Western civilization put an end to human sacrifices in Africa and Mesoamerica. Interesting how history proves the lives of the natives improved with western Christian influence, but no credit is given to Christian’s for putting an end the rituals and senseless savagery.
Worse yet, that they don’t recognize that it isn’t their right to get others who disagree with baby murder to subsidize costs.
They conveniently leave that detail out while claiming “health care.” They are not only filthy moloch worshippers, but controlling and manipulative psychopaths.
Yes. The area is about half Christian and a fourth Muslim, including the Falani and Boko Haram. Juju is still around and also in the New World, brought by slaves. The quote seems odd to me, 1897 was about when the French took over what used to be Dahoumy and is now Benin, but could be due to differences of borders.
Russia and the United States used to be BFF. It wasn’t until the communist revolt and the murder of the Royal family that the United States and Russia started to part ways. Allied against nazi germany for a common interest. Russia aided us in our war of independence and Russia also aided us during the civil war. Russia was our greatest ally for nearly 100 years. With Putin and Trump both in charge that is the closest to what it used to be we have ever been.
We don’t know the complete stories of who did what. This is why I believe they history is suppose to be used to aid us in our decisions for the future.
To tell me that the west is responsible for all the greatness in the world. That’s over selling a narrative to me.
Typically the truth is some where in the middle.
I would say the truth is a combination of various cultures around the world contributed to what we have now.
Russian culture is western culture sir. The Tzar was an emperor and his rule was the likes of western kingdoms. Compare Imperial Russia to China, or Japan. Which one is more like the western kingdoms at the time ? Russia.
It's a data point. But this is a data point based on someone who was there and has no apparent reason to lie about what he saw. Skepticism is one thing. To simply reject new information because it doesn't align with your preconceived notions is itself a logical fallacy.
If you're going to reject the data, why are you rejecting this data? Is the author a liar? Do you have other contemporary sources that describe a different situation?
Is says "1951, Rogers took a giant step closer to achieving his original objective for the Institute by creating a separate sister organization called the American Universities Field Staff (AUFS). Supported by the Ford and Rockefeller Foundations and the membership fees of as many as 20 US colleges, "
Yet another pissing match over who is the morally superior culture.
"Look! Your pile of skulls is higher than our pile of skulls! Therefore muh whites are muh saviors!"
Christian influence. A sword that cuts both ways, literally. Christendom = a particular church dogma is enforceable by the state weilding the sword. So you get the moral tidying up of society, and at the same time the destroying of the individual conscience and liberty of thought. Thank God Martin Luther began the Great Unravel, for all his warts.
The same in India when the British arrived, they put a stop to Suttee, the rite where a widow was burnt alive when her husband died, she was burnt on the same pyre as her husbands corpse.
This was already posted on GAW before by several commenters. Headline from the Daily Mail UK on Don Lemon being schooled:
"CNN host is stunned into silence when royal commentator says African kings - not British royals - should pay reparations for slavery because 'THEY rounded up their own people and had them waiting in cages on the beaches'"
Thomas Sowell does an excellent job of explaining this in more detail. Most white europeans were literally scared to death to venture any further into Africa than the coast for risk of catching any of the many deadly diseases for which they had no immunity against. Therefore, they were entirely dependent on the native population to sell out their own people to them for profit.
The more things change, the more they stay the same.
His-Stories are written by those who know they will never be called out, and also the winners. So yea. Brittain was like "say they are savages" So we can invade yea? Tea and crumpetts and all that toute le floute.
I do often wonder what the "savages" think of us here in the western world. Where we are all guttonous consumers. Who human sacrifice more of a population than they ever could (legally at that woo planned parenthood). We are vain and cruel towards eachother. We rape and attack eachother on the streets. Post it live on facebook and the tiktok.........But yea man. Those savages really were brutal eh?
No one is saying modern culture is perfect or not without its own atrocities. But we're not here to compare civilizations. We're simply talking about facts. Cannibalism, sacrifices, torture - these were actual happenings in tribal societies. It's just the facts - whether you like it or not.
So your argument is that they made all this up as justification for their acts. But the thing is, they were going to take possession of resources regardless, and I don't think they needed to invent a propaganda campaign to defend their behavior - the British were not concerned with their actions or how they appeared on the Word stage so to speak, as the British Empire was ruling the world. They had no one they had to sway to their side. There is plenty of evidence that cannibalism, torture, sacrifice were all part of these tribal societies - but it was also part of tribal societies in other continents. It's not exclusive to Blacks. The problem with this post is it seems to be trying to paint a picture that Black are inherently proposed to this behavior, which of course is nonsense. We had incredibly advanced societies in Africa and all over the world. But also, there have been incredibly violent societies too. I'm simply saying there was an abundance of evidence that points to the reality of these tribal behaviors.
And I am not trying to say Africa was the land of sunshine and rainbows either. In my opinion it was a bit of both. Greed for resources, and also savage as fuck.
I am stating for the "authors and expeditions" Alot were paid for by the Kings of the time. They sent scouts to check other lands for resources. Which is likely why they embellished the savagery. To "dehumanize" them to the public. To make them "heathens, infidels, cannibals" All the labels used to portray someone they want invaded.
Good counter....where was I wrong????? Or you just wanna trade zingers back and forth? Have ANYTHING constructive to add? And maybe if you dont...maybe you should start smoking.......maybe help you think critically if you dont see the shit I mentioned.
What proves they were used for slayings? The white guys who were paid by Royalty to go there and scout resources? Or the tribal translators? I am not denying some crazy Magick happens in Africa. But not everything is Magick....sometimes a mask is a mask. Sometimes terms used by localities have no translation. Especially to this language of spells we currently use.
Yeah, I started reading that book but it started with an expose about the black man’s physical characteristics that make him baneful. It mentions his backwards-facing brain, also.
It seems like a book made to drive a predetermined point - a point that black men are not men and thus available for slavery like an ox. It was hard to read.
Your emotions stopped you from trying to understand the mindset of someone you would disagree with on certain points, so that you never got to understand the primary point?
The South Africa that was run by White British people from decades ago, or the South Africa today that is run by brutal black people who steal from and kill White people for purely racial reasons?
Do you REALLY think those blacks living there today would NOT kidnap their fellow black man and sell him into slavery if he thought he could gain a financial benefit?
Go back a few hundred years to the mentality they had back then, and it is not a difficult concept to grasp.
My favorite quote from the book is something like "I wish those liberal people of London would be forced to spend just one day in Africs to see how it really is!" (Written 150 years ago)
This is the future the elites want for your children:
The slaves know that they can leave their masters if they wish, but they have no other place to go. Some have been in slavery for so many generations that they have no idea from which village they were taken.
^^^On the head. That is the purpose of mass importation of immigrants and the dumbing down of American children. Ask them what their Constitutional Rights are and how they enforce them and you get a blank stare. This is what the elites want while they try to secretly remove those same rights before people figure it out and tar and feather them or worse.
Wow that is crazy i knew it was bad but never read things from that era.
I remember reading a thread on reddit of all places a while back that was talking about the aid workers over there and how after a while they became disillusioned as nothing they did worked and they always went back to being savages.
They built them a irrigation system so they could stop eating dirt and instead grow real food, then they went back a while later and found that they had stripped the farm of everything of value and sold it so they could buy alcohol.
Watch also "empire of dust" its about a chinese railway company trying to make things work in the Congo.
Phoenician navy as facilitator, finding ways to pass the buck by mentioning the other Half of slave trading.
That was the 'racist' side. If it wasn't part racism, then why all the trouble to go find the dark meat to do the dirty work?
People weren't just put into cages to wait for whoever comes along.
That isn't slavery. That's selling captives. The slavery part was on the receiving side.
The African's sin was about greed, competition and conquest of land.
Hell they were tribal, which is more exclusive than 'racism'.
Other tribes were usually their enemies or competitors.
'Arab' (so-called) traders paid one tribe to decimate another and take their land.
The same was attempted with American natives.
Greed is the enemy and slavery is the result.
Descendants of slaves should focus whatever ire they have towards the proper sub-group who were most responsible.
Do research on slave ships.........what special interest group owned 90 percent of them?
So.......who were the originators of the plan? Those who could make it happen.
This needs to be brought to the MSM for everyone to see/hear. I was a toddler at the time and this is the first I heard of this. The cruelty is horrific. Sacrifices still go on today in the name of voodoo and satanism/satanic rituals.
Did Western imperialism bring some good to the "savages"? Certainly. Christianity. Technological advancement. Prosperity (at least for some). Some individuals and organizations genuinely had noble intentions to help. Missionaries often started at such levels, but then unfortunately opened the doors for political entities with less than philanthropic goals.
Global imperialist fucks are often just as barbaric as the savages they aim to subdue and exploit. The difference is that the imperialist paints himself as being morally superior to the brutes they demonize, despite engaging in comparable behavior, albeit in a sophisticated manner.
A great book comparing and contrasting the eventual imperialism of the US to that of the European Empires, specifically in the Middle East, is "Power, Faith and Fantasy." Excellent historical review exploring the duality of these gray areas.
David E Reed arrived in Kenya in 1953 during the Mau Mau uprising. A time of horrific barbarity, one of the most inglorious episodes in British imperial history. A dying empire violently lashed out at its attackers in its weakness. He describes events that ignited that barbarity.
Look at the website from the author of this letter.
It says
"1951, Rogers took a giant step closer to achieving his original objective for the Institute by creating a separate sister organization called the American Universities Field Staff (AUFS). Supported by the Ford and Rockefeller Foundations and the membership fees of as many as 20 US colleges, "
Western civilization put an end to human sacrifices in Africa and Mesoamerica. Interesting how history proves the lives of the natives improved with western Christian influence, but no credit is given to Christian’s for putting an end the rituals and senseless savagery.
63,000,000 abortions since RvW
Matthew 7:3-5
The fact that no one recognizes this as human sacrifice is appalling.
Worse yet, that they don’t recognize that it isn’t their right to get others who disagree with baby murder to subsidize costs.
They conveniently leave that detail out while claiming “health care.” They are not only filthy moloch worshippers, but controlling and manipulative psychopaths.
Do you think abortion would have been legalized had the United States remained a mostly Christian nation? Answer is in the question.
Why don't you say it? "If it weren't for Jewish influence in politics."
Because is not Jewish” in the sense of a actual meaning.
Are the democrats democratic ?
Thanks for the mohel preserving point, Rabbi.
lol okay, whatever
He knows the nose.
Look what the Egyptians were doing to the Israelites babies. They took them once they were born.
Huh? No, they ordered the Jewish midwives to kill the male babies who were born.
Right, the Egyptians had the Israelite babies taken once they were born...
Yes. The area is about half Christian and a fourth Muslim, including the Falani and Boko Haram. Juju is still around and also in the New World, brought by slaves. The quote seems odd to me, 1897 was about when the French took over what used to be Dahoumy and is now Benin, but could be due to differences of borders.
So we are suppose to take the reports from the West at Face value?
I don't understand this logic.
Western culture civilized mankind. Christianity freed them from Tyrants.
That's one perspective.
Look at Putin's perspective on the west. Other countries see us differently.
There is a reason why.
Russia and the United States used to be BFF. It wasn’t until the communist revolt and the murder of the Royal family that the United States and Russia started to part ways. Allied against nazi germany for a common interest. Russia aided us in our war of independence and Russia also aided us during the civil war. Russia was our greatest ally for nearly 100 years. With Putin and Trump both in charge that is the closest to what it used to be we have ever been.
My point is simple.
We don’t know the complete stories of who did what. This is why I believe they history is suppose to be used to aid us in our decisions for the future.
To tell me that the west is responsible for all the greatness in the world. That’s over selling a narrative to me.
Typically the truth is some where in the middle.
I would say the truth is a combination of various cultures around the world contributed to what we have now.
No culture is perfect.
Russian culture is western culture sir. The Tzar was an emperor and his rule was the likes of western kingdoms. Compare Imperial Russia to China, or Japan. Which one is more like the western kingdoms at the time ? Russia.
Let's make something clear here.
What is "Culture" to you?
Are you talking about clothing styles and languages?
Explain to me the major differences so I can understand what you are referring to.
It's a data point. But this is a data point based on someone who was there and has no apparent reason to lie about what he saw. Skepticism is one thing. To simply reject new information because it doesn't align with your preconceived notions is itself a logical fallacy.
If you're going to reject the data, why are you rejecting this data? Is the author a liar? Do you have other contemporary sources that describe a different situation?
I work with data.
What do you mean have no reason to lie?
You are joking right???
The Cabal (Rockefeller) are into causing racial tension. It’s a MAJOR part of their motto dude.
Do you not see the Cabal making up lies about White racism? How many false reports have their been??? They want a racial war.
They need to make us believe we should hate each other.
You do know they are EVIL right?
I am not saying it’s not true: I am saying this guy got funding from the Rockerfellers.
Yes.. I do think they would make up a fake report. They are already doing it are they not ????
How many "Climate Scientists" has said that Global Warming is a MAJOR issue???
They have no reason to lie right?
They also reported they found "Weapons of Mass Destruction"??
Wasn't that bullshit to???
You know.. .Those savage Iraq people are creating WMD's!!!
My reason is simple.
This is the same West that is
WHAT ELSE HAVE THEY BEEN LIEING ABOUT???
Yes.. they totally would make up a fake report about savage blacks to discredit black people.
WHY??? Because they are fucking sick!!!
I just did a quick research into the author "Walter Rodgers".
If you read about him here "https://www.icwa.org/about/history/"
Is says "1951, Rogers took a giant step closer to achieving his original objective for the Institute by creating a separate sister organization called the American Universities Field Staff (AUFS). Supported by the Ford and Rockefeller Foundations and the membership fees of as many as 20 US colleges, "
Do you see the name "ROCKERFELLER"!!!!!
You cannot trust history, my friend.
Think of it this way.
There are 7 billion people on the planet.
That means one giant storyline is playing out as we speak online. That means billions of perspectives are being generated each second.
No way in hell can history tell the complete picture of what happened.
Too many variables and data points are dynamically changing second by second.
I wrote in another thread.
History is not supposed to be trusted. It's supposed to be a tool used to help us become wiser in future decision-making.
That's it.
What is truth?
Every storyline is like a data cube with 6 sides. Each storyline can have multiple cubes.
In database analytical processing. We have "pivot" tables.
This means we can turn data on various sides of a cube to get a different perspective.
This is why most articles are only summaries of one perspective at a time.
So this is why it's important to take in various perspectives to use as guides to make furture decisions.
Yet another pissing match over who is the morally superior culture.
"Look! Your pile of skulls is higher than our pile of skulls! Therefore muh whites are muh saviors!"
Christian influence. A sword that cuts both ways, literally. Christendom = a particular church dogma is enforceable by the state weilding the sword. So you get the moral tidying up of society, and at the same time the destroying of the individual conscience and liberty of thought. Thank God Martin Luther began the Great Unravel, for all his warts.
Western culture civilized mankind. Christianity freed them from Tyrants.
We wuz Kangz!
Dindu Country!
Native’s were chimpin out
Unfortunately this letter, if historically truthful, spotlights stereotypes that have more to do with no Christ vs know Christ.
Jesus saved us all- all 12 tribes. Whatever cannanites were, they rejected the church and thus practiced the ways of the occult.
It seems within reason that the land of Cannan was Africa.
The land of Canaan is in modern day Palestine/Israel. It was the "promised land" where God led the Hebrews when He rescued them up out of Egypt.
It's not a "stereotype" if it's true.
Stereotypes only exist because of truth..so we agree.
We wuz Cain's....
The same in India when the British arrived, they put a stop to Suttee, the rite where a widow was burnt alive when her husband died, she was burnt on the same pyre as her husbands corpse.
Definitely checks out!
This was already posted on GAW before by several commenters. Headline from the Daily Mail UK on Don Lemon being schooled:
"CNN host is stunned into silence when royal commentator says African kings - not British royals - should pay reparations for slavery because 'THEY rounded up their own people and had them waiting in cages on the beaches'"
Thomas Sowell does an excellent job of explaining this in more detail. Most white europeans were literally scared to death to venture any further into Africa than the coast for risk of catching any of the many deadly diseases for which they had no immunity against. Therefore, they were entirely dependent on the native population to sell out their own people to them for profit.
The more things change, the more they stay the same.
The real Wakanda.
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://archive.org/download/negroesinnegrola00helpiala/negroesinnegrola00helpiala.pdf&ved=2ahUKEwjP6fro0Mv6AhW0AjQIHbtHAd0QFnoECBUQAQ&usg=AOvVaw2rEpRlRDdXbIbjUmeTeggV
This book contains hundreds of short descriptions of Africa from explorers in the 1800s. It was really worse than you could ever imagine.
His-Stories are written by those who know they will never be called out, and also the winners. So yea. Brittain was like "say they are savages" So we can invade yea? Tea and crumpetts and all that toute le floute.
Britain was right. They were savages.
Honesty is the best policy. He shouldn’t have self-censored. He could’ve saved the world much damage.
I do often wonder what the "savages" think of us here in the western world. Where we are all guttonous consumers. Who human sacrifice more of a population than they ever could (legally at that woo planned parenthood). We are vain and cruel towards eachother. We rape and attack eachother on the streets. Post it live on facebook and the tiktok.........But yea man. Those savages really were brutal eh?
No one is saying modern culture is perfect or not without its own atrocities. But we're not here to compare civilizations. We're simply talking about facts. Cannibalism, sacrifices, torture - these were actual happenings in tribal societies. It's just the facts - whether you like it or not.
And I am stating. If you scout an area, and you see a wealth of natural resources. And you want them for YOUR OWN country........what would you do?
Say that "the savages" eat eachother! Oh heavens me...."we must bring them God's words"......#invaded.
So your argument is that they made all this up as justification for their acts. But the thing is, they were going to take possession of resources regardless, and I don't think they needed to invent a propaganda campaign to defend their behavior - the British were not concerned with their actions or how they appeared on the Word stage so to speak, as the British Empire was ruling the world. They had no one they had to sway to their side. There is plenty of evidence that cannibalism, torture, sacrifice were all part of these tribal societies - but it was also part of tribal societies in other continents. It's not exclusive to Blacks. The problem with this post is it seems to be trying to paint a picture that Black are inherently proposed to this behavior, which of course is nonsense. We had incredibly advanced societies in Africa and all over the world. But also, there have been incredibly violent societies too. I'm simply saying there was an abundance of evidence that points to the reality of these tribal behaviors.
And I am not trying to say Africa was the land of sunshine and rainbows either. In my opinion it was a bit of both. Greed for resources, and also savage as fuck.
I am stating for the "authors and expeditions" Alot were paid for by the Kings of the time. They sent scouts to check other lands for resources. Which is likely why they embellished the savagery. To "dehumanize" them to the public. To make them "heathens, infidels, cannibals" All the labels used to portray someone they want invaded.
There's gold in them there hills... and also blood thirsty heathens
And were any of you there to claim this is FACT? I mean the British have a track record but let's believe everything they claim about "history" 🤦♀️🔫
So white people arent getting abortions? White Satanists aren't trying to have abortion protected as a Religious rite, right now???
they are, not in numbers anywhere near the black have though
Umm ... those are BLACK people who do that.
Yes, they were. Some still are.
Smoke another one.
Good counter....where was I wrong????? Or you just wanna trade zingers back and forth? Have ANYTHING constructive to add? And maybe if you dont...maybe you should start smoking.......maybe help you think critically if you dont see the shit I mentioned.
Go ask them.
Enjoy.
They still are savage.
So all the artifacts used for ritualistic slayings, death masks, etc. were made up?
What proves they were used for slayings? The white guys who were paid by Royalty to go there and scout resources? Or the tribal translators? I am not denying some crazy Magick happens in Africa. But not everything is Magick....sometimes a mask is a mask. Sometimes terms used by localities have no translation. Especially to this language of spells we currently use.
Evidence - evidence proves it.
Oh, this is really easy.
According to your "logic," since YOU personally were not there, then NO slavery ever happened in the history of the world.
Problem solved.
Thats not what I am stating. But we are giving a pass to the British based off the people they paid for the stories.
Thats all I am saying. Savagery is based solely on the eyes of the ones writing the story.
Look at my other post about "what would the savages think" about us here now in the west.
Slavery happened for sure, still is to this day.
No one is denying this.
"Exterminate all the Brutes."
Yeah, I started reading that book but it started with an expose about the black man’s physical characteristics that make him baneful. It mentions his backwards-facing brain, also.
It seems like a book made to drive a predetermined point - a point that black men are not men and thus available for slavery like an ox. It was hard to read.
Your emotions stopped you from trying to understand the mindset of someone you would disagree with on certain points, so that you never got to understand the primary point?
Here ... have another soy milk.
Not a bad point but do you have any actual information that would at least hint this to a possibility?
South Africa being mainly British...seems proof enough.
The South Africa that was run by White British people from decades ago, or the South Africa today that is run by brutal black people who steal from and kill White people for purely racial reasons?
Do you REALLY think those blacks living there today would NOT kidnap their fellow black man and sell him into slavery if he thought he could gain a financial benefit?
Go back a few hundred years to the mentality they had back then, and it is not a difficult concept to grasp.
Don't leave out the Dutch and Germans, who were there first.
My favorite quote from the book is something like "I wish those liberal people of London would be forced to spend just one day in Africs to see how it really is!" (Written 150 years ago)
Good Lord, now I understand (too well) why that continent never grew a culture or civilization.
Why invest in your community, when they could just sacrifice you? Truly, there is no rest for a people such as those.
This is the future the elites want for your children:
"I could have freed more slaves, if only I could have convinced them that they were slaves." -- Harriet Tubman
There are many psychological experiments that support this idea.
Combination of Stockholm syndrome and the natural tendency to fear change and the unknown.
This take on the Ten Commandments alludes to that point as well.
^^^On the head. That is the purpose of mass importation of immigrants and the dumbing down of American children. Ask them what their Constitutional Rights are and how they enforce them and you get a blank stare. This is what the elites want while they try to secretly remove those same rights before people figure it out and tar and feather them or worse.
Mayans had slavery, too.
Full letter: http://www.icwa.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/DER-42.pdf
Wow that is crazy i knew it was bad but never read things from that era.
I remember reading a thread on reddit of all places a while back that was talking about the aid workers over there and how after a while they became disillusioned as nothing they did worked and they always went back to being savages. They built them a irrigation system so they could stop eating dirt and instead grow real food, then they went back a while later and found that they had stripped the farm of everything of value and sold it so they could buy alcohol.
Watch also "empire of dust" its about a chinese railway company trying to make things work in the Congo.
Welcome to the modern day "education system."
We teach you what WE want you to believe, and nothing more.
Phoenician navy as facilitator, finding ways to pass the buck by mentioning the other Half of slave trading.
That was the 'racist' side. If it wasn't part racism, then why all the trouble to go find the dark meat to do the dirty work?
People weren't just put into cages to wait for whoever comes along. That isn't slavery. That's selling captives. The slavery part was on the receiving side.
The African's sin was about greed, competition and conquest of land.
Hell they were tribal, which is more exclusive than 'racism'. Other tribes were usually their enemies or competitors.
'Arab' (so-called) traders paid one tribe to decimate another and take their land.
The same was attempted with American natives.
Greed is the enemy and slavery is the result.
Descendants of slaves should focus whatever ire they have towards the proper sub-group who were most responsible.
Do research on slave ships.........what special interest group owned 90 percent of them?
So.......who were the originators of the plan? Those who could make it happen.
Hint, check out Newport RI. Oldest synagogue and established Jewish community in the United States.
He knows the nose.
This needs to be brought to the MSM for everyone to see/hear. I was a toddler at the time and this is the first I heard of this. The cruelty is horrific. Sacrifices still go on today in the name of voodoo and satanism/satanic rituals.
Fucking animals.
Ahh.. more name calling!
Did you read what was written? How would you describe those engaged in that?
The article came from a guy that got funded by Rockerfellers.
That's the Cabal dude.
So I withhold judgment.
Are you telling me I should Trust someone that is funded by the Rockerfellers?
The kings of LIEING!!!!
Should have left them to it
"Noble savages" = myth
But white people are the problem! Them and their evil colonization! Things were so much better before!
But I heard they were kings and shit.
dey wUz kAaAnGz
Mud walls n shiiieeet
The reason the locals object to Western imperialism was that it interfered with their own imperialism.
Did Western imperialism bring some good to the "savages"? Certainly. Christianity. Technological advancement. Prosperity (at least for some). Some individuals and organizations genuinely had noble intentions to help. Missionaries often started at such levels, but then unfortunately opened the doors for political entities with less than philanthropic goals.
Global imperialist fucks are often just as barbaric as the savages they aim to subdue and exploit. The difference is that the imperialist paints himself as being morally superior to the brutes they demonize, despite engaging in comparable behavior, albeit in a sophisticated manner.
A great book comparing and contrasting the eventual imperialism of the US to that of the European Empires, specifically in the Middle East, is "Power, Faith and Fantasy." Excellent historical review exploring the duality of these gray areas.
No frontal lobe
Colonialism was a good thing.
Civilization????
its a lie all of africa was like black panther before the white man got there
/sarcasm
Interesting and not surprising.
Wonder what led the blacks to acting like that?
So we are suppose to believe a blind report???
But why would the British tell the truth "IF" they did something bad lol?
If someone reports what they found. Would they report they did something bad along the way???
"Exterminate all the Brutes" = Empires' justification for expanding their global power and exploitation.
jesus
In the temple was found a stash airforce 1s.
David E Reed arrived in Kenya in 1953 during the Mau Mau uprising. A time of horrific barbarity, one of the most inglorious episodes in British imperial history. A dying empire violently lashed out at its attackers in its weakness. He describes events that ignited that barbarity.
https://archive.ph/jBD79
So a complete and total shit hole that should be glassed and turned into the world's parking lot.
GUYS!!!
I am not buying the cool-aid of ANYTHING the west says now.
This is the same west that tried to sell us to wear FACE DIAPERS!!!! This is the same west that told us "our science" says stand "6 FEET APART".
So this guy reads a "FINDING".
And he trusts it because it says so????
LOL!!!!
We know how western media operates.
THEY LIE LIE LIE to paint a positive reputationn.
Do you guys think they would tell you they did some bad shit?
COME ON!!!
This piece has been rediscredited!!!!
Look at the website from the author of this letter.
It says
"1951, Rogers took a giant step closer to achieving his original objective for the Institute by creating a separate sister organization called the American Universities Field Staff (AUFS). Supported by the Ford and Rockefeller Foundations and the membership fees of as many as 20 US colleges, "
GUYS IT HAS MR. CABAL "ROCKERFELLER" mentioned.
This Rodgers guy is in bed with the Cabal!!!
https://www.icwa.org/about/history/