The window would have moved already if someone hadn't tried to nail it shut.

Oh Brave New World!

I'm ready to "jump like a feral cat" but I'm thankful for this treat offered by the u/mods 😸

Shout out to those who watched What in the World Are They Spraying? in 2010. [They] came out with the "geoengineering is good" response a few years ago, revelation of method.

Now Candace can tell Bobby about that Great Replacement ....

Whoa whoa whoa whoa.

Who says anything about spraying it on other countries?

We're the ones who must fall first after all!

All said and done, this was an amusing post.

The truth will always be the truth, regardless of the rules of the governing body, in this case, the mods. In defense of the mods, remember that there is a high chance that they are more aware of the overall plan, and that there are specific topics that they may highlight or refuse to promote because of optics and the time frame of event driven operations, not necessarily because they are just being dense. If you do have a subject-matter that is frowned upon by the mods, but is supported even subtly by a Q post, and you have evidence and logic to back up your argument, I feel like that kind of discussion should be encouraged...BUT, before you put your flat earth hat on, take a big step back and literally f**k your own face.

Amen TaQo, my personally observed experience as well. Was bullhorning this as I have a vast view of open sky, long before chemtrails was a common term.

The time to know what is in these, and to what purpose, is decades ago.

Anecdotal but I’ll tell you this… I’ve never seen one contrail or chemtrail in Hawaii. Not one. Beautiful blue skies, fluffy clouds, plenty of natural rain, and not one stupid contrail or chemtrail. Not even near the airport or where there’s a flight path. Not one. ☝️

Why? For one, it would be too obvious, also, it’s too expensive for them to have planes only flying from one island to the other to poison them. Besides that they can just take DEW weapons and burn your town down if they want to. Why waste their time on chemicals in the sky 🤷‍♀️

I mean they're openly admitting to it...

John Brennan - STI

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dR9Zz7y3W4I

This reply is pretty much a textbook example of why 'chemtrails' will continue to be one of the most heavily moderated topics on GAW ( Along with flat earth, Which is only barely 1mm below chemtrails in the conspiracy toilet).

If chemtrails and geoengineering were fantasy, then why are multiple states putting laws on the books to outlaw it?

Outlaw WHAT, exactly? Has anyone here even read Tennessee's bill banning 'chemtrails,'?? This "bill" can be found here:

https://wapp.capitol.tn.gov/apps/BillInfo/Default.aspx?BillNumber=HB2063 ⁰

I fed it into GPT, and here's what I got:

Summary of the Bill:

• Purpose: The bill prohibits the intentional injection, release, or dispersion of chemicals, chemical compounds, substances, or apparatus into the atmosphere within Tennessee's borders with the express purpose of affecting temperature, weather, or the intensity of sunlight.

Analysis Based on Your Questions:

1. Source of Chemtrails:

   • The bill does not specifically identify the source of chemtrails. It broadly addresses any intentional injection or dispersion of chemicals aimed at altering weather or sunlight.

2. Definition of Chemtrailing:

   • The bill does not explicitly define "chemtrailing." However, it implies that any action involving the dispersion of chemicals to affect weather or sunlight would fall under this category.

3. Prohibited Substances:

   • The bill does not list specific chemicals or substances that are prohibited. It generally bans the intentional release of any chemicals, chemical compounds, or substances for the stated purpose.

4. Enforcement:

   • The bill does not detail specific enforcement mechanisms or procedures. It focuses on the prohibition itself without outlining how compliance will be monitored or enforced.

5. Penalties:

   • The bill does not specify penalties for violations. It simply states the prohibition without detailing the consequences of breaking the law.

6. Responsible Authority:

   • The bill does not assign enforcement responsibility to any specific officer or department within the Tennessee government. There is no mention of which governmental body would be in charge of detecting or implementing the bill's provisions.

Key Points:

• Technical Standpoint: The bill is vague in terms of specific substances and sources related to chemtrails.
• Definitions: It does not provide a detailed definition of chemtrailing.
• Prohibited Poisons: No specific chemicals or poisons are named.
• Enforcement Mechanism: There is no clear enforcement strategy outlined.
• Penalties: The bill lacks details on penalties for non-compliance.
• Responsible Department: No specific governmental department or officer is designated for enforcement duties.

Conclusion: The bill broadly prohibits activities related to chemtrailing without providing detailed definitions, enforcement mechanisms, specific penalties, or responsible authorities. It focuses on the general prohibition of dispersing chemicals to affect weather or sunlight within Tennessee, leaving many specifics open to interpretation and implementation by future regulations or guidelines.

Well? What exactly would anyone with that functioning fucking brain say that Tennessee has legislated against? NOTHING. Who's enforcing this? NOBODY. What's the definition in the bill of what these commercial aircry are supposedly spraying over us six times a day? NOTHING.

What's the mod team supposed to even do with this?

Are we trying to throttle discussion? DISCUSSION ABOUT WHAT, exactly??

Speaking not only for myself, but, as lead mod around here, WE ARE SO FED UP WITH THIS MORONIC GARBAGE, AND SO FED UP WATCHING MODS TAKE ABUSE OVER THIS ABSOLUTE NONSENSE.

This mod team absolutely 100% supports hardcore research and delving down into any issue as long as it takes down the deep state. But this trash? We are giving absolutely 100% very, very long vacations to retards that somehow get lost and wander onto the playing field, spouting nonsense not even the Tennessee legislature can adequately describe in their bill. These frogs then go on to ridicule others for not believing thisY MENTALLY RETARDED GARBAGE.

If RFK Jr wants to direct our researchers towards actual proof of chemtrails, then great. But, I'll say it again: this is an elite research board, not a digital daycare for people too mentally simple to understand airline logistics, chemistry, or everything else we need to actually bootstrap this 'conspiracy' into the collective consciousness. Remember: OUR JOB IS TO REDPILL THE NORMIES.

It's why GAW still lives. You do not suffer from this level of 'censorship' in c/conspiracies.

I've also heard that time is an illusion and space is a fractal. Could be true, but I'm on GAW. It's a different topic.

What we are saying is, until RFK Jr offers more details, discussions about these and many many other topics still belong on c/conspiracies.win

Texas has 5 weather modification regions all available on its government website. You have to look under licensing though, like anyone would look there. 🙄

This is a great link, I’ve added it to my thread as well. Thank you.

Sir. Well done.

Excellent resource... Thanks.

Here is a useful resource on the same general topic:

https://contrailscience.com/

To summarize the basics:

• Chemtards cannot explain what is being sprayed.

• Chemtards cannot explain how it is being sprayed (commercial jets? Bullshit)

• Chemtards cannot explain why it is being sprayed.

• Chemtards cannot explain who is paying for the mystery substance(s) plus the spraying itself.

• And the big one: chemtards cannot explain how the people doing all the spraying somehow manage NOT TO BE AFFECTED THEMSELVES.

Do they all live deep underground? Do they not breathe the same air as the rest of us? How exactly do they themselves avoid the effects of the chemtrails they are spraying everwhere?

If any of those questions can be answered, then I will change my mind and adapt to the new information. But so far, none of the chemtards can answer ANY of those questions.

Imagine trying to label something that everyone can clearly see in the sky, with their own eyes, as a “conspiracy theory.”

The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command. - George Orwell, 1984

I find the arguments for and against both annoying because neither side presents their arguments well and neither side acknowledges the point for the other.

From where I stand, I see the capability of doing so and a special kind of trust in the government that they would in fact do things to harm us and hide it.

I like to look at it as a badge of honor. Same thing when someone calls me a Qtard. Yes, yes I am actually. o7

Ok wait! I got it. I think everyone on this board will like this one. Is it ever right to show adolescents pornographic material so that they can understand sex? Obviously no, right?

But if they figure it out themselves you can't erase that knowledge from there minds. As a good parent or guardian you are still gonna do your best to make sure they don't get pregnant/get anyone else pregnant. I mean that's pretty much how I view the whole military secrets thing now...

I mean if anyone linked currently classified (and unredacted) files on this site it would be %100 illegal and anyone who did this could be prosecuted. That is a fact.

Lmao, give catsfive a break, he is still waking up.

Oops. You promised no flat earth

I approve this request.

More pointless a topic there scarcely could be.

(flat terra notwithstanding)

This post was a rollercoaster to read this early.

But yeah, screw people who won't even come forth and state an argument why they disagree with you.

if you guys can Indulge my postulating of an idea for a moment, then you may possibly gain an understanding of topics like this from different angle. Imagine, if you can, that you are in a world where chem-trails and weather-modding is real and you know without a doubt that it is real....But you also knew that it had been used as a weapon (for a period of time) by the cabal for nefarious purposes. Now imagine that it now is (in this world) being covertly used by the other side as well (still as a weapon) but for good/better purposes. Now, If you claim to be with the non cabal side of the fight, would it be a good idea for you to bring attention to this fact, in the public sphere, in a very scientific and rational way? ....Moving on.... Now, even if some of these (now cliche) topics have truth to them then maybe consider what else could be true. Consider how many leaks there were in the Manhattan project. If you already know the correct answer (which is easy to find with a simple search) then i think you know where I'm going with this. Even though I'm not going to spell it out the rest for you I will say that there really is a larger point that I'm trying to make. If I were still trying to find figure out if any of this was even possible, I would start by thinking bigger. I'd start by thinking of all the things that may be possible that no one has even mentioned on internet blogs or forums. Ask yourself why even the Aztec royalty thought the Spanish Conquistadors were Gods for a long enough time for most of them and their subjects to die of syphilis and smallpox? What lesson can we learn from that?

What we've learned is that the more someone's post history resembles yours (phew! It's good to hear that you love God, but, Jesus Christ, you sure don't love posting here), the more 'arrogant' the mod team appears to them 🐸👍

But he's proteccing us. It's for your own good trust.

Sidebar. This is not a free speech platform. Speech is "free" because (unlike your anemic post history) supply exceeds demand. This is a Q board. Topics allowed revolve around Q and The Great Awakening.

Any questions, consult your sidebar. Any further questions, feel free to contact the mod team.

The grids are caused by the air moving at high altitudes and the Jets going down the same ATC channels

And guess what…they haven’t sprayed since the eclipse, and just did a couple of weeks ago. That week, people got the quick flu, and it spread quickly from that moment. Have not sprayed since. Math tells me that…Is it possible to do that though? It’s just the only outright answer. 🤷🏻‍♂️

Again, Cloud seeding, weather modification by the military or specialized plans, that doesn't explain the Chemtrails Theory that creates thousands upon thousands of lines in the sky on six continents.

Narcissists are never embarrassed about who they are

No, NO ONE is running the show over at c/conspiracies.. That's the point. And, want to know who should be embarrassed? Anyone with your post history (phew!). I suggest you spend some time over there........

even if RFK Junior screams it from the rooftops.

THIS IS LITERALLY THE POINT OF THIS STICKY

Flat earthers, moon landing deniers, and other mental midgets are still banned on sight here on GAW. They are of course welcome to frolic on c/conspiracies. Everyone should go and look at that WIN if they want to experience a forum where the moderators do not remove low info, low effort morons and idiots from their midst.

They don't mind eating crow I guess.

No

The other thing about that, according to people I've seen posting from Tennessee, once they banned the "conspiracy theory" the skies quickly cleared up.

Weird.

You mean like this? What did they ban, exactly? IT WAS INDEED A WASTE OF TIME.

https://greatawakening.win/p/17txy7b8Gk/x/c/4ZDtkYOrzJI

Yep, even Instagram has all kinds of channels discussing this topic. Instagram of all places. And no one is getting banned there, not for this topic

Notice how every time we'd have a influx of new users we'd suddenly have a surge of moon hoaxers, flat earthers, and even chemtards to try to scare away awakening newbies. Certain theories definitely serve to poison the well, like how immediately screaming about "the Jews" turns off normies and causes them to spit out the red pill before they actually swallowed it.

Did Q ever bring it up? No. Did Q+ choose RFK as his running mate? Yes. Did his running mate bring up the concept of chemtrails? For the first time ever, yes, the concept of contrails now falls within the Q domain. Therefore, until RFK decides to clarify further exactly what he's talking about, we wait. Other than ancient aerial dispersal patents from the 1960s and garbage from midwit geoengineering websites, What is there to talk about that somehow falls on Q? Nothing. How is this so hard to understand?

Pandamoon17 for mod! 😆

All I can say is this: chem trails exist. It is a known fact

Literally nothing literally nothing summarizes the chemtrail arguments more than th the chemtrail arguments better than the above sentence.

?

I heard Tennessee banned chemtrails. Okay... So let's get this... Chemtrails is an illegal program designed to kill Americans, supposedly. But AH, OKAY, they're going to politely switch off the illegal spraying because of some random state law?

I swear I wonder what planet I'm on sometimes. What is the poison they are spraying? Are they bring it from separate tanks other than the fuel tanks? Does anyone even understand how airplanes even work? For instance, Airbus makes an A350- 1000 that flies 2000 nautical miles further than the Boeing 787-10 because the Boeing doesn't have the fuel capacity the A350 does. Consequently, nobody's really buying the 787-10 and it's bothering Boeing greatly. You would think Boeing would eliminate the chemtrail tanks so they could have extra fuel in fly further and sell more planes, right? BUT NO... Boeing is just going to sell less airplanes so that they can keep the chemtrail tanks active? Honestly. How does it work?

I've been asking chemtards this question ever since I got here and not once have I gotten it a cogent answer that makes any sense to any rational, intelligent human being, especially when with 10 years of airline experience like it me

Nobody, and I mean nobody in the airline business (where I worked for 5 years) thanks chemtrails are real. You have to believe that airplanes are just mechanical magical carpets to think that anyone is secretly spraying on you

And yet, why can no one explain the airline Logistics necessary to spray six lines over the heads of 200 plus chemtards on six continents every day?

Its fucking dank right?

So, basically:

"I have spent most my entire life outdoors from dusk to dawn, and things have changed over the last 20 or so years with what we have been seeing in the sky."

I spend over a decade of my life working around airplanes—first as a refueller at the YYC and then in airline operations & training with a major Canadian airline. The reason things have changed is because things have CHANGED, and I mean radically so. I'm old enough to remember an entirely different airline industry.

You don't see the "same contrails" because you don't "see" the same planes. And back then the jet engines weren't as advanced as they are today. The skies back then were jam packed with jets like the 727, MD-8X, the 737-200, and the most common engine in the skies were the low-bypass turbofan engines such as the Pratt & Whitney JT8D (look up a pic of it!). These engines were dramatically less efficient and produced way more emissions compared to modern high-bypass turbofans. Low-bypass engines have a smaller ratio of air bypassing the core to air passing through the core, making them less efficient, the exhaust has significantly higher levels of unburnt hydrocarbons, carbon monoxide, and nitrogen oxides, and tons of small dusty particulates. Look up a 727 taking off. They look like a B-52! They mixed with whatever water vapour was in the exhaust and quickly fell to Earth. See how dirty they are??

THAT'S why they were different.

You are correct, you are noticing changes, but it's time to "notice WHAT you are noticing." Damn right things have changed since you were a kid, and here's what's changed:

• WE FLY SIX TIMES MORE MILES IN THE SKY THAN IN 2001. The cost PPPM (per passenger, per mile) has literally dropped like a stone, meaning that it's cheaper to fly now than at any other time in history.
• WE FLY ENTIRELY DIFFERENT ROUTES NOW THAN WE DID IN 2001. Back then, it was "hub and spoke," and it was common to make a stop (usually in Denver, Chicago, or Minneapolis) on your way across the country. Not anymore. Now pretty much everywhere you fly, you can pretty much get a direct route there. This means a few things:
• PLANES FLY LONGER ROUTES AND STAY AT HIGHER THAN EVER CRUISING ALTITUDES. It used to beg FL28 on average (28,000 feet), now it's FL33, and even altitudes on up to 38,000 feet are common, now.
• ENGINES ARE MORE EFFICIENT. Look up the GE LEAP-1B, which powers the 737 Max AND the A320NEO). Compare the 737-MAX's super advanced LEAP-1B jet to the JT8D. It delivers 35,000 pounds of thrust vs the JT8D's 17,000 pounds of thrust ALL WHILE BURNING 20% LESS FUEL per flight hour. How does it do that?? Because it burns SO MUCH MORE efficiently. And the rest of the planes now are made of composites (the entire Max is mostly composite, including the wings, tail, and body tube). That saves weight, meaning the airlines can do more up there and offer more of everything.

THAT is what you are seeing over the past 20 years. Flying at FL250 (25,000 feet) generally results in fewer contrails compared to FL350 (35,000 feet) due to atmospheric conditions. At higher altitudes like FL350, the air is FAR colder and more humid, which are prime conditions for contrail formation when the moisture in the air condenses and freezes around aircraft engine exhaust particles. In contrast, at FL250, the air is typically warmer and less saturated with moisture, reducing the likelihood of contrail formation as the conditions are less conducive to the moisture in the exhaust freezing into ice crystals.

THAT is why you see more contrails.

But of course, It's not changes to the airplanes or the airlines or the way we fly or the fact that you can fly from New York to LA for 500 bucks these days. It's the CIA!

You do know that AJ was correct about that, right? The high levels of exposure to estrogen in the environment is causing problems. https://news.berkeley.edu/2010/03/01/frogs/