No. I'd give them a pass if they're so mentally disabled they legit don't know what they're doing. They are rare but they exist. If you've ever been to a state mental hospital, you know the kind of patient. The kind that have the mentality of a house pet.
As for "people screw up" there's a difference between a predator who targets toddlers, vs a 13-16yo kid that molests a cousin vs a 21yo horny college guy who knows better but decides to bump uglies with that 16yo jail bait anyway. He's an real idiot, and it's bad what he did, but does he deserve to be executed for it? Only if he reoffends. Stick him in prison, let him think about his bad decision for a decade. When he gets out hopefully he has a clearer head and is now 10 years separated from the influence of young adult hormones and girls gone wild pr0n. That 13-16yo range? That is the hard stuff. They need therapy and monitoring. No easy answers.
If the college dude doesn't learn tho... No more chances.
And don't get me started on pederasty. That's a social disease where the patients become the infective agent themselves.
I think he's trying to say that there are different levels of evil but while true, being 13 years old means you should have a grasp on what is and isn't acceptable behavior. Evil is evil.
Now, I also can't say to execute a kid but it's rare that kids are tried as adults to begin with.
He's not articulating it very well. It sounds like he's trying to talk circles so that he can avoid verbal castration and accusations but... he's actually making it worse that way.
If they are mentally disabled to the point where they don't know it's wrong, they should not be propped up or part of general civilization.
Also, 16 years old is age of consent in a lot of states so your example doesn't really work there either -- and also falls within most realms of Romeo and Juliet style legislation anyway.
I understand your point and I don't necessarily believe you're totally wrong, but I do believe a lot of it is wrong and you are also not articulating it very well.
Now, I am also in favor of cruel and unusual punishment for these things so you won't find a ton of sympathy from me -- it's better to strike the fear into the hearts of would-be offenders than to offer provisions that would allow them to feel safe making those "mistakes".
And there's a difference between that and "I know it's jail bait but imma hit it anyway I'm 20 and horny and she's into me" and someone who targets toddlers.
Both are bad. One is a predator. The other is an idiot who can hopefully learn from the error of his ways.
On 1 end or the other its still sex crimes against children, and the hair splitting you use is what they will use to avoid punishments, slippery slope. Look at the "trans" people going to female prisons...
I get where you're coming from, I really do mate. In my worldview it's one of things that rarely requires any hair splitting, but with some situations it can matter. I'm certainly not suggesting evey person accused or charged of a sex crime needs to be screened for intent and competence. That would be silly. It should be possible to have edge cases without a slippery slope. I know it's not always possible.
So trans and queer people commit sexual crimes against children?? who woulda thunk
its the way they reproduce
Talk about admitting it.
Aaaaaaaaaaand boom!
Penny deleted her account! That's the punchline to every one of these.
They think they're so damn intellectual until they hit "Post".
Lol. Good catch. Not sure if I should correct it, leave it, or throw like a Xer in there for the meme.
I'm going to copy it and put it back up there.
Not all heroes wear capes.
Sorry, had to destroy your 17 updoots, but this is the candidate for "statement of the year":
"They think they're so damn intellectual until they hit "Post"."
Superkek.
Oh my, I'm flattered. Thank you, fren.
They’ll be ok, if they DON’T diddle the kids…🤔
Them: “Alphabet Soup people aren’t Child Sexual Abusers”
Also Them any time a bill targeting child sexual abusers comes up: “This will unfairly harm the Alphabet Soup people”
We understand this 100%. You touch kids, you die. Being mentally ill doesn't give you a pass.
This.
You'd give them a pass for sexually abusing a child??? Based on, 'nobody is perfect and people screw up??) That is truly f'd man. You need help.
No. I'd give them a pass if they're so mentally disabled they legit don't know what they're doing. They are rare but they exist. If you've ever been to a state mental hospital, you know the kind of patient. The kind that have the mentality of a house pet.
As for "people screw up" there's a difference between a predator who targets toddlers, vs a 13-16yo kid that molests a cousin vs a 21yo horny college guy who knows better but decides to bump uglies with that 16yo jail bait anyway. He's an real idiot, and it's bad what he did, but does he deserve to be executed for it? Only if he reoffends. Stick him in prison, let him think about his bad decision for a decade. When he gets out hopefully he has a clearer head and is now 10 years separated from the influence of young adult hormones and girls gone wild pr0n. That 13-16yo range? That is the hard stuff. They need therapy and monitoring. No easy answers.
If the college dude doesn't learn tho... No more chances.
And don't get me started on pederasty. That's a social disease where the patients become the infective agent themselves.
A cousin who molests anyone is just another predator. Ask me how I know.
I think he's trying to say that there are different levels of evil but while true, being 13 years old means you should have a grasp on what is and isn't acceptable behavior. Evil is evil.
Now, I also can't say to execute a kid but it's rare that kids are tried as adults to begin with.
He's not articulating it very well. It sounds like he's trying to talk circles so that he can avoid verbal castration and accusations but... he's actually making it worse that way.
Except, that's not what you said in your now deleted post. I urge you to rethink your original stance.
If they are mentally disabled to the point where they don't know it's wrong, they should not be propped up or part of general civilization.
Also, 16 years old is age of consent in a lot of states so your example doesn't really work there either -- and also falls within most realms of Romeo and Juliet style legislation anyway.
I understand your point and I don't necessarily believe you're totally wrong, but I do believe a lot of it is wrong and you are also not articulating it very well.
Now, I am also in favor of cruel and unusual punishment for these things so you won't find a ton of sympathy from me -- it's better to strike the fear into the hearts of would-be offenders than to offer provisions that would allow them to feel safe making those "mistakes".
Yeah see that's not ok.
And there's a difference between that and "I know it's jail bait but imma hit it anyway I'm 20 and horny and she's into me" and someone who targets toddlers.
Both are bad. One is a predator. The other is an idiot who can hopefully learn from the error of his ways.
Both are predators.
On 1 end or the other its still sex crimes against children, and the hair splitting you use is what they will use to avoid punishments, slippery slope. Look at the "trans" people going to female prisons...
I get where you're coming from, I really do mate. In my worldview it's one of things that rarely requires any hair splitting, but with some situations it can matter. I'm certainly not suggesting evey person accused or charged of a sex crime needs to be screened for intent and competence. That would be silly. It should be possible to have edge cases without a slippery slope. I know it's not always possible.
Is “it” admitting to what we already know?
Yup.
What exactly are you saying..." Penny"? Are you saying trannys are pedos?
She is absolutely discriminating against soup people.
You misspelled he
I think Penny lost her mind a lonnnnngggg time ago, way before this bill was written.
Yeh, I never glanced at the avatar. Looks like a dude.
Exactly
thanks for being honest MISTER Penny
everything regarding the alphabet, apparently, is taken over by child molesters & perverts.
the alphabet soup people= LGTBQABC123, etc.
the rogue agencies= CIA, FBI, etc.
sesame street= Elmo's voice actor was a pedo
"everything regarding the alphabet, apparently, is taken over by child molesters & perverts."
Always has been.
the perv's can no longer hide behind the alphabet soup!
Ha, ha, "the soupers". That's what I'm calling homosexuals and other queerfucks from now on.
https://nitter.com/libsoftiktok/status/1709351821821755727
I did it. On a phone. Even with my fat fingers. I am so proud..
Nevermind. It failed. Shame. Sorry.
Close!
https://nitter.net/libsoftiktok/status/1709351821821755727
I forgot net! I also forgot my arthritic brain. Yikes. Thanks.
Using your queerness as an excuse to molest children basically means you are a pedophile looking for "get out of jail free card" when you get caught.
In other words, premeditated crimes against humanity.
Dear Penny,
You'd better have your shittin pants on.
Because people who abuse kids go in feet first.
FAFO
So who really is putting a target on tranny/queers backs? Good job penny. Woketards are stupid.
'Penny for your thoughts...' BE CAREFUL WHAT YOU WISH FOR!
I see this as an absolute win! .gif
They admit they're all pedos.
pwned
since pedophilia is not curable, death to them is the only way to keep the children safe.
The death penalty is too easy.
Tattoo "PEDO" on their forehead, then put them in medium security prison, general population.
I accept your terms
We hope so!
Don’t diddle kiddies and parents and the state won’t find it necessary to kill you…
Say trans & queers are pedophiles w/o saying trans & queers are pedophiles.
Yes, yes it will. Excellent observation!
Just keep your dick in your pants, man or "woman"
My, what an odd thing to say.
This flair needs to become a regular!
How self aware- evilly!
Fire up the wood chipper !
Yes Penny. This would be the result. With lot's of support, Penny. Thank you for playing.
What kids is Penny diddling?
So what is the problem here?