What if oil is not a fossil fuel? There is a hypothesis that hydrocarbons are produced inside a planet's mantle.
https://postcanadian.com/ambiogenic-petroleum-fossil-fuels-science/
There is a little known scientific hypothesis that challenges our conventional wisdom about oil and gas. The abiogenic petroleum origin hypothesis proposes that petroleum was formed from deep carbon deposits, rather than from the decomposition of organic matter. ...
... If the abiogenic petroleum origin hypothesis were true, it would imply that petroleum resources like oil are not finite or derived from ancient biological matter, but instead are continuously generated through geochemical processes deep within the Earth's mantle and crust. This would have several implications for the abundance of oil and natural gas on Earth. ...
Article lists names of a few geologists and professors who have been bandying the hypothesis about. It notes that that "peak oil theory" has been used to drive up prices and I would add, of course, that it is another driver (a non-environmentally-linked one) for Net Zero nonsense.
Mind you, even if the earth could produce petroleum indefinitely, we may still be limited in our use of it somewhat depending on how fast petroleum percolates up through the rock into the voids from which we draw it out; we may be drawing it up faster than it can re-form even if this theory is true.
It might be worthwhile to revisite the oldest (and presumaby empty) oil wells and see if they are re-filling at all--these date from the mid-1800s https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Oil_Well
At any rate, it's interesting and worth exploring as it adds another bit of intrigue to the whole de-carbonization movement.
Crude oil is a naturally reoccurring resource. The fossil fuel myth was started by John D. Rockefeller.
THE Same John D. Rockefeller who in 1905 re-wrote the medical book that EXCLUDED NATURAL things and put in what is still being practiced today...
What book would that be? is Rockefeller actually listed as the author - or did he fund the book? Cause I seriously doubt a medical text written by an Oil man would be given much credit.
Look into the basis of modern day pharmaceuticals
Turn of expression. "re-wrote the book" very rarely refers to an actual writing of a book.
On that note:
How Big Oil Conquered the World
Enceladus is covered in frozen hydrocarbons. That either means it had abundant life at one point (confirming life in space) or hydrocarbons occur naturally. Ironically it's a moon of the Satan worshiper's favorite planet of Saturn
And the moon iepatus looks like the death star
I just want to mention that Satan worshipers can like Saturn all they like, but God still created it. That is all.
Some wells are reported to fill back up. It's probably true; a self-lubricating living planet. It's going to need a little grease to keep the crust from fracturing and things like that, right? Might as well make it itself.
Yup, oil isn't made of dead dinosaurs and plants. It's created as part of a natural process within the earth. There is no such thing as peak oil.
Just ask the tards how many dinosaurs it takes to create enough oil to fill the permean basin and how did those billions of dinosaurs end up a mile under ground.
The dinosaur theory is a bit of an exaggeration. In reality, geologists theorize that plant and dead animal and microorganisms sediments of both kept covering the bottoms of ancient seas for tens or hundreds of millions of years, compacting and interlaced with inorganic sediments that all became rock (sandstones or carbonates) and were further buried with plate tectonics and folding submerging the layers.
That is not to say that the inorganic theory is not the correct one. Just don't attribute it all to T-Rex.
The latest research shows that all of the chemicals needed to produce oil are not created via the breakdown of the plant and animal material so the creation of oil has to be a byproduct of processes occurring within the earth.
I donāt disagree but sharing such research would be the right way to present your claim.
Yupp! The term fossil fuel was coined to insinuate that its scarce when it is not.
From EAST TEXAS, born & raised, and I can tell you that the drillers cap a well and wait a period of time in years or so and come back and uncap it...THERE'S OIL IN THAT THERE WELL!!!!!!!!!
OIL is a RENEWABLE resource...besides, this country sits on more oil than Saudi Arabia!!!!...'NOUGH SAID!!!!
The Bandy tract has been had, though. Draaaaainage, my boy.
This has been known for some time now, it's called the "Abiotic Theory" of petroleum. The theory goes that petroleum is created in the Earth's mantle as a result of interactions at great depths with the molten magma of the Earth's core. The term "fossil fuels" was created in the early 1900s to sell people on the idea that organic material creates petroleum, but that process has never been replicated or fully explained.
Dated a rig worker once, he told me this was true and peak oil is a scam. Wells refill.
š¤
Yes. This is why you see wells all over the country capped one year and the next will have a pump on it....OR a pump on it but motionless then one day it begins pumping. People dont understand what's right before them that's been going on since oil was discovered.
Yes they do. They know. Peak oil is a psyop.
What if? That's been laid to rest at least a decade ago. Oil is not a fossil fuel.
abiotic oil......
IMO ---- this is why they are pushing
global cooling global warmingclimate change now ----- instead of peak oil.A couple books on the subject -
https://www.amazon.com/Deep-Hot-Biosphere-Fossil-Fuels/dp/0387985468
https://www.amazon.com/Great-Oil-Conspiracy-Government-Discovery/dp/1620871629
and a prior post about the topic -
https://www.amazon.com/Deep-Hot-Biosphere-Fossil-Fuels/dp/0387985468
Or in language easier to understand for the woke and green party people:
Oil is renewable energy.
Rockefeller created the term "fossil fuel" when he owned Standard Oil so he could justify raising prices. It's TOTALLY made up.
Oil is NOT a fossil fuel. I used to work as a quality management systems auditor (ISO 9001 standard). I was auditing a major, world-wide offshore drilling company. I was interviewing one of the drilling engineers. I had heard the stories about wells reservoirs filling back up after many years. He confirmed that fact. I then asked him about oil being a "fossil fuel". He indicated that oil is created within the earth - a natural process.
Yes they do. I worked for a company that supplies the oil companies. They all have long-term calendars for exactly when they will return to existing wells and plan their budgets and forecasts accordingly.
I think itās slow but depends on the earth down there.
Yeah, as soon as I head the whole "fossil fuel" label was a marketing ploy - it all started making a lot more sense that oil is produced by the planet all by itself.
Which would make our world a spectularly bountiful place - and it fits with the ongoing lies about "Peak Oil" no matter how doomy and gloomy - there's always more and bigger and vaster oil fields being discovered.
Imagine a world where oil was understood to be in infinite supply - what could humanity achieve if freed from the Khazarian yoke?
I remember the whole "peak oil" thing. I think the term was popularized by Pres. Jimmie Carter. I also remember that in the early 70's (I was in college) you couldn't fill up your tank everyday. It went by the last number of your license plate being an odd or even number. Of course I believed the company line (i.e. BS) back then.
Of course it's abiotic. How the hell do you think there are lakes of ethane and methane the size of Lake Superior on Saturn's moon Titan? Moon dinos?
Here we go again.
Look, there are only 3 possibilities:
Of these, we can rule out #3. If oil could be replenished by any mechanism at even a tiny fraction of the rate we use it, then this process would have covered the earth in oil millenia ago. The planet would literally have been an ocean of oil long before we decided it was a useful thing. We have at least 12,000 years of recorded history. Somebody during that period would have noted oceans of oil pooling on the surface because it was being forced under pressure out of the rocks. Don't believe nonsense just because you want it to be true.
So the only reasonable options are 1 and 2. Either way, it means we are using oil at a far, far greater rate than it is being created. It will take hundreds of thousands of years to make enough to replace what we have extracted.
Once you realize this, you also realize it doesn't matter how it is created. Only that the creation is so slow that it will soon reach a point that take a barrel of oil to extract a barrel of oil from the ground, and after that point, it will no longer be usable as an energy source.
Nuclear baby! It's the only practical option.
We have burning oil for eons...how high would the dead dinosaurs have to be stacked to form oil beds? The very notion that the "experts" sold adults on "fossil fuels" is the most amazing bit of propaganda ever...I knew as a child that it was a ridiculous notion, just by using The Power Of Imagination...
We ran out in the 70ās. Oil crisis and all.
Remember, we were also headed into the next ice age....w/ no oil. So we were all for sure going to die. Evidently we were lucky to survive it all. I was a teenager, it was stupid then, even stupider now.
Some research from Australia: a PDF.
https://static1.squarespace.com/static/63735cd7ea1d630935b81b96/t/6374b17e9c89187c0efddc00/1668592039147/Bendall+et+al+2015+APPEA+paper_MW.pdf
It has been proven that oil is produced from calcium carbonate and iron oxide. Heat and pressure causes oil to be produces from compounds.
We all grew up believing that oil is a fossil fuel, and just about every day this āfactā is mentioned in newspapers and on TV. However, let us not forget what Lenin said ā āA lie told often enough becomes truth.ā
The great French chemist Marcellin Berthelot particularly scorned the hypothesis of a biological origin for petroleum. Berthelot first carried out experiments involving, among others, a series of what are now referred to as Kolbe reactions and demonstrated the generation of petroleum by dissolving steel in strong acid. He produced the suite of n-alkanes and made it plain that such were generated in total absence of any ābiologicalā molecule or process. Berthelotās investigations were later extended and refined by other scientists, including Biasson and Sokolov, all of whom observed similar phenomena and likewise concluded that petroleum was unconnected to biological matter.
In 1951, the modern Russian-Ukrainian theory of deep, abiotic petroleum origins was first enunciated by Nikolai A. Kudryavtsev at the All-Union petroleum geology congress. Kudryavtsev analyzed the hypothesis of a biological origin of petroleum, and pointed out the failures of the claims then commonly put forth to support that hypothesis.
Scientists and engineers found that oil is not a āfossil fuelā but is a natural product of planet Earth ā the high-temperature, high-pressure continuous reaction between calcium carbonate and iron oxide ā two of the most abundant compounds making up the Earthās crust.
A team consisting of Russian scientists and Dr J. F. Kenney, of Gas Resources Corporation, Houston, USA, have actually built a reactor vessel and proven that oil is produced from calcium carbonate and iron oxide.
Needless to say, the last people to tell us the truth about oil will be the oil producers and oil companies, for they of course have a vested interest in perpetuating the myth that oil is a fossil fuel and that it will soon be exhausted, in order to ratchet up the price for as long as they can. And donāt look to the Russians to enlighten the world with the truth about oil either, for they are surely laughing now that as oil price continue to increase.
Where I grew up, they use to seal gas/oil wells because in 30-40 years the wells would fill up again.
Oil is definitely not a fossil fuel. That's just a marketing name to create artificial scarcity. The Earth creates oil. Here's geologist Colonel L. Fletcher Prouty talking about "Peak Oil". https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hu_R3gp84TY&ab_channel=beckderm
We are lied to about everything- the planet also creates water, called Primary Water. Here's an hour on Primary Water with its pioneer, Dr. Stephan Riess. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r3_HUTvPmDk&ab_channel=calfotogal
The crazier thing is that dinosaurs did not exist either.
The source below is a summation of the sources of fossils, who controls them, and the timeline of the idea of dinosaurs. Don't take my word for it- don't take anyone's word for anything, verify yourself. The biggest red flag is that only Paleontologists find dinosaurs. Not construction workers, not petroleum engineers, not geologists, not normal people digging holes all over the planet for millennia- ONLY PALEONTOLOGISTS FIND DINOSAURS, and only since their existence was theorized AFTER Darwin's theory of evolution.
It's just another hoax from the Father of Lies to try and convince us that we are not Sons and Daughters of God.
http://www.atlanteanconspiracy.com/2015/09/dinosaur-hoax-dinosaurs-never-existed.html
Sorry, not true. The first dinosaur skeleton of an ichthyosaur was discovered in 1836 by Mary Anning (she sells sea shells along the sea shore) in Lyme Regis UK.
Darwins theory of evolution was published in 1859 and anyone can find fossils galore on the Jurassic coast nr Lyme Regis. Just walk along the beach and they are everywhere.
Every other thing that is considered a 'fossil" exists in the"solid" phase.
I.e., The petrified forest, ammonites, Dinosaur bones....
There are no liquid or gaseous phase fossils. Period
Coal is made from organic material. Oil is made In The chemistry lab of the earth.
Our memories are stored in hydrophobic pockets in our microtubules, they have a coherent structure made up of inorganic matter, ie, hydrocarbons.
Source: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33232193/
Probably why we will never get self referencing AI, how can you copy this electronically?
Popular theory, and probably part-true. Large beds of organic matter probably HAVE created oil over the eons, and perhaps lipids within the mantle (from the formation of the earth . . . just as much of Earth's water was here from the beginning; it's not just rock that coalesces into the planets).
Either way, the fact is that oil fields DEPLETE; some may fill partly back up but to the extent that the Earth "makes it's own oil", the process isn't happening in "human time." Thousands and millions of years are involved, and I haven't seen any evidence that major oil fields are coming back online after having been depleted . . . although newer and more expensive extraction methods become viable as the price of oil rises. In the end, when it takes more than a barrel's worth of ENERGY to extract a barrel of oil, the field is no longer viable.
And shale oil fields, in particular, go dry VERY quickly. I'm not convinced we aren't headed for an increasing shortage of oil, although probably not in the next few years . . . and the Cabal's depopulation scheme IS causing demand destruction. Dead people don't use much gasoline.
I can't believe that people fell for the FOSSIL fuel BS. If it was made from dead dinosaurs, it would've ran out a hundred years ago.
Imagine if oil was being produced inside the earth's crust right now, as we speak... it would almost make oil cheap as water would it not?
The attack on oil (and coal) has nothing to do with scarcity. It is all demonization of carbon dioxide (which we all exhale, and enjoy as carbonated beverages).
The abiogenic theories (there are several, depending on the chemistry proposed) are very interesting, but it is pretty clear that coal is a "fossil" fuel, since the plant origins can be detected in its structure. And it is a perfectly good fuel. One might argue that it is proper to restore terrestrial carbon to the atmosphere from which it originated.
You can find plenty of plant fossils in coal.
So, I've been thinking about this and it has some pretty big implications about carbon emissions.
Oil being a fossil fuel presumes that all of the carbon in oil was, at one point, out in the atmosphere and was part of the natural cycle of the world. Meaning that once the oil ran out, the carbon in the atmosphere would be at the maximum of Earth's origin. We couldn't actually make the earth uninhabitable due to the 'water vapor feedback loop' they claim extra carbon in the atmosphere would cause.
However, this flips on its head if oil is produced deep in the earth's crust and has nothing to do with the carbon cycle of life on the surface. Burning the oil puts the carbon in the atmosphere, and we could eventually exceed what the planet could deal with on its own, as the climate alarmists fear, making them CORRECT in that we should be putting our focus on making sustainable energy sources. The irony being that while we aren't likely to ever fully run out of oil, we would run out of the planet's ability to handle it and we'd need to restrict our use of it anyway.
Reading comprehension isn't your forte is it
He was saying that if oil was a fossil fuel then it would have originated from above the Earths crust so burning it wouldn't introduce anything into the atmosphere that wasn't originally there, same as the cow farts you brought up for some reason.
Its called thinking, which you"re clearly hostile to. Both of us are sitting on the internet. Calm down
I never bought the Dead Dinosaur thing.
This has been known for ages.
Well Iām happy for you. I actually think I only first learned about this myself on this board less than a year ago and I remember thinking that was really cool. I still do. But I did then too š