I saw several threads about the flag with no stars at the Trump rally. Many people were saying it was a lighting issue. Bullshit! Most of the people saying it was a lighting issue were shills/handshake accounts.
This flag was Trump's final warning to the deep state, surrender now or feel the pain.
4 U.S. Code § 10 - Modification of rules and customs by President
Any rule or custom pertaining to the display of the flag of the United States of America, set forth herein, may be altered, modified, or repealed, or additional rules with respect thereto may be prescribed, by the Commander in Chief of the Armed Forces of the United States, whenever he deems it to be appropriate or desirable; and any such alteration or additional rule shall be set forth in a proclamation.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/4/10
Did you catch that? The flag can be modified by the Commander in Chief of the Armed Forces of the United States!!!!
There Were No Stars on the Flag at Donald Trump’s Rally. What that Means is..
There were no stars on the flag last night as President Trump entered and exited the stage. For those who don’t know what an American flag without the stars means you have to ask someone whose been in the military. The simple answer is surrender. American flag without the stars tells your enemy that further aggression on their part will mean total annihilation, complete destruction or obliteration, If your the enemy and you choose to surrender you be treated well. President Trump was sending deep state a message.
So Trump was sending the deep state a message, surrender now or you will be obliterated.
At the end of Trump's term, on Dec 8th, 2020, Ezra Cohen Watnick explains the DoD change in special ops forces command structure. Ha explains that it was JFK that predicted a rise in Special Ops forces for a new kind of war.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nmaldemREH8
In the Ghost in the Machine video at the 1:00 minute mark you see the phrase, "You will find us in the shadows", then you see Special Ops team moving in on its target.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VA4e0NqyYMw
At the 1:08 mark you see the phrase, "At the tip of the Spear"
You can see the Special Ops Emblem here. A spear tip.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Special_Operations_Command
Special Operations Forces are involved in various types of missions ranging from combat and counterterrorism operations to hostage rescue and humanitarian aid.
https://www.military.com/special-operations
How will it play out? Here is the main theory.
The 10 days of Darnkess will be a shutdown of the internet and certain communication systems. This will prevent the deep state from communicating with each other. During this time President Trump will be using EBS messages to keep people calm and perhaps give some historical details of the deep state crimes.
The Special Op's teams will begin rounding up deep state targets. 10th Mountain division will assist Special Op forces with transporting captives and maintain peace on the streets of our cities. Captives will be moved to GITMO for very quick military tribunals.
Biden wants to shut Gitmo down, but construction for 9/11 trial ramps up.
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/biden-wants-shut-gitmo-down-construction-9-11-trial-ramps-up
I wonder who will be drug in to this 9/11 trial. Is this the reason for the sad face on Bush Jr at his daddy's funeral?
Catherine Herridge Reports On The Expansion Of Gitmo Despite Biden’s Attempt To Close The Detention Camps
If Biden was really in charge of the military and all his associates were facing military tribunal, don't you think he would shut GITMO down? Nope, he is not in charge. President Trump is controlling the military. He is still our Commander in Chief.
Buy some books for darnkess.
Stay safe my frens!!!
WWG1WGA!!!
All of this makes sense and i see it the same. I believe its close. The jan 6th crap with the fbi, dropping their cases with child trafficking, the constant bombardment of 45 over the MAL files is insanity. This has to be close to the precipice of their ultimate destruction. I still believe the FF is immenent. Dirty bomb is still my guess. Keep your powder dry..
I am thinking this is even bigger: Putin, Xi, and Modi are rarking up a peaceful trade agreement, and it is drawing in the likes of African nations, Venezuela, Iran and Turkey because they are all sick of the Deep State shenanigans.
Agreed. 100%. My only worry is awakening the masses. My personal opinion is most are lost, and theyre not going away. I could be wrong but most dems i know are nuts. Plain and simply. Nuts. The cabal going down is a huuuge step.
The only way to wake Dem voters is for the Dem politicians to reveal their own criminality. They'll get panicky and desperate, then start committing crimes in the open like trying to overthrow the US government.
90% of my friends are crazy libs too, and what I described above is the only way their minds will open. The psy-op media has total control over their thoughts. One of my closest friends has become mentally unstable because of the TDS programmed into his head. I'm honestly scared he'll end up in the 3% to 6% Q said will be lost forever. The media is truly evil.
All the jaboholics are going to be opted out to die, so a fair percentage may well not even exist by 2024... 👀
Maybe they are not so normal.
I can’t wait to see the demonic lions aka the MSM have their mouths shut as did the lions in Daniel’s den. They are one of the most destructive forces in this whole show.
This. The leftists only believe what they believe and think how they think because of the media propaganda. If you fix the media/propaganda problem, then the majority of them will then naturally see the truth and stop parroting propaganda. They are just personality types that FOLLOW. They FOLLOW whatever the mainstream media says because that is where they believe the truth lies. Their sheltered/weak minds cannot fathom the idea of the mainstream media lying to them. Begin showing them the truth through mainstream media and they will eventually begin to FOLLOW that. They are sheep.
Q said 4-6%; IMHO it's 4 + 6%.
The 90% will forge on into the New Dawn.
I believe there are a whole lot more people that have been waken up than we think. They are starting understand that there's some major fuckery going on and that their "conspiracy theory" friends are starting to make sense, they just aren't willing to fully admit it to anyone yet.
Upvoted to 17!
/werdnerd
"For those who don’t know what an American flag without the stars means you have to ask someone whose been in the military. "
Raised in the military, married to the military, never heard of this. Hubby either. This exact line has been going around since Saturday. No sauce.
Other than that, i like your thought process!
My thought as well. Never heard of flag w/o stars. The CoC being able to make regs is a good decode though so I like rest of OP post.
Spent a career in the military. Two kids also served. Nome of us ever heard about it. If true it isn't common knowledge.
Jaun O' Savin explaining the stars.
https://americanmediaperiscope.com/ut-episode-187/
Sounds good except for that there are indeed dark stars on the flag.
Very clear https://media.greatawakening.win/post/a9ghsHrQIrHP.jpeg
I agree. The stars on that flag look black. I've studied several pics of it up close and the stars are DEFINITELY on there, but they're super dark like black - not the same blue as the rectangle section of the flag at all.
Plausible deniability?
That's likely it. PD must always be included.
Good theory.
Optical illusion.
Follow Trumps left shoulder up to the partially lit star.
You can really see the shape of that star but only due to the glare from a light.
It's pretty safe to assume all other stars were like that star and not black.
Lighting issue.
Juan O' Savin in https://americanmediaperiscope.com/ut-episode-187/ shows a close up. The stars are there, but that have been deliberately blacked out (covered over with black cloth). If you see them, it is due to the lighting hitting the edges, because they are slightly 3D.
Could be. I'm starting to think that maybe they got someone to stitch over the already-there stars with dark thread to make it look like the flag had no stars on it.
The star next to Trump's head shows they are indeed in shadows.
Seeing them for the first time, thanks anon.
IMHO the black stars are simply a statement of how bad the country is doing right now as it's dragged down into the toilet by the democrats. Kind of like flying the flag upside down: a statement of distress, rather than "comms" to criminals. They don't give a fuck about any flag.
Just my $.02, I'm happy to be proven mistaken.
👍
Jaun O' Savin explaining the stars.
https://americanmediaperiscope.com/ut-episode-187/
I have heard this repeated many times on telegram and by youtubers. However, I have not come across anything in military code that says this. We need to source this beyond just "military people telling this is what it is"
Jaun O' Savin explaining the stars.
https://americanmediaperiscope.com/ut-episode-187/
Debils Avocado here.
Note: I'm trying to approach this from an objective, critical thinking perspective, and by playing debil's avocado, add some needed (in my view) balance to your often interesting arguments.
This here says display. It does not say that the President can change or alter the US flag at will, or simply by proclamation. IT says he can change the rules and customs around DISPLAY of the flag, not the flag itself.
This is a legal code, and the language is very precise. Lawyers, translators and high-level military administrators will recognize that.
FALSE. See above.
On what basis can you make this claim? Many have seen and pointed out the stars directly. For some, they appear as black stars. For others, as metallic stars but placed into the tapestry at an indent, so that they are shaded from light, etc.
You might assert that the flag gives the impression of no stars, but it's patently false that there are in fact no stars. A no stars flag would have a purely blank section of blue, don't you think?
(Note: kudos for putting out a lot of interesting content and I think your contributions develop the analytical work on the board (something I wish there was a bit more of), but I also think you tend to be rather free and loose with your assertions.)
Eg.g The assertion that the flag is a 'final warning' might be accurate or it might be inaccurate, or just plain wrong. But, how can we assess that unless by application of factual evidence, and reasoned analysis?
In the case of Q, there's a strong tendency for us pedes to tie together assertions in order to shape and develop a theory that fits all the data points, but we shouldn't simply ignore facts if they don't support the theory. If you don't account for contradicting or limiting data points in the theory, there's a real danger of simply leaning into a wishful thinking-type approach.
Case in point. This here is a direct quote from the article written by Constitutional Nobody. It's relevant, surely, that in this case, the author offers NO sauce or references for his assertion. None whatsoever. As anons, striving to apply critical thinking, reason and due diligence, why on earth would we simply accept or use a claim that has no sauce, no references, and (has not been corroborated) by any relevant sources?
In order to flesh out a theory? Yes, sure. But then due diligence requires that one acknowledges that there is no corroborative sauce.
In a theory or idea that knits together a number of different assertions in order to sketch out a vision and conceptualization of what is actually going on, each of those different assertions needs to be tested and questioned. If they stand up to the testing, then you're moving forward. But, if they don't, it's wise to be circumspect. Otherwise, you can easily end up in lala land with ideas and concepts that pull on or appeal to the emotions, but which do not in fact advance overall understanding.
The above points are essentially the real gist of your post here. What follows RE: special ops, etc, although well documented, are essentially tangential points; they don't really have any bearing on the assertion that the flag at the DJT rally was a communication to the Deep State to surrender now or be annihilated.
Nonetheless, your theory about what post Q4414 is interesting. A bit hard to verify, right? Disinfo? Distraction? Why would it be necessary or important for Q to inform the anons, for example, of this framework? Is it possible that this is disinfo to distract and mislead the deep state actors while the real operations are being conducted elsewhere or in a different manner?
Hard to say, right? Likely to be a case of future proves past?
This is a really interesting question. Kudos for putting it out there.
In conclusion, while things are clearly ramping up, I personally think there needs to be a lot more due diligence and verifiable evidence around the idea that the flag at DJT's rally is some sort of comms. It looks like an awesome, tapestry flag that someone put a lot of work into. It's possible that it's being used for that reason.
At any rate, the theories around whether it is comms, and if so, what it means, need to be handled with more logic, evidence and due diligence than simply asserting "most of the people saying it was a lighting issue were shills/handshake accounts". In my opinion.
I love the documentation, but I find you have a propensity to go hard on assertions and theories without really knuckling down or accounting for factual evidence that contradicts those ideas. Remember all the assertions around the Law of War Manual and January 2022? What happened there?
wwg1
I would like some spicy guacamole please
I'll see what I can do.
True , making a ton of links doesn not make a weak assertion valid, especially when presented as THIS IS FACT, FU SHILL if you disagree.....
Are you working as a Snopes fact checker or are you a Biden defense attorney?
Here is a video of Juan O" Savin explaining the flag.
https://americanmediaperiscope.com/ut-episode-187/
Here is another link with a starless flag that claims it represents an occupied US.
https://www.crwflags.com/fotw/Flags/fic%5Eamrk.html#un-us
Juan confirms my post. He also goes into some of the specifics from Law of War and confirms what I was trying to tell you during our last conversation. Juan confirms the one-year rule which you refused to believe.
The Law of War scenario is still in play. It hasn't gone anywhere. What I said with regard to the Law of War is that there was a one year waiting period and that Trump could not take any actions before January 2022 per Geneva Convention international laws.
What I didn't realize back then was the timing of Trump taking the White House back would be controlled by the 22nd Amendment. If Trump takes control before January 20, 2023, he would not be able to run in 2024. If he replaces Biden after that date, he can serve 6 more years.
You analyze every word of my posts to the point you take details out of context. For instance, the "Display" of the flag. The code obviously says "alter and modify" the flag. You change the meaning of the code by inferring its only about the way it gets hung on a wall? So, in essence, you are saying (based on the code) only the President can hang the flag and/or modify its presentation? Only the President can place a rainbow frame around it? I think anyone can do that. I can hang an American flag on anything I chose. I can hang it on my house, put it on my truck or hang from my apple tree. Changing the flag itself is what the code is talking about, sorry you couldn't see that. Your extreme analytical diversions in an attempt to discredit my posts hinders your own arguments most of the time.
I saw the stars, you didn't have to tell me there "were" stars. Standing at a distance you can't see them, I'm sure no one in the audience at a distance could see them. Those were not my words; it was the title of the article. I post the article title that says "No stars" and you have a problem with that? Why? If the man wants to say "No stars" who cares? We know what he is talking about. What did you want him to say....the flag with the dark, hard to see, metal, embroider stars?
I'm not going to sit here and refute every comment from you, I have been down that road with you once before and it got me nowhere.
Obviously, I cannot say for certain how this movie plays out. The best I can do is look at all the pieces, try to make the pieces fit together and make a prediction. If you don't want to partake in my predictions, no offense, keep moving, you are not obligated.
Maybe you have it in your mind, everything we have seen thus far is all normal stuff that happens every day, there is nothing to see here, keep moving. You can think that if you want and you can try to convince us all we are tin foil hat wearing conspiracy theorists, but you will look foolish.
I don't mind criticism at all, hammer away. The Snope's fact checker and I have a history. There was a post from a while back that he and I went back and forth on for a week or so. He was trying to deny something that was written in the Law of War manual and there have been several instances since then.
Yes, I saw the stars, I know the stars were there, but they were hidden to anyone who wasn't standing near the flag. If you look at the flag from the audience or from the broadcast video it appears there are no stars and that is the point. The appearance of no stars is what being displayed to the general population. It wasn't a lighting issue; they were intentionally covered with a blue veil or darkened to make them appear to be gone.
The title of the USSA article said, "No Stars" and it has been used as an adjective since then when talking about the subject. So yes, I saw the stars, we know they were there however there was an attempted effort by the Trump team to make the stars appear to be gone and it wasn't by accident, it had meaning.
I have a completely different view. Let me fix this for you: "He was trying to deny or object to my interpretations of what is written in the Law of War manual."
I made no attempt to deny what is written in the Law of War Manual. What I challenged was YOUR interpretation of what it means.
You seem to be unable to distinguish between your own interpretations and the words themselves.
Please make an effort to distinguish between objective facts on one hand and your own theories and interpretations on the other. Between what is written as opposed to what you think what is written means.
Your theories re: the L.O.W. manual are interpretations. They are what you think it means. What you think it means is not necessarily what it means. Unless you are infallible. And neither of us is infallible.
This is not a fact. This is your theory.
Do you ever consider that you might be wrong? Or is that simply impossible?
"we know they were there ... however there was an attempted effort by the Trump team to make the stars appear to be gone and it wasn't by accident, it had meaning"
This is your theory. It's not a fact. A theory can be right or it can be wrong. It can also be partly right and partly wrong.
Theories require proof. But treating a theory as if it is a fact simply because one is convinced of it, that's not rational or reasonable.
It says the flag is "fictional" (exact words) for a TV show called Amerika, and it doesn't mean "Surrender!", it means the US is occupied. It's entirely possible he's referencing the TV show to allude to us being occupied, but this is different from what you're claiming.
Yes, I understand all of that. That starless flag was created for the movie back in 2010. You have to wonder if was created to have meaning today. The "Fall of London" movie was made 6 years, 6 months, 6 days prior to the Queens death. You see where I am going?
The bottom line is Trump and his people are not stupid. They would have been very aware of the optics of the flag displayed and therefore the appearance of missing stars is intentional. Why is the question.
And this 👆 is the whole point, the only question. Trump doesn’t do anything at a rally that doesn’t have meaning. I happen to hope that this post is accurate. Otherwise, why were the stars clearly affected? There’s a reason…..
I agree
There are no "10 days of darnkess". It's
Two separate sentences and lines, no "of".
This sounds ridiculous on so many levels. Wtf do the stars have to do with sending a "warning" to deep state to surrender? Even if there was a slight chance that that was true why the hell would Trump telegraph a warning and tip them off to if or when he was going to take action against them somehow? That goes against everything Trump has ever said about maintaining silence and to never tip off the enemy. Unless you can show that this is an actual thing in the military not just some stupid article by some trust me bro source I'm calling bullshit on this.
Jaun O' Savin explaining the stars.
https://americanmediaperiscope.com/ut-episode-187/
I'm so sick of this gatekeeping. Not everyone who disagrees with you is a shill/doomer. There are also new people just giving their own honest opinions. Handshake does not equal shill.
Yeah. Critical thinking=shill is tiresome. The whole point of the Great Awakening is for people to think for themselves and this herd mentality, 'us vs them', is getting old, fast.
Yes. I found it in a post comment and then posted it myself. It was from the Alaska rally.
https://greatawakening.win/p/15Jn1tgslz/the-stars-are-not-black--they-ar/c/
How is the deep state supposed to know what it means?
The deepstate is well aware of the coms being sent out and they are well aware of the meanings of those coms.
What if the only message is "The state of our UNION (meaning nation, or field of stars) is pretty dark right now, but we'll soon bring it into the light"
Deep state are always watching him and I'm sure some of them are ex military, they would know what it means.
Plus, we have posts like this for the lurkers.
Well me too if I miss my NFL games! :)
But yes if the internet is shutdown that will cause a massive rage.
Incel rage.... lmao. You got me. Hahaha
u/#wrong
There are stars on the flag. The stars are white. They look dark/black because they are embroidered and backlit.
This is not a flag with no stars. It's not a flag with black stars.
https://greatawakening.win/p/15Jn1tgslz/the-stars-are-not-black--they-ar/c/
It was the title to the article, I saw the stars, I guess I should have left the title to the article out of my post?
It was not merely in the title.
There is no there there. The flag was not a cryptic sign. It's just an incidental lighting effect. It's not Trump/Q saying "This is your last chance to surrender, deep state!" If it were, he wouldn't have used it at two different rallies. One would have been enough. Likewise, he could just say it outright in his speech instead of using weird back lighting tricks.
Sincerely,
A non-shill, non-handshake account
That wasnt the part you should have left out.......
"The 10 days of Darnkess will be a shutdown of the internet and certain communication systems. This will prevent the deep state from communicating with each other. During this time President Trump will be using EBS messages to keep people calm and perhaps give some historical details of the deep state crimes.
The Special Op's teams will begin rounding up deep state targets. 10th Mountain division will assist Special Op forces with transporting captives and maintain peace on the streets of our cities. Captives will be moved to GITMO for very quick military tribunals."
If this plays out like this, I'm going to eat my hat.
God bless!
Fuck the deep state… no deals… kill them all
“That’s the spirit !”
I could see the stars though. Maybe it's like the white/gold dress Vs. blue/black dress controversy.
Or I'm a handshake shill. Shaking hands and shilling for shekels!
Same here. When there’s nothing there, there’s nothing there. The lighting sucked and that’s it. It wasn’t a sign, this isn’t the darkness and this is just a theory that we need to shrug about and move along.
Then explain why the white stripes look brilliant white, while the white stars look coal black.
High quality flags are made differently than the Chinese garbage mass-produced ones. Stripes on the flag are strips of fabric, while the stars are embroidered in white thread on dark blue fabric. You can do this experiment yourself at home with fabric, thread, and back lighting.
Excellent explanation and much appreciated!
Except there were stars………
Oh my God, please tell me this is happening.
I read that this meaning pertains to a flag with the top 2 corners covered, like triangles
Yes !
Great digs anon!
However, from the text of the code.....
"any such alteration or additional rule shall be set forth in a proclamation."......
Did this happen anywhere?
Note also from the code, it refers changes to the rules and customs of DISPLAY of the flag, not the flag itself. A flag with no stars would not be the US flag, but something else.
THE FLAG HAD STARS!
They were embroidered, but the flag was BACK LIT.
So you couldn't see them in certain photos, but they were there.
The flag was backlit because GEOTUS walked up behind it and his shadow was cast on it.
It was for dramatic effect.
Other pics show the flags stars
u/#correct
Right, if you got up close you could see them but to most people it looked blank.
This doesn't explain the whiteness of the stripes
The stripes aren't embroidered. They are thin polyester
One minor point
This uneven article seems to contradict itself and leave questions unanswered. Stars don't represent states. Then a little further down, each star does represent a state. WTH?
This seems fishy. We should be making the enemy think they are facing total annihilation, destruction and obliteration every second of every day they are engaged in battle against the Republic of United States of America (my new branding for the nation, hope no one minds :)
Maybe someone from the military can confirm the no-stars meaning
If you were approached to take part in a belligerent occupation and said "yeah, that sounds like a good idea" announce yourself now and make sure you do so as loud as possible. You will be met there. It's the law of war and you will be met in whichever direction you wish to proceed in.
Last call
I am sick of this bullshit offering them a chance to surrender. We are way beyond that. Annihilating the deep state is the only solution. No more offerings of a way out. No more offerings of surrender. It is a time for decisive action against these traitors.
Internet going down for 10 days means no food delivery's, no fuel, possibly no power, no cell service. This needs to be done BEFORE winter sets in to lessen the impact on people. Just make sure you have food,water, a generator, and plenty of fuel. Also keep all your cars filled with gas! FYI every home has a supply of water it's called your hot water heater that holds around 50 gallons of drinkable water! 10 days will not be fun but we can get through it.
No disrespect but what’s so special about the 10th mountain. I always see them assisting. I know it’s a very special group going back to WWII. But curious to see if someone knows more than Wikipedia.
I can remember stumbling onto a site years ago that had the flags of the 10 (my recollection is it was 10) flags of the patron families of the Roman Empire.
What was a big shock is that one of the flags was, with one tiny exception, IDENTICAL to our red, white, and blue, stars and stripes flag.
The one exception was that in the place of white stars in the blue box at the top left, were white fleur-de-lis in their place.
IMO it Trump was definitely sending a message to someone, but it's hard to decode just whom or what.
From Google search: What does the fleur-de-lis symbolize? Image result for fleur de lis The lily was said to have sprung from the tears shed by Eve as she left Eden. From antiquity it has been the symbol of purity and was readily adopted by the Roman Catholic church to associate the sanctity of Mary with events of special significance.
So likely some message to the Pope or Vatican, as their symbols are blackened.
And sorry, no sauce, as it has been many years ago.
Old ass news why a sticky