Q had no shit maybe 2 posts that roughly mentioned Alex Jones company and then literally said “move on” as if it wasn’t really that important.
Personally I think Jones has his place in this plan even if he is ignorant to it. This site hates Jones but me and countless others especially in the military would have been asleep another decade or more without infowars. Jones has woken more people than Q…he has been doing this 25 years and right about A LOT of things. This site doesn’t like that because he claimed to know who Q was and then shit on Q….which also makes me think he said too much and was told to reverse what he said.
I’m hopping his Sandy book lawsuit is part of the plan. That shit would wake up millions or normies.
AJ tried to take over Q, he said he knew Q personally and even had him on his show. Corsi was making big bucks too on acting like he was in the loop. They both finally quit.
I don't know why people dismiss something just because a Shill says it. Even if they're truly a Shill. Even shills talk about things that are factual. Do we dismiss election fraud because AJ said it happened?
I dunno. I think the logic here is that factual and accurate information is factual and accurate, regardless of who espouses it.
HOWEVER, there is a BIG caveat that needs to be included. That is, that shills, disinfo, Controlled opo have ulterior motives that need to be understood and accounted for, otherwise the information becomes the subject (controlling) position, not the listener or reader. IN other words, even if the information is factual or accurate, one needs to recognize WHY this is being shared with you, and to discern and filter that out, so that you can correctly insert your OWN purpose for ingesting or taking in that information.
Otherwise, indeed, you are being 'controlled'.
What do you think, u/Papatriot12 ? Does this answer your question? (The point is not dismissing something. The point is being wary and cautious about WHY that information is being given to you.)
this right here is the issue. 90% truth wrapped in 10% bullshit, and the bullshit is always the juiciest - most likely to be remembered and repeated. credibility vanishes when you go around repeating AJ.
Well your response is exactly what is intended. Have that base kernel of truth buried way way way beneath all the kookified and diversionary and discrediting BS, so true believers can say "SEE? AJ WAS RIGHT"
You know there are newly awakened people who don't understand Q and trash the movement. Many of those people like Stew because he's not a "Q nut". Honestly I'm not his biggest fan but I'm glad he's there for those people.
I think anyone can accept that a prez might at times, use a body double for certain things. But by framing it as "One of the actors pretending to be Joe Biden", he's feeding directly into and stoking the "Joe Biden is not Joe Biden, and Joe was executed at Gitmo a while back" narrative.
bleah. People get so wrapped up in that narrative. The way they do, it's hard to NOT think its a psyop to distract and paint the Patriots and anons etc, as nutso.
(You may get the sense that I don't buy the "the Real Joe is gone" narrative. You'd be right. Too hard to prove, no point to proving it (only lays a foundation for further purely speculative conceptualization), not a factor.)
I agree. This video proves nothing. If it was Biden, the guards were merely outside of camera range when nobody else was around (though maybe poor procedure---which argues that it was not Biden). If it was not Biden, I didn't hear him claiming to be Biden or pretending to be Biden. It could have been just another dude with white hair. He sure seemed to walk with more balance and control than Biden.
Also, when and where was this supposed to have taken place. Too many videos without provenance.
Tautology. Saying that every photo or video of "joe biden' published after Nov 2017 is not the real Joe Biden, and therefor, hes gone, because every photo of "joe biden' published after Nov 2017 is not the real Joe Biden - seems a bit reductive.
I agree, there has been no credible explanatory reason how or why the real JB is gone. Like, real world reasons not wishful thinking. But I do think its hilarious when the claims of photo and video evidence come around once in a while. They don't prove anything claimed, they're just funny that people spend this much effort on a theory.
My friend and I went on a mission to look at different images of Joe over the years. The “old” Joe Biden has a hard look on his face. If you look at the pics of him in 2008 and even the video of “This is a big F*in deal” video from the Obamacare celebration, that is the old Joe.
But somewhere between then and 2016, Joe’s face changed to a softer version. To me, that is not age. And then you have the Getty image photo of him at a 9/11 ceremony with an obvious silicone mask tab on his ear, with heavy makeup visible.
AND, his official signature changed after he was inaugurated.
There are many clues about a “new” Joe Biden when you look closely. Even more interesting is how he seems to have changed before Trump was elected. Why? Was the white hat operation already underway during Obama’s presidency? The apparent arrest of HRC at the 2016 9/11 ceremony seems to suggest that. Along with Comey being forced to talk about her emails in October before an election. So many oddities. Clues?
Free Speech Systems, LLC - Company Profile and Corporate Information. Everything is Alex Jones' information. Someone else posted https://qposts.online/post/2102 but here you go if you don't see it.
Oh please God, PLEASE: let there be a Joe-double who’s now specifically assigned to be “the stair-climber” so handlers don’t have “…another incident…” 🤣
Why is "Joe" wearing a mask? ... OUTDOORS??!! Maybe Stew Peters found someone with a similar build and look and set the whole thing up. The mask, though....hmmm... nah. I'm not buying it.
I absolutely don't mean to be rude or sound mean, frog, but.... put yourself in my shoes. WHY do these comments always come from frogs who have, like, literally a dozen posts in the past year?? Why is it that the weakest lifters always have the highest standards? Get out there on the battlefield and see how it goes.
This is a little bit old. It was going around gaw back in the good ole fake White House, Joe is an actor, robot, deep fake days. Those were some amazing conspiracy times frens!
Isn't it weird that sometimes things come out and the first thing people focus on is the messenger instead of the content? I don't care who stew peters is but that video is real and maybe we can discuss about that? Is that the real Joe Biden? Stew did have an interesting theory that's an actor walking back from his part time job.
So, the logic is that, since it's Stew Peters, that means that Mr. Peters grabbed this actor or double or whatever, managed to corral a few cops, blah blah, faked this?
Just a daily reminder that Stew Peters is an infowars shill. And a faggot
Why? What’s wrong with infowars..
Q had no shit maybe 2 posts that roughly mentioned Alex Jones company and then literally said “move on” as if it wasn’t really that important.
Personally I think Jones has his place in this plan even if he is ignorant to it. This site hates Jones but me and countless others especially in the military would have been asleep another decade or more without infowars. Jones has woken more people than Q…he has been doing this 25 years and right about A LOT of things. This site doesn’t like that because he claimed to know who Q was and then shit on Q….which also makes me think he said too much and was told to reverse what he said.
I’m hopping his Sandy book lawsuit is part of the plan. That shit would wake up millions or normies.
AJ is a primer to Q.
AJ tried to take over Q, he said he knew Q personally and even had him on his show. Corsi was making big bucks too on acting like he was in the loop. They both finally quit.
Plot twist..what if Q was on his show. We don’t know who Q is. Kek
I don't know why people dismiss something just because a Shill says it. Even if they're truly a Shill. Even shills talk about things that are factual. Do we dismiss election fraud because AJ said it happened?
the logic of this comment is bafflingly bad
I dunno. I think the logic here is that factual and accurate information is factual and accurate, regardless of who espouses it.
HOWEVER, there is a BIG caveat that needs to be included. That is, that shills, disinfo, Controlled opo have ulterior motives that need to be understood and accounted for, otherwise the information becomes the subject (controlling) position, not the listener or reader. IN other words, even if the information is factual or accurate, one needs to recognize WHY this is being shared with you, and to discern and filter that out, so that you can correctly insert your OWN purpose for ingesting or taking in that information.
Otherwise, indeed, you are being 'controlled'.
What do you think, u/Papatriot12 ? Does this answer your question? (The point is not dismissing something. The point is being wary and cautious about WHY that information is being given to you.)
Q explicitly stated that Alex Jones is Mossad controlled opposition.
I don't give a crap either way ----- Alex Jones & company have presented contrarian information that has been confirmed elsewhere.
The show has some crap too --- but "Alex Jones is right" has happened often.
It's controlled opposition
True, there is great relevant info revealed. It's usually mixed with bullshit so you go around espousing it, then the joke is on you
this right here is the issue. 90% truth wrapped in 10% bullshit, and the bullshit is always the juiciest - most likely to be remembered and repeated. credibility vanishes when you go around repeating AJ.
Well your response is exactly what is intended. Have that base kernel of truth buried way way way beneath all the kookified and diversionary and discrediting BS, so true believers can say "SEE? AJ WAS RIGHT"
Do you have a link to that drop?
you'll be waiting forever.
just 2 hours...
u/#q2102
You're @GAW, so step up the digging and bread making expertise. No need for coffee and burger flipping experts here.
https://qposts.online/post/2104 ... Read, then click the link below the photo and read.
Big time faggot.
Infowars has had better information on the "vaccine" than the medical industry.
Youre both right from my perspective. Which button to push meme?kek
kek. EVERYONE has better information on the 'vaccine' than the medical industry.
He has always trashed anything Q
You know there are newly awakened people who don't understand Q and trash the movement. Many of those people like Stew because he's not a "Q nut". Honestly I'm not his biggest fan but I'm glad he's there for those people.
Just like I'm glad for people like Tim Pool who can appeal to people many of us wouldn't be able to reach.
No matter how much we try, we cannot turn the world black and white.
Yes. Exactly.
which is how he lost most of his audience.
Random comment:
The spin on this thing ooozes.
I think anyone can accept that a prez might at times, use a body double for certain things. But by framing it as "One of the actors pretending to be Joe Biden", he's feeding directly into and stoking the "Joe Biden is not Joe Biden, and Joe was executed at Gitmo a while back" narrative.
bleah. People get so wrapped up in that narrative. The way they do, it's hard to NOT think its a psyop to distract and paint the Patriots and anons etc, as nutso.
(You may get the sense that I don't buy the "the Real Joe is gone" narrative. You'd be right. Too hard to prove, no point to proving it (only lays a foundation for further purely speculative conceptualization), not a factor.)
I agree. This video proves nothing. If it was Biden, the guards were merely outside of camera range when nobody else was around (though maybe poor procedure---which argues that it was not Biden). If it was not Biden, I didn't hear him claiming to be Biden or pretending to be Biden. It could have been just another dude with white hair. He sure seemed to walk with more balance and control than Biden.
Also, when and where was this supposed to have taken place. Too many videos without provenance.
There's been no photo or video published of the real Joe Biden since November 2017. So it's a fair assumption that he's gone.
Tautology. Saying that every photo or video of "joe biden' published after Nov 2017 is not the real Joe Biden, and therefor, hes gone, because every photo of "joe biden' published after Nov 2017 is not the real Joe Biden - seems a bit reductive.
i just had to look up tautology's meaning lol
bahahahahaha I can't even I'm just gonna exit this thread now
I agree, there has been no credible explanatory reason how or why the real JB is gone. Like, real world reasons not wishful thinking. But I do think its hilarious when the claims of photo and video evidence come around once in a while. They don't prove anything claimed, they're just funny that people spend this much effort on a theory.
My friend and I went on a mission to look at different images of Joe over the years. The “old” Joe Biden has a hard look on his face. If you look at the pics of him in 2008 and even the video of “This is a big F*in deal” video from the Obamacare celebration, that is the old Joe.
But somewhere between then and 2016, Joe’s face changed to a softer version. To me, that is not age. And then you have the Getty image photo of him at a 9/11 ceremony with an obvious silicone mask tab on his ear, with heavy makeup visible.
https://www.gettyimages.com/detail/news-photo/president-joe-biden-attends-the-ceremony-at-the-national-9-news-photo/1235181192
AND, his official signature changed after he was inaugurated.
There are many clues about a “new” Joe Biden when you look closely. Even more interesting is how he seems to have changed before Trump was elected. Why? Was the white hat operation already underway during Obama’s presidency? The apparent arrest of HRC at the 2016 9/11 ceremony seems to suggest that. Along with Comey being forced to talk about her emails in October before an election. So many oddities. Clues?
Have you ever heard the phrase "Alex Jones was right"? If not, you should google it.
https://qposts.online/post/2104 ... Read, then click the link below the photo and read.
Free Speech Systems, LLC - Company Profile and Corporate Information. Everything is Alex Jones' information. Someone else posted https://qposts.online/post/2102 but here you go if you don't see it.
Can you please share. I'm not finding it.
So original.
I think a fair number of Q posta haven't panned out. Maybe everyone is Mossad.
I feel like I saw this maybe 6 months ago?
I remember seeing it.
OK, Taking it down. I knew the hivemind would have something on this and that this would be a short one.
I finally got a room mate in the box of shame .lol
I've been following your "box of shame" saga, aslan. You are one funny frog, my fren. 😂🤣😂
Keep trying, fren! I'm rooting for you! 🐸
kek
With 2 scoops of "Rocky Road"
I can't seem to find anything past 6 hours ago! Mandela effect?
Back in 2021. Anons traced to Sony Culver City back lot. Real video, just not current.
Yup. Old.
About 2 years ago was when I saw it.
Real Joe would have tripped and fallen to the ground exposing the diaper.
.....and he would have sniffed a girl on the way down.
They need to use this one on the stairs
Oh please God, PLEASE: let there be a Joe-double who’s now specifically assigned to be “the stair-climber” so handlers don’t have “…another incident…” 🤣
Kek
Why is "Joe" wearing a mask? ... OUTDOORS??!! Maybe Stew Peters found someone with a similar build and look and set the whole thing up. The mask, though....hmmm... nah. I'm not buying it.
I'm disheartened by this post. This is an old video with no context.
This board is better than this 😑
I absolutely don't mean to be rude or sound mean, frog, but.... put yourself in my shoes. WHY do these comments always come from frogs who have, like, literally a dozen posts in the past year?? Why is it that the weakest lifters always have the highest standards? Get out there on the battlefield and see how it goes.
That video was posted quite awhile ago
Is that Joe Biden or Peter T. Ware?
Someone should have gotten a license plate number and we could have figured out who he is. Inquiring minds want to know.
This is a little bit old. It was going around gaw back in the good ole fake White House, Joe is an actor, robot, deep fake days. Those were some amazing conspiracy times frens!
Isn't it weird that sometimes things come out and the first thing people focus on is the messenger instead of the content? I don't care who stew peters is but that video is real and maybe we can discuss about that? Is that the real Joe Biden? Stew did have an interesting theory that's an actor walking back from his part time job.
u/#topkek
A great Halloween costume.....
I'll wait to see what shill #2 Juan OSavin has to say about this!
This is such CRAP! Stew Peters is a total 🤡 …. Who would believe this is a real?
So, the logic is that, since it's Stew Peters, that means that Mr. Peters grabbed this actor or double or whatever, managed to corral a few cops, blah blah, faked this?
You talking about Biden, the video, or both?
u/#paw