I go by the rule of thumb that when a narrative makes no obvious sense, there must be something deeper in it. As we heard all this time about how Pompeo wanted to assassinate Julian Assange, we forgot to ask the one question "But why did he care so much?"
Part 1 - Vault 7 leak and Q operation
The WikiLeaks released Vault 7 documents in March 2017. Right after Trump came into power. What did Vault 7 really consist of?
Vault 7 is a series of documents that WikiLeaks began to publish on 7 March 2017, detailing the activities and capabilities of the United States Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) to perform electronic surveillance and cyber warfare.
Actually there is one exception to the cyber warfare. It also contains a project named Protego which is not a malware but a missile control system, that can, if used in a specific way, can cause a missile launch to fail.
Other than that its a collection of cyber hacking tools that CIA has been using for decades to gain access to all kinds of computers belonging to people, companies, countries and we can all imagine what purposes they would make use of that capability.
In a nutshell, Vault 7 leak rendered CIA blind to all the surveillance they were doing using their hacking tools. Two months after Trump took office. Let that simmer for a while.
If anyone thinks that this timing is a coincidence - that just as Trump started going after the Cabal, the CIA was rendered blind - can exit this thread now.
Two months after the Vault 7 leak, and all the computers around the world started patching for these vulnerabilities, and CIA was rendered blind, Trump announced his famous World Tour of Capitulation, and kicked off that trip with visit to Saudi Arabia and the famous sword dance, leading to the Saudi Coup that ousted the Cabal controller Al-Waleed bin Talal who was the handler of Obama amongst other things.
And this happened on the vey day Q told us Hillary would be arrested. The Cabal was taken completely by surprised. Almost as if they were blind to this move.
Okay I think I have established that Vault 7 was very key for Trump being able to clean up the Cabal and for Q to say "we have it all".
Part 2 - Mike Pompeo the raging monster against free speech
Now lets wonder aloud why Mike Pompeo would go nuclear against WikiLeaks for releasing Vault 7 files?
In April Pompeo made his first speech and his target was not NK or ISIS or anyone else. It was WikiLeaks. This speech was dubbed Pompeo Declares War on Free Speech by Assange.
Here is the WikiLeaks response to the speech.
So we have CIA blinded just before Trump started his moves against the Cabal, and his handpicked appointee for CIA Director declares a war on WikiLeaks. Interesting, eh?
I suggest people read this post by u/13Buddha to get a good idea of the kind of vitriol Pompeo spewed against Assange, WLs and anyone involved with Vault 7 release.
-
There was discussion of kidnapping him and dragging him back from Equadorian Embassy (Rendition)
-
There was discussion of assassinating him
-
They tried to get Equador to turn a blind eye to their rendition
-
They tried to get the British to take the shot if necessary for the assassination.
-
Everything was on the table. Pompeo said "NOTHING'S OFF LIMITS, DON'T SELF-CENSOR YOURSELF" to the CIA to come up with a plan to take out WL and JA.
And this is what Q told us: "Trust Kansas"
We now know what Sessions was doing. While he was exchanging his own vitriol vs Trump we knew he was secretly setting up all kinds of Special Counsels.
So what would you do if you were the CIA director who wanted to blind CIA but didnt want anyone to suspect it? You contort yourself in apoplectic rage and go on a war path against the leakers. You make the whole freedom loving world hate you.
And what do you do if you want to use this to find out every dirty trick up CIA's sleeve, and every dirty evil person within the ranks?
You gave the directive "NOTHING'S OFF LIMITS, DON'T SELF-CENSOR YOURSELF. I need operational ideas from you. I'll worry about the lawyers in Washington" and send messages directing CIA stations and bases worldwide to prioritize collection on WikiLeaks.
CIA might have been blinded of their cyber hacking capabalities, but they still had plenty of tricks up there sleeve, and you get them to expose it all.
Guess what else is a coincidence?
On March 6th 2018, the Sealed Indictment against Assange
A day after the sealed indictment is filed, Q drop 867 has a link to Clinton Emails related to the kidnapping of 33 kids by Laura Silsby - which is one of the solid links Anons found from the wikileaks DNC emails connecting Clintons to Haiti.
In April 2018, Pompeo left CIA and Trump appointed him as Secretary of State.
A week before Pompeo left CIA, Q made the famous drop 1195 with the
JUNE ETA
Almost as if his whole purpose in CIA was to do this operation against Assange.
Part 3 - Pompeo and his background.
When swamp creatures like Meuller or Comey or Haspel or RR or Pelosi or Schiff etc start attacking patriots, you know its because they have a long history in Cabal operations. Entrenched in it. You look at their history and it is filled with connections to evil stuff.
What about Pompeo? Here is an old article
As a kid he was influenced by Ayn Rand.
He graduated from West Point first in his class and served in US Army reaching rank of Captain, "patrolling the Iron Curtain before the fall of the Berlin Wall".
He then graduated Harvard Law School and then entered the business world as an Entrepreuner.
He then became a Congessman from Kansas, and notably was on the House Committee on Intel Oversight - the committee that oversees the CIA activities.
When he ran for Congress, this is what he said:
"I have run two small businesses in Kansas, and I have seen how government can crush entrepreneurism. That's why I ran for Congress. It just so happens that there are a lot of people in south central Kansas who agree with me on that."
And then he was tapped to become CIA director by Trump.
Nothing in his history says he is a Swamp creature, but he was in a position to know exactly what kind of shenanigans happens in CIA when he was in the Intel Committee.
Part 4 - The crucial questions
What exactly made Pompeo go nuclear against WikiLeaks for the Vault 7 Leak that helped Trump take down the Cabal ?
And the second question: Why did Trump not fire him, but instead tapped him for United States Secretary of State after CIA director ?
Conclusion
I present to you, my Anon frens, the entire witchhunt against Assange was a sting operation against CIA.
Added:
I am humbled by all the positive feedback I have received from the Anons here.
Interesting timleine u/bubble_bursts
I remember how 2 days after taking office Trump went straight to the CIA's HQ and taunted their sacred as just "wall".
https://greatawakening.win/p/12jwR2bA5y/trump-was-fearless-when-took-on-/c/
No president ever insulted their "wall" before.It was the equivalent of spitting in their face. One of the first things he did was going into the Lion's Den and throw down the gauntlet.
Later Rex fired most of the 7th floor.
https://greatawakening.win/p/12jwVlXkEG/the-7th-floor-is-no-more-how-rex/c/
This also feeds into blinding the CIA:
https://greatawakening.win/p/12jwR4sVIe/the-cia-keyhole-satellites-and-t/c/
If I remember correctly, in this same speech (at Langley) Trump also said something along the lines of
Veiled reference to the 5th Column in this country?
Thanks for the link with the breakdown...I just listened to that speech and didn't remember anything untoward regarding the wall... but with your proof/pointing, it now makes sense.
Great addition. Yes I remember that time Trump went and insulted their "wall". I assumemd that the Wall is basically the Cabal operatives who died while doing the Cabal's bidding.
Great post! Never new this info... Including Trump really good front of the wall, no president ever reading in front of the wall, and the CIA director being deeply insulted. That's awesome!
Great post! This is why I come here.
The memes, friendly discussion, (as for me most my submissions are muusic), fellowship/community, faith .... theyre all welcome sights here
but sometimes we need reminded this is such a world-changing operation to simply call it "huge" would be like calling a whale "a litle heavy". I love seeing posts like this because it reminds me there's an actual invisible war going on right now
My sentiments as well. You can tell this person has experience writing research papers by their citations of their reasoning.
A GAW member posted about going to a Pompeo event in 2021 or '2, and being impressed by the security detail, appearing SS-level or higher.. DS doesn't really need that.
(I also remember that Sec of State is in the line of succession. If the term of Trump and Pence expire, and there is no legitimate new Congress (i.e., no new Spkr, no Senate Pres), then the Scty of State is the first in line to be acting President. Most cabinet officials resigned, but I researched and couldn't find a resignation from Pompeo. It's out there, but I still think Pompeo as acting President is a possibility.)
This would be something else!!
WHOA …. that is INTERESTING!!!!!
Thanks, what a great post. I hadn't put that all together, but you connected everything very convincingly. Nice job!
And it feels good to not have queasy feelings about someone Trump has relied on for years.
Yes, and the first doubt came when they really went overboard with the rhetorics when it came to Pompeo. I mean, if he really was waging a war against assange, he wouldnt have declared it so openly, and would have done it clandestinely. After all the CIA must know a thing or two about clandestine!
BTW, I know there must be tons of more connections in this timeline. I added a few after the original post. I am hoping other Anons will find more connections.
The biggest question should be - "If Assange got a plea deal and is free now, what does this mean to this operation? Does it mean the sting operation is fully complete ?"
Great post btw. Those in the CiA would know Pompeo would not have been so open about going after Assange so why DID he do it? To fool those not in the CIA?
Moreover, why would info about Pompeo have come out through deep state MSM journalists, who are anti-trump? Could the info have been leaked to them deliberately because the leakers knew that they would gobble it up completely and write an article about it?
For those outside CIA - it gives the cover.
As for those inside CIA - the smart ones would stay out of it. The ones vested in the crime would be too short sighted to think about the bigger picture, and also would convince themselves that Trump admin are amateurs, better make the most of it.
The Cabal elites, wherever they hide, are narcissistic and would always think they hold the answers, power, etc and not conceive that they had been duped
Absolutely. This is why trump put in a show of being clueless, to further this ego
"Daedalus warned Icarus first of complacency and then of hubris, instructing him to fly neither too low nor too high,..."
But they have the same shortcomings as everyone , and continue to repeat the same mistakes over & over &....
https://greatawakening.win/p/141ra2y86V/overview-of-russiagate-scandal/c/
If JA confirms what we all know (Seth Rich leaked it) the entire Russiagate narrative falls apart and that means that was entirely fabricated.
WOW! Brilliant concept. Write ups like this are the reason I like it here, NOW it all makes sense.
Let me add that I happened to remember, that Rudy Giuliani met Assange at the Ecuadorian embassy shortly before he went to prison, for what I assumed was to negotiate a pardon but I can't seem to find any evidence of it online, today. I hate to say but, by the timing, I remember thinking that it almost seemed like him being sent to prison was a response to that meeting. (Like maybe they couldn't come up with a deal & so Trump team threw in the towel & made Equator not block his arrest or something like that)
Let's say my memory is correct. Maybe Giuliani & Assange DID make a deal & Assange agrees to help Trump team on this sting operation which is what seems to be starting now. Part of the deal, though, would to make sure Assange is kept in a safe place in the meanwhile and so maybe the prison he was sent to was a white hat controlled prison which can guarantee that Assange will be safe & no cabal member can possibly pernitrate.
If your memory is correct, I would think Giuliani was simple working out the logistics of keeping Assange safe. I think Assange was on the Q team from day one. No way this would work otherwise.
Indeed. Belmarsh Prison is high security but that could mean it's secure both ways. He doesn't look that bad for someone who has been in prison that long.
Assange always seemed to say that he was a socialist & he was adored by the left wing folk, early on. By that I mean it ADDS credence to what you say, when you take into account what we have learned about optics & how important it was for him to NOT look like he could be in cahoots with Trump.
After all that brilliant man has seen & read, how could he possibly be a socialist???!!!! So this was long in the making.
and makes sense why Trump didn't pardon him.
Yup. A pardon would be akin to putting a target on his back
This is both an amazing and excellent analysis. There is so much info to decipher in order to obtain the most accurate conclusions. It often "hurts" my brain. Thank you and all of the GAW anons who have such awesome left brain abilities.
TTTTTTTTTTHIS :-)
Quality post! I can promise everyone on this website that the Marines(in particular) play dumb but are always 3-4 steps ahead of the game.
Amazingly cogent and well constructed timeline. Well done.
As for my thoughts, Q said trust sessions and Pompeo and I've stuck to it. They both were pieces on the chess board and each had a role to play, which you laid out perfectly.
Again, well done and is one of the main reasons I keep coming back to this board; waiting for a brilliant breakdown of things I had suspect or already had pieces yet to put in place. Thank you 👊
This is a wonderfully written and thoughtful post. Thank you for posting it and I believe you make this a better site for having done so.
Totally plausible. Also very interesting, well-reasoned and researched.
An aside: Way back in the day, I think before Assange was even arrested, I happened upon a YouTube documentary about Australian cult leader Anne Hamilton Byrne founder of “The Family.” Aside from the rampant child abuse spanning dozens of children and several decades, the documentary claimed Julian Assange living there with his mother and a sibling for some time before moving onward. It also connected Byrne to Australia’s “intelligentsia,” most notably psychiatrists from Tavistock. That’s the part that interested me most, because of Tavistock’s alleged contributions to brainwashing techniques. This movie has apparently been going on a lot longer than we think, plot twists all along the way.
Here are a few articles, though, that reference the claim about Julian:
Growing Up with The Family
She Collected 28 Children
Julian Assange:WeJust Kept Moving
Very interesting. Never had heard of this before, thanks
I think he acknowledged as much himself, although without details.
What are thoughts on wiki leaks being acquired by TMTG?
I think Wikileaks must remain an independent organization. However its possible TMTG and Wikileaks will use a secure and censorproof platform for their backend. There was talk of Rumble filling that role.
https://files.catbox.moe/vpxwu4.jpg
And don't forget the whole Wizard of Oz (which was comms for Fed) where Dorothy was from Kansas!
This all makes so much sense!
A great post... I have a question. If this was a sting operation, dId Assange agree to being locked up for so many years.... or was he the pawn used to sting the cia
Have you seen the latest picture of Assange as he got out of the prison? Does he look like someone locked up for so many years? Don't hate me, but I don't think someone like Assange would be allowed to be tortured so badly, and there is no way this plan would work unless Assange was a very key player - not a pawn.
I know it sounds absurd and I wont push it further, but think about all the possibilities and you will see
GREAT addition (Assange's "look" stepping off the plane) to put an exclamation point on everything said above!!!
And if he is Trump's cousin, would it be likely? And why didn't Trump pardon him?
It makes sense (ref the pardon): Optics and Safety.
Bravo! Take my updoot!
Solid theory, Fren.
I can't wait to see what comes up next This is the best movie ever Love you guys from GAW just want to say Thank you!!!
The CIA is an extremist religious terrorist organization. They want to "accelerate civilization collapse" following Albert Pikes III's world wars plan. They deployed Covid-ChinaJoe, and the white hats allowed them to steal an election so that there is no "going back" for them. Q called them a Rogue Agency for a reason. Julian received his information in the same boards as Q posted on.
The main purpose of Q is to destroy the Cabal, but who is the Cabal? People controlled by the CIA. George Bush Senior was director of the CIA, then vice president, then president, then made his son president for two terms, Clinton and Obama's two terms, over 40 years of madness. There is no doubt in my mind that the whole of Q is a counter-op against this extremist religious organization = The Enemy Within. Assange took on a challenge that the Q team then continued. We are nearing the finish line. JFK started it, and Trump and his anons will finish it.
I think Assange was playing both sides. Until SR happened, and then SHTF.
Vault 7 leak rendered CIA blind to all the surveillance they were doing using their hacking tools.
Why would Wikileaks simply spilling the beans that the CIA has the capability to surveille/hack digitally ‘render the CIA blind’? It’s not like they were suddenly forced to stop doing it.
The hacking tools were based on exploits in various operating systems, that were deliberately not patched by the OS vendors.
Once the tools are public, the exploits are public and the OS vendors are forced to patch them all.
They still spy with hammer and scorecard.
Always was. :)
Another Trust Kansas...When questioned about the Election - He said we will count the votes, and I am sure we will see a second Trump administration.
u/#q23
There were two 23's referenced in the A WikiLeaks announcement tweet.
Also, did anyone else think Assange looked strangely healthy for a guy who's been in solitary confinement for years?
I have been thinking about it all day long, but too scared to put to words 🤣
Or they're gonna off him before Trump could free him and get him to testify in the Seth Rich case.
Great work!!
Very well reasoned. It flows, and is in keeping with the entire WH agenda.
Doubling down on this theory, Bubble.
Trust Kansas?
...WHIC