Mike Pomepeo was responsible for the Monsanto Protection Act. He's been my enemy for a very long time. He also opposed Trump's partial declassification of the JFK files in November 2017 or so.
FYI, in this clip, it was NOT Pompeo who was talking with Carlson, but someone else at the CIA. So.... Tucker drew his conclusions, but the clip sounds like it was Pompeo, when it wasn't.
No, I thought everybody here would remember Pompeo cautioning Trump from declassifying the JFK files. He was opposed to it. We only got a partial declass.
Again, according to who? is there some clip of Pompeo saying this to DJT? Some report? Whats' the basis?
Anyway, maybe it wasn't time to declass the JFK files. DJT has announced (I read somewhere) that he'll to that all first day he's in office.... IF one makes the assumption (based on what?) that it would have been BEST for DJT to declass ALL the JFK stuff, why would he not do it? Just because evil Mike Pompeo cautioned him?
This doesn't seem like strong reasoning to me. But that's also a mildly uninformed opinion on my part...
I'm just going off of memory about the JFK stuff. This happened almost 7 years ago. I really did not follow Tucker back then, nor have I seen anything that Tucker has said about this topic recently. I'm just saying that I really disliked Pompeo for several years for being Mr. Monsanto. I didn't like that Trump picked Pompeo to be a part of his administration, but then again I was also glad that it meant one less GMO shill in Congress.
EDIT: To help you understand, Twitter is blocked at work. When I made my original comment, I was at my work computer and was unable to see the Tucker clip. I was posting my opinion without seeing what Tucker said in the video.
I have no idea or info on Pompeo's connections with Monsanto, so I cannot draw any conclusions. I do think, however, that Monsanto is about as evil as Blackrock, imo. But that's a mildly uninformed opinion.
Yeah, Pompeo was big time in money from Monsanto and the Koch brothers. I had become so disillusioned with the Republicans being owned by Monsanto and how only Democrats pretended to oppose them that for a while I was prepared to grit my teeth and vote for Bernie. At the time, I only heard of Bernie opposing the TPP, which would have foisted Monsanto upon Japan where I live and allow that corporation to essentially write Japanese laws and force the country to lift its ban on GMO crops on native soil. Then Trump came along and I was relieved to see him infuriating all the right people. Later I found out that Bernie is a hypocrite and just pretends to stand up to Monsanto. Kraft, Coca Cola, and so many other food giants lobby hard to suppress consumer awareness in the USA, and Pompeo was very happy to take Monsanto's money and defend them.
I suspect Tucker is a soft psyop -- meaning he knows about things well in advance of when he "breaks" them - like a calculated delay in putting critical issues on a big platform after "fringe" knowledge has already started becoming "common" knowledge when it no longer can be denied. But also when it starts to no longer matter except to demoralize the audience. The window of time already passed when an uninformed public could have made better decisions or effected more change than they are now able to or motivated to.
Of course he doesn't always do this, or his credibility would be seriously questioned by more. But it's been noticeable enough, he gets some sort of green light to move forward with certain topics. The vaccine injuries are the most obvious example, the Gaza genocide being another.
Tucker admitted he’s run psyops.
He said it in an interview maybe 2 weeks ago? It was even posted here. He admitted the media ran psyop and he knows psyops well because he has run many being in the media. I’m paraphrasing.
It was the same interview where he said he believed in these fallen angel demon type things.
Haven't heard that. His dad was an investigative reporter for years and was appointed as director of 'Voice of America' by Ronald Reagan. In 2021 he was director of Policy Impact, a firm that has lobbied the US on behalf of the Viktor Orbán government in Hungary.
Never suggested that he did, although some do. I only said I hadn't heard or read it. If you have a source it would be appreciated. He may well have been a clown asset. Just as you may or I may be for all the world knows.
Putin said he tried to get in with them, which is devoid of context and should not be taken as a fact of him actually succeeding or having malice in the first place.
We've seen Tucker change more than any other media personality over the years, and where the media personalities almost always trend towards the left and government, Tucker has trended towards the right and against government.
I would guess there are a tiny handful of people at the CIA who feel bad about some of what has been done and that its no way to run a nation. I think Tucker and Alex Jones probably have links with these people as well and one or two others who do the rounds but they have no real institutional influence over policy in the agency.
I view the world as having a few different power factions.
The Zionists - tied into the MIC and Intel agencies, international finance but among the Zionists they are not a unified camp. They go from the New York faction who just want to steal land vs the Khanists who have the red heffers and want to bring about the apocalypse.
You have the "techno-totalitarians" who are some of the big industrialists like Rockefeller and the big tech firms who are really into global government. The Zionists I believe might swallow government if it was run from Tel Aviv but don't really trust them.
You also have the third worldist faction lead by George Soros and open society who believe by turning the whole world into South Africa that they will be able to rule unopposed over garbage heap.
I've heard the comment that the globalists became more divided after David Rockefeller died. That a schism has opened up to some degree since then.
This is how I take EVERYONE.
Like a vindiagram. They all have their own agenda, and some overlap with ours more than others. When their actions don't overlap with our agenda, it doesn't mean they turned against us, and when their actions align with our agenda, it doesn't mean they are our friend.
To further complicate things, their true agenda doesn't always align with their actions since psywar is layered perceived agendas are often false.
When Tucker was fired by Fox News he was able to tell more truth. You could tell in some of his interviews that he has know many truths for many years. He is now free to tell them.
One thing I still don't get, why did Pompeo post the Red countdown leading up to inauguration? Just playing along with the joke to make Q followers look like idiots, maybe?
Trump put all the enemies of the country front and center! The logic is that when their criminality is finally revealed, people know who they are; while Trump can pretend that he was only following the experts! Genius!
I just had this thought but I don't know if there's anything to it: Did Q ever spell out TRUST as an acronym? Like vertically spelling out the meaning of the first letter of each part of the word? Maybe it's a map thing?
Trust Kansas
Trust Kansas to shed light on CIA corruption by continuing to be corrupt even while in the immense spotlight supplied by Trump
and what if Trust Kansas is related to something completely different - LIke the Kansas lawsuit against Pfizer….
Sure.
And what if it's about the wizard of oz?
Or the Jayhawks 2022?
Or maybe the Black Mafia of the 60s?
Point is, the timing of the post most likely referred to Pompeo.
Q drop 2448; “Disinfo is NECESSARY.”
https://qalerts.app/?n=2448
I understand the sentiment.
But it's a highly vague {purposely so}. It doesn't allow us to get closer to the truth, only to suspect everything is a lie.
That is the truth.
The Q drops are pretty clear on this. https://qalerts.app/?q=Trust+Kansas
Mike Pomepeo was responsible for the Monsanto Protection Act. He's been my enemy for a very long time. He also opposed Trump's partial declassification of the JFK files in November 2017 or so.
According to .... Tucker?
FYI, in this clip, it was NOT Pompeo who was talking with Carlson, but someone else at the CIA. So.... Tucker drew his conclusions, but the clip sounds like it was Pompeo, when it wasn't.
No, I thought everybody here would remember Pompeo cautioning Trump from declassifying the JFK files. He was opposed to it. We only got a partial declass.
Again, according to who? is there some clip of Pompeo saying this to DJT? Some report? Whats' the basis?
Anyway, maybe it wasn't time to declass the JFK files. DJT has announced (I read somewhere) that he'll to that all first day he's in office.... IF one makes the assumption (based on what?) that it would have been BEST for DJT to declass ALL the JFK stuff, why would he not do it? Just because evil Mike Pompeo cautioned him?
This doesn't seem like strong reasoning to me. But that's also a mildly uninformed opinion on my part...
I'm just going off of memory about the JFK stuff. This happened almost 7 years ago. I really did not follow Tucker back then, nor have I seen anything that Tucker has said about this topic recently. I'm just saying that I really disliked Pompeo for several years for being Mr. Monsanto. I didn't like that Trump picked Pompeo to be a part of his administration, but then again I was also glad that it meant one less GMO shill in Congress.
EDIT: To help you understand, Twitter is blocked at work. When I made my original comment, I was at my work computer and was unable to see the Tucker clip. I was posting my opinion without seeing what Tucker said in the video.
Thanks for the extra info, Steve.
I have no idea or info on Pompeo's connections with Monsanto, so I cannot draw any conclusions. I do think, however, that Monsanto is about as evil as Blackrock, imo. But that's a mildly uninformed opinion.
Yeah, Pompeo was big time in money from Monsanto and the Koch brothers. I had become so disillusioned with the Republicans being owned by Monsanto and how only Democrats pretended to oppose them that for a while I was prepared to grit my teeth and vote for Bernie. At the time, I only heard of Bernie opposing the TPP, which would have foisted Monsanto upon Japan where I live and allow that corporation to essentially write Japanese laws and force the country to lift its ban on GMO crops on native soil. Then Trump came along and I was relieved to see him infuriating all the right people. Later I found out that Bernie is a hypocrite and just pretends to stand up to Monsanto. Kraft, Coca Cola, and so many other food giants lobby hard to suppress consumer awareness in the USA, and Pompeo was very happy to take Monsanto's money and defend them.
https://www.centerforfoodsafety.org/press-releases/3042/koch-industries-and-monsanto-team-up-to-end-your-right-to-know
Isn't Carlson tied to the CIA through his daddy?
Yes, and Hunter was his neighbor. I haven’t heard any psyop from Tucker though.
We are no better than Ukraine….a country of oligarchs. How incestuous is the whole DC area.
I suspect Tucker is a soft psyop -- meaning he knows about things well in advance of when he "breaks" them - like a calculated delay in putting critical issues on a big platform after "fringe" knowledge has already started becoming "common" knowledge when it no longer can be denied. But also when it starts to no longer matter except to demoralize the audience. The window of time already passed when an uninformed public could have made better decisions or effected more change than they are now able to or motivated to.
Of course he doesn't always do this, or his credibility would be seriously questioned by more. But it's been noticeable enough, he gets some sort of green light to move forward with certain topics. The vaccine injuries are the most obvious example, the Gaza genocide being another.
Pressure valve that makes people think something is getting done.
The same could be said about at least 17 other things...but let's give them the benefit of the doubt until proven otherwise.
This is a good point. Who should we trust more, Kansas or Tucker?
Tucker admitted he’s run psyops. He said it in an interview maybe 2 weeks ago? It was even posted here. He admitted the media ran psyop and he knows psyops well because he has run many being in the media. I’m paraphrasing.
It was the same interview where he said he believed in these fallen angel demon type things.
I think he’s a Ghost in the Machine type.
Well, what has Q said about Tucker?
Haven't heard that. His dad was an investigative reporter for years and was appointed as director of 'Voice of America' by Ronald Reagan. In 2021 he was director of Policy Impact, a firm that has lobbied the US on behalf of the Viktor Orbán government in Hungary.
He didn't wear his CIA badge on his lapel, just as no one else does either.
Never suggested that he did, although some do. I only said I hadn't heard or read it. If you have a source it would be appreciated. He may well have been a clown asset. Just as you may or I may be for all the world knows.
Putin did hint at it tho.
Putin said he tried to get in with them, which is devoid of context and should not be taken as a fact of him actually succeeding or having malice in the first place.
We've seen Tucker change more than any other media personality over the years, and where the media personalities almost always trend towards the left and government, Tucker has trended towards the right and against government.
Nope. Dad was CIA.
He’s admitted that as much. Anderson Cooper is cia obviously. They have people in many industries not just voice of America.
Ted Cruz's dad too, right?
I would guess there are a tiny handful of people at the CIA who feel bad about some of what has been done and that its no way to run a nation. I think Tucker and Alex Jones probably have links with these people as well and one or two others who do the rounds but they have no real institutional influence over policy in the agency.
Right. I think there's a big war for control behind the scenes among the elites, who are just as divided as the rest of the country is.
I view the world as having a few different power factions.
The Zionists - tied into the MIC and Intel agencies, international finance but among the Zionists they are not a unified camp. They go from the New York faction who just want to steal land vs the Khanists who have the red heffers and want to bring about the apocalypse.
You have the "techno-totalitarians" who are some of the big industrialists like Rockefeller and the big tech firms who are really into global government. The Zionists I believe might swallow government if it was run from Tel Aviv but don't really trust them.
You also have the third worldist faction lead by George Soros and open society who believe by turning the whole world into South Africa that they will be able to rule unopposed over garbage heap.
I've heard the comment that the globalists became more divided after David Rockefeller died. That a schism has opened up to some degree since then.
During an interview someone said Tucker had tried to get into the CIA and was told no. Tucker dispute it.
1685 Now do you understand why mirrors and DISINFORMATION is necessary? Logical thinking. [20] Q
You beat me to it. I should have read all the comments before I posted the drop. My bad.
And yet Pompeo cleaned up parts of the CIA according to other sources. I'll reserve my judgment for now.
This is how I take EVERYONE. Like a vindiagram. They all have their own agenda, and some overlap with ours more than others. When their actions don't overlap with our agenda, it doesn't mean they turned against us, and when their actions align with our agenda, it doesn't mean they are our friend.
To further complicate things, their true agenda doesn't always align with their actions since psywar is layered perceived agendas are often false.
Trump was surrounded by traitors.
When Tucker was fired by Fox News he was able to tell more truth. You could tell in some of his interviews that he has know many truths for many years. He is now free to tell them.
Trust Kansas?
Trust him to be a globalhomo clown.
That’s where my trust is as well !!!
We still don’t know for sure that Pompeo=Kansas. We assumed that.
SOME assumed that, I never did. I always thought it was the band…
Carry on, wayward son. Carry on.
u/#spitcoffee
There'll be peace when you are done...
Lol and a good one .. band!!
After all, they encouraged us to Carry On to the Point of KNOW* Return.
*Yes, that's how Kansas spells it in the song.
Thank you. I think there are a lot of assumptions that most of us ran with, and this could very well be one.
I believe this drop is what started that.
u/#q950
For all we know the context of "Kansas" could mean more than just anyone from there
It could mean both the state legislature of supreme court of Kansas, Which is currently suing Pfizer for false advertising
I think technically, the AG Kris Koback is suing Pfizer. Your point is very well taken.
He said anti Zionism is anti-Semitism. That clears it up for me he can't be Kansas.
People seem to forget Q wasn't followed just by anons, it was also followed by the deep state. "Disinformation is necessary".
u/#q1685
Thank you.
Pompeo = CIA = 666. Pompeo is dirty.
One thing I still don't get, why did Pompeo post the Red countdown leading up to inauguration? Just playing along with the joke to make Q followers look like idiots, maybe?
Be careful who you follow.
Did you know Tucker acts like he worked hard to get where he is.
He is from Swanson money and he never worked for anything.
His wife is mega rich.
The only reason they'd care is that the tracks to the cia would lead to the mossad. Tucker running cover for these ppl?
Trump put all the enemies of the country front and center! The logic is that when their criminality is finally revealed, people know who they are; while Trump can pretend that he was only following the experts! Genius!
Trump said he waited to release the JFK files by "people he highly trusted" because of optics - in the latest silicon valley tech interview.
I just had this thought but I don't know if there's anything to it: Did Q ever spell out TRUST as an acronym? Like vertically spelling out the meaning of the first letter of each part of the word? Maybe it's a map thing?
For all those conservative talk show call in asking why Pompeo isn't being discussed as VP material...
Pompeo = Pence 2.0
Hope he's not the VP choice.
pretty sure I just got something in the mail from him....but I threw it away so don't know for sure....mostly I don't even open political mail.