Is she a "rich ignorant white girl"? All we have to go on is her picture. I'd guess it's a troll trying to generate rage bait, but I can't access twitter to see "her" history.
Some googling shows other people feel the same way, and that the avatar is AI-generated.
FYI OP u/oldpatriot, don't get fooled into getting more angry than you need to be by anonymous people on the internet ;)
Edit: oops, all the posts that already pointed out that it was a fake account weren't upvoted as much. Really should scroll down first..
I'm a fan of healthy small hunter gatherer villages. Sure they don't have a skyscraper but sometimes overall health and wellbeing are more valuable. Maybe that's partly what the great awakening is: the true essentials.
Also, I wouldn't completely trust our historians. More and more evidence that civilizations have come and gone on a longer timeline.
And the closer to the equator, the darker you are, the less need for large permanent buildings that protect from the elements.
Is it? The basis of the word civilization has to do with population and technology.
You wouldn't consider a small house with tens of miles of nothing around it civilization.
By the same token, due to population, a village would also be considered civilization.
I assume you mean civilization exclusively referring to cities with large skyscrapers and the like, in which case you'd be right but I haven't really ever heard of anyone who would act that way except maybe entitled city leftists.
Egypt is in Africa, Egyptians were African.
Greeks did not come to Egypt until 700 BC, under the Byzantine Empire, until it was overthrown by Arabs/Middle Easterners in 641 AD.
Also keep in mind the Ancient Greek Empire arose in 900 BC and the Roman Empire wasn’t founded until 625 BC.
The pyramids were built in and around 2000 BC…. Two THOUSAND BC.
Long after Egyptians had already mapped the stars, which is why the pyramids are positioned in astrological topography. They had irrigation systems set up along the Nile back in 3000 BC.
So again the African Egyptians had pyramids, astrology, and irrigation.
Your last sentence is quite ironic, considering you can’t get the chronology of basic civilization history…
You said the Greeks and Romans helped build the pyramids, when neither empire had even started back then. The Greeks and Romans and Arabs didn’t come to Egypt until thousands of years later - after the pyramids, after the irrigation systems set up along the Nile, AFTER mapping and tracking our star system and the birth of astronomy. You can’t even deny these facts, you’re the one full of shit.
Maybe you should try to keep up with the chronological order of history, so you can stop attributing things to groups of people that weren’t even around in Egypt until thousands of years AFTER the pyramids, irrigation systems, and astronomy were conceived.
While I'm sure there's no shortage of racist liberals who agree with this sentiment, the Erica Marsh account is highly suspicious to the point of almost for sure being satire or AI generated.
And THERE'S the most telling part....how many mindless, unthinking, virtue signaling, low info mouth breathers just automatically hit "like" on that stupid ass post?? Dear GOD, there's STILL so much work to do....
Funny how it's mainly white, far left Fasci-Socio-Commies that are complaining about this. I know plenty of black people who have risen to the occasion under a meritocracy that are doing very, very well.
It's either an AI bot or a scammer or a parody account. I tried to pull up their Twitter account to look through their posts, but their account has been suspended.
But going by the replies of people tagging her, I'm 100% convinced it's not a legitimate account. Legitimate meaning their content is actually something they believe.
Edited to add: Just saw another conversation here on this account. Here is a link they had:
Looks like the entire point of that account was to trigger conservatives. Not sure why they wanted to do that, though. Maybe to get us angry enough to get more involved in politics (encouraging nonvoters to vote). Maybe it's supposed to push us into another civil war. Maybe it's to make us look foolish for falling for her BS. Who knows. 🤷
If this is a real person and she is a much of a bigot to throw this out there, she will be deleting this account in...3...2...1... How many times do we need to say this? The only people that believe that African ancestry means an inferior human being are liberals. The concept of treating everyone as equal (in the eyes of the law) seems to be an impossible concept for them. Yes, some people have more advantages than others, some are more athletic, some are more intelligent, some are more charismatic, some are born into wealthier or mentally healthier families. Everyone else has to overcome their own shortcomings and work harder to achieve the same goals. Is it fair? Not particularly, however anyone spouting that life should be fair is trying to sell you something. These are the same people who dole out the most unfair circumstances to future humans through abortion. When you have the same life prospects of any aborted child, then you can complain about how unfair your life has been.
I think police operate on a criminal bias. The super dark tint, the neighborhoods the vehicles are driving in, the familiarity with certain vehicles being more pronounced in the gang style culture. I am certain there are police that pick out ethnic minorities because they have a concious bias, but I believe that the vast majority operate in a bias toward certain targets, not because of their ethnicity, but by the likelihood that certain types of vehicles are more likely to be driven by criminal elements. There is also the fact that they pulled over drivers that are simply breaking the law. This can be seen by black, asian, middle eastern and other ethnic police officers that simply play the odds and pick on folks that have a higher probability of being criminals. Profiling is a useful tool and everyone uses it, not just law enforcement. This is how most people avoid placing themselves in bad situations based on the appearance and attitudes exuded by people in their path. Having grown up in Richmond California in the 80's, I can assure you that body language and type of clothing is a pretty clear indicator of who is aggressive and who is not. You either learned to spot potential trouble halfway down the block or you got robbed/assaulted or killed.
Thanks for the detailed reply. So it comes down to: Black people are more likely to dress/behave in ways that provoke police response ?
How do you think this correlates with black people being less likely to be stopped at night (vs comparitive rate against white people) than during the day? i.e. when they're more visible
Some other interesting tidbits can be found in the study based on data from hundreds of millions of traffic stops.
I think this is more complicated than can be summarized in ahort lists. I definitely don't have all the data, nor do I think anyone else does. Everything boils down to personal experience and anecdotal evidence. The scientifically collected data is always somewhat suspect. 20 years ago, I always believed scientific studies and scientific papers as being honestly researched, analyzed and presented. I no longer believe that. Unfortunately, these studies seem to be biased and manipulated. Not all of them, but a significant enough number that you have to check on who conducted the study and who funded the study.
All that being said, my personal experience and belief is that certain driving habits, certain styles of vehicle and certain vehicle attributes are more likely to provoke a police stop. I do not believe the majority of police pick vehicles to pull over due to race. The reasons I don't believe this is that the vast majority of the vehicles where I live have dark window tint. You cannot tell the race of driver from the outside of a vehicle here. I live in the southeast with subtropical heat. You can't even tell the gender of drivers here. The amount of people driving poorly seems to have increased dramatically in the last ten years, possibly because of cell phone usage. The police can pick almost any vehicle from around them and see some sort of vehicle violation. I stopped using my cell phone in the vehicle entirely. Even with hands free. This allows me to pay better attention to the driving habits around me. I see so many violations just driving back and forth to work, it isn't even funny. I also see the vehicles pulled over by the police, which there are many almost every day. The pattern of vehicles I see seem to fit a profile of young people, teens and early 20's seem to be the most common. My guess is, they have committed the most egregious driving offenses. The vehicle type pulled over the most often are small sporty type vehicles with aftermarket appearance and full size lifted pickups with bigger tires. Somehow, I don't think race is a factor in these stops.
"I only believe what I can see, I don't believe other people and assume they're lying if their studies, that I won't verify, disagree with my world view"
Your approach really doesn't leave a lot of room for debate so I'll let it go, but some generic questions:
Why can't things be different outside your personal sphere?
Why does your personal and anecdotal experience trump those of people who experience the opposite?
It doesn't trump other people's experiences. I just find it difficult to weight other people's experiences. I have also been around to understand that everyone has inherent biases. I am not excluded from the subset of everyone, so I accept that I see the world differently from everyone else. I just happen to know a lot of LEO's, in particular family members. Since I am not a white man, my experiences and viewpoints are more unbiased by racial preferences.
As far as studies go, there has been a recent revelation that approximately 40% of studies are flawed either intentionally or unintentionally. This makes the verification of study data to be crucial and to weight the conclusions appropriately. Undoubtedly, you have been aware of the extremely flawed scientific data involved with the recent Coronavirus and Climate change topics. If this doesn't make you more cautious in viewing study data, then I don't really have much of a footing to persuade you to any particular point of view. Because of the controversial topic of ethnic relations, I would excercise particular care in evaluating any study that draws any conclusion, either for or against. The source of funding for any related study involving ethnic topics are typically very biased for a particular outcome and are unusual in that funding does not typically come from any purely scientific inquiry.
If you're speaking of the study I think you are, it was more about "scientists" creating small-sample studies to find correlations that would generate viral headlines (and funding), usually to do with food, and the extent to which researchers would trip over themselves to make such a connection.
It shouldn't be used so broadly to discredit anything one doesn't like. The study referenced earlier was based on millions of pre-existing traffic stops which couldn't be massaged to the will of the person conducting the studies, and the numbers in this case were black and white (pardon the pun!). How many times were white people stopped, how many times were black people stopped, what are their respective portions of the population.
Mind you I wholeheartedly agree that we should think critically about what we're told, regardless of who is doing the telling, naturally.
Ya take a look at her profile pic and certainly understand how she would experientially know🤯
These self righteous virtue signalling Karens Are an INSULT to any and every Base Value that makes a society Functional..
Sock puppet acccount wouldn't surprise me....however, there's no doubting OldPatriot's assertion that white, liberal women -- who rely more on FEELZ than critical thinking -- are fucking VOTING POISON in our struggling Constitutional Republic.
They’re addicted to SSRIs and self-medicate nightly with a glass (or 4) of wine. And then they have the absolute gall to tell anyone that dares to disagree with their pov that they need therapy 😂🤡🌎
She is getting a much deserved hard time on Twitter, pretty much every post is calling her a racist and then she started acting tough saying she was looking for a defamation lawyer to sue people for her own comments was pretty hilarious.
Yup these liberals are racist for sure.
they truly are.
Aways has been...
How about instead this idiot say " no lazy hand out wanting individuals " will not make it !
Absolutely. Infantilizing an entire race is not anything except racist.
too dumb and poor to get a voter ID right?
The left doesnt give a shit about minority races. they just want to use them as pawns and voters.
assuming you are trolling, obviously we don't need more immigrants, but nice try handshake.
Wow, she needs to read that back to herself. What a huge insult.
Yep. She's a racist.
Ahhhhhh another rich ignorant white gurl coddling blacks like dumb mistreated pets.
Last week, over $1 BILLION in contracts were signed in the NBA on the FIRST DAY of free agency.
https://bleacherreport.com/articles/10081309-2023-nba-free-agency-sees-1b-in-contracts-reportedly-agreed-to-in-1-hour
Most NBA players are Republicans or Independents. It's a big secret.
Is she a "rich ignorant white girl"? All we have to go on is her picture. I'd guess it's a troll trying to generate rage bait, but I can't access twitter to see "her" history.
Some googling shows other people feel the same way, and that the avatar is AI-generated.
FYI OP u/oldpatriot, don't get fooled into getting more angry than you need to be by anonymous people on the internet ;)
Edit: oops, all the posts that already pointed out that it was a fake account weren't upvoted as much. Really should scroll down first..
Thank you sir🫡👍👍👍👍👍
I'm a fan of healthy small hunter gatherer villages. Sure they don't have a skyscraper but sometimes overall health and wellbeing are more valuable. Maybe that's partly what the great awakening is: the true essentials.
Also, I wouldn't completely trust our historians. More and more evidence that civilizations have come and gone on a longer timeline.
And the closer to the equator, the darker you are, the less need for large permanent buildings that protect from the elements.
Excellent points. It is crazy to consider large buildings "civilization."
Is it? The basis of the word civilization has to do with population and technology.
You wouldn't consider a small house with tens of miles of nothing around it civilization.
By the same token, due to population, a village would also be considered civilization.
I assume you mean civilization exclusively referring to cities with large skyscrapers and the like, in which case you'd be right but I haven't really ever heard of anyone who would act that way except maybe entitled city leftists.
Check out Axum. And I believe there are many great civilizations that have been wiped out in Africa.
Are you watching France burn?
The pyramids? I don't know who built them, but I know they're in Africa.
Egyptians are not nubians.
And Las Vegas.
Pyramids? Irrigation systems? Astrology?
Egypt is in Africa, Egyptians were African. Greeks did not come to Egypt until 700 BC, under the Byzantine Empire, until it was overthrown by Arabs/Middle Easterners in 641 AD. Also keep in mind the Ancient Greek Empire arose in 900 BC and the Roman Empire wasn’t founded until 625 BC.
The pyramids were built in and around 2000 BC…. Two THOUSAND BC. Long after Egyptians had already mapped the stars, which is why the pyramids are positioned in astrological topography. They had irrigation systems set up along the Nile back in 3000 BC.
So again the African Egyptians had pyramids, astrology, and irrigation. Your last sentence is quite ironic, considering you can’t get the chronology of basic civilization history…
You said the Greeks and Romans helped build the pyramids, when neither empire had even started back then. The Greeks and Romans and Arabs didn’t come to Egypt until thousands of years later - after the pyramids, after the irrigation systems set up along the Nile, AFTER mapping and tracking our star system and the birth of astronomy. You can’t even deny these facts, you’re the one full of shit. Maybe you should try to keep up with the chronological order of history, so you can stop attributing things to groups of people that weren’t even around in Egypt until thousands of years AFTER the pyramids, irrigation systems, and astronomy were conceived.
Is this a parody account? Seriously, I'd like to know.
Doesn't it say so much that we are not sure one way or the other?
It's a very well-run escalation account.
This is satire. Check Dice's latest video.
Yeah, this is a troll account.
The internet says this is a parody account.
I hope people aren't that stupid.... But I know some really are. Even if this is a parody account.
Some research has show not only is the account fake, its run by a foreign firm specializing in "social selling"
Twitter Link sorry, Erica Marsh Bot Info
"This account is linked to a consulting firm in Belgium.
Michael Zachrau is behind the liberal dystopian bot triggering conservatives.
He’s a digital marketing, SEO, who labels himself as “social selling”."
Link to the guys website if anyone wants to dig for any reason.
Michael Zachrau
While I'm sure there's no shortage of racist liberals who agree with this sentiment, the Erica Marsh account is highly suspicious to the point of almost for sure being satire or AI generated.
Sauce dude?
And THERE'S the most telling part....how many mindless, unthinking, virtue signaling, low info mouth breathers just automatically hit "like" on that stupid ass post?? Dear GOD, there's STILL so much work to do....
Ohh poor retarded Erica, that air whistles through that racist head like a hurricane.
Funny how it's mainly white, far left Fasci-Socio-Commies that are complaining about this. I know plenty of black people who have risen to the occasion under a meritocracy that are doing very, very well.
Erica you ignorant slut.
I did read your post with Dan Aykroyd's voice. Thank you for that!
Blacks never needed affirmative action....The other two AfAm subgroups do.
https://averagebeing.com/who-exactly-is-erica-marsh-viral-twitter-page-explained/
It's either an AI bot or a scammer or a parody account. I tried to pull up their Twitter account to look through their posts, but their account has been suspended.
But going by the replies of people tagging her, I'm 100% convinced it's not a legitimate account. Legitimate meaning their content is actually something they believe.
Edited to add: Just saw another conversation here on this account. Here is a link they had:
https://townhall.com/tipsheet/mattvespa/2023/07/03/this-woman-was-a-popular-liberal-account-on-twitter-she-also-never-existed-n2625263
Edited once more to add:
Looks like the entire point of that account was to trigger conservatives. Not sure why they wanted to do that, though. Maybe to get us angry enough to get more involved in politics (encouraging nonvoters to vote). Maybe it's supposed to push us into another civil war. Maybe it's to make us look foolish for falling for her BS. Who knows. 🤷
If this is a real person and she is a much of a bigot to throw this out there, she will be deleting this account in...3...2...1... How many times do we need to say this? The only people that believe that African ancestry means an inferior human being are liberals. The concept of treating everyone as equal (in the eyes of the law) seems to be an impossible concept for them. Yes, some people have more advantages than others, some are more athletic, some are more intelligent, some are more charismatic, some are born into wealthier or mentally healthier families. Everyone else has to overcome their own shortcomings and work harder to achieve the same goals. Is it fair? Not particularly, however anyone spouting that life should be fair is trying to sell you something. These are the same people who dole out the most unfair circumstances to future humans through abortion. When you have the same life prospects of any aborted child, then you can complain about how unfair your life has been.
See https://communities.win/p/16bidDNtZc/x/c/4Tv9qkGTaBU
Do you think they're more likely to be stopped by police because they're worse drivers or because of bias (unconscious or otherwise)?
I think police operate on a criminal bias. The super dark tint, the neighborhoods the vehicles are driving in, the familiarity with certain vehicles being more pronounced in the gang style culture. I am certain there are police that pick out ethnic minorities because they have a concious bias, but I believe that the vast majority operate in a bias toward certain targets, not because of their ethnicity, but by the likelihood that certain types of vehicles are more likely to be driven by criminal elements. There is also the fact that they pulled over drivers that are simply breaking the law. This can be seen by black, asian, middle eastern and other ethnic police officers that simply play the odds and pick on folks that have a higher probability of being criminals. Profiling is a useful tool and everyone uses it, not just law enforcement. This is how most people avoid placing themselves in bad situations based on the appearance and attitudes exuded by people in their path. Having grown up in Richmond California in the 80's, I can assure you that body language and type of clothing is a pretty clear indicator of who is aggressive and who is not. You either learned to spot potential trouble halfway down the block or you got robbed/assaulted or killed.
Thanks for the detailed reply. So it comes down to: Black people are more likely to dress/behave in ways that provoke police response ?
How do you think this correlates with black people being less likely to be stopped at night (vs comparitive rate against white people) than during the day? i.e. when they're more visible
Some other interesting tidbits can be found in the study based on data from hundreds of millions of traffic stops.
https://www.nyu.edu/about/news-publications/news/2020/may/black-drivers-more-likely-to-be-stopped-by-police.html
I think this is more complicated than can be summarized in ahort lists. I definitely don't have all the data, nor do I think anyone else does. Everything boils down to personal experience and anecdotal evidence. The scientifically collected data is always somewhat suspect. 20 years ago, I always believed scientific studies and scientific papers as being honestly researched, analyzed and presented. I no longer believe that. Unfortunately, these studies seem to be biased and manipulated. Not all of them, but a significant enough number that you have to check on who conducted the study and who funded the study. All that being said, my personal experience and belief is that certain driving habits, certain styles of vehicle and certain vehicle attributes are more likely to provoke a police stop. I do not believe the majority of police pick vehicles to pull over due to race. The reasons I don't believe this is that the vast majority of the vehicles where I live have dark window tint. You cannot tell the race of driver from the outside of a vehicle here. I live in the southeast with subtropical heat. You can't even tell the gender of drivers here. The amount of people driving poorly seems to have increased dramatically in the last ten years, possibly because of cell phone usage. The police can pick almost any vehicle from around them and see some sort of vehicle violation. I stopped using my cell phone in the vehicle entirely. Even with hands free. This allows me to pay better attention to the driving habits around me. I see so many violations just driving back and forth to work, it isn't even funny. I also see the vehicles pulled over by the police, which there are many almost every day. The pattern of vehicles I see seem to fit a profile of young people, teens and early 20's seem to be the most common. My guess is, they have committed the most egregious driving offenses. The vehicle type pulled over the most often are small sporty type vehicles with aftermarket appearance and full size lifted pickups with bigger tires. Somehow, I don't think race is a factor in these stops.
"I only believe what I can see, I don't believe other people and assume they're lying if their studies, that I won't verify, disagree with my world view"
Your approach really doesn't leave a lot of room for debate so I'll let it go, but some generic questions:
Why can't things be different outside your personal sphere?
Why does your personal and anecdotal experience trump those of people who experience the opposite?
It doesn't trump other people's experiences. I just find it difficult to weight other people's experiences. I have also been around to understand that everyone has inherent biases. I am not excluded from the subset of everyone, so I accept that I see the world differently from everyone else. I just happen to know a lot of LEO's, in particular family members. Since I am not a white man, my experiences and viewpoints are more unbiased by racial preferences.
As far as studies go, there has been a recent revelation that approximately 40% of studies are flawed either intentionally or unintentionally. This makes the verification of study data to be crucial and to weight the conclusions appropriately. Undoubtedly, you have been aware of the extremely flawed scientific data involved with the recent Coronavirus and Climate change topics. If this doesn't make you more cautious in viewing study data, then I don't really have much of a footing to persuade you to any particular point of view. Because of the controversial topic of ethnic relations, I would excercise particular care in evaluating any study that draws any conclusion, either for or against. The source of funding for any related study involving ethnic topics are typically very biased for a particular outcome and are unusual in that funding does not typically come from any purely scientific inquiry.
If you're speaking of the study I think you are, it was more about "scientists" creating small-sample studies to find correlations that would generate viral headlines (and funding), usually to do with food, and the extent to which researchers would trip over themselves to make such a connection.
It shouldn't be used so broadly to discredit anything one doesn't like. The study referenced earlier was based on millions of pre-existing traffic stops which couldn't be massaged to the will of the person conducting the studies, and the numbers in this case were black and white (pardon the pun!). How many times were white people stopped, how many times were black people stopped, what are their respective portions of the population.
Mind you I wholeheartedly agree that we should think critically about what we're told, regardless of who is doing the telling, naturally.
That leftist bitch doesn't even realize she is a racist.
Ya take a look at her profile pic and certainly understand how she would experientially know🤯 These self righteous virtue signalling Karens Are an INSULT to any and every Base Value that makes a society Functional..
Theory circulating that this is either a bot or sock puppet account.
Sock puppet acccount wouldn't surprise me....however, there's no doubting OldPatriot's assertion that white, liberal women -- who rely more on FEELZ than critical thinking -- are fucking VOTING POISON in our struggling Constitutional Republic.
They’re addicted to SSRIs and self-medicate nightly with a glass (or 4) of wine. And then they have the absolute gall to tell anyone that dares to disagree with their pov that they need therapy 😂🤡🌎
This has to be a parody account lol
Like babylon bee is, but turns out to be forecasting.
This is a good example of Leftist Privilege.
Abysmal ignorance, on so many levels.
Theyre kinda like pets?
What she said is the travesty!! They only want people to fail! And are more than willing to make sure they do!
Erica Marsh@ericapory note to self 6/29/33 STOP TALKING STUPID PILLS
Let the real systemic racism reveal itself.
Not so fast, Oldpatriot!
https://www.reddit.com/r/WhitePeopleTwitter/comments/14mot9e/the_erica_marsh_hoax/
Thank God she left the (N) word out
Goofy race baiting faggot.
She is getting a much deserved hard time on Twitter, pretty much every post is calling her a racist and then she started acting tough saying she was looking for a defamation lawyer to sue people for her own comments was pretty hilarious.
I do love the new twitter :)
Wow. That's not insulting at all...
This post is about insulting as it gets, blatant!