorida Chads happened.
You are looking at a ruse. A movie, Q would say.
See: www.lastflastanding.com
can't find exact place but first I read of this was in patel patriot devolution series
Wow, really? Sure about that? OK. I must have missed it. I should go back and read.
Edit: PP devolution compares Trumps exiting the WH, etc, with MacArthur leaving the Philippines, and also with the government in exile by the legitimate govt (sovereign) of the Philippines.
I think that's a very interesting and in many ways plausible insight. However, I must have missed the part where you have to wait twelve months before you can reclaim your own territory bit.
sarc: I mean, the Mob invades your home, holds your family hostage, and you have to wait, what "10 days cooling off period" before you're allowed to attack them and defend your family?
Can you indicate where in the GC or in LoW manual where you get these assertion from. I'm open to what you are asserting if there is actual, factual evidence backing it up.
So far, zip.
Please provide quotes if you are so sure, coz as far as I can see, its not there.
Apologies for source, but:
The only references to "one year" in LoW chapter 11 refer to obligations of the belligerent occupier for one year following cessation of hostilities (aka war is finished and over). Nothing about the sovereigns being obliged.
Anyway, if you can back up your assertions with actual factual evidence, I'm really happy. Otherwise, they are weak as water.
Heres the difference between your mob analogy vs the "belligerent" occupying force.
Biden and the CCP used normal means to obtain power through our elections. They are belligerent because they are an occupying entity using illegal means to justify power.
Whereas with your mob analogy that would be a true act of war with a physical attack and would not be considered belligerent because of it known as a true enemy/threat.
Um, I'm pretty sure that "belligerent" simply refers to "war", so if it's a true act of war, then yeah, it would most definitely be considered belligerent.
https://www.dictionary.com/browse/belligerent
In the mob analogy, "belligerent" becomes an adjective, meaning aggressive, hostile, etc. In LoW, "belligerent occupier" 'belligerent' means "engaged in war", ie. a participant in a war who occupies enemy territory
I think in the Biden + CCP statement you make, you're misusing the expression, as "aggressive, hostile" (which they may well be) but in discussing LoW and law surrounding belligerent occupation, it means the latter - participant in a war.
You are mistaking civil law between good folks and perps with international agreements forged throughout history from conflicts that often started by a misunderstanding (WW1 was started by a minor Austro-Hungarian royal couple getting assassinated-within weeks, everyone was rattling sabers and then, BOOM) The Civil War was nearly the last set piece war to be fought because of ranks of soldiers firing at each other to prove they could beat attrition. WW1 was the first mechanized war and men were expendable and the methods of killing were utterly insane.. these infractions of human decency finally sank in and efforts were made to codify military conduct during battle..
Perhaps you are right. But can you point to where in LoW or GC there is such a stipulation that a sovereign cannot lawfully engage in action to reclaim their territory over a period of 12 months? All LoW says is that an occupier is obliged to uphold GC for up to one year AFTER the cessation of hostilities (= war finished, doesn't it?). Says nothing about a sovereign being obliged to do squat.
I do get that there is a natural distinction between law vis-a-vis civilian life/persons/etc, and military law, but either way, where is the stipulation people keep talking about? It's certainly not in LoW manual that I can find (and I've been looking) nor has anyone been able to actually point to the content in LoW that upholds this assertion (the one year non-action clause).
PS. I went back to PP's devolution series, and in all articles 1 thru 9 there is no reference to LoW manual whatsoever. I haven't checked 10+ but I think Elle's idea that he/she first saw it in PP's content is wrong.
You are seeking confirmation about your confusion, and this convo has lost its appeal. Researching with an agenda yields little..
Understood. Thanks for your patience thus far.
let's move on.
(The only agenda I have here is to find the source or origin of the "must wait one year without action" premise. But I agree, at this point, it feels like a horse flogged to exhaustion!!)
That was Slag's "Wartime President" actually.
Another question, 39.
By the way, I should say first, congrats on the effort and the digs. Whether your theory is accurate or not, digging and theorizing is the first and most important step to finding out pretty much anything, so well done. Now...
In your previous post:
Question: 11.3 explains the end of occupation. Chapter 11 as a whole, explains the nature of occupation and the constraints and obligations of an occupying force.
Where does the concept of "legal authority" to take one's own territory back arise from, and why on earth would it take one year?
If you invade my country and occupy one of my states, and we are in a state of war, then surely I can attack and retake what is mine.
Moreover, you state that the manual explains that the GC applies to both belligerent occupier and the occupied territory, but no where does it suggest or imply that it somehow applies to the original sovereign of the occupied territory (which is what Trump and any legitimate US govt would be).
All the manual says is that the occupier (i.e. Biden + China) is obliged to observe the GC.
How do you extrapolate this to somehow infer obligations on the legitimate sovereign? The manual states that occupation is defined by fact. I.e. control.
If Trump occupied (belligerently) what is legitimately China's territory, for example, then yes, the GC would applies to Trumps actions. Law of war.
I cannot find anything in the manual that refers directly or indirectly to obligations by the sovereign OR any limits on what a sovereign may do in order to recover their own territory. Am I wrong?
signed, eager for clarification or illumination
This is where I am confused as well. Why would they make a rule that would prevent an invaded country from fighting back for up to a year? Only reason I can see Trump waiting a year for GC rules to be up is that there would then be no threat of globalist NATO/United Nations getting involved under these rules?
In this scenario, Trump is the legitimate sovereign. It makes ZERO sense that the GC applies to him (it doesn't, and cannot), because its his legitimate territory and people who are occupied by an illegitimate force.
The only logical scenario that I can see is that the UN could get involved if BIDEN violates the GC. And if Biden is a belligerent occupier, why would Trump not be perfectly justified in attempting to regain the rightful territory? Wait 12 months? Makes no sense to me.
Maybe I'm wrong, but so far, I just don't see it.
The alternative makes sense to me: devolution. Sadly, for devolution to work properly, the People and the World must wake up. The Key to this is the People.
The white hats war gamed it all, extensively, and came to the conclusion that the Cabal must be taken down piece by piece, like deconstructing a nuclear bomb with about 20,000 different intricate parts. That takes a LOT of time. Have to do it right, to totally defuse the bomb.
Meanwhile, the People have to wake up enough to be able to handle the truth. That also takes time.
How it progresses depends on when certain markers are reached and accomplished, just as with the launch of a Rocket into space.
Q posted the Nasa countdown system, to reinforce this important fact (in my interpretation).
https://qanon.pub/#2679
11.3 marker makes 100 percent sense in terms of applying to the 2020 election, because that date was fixed in stone. Future proves past because the White Hats war gamed the entire 5-6 years, from when Q operation began, until and beyond now.
They knew that the election would be stolen, expected it, and laid the trap. We expected totally different things, like the 2018 being a red wave, and were confused when it wasn't. (so many red wave memes from that year). Meanwhile, the patriots were laying the foundations even then to change, modify, trap the 2020 elections.
I recall someone raising the 11.3 etc all applies to the War Manual (I downloaded it exactly 1 year ago, when that theory came out) but have failed to see the logic so far.
I totally agree the year rule makes zero sense logically unless these are the globalist rules and the GC rule allows a year window for NATO/UN to come in under the guise of being the good guys. Meaning if Trump came in before that year rule was up we’d now be fighting a war with NATO/UN, so waiting a year would mean that window was shut on them by their own standards. I’m no war expert just trying to make some sense of this year marker if it indeed turns out to happen.
Hmmmm.....
OK, food for thought. Thanks.
Interesting choice of words.
They have been fighting their war using lethal injections instead of bullets.
Interesting
Who has her laptop
Too sensitive, fren. You came off just fine in my reading. Me, on the other hand.... too often let my frustration get the best of me, when I'm really just looking for answers.
Dude, you've made this point on this thread like 3 times already in the form of a question. Why don't you go research it yourself and let the group know if you're so fixated on the 1-year supposition???
From what I read from OP I don't think he is claiming (datefagging), he is adding to the idea that when the occupying force makes a "proclamation" and he surmises that that happened when Xiden signed those executive orders on day 1.
Do you disagree with OP's supposition or are you just going to copy/pasta the 1-year distraction on this thread OR will you do the work on your own question?
Meh. You kinda assume too much, don't you? I've been going over this for days now, by which I mean, reading the LoW manual, analysing it, checking to see if there is any basis for the assertions.
I'd prefer to ask the question of the OP, to see if the OP can back up his/her post, instead of just saying "you're wrong".
Funny that you're accusing me of copy/pasta and not actually doing the work. I guess different people have different approaches to actually digging, posting, and discussing.
But I could have been more clear. The first quote in my comment above is from the OP's previous post where he lays the assertions on which this current post is based. (OP would have recognized it, but perhaps no one else, unless they're paying the same level of attention to this that I am).
The second quote in my comment above is from the actual LoW manual itself.
I'm attached to the 1 year issue because so many people appear to be accepting it as gospel when no one, as far as I can see, has provided any evidence in the LoW that this is relevant.
In the current post, I don't really have any disagreement with the OP's supposition re: proclamation, in and of itself, except that the flimsy and unsubstantiated nature of the assertions people are letting fly (i.e. using reason, instead of actual evidence in LoW) makes me doubt most of the whole premise.
For example, one dude mengderen is asserting that the belligerent occupier is Biden camp, another one is asserting, no, Trump is the occupying force.
LoW discusses obligations of the occupier to uphold GC, and does not refer at all to what a sovereign cannot do.
No one said putting the pieces together would be easy. Patel Patriot does a masterful and sterling job of laying out the Devolution theory, precisely because he ONLY focuses on facts and evidence that is there, and clearly distinguishes between interpretation, speculation and the actual evidence.
I'm yet to see any of that sort of diligence around the "mah one year" assertions or theory.
Researching with an agenda yields little and you are the poster child for fruitless endeavors...
OK, I'm going to take that as a constructive criticism.
Thanks for your sincere reply.
The law of war manual is quite clearly what we should be following, so kudos on a nice breakdown of it.
However, I do not believe it will be Biden who is arrested. I stand by the theory that he's playing his part and that everything he does was put in place beforehand. He's been a straight up redpill suppository. That's not their playbook.
I do believe it could be someone like Pelosi, fauci, ... Someone like that.
You're basically watching a puppet show. Only some didn't know they were in it. Imagine their fright when they realize that their entire surroundings are being manipulated and they can do nothing about it.
Every move makes it worse. Like being in quicksand
Yeah, they’ve got Biden by the balls. Look at ALL the dirt in his vile son, Hunter. No one, and I mean NO ONE can survive in this world doing what they want, their way, when there is so much dirt on them and their family. That’s what we call a puppet, folks!
Or a jim carrey
I believe he said Fraudchi not bidan.
Gotcha
Then I agree
Except the "Biden" we see is an actor, not the real Biden.
That's a moot point.
Let's say it is an actor. The result is the same because the majority of people believe it to be Biden. Anything he does is on Joe Biden
Thus the reputation of Joe Biden is going down the toilet. Look at what Tina Fey's acting did to Sarah Palin. People all over the world think she's a moron due to a good scene.
This also might explain Trump’s “rally’s” - or better yet - the fact that he isn’t running for anything technically - he’s addressing the nation subversively. For those who have been paying attention anyway.
How so? on what basis?
In what sense can the government of Biden be understood to be ruling under martial law (which is what belligerent occupation is)?
11.1.1.1
....
DC is the seat of this belligerent occupation, owned by USA Inc. traitors beholden to the CCP.. Let them continue their patterns of behavior to their ultimate demise.
OK. I got that premise. But the OP's assertion is:
https://greatawakening.win/p/13zg9ZWTFC/hello-patriots-i-took-some-time-/
OP is asserting that there is some legal reason why one year must pass before .... certain actions can take place.
I don't see it.
Fwiw, I agree that a state of war exists (I agree by and large with PP devolution theory), and that it must be handled in different ways to regular war, and yes, let them continue to their ultimate demise. I'm even pen to the possibility that DC is "occupied" territory that is outside the US (open, but not convinced, as many parts of the Federal govt apparatus exist outside DC, don't they?), but I fail to see how the Law of War manual applies to any of this, or why 11.3 marker refers specifically to LoW 11.3
Thanks.
The entire 20th Century is fraught with wars that consumed the worlds resources, human and material, and the effort here is to be a better humanity. All this horror because of no restraints. This is what formed the LoW, this is what propagated the GC. DC is the focal point of the occupation by the CCP, and devolution has removed Continuity of Government to the hinterlands, so to speak. What remains are the willing and knowingly treasonous USA Inc board of directors. 1871 firmed up the corporation and 1913 weaponized the corporate Maritime laws..
The 11.3 marker is the END of occupation, i.e. removal of the belligerents..
OK. Thanks. I'm starting to form a better idea of the framework you are coming with. And, I'm actually kind of open to that. However, how does this 1 year thing work in in your framework. Some people, like the OP, are asserting that there is some legal reason (or lawful basis) why DC cannot be recovered and belligerents removed for "a period of one year".
The OP's assertion here is A) "it's the law" and not B) "well, one year is a reasonable time to let normies wake up" or whatever.
I'm curious as to where do you stand on that point.
This work that PDJT initiated with the admonishment that everything must be done by the book-i.e. the Constitution, LoW AND all treaties and agreements that the USA is a signatory to.. Just because you can't find what you are looking for means you are incapable of thinking outside the box and make foolish assumptions along the way.
I appreciate the sincere criticism. I'm really quite certain that I am very capable of thinking outside the box, so I'm not really perturbed by your comment here.
Thanks.
What would you call "mandatory injections" by decree? I could call that martial law by a dictator. That's not out of the realm of possibility especially with everything else going on - this is a war, so maybe Xiden declared martial law w/o us knowing?
Just a thought, no sauce.
Some other violations of the LoW: The house passed a resolution to make DC the 51st state; the taxation of the Sovereign nation is not allowed, the imprisonment of the J6 people is just not being held under humane conditions, this POW status is violated.. Many more violations are being piled on daily..
The aspects of 'martial law' are there but used for tyranny over the Sovereign nation..
Good post, thanks.
Moar please. 👍
Solid dig fren.
TL;DR
On Jan 21st Trump has permission to get yucky with the boys.
Brilliant! Nice work.
REMEMBER; They over-threw a legitimately and duly elected president with their election steal. THIS IS/WAS A CONSPIRACY. This was a COUP D'ETAT. This not only applies to LAW of MANUAL, but US laws of RICO.
We have Military Laws and we have US Constitutional laws. Because this is both 'foreign & domestic' which one supersedes the other?
Trump has said many times; '... this is worse than Pearl Harbor and attack on 9/11. Our country was attacked.' (He doesn't say; 'act of war' or anything referring to a proclamation of war).
sometimes i think some of these posts are from the military giving us hints lol
10 4 good buddy
Of course!
Possible that many of the sealed indictments are for those involved in this sort of conspiracy?
Fantastic information and diligence in your research! I've been anticipating 1/20/22 since I became aware of Geneva Convention rules being applied to a foreign occupation.
There is a strange stillness in the air where I live this am. Everything seems quieter than normal. As if subconsciously people know this illegal and hostile government is going down. And that goes for the many lefty and liberal minded folk in this city who voted for these clowns 🤡.
Bring on the pain! Rip that bandage off and let's begin the healing process asap.
200% agree!
Good work,thanks for posting.
Tomorrow, Jan.20, will be one year of occupation. That should be plenty of time for the occupying force to have "seen the light" and cease and desist. Personally, I would love to see tanks and Marines retake DC and round up all the collaborators.
Not expecting but would be glorious
I think I'd like a slick announcement of Fauci's arrest and perhaps "My fellow Americans, the storm is.... " on Twitter somehow.
I am trying to figure out how the Army’s training against freedom fighters fits into all this. Is that a cover to take down domestic terrorists the cabal might unleash? How many PLA agents are here? How many Islamic terrorists are here? How many BLM people are gonna do crazy shit? Or is there is civil war within the military?
There are at least 22 "training camps" filled with jihadis across the country, PLA sleeper cells all across campuses and much more that were allowed in during the oblamer years-see Minnesota. We are besieged by elements of hate that are like a bubonic plague upon our body politic.
There’s a camp in NY. Some dumb kids from WNY got arrested a fee years back for plotting to attack it. But it’s real.
I believe it’s cover to take down BLM and Antifa once they’re unleashed
I hope so. I live in a Liberal shithole and there are most def stash houses and skinnies about.
There are weird signs in really shitty neighborhoods with a color/logo that correspond with shirts I’ve seen people wearing.
Skinnies 🤣🤣🤣🤣
Replace freedom fighters with antifa
Thank you.
END OF BELLIGERENT OCCUPATION;
Q related posts;
10 days of darkness
Fast & Swift
First Arrest
Shot heard around the world
Movie Clip; 'It's going to be Biblical, I'm bringing the whole f*ing system down.'
Unlawful deportation and confinement?
That's the January 6th detainees.
solid post and seems to fit right in....time will tell...thanks fern
Thank you for sharing !
Lord Jesus, Bring judgement and JUSTICE, bring it swift and complete in our country and worldwide. Bring protection for any who are innocent or are truly repentant and turn to you. In Jesus Awesome and Almighty name, Amen
Wow.
Great dig fren.
Great work, fren! Thank you!
Juan O Savin talked about this the other day. He said there are legal thresholds to be crossed on the 20th concerning the military, but that doesn’t necessarily mean they’ll act. He went through it in his usual rambling way (along with his signal breaking up) but didn’t seem hopeful that things would happen soon.
Yes, if they were to act at 00.01 tomorrow morning, the cabal would be on guard. Perhaps the white hats can now act when and where is most effective. I hope it's soon though, I want the vaxing to stop.
Thank you for this. Saving to go through thoroughly.
They hid the voting laws into that NASA Bill! They want to continue their cheating to the only way they can win. Eyes on, we are all on to their shenanigans! Notice some 28 politicians are not running for re-election? PROOF POSITIVE the rats are jumping ship! The light has been turned on, the cockroaches are scattering!
Could you explain this in more detail? Are you referring to USA Corporation occupying the country? If not, who is the occupying power?