what we really need is a more current photo of Crooks (alive with no blood etc) and with his hair long. If that would come out I think people could see the resemblence better. As it stands now, while they look similar, it's not a fair comparison due to the young, short hair pics being all we can go on.
How many people set up their fingerprints to unlock their cell phone, laptop, or door keypad? Face ID to unlock your iphone anyone?
How many people took a "Covid Test?" That nasal swabbing was DNA collection. How many BILLIONS of people did that?
Will they design the next pandemic bioweapons to target specific people based on their DNA that was collected during the Plandemic?
Oh, you have the DNA of a Patriot? Hard-working, God-Loving, Family Providing, Independent, Freedom-Loving, Warrior? Targeted for Kill.
This is the world we live in because everyone wanted EASY and for Alexa, Google, and the Internet of Things to invade every precious place of privacy in our lives.
Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety.
Correct. Same with Ancestry dot com. They've been doing it for a long time and then China stepped in and grabbed it all with their Covid test swabs. Personal opinion.
Biometric data is a general term. Anything related to the biology of the person that can be measured. Could be dental. Could be DNA. Could be fingerprints. Could be facial recognition. Could be the person's retina. Could be...
They can take the placenta and sell it for upwards of 50K to do GOD KNOWS what kind of experiments. You also see zero of those dollars. I took mine home and threw it in the back field for wild animals to take lol :P
DNA analysis takes 1 to 2 hours according to this from the FBI
Rapid DNA, or Rapid DNA analysis, is a fully automated process of developing a DNA profile from a mouth swab. This happens in 1-2 hours—without the need for a DNA laboratory or any human intervention and review.
Yep. Depends on how complex of a test you want (like searching for rare gene variants might take a long time and need multiple tests due to false positives), but a test accurate enough to establish identity is not a complex test - it should only take a couple hours in an automated lab (not even a lab with a tech in it).
And they don’t need his DNA itself, just that of relatives, enough to say “this sample DNA is a male first cousin of SuchandSuch, and third cousin of suchandsuch” etc. Then you just cross reference against national id databases, birth records (FBI has all this) and boom you’ve got your person.
Most Americans have enough relatives in PUBLIC (this cannot be emphasized enough, it’s not even secret data it is public data) DNA databases to cross reference like that and establish identity.
About six or seven years ago my friend was given a citation for riding his mountain bike in an area that was restricted due to an endangered species of plant that grows there.
When it went to court the DA agreed to waive the fine, if he would submit to a DNA test. It seems like building a DNA database on everyone has been in the works for some time.
They collect it at birth and store it in a database. You can "decline" on the card, but all that means is they pinky promise they'll destroy the blood sample in 75 years.
Well back in the late 80's early 90's schools did this thing where local police came in and fingerprinted all kids. Ubder the guise of learning about finger prints. Think there was a parental consent form involved at the time. I would imagine that went into national security database at the time. I would imagine dna collection efforts are stored in a similar manner.
There are many public DNA databases. You don’t even need an FBI database for that - just some copies of a few public databases is more than sufficient. 80% of Americans could probably be identified by the ancestry.com database alone.
The actual DNA verification doesn’t take very long, it’s just backlogged for most criminal cases.
This could have been verified by collecting DNA from a search warrant on his house with his personal belongings, toothbrush, pillow, etc. then sent to the Quantico lab where it was tested immediately by their staff.
But I also don’t trust the FBI. I believe they wiped his history off the internet.
I think he was a shooter, maybe solo, but maybe one of two. But there is some fishy shit here
They also said his family was cooperating cooperating so they could use a family member.
But you're probably right. Search warrant would be super easy to get. His blood from scene and toothbrush from house could be flown to a lab and go straight to the front of the line.
I think Bolt carrier group probably has it right up thread
They have DNA from source.
To match it they could execute a search warrant on his house.
To do this they need to figure out his house. He drove a car to the shooting. That might be enough.
If you remember when this happened, the name of crooks was circulatng, but was not confirmed. NY Post printed his name, but FBI wouldn't confirm, even at the midnight press conference. They said they were waiting on biometric confirmation and they finally confirmed a couple hours after that first press conference.
In theory, biometrics from DMV database if he had a driver's license or State Dept. passport. The DNA is more unusual as where would the DNA match come from? 23&Me or Ancestry.com?
Yeah just like they're SURE he acted alone...but couldn't get into his phone....
Who's zoomin who bro? Do they honestly expect anyone with more than 70 IQ to believe ANY phone isn't back doored to hell? Such fantasies..."Muh iPhone...Sooooo secure..." Yeah okay...
Then Fags R Us said thru were able to get into it...
He's in a Blackrock promotion video, but he's totally not an actor... nope... just some guy that "was quiet and kept to himself..." En sheit...
See what happens after a weekend...they get paid to come up with all these stories...but not on Sunday because they pulled back on overtime 🙄🙄🙄
Do they honestly expect anyone with more than 70 IQ to believe ANY phone isn't back doored to hell?
This is a good point, but I don't believe they would want to confirm that unless it was for something they considered big. They don't like Trump - why would they burn ammo/info like admitting they can get in every phone? They just lie instead.
That could have been taken at any occasion when he received medical or dental services. Any medical institution would want to be able to identify him even if he did not have approved ID.
Fingerprints don't change. Every baby born in the U.S. has their hands and feet printed when they're born when a birth certificate is filed for. And their DNA is taken when they check for baby's blood sugar and vitamin levels.
There are many public DNA databases. It’s not hard to pinpoint somebody with the amount of data out there - if you have a sample of somebody’s DNA, you can find out who they are by their relatives that are in the databases.
If the databases have the DNA of a few of fourth cousins or closer, it’s not hard to figure out once cross referenced with legal documents of all your known relatives. Think about it - you have 12 of his relatives in the database already, you can see from his DNA he is first cousin of this one, third cousin of this one, second cousin of this one etc. It quickly becomes apparent that there are only one or two people it can be.
At this point, pretty much everyone has had multiple relatives send in DNA to ancestry.com, 23andMe, and whatnot. Those orgs turn around and sell access to their data law enforcement, pharmaceutical companies, etc. It’s a rare person out there that can’t be identified by their DNA anymore.
Another consideration is places like 23 and me, law enforcement have used those sources before. And you don't even necessarily need to have done the test yourself, just by someone related to you taking the test will immediately identify you as being related.
Another reason why I don't believe the shooter is who they say he is.
This… here is why https://boards.4chan.org/pol/thread/474283089
Don't think so
https://media.128ducks.com/file_store/00dbeb0742b1a24a0e368243e2eca1194fffd232ae0991959b9af98fb207f5fa.jpeg
What the source of that image? Especially the top row.
Also that pic is a mugshot right? From a while back?
his face looks like yearick but his ears are defo crooks... its so bizarre lol
what we really need is a more current photo of Crooks (alive with no blood etc) and with his hair long. If that would come out I think people could see the resemblence better. As it stands now, while they look similar, it's not a fair comparison due to the young, short hair pics being all we can go on.
This isn't CSI, dna identification would take some time.
I call BS on the idea they put out and confirmed his identity within 24hrs using DNA.
Yeah the tech isn't that advanced.
Most likely it is damage control from the FBI.
How many people set up their fingerprints to unlock their cell phone, laptop, or door keypad? Face ID to unlock your iphone anyone?
How many people took a "Covid Test?" That nasal swabbing was DNA collection. How many BILLIONS of people did that?
Will they design the next pandemic bioweapons to target specific people based on their DNA that was collected during the Plandemic?
Oh, you have the DNA of a Patriot? Hard-working, God-Loving, Family Providing, Independent, Freedom-Loving, Warrior? Targeted for Kill.
This is the world we live in because everyone wanted EASY and for Alexa, Google, and the Internet of Things to invade every precious place of privacy in our lives.
~ Benjamin Franklin
Correct. Well said!
23 and Me — name of person
Does fbi have ability to ask 23 and Me for dna matches?
Correct. Same with Ancestry dot com. They've been doing it for a long time and then China stepped in and grabbed it all with their Covid test swabs. Personal opinion.
Biometric data could just be dental records.
Biometric data is a general term. Anything related to the biology of the person that can be measured. Could be dental. Could be DNA. Could be fingerprints. Could be facial recognition. Could be the person's retina. Could be...
Maybe he shoved his phone up his ass once, which is how they got a DNA sample.
Hospitals take DNA samples at birth whether they disclose this or not.
They can take the placenta and sell it for upwards of 50K to do GOD KNOWS what kind of experiments. You also see zero of those dollars. I took mine home and threw it in the back field for wild animals to take lol :P
Did they bill you for $50k
I went to a birthing center, I gave birth and was back home six hours later. The placenta came home in a cooler lawl
Awesome - I heard the new/old thing was for the mother to digest it like in a smoothie or something
DNA analysis takes 1 to 2 hours according to this from the FBI
Here's some vendors of Rapid DNA tech
https://www.thermofisher.com/us/en/home/industrial/forensics/human-identification/forensic-dna-analysis/dna-analysis/rapidhit-id-system-human-identification.html
https://bodetech.com/services/rapid-dna-services/
^correct
That is fast. I didn't know this quickness was available for DNA analysis-a lot has changed since my time.
Yep. Depends on how complex of a test you want (like searching for rare gene variants might take a long time and need multiple tests due to false positives), but a test accurate enough to establish identity is not a complex test - it should only take a couple hours in an automated lab (not even a lab with a tech in it).
And they don’t need his DNA itself, just that of relatives, enough to say “this sample DNA is a male first cousin of SuchandSuch, and third cousin of suchandsuch” etc. Then you just cross reference against national id databases, birth records (FBI has all this) and boom you’ve got your person.
Most Americans have enough relatives in PUBLIC (this cannot be emphasized enough, it’s not even secret data it is public data) DNA databases to cross reference like that and establish identity.
Interesting point in the thread they have his bio data - but not his cell phone.
They don't have anything, they faked it so people would believe they found it "scientifically".
DNA matching science is largely the same as vaccine science (i.e. not at all conclusive).
They have access now
About six or seven years ago my friend was given a citation for riding his mountain bike in an area that was restricted due to an endangered species of plant that grows there.
When it went to court the DA agreed to waive the fine, if he would submit to a DNA test. It seems like building a DNA database on everyone has been in the works for some time.
I would have asked to double my fine please. Love the name btw.
They collect it at your pediatrician and sometimes at school now, actually they may even collect it upon birth
They collect it at birth and store it in a database. You can "decline" on the card, but all that means is they pinky promise they'll destroy the blood sample in 75 years.
While plausible who has the database?
Well back in the late 80's early 90's schools did this thing where local police came in and fingerprinted all kids. Ubder the guise of learning about finger prints. Think there was a parental consent form involved at the time. I would imagine that went into national security database at the time. I would imagine dna collection efforts are stored in a similar manner.
Oh yeah, I remember that! It was like a 'fun day with the police' or something
There are many public DNA databases. You don’t even need an FBI database for that - just some copies of a few public databases is more than sufficient. 80% of Americans could probably be identified by the ancestry.com database alone.
This whole thing glows really badly, doesn't it?
This cover story keeps getting worse and worse.
This alphabet agency OP stinks to high hell
The spooks can't even spook well lately. Probably DEI hires.
Yearick wasn't supposed to die. The whole OP needed him to escape so Crooks could take the fall.
https://greatawakening.win/p/17teNj6kHQ/yearick-was-supposed-to-survive-/
The actual DNA verification doesn’t take very long, it’s just backlogged for most criminal cases.
This could have been verified by collecting DNA from a search warrant on his house with his personal belongings, toothbrush, pillow, etc. then sent to the Quantico lab where it was tested immediately by their staff.
But I also don’t trust the FBI. I believe they wiped his history off the internet.
I think he was a shooter, maybe solo, but maybe one of two. But there is some fishy shit here
This makes a lot more sense. Also for other kinds of biometrics, if he ever went to a dentist then his dental records would be on file too.
He drove a car to the location.
They could check DMV database.
He brought a gun to the location. They could track who the gun was sold to.
Trying to think of any other things odd anything else.
They also said his family was cooperating cooperating so they could use a family member.
But you're probably right. Search warrant would be super easy to get. His blood from scene and toothbrush from house could be flown to a lab and go straight to the front of the line.
They Identified him because they groomed him to be a patsy for the real shooter that was on the water tower!
CIA - blood in blood out
Vaccinated presumably, they have his MAC address on record.
Kek
That means it probably starts with FCE33C
He would have to be really stupid to bring his phone. But maybe he was.
Would have been fingerprints on the weapon and ladder, but still, what database would they test it against?
PLUS: Car keys would have led them to car, which could be ID'd. Then, on to house, etc.
I think Bolt carrier group probably has it right up thread
They have DNA from source. To match it they could execute a search warrant on his house.
To do this they need to figure out his house. He drove a car to the shooting. That might be enough.
If you remember when this happened, the name of crooks was circulatng, but was not confirmed. NY Post printed his name, but FBI wouldn't confirm, even at the midnight press conference. They said they were waiting on biometric confirmation and they finally confirmed a couple hours after that first press conference.
Could it be related to Q’s last drop about what’s coded in our DNA and who put it there? and why? And why there’s a war for our DNA?
Lots of school programs offered fingerprinting and dna samples at the parent’s consent as a means to help quickly identify kids in abduction cases.
Crooks probably checked his genealogy on Ancestry.com or 23andMe back in the day.
I looked him up and it seems that they have erased a lot of his info. I had to find out who his parents are through home ownership docs.
In theory, biometrics from DMV database if he had a driver's license or State Dept. passport. The DNA is more unusual as where would the DNA match come from? 23&Me or Ancestry.com?
Up thread someone suggested they would get a warrant to search his house
The parents let them in - saw video on OAN.
They could get samples from his home. Did they, idk?
I had to scroll soooo far to find someone with basic logical sense.
His family is cooperating.
The gun was traced to his Dad. His car was at the location.
Yeah just like they're SURE he acted alone...but couldn't get into his phone....
Who's zoomin who bro? Do they honestly expect anyone with more than 70 IQ to believe ANY phone isn't back doored to hell? Such fantasies..."Muh iPhone...Sooooo secure..." Yeah okay...
Then Fags R Us said thru were able to get into it...
He's in a Blackrock promotion video, but he's totally not an actor... nope... just some guy that "was quiet and kept to himself..." En sheit...
See what happens after a weekend...they get paid to come up with all these stories...but not on Sunday because they pulled back on overtime 🙄🙄🙄
This is a good point, but I don't believe they would want to confirm that unless it was for something they considered big. They don't like Trump - why would they burn ammo/info like admitting they can get in every phone? They just lie instead.
Is possible bio-data collected when 18yr old men are required to register for the selective service (draft?)
I'd like to know that answer too. I never registered for the selective service - probably because I went into the USAF at 17.
That could have been taken at any occasion when he received medical or dental services. Any medical institution would want to be able to identify him even if he did not have approved ID.
ID'd in about twenty minutes or so.
Fingerprints don't change. Every baby born in the U.S. has their hands and feet printed when they're born when a birth certificate is filed for. And their DNA is taken when they check for baby's blood sugar and vitamin levels.
Dude lived at home - tooth brush, comb, sample from his sheets, any.number of places at his house to get a DNA sample for confirmation.
But first, ya gotta know which house to go search.
No ID. No name. No way to know.
Maybe they figured out which car was his, and found info there.
If he had his car keys on him with a remote door unlock, it would have been easy. Plus, the plates would bring up address.
So, not so strange, when you consider the possibilities.
Unless he stole a car, a car is a strong identifier.
They also traced the gun to his dad.
Way to work it through, fren
Patsy
Watch X22Report from last night.
He explains what happened and it makes sense.
There were two shooters
Too long to explain.
is the shooter even crooks?
So that means the gov has collected our DNA. I know they have mine because the military took it for identification if I got killed.
I hope this gets investigated. How did they have the biometrics?
Maybe they cut a finger off or popped an eye out, like in the movies.
There are many public DNA databases. It’s not hard to pinpoint somebody with the amount of data out there - if you have a sample of somebody’s DNA, you can find out who they are by their relatives that are in the databases.
I guess I am having a hard time believing a 20 year old had a DNA trail. But hey, maybe I am outdated lol
If the databases have the DNA of a few of fourth cousins or closer, it’s not hard to figure out once cross referenced with legal documents of all your known relatives. Think about it - you have 12 of his relatives in the database already, you can see from his DNA he is first cousin of this one, third cousin of this one, second cousin of this one etc. It quickly becomes apparent that there are only one or two people it can be.
At this point, pretty much everyone has had multiple relatives send in DNA to ancestry.com, 23andMe, and whatnot. Those orgs turn around and sell access to their data law enforcement, pharmaceutical companies, etc. It’s a rare person out there that can’t be identified by their DNA anymore.
Another similarity to 1963. W/in an hour, they "knew" Oswald had killed JFK and was the lone assassin.
Another consideration is places like 23 and me, law enforcement have used those sources before. And you don't even necessarily need to have done the test yourself, just by someone related to you taking the test will immediately identify you as being related.
I saw this last night, fairly interesting. Was Crooks MK-Ultra’d? Was he alone? https://youtu.be/NZDjinvC6Ik?si=Ggnh5MKZAJR7AoGB
Let me guess they cremated the body as well? Clowns.