Debate 101, question the premise of the question/allegations. Never let them control the narrative. They frame questions as allegations. If you answer the "question " you accept the statement as valid. Never accept the allegation always push back on the premise. It's almost always bullshit.
All it ever takes is just a sprinkling of logic and reasoning to upend all their fabricated bullshit lies. "Reporter" dude had zero answers. Well done, Pierre!
Yes. This. And, I'd bet that "common sense" is what many people are already lamenting the absence of, and this sound byte confirms and reinforces their existing opinion. It's quite shrewd and is anything but "emotional."
I don't disagree that the usage of "common sense" is shrewd and calculating, and I think even Thomas Payne recognized its efficacy.
However, we ought to be seeking statesmen and thinkers. I want to caution the readers of my posts against seeking out demagogue that capitalize on our frustrations. Just because one man says the words and phrases with which you might sympathize, doesn't mean that he deserves your support.
"... those men who have overturned the liberties of republics the greatest number have begun their carreer, by paying an obsequious court to the people, commencing Demagogues and ending Tyrants." - Hamilton, Federalist 1
I take your point. Hussein is a classic example of a "smooth talker" who was (and is) a snake. But is Pierre P such a snake? Should he debate more along the lines of a certain "Senator" from PA for us to trust his motivations? I realize this is an extreme example.
Can you suggest a better candidate to displace Castreau Jr? I'm not Canadian, so I have no real voting "skin" in the game, but I'd like to know if there is anyone else who is worthy of attention who can right the Canadian ship.
I don't know about Pierre. This was my first time seeing and hearing the man. Unfortunately, my attention has been rudely shifted back towards my work and the slave mindset of earning money. I've also had little focus for political realities, since my attention has been focused on more immediate problems and my walk with Jesus.
I don't have any skin in the Canadian political game, either. Not being a Canadian subject of the Crown, I have no rights in the area.
We're undergoing a zeitgeist shift. I think it's important for us to remain skeptical and critical thinkers, especially in the times ahead.
I don't understand the downvotes, I made the same observation. His answer started out much the same way the reporter's question did in terms of being ill-defined. Thankfully the reporter was mentally and verbally slow enough not to jump on it, and this man then elaborated with a concrete example of what he means.
Sadly, down-voting the real-life equivalent to giving another speaker a head-shake, as you walk by.
Pay attention to the ratio: four upvotes to ten downvotes. Stating a contrary opinion, even if it is unpopular, is always beneficial. This forum is meant for honest dialogue, and that should always be at the forefront of our minds and the purpose of our posts.
too many people are expressing that they think you are wrong by downvoting. they should just come here and say they think you are wrong. and in the interest of not commenting too many times, I think you are wrong in that you did not listen past the common sense thing.
I actually made it to about 2:05 into the video, before I stopped the playback. He first says "common sense" at about 1:34.
While he had good statements about the budget, he also had repeated the phrase "common sense" about four times. The repetition of it set me off, I suppose.
Most successful politicians know that the economy is what's on most voter's minds. Bill Clinton is remembered for his quote on the economy. This was why I remained skeptical of his words.
Simple, pointed questions at commies is all it takes. Watch them spin themselves into knots because nothing they believe is deeper than superficial talking points. They destroy themselves in the process.
Don’t fool yourselves. PP is only good for his well timed sound bites. Check his voting record to see he’s politically aligned with globalist interests. His absence during the truckers convoy says everything you need to know.
We aren’t voting ourselves out of this mess but if Canada stands any chance, Canadians need to vote PPC.
I get what you're saying. Odds are, you're right. But I am hopeful enough to imagine that he sees the way the tide is turning and may find it better for himself to start doing the right thing after he's elected.
At first, he'll have no choice. He'll need to make it look like he was a man of his word, with the intent of slowly steering towards the globalist path. But when the world wakes up around him, I think he'll be clear-headed enough to start making the right decisions, even if it's just to protect himself.
Totally don’t trust this guy at all. All I have heard from him is how the government will do this differently or that differently or provide these incentives or those.
I have not heard him speak about the criminal financial system at the root of all the problems, or heard he has a plan to return to sound money. The rest of his fiscal plans are nonsense.
I have not heard him speak about how the criminal financial system enables the criminal government and how none of them can be trusted with any responsibility. We need to privatize education so that criminal psychopaths in government can exert absolutely no control over the education of our children because they have used that to turn them into communists and confuse them about their genders. So it must now be private education and all government people involved must be fired.
We need to privatize health care so criminal psychopaths in the government can exert absolutely no control over our health care because they used that control to try an mass murder everyone in the country and enslave the remainder. The list goes on of “common sense” measures.
No, this guy who has made a career in the criminal government is going to change everything. Rising to the top of the criminal government. Must be entirely controlled. I wonder what depraved, highly illegal and immoral shit they have on this guy. Must be a lot.
Every time these leftist retard MSM types start vomiting platitudes, made them back it up! This retard could not back ANY of what he was saying up with any facts. Pierre seems to be a good dude who is not going to take shit.
TBH, the reporter was pretty bad at his job. He was completely intimidated, not even looking at Pierre in the eye. It was easy to take him down. Still this is the right way to handle liberal talking points. Poke holes in everything they say. Keep poking until they deflate and do not let them deflect or change the subject.
The news isn't at all upset about Pierre being our next prime minister. Not like it is about Trump potentially winning the next election or having won 2016. Not like they would be if Max were about to win. Pierre is no threat to them.
I do this every time I speak to a liberal or never trump voter. Turn the questions back on them and ask them to give you factual examples and they end up shutting up. There is no substance to their arguments just what they are told by the media.
As a Canadian, I often wonder if Pierre can actually be trusted. He says so many good things and I want to love the guy but my inner skeptic has so many questions. Certain super hot button shit like LGBT and all this other stuff, he still toes the socially liberal line which sometimes I'm like... "what's the hesitation?" - I get the whole pandering to the middle to win the election.. but yea.
The other thing I have trouble with is accepting that he's even allowed to run and receive this type of coverage. Very recently when Max Bernier magically lost the conservative leadership to Andrew Scheer, it was clear that something was up. They railroaded the fuck out of that guy (and in my opinion rigged the conservative leadership race) - To the point that Maxime literally started his own party called the "People Party" whereby, they then excluded the party from national debates and didn't even mention them even though they had ridings all across the country.
So why does Pierre not get the same treatment. It was clear to me that Maxime Bernier threatened the system. It's not that clear to me with Pierre. They play it up as a big deal... but interestingly, he gets his 5 minutes, he gets his mainstream interviews, debates etc etc. They wouldn't let Maxime speak to the people directly in big spots.
Correct. Pierre is uniparty through and through, and if we don't elect PPC we're sunk. Four more years of mass immigration and that'll be the end of us.
Quoted from a Fren at FreeCanada.win. Four questions that SHOULD be asked of PP, but never will. I don't trust Pierre at all.
"You mentioned that we have a housing shortage. I understand that we need to build more houses, but wouldn't it be also prudent to reduce the number of new people immigrating to Canada? That way we are increasing supply while reducing demand, which would be ideal for young Canadians that currently can't afford housing"
"Many Canadians are out of work and can't find opportunities. Does it make sense to force them to compete with foreign workers for those jobs? We import thousands of people from the Philippines to do this work - is this because they accept lower wage standards than Canadians born here? How is that not a race to the bottom?"
"You mention that Trudeau doesn't embrace free speech, yet your office is on record stating that MEP Christine Anderson's beliefs make her unsuitable for entry in Canada. Mr. PP, you stood and applauded an actual Nazi in the House of Commons - what moral ground do you have to decide which beliefs are acceptable in Canada? Isn't free speech a binary concept, and if not, WHO gets to decide what is acceptable? You? Are you God?"
"Is your doctor an African with English as a second language? Because mine is, and I can't understand him. I have paid thousands in taxes to the government, is this the best quality care I deserve? Perhaps it's time to look at the Health Act? maybe allow some private competition so Canadians don't need to rely on health tourism to USA/Mexico to get the care they need?"
Don't fall for it. The "C"onservative party he leads is uniparty through and through. Pierre and everyone in his party absolutely shit all over us during the convoy. Pierre was not there, the only politician who was there with us was Maxime Bernier of PPC (Canada's only nationalist/populist party). Pierre only glommed onto our movement after it became clear it was totally politically safe to do so. He's a fake conservative and a faggot.
His party is even worse. These are the fuckers that opened us up to free trade with communist China. They won't put an end to it. Last election they promised to end deficits after 10+ years of more deficits (that's two and a half fucking terms!!). They won't undo Justin's tax hikes on small businesses (big businesses were exempt). They won't reverse course on the global warming hoax measure we already have, nor will they stop implementing more. They won't end mass immigration. They were pro Ukraine and will try to get us embroiled in the middle east on Israel's side.
Fuck Pierre Polievre, fuck the "C"onservative Party of Canada. PPC or we are fucking sunk.
Max was the ONLY politician out there on the streets being arrested and ticketed with us. I will NEVER vote for someone who stayed in his office and waited until the cards were down to pick a side.
Who cares about Max's riding? The play for PPC next election is to try to get small rural ridings to elect PPC. We would hopefully gain enough of the "CPC's seats" that the CPC would need a PPC coalition to form a government. NDP/Libs have shown such a coalition can be stable.
YOU are retarded if you think electing one of the same two parties that has been fucking our country since its inception will solve a single problem.
I can’t recall any politician going across the whole country, talking about common sense things like he is, in history.
The media is comparing him to Trump.
Max had his moment last election and has done zilch.
You’d be doing more help to the communists by throwing away a ppc vote.
So it’s Max’s fault for talking common sense, not the fault of people like you for refusing to listen?
Max’s moment was not last election. There were not enough people willing to hear. This coming election with the country coming apart at the seams, hopefully enough people will vote for change.
You’d be doing more help to the communists by throwing away a ppc vote.
“Vote for the communists or you’re helping the communists”
What? It’s YOU who’s helping them by telling everyone it’s hopeless to vote against them. Pierre is one of them and not one of us. If you vote for him you’re voting for more globalism. Specifically what in CPC’s platform appeals to you? The adoption of mass immigration? The refusal to reverse Justin’s tax hikes? The support for NATO’s war of aggression in Ukraine? The support for a war on Israel’s behalf? The CPC’s belief in the global warming hoax? Did a choreographed propaganda video with Pierre eating an apple really trick you into voting for these things? If so, lol.
That 'journalist' was entirely unprepared to be questioned in return, which is a remarkable weakness for anyone allegedly trying to expose truth. Ah, but that's the thing, eh? They aren't trying to expose truth, they're trying to tell people what to think, believe, etc...with the idiotic questions they lead with.
Oh well. Smart people win...when on the side of the Highest Good for All Concerned. I just am looking enthusiastically forward to the part where the bad guys just get decimated...like that scene in LoTR in which Aragorn cuts a deal with the King of the Dead to set them free in return for fucking up Sauron's armies.
Can anyone tell me who the reporter is? I've tried to find info on him or his network/channel and I see nothing. Everyone is talking about it, but nobody is asking if this is staged. This seems too much like a well-rehearsed, multi-take piece of self-promotion.
THIS IS HOW YOU COMBAT MARXIST DIATRIBE!!!
"What do you mean? ...." "What people are talking about? ..." "Give me an example please …" "What specifically are you referring to? …"
This turns their bullshit loaded questions right back on them.
This guy is a conversational ninja. I love it!!!!!!
What page ? Give me a page ,, friggin classic !
u/#neo
Ditto! That was fantastic! And I love how he casually ate that apple while the "reporter" was stumbling all over himself. Outstanding take down!
I am instantly a new fan. This guy is amazing at just pulling their questions apart, so good!
Debate 101, question the premise of the question/allegations. Never let them control the narrative. They frame questions as allegations. If you answer the "question " you accept the statement as valid. Never accept the allegation always push back on the premise. It's almost always bullshit.
Well said fren
In law if you don’t object, it stands as the truth.
What is a tax payer? How am I a tax payer?
Is the State a location or an entity - and how did it establish jurisdiction over me without my knowledge or consent?
100%, and he did it like a master in full control. So smooth.
All it ever takes is just a sprinkling of logic and reasoning to upend all their fabricated bullshit lies. "Reporter" dude had zero answers. Well done, Pierre!
Holy shit that was awesome. Force the reporter to phrase an actual question and don't let them put words in your mouth. That was great.
sound bytes are the only things that get air time in media interviews. The masses don't have the attention span for anything else.
common sense is easily understood. points to a ton of shit without saying anything.
Yes. This. And, I'd bet that "common sense" is what many people are already lamenting the absence of, and this sound byte confirms and reinforces their existing opinion. It's quite shrewd and is anything but "emotional."
Also, "Common Sense" was good enough for Thomas Payne, so it's good enough for me. https://oll.libertyfund.org/page/1776-paine-common-sense-pamphlet
I don't disagree that the usage of "common sense" is shrewd and calculating, and I think even Thomas Payne recognized its efficacy.
However, we ought to be seeking statesmen and thinkers. I want to caution the readers of my posts against seeking out demagogue that capitalize on our frustrations. Just because one man says the words and phrases with which you might sympathize, doesn't mean that he deserves your support.
"... those men who have overturned the liberties of republics the greatest number have begun their carreer, by paying an obsequious court to the people, commencing Demagogues and ending Tyrants." - Hamilton, Federalist 1
I take your point. Hussein is a classic example of a "smooth talker" who was (and is) a snake. But is Pierre P such a snake? Should he debate more along the lines of a certain "Senator" from PA for us to trust his motivations? I realize this is an extreme example.
Can you suggest a better candidate to displace Castreau Jr? I'm not Canadian, so I have no real voting "skin" in the game, but I'd like to know if there is anyone else who is worthy of attention who can right the Canadian ship.
I don't know about Pierre. This was my first time seeing and hearing the man. Unfortunately, my attention has been rudely shifted back towards my work and the slave mindset of earning money. I've also had little focus for political realities, since my attention has been focused on more immediate problems and my walk with Jesus.
I don't have any skin in the Canadian political game, either. Not being a Canadian subject of the Crown, I have no rights in the area.
We're undergoing a zeitgeist shift. I think it's important for us to remain skeptical and critical thinkers, especially in the times ahead.
I don't understand the downvotes, I made the same observation. His answer started out much the same way the reporter's question did in terms of being ill-defined. Thankfully the reporter was mentally and verbally slow enough not to jump on it, and this man then elaborated with a concrete example of what he means.
Sadly, down-voting the real-life equivalent to giving another speaker a head-shake, as you walk by.
Pay attention to the ratio: four upvotes to ten downvotes. Stating a contrary opinion, even if it is unpopular, is always beneficial. This forum is meant for honest dialogue, and that should always be at the forefront of our minds and the purpose of our posts.
too many people are expressing that they think you are wrong by downvoting. they should just come here and say they think you are wrong. and in the interest of not commenting too many times, I think you are wrong in that you did not listen past the common sense thing.
I actually made it to about 2:05 into the video, before I stopped the playback. He first says "common sense" at about 1:34.
While he had good statements about the budget, he also had repeated the phrase "common sense" about four times. The repetition of it set me off, I suppose.
Most successful politicians know that the economy is what's on most voter's minds. Bill Clinton is remembered for his quote on the economy. This was why I remained skeptical of his words.
Simple, pointed questions at commies is all it takes. Watch them spin themselves into knots because nothing they believe is deeper than superficial talking points. They destroy themselves in the process.
Plus, they ARE a bunch of dullards.
Don’t fool yourselves. PP is only good for his well timed sound bites. Check his voting record to see he’s politically aligned with globalist interests. His absence during the truckers convoy says everything you need to know. We aren’t voting ourselves out of this mess but if Canada stands any chance, Canadians need to vote PPC.
I get what you're saying. Odds are, you're right. But I am hopeful enough to imagine that he sees the way the tide is turning and may find it better for himself to start doing the right thing after he's elected.
At first, he'll have no choice. He'll need to make it look like he was a man of his word, with the intent of slowly steering towards the globalist path. But when the world wakes up around him, I think he'll be clear-headed enough to start making the right decisions, even if it's just to protect himself.
Based and uni-party pilled.
Totally don’t trust this guy at all. All I have heard from him is how the government will do this differently or that differently or provide these incentives or those.
I have not heard him speak about the criminal financial system at the root of all the problems, or heard he has a plan to return to sound money. The rest of his fiscal plans are nonsense.
I have not heard him speak about how the criminal financial system enables the criminal government and how none of them can be trusted with any responsibility. We need to privatize education so that criminal psychopaths in government can exert absolutely no control over the education of our children because they have used that to turn them into communists and confuse them about their genders. So it must now be private education and all government people involved must be fired.
We need to privatize health care so criminal psychopaths in the government can exert absolutely no control over our health care because they used that control to try an mass murder everyone in the country and enslave the remainder. The list goes on of “common sense” measures.
No, this guy who has made a career in the criminal government is going to change everything. Rising to the top of the criminal government. Must be entirely controlled. I wonder what depraved, highly illegal and immoral shit they have on this guy. Must be a lot.
Tired of the puppet show
Like The Princess Graham and "Not so" Cocaine Mitch used to be,,,
That must be a damn good apple. Well done!
How do you like THEM apples?
That was beautiful.
Reminds me of someone. Useful Idiot: bla bla blahhhhh! Andrew Breitbart: So?
Every time these leftist retard MSM types start vomiting platitudes, made them back it up! This retard could not back ANY of what he was saying up with any facts. Pierre seems to be a good dude who is not going to take shit.
The fkn unhealthy robot couldn’t even look up. They are so controlled ! I loved this
Lol no kidding truth sparks clarity , sadly when they walk away they are back under control ,, but it’s happening !
Always question their accusations which are disguised as questions.
They can't go off script... At least in no meaningful way.
Also remaining calm while chomping on an apple definitely helps.
Hahaha, I love the apple eating, nothing like saying you are beneath contempt. Like who, which people. Give me an example. Hahaha. Snort.
Don’t forget “whose?”
Wait, I know this one.
It has something to do with Communism.
And dildos.
Comical!
TBH, the reporter was pretty bad at his job. He was completely intimidated, not even looking at Pierre in the eye. It was easy to take him down. Still this is the right way to handle liberal talking points. Poke holes in everything they say. Keep poking until they deflate and do not let them deflect or change the subject.
The news isn't at all upset about Pierre being our next prime minister. Not like it is about Trump potentially winning the next election or having won 2016. Not like they would be if Max were about to win. Pierre is no threat to them.
I do this every time I speak to a liberal or never trump voter. Turn the questions back on them and ask them to give you factual examples and they end up shutting up. There is no substance to their arguments just what they are told by the media.
Most of the never trumpers that I know don't shut up, they just get completely pissed off when you question them.
Instant classic!!!
He should've offered the sheep an apple though...
Poilievre sounds like Elon did in his BBC interview. Turns the interview around on the "journalist".
That MSM faggot uses his hat to block eye contact... classic mental illness...
Lmao, reminds me of Brad Pitt always eating in movies.
That funny...He always does.
Ever seen a movie that Tom Cruise doesn't do a 100 yard sprint...
Eyes Wide Shut might be the only exception.
Didn't see that one
lol
Looks like a campaign ad to me. If it isn't, it should be.
lmao
Spectacular! He decimates the “reporter.” The Apple eating… perfect!
As a Canadian, I often wonder if Pierre can actually be trusted. He says so many good things and I want to love the guy but my inner skeptic has so many questions. Certain super hot button shit like LGBT and all this other stuff, he still toes the socially liberal line which sometimes I'm like... "what's the hesitation?" - I get the whole pandering to the middle to win the election.. but yea.
The other thing I have trouble with is accepting that he's even allowed to run and receive this type of coverage. Very recently when Max Bernier magically lost the conservative leadership to Andrew Scheer, it was clear that something was up. They railroaded the fuck out of that guy (and in my opinion rigged the conservative leadership race) - To the point that Maxime literally started his own party called the "People Party" whereby, they then excluded the party from national debates and didn't even mention them even though they had ridings all across the country.
So why does Pierre not get the same treatment. It was clear to me that Maxime Bernier threatened the system. It's not that clear to me with Pierre. They play it up as a big deal... but interestingly, he gets his 5 minutes, he gets his mainstream interviews, debates etc etc. They wouldn't let Maxime speak to the people directly in big spots.
Correct. Pierre is uniparty through and through, and if we don't elect PPC we're sunk. Four more years of mass immigration and that'll be the end of us.
He kicked the poor guy's ass. Very eloquent guy. Don't trust him for a moment, though.
Quoted from a Fren at FreeCanada.win. Four questions that SHOULD be asked of PP, but never will. I don't trust Pierre at all.
"You mentioned that we have a housing shortage. I understand that we need to build more houses, but wouldn't it be also prudent to reduce the number of new people immigrating to Canada? That way we are increasing supply while reducing demand, which would be ideal for young Canadians that currently can't afford housing"
"Many Canadians are out of work and can't find opportunities. Does it make sense to force them to compete with foreign workers for those jobs? We import thousands of people from the Philippines to do this work - is this because they accept lower wage standards than Canadians born here? How is that not a race to the bottom?"
"You mention that Trudeau doesn't embrace free speech, yet your office is on record stating that MEP Christine Anderson's beliefs make her unsuitable for entry in Canada. Mr. PP, you stood and applauded an actual Nazi in the House of Commons - what moral ground do you have to decide which beliefs are acceptable in Canada? Isn't free speech a binary concept, and if not, WHO gets to decide what is acceptable? You? Are you God?"
"Is your doctor an African with English as a second language? Because mine is, and I can't understand him. I have paid thousands in taxes to the government, is this the best quality care I deserve? Perhaps it's time to look at the Health Act? maybe allow some private competition so Canadians don't need to rely on health tourism to USA/Mexico to get the care they need?"
There's a 0% chance Pierre will meaningfully reduce immigration levels. Wish I was wrong.
BOOM!
Intelligence agents… the entire media.
Low intel agents
Yup
That guy just won the election.... if it's not rigged.
This was great!
Don't fall for it. The "C"onservative party he leads is uniparty through and through. Pierre and everyone in his party absolutely shit all over us during the convoy. Pierre was not there, the only politician who was there with us was Maxime Bernier of PPC (Canada's only nationalist/populist party). Pierre only glommed onto our movement after it became clear it was totally politically safe to do so. He's a fake conservative and a faggot.
His party is even worse. These are the fuckers that opened us up to free trade with communist China. They won't put an end to it. Last election they promised to end deficits after 10+ years of more deficits (that's two and a half fucking terms!!). They won't undo Justin's tax hikes on small businesses (big businesses were exempt). They won't reverse course on the global warming hoax measure we already have, nor will they stop implementing more. They won't end mass immigration. They were pro Ukraine and will try to get us embroiled in the middle east on Israel's side.
Fuck Pierre Polievre, fuck the "C"onservative Party of Canada. PPC or we are fucking sunk.
You’re retarded.
What has max done but been a grifter for the past 6 years?!
He couldn’t even win his own riding.
Hasn’t done one thing to grow his party or it’s name recognition.
Max was the ONLY politician out there on the streets being arrested and ticketed with us. I will NEVER vote for someone who stayed in his office and waited until the cards were down to pick a side.
Who cares about Max's riding? The play for PPC next election is to try to get small rural ridings to elect PPC. We would hopefully gain enough of the "CPC's seats" that the CPC would need a PPC coalition to form a government. NDP/Libs have shown such a coalition can be stable.
YOU are retarded if you think electing one of the same two parties that has been fucking our country since its inception will solve a single problem.
I can’t recall any politician going across the whole country, talking about common sense things like he is, in history.
The media is comparing him to Trump.
Max had his moment last election and has done zilch.
You’d be doing more help to the communists by throwing away a ppc vote.
https://nationalpost.com/news/politics/poilievre-says-liberal-immigration-target-driven-by-trudeaus-ideology-but-doesnt-say-if-conservatives-might-lower-number
This is you: "I'm voting for mass immigration to end mass immigration!"
So it’s Max’s fault for talking common sense, not the fault of people like you for refusing to listen?
Max’s moment was not last election. There were not enough people willing to hear. This coming election with the country coming apart at the seams, hopefully enough people will vote for change.
“Vote for the communists or you’re helping the communists”
What? It’s YOU who’s helping them by telling everyone it’s hopeless to vote against them. Pierre is one of them and not one of us. If you vote for him you’re voting for more globalism. Specifically what in CPC’s platform appeals to you? The adoption of mass immigration? The refusal to reverse Justin’s tax hikes? The support for NATO’s war of aggression in Ukraine? The support for a war on Israel’s behalf? The CPC’s belief in the global warming hoax? Did a choreographed propaganda video with Pierre eating an apple really trick you into voting for these things? If so, lol.
I love his attitude and voice.🥰 Go Canadians!
Loool He did this as an example for all of us :))))
lol.. that was a verbal ass-whooping!!! Pierre was so totally calm as he destroyed that media maggot!
WOW - JUST WOW!! BRING IT SIR! :)
That 'journalist' was entirely unprepared to be questioned in return, which is a remarkable weakness for anyone allegedly trying to expose truth. Ah, but that's the thing, eh? They aren't trying to expose truth, they're trying to tell people what to think, believe, etc...with the idiotic questions they lead with.
Oh well. Smart people win...when on the side of the Highest Good for All Concerned. I just am looking enthusiastically forward to the part where the bad guys just get decimated...like that scene in LoTR in which Aragorn cuts a deal with the King of the Dead to set them free in return for fucking up Sauron's armies.
Can anyone tell me who the reporter is? I've tried to find info on him or his network/channel and I see nothing. Everyone is talking about it, but nobody is asking if this is staged. This seems too much like a well-rehearsed, multi-take piece of self-promotion.
Okay, I dug enough to find an answer.
https://www.castanetkamloops.net/reporter/Don-Urquhart