They are clearly working on behalf and in complete support of the American people for pennies on the dollar. Let’s all say “thank you Congress for your dedication and hard work. Thank you Ilhan you brother fucking maggot fuck. Thank you Dan Crenshaw you one eyed Soi boi pirate fondler.”
I've never seen the "appeal" in that woman. I think just a lot of us are attracted to crazy because of the hint of what it can do under the right circumstances. But to me, AOC looks like the same horse-faced scrawny gint all these WEF "click .exe to install" leaderettes look like. It's like they're all cloned from the same bony bitch.
AOC is a gnawy, ugly beanpole who looks like she'd bite my dick off if I let her near it. I'm not into raw veganism bitches. For me, give me a full bodied (not fat) luxurious woman with all the right turns at all the right places. Strawberry blond, green eyes, some freckles? I'm there :)
Y'all are just stultified by AOC because she's a skinny Latina. You're staring at her like a miracle because besides her there aren't any, lol.
He better keep that patch on. If one of these Afgan goat rapers we keep bringing into our country see his head Sphincter, he'll get skull fucked for sure.
Interesting ! .... It also stated says - "They shall in all cases, Except Treason , Felony and Breach of Peace, be privileged from arrest during attendance at the session.
I think they committed treason no ? or am I misinterpreting. Just woke up..kek
Didn't CONgress exempt themselves from the laws regarding insider trading? They exempt themselves from everything else, I can't really see them overlooking those.
Oh wow, you had me geeking out there for a minute. In college I failed finite math twice. Finally found out that I could get my last math credit by taking Philosophy Logic. So I jumped on it, I hate numbers. Words are my friends. I aced that class and tutored half of it. That must be a left brain/right brain thing.
lol I can't do numbers either and I was able to take some intro to computers class instead of a math class in college and that counted as a math credit.
Your analysis of the logical rules is incorrect. I'll define it formally for you:
A => Committed treason
B => Protected from arrest
If: A -> !B
Then: B -> !A
This is the textbook definition of the logical contrapositive. You can absolute conjecture that it's impossible to know A prior to a trial, therefore the conclusion might be wrong, but that's not a "converse error." My application of the rule is correct.
The converse error refers to an incorrect application of a statement's converse, in which a proof states that A -> B, therefore B -> A. That's patently wrong, and also not what I did.
Did I interpret the constitution incorrectly? The post seems to indicate that Congress is using an extended session to protect themselves from arrest. If treason is not covered under types of issues protected from arrest, then it would not make sense that they would extend the session to protect themselves from arrest for treason.
I think it comes down to that, and also to whether or not the arrest would be legal. If we're willing to commit crimes to arrest criminals, then our laws mean nothing.
(We do have problems with unequal applications of justice, so there's a lot more to talk about on that topic.)
As long as they get arrested, I don't much care when it is. Though I'd prefer if it was in the act of something.... offensive and compromising. Something even normies can't overlook.
It's like working 75% of the time and getting paid your full salary (plus tens of millions in kickbacks, bribes, and money laundering proceeds, but these are minor details).
They were never meant to make their positions a year-round endeavor. This year-long crime against the people must be exposed along with a great many other things. Their duties and responsibilities are few; the privileges afforded to them to accomplish said duties are just THAT, not rights of any kind. WE, the people, have the rights.
I need to see if my retirement portfolio manager can invest in a fund that will benefit from it; if you can't beat their fraud, might as well take advantage of it :)
Interesting theory. Not to discredit it, but does anybody else have a hard time taking something seriously when there are random capitalized words for no apparent reason and it is riddled with emojis? Maybe just my weird tired brain.
I feel like that might be talking about me... nah not really, I know That One Guy you're referring to, but I'm totally guilty of it too.
I think it's because of all those days as a try-hard teenager making Xanga and Myspace layouts and backgrounds <b>that I wanted to POP OUT</b> <i>and look super cool.</i>
Sorry I just know where the emphasis is supposed to go and I cant help myself😪 Shame*!*
Yeah, I'm the same way. Sometimes I'll start reading an article posted here and the random ALL CAPS makes me re-evaluate how seriously I take the author.
They also do this.
One sentence in one line, for emphasis.
With emojis it's the worst - you may be posting a shocking article on miscarriages after the vax but if your title is emoji-riddled 💉🧬💉👺 (title) 👺💉🧬🔥🔥 - I'll most likely not click on it.
They're still in session because they want to do as much damage as possible before they're routed out. I got this email from Senator Bob Casey (D) of Pennsylvania:
"Earlier this month, Senate Democrats capped off a historically productive legislative session with one of the most significant pieces of legislation in modern American history: The Inflation Reduction Act. On Friday, House Democrats passed the bill, sending it to President Biden's desk to be signed into law.
THE INFLATION REDUCTION ACT: LOWERS PRESCRIPTION DRUG COSTS: Medicare will have the authority to negotiate prescription drug prices; Caps out-of-pocket costs for Medicare recipients at $2,000 a year -- EXTENDS ACA HEALTH CARE TAX CREDITS THROUGH 2025: Extends the enhanced premium tax credits created through the American Rescue Plan; Estimated monthly savings for a family of four with a household income of $75,000: $248 -- PUTS THE UNITED STATES ON TRACK FOR CLIMATE GOALS: Hundreds of billions of dollars in tax credits to lower families' energy costs; Will reduce U.S. greenhouse gas emissions by 40% by 2030 -- REDUCES THE DEFICIT AND CREATES JOBS: Lowers the deficit by $305 billion without raising taxes on people making less than $400,000 per year; Creates an estimated 9 million jobs over the next decade
The Inflation Reduction Act will improve lives across the Commonwealth and the Nation. In addition to lowering costs for families who have been squeezed by inflation, this bill may be our last chance to act on the climate crisis before it's too late. And we're going to create new, high-paying American manufacturing jobs in clean energy to do it. It's also a fiscally responsible bill that will bring down our national debt by ensuring the most profitable corporations start paying their fair share, just as American families have been doing all along.
I am proud of all that this Congress has so far accomplished. We've made transformational investments in the U.S. economy and American workers. Between the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, the CHIPS and Science Act, and now the Inflation Reduction Act, we have passed legislation that will boost the economy and create jobs in our infrastructure, supply chain, domestic manufacturing and clean energy sectors.
I look forward to building on these successes and continuing to deliver results for Pennsylvania.
They have been out of session many times since Trump left the White House. What makes NOW special? If we have been in a State of Emergency for the last 2 years why weren't they arrested when they went out of session previously? What's changed?
To work 95 days out of the year, give yourself pay raises, make side deals with nations to pocket $$, have aids, staff write thousands of pages of bills you don’t know what it entails but just rubber stamp—-what a racket!
I can't believe these couple sentences from that link. "By the 1950s the job of a U.S. senator was a full-time, year-round job and there were very few breaks built into the legislative calendar. In 1963, for example, the Senate met from January to December without a break longer than a three-day weekend." Wow, they had to actually work a whole year with nothing longer than a three-day weekend? Cry me a river!
Biden will deliver remarks and sign the bill, known as the Inflation Reduction Act, at an event in the White House's State Dining Room, the White House announced Monday.
It will likely be a smaller ceremony, with Congress out of session and most members involved in the bill's passage out of town.
They are clearly working on behalf and in complete support of the American people for pennies on the dollar. Let’s all say “thank you Congress for your dedication and hard work. Thank you Ilhan you brother fucking maggot fuck. Thank you Dan Crenshaw you one eyed Soi boi pirate fondler.”
Top qeq
LMAYO this comment got me too.
I personally enjoyed brother fucker
Hedgies r fukt.
So fuk.
Thank you AOC for having Trump Won on your Ass all over the internet. Free publicity and a nice butt.
Nah. It’s full of shit.
barfs in Humancent-Ipad
i believe it would be considered beastiality...'cause although im not a veterinarian...i do know a horses ass when i see one
Top kek!! 🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣
Butter face
"Butt
erface"Butt big, choppers for grazing.
I've never seen the "appeal" in that woman. I think just a lot of us are attracted to crazy because of the hint of what it can do under the right circumstances. But to me, AOC looks like the same horse-faced scrawny gint all these WEF "click .exe to install" leaderettes look like. It's like they're all cloned from the same bony bitch.
AOC is a gnawy, ugly beanpole who looks like she'd bite my dick off if I let her near it. I'm not into raw veganism bitches. For me, give me a full bodied (not fat) luxurious woman with all the right turns at all the right places. Strawberry blond, green eyes, some freckles? I'm there :)
Y'all are just stultified by AOC because she's a skinny Latina. You're staring at her like a miracle because besides her there aren't any, lol.
The fuck are you attacking me for? I said it was gross!
Where am I attacking you?
“Y'all are just stultified by AOC because she's a skinny Latina.”
I am not and never was, bucko.
You don’t know where that thing has been
You're right, and I would definitely go as far to say that I do not want to know either.
Madison Cawthorn told us about the orgies.
I still stand by it being a nice butt. But only when it says Trump Won.
Beastiality is a crime.
So is election fraud.
He better keep that patch on. If one of these Afgan goat rapers we keep bringing into our country see his head Sphincter, he'll get skull fucked for sure.
Nah, he was shooting a scene for "Jizz on my Glasses", but he forgot to wear the damn glasses.
Ha!
KEK
Omg truth is so funny sometimes
Interesting ! .... It also stated says - "They shall in all cases, Except Treason , Felony and Breach of Peace, be privileged from arrest during attendance at the session.
I think they committed treason no ? or am I misinterpreting. Just woke up..kek
Surely they've committed felonies
Swallwell and his Chinese spy girl friend comes to mind for treason.
Feinstein too!!! And she is guilty of insider trading as well
Exactly, I was going to mention her name too but I had a brain cloud and couldn’t remember her name.
KEKLARIOUS!
Didn't CONgress exempt themselves from the laws regarding insider trading? They exempt themselves from everything else, I can't really see them overlooking those.
Swallowswell was just using her as his personal chinese spy so he could hang with the rest of the cool traitors in congress.
If they committed treason, then they wouldn't be protected from arrest, so if they're protected from arrest then they did not commit treason.
Edit (for the haters and the losers): https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contraposition
Bonus points to any reader who recognized this as an example of "converse error" in logic.
Determination of whether someone committed treason occurs only after a TRIAL—not after a bureaucratic decision to refrain from arresting someone.
Oh wow, you had me geeking out there for a minute. In college I failed finite math twice. Finally found out that I could get my last math credit by taking Philosophy Logic. So I jumped on it, I hate numbers. Words are my friends. I aced that class and tutored half of it. That must be a left brain/right brain thing.
lol I can't do numbers either and I was able to take some intro to computers class instead of a math class in college and that counted as a math credit.
Same here, fren! Words are my friends. Math, more a frenemy. I had to take college calculus twice. That was painful!
name checks out
Like trying to prove a negative.
I believe the reason for the arrest is on the arrest warrant. The warrant couldn't state something from which they are protected.
Eventually guilt or innocence is irrelevant.
Your analysis of the logical rules is incorrect. I'll define it formally for you:
A => Committed treason
B => Protected from arrest
If: A -> !B
Then: B -> !A
This is the textbook definition of the logical contrapositive. You can absolute conjecture that it's impossible to know A prior to a trial, therefore the conclusion might be wrong, but that's not a "converse error." My application of the rule is correct.
The converse error refers to an incorrect application of a statement's converse, in which a proof states that A -> B, therefore B -> A. That's patently wrong, and also not what I did.
Thank you for the clearing that one up. So let the arrests begin
Arrests can't happen, they're still in session.
Arrests can happen. Even in session. They can be arrested for treason.
We can only hope.
(cue Sesame Street music...) This one thing is not like the other....
Did I interpret the constitution incorrectly? The post seems to indicate that Congress is using an extended session to protect themselves from arrest. If treason is not covered under types of issues protected from arrest, then it would not make sense that they would extend the session to protect themselves from arrest for treason.
It all comes down to who is willing to arrest them?
I think it comes down to that, and also to whether or not the arrest would be legal. If we're willing to commit crimes to arrest criminals, then our laws mean nothing.
(We do have problems with unequal applications of justice, so there's a lot more to talk about on that topic.)
I’d rather see them arrested in live sessions than when on vacation
I’d prefer the 5 am raid Roger Stone style
As long as they get arrested, I don't much care when it is. Though I'd prefer if it was in the act of something.... offensive and compromising. Something even normies can't overlook.
It's not treason! It's trading!
/s
u/#afraid u/#durham u/#mjpopcorn
That Durham one lol
I sure wish people would stop saying congresscritters have "immunity from arrest while in session".
But only because it isn't true.
They CAN BE ARRESTED for treason.
They CAN BE ARRESTED for felonies.
They CAN BE ARRESTED for breach of the peace.
At this point it is safe to say MOST of the Congress is guilty of one or more of these three.
It's probably also safe to say none of them—except Republicans, of course—will ever be arrested for any of their crimes.
But they CAN be.
You can be fake arrested like AOC.
True that, we've heard this same thing last year and the year before that.
12 weeks off per year! Such a deal. Teacher's hours but at 3-4 x the pay.
It's like working 75% of the time and getting paid your full salary (plus tens of millions in kickbacks, bribes, and money laundering proceeds, but these are minor details).
Book deals, too! Although, those could also count as kickbacks.
Plus kickbacks!
… and free adrenachrome.
Plus the raping and pillaging!
They were never meant to make their positions a year-round endeavor. This year-long crime against the people must be exposed along with a great many other things. Their duties and responsibilities are few; the privileges afforded to them to accomplish said duties are just THAT, not rights of any kind. WE, the people, have the rights.
I've read that they're not going to recess until the
America Destruction ActInflation Reduction Act is signed by Resident Dummy today (Tuesday).I wonder how many of them (or relatives and/or friends) will make extra millions from that ridiculous bill?
Enough that that was a main point of the bill!
I need to see if my retirement portfolio manager can invest in a fund that will benefit from it; if you can't beat their fraud, might as well take advantage of it :)
I forget if it is a fund or a person, but it is something like "Pelosi Trades" where they mirror her investments and they do well, for now at least!
Interesting theory. Not to discredit it, but does anybody else have a hard time taking something seriously when there are random capitalized words for no apparent reason and it is riddled with emojis? Maybe just my weird tired brain.
I don't disagree with you or the TS post, I just disagree with the post's formatting. I'm feeling petty today. Have a good day frens!
I feel like that might be talking about me... nah not really, I know That One Guy you're referring to, but I'm totally guilty of it too.
I think it's because of all those days as a try-hard teenager making Xanga and Myspace layouts and backgrounds <b>that I wanted to POP OUT</b> <i>and look super cool.</i>
Sorry I just know where the emphasis is supposed to go and I cant help myself😪 Shame*!*
Ok ok, fine, not random or without reason. Poor linguistics on my part. I know why it is there, it just annoys me today. Barf out syndrome, kek
Shhhhh!
Yeah, I'm the same way. Sometimes I'll start reading an article posted here and the random ALL CAPS makes me re-evaluate how seriously I take the author.
They also do this.
One sentence in one line, for emphasis.
With emojis it's the worst - you may be posting a shocking article on miscarriages after the vax but if your title is emoji-riddled 💉🧬💉👺 (title) 👺💉🧬🔥🔥 - I'll most likely not click on it.
I always feel safer when they are not in session.
They're still in session because they want to do as much damage as possible before they're routed out. I got this email from Senator Bob Casey (D) of Pennsylvania:
"Earlier this month, Senate Democrats capped off a historically productive legislative session with one of the most significant pieces of legislation in modern American history: The Inflation Reduction Act. On Friday, House Democrats passed the bill, sending it to President Biden's desk to be signed into law.
THE INFLATION REDUCTION ACT: LOWERS PRESCRIPTION DRUG COSTS: Medicare will have the authority to negotiate prescription drug prices; Caps out-of-pocket costs for Medicare recipients at $2,000 a year -- EXTENDS ACA HEALTH CARE TAX CREDITS THROUGH 2025: Extends the enhanced premium tax credits created through the American Rescue Plan; Estimated monthly savings for a family of four with a household income of $75,000: $248 -- PUTS THE UNITED STATES ON TRACK FOR CLIMATE GOALS: Hundreds of billions of dollars in tax credits to lower families' energy costs; Will reduce U.S. greenhouse gas emissions by 40% by 2030 -- REDUCES THE DEFICIT AND CREATES JOBS: Lowers the deficit by $305 billion without raising taxes on people making less than $400,000 per year; Creates an estimated 9 million jobs over the next decade
The Inflation Reduction Act will improve lives across the Commonwealth and the Nation. In addition to lowering costs for families who have been squeezed by inflation, this bill may be our last chance to act on the climate crisis before it's too late. And we're going to create new, high-paying American manufacturing jobs in clean energy to do it. It's also a fiscally responsible bill that will bring down our national debt by ensuring the most profitable corporations start paying their fair share, just as American families have been doing all along.
I am proud of all that this Congress has so far accomplished. We've made transformational investments in the U.S. economy and American workers. Between the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, the CHIPS and Science Act, and now the Inflation Reduction Act, we have passed legislation that will boost the economy and create jobs in our infrastructure, supply chain, domestic manufacturing and clean energy sectors.
I look forward to building on these successes and continuing to deliver results for Pennsylvania.
Sincerely,
Bob Casey"
Agreed P.R.!
They have been out of session many times since Trump left the White House. What makes NOW special? If we have been in a State of Emergency for the last 2 years why weren't they arrested when they went out of session previously? What's changed?
To work 95 days out of the year, give yourself pay raises, make side deals with nations to pocket $$, have aids, staff write thousands of pages of bills you don’t know what it entails but just rubber stamp—-what a racket!
Immunity from arrest period. When has a congressional member ever been arrested? I can think of one off the top of my head.
Lets hope the second they gavel it out the entire House is raided and every single dem is placed in cuffs and a good majority of Republicans as well.
This is a great point Fren.
https://www.senate.gov/artandhistory/history/common/generic/News_August_Recess.htm
I can't believe these couple sentences from that link. "By the 1950s the job of a U.S. senator was a full-time, year-round job and there were very few breaks built into the legislative calendar. In 1963, for example, the Senate met from January to December without a break longer than a three-day weekend." Wow, they had to actually work a whole year with nothing longer than a three-day weekend? Cry me a river!
Congress is not in session.
To underscore this:
Biden will deliver remarks and sign the bill, known as the Inflation Reduction Act, at an event in the White House's State Dining Room, the White House announced Monday.
It will likely be a smaller ceremony, with Congress out of session and most members involved in the bill's passage out of town.
That's a ballsy handle.
They have immunity from arrest, with the exception of treason
Yes but they are surrounded. DC is a ghost town all but them and the wonderful warriors waiting for the Go to remove them all.
Maybe because they know it's very likely their "gravy train" is running out of track after the midterm elections.
Dave from x22 mentioned this last night. Interesting
I don’t know… playing bingo?
Was there ever anyone less qualified for President than Kamala? Yes, AOC.
Also POTUS can't make any recess appointments