It's a simple equation.
Imagine you're a NWO head.
The NWO ain't happening anymore. All your plans are on fire and in the process of being retailored just to keep you in some modicum of power...
So, it's back to the Status Quo -- Elites ruling over the Chattel.
The Woke agenda was supposed to destabilize the Nation, and that it did.
But you can't rule over ashes, though some of your comrades might wish to burn it all down on their way to hell.
You, on the other hand, want to go back to how things were; Presidents owned by special interests, Secret Societies keeping it low-key, corporate collusion kept the market in the hands of those who "deserve" it...
Just none of that End-Times Prophecy, Satanic bullshit and child trafficking.
You just want to go back to being a Wizard ruling secretly among the Muggles, with all the Voldemorts and Death-eaters left in a pile of ash.
So, what do you do when you look at the Global Birthrate Crisis you helped create, soon to be a complete collapse of humanity due to the "vaccine" depopulation agenda that only worked within a NWO reality, and is leading to the distinct likelihood all your investments into Bitcoin, Gold, Petro-Dollars, and other naked-shot market stocks are all going up in flames simultaneously and you'll be left penniless and hated by a ravenous mob of Frankenstein's monsters wanting revenge?
FUCKIN' HEEL-TURN!
Everyone was ready to let the bus roll down the cliff, but you had a change of heart once everyone started eating each-other alive. Now you gotta jump in and pump those brakes!
Issue Number 1, the Population.
You gotta reverse the damage done. You gotta get people fuckin' and raising families that don't die, aren't criminals, and will work in your slave mills.
The Agenda now is as follows:
- Ban Abortion
- Ban Contraceptives
- Ban Prostitution
- Ban Single-Sex Schools
- Discourage College and University for Women
- Villainize Same-Sex Couples for contributing to the "Birthrate Crisis"
- Ban Transgenderism and Drag
- Ban Topless Bars and Night Clubs
- Removal of all Woke and "Love is Love" Corporate Propaganda.
- Restrict Simping, such as Thots, Titty-Streamers and Only-Fans on the Internet
- Crack-down on Catfishing
- Restrict Pornography like Japan does, where everything requires censor bars and blurring.
- Teach Sex-Ed in schools at younger and younger ages, with increase focus on encouraging reproductive habits over gratification.
- Set up dating centers around the US
- Ban Tinder, Grindr, and all other "Hook-up" apps.
- Offer completely free Dating Sites (that work and aren't 10% narcissist women, 90% thirsty men), subsidized by tax monies.
- Increase tax-breaks for families with more than 2 children.
- Encourage young women (even minors) to have sex and get married younger.
- Encourage a culture of "promise rings"
- Pay men to marry ugly women.
- Bring back Boy Bands to get young girls attracted to men.
- Push IDOLs, like Britney Spears and those in Japan to get men horny for young/cute over glamour/punk so they can start popping out babies sooner.
Anything and everything that might detract from a population boom MUST GO!
Now, from a Conservative perspective, much of this would be a "YES, PLEASE!" platform. That's the selling-point.
In reality, it's only done to encourage baby-making; not because the nuclear family is valuable; not because it's morally correct; not because it's a Christian thing to do...
No... It's specifically because there is shortage in supply.
You need cattle to be a rancher. If the cattle are sparse, you need to horny them up and incentivize baby-making, not just sex.
Why is this a problem for us Patriots and Anons?
Because it's deceptive and potent. Because it builds upon a moral framework, but goes too far. The heel-turn will be from Radical Authoritarian Liberalism to Radical Authoritarian Conservativism, and it will happen at the drop of a hat with thunderous applause. Our applause.
Some things should be banned, I agree. Other things CANNOT be banned, and will only lead to people being incarcerated for so much as drawing nude anime girls online -- not because pornography is wrong morally, but because:
"The Government has declared you cannot do that. The Science says it does not support a breeding culture. You must breed for the Greater Good™. Obey."
For me, personally, the motive in pushing these bans matters, even if it is the morally correct decision. Over-Enforcement and Control has always been the issue. We shouldn't trade one set of Authoritarian Dictates for another.
We should, instead, ban Authoritarian Dictates and simply incentivize good behavior.
PS... It's happening right now. They're going to toss "Gender Studies" under the bus. My wager is before the end of September. RINOs will lead the way, so they can get in on the ground floor of the Conservative Authoritarianism.
Notice what I didn't include in that agenda.
There will not be a promotion of a nuclear family. Instead, there will be promotion of a MAN-led family. Women's rights will dwindle to only being baby-makers.
All to provide a bullet in the chamber; to recharge Feminism with ample rhetoric and hatred of over-privileged men for a future attempt at another Control Scheme Agenda.
It's the insurance plan if the Conservativism isn't embraced quickly enough.
I think you hit the nail on the head
I swear, you are me.
Isn't he wonderful? You must be too! 😆😆😆
I didn’t say we were both wonderful. All I know is that I’m an asshole most of the time. 😉. Now don’t you get me in trouble with him!!!
Welcome to the club of assholes on GAW. I'm the president and I'll make sure you get the welcome packet.
Nuclear family = a couple and their dependent children, regarded as a basic social unit
What's the method for squashing women's rights and getting girls to accept never being able to become a doctor, CEO, architect, etc.? That toothpaste is out of the tube already.
In a generation it could be
"See how messed up things used to be? This is why we as a society had to make some structural changes to get to where we are now. This is why, do it for your family, do it for your country."
Or something along those lines. It will never happen overnight.
Narrative change in the media and schools. Start publishing books, articles, and other media including videos of transgenderism, BLM riots, Antifa muggings etc. through the lens of how society went horribly wrong.
That's an awful lot of thoughts from a "sleepydude". I liked the trademarked "Greater Good".
As long as the "Elites" are running the show, it really doesn't matter which way the pendulum swings does it?
One of the elite families (House of Saud) was brought down. Where are the others?
Women being viewed as subserviant baby makers sounds a lot like radical Islam.
No... Not subserviant baby makers...
An integral part of the nuclear family and paramount in building the society of tomorrow. Women have the hardest job of all, raising the children to be the type of people we need to have a prosperous tomorrow.
This also takes a lot of work from the men to treat them as an equal, co-parent, and not just a subservient baby maker. Either the men figure out how to do this with their wives or it won't work.
Raising kids is harder than building skyscrapers or bridges, or working at an oil rig, or working on high voltage power lines, or being a (useful) firefighter?
Read my comment
The left has been using conservatism to lead to Sharia
Sharia plus socialism = America dead
"Radical islam" are those that don't want to either kill, enslave or subjugate the rest of the world.
Ain't that the truth...
And the convenient boogie man will be those crazy far right wingers. Keep the division going....
This is one of the best posts I've seen on here in a while.
I actually think part of their agenda might be to usher in "reactionary" far right politics under the guise of "saving us" from the insane leftist policies they themselves created. A lot of these creepy elites are literal Nazis. We have to be careful not to fall for everything that's not woke being "good" simply because it's not far left.
Authoritarianism comes in many guises.
Been preaching this for a while. Not only on GAW, but in real life - we're talking decades.
You have no idea how happy I am to see awakened comments like these!
It goes along with that video that shows the wave moving up and down. They go hard and get crazy and erode away some of your freedoms, and then cool the temperature down and get you good and comfortable, thinking you're winning now, and they do that just long enough to where we get complacent, and then they crank up the crazy again and start the erosion of our rights again. It's cyclical, but always in their control
Hegelian dialectic at work here...for sure!
"But then on the other hand..." George Wilhelm Fredrich Hegel
Yes, at least it's a step in the right direction. True, we shouldn't have pressure from authorities. In my 70's now and regret not being a father.
Considering the dire situation Anglos are in population wise, I say take one for the team and fire up that motor boy.
Care to elaborate on the fire situation? I have not read or watched enough on this topic!
[according to FACT directly from the global census there are only around 900 million people that identify as “white “ walking on planet earth and their numbers are dwindling every year as they struggle to meet replacement numbers with birth rates. Due to open boarder policies in the European homeland many Europeans today find themselves minoritys in their own country, Germany, Great Britain, France, ect (Germany is 40% German) planet earth currently has 7.5 to 8 billion souls alive right now the majority being Asians, Indian Latino then black even has 1.7 billion . So if you live on planet earth and identify as white you are infact a minority and quite frankly apart of a possible endanger species]
And will become minority in north america by 2043. This does not factor in the side effects of the mRNA injection which could cause mass sterilization along with rapid decrease in birth rates while dark skinned illegal immigrants pour across the border who are definitely not injected with it. Anglos are overwhelmingly lining up for the clot shot over any other race. To say I am concerned is an understatement.
I am nearly ready to support polygamy and as much reproduction as possible for any anglos who are not injected. It could get really bad.
Well, you're a man, so it's never too late! 😉
Christian fundamentalism is just another tyranny. No thanks to all of that.
Abortion shouldn't be a separate issue. It's murder plain and simple. When is it murder? 6-12 weeks seems like a reasonable mark until science and data can determine otherwise.
How about not at all. We are uhhh... not sure when babies are babies but it is okay to kill up to 12 week old babies in the womb because we aren't sure. If you and they don't know then how about not at all.
The reasonable mark is not at all. No abortions.
If you think 6-12 weeks is reasonable than you aren't any better than those who think a baby can be killed at 18 weeks or 24 weeks or during partial birth abortions.
I agree with you when you say it is murder, plain and simple.
(Forgive me if I completely am misreading your post but if you are in favor of 6-12 week abortions than disregard this apology).
So extreme hypothetical, force a 12 year old girl to carry her brother-cousin from her uncle? Force a 25 year old to bring a product of rape to term? Force a woman having severe complications to attempt to carry for the full 9 months, resulting in her and the baby's death at 7 months?
I'm not on board with a complete ban and I'm not on board with infanticide. But you need the exceptions for extenuating circumstances.
I do not favor it nor am I against it entirely. It's based on research such as when a heartbeat is detected at 6 weeks and brain waves around 12. It's also during this time that the body can still self terminate for whatever reason. So with those facts to consider that can only be weighed against interpretation of the Bible, I cannot logically or in good conscious oppose the idea outright. I also take issue with the fact women don't know when they are pregnant, at least not right away which to me comes off as a design flaw.
Ultimately the problem comes to a head when you realize that banning abortion will have the same effect as banning guns: it won't stop the criminals. So instead I believe the pro life approach is to help facilitate society shifting to be more pro life. But that starts with the movement becoming more pro life as well. As is it is, being "pro life" is just right wing wokeism. Most that claim to be such also shill for the status quo of a society that is extremely anti life and anti family. The second the maternity leave conversation comes up, suddenly it's the "I don't want to pay for that! I earned that money!" so now it's no longer pro life, you value your money more than life itself.
SO yeah. Unless you are helping to make society better, to reduce the burden of childcare to help build a pro life society you're gonna have to accept the 6-12 week compromise. Ideally I would rather there be no abortions too, however since I have actually listened to people, since I have seen firsthand how much this society hates kids, using the government isn't the way to go about it. A preferred scenario is one where people CAN choose abortion, but feel no desire to. The law does not shape morality.
Agreed - Christian fundamentalism isn't the answer. We can't just embrace uncritically what elites are telling us to reject. I tried living in an extremely conservative Catholic community (after rejecting leftism) and nothing makes feminism look better than an actual hard right community. We have to avoid all forms of authoritarianism. We have to avoid extremism.
Exactly. The Bible isn't the law of the land for a reason. Ultimately Jesus wants us to choose for ourselves.
Idk. Klause Schwab and the WEF seem pretty confident
Until a Ponzi scheme finally gets taken down, those at the top always look confident.
If they weren't confident, they wouldn't be able to convince their underlings to keep working while they sneak out the back door.
True. Bernie "Made Off" with hundreds of millions before he got nailed.
Yeah sure fair… or…you know … maybe they are confident.
sure but that doesn't necessarily mean that's the case here. im not big into jumping to conclusions. krakens and such
all good. i appreciate your posts. maybe you're right about it too. ijdk
Personally, I don’t see that they’ve given up. They seem to continue to push their agenda. They are moving toward CBDC, the prospect of a nuclear detonation looms (set off by the deep state with a patsy in place to blame) to cover the fiat currency economic collapse, the food supply continues to be squeezed, monkey pox or some substitute can still be pushed, etc. Declaring victory seems premature; no time for complacency.
Some are still pushing for it to work, and others are cutting the investment off now and trying to salvage what they can.
They aren't purely homogenous in their goals. The ones at the top simply had enough resources to take a stab at a NWO.
Just like a stock sell-off, the investment has gone sour and the ones over-invested are going with it off the cliff because they'd lose everything anyways.
Others are selling on the down-trend because they see the writing on the wall, but still have hope they can break even.
Those like JK Rowling I account as the latter group. Here entire series is about how Muggles and Magic-born should stay separate, with the Wizards and Witches ruling behind the curtain.
Never once did she suggest a world of transparency and peace between Muggles and Magic-born. She suggested it would be like old times where Witches were hunted and burned by the Muggles who simply were afraid of what they didn't understand.
The Secret Societies have all types. Some don't like the MK Ultra and Child Trafficking/Sacrifice. Some just wanna rule with old-fashioned blackmail and fraud.
I suspect, however, Trump and Patriots want full transparency. I'm optimistic with them -- that the Muggles and Magic-born can coexist peacefully. We just gotta take out the trash.
https://qalerts.app/?q=transparency
I’m fairly certain Biden wants to be like JK Rolling, I had a vivid dream about it
Quick question. Who is the "magic born" and who are the "muggles"? Just needed a little clarification my fren, that's all!
It's a Harry Potter reference.
Specifically,
The Magic-Born are all the Secret Societies, including the Freemasons, Illuminati, 13 Bloodlines, House of Saud, Dragon Societies, Fourth Reich, Khazarian Mafia, etc.
The Muggles are normies, including us -- all the "livestock" and Chattel which are traded on a regular basis. We did not grow up with all the Esoterics, and so we are "unable" to think as they do, in terms of Symbols and Higher meanings. To them, it's best a Muggle's mind get wiped if they ever see too much because our tiny little brains would refuse/resist/reject such occult Truths.
I understand the Harry Potter reference, LOVED those books as a kid. Movies are 10/10 imo. But okay now I see what you're saying. The "bloodline" families should be able to coexist with the rest of us. Which sounds simple enough, but my concern is in their lineage. Who is the ancestor for each family and why must those bloodlines be maintained at any cost? Could be something evil who knows, but on the flip side, anyone can be saved through Christ. So I see your point and I agree, but I have a few reservations is all, based on my lack of knowledge of the "magic born".
They fall victim to their own propaganda as well. I doubt they truly know who is and isn't of the 13 bloodlines.
Some think those 13 Bloodlines have all the genetic material required to birth the Anti-Christ.
That as long as they keep inter-breeding they have the best shot of producing a "Man" without a connection to God that they can completely possess like a super-computer shoving itself into a smart phone.
Others think the 13 Bloodlines are simply the most "pure" of Adam's progeny, born without Cain blood (or only Cain blood, in some sects).
Others just think the 13 Bloodlines are the result of Aliens coming here and creating Human-Alien hybrids, one pair for every specie of Aliens, and that the only way to speak with the Aliens is to stay genetically "pure."
Pick your poison -- the point is that they think their birth entitles them to certain privileges that the filthy "mudbloods" shouldn't be allowed to have.
It's Racism at its finest, really.
Oh, speaking of Racism.
There's racism, and then there's Racism, with a capital R.
racism is talking about skin tone.
Racism is talking about Soul Tone. The Color of your Soul.
Black and White.
https://greatawakening.win/p/15IEqZV97g/with-q-capitalizing-his-name-tod/
https://greatawakening.win/p/141raAucQi/
Yeah I've heard the theories of their lineage, which is where my concern lies. Lineage is important in the bible (I'm a Christian), so it's only natural for me to have a hesitance towards [them]. But you're right, it's really the contents of their souls that matter at the end of the day despite my feelings towards them.
"It reminds me of Harry Potter. The people in that world who can’t use magic are called muggles, but the muggles do not know this. The muggles cannot see the wizards as wizards despite living in the same world side by side. The series romanticizes the secret club of comms aware people, and this is probably why it’s so successful."
The temptation for anons to obsess over bloodlines and lineages is overwhelming. The boring answer? Comms Awareness is taught within families, passed down from parent to child. Large families in Clown World is actually discouraged. "Sacrificing" one's child to turn another into a "star", is.
Reconcile the first paragraph, which describes the entire original book series, with the latest "Fantastic Beasts" film. From my understanding in the film, the Muggle and the Wizard world collide. Smells a lot like Disclosure.
Definitely smells like disclosure fren 🤔
Like Dave of X22 says...of course they're pushing back, but that doesn't mean they're winning.
Except THIS, for fuck's fucking sake:
Absolutely not. Blue- and purple-haired tacklebox-faces with neck and boob tattoos would love teaching it, but no.
There is zero legitimate excuse for any adult to be discussing anything at all of any sexual nature whatsoever with any child under high-school age. None. Zero. Zip. Zilch. Nada. Even if you try to focus on the naked biology of reproduction, you're still an adult talking sex to other people's children.
And then, in high school, we're kinda busy with stuff like English lit, English comp, algebra, trigonometry, foreign languages, economics, actual civics and history (not revised bullshit), etc. Oops, no time for adults enthusiastically talking about sex to revved-up hormonal teens, either, except for about a week in sophomore or junior biology class where you kind of have to go over it.
We need to go back to the normal conservative reality where sex is simply not a school subject. Children and toddlers do not need to hear about it, see it, know about it. Let them be kids, I say.
They'll figure it out. We all did.
Off topic a bit, but curricula should include a couple of courses on 'life management', including basic banking skills (saving, budgeting, balancing checkbook, how to apply for a loan), how to apply for a job, how to ask for a raise/promotion, how to read a basic contract (for cell phones, buying a car at the 'buy here pay here' place), how to fill out a basic form/application for 'whatever', how to ask the right questions at a service provider (at the Dr, mechanic, using tradespeople, etc.) Basic laws re marriage, even?(spez: Add 'taxes' state, local federal, and Civics - how the government works).
Kids don't always get that at home, especially if the parent(s) aren't in positions to have used these skills, successfully, themselves. This is partially why government dependence is multi-generational. "Running low on cash? Have another baby. Get it declared disabled."
And, lastly, while I'm on my soapbox... I know that all families cannot afford to have their kids participate in sports, but in my observation, team sports are a big help in learning how to function as a team player in the workplace. Not necessary for some but helpful in development and learning to 'share'.
Again, the goal is to promote reproduction.
I tried to calculate which would be more likely -- push for younger sexualization of kids (but not pedophilia, normalizing minors getting pregnant with minors their age) OR arranged marriages.
I decided arranged marriages have a much less likely chance of happening, so the only way to encourage kids start pumping out babies as soon as they hit puberty, like in the old days, is to have 'em learn early on.
I'm against both situations, mind you, but this platform is for Hyper-Reproduction, not morality, and that's my point. We shouldn't support Neo-Cons when they start pushing this crap.
They'll say stuff like "We are gonna end gender-fluidity in our schools! We just have to teach kids sex is for reproduction."
Like you said, "Sex is not a school subject."
Get it the fuck out of our classrooms, no matter if it's a Priest, a Social Worker, or a Drag Queen. It's a job for the PARENTS, whether they like it or not.
You also have to consider that with the way teens are these days, if they had a bunch of kids, they wouldn’t be able to provide for or care for them whatsoever. I would venture to say that most people aren’t financially or mentally responsible enough to actually care for kids until mid 20’s- and that’s really pushing it. There would have to be an entire paradigm shift in so many ways for this to work
I'm not being negative but I refuse to believe any of this until it actually happens. The far left has become so detached from humanity that this will never be accepted without a bloodbath.
Even if the globohomos tell their goons to stand down for this they will not listen at this point. No way can I believe this. They have created a brainwashed herd of people who have completely abandoned what little brain cells they had left. You can't get the far left to ever go back to any small percentage of normal, they will completely tard out.
Keep in mind, the Liberal Soy-boy and FemiNazi are useless regardless of what happens.
It was always the plan to kill them off. They are anarchistic and don't follow authority, only the lure of revolution. They'd be horrible slaves to maintain.
That's why they've been selectively breeding Chinese people like dogs for the last 70 years. They have cultivated what they deem to be the most submissive and reliant slaves imaginable. The "one child" policy guaranteed they could pick and choose anyone who showed a modicum of independence and snip their balls off or send them to re-education centers early on. Those who didn't bend, were snapped.
They have no use for the US. All White and Black people will be extinguished, and Hispanics will flood the Nation, as they have proven to be controllable by Banana Republic type governments well enough.
Let’s regain control of our government first. And I don’t mean GOP winning the house and senate and presidency again.
The rest we can deal with after.
Glad this got stickied, you hit the nail right dead nuts center on the head. We gotta be careful of the heel turn.... These people will do anything to stay in power
There is no scenario, game theory or otherwise, that performing these actions, increasing the population of "the cattle", doesn't end up in the destruction of Clown World. As Q says, "there are more good people than bad".
Turns out, we people are hard to kill. We're talking at the level of millions of people. World Wars? Orchestrated by bankers, with significant Comms setting up and executing them over decades. Nuclear bombs? They don't exist, they are symbolic Comms for "nation ending" blackmail evidence. Reconcile that with all the articles of nukes "the size of a suitcase" and how Russia has "lost a number of nukes" over the years. It is illogical to maintain the belief that one can simply wipe out the Eastern Seaboard.
Clowns understand that this is Them vs. Us, except "Us" have been sleeping beneath layers upon layers of illusions. Q would never have been possible if we were back in the 50s all religiously watching just 3 news networks. We are too many, our thoughts, our talents, our forums too diverse. The nuclear family is the greatest bastion of individual thought. The LAST thing Clowns want to encourage.
What caused Japan to surrender then?
Threat of Russia invading
Yes. This has the absolute potential to go too far in the other direction. Ever read The Handmaid's Tale?
I have not, but I'm certain the morals of it have been lost on those who dress up in red with the white collars outside of pro-life centers.
Nobody is asking for that reality. We just want people to not try and solve all the "problems" they made for themselves with homicide.
Agreed. These LARPERS you mention have twisted the narrative of the book to suit their own ends. Their objective is to end life, and not accept being told they can't (which isn't even what an overturn of R v. W would mean) whereas the book's overarching theme is the forced creation & nurturing of life in a milieu of theocratic bondage.
The scary part is that the book describes a future world in which fertility rates have dropped to such a degree that a theocratic faction in the US stages a coup of the government and redefines everything, including morality, with a push to procreate at the cost of almost everything else, under the guise of piety. Many of the themes you mention in your OP. You're absolutely right, no one (at least, no one with any semblance of morality) would want that as a reality, but these NWO-heads have proven that morality is not something that they're burdened by in the slightest, and if they're left pulling the strings, I wouldn't be surprised to see them push such an agenda.
'Pay men to marry ugly women.'
Retropay? Asking for a friend who's looking for some ROI.
Marriage provides no return on investment.
Can I write her off as a depreciating asset? Let's say over a 10 year period?
I'm even willing to pay taxes on the delta between her and the new year model should I ever trade her in.
Deal! I'll take partial credit. "Ugly dependent wife credit" shall be placed towards a treadmill and if she hits her goals I'll take her to the Choctaw Casino across the Red River and get her tits a fluff job while we're there.
Can someone explain to me why we need more people? I don’t believe we should purposefully kill people off like the deep state wants but I seriously don’t get why people on here want more people. I live in a high populated area and would love if there were 20% less people here.
If you suddenly have 20% of the population retiring because they're too old to work with no one to replace them, you've got yourself a recipe for an economic collapse.
Even if you kill off those 20%, the entire infrastructure of some cities was tailored to support a large population. Calculations in traffic, food availability, labor, and investment were made for GROWTH not DECLINE.
The city will collapse, and anyone stuck there along with it. Labor will be in such high demand, those who can work will be overworked and under-paid. Businesses would rather leave and start smaller businesses where they know they can find workers.
What's worse, is that if you're too busy working just to keep the city's lights on, you have no time for baby-making, which leads to even more population decline.
It gets to a point where there aren't enough children, and the parents are too busy, and the old people too much of a burden, that the whole thing devolves into a chaos. You can't just build a system that relies on a ton of people without a ton of people to run it.
Remember Goldilocks? One chair is too big, one too small, the last is just right? It's every bit of an issue having a city with too few people as it is to have an over-crowded city. The city is designed to run with a minimum amount of people working as well as maximum.
I think what it really comes down to is that Civilization is like a car. Once you get up to a certain speed you can't just stop on a dime without having your head bash into the dashboard. You gotta ease off slowly. Even a 2-child policy doesn't account for population loss due to tragedies.
Look at Detroit. Believe it once housed over 2M people, last two decades it’s fallen under a million. The city is fighting and coming back in many ways, but there are plenty of areas that are straight up in ruins.
Now multiply this by everywhere.
"I'm old enough to remember..." there was once a US president who worked feverishly to bring companies back to American soil for production, decreased unemployment rates for ALL classifications, and actually had a plan to improve America. Hmmm..... (Could really 'cut a rug', too.)
The entire history of humanity leaves ruins.
I'd like to recommend to you a podcast I heard last week: "Mysterious Universe - Decivilization" Episode 27.23. In it, the cohosts discuss the book, "The End of the World is Just the Beginning." The book makes the case that birthrates are already too low everywhere and that it's too late to change. Globalization and global trade are nearly over. We've built up our societies to a point that we can't go back, yet we can't sustain it.
Rock solid analysis. I think you might very well be onto something OP!
Sleepy dude, there was no sleep involved in that analysis. Bravo. Very good points and observations. Ill be paying attention from now on—to this. Thank you
Go down historical laws passed and determine which ones were positive or negative on our society. Ie - I would ban the following - women’s suffrage , Congress’s right to insider stock trading, the Patriot Act, the Federal Reserve, women in our military, women in leadership roles in church.
Then determine what new laws would be needed to thwart this from happening again. I.e., I would limit Congressional terms and ban foreign ownership of US property.
Also, our entire 3-letter agencies need completely dismantled and rebuilt with checks in place.
PS - I understand you are focusing on attacking feminism. But there is more than that that needs addressed.
I'm with you except repealing women's suffrage.
Regardless of your moral or reasoned stance, ultimately it would provide a bandwagon for women to jump on to that can easily be exploited by insurgencies.
The same goes for Civil Rights. If you take it away, even if they want it gone, the disparity will only fuel the flames of insurgent-backed revolutionaries and intersectionalists.
Like the atomic bomb, once the cat is out of the bag, there's no going back in, regardless of whether or not you like atom bombs or pissed off cats.
100% this. I used to be anti-feminist until I lived in an actual hard right community. The anti-feminists have just as many problems as the feminists - it's just that the feminists have more power now so it's easier to idealize their opposite. People try to sneak in control any way they can. The key is always to be on the lookout for authoritarianism.
Also, we are not a patriarch species. Men and women are socially equals. Gender roles are not meant to place one over the other. That has NEVER been the case. I even question the Adam and Eve story especially since Adam and Lilith came LONG before. And then lets consider that despite some issues, overall it is better for people to figure out their lives and what works best for them. Men have strengths and weaknesses. So do women. We're supposed to complement each other. We're supposed to be a team.
Agreed.
One analogy I often hear in Catholic circles is that the Man is the Head and the Woman is the Neck.
The Head does the decision making, but without the Neck it can only look forward. Likewise, a Neck without a Head can't make up its mind.
And so, a Woman is known to give Man a wider Vision, as his Muse.
And a Man assertively moves the Woman to where she wants to go, even though she might not realize what she wanted.
Problems arise when the Man ceases to think and the Woman ceases to swivel...
Great analogy! Will share with my wife!
The problem is that women tend to vote for things that eventually destroy nations.
While I agree, I think that's simply because they want to feel important, like anyone, and will eagerly join a movement to make them feel like they're doing something, even when they might live in a veritable utopia.
Men have an inherent need to protect and fix things. Women have an inherent need to push limits and feel needed. When deprived of opportunities to fulfill these innate desires, men will run away to find something worthy of protection and construction while women will band together and eventually find problems where there were none, just to feel like they're needed.
You mean like the Deep State? Like the lib Dems? Like the soyboys who turn up at all of these events? You might want to support your answer.
Agreed. Demonizing women or turning them into baby machines with no opportunities is not the way.
I also wouldn't say Lilith is much of a role model with her whole baby killing thing but I get what you mean.
There's aspects of that mythology that I question, but suffice it to say that if the Bible can be corrupted and twisted, as it has, then so to can the origin story of man, whichever it may be.
I believe the Lilith killing babies came after the "rewrite" of Adam and Lilith to Adam and Eve. We can't assume these mythologies are correct and original, but we can't assume they are completely made up either. We assume that because of modern society and being conditioned to accept that myths aren't real that they aren't... Well those ideas came from somewhere. And the ideas that are completely made up bullshit rarely survive the test of time. Eventually they get called out and scrutinized.
Most of our society is built on intricate lies laced with truth. I have found that when there is a conflict regarding history, most often times the truth is in the middle of both ideas... And I mean, seeing the lengths at which our media has lied, what else have we been lied to about?
Thankfully not Jesus. I try to live His Way when I can and time and again the concept of service leadership proves itself true.
Normally I'd be totally with you but a family member got into Lilith worship because he believed she was a maligned Goddess and he ended up possessed for like 6 months. He's ok now but he went through some pretty freaky stuff.
“For me, personally, the motive in pushing these bans matters, even if it is the morally correct decision. Over-Enforcement and Control has always been the issue. We shouldn't trade one set of Authoritarian Dictates for another.”> amen
weird post brother
I agree there. They still want control and will want more subjects to rule over. However they will not resurrect the nuclear family as long as they keep the family court the way it is. I guarantee the "bachelor tax" will come from the RINOs.
The family court will be every bit as predatory, but it will provide women with ample opportunity to immediately marry again and make more babies.
I suspect the man will be forced to pay more in child support up-front, but they will reduce the duration so he only has to pay 4 years, tops. No more waiting 'til the kid is 18.
This will both make it necessary for the baby-momma to find a new man every 4 years as well as make it impossible for a man to survive divorce, to the point of doing absolutely everything to stay together no matter the mental suffering, simply because the 4-years he does pay will see him dead in a gutter.
That does make sense. Especially since we need like 5 kids per household to get to replacement levels. Cause at the moment we're almost like japan with an aging population and young population (specifically men) refusing to even consider having a family.
I could see Chrislam playing a role in this- If you take grace out of Christianity, what you get is legalism with a 'Christian veneer'. Very dangerous.
We need Constitutionalists everywhere, we'd be resistant to whatever form of tyranny tries to degenerate us.
When they have to make more laws, we lose. They always swing the pendulum too far, giving us problems with extremists. You can't legislate people into having ethics and morals, those need to be taught and learned.
Cankles is already saying that the trannie thing is a bad idea. And Amazon said they wouldn't have enough workers to keep going in the future. You might be onto something.
LMFAO 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
I imagine so many years in the future, an archeologist uncovers what seems to be hieroglyphs of 2B and Tifa on a jailhouse wall.
Archeologist: 🧐 "This must've been who they worshipped back then."
Floating head Pepe: 🐸 "Well, something like that..."
Started to get a little unhinged there toward the end of your list:
Encourage young women (even minors) to have sex and get married younger. Pay men to marry ugly women. Bring back Boy Bands to get young girls attracted to men. Push IDOLs, like Britney Spears and those in Japan to get men horny for young/cute over glamour/punk so they can start popping out babies sooner.
I don't think it wise to promote minors having babies, paying men to marry ugly women, or creating idolatry is the answer to ANY problem we might have.
It would be enough to remove easy divorce and put in a tax break for married men that increases with every child born of their first and only wife. They you would have stable families with more children, job done.
I'm not saying this is a GOOD agenda. I'm saying, it's the one [they] are about to switch to.
Can you imagine MSM abandoning Wokism and then pushing all the above?
No?
Then get ready to be surprised, because that's what we're moving towards. The Cabal is about to adopt this agenda because they know they've lost the numbers needed to keep Wokism in power. Either they shift gears and try to be "Saviors" who brought us back from the brink of Sodom and Ghamorrah or they get burnt alive when we figure out what they've been doing to our kids.
Either you go with the flow or drown, so they are gonna Heel-turn right into Radical Authoritarian Conservativism and hope our eagerness to get rid of the Woke filth will propel them into a Totalitarian Theocracy they are in charge of.
It won't work, because Anons are too suspicious of everything, but the normies will support it just to have a moment of sanity after 3+ years of total insanity.
This is what they did in Weimar Germany when they installed Hitler to finalize the Zionist exodus and hand the Rothschilds their own Country we now call Israel.
Oh I see what you're driving at, yes indeed I had wondered similar some time back: were they creating the woke simply to create an antithesis to the old thesis, to destruct them both in a conflict to bring about their synthesis. Makes sense they would come out of it with sexual access to minors inserted in the confusion and backlash. It is their modus, you're correct.
Yeah.
The only difference between the Spanish Inquisition and Wokism is ideology. The mechanics are all the same, but with a different coat of paint. Functionally, they are the same -- canceling and black-listing people for going against the Authority, be it Mob-run Majority or a Papal-State.
Their Plan B if Wokism were ever rejected would be to 180° right into a Hyper-Conservative 'Spanish' Inquisition agenda.
Patriots like Trump have to carefully navigate that fine line so that they don't inadvertently feed a future Totalitarian State. That's why Trump has been passive on homosexuality and has said very little about transgenderism compared to others in MAGA. It's clear what his stance would be, but he has to maintain a moral neutrality and just do things that make sense economically, scientifically, statistically and reasonably.
Though it pains me to admit it, there's always the chance he and Q both are Controlled Opposition designed to give guarantees that the Neo-Conservative Totalitarian State would triumph and hand everything right into the hands of the Cabal... If that were the case, however, they would be playing more into it like Hitler did. Trump, honestly, is too moderate for that to be the plan.
One of the best threads I've read here, and VERY relevant.
GJ op
NEVER, EVER TRUST OR ELECT A RINO AGAIN!
Excellent, thanks.
Frickin preach, dude. I 100% agree.
If we rope the RINOs in by exploiting their self-preservation it is all to the good because that alone won't be enough to save them. NCSWIC.
Not all want families.
You see... That's the problem I'm pointing out.
If the pendulum swings all the way in the other direction, it still wouldn't matter "what you want."
Papa Gubment says drop your trousers and make a baby. Or else...
I don't care what society wants, I don't want kids and I'd rather have my balls cut off than pollute the gene pool.
That sounds awful. And I can see it happening. The pendulum will always swing back.
How do we stop this? Or do we? I just got a cold, sinking feeling that what you wrote is The Plan.
The battle was over before it started. Patriots have already won because their Sacrifices have already been paid for in full.
What was the big indicator that things aren't going their way, and that the Hand of God is coming to settle down the Pendulum so it doesn't crack the Grandfather Clock's housing?
I'd say it happened in 2012 when USFS officer Sean Smith and CIA contractors Tyrone S. Woods and Glen Doherty disobeyed the Chain of Command and decided to save US Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens after Hillary Clinton put a hit out on him for trying to disclose she had sold Advanced Stinger Missiles to Terrorists.
If they had not disobeyed direct orders and gone to retrieve the Server Stevens had died preserving, we'd not be here right now.
Who has the Server now?
Patriots do.
We'd ALL still be in Kansas, thinking Tornadoes weren't caused by Witches.
Those four were the beginning of the end of the 16-year plan.
It is the story which woke this sleepydude up from his slumber and got me actively wondering if we were the bad guys all along...
They slipped up in 2012, and they've been lying to cover lies after lies ever since. All the lying has caught up with them, and the stakes were taken to the brink; the precipice.
https://qalerts.app/?q=benghazi
Ah, fantastic answer. Thank you. Clearly you’re very informed on the timeline of deep happening that has led us to…here. I’m very curious how you see things playing out and what the final outcome looks like.
I had written a reply last night but looks like it glitched out. Anyway, thank you for this!
If you wouldn’t mind, how do you see all this going? Will there be a years long push toward the scenario in your OP? What does THE decisive win look like?
Thank you sir.
I think the above will fall flat on it's ass as soon as they try to launch it.
They underestimate Conservative people's awareness on how dead Legacy Media truly is.
Once everyone starts saying things we want to hear, I suspect most people will have a "hol' up" moment and start throwing all the memes of these Woke news anchors who suddenly had a change of heart right back in their faces.
Memes are the grand equalizer that the Cabal never accounted for. They're too potent and offer people a pictographic diary of events that can't be swept away like how they do with news articles.
Memes have RUINED their NWO plan and any contingencies they had prepared. It provides us a memory that far surpasses theirs.
In other words, most of their grand narrative pushes over the last few centuries have relied upon the new generations forgetting the past. Memes make that impossible.
https://qalerts.app/?q=meme
https://qalerts.app/?n=2390
https://qalerts.app/?n=2387