Durham bombshell: Prosecutor unveils smoking gun FBI text message, 'joint venture' to smear Trump
Special Counsel John Durham revealed he has unearthed a text message showing Hillary Clinton campaign lawyer Michael Sussmann falsely told the FBI he was not working on behalf of any client when he delivered anti-Trump research.
Oh yeah, I remember this Durham fellow!
he had a full head of hair when he started xD
So did I
Kek
🤣😂🤣
Wasnt he supposed to have concluded and we were just waiting on a report of some kind? /s if ya didnt guess
Me too, isn't he the guy who built that boat for George Washington
I can't figure out what is new in this article. They mention "In a bombshell court filing late Monday night, Durham for the first time suggested Hillary Clinton's campaign..." , but what date? They show a court filing from 4/4/2022 which was a monday. So this is old news?
Yeah why is this pinned? Sussman was acquitted of lying to the FBI about this. That's not to say he didn't lie, but the fact is he was acquitted.
What is the new info?
I'm not blaming the OP. I saw the article earlier and couldn't figure it out. It was an article from today.
As near as I can tell from archive.org it's the exact same article as the last update. Word for word. Could be a site glitch or maybe Solomon is trying to drop us a hint.
FWIW: He did also post it on his Twitter account so there would seem to be some level of intent behind it...
https://twitter.com/jsolomonReports/status/1640399179741642765
Here's the filing referenced:
https://justthenews.com/sites/default/files/2022-04/04519147331.pdf
I even went to archive.org and downloaded an old copy of the file and ran a checksum and they're the same.
c0dc8ceb1222a259e03d0a2522fb04a8 04519147331 (1).pdf c0dc8ceb1222a259e03d0a2522fb04a8 04519147331.pdf
I looked in the filing for any references to March and found none.
IMO a bit of a spotlight is being shined on Sussman for some reason.
John is talking about (confusingly) two different items in his article.
No new sauce, none of this makes sense.
Now that Hillary’s campaign has pleaded guilty to the FEC for calling RussiaGate “Legal Fees” the campaign is a co-conspirator with Joffre, Sussman, et al.
Right. This is confusing. We saw this email last year during the trial. Also, this story talks about the late Monday evening filing but the story was published Monday just after noon.
Conspiracy! Say it with me: CONSPIRACY. Now spell it with me C-O-N-S-P-I-R-A-C-Y.
That is what is new. The early trials against Sussman and Danchenko were to pierce the veil of attorney-client privilege and to get some facts entered into the record without the threat of RICO and/or seditious conspiracy hanging over their heads and broadening the case to soon. There are some important points that wont need to be argued now.
Timing is perfect. Wonder what NY DA, Fulsome DA and SC Dumbass do now with a seditious conspiracy or RICO trial against those they are trying to protect, running.
End game. Act III. D5. NCSWIC.
Saying it was a conspiracy isn't new. That's what was being said a year ago.
See, here is a link to an article written a year ago about it being a "joint venture or conspiracy".
https://www.thefreedomtimes.com/2022/04/05/new-durham-filing-reveals-text-message-from-sussman-joint-venture-or-conspiracy-to-smear-trump/
Yes, old news regurgitated to increase clicks and ad revenue.
It‘s updated. Get RIF.
Ok. What exactly was updated in it?
6 up.
What?
Look 6 posts up.
6 posts up from which post? You realize that counts change when people respond to posts, right?
Makes a lot more sense to just say what you mean rather than being cryptic.
So is it the post talking about a light being shown on the case? That doesn't explain what has been updated in the article.
Hillary's campaign pleading guilty to FEC stuff? That happened in 2022.
So not sure what you're talking about, or why you feel the need to make a simple question "What was updated in that article" such a time suck.
I though this one: Now that Hillary’s campaign has pleaded guilty to the FEC for calling RussiaGate “Legal Fees” the campaign is a co-conspirator with Joffre, Sussman, et al.
So, if that is old, my bad. Was a tough day. Wish you a good one.
I think it is, and it was the major revelation. Quite important, really, proving both that he lied and it was Hillary's plot.
Brian Cates on TS is all over this. He states 33m "Yes, for some reason reporter John Solomon, who is protected according Q, along with Sara Carter and a few others, has seen fit to update this story from last year."
and later states that Durham is not finished (in his opinion).
I'm starting to think John Solomon was instructed to post this again by the Q team. I don't know why. Maybe I'm crazy.
It’s a start. 🤷🏼♂️
I actually believe Durham biggest revelations are being timed for after DJT’s return. If you watched Trump’s statement about dismantling the DS, then I think Durham’s findings will be used as leverage to execute Trump’s [the] plan.
@BrianCates
· 2m I have only TWO predictions on Durham I've been publicly saying for 8 months now:
and
We'll see what happens.
Anyone could see he wasnt done with how the Sussman and Danchenko cases were presented. Any unbiased observer could see he was building a conspiracy case down the road. It was more than obvious.
Perhaps this is why we are watching three different possible Trump indictments working at the same time. An effort to head Durham off at the pass. Their problem is they have nothing. NOTHING. All they have is some poorly constructed cases based off lies and egregious malfeasance by the Justice Dept.
And then Durham drops the conspiracy BOMB. If a bombshell headline was ever deserved this is it.
One rabbit hole leads to three more.
This is a year old. Just the news is really lame.
The bombshell here is connecting the parties in conspiracy. Paving the way for what everyone who has been following Durham’s progress has suspected will come next… a massive RICO case against the deep state players.
How is that a new bombshell? Durham was calling a conspiracy a year ago.
https://www.thefreedomtimes.com/2022/04/05/new-durham-filing-reveals-text-message-from-sussman-joint-venture-or-conspiracy-to-smear-trump/
RICO
Ok, how was it not RICO a year ago, when it was first posted?
I don’t recall seeing this a year ago, regardless it feels like it is another palate cleanser before the main course.
So what do you believe has changed since now and then that will make this a RICO case now?
This case being mentioned in this article has already been tried. Sussman was acquitted,btw.
It being considered a conspiracy was pretty well known during the trial. So that's nothing new.
Yeah, this is going to piss people off but here goes;
Do you guys ever bother to pay attention to shit going on?
We have people here who think it's some new bombshell that the Sussman thing was a conspiracy.
Even though it was plastered on news article after news article a year ago
And some person posting here seems to be completely unaware that there was an entire trial involving Sussman (or that he was acquitted).
You people are the reason we all look like idiots to normies when they come checking this place out.
And no wonder! I'm half convinced myself!
Do better. Be better.
I'm going to go put myself in timeout until I'm not absolutely disgusted by stupid people.
yeh all seems old but don't specifically recall the text chain quoted. do you?
this is it copied and pasted:
"Jim – it's Michael Sussmann. I have something time-sensitive (and sensitive) I need to discuss," Sussmann texted Baker on Sept. 18, 2016, according to the new court filing. "Do you have availability for a short meeting tomorrow? I'm coming on my own – not on behalf of a client or company – want to help the Bureau. Thanks."
Yes, I recall that specific text chain quoted, because it was pretty much the entire case against Sussman and can be found on page TWO of what Durham filed back in April of last year.
Click on the OP text above and in the article there's a link to Durham's filing from last year and on page Two, there is that exact text.
so why the heck is JustTheNews posting this article now?? strange for sure. and written by John Solomon who is pretty solid usually
Like I posted above, it's a common tactic for websites such as that to regurgitate old posts to get clicks and ad revenue.
Money. That's why.
The post itself was written a year ago.
All they have to do is "update" it. Which could just mean re-opening the file it's saved under. And then it gets bumped up in newsfeeds and people click on it, thinking it is new and they earn money from that.
It's not uncommon.
When there's an actual update to news articles, the news source will usually make an edit at the bottom telling you what has been changed or added.
The lack of such a thing is why I believe it's just been regurgitated for clicks.
I do recall that some things came out that weren't part of the case or at least the judge didn't allow them to be. perhaps Durham filed a new complaint for matters that weren't tried. I went on Solomons twatter and lots of people saying this is old and no reply yet from John to elucidate, but he just doesn't seem that type to recycle and not have double checked his work
current Solomon tweet: https://twitter.com/jsolomonReports/status/1640399179741642765
old article: https://twitter.com/southerntails1/status/1640460176162451457
🤷♀️
Who knows? They'll probably say it was a glitch or something or they were hacked.
But there is zero info there that is new. Zero. All of it has already been reported on by various sources for over a year. The way back machine shows the article was exactly the same a year ago. There is zero news anywhere else concerning anything new with Durham or Sussman from any where else (that isn't using this as a source).
So......guess someone fucked up. 🤷♀️
Edited to add:
Some Twitter news accounts are automatically set up to send a tweet out whenever that account holder publishes an article.
So maybe someone (interns? Editors?) "accidentally" "updated" or regurgitated that article from last year and it automatically sent out that tweet.
Either way, Anons, who are supposed to be paying attention to this shit, should know that it's not new that it's being called a conspiracy, and should definitely know there was already a trial about it.
it shows as a new story on JustTheNews website I believe. and perusing around last night I came across a story where Jim Jordan (I think) mentions Durham with new charges. something tells me there's more to this than meets the eye
Agreed. We need to stay frosty. Too many people see something that gives them a good feels and updoot it.
We need to prioritize quality instead of feels when we updoot.
Lots of people seem to be confused on what is going on with this article.
It's very simple, I think. Sites like that regularly repost or "update" an article, just to get more views and ad revenue on it.
It's one of the main reasons we constantly see old news recycled on these types of sites. Money.
It must be right. It must be according to the law. It must be proven. It's what you don't see. Durham is not the only game in town.
Conspiracy. AKA RICO.
This is why we aren’t seeing public progress. Why it’s taking forever. Because they don’t start kicking doors in until they are ready for everyone at once.
Think about how wide their net must have spread once they started. It’s never ending. One person bounces to the next bounces to the next. FISA bounce over and over and over.
One day, don’t know when, we are gonna see the largest RICO in history kicked off.
It was being called a conspiracy a year ago.
https://www.thefreedomtimes.com/2022/04/05/new-durham-filing-reveals-text-message-from-sussman-joint-venture-or-conspiracy-to-smear-trump/
May be why the Obama’s fled to Australia hoping they could evade arrest.
What if the election theft was caught via FISA? There must have been communications and planning done electronically. They probably have the records going back decades. Why wouldn’t they have captured all of the planning and comms between the players? The phone calls deciding the water pipe break on election night? The calls coordinating everyone stopping counting in swing states? If course they would have those communications.
So what if Trump calling attention to it and letting us all see it happen is so when the trials start, or we get results of secret fisa courts, people believe it?
If you are going to arrest political opponents for rigging an election, the people have to believe it so it can’t be just called a coup. It has to be obvious in order to prevent civil war. To make the next administration legitimate. It has to have the appearance of righting a wrong, not just arrests out the blue.
This is a regurgitated article from almost a year ago. Nothing is new here and nothing has changed.
Must be time for just 2 more weeeeeeeeeeeeeeeekkkkkkkksssss
The text is old, but maybe the direct accusation of a conspiracy with HRC campaign is new?
IDK at this point there are so many bombshells it doesn't matter. The "bombshell" will be when and if anyone ever does anything about it.
Nope. Seriously, this is like the fifth time in this comment section people are trying to claim that it being called a conspiracy is new.
Durham was calling it a conspiracy a year ago.
I am extremely concerned that Anons, who are supposed to be better informed than the average bear on things like this, either didn't pay much attention to this case as it was happening or are experiencing mass amnesia in certain areas.
https://www.thefreedomtimes.com/2022/04/05/new-durham-filing-reveals-text-message-from-sussman-joint-venture-or-conspiracy-to-smear-trump/
I stand corrected thanks.
Yeah, you seem to have missed that entire trial thingy they had with Sussman.
Long story short, he was acquitted.
JFC, people. Seriously. 🤦♀️
Also, it's 2023 right now. Not 2022. You know, when that was filed.
OFFS. Thought this was something new. Thank you.
u/#durham
RICO
Many people seem to have missed the fact that there are six significant new paragraphs added at the end.
After;
"House Intelligence Committee Republican investigative counsel Kash Patel. "And so it may have been a decision that we came to together. I mean, I don't want to imply that I was sort of directed to do something against my better judgment, or that we were in any sort of conflict."
Where are you getting that is new? Because when I look at the article in the Wayback machine from a year ago, it's the same.
Why would they add this today, when this is exactly what was reported in other news articles a year ago, and is exactly what he did during the trial, which has been over for awhile now?
Here's one of the six new paragraphs. Show me where this, and the other five paragraphs, are in the article from the Wayback link that you posted.
"Patel, who helped unravel the false Russia collusion narrative with former Rep. Devin Nunes, said the new filing by Durham is one of the most significant in the entire investigation to date."
I didn't post a link to the wayback machine before, but here is one. Not sure how to "show you", other than giving a link and having you read it, so.... 🤷♀️
https://web.archive.org/web/20220430054444/https://justthenews.com/accountability/russia-and-ukraine-scandals/durham-bombshell-fbi-text-message-shows-clinton-lawyer
That link was what that article looked like on April 30, 2022. Looks exactly the same to me. So, again.....🤷♀️
Edited to add:
But just to Scooby-Doo this shit, why exactly are you thinking those paragraphs are new?
The link you posted twice, and referenced to in your previous posts;
https://www.thefreedomtimes.com/2022/04/05/new-durham-filing-reveals-text-message-from-sussman-joint-venture-or-conspiracy-to-smear-trump/
Did not include those six paragraphs.
Perhaps the reason for your initial confusion?
That's not the wayback machine, and I never claimed it was the same article.
It's not even the same website.
I was using that to show people that Durham was saying that it was a conspiracy a year ago, because it says it right in the headline.
I can't trust that anyone here will go to all the effort of actually reading the entire article. I have to make it as simple as possible and spoon feed it to people.
But apparently that backfired, seeing as how you didn't even bother to check if it was the same news source, or author, or article, or anything.
🤦♀️
JFC, I really don't know why I even bother sometimes. I really don't.
So, you decided to reference an article where you came to a mistaken conclusion. Now you state that you did that because you 'care'.
That's funny, you're quite adept at covering your mistakes. I will give you credit for that.
Why did I mention '"Wayback" in my previous post?
You're welcome.
WTF are you talking about?
What exactly do you believe was my "mistaken conclusion"?
Yes, I care that the general population believes all Anons are functionally retarded, because they come here and see shit like this.
I mentioned that I checked the Wayback machine and it was the same. I never said I gave a link to it. And it's possible to carry on more than one conversation at once. I can speak of the Wayback Machine in one post, and post a link to something else in another.
You don't even know what the wayback machine is, otherwise you wouldn't have confused a completely 100% different website, that was clearly not the Wayback machine as the Wayback machine.
Goddamn! Seriously! Are you fuckers trying to discredit Q and every other Anon?
Damn, the moustache man is still alive!!!!!!!!!!!!
Guess, heads are going to be a swinging pretty soon
Ooooo, is Durham going to get another acquittal? How exciting!
Nope. It's the same acquittal. Because it's the same article from a year ago.
Not a peep for months. But right when we are getting ready to see an economic collapse and Trump possibly being arrested he comes out of hiding. Timing is everything when you are directing a movie.
Old article updated. Yet nothing new in it.
Was the Nashville Lone Shooter story a smokescreen for this?
You know, with the FF machine cranked up to 11 out of pure despiration, I dont think FFs do much to shift the news cycle these days.
Ive been wondering if some of these shootings have been clean up operations by both sides. Just like I think the train derailments were tactical in nature and involve more strategy than just pushing the news cycle.
Good possibility. But didnt Biden also just announce a gun grab effort too? Maybe both the shooting and Bidens gun grab were timed to drown out the real criminality being exposed.
To u/DireCarbon point I agree hardly anyone is blinking at the Nashville FF incident. They have used it to the point Americans are totally desensitized to it. Kinda like the racism tag.
So now we know how they steal elections.
This person does not exist