Win / GreatAwakening
GreatAwakening
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
GreatAwakening Where We Go Qne, We Go All!
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

263
It seems this Q proof was missed. On Nov 1, 2017, Podesta was NOT a senior official. As of Sep 2, 2022, he is. (media.greatawakening.win)
posted 3 years ago by Cat_Anon 3 years ago by Cat_Anon +263 / -0
64 comments download share
64 comments share download save hide report block hide replies
Comments (64)
sorted by:
▲ 20 ▼
– BigDaddy1reboot 20 points 3 years ago +20 / -0

Nice Catch!

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– changeagent 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

I figured I would ask you since you seem to understand... how is this a Q proof? I am really confused about how these proofs work. Do you have a minute to explain? I would appreciate it. Thanks in advance.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 9 ▼
– farpointpatriot 9 points 3 years ago +9 / -0

It’s not a proof. Its kind of a ‘decode’ … pretty good one too.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– changeagent 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

Thanks... but, then what does that mean... a decode?

I guess, why should I be excited about this other than that everyone else is excited so it must mean something good? : )

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 12 ▼
– bombayks 12 points 3 years ago +12 / -0

Very simply, the point is that until now, Podesta has not been a senior govt official. Q posted this in 2017 - how would he have known Podesta would once again hold a senior govt position? That is the "decode" they are referring to.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– changeagent 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0

Ahah... thanks! That makes great sense, now. I appreciate it.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– catsfive 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

OK. If K.C. is "King Charles," Who is K.D.? Or am I not reading that right

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– farpointpatriot 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

There is no KC or KD. Those are likely date markers. If you replace 11.3 with “ KC “ it doesn't make sense grammatically.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– deleted 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0
... continue reading thread?
▲ 3 ▼
– farpointpatriot 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0

Podesta has not been in any capacity as an “Official” until now. This would make a literal interpretation of this statement, now, possible. Think of it like a lawyer. The statement says ”more senior officials”. 1. Others more SENIOR are ALSO OFFICIALS 2. Podesta then legally would have to be an OFFIClAL, which he now is.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– lovecymru 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0

So the military, MI is controlling Biden. He’s not obeying orders from Obama, Soros, DS

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– farpointpatriot 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

What? When did Biden enter the conversation?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– lovecymru 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0

Didn’t Biden select Podesta? He’s going to be in his admin.

permalink parent save report block reply
... continue reading thread?
▲ 2 ▼
– changeagent 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

I appreciate your helpful clarification. Thanks!

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– metapriest 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

Interesting, the grammar is ambiguous tho, it could mean more-senior officials as in officials who are more senior than Podesta, or it could mean more senior-officials, as in, additional senior officials, which implies Podesta is a senior official.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 15 ▼
– MatildaJ 15 points 3 years ago +15 / -0

WOW! I’ve wondered about that line so many times. Well done!!

permalink save report block reply
▲ 11 ▼
– Tewdryg 11 points 3 years ago +11 / -0

Make it so, Number 1.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– Based_in_Space 4 points 3 years ago +4 / -0

Isn’t today or yesterday Star Trek Day? :)

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 14 ▼
– Canadianguy17 14 points 3 years ago +14 / -0

Remember in ST:TNG when the Enterprise comes upon 2 planets in a system. One has a disease, the Phage and the other is trying to help them find a cure and is currently providing them with an inoculation to temporarily stop it ....... THEN......we find out the other planet is actually giving them an inoculation that causes withdrawal symptoms, ie. the phage or the actual problem, which forces them to take another inoculation. They basically created a planet of drug abusers and profited off their decline. Seem familiar?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– farpointpatriot 4 points 3 years ago +4 / -0

Can confirm

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– Based_in_Space 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0

Yes I sort of remember that one. I just started watching TNG again as haven’t watched it since a long time. Lots of themes come up in it that are familiar to our times. And of course one of the frenemies is Q.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Based_in_Space 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

By frenemy I mean in some shows he is antagonist and some he actually helps the Enterprise in a weird way

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– Tewdryg 4 points 3 years ago +4 / -0

Only you with your moniker (Based_in_Space) would get this. 😊

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Based_in_Space 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

:)

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– One_Of_Gods_Soldiers 6 points 3 years ago +6 / -0

Good find!

permalink save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– Patriot_Perks 5 points 3 years ago +5 / -0

This is a big proof

permalink save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– Based_in_Space 4 points 3 years ago +4 / -0

It would be presumed that many VIPswould be traveling to London for the state funeral on 18th. Should we assume that something will happen beforehand or we wait for 11.4? Not sure what 11.4 is but might be time to brush up on it.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– Based_in_Space 6 points 3 years ago +6 / -0

It seems 11.4 could be arrest announcement or the trigger for the arrest

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– tool 4 points 3 years ago +4 / -0

That would be great. The day the Lizardqueen died leaves 114 days left 'till the end of the year... A marker is a marker is a marker. All these numbers, my poor brain.

https://www.timeanddate.com/date/durationresult.html?d1=08&m1=9&y1=2022&d2=31&m2=12&y2=2022

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– youknowthething76 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

I wouldn't assume anything. When has date fagging ever worked?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– RugerP89 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

u/#q26

It's possible that 11.3 = K.C = King Charles, (Not just Kevin Clinesmith).

Applying the same pattern to 11.4, do we know any big name K.D's?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– swimkin 4 points 3 years ago +4 / -0

I would love to see Podesta get taken this year as per Q post. And HRC, too.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– BigFudge69 4 points 3 years ago +4 / -0

LMAO I literally posted about this a few days ago but didn't get recognized because I had a handshake account. Don't believe me? Check what I posted not that long ago 😂

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– deleted 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0
▲ 4 ▼
– RobFromTechServices 4 points 3 years ago +4 / -0

Nice..

permalink save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– Anon_1776 4 points 3 years ago +4 / -0

Pizzagate DECLAS

permalink save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– OkieBowhunter 4 points 3 years ago +4 / -0

Good find! So I guess we're waiting for bad news about Podesta to surface in a rather mainstream kind of way? Could be a while since he just assumed his new role.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– throwawayforyou 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0

Setting the stage

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– CherokeePede 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0

It says certain laws have been pre.lifted. Anyone know what those were?

permalink save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– Cat_Anon [S] 7 points 3 years ago +7 / -0

Some say Trump signed the "insurgency act" on Jan 6. So that would probably be a lot of laws.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– deleted 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0
▲ 3 ▼
– Jacurutu99 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0

I wonder if Podesta had much of a choice for his big promotion or was it more like an assignment? Seems like it would have been much better for him to be as far out of the spotlight as possible.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– bigsix 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0

Possible! But he was Slick Willie's chief of staff. He's was a former official at the time of Q's post.

He was chief of staff to former President Clinton

https://www.axios.com/2022/09/02/biden-john-podesta-clean-energy-spending

permalink save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– deleted 4 points 3 years ago +4 / -0
▲ 2 ▼
– Notimportant81 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

Wasn't it Podesta who Obama prohibited Hillary from bringing into the administration? Remember that meeting where the two made the deal for him first and she would follow? Obama hated Podesta, and wasn't fond of the clintons.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– deleted 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0
▲ 2 ▼
– Notimportant81 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

You're right. I did a search and it may be Blumenthal i am thinking of. I used to follow HillBuzz because they had the best anti Obama research, so I am fairly certain that's where I got the information, and then depended on my memory (I keep forgetting it's not what it was 30 years ago.)

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– dec3169 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

Correct - it was Blumenthal.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Etmb55 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

I seem to remember that was Sidney Blumenthal.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– farpointpatriot 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

You are correct, but it doesn’t say former…it says senior

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– FlyingScotzman 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0

It's a genius trap. Podesta knows it's over. He has no reason to turn down the position Biden has appointed to him to. Podesta will use his power to steal money/do whatever he can, and won't give a crap that Q is watching him.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– CQVFEFE 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

over the course of the next several days

It's assumed he meant years instead of days

Why

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– LBTrumplican2 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

News unlocks.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 2 ▼
– photobuf 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

Does this mean we are getting to the final curtain call?

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– TBIYTCQC 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

"certain laws have been pre-lifted to provide our great military the necessary authority to handle and conduct these operations."

I wonder which laws... anyone?

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– CanuHonk 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

I love you man! Not in the Monkeypox kind of way.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– axiy 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

Genius

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Quato 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

Podestà (pronounced [podeˈsta], English: Potestate, Podesta) was the name given to the holder of the highest civil office in the government of the cities of Central and Northern Italy during the Late Middle Ages.

I've seen some people say it means 'lawyer.' The other definition is minor official. If it means lawyer, in this case, then maybe it means Rudy will be arrested.

Bannon mentioned that the FBI raided 35 Trump allies. It might also mean it's Bannon's arrest, though Bannon is not a lawyer or an official.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Aussie_Lurker 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

11.3 K=11 C=3 King Charlie

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– lamdog220 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

Things are going down

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– AlgaeBanquet 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

Very good!

5 year delta...

Just before the most important elections the USA will ever have?

Would be good timing for all this to occur...

Yeah, datefagging, but it feels like crunch time to me...

permalink save report block reply

Welcome


The Great Awakening


We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.


WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q


Welcome to the Digital Battlefield — Together We Win

Rules


Q Supporters

This is The Great Awakening. Our community is international, focused on helping ourselves and others walk away from the programming, and return our governments to "by the people, for the people!"



Follow the Law

No posts or comments that violate laws in your jurisdiction or the United States. The Feds are always watching!



No Bad Behavior!

No doxing, including revealing personal information of non-public figures, as well as addresses, phone numbers, etc. of public figures. All GAW users must adhere to the highest standards of conduct, whichever .WIN they are on. If we are notified by other moderators of incivil behavior on other .WINs, you WILL be banned here!



Civil Discussion ONLY**

They want you divided.

They want you labeled by race, religion, class, sex, etc.

Divided you are weak [no collective power].

Divided you attack each other and miss the true target [them].



No PAYtriots/No Self Promotion

Linking or promoting merchandise, fundraising, or spamming personal websites, blogs, or channels is not permitted. Do not attempt to profit from Q or advertise for those who do. Peace is the prize. We do it for free.



Questions and Concerns

All moderation questions and concerns should be submitted via modmail. DO NOT GRIEF the mods.



Expand your thinking

Remember, this .WIN is the public face of the Great Awakening, and, as a member here, you agree to represent the Great Awakening movement against Globalism, Communism and Progressive Insanity in the best, most positive way possible. NOTE: Your comments and posts may become news. Keep it classy!

This is not a 'fringe conspiracy' site: Visit https://conspiracies.win if that's your thing!



No doomers or shills

If you can't use common sense, you'll get banned without hesitation. If you're a shill, you fall under this rule. If you're a doomer, you fall under this rule as you just add garbage to the site like the other two. This includes forum sliding.



General Rules

  • Mods will issue NO warnings, followed by temporary bans and/or permanent bans. DO NOT GRIEF THE MODS.

  • Keep posts related to topics Q has raised or that are current.

  • Keep post duplication (especially from other .WINs) to a minimum.

  • HIGH EFFORT, HIGH-INFO posts only! Please respect other readers' time. Please use descriptive titles. No URLs in titles, pls. No clickbait.

  • No fame-fagging; no, "your" post did not get removed! Were you the original author?? Eyes on the prize, people!

  • Memes encouraged, but no low-quality, low-info posts.

  • Keep it honest and accurate.

  • GAW Supporters ONLY. (Sorry, the train had no brakes.)

  • Handshake noobs will be scrutinized by their Q knowledge, sincerity, and respect.

  • Remember, your conduct here represents the Q movement! OUR ENEMIES ARE WATCHING!

  • Please direct all complaints to modmail first!


Resources


WELCOME TO THE DIGITAL BATTLEFIELD


"River of Search" script:


GAW post formatting tips


Q Research (Q only posts at 8kun)


Q post archives (qagg.news) others 1 2 3 4


Browse Drops from the beginning


QProofs.com


Learn to read the Q map


Book of Q Proofs v1.3 (pdf)


Law of War & Majic Eyes Qnly Resources


Trumps twitter archive


POTUS: The Calm Before The Storm


Pedosta and DNC dumps


GIFs & QPosts


Poll Post Format


SPY ON US! See: mod Logs


The Greatest Show on Earth!


New to Q? "The Earth Chronicles Ep 12: Q & The White-Hat Op: What's Real, What's Not?"


Moderators

  • dropgun
  • catsfive
  • AutoMod
  • Filter
  • Fatality
  • Qanaut
  • bubble_bursts
  • Brent75
  • and 8 more...
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026.02.01 - w2qgj (status)

Copyright © 2026.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy