It could be both. There’s no indication that she’s lying. BLG didn’t care for the interviewer and the way he worded the questions or omitted the questions we would want to know. But if preplanned, then why was it preplanned? Idk, she seems open about everything so why not ask? It did seem like the obvious questions were omitted. What’s your take?
I'm just cautious of being too hopeful, fren. If something is too good to be true, then maybe it is. I love what she is saying but the fact that she works for a govt special op team doesn't mean she works for the Q team. It could even be the anti Q team. There is no way for her to know & so neither can we know.
Maybe though. It makes sense that the govt hires people like her
Please dont be "hopeful" about any personalities fren. Consider everything all these people say as "raw intel" and use your own analysis to see what is consistent with what we are seeing around us and what is not.
To me, what Halper says is mostly consistent with what we are seeing and explains much, even though she is also missing crucial pieces of info (and she clearly mentioned only 7 people other than Trump know the full info). Adds to her credibility.
i know she got a shout out from DJT (or junior?), have we got any more confirmation on where she's really at? she's hitting all the right redpills but i'm exercising more caution lately.
If she’s so wrong, why isn’t the corporate media using this as an attack vector against President Trump? They could be “debunking” this but instead they are ignoring it.
Good point. And, she knows more about what the plan is with the millions of illegal aliens than she is letting on IMO. Just my own intuition based on her response. She also doesn't think the cities 14 or 16 whatever he said are going to be "lost" to violence and civil unrest. Also just my read.
First off, she is highly intelligent. Several times, the interviewer made a misstatement and she quickly (and kindly) corrected it. Stupid people tend to not notice or correct things the way she did.
Second, even if she were a LARP or Black Hat psyop, the CONCEPT that she is conveying makes sense. If there is a Q Team, and if they are White Hat, and if they want to take down the evil globalist system, then OF COURSE they would be monitoring the thinking of the people, and especially the sheep, to understand what move to make next.
You could not possibly conduct such a mission without extensive intel on what people are thinking. Even low-life politicians have people conducting opinion polls and focus groups to figure out how they can manipulate their language to become frauds by saying things people want to hear.
Q Team would have to keep an eye on the pulse of the thinking out there, on all sides, to gather intel to know what steps to take next.
Globalists would have the same desire, but they are so arrogant in their little bubble world that they might not be so focused on this type of thing. They have been able to force things in the past. A group of people who wanted to do things more cleanly would need to understand the people.
Third, if they were to form a task force for this, she is an excellent candidate to recruit. If her background is the psychology of groups of employees in the business world, as it relates to mergers and acquisitions, she has experience trying to understand HOW people think and WHY they think what they do, and then providing reports of her analysis.
I was skeptical of her TV interview. Had never heard of her and didn't really believe her explanation of why she was saying Q talking points.
But this interview brought a lot of that out, and was very interesting.
Everything you detailed struck me as well as I continue to feel her out.
Side note - but relevant...
The methodology she describes - studying people and all that jazz - to measure/get a temperature reading on where different people groups are...
This is an area that I have been focusing on for the last three years, as understanding the answers to those observation data points helps plot out trajectory and leads to insight on what to do next (speaking purely on a personal level).
So knowing how real and true and useful this methodology has been for myself - and how I have used it to know when and where to Move the Overton Window - in which people groups, etc. AND monitor when others are moving the Overton Window....
She's either very aware of said elements and is just parroting these things... Or she's very aware and what she says about being involved with them (whether simply observing them herself, or being part of a group that feeds these perspectives to other operators) - is true.
Either way - I know she is not full of crap.
And - I can see it in this thread here - there are minds that will see this, and minds that simply can't.
I get it. But that doesn't mean it's wrong or doesn't exist.
So by my own assessment - as someone who operates in the very ways she details - I believe, at least what she is speaking about, as a subject matter - is completely on point.
The rest is left to be shown - but does it even matter, if the concepts and need for said concepts are true and real?
I had Security Clearance at DHS many moons ago. I could tell people I had it, but I couldn't show them any active projects I was working on until they were declassified.
With you here. I’m not jumping on the Dr. Halpern bandwagon yet. Who is she? She says an awful lot of the “right things” I’m public and seems to be enjoying her spotlight. The whole thing kind of stinks
The mention of Charlie Ward certainly does - major fraudster with history of bilking people. He even admits to "bringing underage-uh-I-mean-young girls to meet Jimmy Saville in the 80's" (Saville is a notorious pedo, who moved in the highest circles) and "moving money"
Either he is a liar about that (bad) or he did (also bad). Plus his son is on the record calling him a fraudster (timeshares etc) and generally bad dude. He pretends to be nice etc but the history of deception is there.
Its offhand comment about how do you handle things and she says "this something Charlie Ward has right you just let it go to whatever force you believe in" or something similar to that, as in, let God take the stress something of that sort, in the context of handling pressure.
I did look again jumping around but couldnt find it myself again
Could be worse. She's clearly saying all the right stuff. You know, the things we want to hear but if it is as compartmentalized as she says then there is no that she could even know if the govt psy-op team she gives info to is white hat or black hat
She looks nuttier than a squirrel turd. Just b/c Trump “Re-Truthed” her might also mean he is exposing her. He’s got a long history of exposing folks. She isn’t saying things we haven’t already heard. She was just able to say them on more mainstream outlets & that’s the only reason we have even noticed her. I for one am keeping my distance from this Pelosi doppelgänger.
You can tell people you have a clearance, but you’re taught to be discreet about your job and not disclose any details to people who could have an ulterior motive to find out more about what you do for your job. So no, you won’t be broadcasting that you have a clearance to people that you don’t know. And that’s just basic OPSEC - nothing to do with anything classified.
Foreign actors love to use networking to figure out who they should be contacting to get more information about the programs that they’re interested in.
People in defense industry now have to take hours of training annually now on security. Thanks Hillary - NOT!!
Her endorsement of Charlie Ward essentially means she is larping about, repeating the lurid fantasies of that constellation of fantasists and calling it insider info.
She goes down in my estimation, just a circular-reference repeating speculation as-if it is disclosure.... CAUTION with this one.
However, there is a silver-lining behind it: A thought with enough energy becomes a thing. It is like creating a key to unlock the mind into free-thought.
This is not for us, as if we would need such recommendation. Again, it is easy to read a few Q posts, bring yourself online of a certain position, and blabber on.
Let's now consider the avalanche of things that can open people's minds .... Damn, it has never been this easy.
The signal this gives in and of itself, is an encouraging one.
She says she competed in the 105 lb. category and could lift over 300 lbs in a dead lift, and bench more than her weight, I don't remember the exact numbers
WOW!!!! I bet she was sssssssmmmmooookin hot back in the day. Hell, she’s still hot (my opinion … but all my buddies and even my wifey say I have a chemical imbalance 😂😂😂)
Some tidbits there. Plan A is going well. As of now, I don’t think we will have to go to plan B. She knows more than she is saying, but she knows only a slice of the bigger picture.
So who is “Dr. Halpern”? Where did she come from? Why is she now everywhere? And why should we be listening to her? How do we know she’s not controlled opp?
PDJT retruthing her past interview is the only thing that gave her credibility in my eyes. I’m still skeptical of everyone, personally. I’m guessing that she is now “playing her role” in this. It seems like each time someone pops up into the news for awhile, does what they are supposed to do and then just as quick, they are gone from the news.
One is that the situation in Maui would seem to lend itself to being a catalyst for the military to assume control of the country. Between the lack of warning sirens, water being turned off, anomalies in fire behavior, residents being corralled in their cars into a kill zone, the background of the police chief, the obvious insanity of the guy in charge of the water, the children (allegedly) being sent home from the school, the lack of communications, the aid being done by other islanders in boats, etc - but most of all the missing children and missing adults…. It would seem an opportune time to assume control of Hawaii and shortly thereafter, after disclosing some particularly damning information from their preliminary investigation - including rescuing any kidnapped/trafficked individuals (of any age), assuming control of the country, arrests, disclosures, etc.
Second, I’m sure at least some of the people in the group she’s in monitoring social media are monitoring the comments section of FNM and other media as well. I’ve spent a lot of time in the past reading thousands of comments on “controversial” media articles and there are definitely ebbs and flows of rabid leftist commentary. Some of it, you can tell, is from non English-speaking people, some is meant to distract, others to obfuscate the truth, some work in tandem with other shills, some just comment to infuriate conservatives. You can see even here at GAW if you watch the mod logs. Recently there seems to be an uptick of them, but it’s nothing like the amount 6 months to a year before the 2020 elections.
I’m wondering if the people making the decisions on what steps to take next, timing, etc, aren’t more interested in ensuring that the swamp dredging is thorough vs whether or not the sad little Potatus supporters can handle reality (they can’t and they don’t want to). The small and dwindling number of violent leftists (remember during the St. Floyd riots they had to ship the barbaric thugs from state-to-state?) aren’t going to be enough for widespread civil war and I’d assume that most of the soyboy beta males and virtue-signaling liberal women that comprise the majority of the left aren’t going to take up arms and do battle.
The illegal invaders pouring over our borders are certainly a concern and I’m guessing there are strong pockets of them, particularly in large leftist-controlled cities. They’ll use some of the useful idiots of the left as human shields when things heat up by camouflaging themselves as protestors in the crowd until they split off and start the hardcore violence, arson, etc, the timing of that being up to their DS puppet masters.
It’s my gut feeling perhaps that the WH decision makers are ensuring that they dredge out as many really bad characters as possible, decimating the ranks of the beasts, so that this evil is quashed for a thousand years. We’ve got front row seats to just how emboldened some of the DS’ minor players have become, the teachers, judges, pols, etc. in less than three years. Anyway, these are just a couple thoughts I had from listening to this session.
One of the things that jumped out to me in this show was her claim that the DoD is exploring ways to get these ideas out in more of a main stream media fashion, hence her appearing on the morning British show talking about these things. Admittedly this is going to be a challenge for the patriot / Q team to pull off. If these claims she makes are true, I think the white hats need to make major plays of getting these ideas out in main stream news. The fake news has done an outstanding job at discrediting these types of topics as alt right q-anon conspiracy theory. If the public can start to latch onto these ideas I'd say that is a real huge step forward and it sounds like they might've been testing the waters with her to see what type of reaction the public would emit regarding her appearance on the British news. But at the end of the day, maybe it doesn't matter, if this is all going to escalate to an overt takeover by the US military when we reach that boiling point, then maybe getting control of MSM isn't as big a deal as we might think it is. Ultimately if/when SHTF it's going to be pretty startling, even for us in this community, but we'll have seen it coming at least.
Leave them an out. A cornered dog fights to the death so they have to be able to save face.
When prosecuting the Black Hats there needs to be a focus on their MANIPULATION. They were victims. (After 2-3 years, then you can hammer them with reminders of what they did to the unvaccinated.)
We were/are all effectively under varying levels of mind control. Lets all bond together while watching the abusers be held accountable in a court of law.
Then we need time to heal. I'm not sure how this is done and everyone still works but I would tell the world they need to keep working but there will be WEEKLY updates, changes, adaptions, monetary easing etc....
If we have each other, we can get through this, no problem. Communities ALWAYS COME TOGETHER.
Just curious if someone on a government task force would be able to speak so openly about what the task force is doing in respect to psyops and national sentiment toward Biden. And if she is privy to knowing that the military will step in, why would she be permitted to state that?
She claimed they knew she was talking to the media about what she does. For all we know, THAT is part of the op. She would deny it either way.
As for when the military steps in, she said that she knew nothing (well, that it was another part of the op she was not privy to) about that side of it and it was just her personal opinion.
So Trump re-truthed her. Why? To help the other side? To throw us off? To communicate to us that she's credible or what what she said in the tv interview is?
She said that Trump would be sharing a lot during his press conference on Monday. This was aired 3 days ago. Was it this past Monday or was it supposed to be the press conference that was canceled?
I keep thinking that the "military" in "The military is the only way" actually refers to those who were forced out for not taking the vax and who will eventually group together with other patriots to help take back our government.
There is nothing special about the hundreds that quit during that compared to the thousands that quit in the last decade or two as it became obvious what all this was leading to
Jan thinks that liberals do not think foir themselves. I have to agree! I have seen comments and messages on many sites where people have just poured out their thoughts on a subjects and done the same for a different subject later on but the two ideas are not compatible! It does my head in.
She looks to be telling the truth
She's great. Let's hope she is right.
The "knight running" scene from Monty Python's Holy Grail is similiar to how this is all panning out. https://youtu.be/XslcgQJMZaY
And the best part of this is when he sees the flower vase and whacks it as well, kek
The vase had it coming.
🤣 I needed that! Legendary!
Body Language Ghost believes so too: https://youtu.be/ZnC-M6yDngM
mixed message: Says she's honest & at the end says doesn't like this interview / seems prepared
so is it honest or preplanned?
It could be both. There’s no indication that she’s lying. BLG didn’t care for the interviewer and the way he worded the questions or omitted the questions we would want to know. But if preplanned, then why was it preplanned? Idk, she seems open about everything so why not ask? It did seem like the obvious questions were omitted. What’s your take?
I'm just cautious of being too hopeful, fren. If something is too good to be true, then maybe it is. I love what she is saying but the fact that she works for a govt special op team doesn't mean she works for the Q team. It could even be the anti Q team. There is no way for her to know & so neither can we know.
Maybe though. It makes sense that the govt hires people like her
Please dont be "hopeful" about any personalities fren. Consider everything all these people say as "raw intel" and use your own analysis to see what is consistent with what we are seeing around us and what is not.
To me, what Halper says is mostly consistent with what we are seeing and explains much, even though she is also missing crucial pieces of info (and she clearly mentioned only 7 people other than Trump know the full info). Adds to her credibility.
Sounds grifty to me though, things that she says aren't adding up in my head and we've been led astray too many times before.
Like..........
So what things dont add up in your head?
What are your thoughts
i know she got a shout out from DJT (or junior?), have we got any more confirmation on where she's really at? she's hitting all the right redpills but i'm exercising more caution lately.
She's a bit on the nose, right?
However Trump did retruth her.
And yes, he could be pointing out one specific item she discussed in that first video.
However, Trump doesn't do anything like that. If he disagreed with anything she said in the video he would have stated so.
Something akin to "Not sure about the rest, but what Jan says about dod and space force having the election data is correct!"
If she’s so wrong, why isn’t the corporate media using this as an attack vector against President Trump? They could be “debunking” this but instead they are ignoring it.
The silence speaks
More like screams!
Good point. And, she knows more about what the plan is with the millions of illegal aliens than she is letting on IMO. Just my own intuition based on her response. She also doesn't think the cities 14 or 16 whatever he said are going to be "lost" to violence and civil unrest. Also just my read.
^^^^ dead solid perfect analysis^^^^
Yeah, this lady seems super-sus...
*It doesn't help that she only pops up on random, larpy podcasts.
**If she was talking with Kash Patel or Gen Flynn, she'd have some credibility...
And Trump retruthed AND commented on her previous interview, where she said nearly the same things?
And if Flynn retruthed that?
u/#wildwest
Thanks, fren!
WWG1WGA!
(For the record, your down doot is not from me. I appreciate tough questions.)
From both of them... POTUS & Don Jr
First off, she is highly intelligent. Several times, the interviewer made a misstatement and she quickly (and kindly) corrected it. Stupid people tend to not notice or correct things the way she did.
Second, even if she were a LARP or Black Hat psyop, the CONCEPT that she is conveying makes sense. If there is a Q Team, and if they are White Hat, and if they want to take down the evil globalist system, then OF COURSE they would be monitoring the thinking of the people, and especially the sheep, to understand what move to make next.
You could not possibly conduct such a mission without extensive intel on what people are thinking. Even low-life politicians have people conducting opinion polls and focus groups to figure out how they can manipulate their language to become frauds by saying things people want to hear.
Q Team would have to keep an eye on the pulse of the thinking out there, on all sides, to gather intel to know what steps to take next.
Globalists would have the same desire, but they are so arrogant in their little bubble world that they might not be so focused on this type of thing. They have been able to force things in the past. A group of people who wanted to do things more cleanly would need to understand the people.
Third, if they were to form a task force for this, she is an excellent candidate to recruit. If her background is the psychology of groups of employees in the business world, as it relates to mergers and acquisitions, she has experience trying to understand HOW people think and WHY they think what they do, and then providing reports of her analysis.
I was skeptical of her TV interview. Had never heard of her and didn't really believe her explanation of why she was saying Q talking points.
But this interview brought a lot of that out, and was very interesting.
Thanks, OP, for posting!
Also ...
Just noticed that behind her, on a table, is a painting of the Columbia Pictures woman statue logo.
"You are watching a movie."
Hmm ...
That stood out to me too. Odd picture to just have hanging out in your house. Definitely intentional.
Everything you detailed struck me as well as I continue to feel her out.
Side note - but relevant...
The methodology she describes - studying people and all that jazz - to measure/get a temperature reading on where different people groups are...
This is an area that I have been focusing on for the last three years, as understanding the answers to those observation data points helps plot out trajectory and leads to insight on what to do next (speaking purely on a personal level).
So knowing how real and true and useful this methodology has been for myself - and how I have used it to know when and where to Move the Overton Window - in which people groups, etc. AND monitor when others are moving the Overton Window....
She's either very aware of said elements and is just parroting these things... Or she's very aware and what she says about being involved with them (whether simply observing them herself, or being part of a group that feeds these perspectives to other operators) - is true.
Either way - I know she is not full of crap.
And - I can see it in this thread here - there are minds that will see this, and minds that simply can't.
I get it. But that doesn't mean it's wrong or doesn't exist.
So by my own assessment - as someone who operates in the very ways she details - I believe, at least what she is speaking about, as a subject matter - is completely on point.
The rest is left to be shown - but does it even matter, if the concepts and need for said concepts are true and real?
No prob👍🏻
Many of these mistakes bolstered her points but she still had the integrity to correct them.
Good stuff!
Is she implying she has a security clearance? Isn't part of having a security clearance not saying or implying you have a security clearance?
She touches on 1871 and 80/20, 7 people with all the information. He brings up illegals infiltrating as sleeper cells, Chinese meth labs.
What name did she call Harris? I couldn't make it out.
No, the fact that one possesses a clearance is not classified
Source: held Top Secret Code Word clearance in USAF
Oh so it's safe to tell us the word now? /s
The word is "pepe".
lol, Who is the sissy who downvoted a flippant joke?
Some people are touchy.
whats that for? launching nukes or something?
Nope, spying on the Russians
I had Security Clearance at DHS many moons ago. I could tell people I had it, but I couldn't show them any active projects I was working on until they were declassified.
With you here. I’m not jumping on the Dr. Halpern bandwagon yet. Who is she? She says an awful lot of the “right things” I’m public and seems to be enjoying her spotlight. The whole thing kind of stinks
I agree, she says she listens to this guy and And We Know every day, so it makes me think she is only repeating what they say.
....and Trump is only repeating her repeating what they say for shits and giggles because reasons.
Does it smell like grift ?
The mention of Charlie Ward certainly does - major fraudster with history of bilking people. He even admits to "bringing underage-uh-I-mean-young girls to meet Jimmy Saville in the 80's" (Saville is a notorious pedo, who moved in the highest circles) and "moving money"
Either he is a liar about that (bad) or he did (also bad). Plus his son is on the record calling him a fraudster (timeshares etc) and generally bad dude. He pretends to be nice etc but the history of deception is there.
Just finished listening to the whole vid - Where did they mention Charlie Ward? I was listening for it, but did not hear it.
Its offhand comment about how do you handle things and she says "this something Charlie Ward has right you just let it go to whatever force you believe in" or something similar to that, as in, let God take the stress something of that sort, in the context of handling pressure.
I did look again jumping around but couldnt find it myself again
Could be worse. She's clearly saying all the right stuff. You know, the things we want to hear but if it is as compartmentalized as she says then there is no that she could even know if the govt psy-op team she gives info to is white hat or black hat
She looks nuttier than a squirrel turd. Just b/c Trump “Re-Truthed” her might also mean he is exposing her. He’s got a long history of exposing folks. She isn’t saying things we haven’t already heard. She was just able to say them on more mainstream outlets & that’s the only reason we have even noticed her. I for one am keeping my distance from this Pelosi doppelgänger.
Pelosi doppelgänger?!! Now that does give me pause... she would make a decent stand-in for Pelosi in a sting operation, it's plausible.
💯
I read that she was on Trump's transition team.
Giggle-puss. (29:09)
Had to listen to it a few times, at .5, .25 and the one that was the clearest .75 with watching Dr Jan’s mouth as she was speaking.
You can tell people you have a clearance, but you’re taught to be discreet about your job and not disclose any details to people who could have an ulterior motive to find out more about what you do for your job. So no, you won’t be broadcasting that you have a clearance to people that you don’t know. And that’s just basic OPSEC - nothing to do with anything classified.
Foreign actors love to use networking to figure out who they should be contacting to get more information about the programs that they’re interested in.
People in defense industry now have to take hours of training annually now on security. Thanks Hillary - NOT!!
Now we know that Dr Jan follows anons
She's here right now
If she starts linking this to an upcoming book or tour then I'm out
EXTREMELY IMPT.
Her endorsement of Charlie Ward essentially means she is larping about, repeating the lurid fantasies of that constellation of fantasists and calling it insider info. She goes down in my estimation, just a circular-reference repeating speculation as-if it is disclosure.... CAUTION with this one.
Yes!
However, there is a silver-lining behind it: A thought with enough energy becomes a thing. It is like creating a key to unlock the mind into free-thought.
This is not for us, as if we would need such recommendation. Again, it is easy to read a few Q posts, bring yourself online of a certain position, and blabber on.
Let's now consider the avalanche of things that can open people's minds .... Damn, it has never been this easy.
The signal this gives in and of itself, is an encouraging one.
Wouldn't have guessed she was a state champion powerlifter
GTFO ... is that true??? she is so petite! oh well, you know what they say about dynamite and packaging. 😂
She says she competed in the 105 lb. category and could lift over 300 lbs in a dead lift, and bench more than her weight, I don't remember the exact numbers
Dead-lifted 358, squatted 308, bench-pressed 165. @2:05
That's insane
She's minute
Powerful little lady, that’s for sure.
WOW!!!! I bet she was sssssssmmmmooookin hot back in the day. Hell, she’s still hot (my opinion … but all my buddies and even my wifey say I have a chemical imbalance 😂😂😂)
Some tidbits there. Plan A is going well. As of now, I don’t think we will have to go to plan B. She knows more than she is saying, but she knows only a slice of the bigger picture.
I sure hope what happened in Lahaina wasn't a part of their plans.
Why didn't he ask her about that?!? Unless the interview happened before the fire. It's the only thing not computing in my brain yet...
And she is being allowed to talk about it. Why is that?
Because WH's are speeding up the flow of info and she worked with POTUS so she has earned a position of trust
Only Anons and the DS are paying attention. Hint to Anons and warning to the DS.
So who is “Dr. Halpern”? Where did she come from? Why is she now everywhere? And why should we be listening to her? How do we know she’s not controlled opp?
PDJT retruthing her past interview is the only thing that gave her credibility in my eyes. I’m still skeptical of everyone, personally. I’m guessing that she is now “playing her role” in this. It seems like each time someone pops up into the news for awhile, does what they are supposed to do and then just as quick, they are gone from the news.
Gen Flynn also retruthed Trump's retruth.
https://youtu.be/ZnC-M6yDngM
Body Language Ghost's take...
awesome video. thank you for sharing!!!
makes no sense
A couple thoughts —
One is that the situation in Maui would seem to lend itself to being a catalyst for the military to assume control of the country. Between the lack of warning sirens, water being turned off, anomalies in fire behavior, residents being corralled in their cars into a kill zone, the background of the police chief, the obvious insanity of the guy in charge of the water, the children (allegedly) being sent home from the school, the lack of communications, the aid being done by other islanders in boats, etc - but most of all the missing children and missing adults…. It would seem an opportune time to assume control of Hawaii and shortly thereafter, after disclosing some particularly damning information from their preliminary investigation - including rescuing any kidnapped/trafficked individuals (of any age), assuming control of the country, arrests, disclosures, etc.
Second, I’m sure at least some of the people in the group she’s in monitoring social media are monitoring the comments section of FNM and other media as well. I’ve spent a lot of time in the past reading thousands of comments on “controversial” media articles and there are definitely ebbs and flows of rabid leftist commentary. Some of it, you can tell, is from non English-speaking people, some is meant to distract, others to obfuscate the truth, some work in tandem with other shills, some just comment to infuriate conservatives. You can see even here at GAW if you watch the mod logs. Recently there seems to be an uptick of them, but it’s nothing like the amount 6 months to a year before the 2020 elections.
I’m wondering if the people making the decisions on what steps to take next, timing, etc, aren’t more interested in ensuring that the swamp dredging is thorough vs whether or not the sad little Potatus supporters can handle reality (they can’t and they don’t want to). The small and dwindling number of violent leftists (remember during the St. Floyd riots they had to ship the barbaric thugs from state-to-state?) aren’t going to be enough for widespread civil war and I’d assume that most of the soyboy beta males and virtue-signaling liberal women that comprise the majority of the left aren’t going to take up arms and do battle.
The illegal invaders pouring over our borders are certainly a concern and I’m guessing there are strong pockets of them, particularly in large leftist-controlled cities. They’ll use some of the useful idiots of the left as human shields when things heat up by camouflaging themselves as protestors in the crowd until they split off and start the hardcore violence, arson, etc, the timing of that being up to their DS puppet masters.
It’s my gut feeling perhaps that the WH decision makers are ensuring that they dredge out as many really bad characters as possible, decimating the ranks of the beasts, so that this evil is quashed for a thousand years. We’ve got front row seats to just how emboldened some of the DS’ minor players have become, the teachers, judges, pols, etc. in less than three years. Anyway, these are just a couple thoughts I had from listening to this session.
I'm enjoying her contributions lately.
She seems like some kind of soft disclosure agent...
Bombards Body Language video out on this https://youtu.be/ZnC-M6yDngM
Ill say David did a good job pretending to try to get the details on her DoD taskforce claim but not actually asking the right questions
are we being led on?
Interesting painting in the background: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-12139531/The-truth-Columbia-Pictures-Torch-Lady-revealed.html
One of the things that jumped out to me in this show was her claim that the DoD is exploring ways to get these ideas out in more of a main stream media fashion, hence her appearing on the morning British show talking about these things. Admittedly this is going to be a challenge for the patriot / Q team to pull off. If these claims she makes are true, I think the white hats need to make major plays of getting these ideas out in main stream news. The fake news has done an outstanding job at discrediting these types of topics as alt right q-anon conspiracy theory. If the public can start to latch onto these ideas I'd say that is a real huge step forward and it sounds like they might've been testing the waters with her to see what type of reaction the public would emit regarding her appearance on the British news. But at the end of the day, maybe it doesn't matter, if this is all going to escalate to an overt takeover by the US military when we reach that boiling point, then maybe getting control of MSM isn't as big a deal as we might think it is. Ultimately if/when SHTF it's going to be pretty startling, even for us in this community, but we'll have seen it coming at least.
How to wake up the Liberal?
Leave them an out. A cornered dog fights to the death so they have to be able to save face.
When prosecuting the Black Hats there needs to be a focus on their MANIPULATION. They were victims. (After 2-3 years, then you can hammer them with reminders of what they did to the unvaccinated.)
We were/are all effectively under varying levels of mind control. Lets all bond together while watching the abusers be held accountable in a court of law.
Then we need time to heal. I'm not sure how this is done and everyone still works but I would tell the world they need to keep working but there will be WEEKLY updates, changes, adaptions, monetary easing etc....
If we have each other, we can get through this, no problem. Communities ALWAYS COME TOGETHER.
We are human after all.
WWG1WGA
There’s 12 of them…so where are the other 11? Are we already listening to a few? Gen. Flynn?
Just curious if someone on a government task force would be able to speak so openly about what the task force is doing in respect to psyops and national sentiment toward Biden. And if she is privy to knowing that the military will step in, why would she be permitted to state that?
She claimed they knew she was talking to the media about what she does. For all we know, THAT is part of the op. She would deny it either way.
As for when the military steps in, she said that she knew nothing (well, that it was another part of the op she was not privy to) about that side of it and it was just her personal opinion.
So Trump re-truthed her. Why? To help the other side? To throw us off? To communicate to us that she's credible or what what she said in the tv interview is?
Hopefully the military is on the patriots side and not the demonic side.
She said that Trump would be sharing a lot during his press conference on Monday. This was aired 3 days ago. Was it this past Monday or was it supposed to be the press conference that was canceled?
She just freaking said she is on a DOD government task force monitoring the internet for the Awakening (!!!!!)
I keep thinking that the "military" in "The military is the only way" actually refers to those who were forced out for not taking the vax and who will eventually group together with other patriots to help take back our government.
Maybe it means that military.
There is nothing special about the hundreds that quit during that compared to the thousands that quit in the last decade or two as it became obvious what all this was leading to
Jan thinks that liberals do not think foir themselves. I have to agree! I have seen comments and messages on many sites where people have just poured out their thoughts on a subjects and done the same for a different subject later on but the two ideas are not compatible! It does my head in.